Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Cat Rubric
Cat Rubric
Data processing, You did not process and Your processed and You adequately processed You demonstrated You excelled in data
researching, and organize the data, leading synthesised data shows and organised the data, effective data processing processing, research, and
synthesis of information to an incoherent and some effort but lack but the synthesis could be and synthesis, resulting in synthesis, and provided a
poorly synthesised report. coherence and depth. more comprehensive and a well-structured report highly organized and
insightful. with valuable insights. insightful report.
Responses to the three Your responses are Your responses are You provided accurate You excelled in
questions posed and partially accurate but reasonably accurate and and well-thought-out responding to the
hypothesis lacked depth and critical demonstrate some critical responses to the questions questions and hypothesis,
thinking. thinking, but and hypothesis. showcasing exceptional
improvements are needed. critical thinking and
insight.
Writing clarity and The report is poorly The report is generally The report is well-written, The report is
communication of written, with numerous clear, but occasional clear, and effectively exceptionally well-
findings grammatical errors, and is grammar and communicates the written, with impeccable
challenging to understand. communication issues are findings and insights. clarity and
present. communication of
complex ideas.
Overall presentation, The report lacks visual The report includes some The report includes basic The report is well- The report is
creativity, and inclusion elements, creativity, and visual elements. visual elements, presented, incorporating exceptionally presented,
of visuals does not include maps or enhancing the creative visuals and creatively using visuals,
figures to support the presentation. relevant maps/figures to maps, and figures to
findings. enhance understanding. captivate the audience.
Collaboration within the You did not effectively You showed minimal You cooperated with You collaborated well You excelled in
team collaborate with peers, effort in collaborating peers to some extent, but with peers, leading to a collaborating with peers,
resulting in a disjointed with peers, impacting the improvements in cohesive report that fostering a seamless
report with conflicting overall cohesiveness of communication and demonstrates teamwork. integration of ideas,
information. the report. teamwork are needed. perspectives, and
contributions.