Professional Documents
Culture Documents
107 UDCS ISO6892changes
107 UDCS ISO6892changes
net/publication/318030558
CITATIONS READS
5 11,107
1 author:
Bulent Aydemir
The Scientific & Technological Research Council of Turkey
138 PUBLICATIONS 454 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Bulent Aydemir on 30 June 2017.
163
3rd Iron and Steel Symposium(UDCS’17)3-5April 2017 Karabuk-TURKEY
involves the control of the estimated strain rate over the parallel In the 2016 version of the standard, the recommended speed
length, (e*Lc), which is achieved by using the crosshead values in Figure 1 are detailed. Speed steps 1,2,3,4,5 for method
separation speed (vc) calculated by multiplying the required A1; 5.6 speed steps for method A2; For the method B, 7 speed
strain rate by the parallel length. For a better understanding of stages can be used.
this, we can give an example as follows. For a sample with a
parallel length of 80 mm, the required crosshead speed (for the C. Other changes
2nd and 4th range velocities given in figure 1) should be: The 8th heading of the standard was changed to the
"Marking the original gauge length" in the 2009 version, while
vc Lc . eLc the "Original gauge length and extensometer gauge length" was
changed in the 2016 version. In addition to, the headings of
choice of the original gauge length, marking the original gauge
length and choice of the extensometer gauge length have been
added.
Appendix G, as a new part of the standard, is added specifies
Stress rate control is defined in Method B as standard. This the determination of the modulus of elasticity. In the 2016
definition doesn’t change from the previous version. The version, the names of the other suffixes have changed due to
tensile stress rate (Ŕ) varies according to the modulus of the addition of Annex G chapter, but the sections remained the
elasticity of the material being applied. These values are given same.
in Table 1 below. Important information is given in Annex G. For example, it
is stated that the material testing machine has class 1 or better
class according to ISO 7500-1 standard. The extensometer
system is required to have class 0.5 or better class according to
ISO 9513 standard. It is defined that the sample sizes are
measured with a calibrated device with better accuracy than ±
0.5 %. It has also been disclosed that it is important that the
material testing machine is made according to ASTM E1012 or
ISO 23788 in the measurement of the alignment.
In addition, when determining the minimum data sampling
frequency (f), the following formula is proposed:
N .E. e
f
R2 R1
Where N is the number of measured values, E is the elastic
modulus, ė is the test speed, and R1, and R2 are the tensile values
that the data sampling frequency is determined. For example, if
R1 = 10 MPa, R2 = 50 MPa for steel, and the test speed is
0.00007 s-1, the data sampling frequency shall be greater than
18 Hz.
Furthermore, methods of calculating elastic modulus and
calculation of elastic modulus uncertainty are described in
detail.
Apart from these, the bibliography has increased 41 to 58 by
the additional resources given in the Annex G section [1, 3].
164
3rd Iron and Steel Symposium(UDCS’17)3-5April 2017 Karabuk-TURKEY
165
3rd Iron and Steel Symposium(UDCS’17)3-5April 2017 Karabuk-TURKEY
A summary table of the test speed methods defined in ISO
6892-1 is given in Table 2 [5]. Inhere the control types and the
feedback sources for the control are given for different
methods. Time-to-install time was measured as the test time,
and the reproducibility values of the test results were given as
comparability. Different test speeds are the most important
affect test time. The aim is that Method A1 provides this for
accurate and reproducible results in the shortest test run.
In the figure given in Figure 7, the test time is given for the REFERENCES
aluminium sample according to different test speeds. As can be
[1] ISO 6892-1, (2016), Metallic materials -- Tensile testing -- Part 1:
seen, the test carried out in method A1 according to ISO 6892- Method of test at room temperature
1 in the closed loop strain control provides a time saving of [2] ISO 6892-1, (2009), Metallic materials -- Tensile testing -- Part 1:
35 % compared to the method A2 and method B control [3, 5- Method of test at room temperature
[3] B. Aydemir, ISO 6892-1:2016 Metalik Malzemelerin Çekme Deneyi
7].
Standardındaki Değişiklikler ve Etkileri, 2017, Metal Dünyası,
Sayı:283, S.68-72
[4] B. Aydemir, Metalik Malzemelerin Çekme Deney Standardı EN ISO
6892-1’in Getirdiği Değişiklikler, 2013, Makine Teknolojileri
Elektronik Dergisi Cilt: 10, No: 3, 2013 (61-70)
[5] http://www.instron.com.tr/tr-tr/testing-solutions/by-
material/metals/tension/iso-6892-12016
[6] Understanding the New ISO 6892-1:2016 and the Most Notable
Changes: An Interview with Matthew Spiret,
http://www.azom.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=13017
[7] Updates to metals standards 2015, www.instron.com
Fig. 7. Comparison of test times for aluminium samples at [8] B. Aydemir, H. Taşcan, C. Camyurdu, Çekme deneyinde farklı uzama
ölçme yöntemlerinin etkilerinin incelenmesi, 2015, Metal Dünyası, Sayı
different speeds 266, S.44-50, İstanbul
[9] B. Aydemir, Malzeme Deneylerinde (Çekme deneyi) Ölçüm
Belirsizliğinin Hesaplanması Eğitim Dokümanı - G2KV-110, 2015,
IV. CONCLUSIONS G2KV-110, Nisan 2015, TÜBİTAK UME
In this study, significant changes were summarized between
the ISO 6892-1 (2016) standard and the previous ISO 6892-1
(2009) standard. In this respect, it is aimed to help the
understanding of this standard which is used in many testing
laboratory in this sector. In addition, the results of the most
important of these changes on the tensile test speed selection
are summarized.
For the purpose of using methods A1 and A2 in ISO 6892-1,
the explanation is as follows: "It is intended to reduce the
measurement uncertainty associated with the change in the test
speed and the test results at which the speed-sensitive
parameters A1 and A2 are to be determined." In addition, - it is
desirable to document the shape of the curve in the test speed
and to document the speed of the test. In addition, the similarity
of test speeds in the reproducibility and reproducibility of the
yield strength results is also important.
166