Nguyén Trung Tanh
(Bién soan)
Trich gidng van hoc My
READINGS
IN
AMERICAN LITERATURE
A COLLEGE - LEVEL LITERATURE COURSE
BOOK II
Compiled by NGUYEN TRUNG TANH
NHA XUAT BAN THANH PHO HO CHi MINHCONTENTS
PART | : FICTION
1. Stories with Commentaries
Ernest Hemingway
The Killers
William Faulkner
A Rose for Emily
James Thurber
The Secret Life of Walter ey
2. Stories for Analysis
Ernest Hemingway
A Clean, Well-lighted Place
Willa Cather
The Sculptor’s Funeral
3. Stories for Study
Sherwood Anderson
The Strength of God
The Teacher
Sophistication
Ernest Hemingway
Old Man at the Bridge
F. Scott Fitzgerald
The Sensible Thing
Thomas Wolf
Man's Youth
Hunger to Devour the Earth
Saul Bellow
The Adventures Of Augie March (Excerpts)
2 - READINGS IN AMERICAN LITERATURE Book Ii
101
102
103
112
121
135
135
139
140
159
166
175
7.O.Henry
The Cop and the Anthem
Kate Chopin
A Respectable Woman
PART Il : NONFICTION
Ernest Hemingway
Speech On Receiving The Nobel Prize
True Nobility
Martin Luther King
"l Have @ Dream" Speech
The Nobel Peace Prize Speech
Dwight David Eisenhower
An Open Letter to America’s Students
Sherwood Anderson
Discovery of A Father
PART Ill : POETRY
Walt Whitman
When I Heard the Learn’d Astronomer
A Noiseless Patient Spider
On The Beach At Night Alone
There Was @ Child Went Forth
Chant 6 from "Song of Myself"
Chant 48 from "Song of Myself"
Chant 52 from "Song of Myself"
185
186
194
195
204
205
207
208
210
214
214
221
READINGS IN AMERICAN LITERATURE Book Il - 3PART I
FICTION
4 - READINGS IN AMERICAN LITERATURE Book |iSTORIES
WITH
COMMENTARIES
READINGS IN AMERICAN LITERATURE Book II - 5If a writer of prose knows enough about what he’s writing about, he
may omit things that he knows and the readers, if their writer is writing
truly enough, will have a feeling of these things as strongly as though
the writer has stated them. The dignity of movement of an ice - berg
is due to only one-eighth of it being above the water.
-Ernest Hemingway
6 - READINGS IN AMERICAN LITERATURE Book IiERNEST HEMINGWAY
1899 - 1961
Ernest Miller Hemingway was born at Oak Park, Illinois, a suburb of
Chicago. He attended the public schools there but had no further formal
education. As a young man he commenced the life of high and romantic
adventure that he pursued throughout his life. He volunteered for
ambulance duty in World War I and served on the Italian front, from
which experiences he wrote his best novel, A Farewell to Arms (1929).
He became an enthusiastic participant in various sporting pursuits,
including big-game hunting and deep-sea fishing; he was an aficionado
of bullfighting, as reflected in several of his books; and he participated
in the Spanish Civil War, about which he wrote his book For Whom
the Bell Tolls (1940). From his ambulance duty in World War I
Hemingway went to Paris, where he was influenced to some extent
by Gertrude Stein, though the degree may not have been as great as
her own writings have indicated. From his life among the young
émigrés in Paris he wrote his first successful novel, The Sun Also Rises
(1926), which established him as the principal spokesman of the "lost
generation," that group of young men and women disillusioned and
left without direction by the breakdown of established society that
attended World War I and followed in its wake. Long before he was
awarded the Nobel Prize in 1954, Hemingway was generally ranked
among the top novelists of his century. John O’Hara called him the
greatest writer of English since Shakespeare, though O'Hara, his
disciple, may be the only novelist better than Hemingway in the
recording of casual dialogue. Hemingways influence on other writers
was and remains matchless. He was the principal apostle and to a
certain extent the creator of the style called "modern American," an
approach to writing in which the writing itself is terse, simple, and
unadorned, and all emotion or sentiment must be developed through
the narrative and not through extravagance in the mode of its
expression. Especially in The Sun Also Rises, A Farewell to Arms,and
some of his short stories (which by some critics are more admired than
his novels), Hemingway often achieves a heart-rending effect in a
READINGS IN AMERICAN LITERATURE Book {| - 7series of brief sentences constructed of simple words in the most natural
syntax. The Sun Also Rises is @ story of temporary expatriates from the
United States and England living on cheap francs in the Paris of the
early 1920s, and of their excursion to Spain; the title is from the first
chapter of Ecclesiastes. A Farewell to Arms is a love story set in wartime
Italy and contains a justly celebrated account of the Italian defeat at
Caporetto; For Whom the Bell Tolls has as its principal message the
idea that war cannot be isolated but affects everyone, even those who
wish to be neutral or nonbelligerent. Its title is from a sermon by John
Donne, in a passage beginning "No man is an island ..."
8 - READINGS IN AMERICAN LITERATURE Book IiERNEST HEMINGWAY
The Killers
THE door of Henry's lunehroom opened and
two men came in. They sat down at the counter.
“What's yours ?" George asked them.
"| don’t know," one of the men said. "What do you want to eat, Al?"
"L don’t know," said Al. "I don’t know what I want to eat."
Outside it was getting dark. The street light came on outside the
window. The two men at the counter read the menu. From the other
end of the counter Nick Adams watched them. He had been talking
to George when they came in.
"Pll have a roast pork tenderloin with apple sauce and mashed
potatoes," the first man said.
"It isn’t ready yet."
"What the hell do you put it on the card for 2"
"That's the dinner," George explained. "You can get that at six
o'clock."
George looked at the clock on the wall behind the counter.
"It’s five o’clock."
"The clock says twenty minutes past five," the second man said.
“It's twenty minutes fast."
"Oh, to hell with the clock," the first man said. "What have you got
to eat ?"
"| can give you any kind of sandwiches," George said. "You can have
ham and eggs, bacon and eggs, liver and bacon, or a steak."
"Give me chicken croquettes with green peas and cream sauce
and mashed potatoes."
"That's the dinner."
"Everything we want's the dinner, eh ? That's the way you work it."
"I can give you ham and eggs, bacon and eggs, liver-"
READINGS IN AMERICAN LITERATURE Book II - 9"Til take ham and eggs," the man called Al said. He wore a derby
hat and a black overcoat buttoned across the chest. His face was small
and white and he had tight lips. He wore a silk muffler and gloves.
"Give me bacon and eggs," said the other man. He was about the
same size as Al. Their faces were different, but they were dressed like
twins. Both wore overcoats too tight for them. They sat leaning forward,
their-elbows on the counter.
"Got anything to drink 2" Al asked.
"Silver beer, bevo, ginger ale," George said.
"I mean you got anything to drink ?"
"Just those I said."
"This is a hot town," said the other. "What do they call it ?"
"Summit."
"Ever hear of it 2" Al asked his friend.
"No," said the friend.
"What do you do here nights ?" Al asked.
"They eat the dinner," his friend said. "They all come here and eat
the big dinner."
"That's right," George said.
"So you think that’s right ?" Al asked George.
"Sure."
"You're a pretty bright boy, aren’t you 2"
"Sure," said George.
"Well, you're not," said the other little man. "Is he, Al 2"
"He’s dumb," said Al. He turned to Nick. "What’s your name ?"
"Adams."
"Another bright boy," Al said. "Ain’t he a bright boy, Max ?"
"The town’s full of bright boys," Max sdid.
George put the two platters, one of ham and eggs, the other of
bacon and eggs, on the counter. He set down two side dishes of fried
potatoes and closed the wicket into the kitchen.
"Which is yours ?" he asked Al.
"Don’t you remember ?"
"Ham and eggs."
10 - READINGS IN AMERICAN LITERATURE Book |!"Just a bright boy," Max said. He leaned forward and took the ham.
and eggs. Both men ate with their gloves on. George watched them
eat.
"What are you looking at ?" Max looked at George.
"Nothing."
"The hell you were. You were looking at me."
"Maybe the boy meant it for a joke, Max," Al said.
George laughed.
"You don’t have to laugh," Max said to him. "You don’t have to laugh
at all, see ?"
"All right," said George.
"So he thinks it’s all right." Max turned to Al. "He thinks it’s all right.
That’s a good one."
"Oh, he’s a thinker," Al said. They went on eating.
"What's the bright boy’s name down the counter ?" Al asked Max.
"Hey, bright boy," Max said to Nick. "You go around on the other
side of the counter with your boy friend.”
"What's the idea ?" Nick asked.
"There isn’t any idea."
"You better go around, bright boy," Al said. Nick went around behind
the counter.
"What’s the idea ?" George asked.
“None of your damn business," Al said. "Who's out in the kitchen ?"
"The nigger."
"What do you mean the nigger ?”
"The nigger that cooks."
"Tell him to come in."
"What's the idea ?"
"Tell him to come in."
"Where do you think you are ?"
"We know damn well where we are," the man called Max said, "Do
we look silly ?"
"You talk silly," Al said to him. "What the hell do you argue with this
kid for ? Listen," he said to George, "tell the nigger to come out here."
READINGS IN AMERICAN LITERATURE Book |! - 11"What are you going to do to him ?"
"Nothing. Use your head, brightboy. What would we do to anigger?"
George opened the slit that opened back into the kitchen. "Sam,"
he called. "Come in here a minute."
The door to the kitchen opened and the nigger came in. "What was
it ?" he asked. The two men at the counter took a look at him.
"All right, nigger. You stand right there," Al said.
Sam, the nigger, standing in his apron, looked at the two men sitting
at the counter. "Yes, sir," he said. Al got down from his stool.
"Pm going back to the kitchen with the nigger and bright boy," he
said. "Go on back to the kitchen, nigger. You go with him, bright boy.”
The little man walked after Nick and Sam, the cook, back into the
kitchen. The door shut after them. The man called Max sat at the
counter opposite George. He didn’t look at George but looked in the
mirror that ran along back of the counter. Henry’s had been made over
from a saloon into a lunch counter.
"Well, bright boy," Max said, looking into the mirror, "why don’t you
say something 2"
"What's it all about ?"
"Hey, Al," Max called, "bright boy wants to know whatit’s all about."
"Why don’t you tell him ?" Al’s voice came from the kitchen.
"What do you think it’s all about 2"
"I don’t know."
"What do you think ?"
Max looked into the mirror all the time he was talking.
"I wouldn’t say."
"Hey, Al, bright boy says he wouldn’t say what he thinks it’s all
about."
“Il can hear you, all right," Al said from the kitchen. He had propped
open the slit that dishes passed through into the kitchen with a catsup
bottle. "Listen, bright boy," he said from the kitchen to George. "Stand
a little further along the bar. You move a little to the left, Max." He was
like a photographer arranging for a group picture.
"Talk to me, bright boy," Max said. "What do you think’s going to
happen ?"
12 - READINGS IN AMERICAN LITERATURE Book |!George did not say anything.
"Pil tell you," Max said. "We're going to kill a Swede. Do you know
a big Swede named Ole Andreson ?"
pyesin
"He comes here to eat every night, don’t he ?"
"Sometimes he comes here."
"He comes here at six o'clock, dont’ he ?"
"If he comes."
"We know all that, bright boy," Max said. "Talk about something
else. Ever go to the movies ?"
"Once in a while."
"You ought to go to the movies more. The movies are fine for a
bright boy like you." i
"What are you going to kill Ole Andreson for ? What did he ever do
to you ?"
"He never had a chance to do anything to us. He never even seen
us."
"And he’s only going to see us once," Al said from the kitchen.
"What are you going to kill him for, then ?" George asked.
"We're killing him for a friend. Just to oblige a friend, bright boy."
"Shut up," said Al from the kitchen. "You talk too goddamn much."
"Well, | got to keep bright boy amused. Don’t |, bright boy ?"
"You talk too damn much," Al said. "The nigger and my bright boy
are amused by themselves. I got them tied up like a couple of girl
friends in a convent."
"| suppose you were in a convent."
"You never know."
"You were in a kosher convent. That's where you were."
George looked up at the clock.
"If anybody comes in you tell them the cook is off, and if they keep
after it, you tell them you'll go back and cook yourself. Do you get that,
bright boy ?"
“All right," George said. "What you going to do with us afterward ?"
"That'll depend," Max said. "That's one of those things you never
READINGS IN AMERICAN LITERATURE Book I! - 13know at the time."
George looked up at the clock. It was a quarter past six. The door
from the street opened. A street-car motorman came in.
"Hello, George," he said. "Can I get supper ?"
"Sam's gone out," George said. "He'll be back in about half an hour."
"I'd better go up the street," the motorman said. George looked at
the clock. It was twenty minutes past six.
"That was nice, bright boy," Max said. "You're a regular little
gentleman."
"He knew I'd blow his head off," Al said from the kitchen.
said Max. "It ain’t that. Bright boy is nice. He’s a nice boy. I
like him."
At six-fifty-five George said : "He’s not coming."
Two other people had been in the lunchroom. Once George had
gone out to the kitchen and made a ham-and-egg sandwich "to go"
that a man wanted to take with him. Inside the kitchen he saw Al, his
derby hat tipped back, sitting on a stool beside the wicket with the
muzzle of a sawed-off shotgun resting on the ledge. Nick and the cook
were back to back in the corner, a towel tied in each of their mouths,
George had cooked the sandwich, wrapped it up in oiled paper, put
it in a bag, brought it in, and the man had paid for it and gone out.
"Bright boy can do everything," Max said. "He can cook and
everything. You’d make some girl a nice wife, bright boy."
"Yes ?" George said. "Your friend, Ole Andreson, isn’t going to come."
"We'll give him ten minutes," Max said.
Max watched the mirror and the clock. The hands of the clock
marked seven o'clock, and then five minutes Past seven.
"Come on, Al," said Max. "We better go. He’s not coming."
"Better give him five minutes," Al said from the kitchen.
In the five minutes a man came in, and George explained that the
cook was sick.
"Why the hell don’t you get another cook ?" the man asked, “Aren't
you running a lunch counter ?" He went out.
"Come on, Al," Max said.
"What about the two bright boys and the nigger ?"
14 - READINGS IN AMERICAN LITERATURE Book Ii"They're all right." |
"You think so ?"
"Sure. We're through with it.”
"| don’t like it," said Al. "It’s sloppy. You talk too much."
"Oh, what the hell," said Max. "We got to keep amused, haven't
‘we 2"
"You talk too much, all the same," Al said. He came out from the
kitchen. The cut-off barrels of the shotgun on a slight bulge under
the waist of his too tight-fitting overcoat. He straightened his coat with
his gloved hands.
"So long, bright boy," he said to George. "You got a lot of luck."
"That's the truth," Max said. "You ought to [play the races, bright boy."
The two of them went out the door. George watched them, through
the window, pass under the arc light and cross the street. In their tight
overcoats and derby hats they looked like a vaudeville team. George
went back through the swinging door into the kitchen and untied Nick
and the cook. |
"| don’t want any more of that," said Sai the cook. "I don’t want
any more of that,"
Nick stood up. He had never had a tw in his mouth before.
"Say," he said. "What the hell ?" He was trying to swagger it off.
"They were going to kill Ole Andreson," George said. "They were
going to shoot him when he came in to eat."
"Ole Andreson ?"
"Sure."
The cook felt the corners of his mouth with his thumbs.
"They all gone ?" he asked.
"Yeah," said George. "They're gone now."
"| don’t like it," said the cook. "I don’t like any of it at all.”
"Listen," George said to Nick. "You better go see Ole Andreson."
“All right."
"You better not have anything to do with it at all," Sam, the cook,
said: "You better stay way out of it."
“Don’t go if you don’t want to," George said.
READINGS IN AMERICAN LITERATURE Book II - 15"Mixing up in this ain’t going to get you anywhere," the cook said.
"You stay out of it."
"Tl go see him," Nick said to George. "Where does he live ?"
The cook turned away.
"Lite boys always know what they want to do," he said.
"He lives up at Hirsch’s rooming house," George said to Nick.
"Pll go up there."
Outside the arc light shone through the bare branches of a tree.
Nick walked up the street beside the car tracks and turned at the next
arc light down a side street. Three houses up the street was Hirsch’s
rooming house. Nick walked up the two steps and pushed the bell. A
woman came to the door.
"Is Ole Andreson here ?"
"Do you want to see him ?"
"Yes, if he’s in."
Nick followed the woman up a flight of stairs and back to the end
of a corridor. She knocked on the door.
"Who is it 2"
"It's somebody to see you, Mr. Andreson," the woman said.
"It’s Nick Adams."
"Come in.”
Nick opened the door and went into the room. Ole Andreson was
lying on the bed with all his clothes on. He had been a heavyweight
prize-fighter and he was too long for the bed. He lay with his head on
two pillows. He did not look at Nick.
"What was it?" he asked.
"L was up at Henry’s," Nick said, "and two fellows came in and tied
up me and the cook, and they said they were going to kill you."
It sounded silly when he said it. Ole Andreson said nothing.
"They put us out in the kitchen," Nick went on. "They were going
to shoot you when you came in to supper."
Ole Andreson looked at the wall and did not say anything.
"George thought I better come and tell you about it.”
"There isn’t anything I can do about it," Ole Andreson said.
16 - READINGS IN AMERICAN LITERATURE Book |!"Tl tell you what they were like."
"| don’t want to know what they were like," Ole Andreson said. He
looked at the wall. "Thanks for coming to tell me about it.”
"That's all right.”
Nick looked at the big man lying on the bed.
"Don’t you want me to go and see the police ?"
"No," Ole Andreson said. "That wouldn't do any good."
"Isn’t there something I could do ?"
"No. There ain’t anything to do."
"Maybe it was just a bluff."
"No. It ain’t just a bluff."
Ole Andreson rolled over toward the wall.
"The only thing is," he said, talking toward the wall, "I just can’t
make up my mind to go out. | been in here all day."
"Couldn't you get out of town ?"
"No," Ole Andreson said. "I’m through with all that running around."
He looked at the wall.
"There ain’t anything to do now."
"Couldn’t you fix it up some way ?"
"No. | got in wrong." He talked in the same flat voice. "There ain’t
anything to do. After a while I'll make up my mind to go out.”
"I better go back and see George," Nick said.
"So long,” said Ole Andreson. He did not look toward Nick. "Thanks
for coming around."
Nick went out. As he shut the door he saw Ole Andreson with all
his clothes on, lying on the bed looking at the wall.
"He’s been in his room all day," the landlady said downstairs. "I
guess he don’t feel well. I said to him : ’Mr. Andreson, you ought to go
out and take a walk on a nice fall day like this,’ but he didn’t feel like
at
"He doesn’t want to go out."
"Pm sorry he don’t feel well," the woman said. "He’s an awfully nice
man. He was in the ring, you know."
"| know it."
READINGS IN AMERICAN LITERATURE Book II - 17"You'd never know it except from the way his face is," the woman
said. They stood talking just inside the street door. "He's just as gentle."
"Well, good-night, Mrs. Hirsch," Nick said.
"I'm not Mrs. Hirsch," the woman said. "She owns the place. | just
look after it for her. I'm Mrs. Bell."
"Well, good-night, Mrs. Bell," Nick said.
"Good-night," the woman said.
Nick walked up the dark street to the corner under the arc light,
and then along the car tracks to Henry’s eating house. George was
inside, back of the counter.
"Did you see Ole ?"
"Yes," said Nick. "He’s in his room and he won't go out."
The cook opened the door from the kitchen when he heard Nick’s
voice.
"I don’t even listen to it," he said and shut the door.
"Did you tell him about it ?" George asked.
"Sure. I told him but he knows what it’s all about."
"What's he going to do ?"
“Nothing.”
"They'll kill him."
"I guess they will."
"He must have got mixed up in something in Chicago."
"I guess so," said Nick.
"It’s a hell of a thing."
"It's an awful thing," Nick said.
They did not say anything. George reached down for a towel and
wiped the counter.
"| wonder what he did ?" Nick said.
"Double-crossed somebody. That’s what they kill them for."
"I'm going to get out of this town," Nick said.
"Yes," said George. "That’s a good thing to do."
"I can’t stand to think about him waiting in the room and knowing
he’s going to get it. It’s too damned awful.”
"Well," said George, "you better not think about it."
18 - READINGS IN AMERICAN LITERATURE Book IiINTERPRETATION
There are certain fairly obvious points to be made about the
technique of this story. It breaks up into one long scene and three short
scenes. Indeed, the method is so thoroughly scenic that not over three
or four sentences are required to make the transitions. The focus of
narration is objective throughout, practically all information being
conveyed in simple realistic dialogue. In the first scene the revelation
of the mission of the gangsters is accomplished through a few
significant details - the fact that the gangsters eat with gloves (to avoid
leaving fingerprints), the fact that they keep their eyes on the mirror
behind the bar, the fact that, after Nick and the cook have been tied
up, the gangster who has the shotgun at the service window stations
his friend and George out front "like a photographer arranging for a
group picture". all of this before the specific nature of their mission is
made clear.
Other observations concerning the technique of the story could be
made - the cleverness of composition, the subtlety with which the
suspense is maintained in the first scene by the banter of the gangsters,
and then is transferred to another level in the second scene. But such
observations, though they are worth making, do not answer the first
question which, to the reader, usually presents itself, or should be
allowed to present itself. That question is : what is the story about ?
The importance of giving an early answer to this question is
indicated by the fact that a certain kind of reader, upon first
acquaintance with the story, is inclined to feel that the story is exhausted
in the first scene, and in fact that the first scene itself does not come
to focus - does not have a "point". Another kind of reader sees that the
first scene, with its lack of resolution, is really being used to "charge"
the second scene. He finds his point in Ole Andreson’s decision not
to try to escape the gangsters - to stop "all that running around". This
reader feels that the story should end here. He sees no relevance in
the last several pages of the story, and wonders why the author has
flattened out his effect. The first reader we may say, feels that "The
Killers" is the gangsters’ story - a story of action which does not come
off. The second and more sophisticated reader interprets it as
READINGS IN AMERICAN LITERATURE Book II - 19Andreson’s story, though perhaps with some wonder that Andreson’s
story has been approached so indirectly and is allowed to trail off so
irrelevantly. In other words, the reader is inclined to transpose the
question, What is the story ? into the question, Whose story is it? When.
he states the question in this way, he confronts the fact that Hemingway
has left the story focused not on the gangsters, nor on Andreson, but
on the boys at the lunchroom. Consider the last sentences of the story:
"lm going to get out of this town," Nick said.
"Yes," said George. "That’s a good thing to do."
"I can’t stand to think about him waiting in the room and knowing
he’s going to get it. It’s too damned awful."
"Well," said George, "you better not think about it."
So, of the two boys, it is obviously Nick on whom the impression
has been made. George has managed to come to terms with the
situation. By this line of reasoning, it is Nick’s story. And the story is
about the discovery of evil. The theme, ina sense, is the Hamlet theme,
or the theme of Sherwood Anderson’s "I Want to Know Why".
This definition of the theme of the story, even if it appears
acceptable, must, of course, be tested against the detailed structure.
In evaluating the story, as well as in understanding it, the skill with
which the theme has been assimilated must be taken into account.
For instance, to put a concrete question : does the last paragraph of
the story illuminate for the reader certain details which had, at their
first appearance, seemed to be merely casual, realistic items ? If we
take the theme to be the boy’s discovery of evil, several such details
do find their fulfillment and meaning. Nick had been bound and gagged
by the gangsters, and has been released by George. To quote : "Nick
stood up. He had never had a towel in his mouth before. ’Say,’ he said.
What the hell ?’ He was trying to swagger it off." Being gagged was
something you read about in a thriller and not something which
happened to you; and the first effect is one of excitement, almost
pleasurable, certainly an excuse for a manly pose. (It may be worth
noting in this connection that Hemingway uses the specific word towel
and not the general word gag. It is true that the word fowel has a
certain sensory advantage over the word gag - because it suggests the
20 - READINGS IN AMERICAN LITERATURE Book IIcoarseness of the fabric and the unpleasant drying effect on the
membranes of the mouth. But this advantage in immediacy is probably
overshadowed by another : the towel is sanctified in the thriller as the
gag, and here that cliché of the thriller has come true.) The way the
whole incidentis given- "He had never hada towel in his mouth before"-
charges the apparently realistic detail as a pointer to the final discovery.
Another pointer appears in the gangster’s wisecrack about the
movies : "You ought to go to the movies more. The movies are fine for
a bright boy like you." In one sense, of course, the iterated remarks
about the movies, coming just after the gangsters have made their
arrangements in the lunchroom, serve as a kind of indirect exposition:
the reader knows the standard reason and procedure for gang killings.
But at another level, these remarks emphasize the discovery that the
unreal clichés of horror have a reality.
The boy to whom the gangster speaks understands the allusion to
the movies, for he immediately asks : "What are you going to kill Ole
Andreson for ? What did he ever do to you ?"
"He never had a chance to do anything to us. He never even seen
us," the gangster replies. The gangster accepts, and even glories a little
in, the terms by which he lives-terms which transcend the small-town
world. He lives, as it were, by a code, which lifts him above questions
of personal likes or personal animosities. This unreal code-unreal
because it denies the ordinary personal elements of life - has, like the
gag, suddenly been discovered as real. This unreal and theatrical quality
is reflected in the description of the gangsters as, after leaving the
lunchroom, they go out under the arc light and cross the street : "In
their tight overcoats and derby hats they looked like a vaudeville team."
It even permeates their dialogue. The dialogue itself has the sleazy
quality of mechanized gag and wisecrack, a kind of inflexible and
stereotyped banter that is always a priori to the situation and overrides
the situation. On this level the comparison to the vaudeville team is a
kind of explicit summary of details which have been presented more
indirectly and dramatically. On another level, the weary and artificial
quality of their wit has a grimmer implication. It is an index to the
professional casualness with which they accept a situation which to
the boys is shocking. They are contemptuous and even bored, with
the contempt and boredom of the initiated when confronted by callow
READINGS IN AMERICAN LITERATURE Book |! - 21lay observers. This code, which has suddenly been transferred from
the artificial world of the thriller and movie into reality, is shocking
enough, but even more shocking to Nick is the fact that Ole Andreson,
the hunted man, accepts the code too. Confronted by the news which
Nick brings, he rejects all the responses which the boy would have
considered normal : he will not call the police; he will not regard the
thing as a mere bluff; he will not leave town. "Couldn’t you fix it up
some way ?" the boy asks. "No. | got in wrong."
As we observed earlier, for a certain type of reader this is the high
point of the story, and the story should end here. If one is to convince
such a reader that the author is right in proceeding, one is obligated
to answer his question : What is the significance of the rather tame,
and apparently irrelevant, little incident which follows, the conversation
with Mrs. Bell ? It is sometimes said that Mrs. Bell serves to give a bit
of delayed exposition or even to point the story by gaining sympathy
for Andreson, who is, to her, "an awfully nice man," not at all like her
idea of a pugilist. But this is not enough to satisfy the keen reader, and
he is right in refusing to be satisfied with this. Mrs. Bell is, really, the
Porter at Hell Gate in Macbeth. She is the world of normality, which is
shocking now from the very fact that it continues to flow on in its usual
course. To her, Ole Andreson is just a nice man , despite the fact that
he has been in the ring; he ought to go out and take his walk on such
anice day. She points to his ordinary individuality, which is in contrast
to the demands of the mechanical code. Even if the unreal horror of
the movie thriller has become real, even if the hunted man lies upstairs
on his bed trying to make up his mind to go out, Mrs. Bell is still Mrs.
Bell. She is not Mrs. Hirsch. Mrs. Hirsch owns ine place, she just looks
after it for Mrs. Hirsch. She is Mrs. Bell.
At the door of the rooming house Nick has met Mrs. Bell - normality
unconscious of the ironical contrast it presents. Back at the lunchroom,
Nick returns to the normal scene, but the normal scene conscious of
the impingement of horror. It is the same old lunchroom, with George
and the cook going about their business. But they, unlike Mrs. Bell,
know what has happened. Yet even they are scarcely deflected from
their ordinary routine. George and the cook represent two different
levels of response to the situation. The cook, from the first, has wanted
no part of it. When he hears Nick’s voice, on his return, he says, "I
22 - READINGS IN AMERICAN LITERATURE Book 1!don’t even listen to it." And he shuts the door. But George had originally
suggested that Nick go see Andreson, telling him, however, "Don’t go
if you don’t want to." After Nick has told his story, George can comment,
"It’s a hell of a thing," but George, in one sense at least, has accepted
the code, too. When Nick says : "I wonder what he did ?" George
replies, with an echo of the killers’ own casualness : "Double-crossed
somebody. That’s what they kill them for." In other words, the situation
is shocking to the cook only in so far as it involves his own safety.
George is aware of other implications but can dismiss them. For neither
of them, does the situation mean the discovery of evil. But for Nick, it
is the discovery, for he has not yet learned to take George's adult
advice : "Well, you better not think about it."
To this point the discussion of "The Killers" has been concerned
with the structure of the story with regard to the relations among
incidents and with regard to the attitudes of the characters. But there
remain as important questions such items as the following : What is
Hemingway's attitude toward his material ? How does this attitude find
its expression ?
Perhaps the simplest approach to these questions may be through
a consideration of the situations and characters which interest
Hemingway. These situations are usually violent ones : the
hard-drinking and sexually promiscuous world of The Sun Also Rises;
the chaotic and brutal world of war as in A Farewell to Arms, For Whom
the Bell Tolls, or "A Way You'll Never Be"; the dangerous and exciting
world of the bull ring or the prize ring as in The Sun Also Rises, Death
in the Afternoon, "The Undefeated," "Fifty Grand"; the world of crime,
as in "The Killers," To Have and to Have Not, or "The Gambler, the
Nun, and the Radio." Hemingway’s typical characters are usually tough
men, experienced in the hard worlds they inhabit, and apparently
insensitive : Lieutenant Henry in A Farewell to Arms, the big-game
hunter in "The Snows of Kilimanjaro," Robert Jordan in For Whom the
Bell Tolls, or even Ole Andreson. They are, also, usually defeated men.
Out of their practical defeat, however, they have managed to salvage
something. And here we come upon Hemingway's basic interest in
such situations and such characters. They are not defeated except
upon their own terms; some of them have even courted defeat;
certainly, they have maintained, even in the practical defeat, an ideal
READINGS IN AMERICAN LITERATURE Book II - 23of themselves, formulated or unformulated, by which they have lived.
Hemingway's attitude is, ina sense, like that of Robert Louis Stevenson,
as Stevenson states it in one of his essays, "Pulvis et Umbra" :
"Poor soul, here for so little, cast among so many hardships, filled
with desires so incommensurate and so inconsistent, savagely
surrounded, savagely descended, irremediably condemned to prey
upon his fellow lives : who should have blamed him had he been of
a piece with his destiny and a being merely barbarous ? And we look
and behold him instead filled with imperfect virtues : ... an ideal of
decency, to which he would risé if it were possible; a limit of shame,
below which, if it be possible, he will not stoop ... Manis indeed marked
for failure in his efforts to do right. But where the best consistently
miscarry, how tenfold more remarkable that all should continue to
Strive; and surely we should find it both touching and inspiriting, that
in a field from which success is banished, our race should not cease
tolabor... It matters not where we look, under what climate we observe
him, in what stage of society, in what depth of ignorance, burthened
with what erroneous morality; by campfires in Assiniboia, the snow
powdering his shoulders, the wind plucking his blanket, as he sits,
passing the ceremonial calumet and uttering his grave opinions like a
Roman senator; in ships at sea, a man inured to hardship and vile
pleasures, his brightest hope a fiddle in a tavern and a bedizened trull
who sells herself to rob him, and he for all that, simple, innocent,
cheerful, kindly like a child, constant to toil, brave to drown, for others;
... in the brothel, the discard of society, living mainly on strong drink,
fed with affronts, a fool, a thief, the comrade of thieves, and even here
keeping the point of honor and the touch of pity, often repaying the
world’s scorn with service, often standing firm upon a scruple, and at
a certain cost, rejecting riches; - everywhere some virtue cherished or
affected, everywhere some decency of thought and carriage,
everywhere the ensign of man’s ineffectual goodness under every
circumstance of failure, without hope, without health, without thanks,
still obscurely fighting the lost fight of virtue, still clinging, in the brothel
or on the scaffold, to some rag of honor, the poor jewel of their souls !
They may seek to escape, and yet they cannot; it is not alone their
privilege and glory, but their doom, they are condemned to some
nobility ..."
24 - READINGS IN AMERICAN LITERATURE Book IIFor Stevenson, the world in which this drama is played out is,
objectively considered, a violent and meaningless world - "our rotary
island loaded with predatory life and more drenched with blood ...
than ever mutinied ship, scuds through space." This is Hemingway's
world, too. But its characters, at least those whose story Hemingway
cares to‘tell, make one gallant effort to redeem the incoherence and
meaninglessness of this world : they attempt to impose some form
upon the disorder of their lives, the ‘technique of the bullfighter or
sportsman, the discipline of the soldier, the code of the gangster, which,
even though brutal and dehumanizing, has its own ethic. (Ole Andreson
is willing to take his medicine without whining. Or the dying Mexican
in "The Gambler, the Nun, and the Radio" refuses to squeal, despite
the detective’s argument : "One can, with honor, denounce one’s
assailant.") The form is never quite adequate to subdue the world, but
the fidelity to it is part of the gallantry of defeat.
It has been said above that the typical Hemingway character is
tough and, apparently, insensitive. But only apparently, for the fidelity
to acode, to a discipline, may be an index to a sensitivity which allows
the characters to see, at moments, their true plight. At times, and
usually at times of stress, it is the tough man, for Hemingway, the
disciplined man, who actually is aware of pathos or tragedy. The
individual toughness (which may be taken to be the private discipline
demanded by the world), may find itself in conflict with some more
natural and spontaneous human emotion; in contrast with this the
discipline may, even, seem to be inhuman; but the Hemingway hero,
though he is aware of the claims of this spontaneous human emotion,
is afraid to yield to those claims because he has learned that the only
way to hold on to "honor", to individuality, to, even, the human order
as against the brute chaos of the world, is to live by his code. This is
the irony of the situation in which the hero finds himself. Hemingway's
heroes are aristocrats in the sense that they are the initiate, and practice
a lonely virtue.
Hemingway’s heroes utter themselves, not in rant and bombast,
but in terms of ironic understatement. This understatement, stemming
from the contrast between the toughness and the sensitivity, the
violence and the sensitivity, is a constant aspect of Hemingway's
READINGS IN AMERICAN LITERATURE Book I! - 25