Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Film Analysis
Film Analysis
In order to do a convincing formal analysis, you'll need to be familiar with certain key terms (outlined for you in the
“glossary of film terms handout” and each chapter overview). Returning to the tractor analogy: it's helpful to be able to
understand and to use terms like "carburetor" when you take a tractor apart - especially if you hope to explain your
process to an onlooker.
For example, ask yourself: Who made the film? Find out who directed the film, and what other films this director
made. If you've seen some of these other films, you'll have a better understanding of the themes and genres that the
director is interested in.
What is the production history of the film? See if you can find out anything about the conditions under which the film
was made. Apocalypse Now, for example, has an interesting production history, in terms of its financing, casting, writing,
and so on. Knowing something about the film's production can help you to understand some of the aesthetic and
cinematic choices that the director has made.
What do the critics and scholars say? Reading what others have said about the film before you see it may help you to
focus your observations. If a film is particularly well known for the editing of a certain scene (the shower scene in
Hitchcock's Psycho, for example), you'll want to pay close attention to the editing when you view the film.
What can you learn from the film's genre? Before you see the film, think a bit about the norms and limitations of its
genre. When you view the film, you can then consider how these limitations are obeyed or stretched. For example, Clint
Eastwood's Unforgiven is a western that challenges its genre's typical notions of good guy vs. bad guy. Knowing how this
dynamic plays itself out in other westerns helps you to understand and to appreciate Eastwood's accomplishment.
Does the film reflect an interesting cultural phenomenon? Sometimes a professor will ask you to watch certain films
because he wants you to examine a cultural phenomenon - for example, the phenomenon of stardom. Accordingly, you
might watch The Scarlet Letter with the idea of viewing it as a "star vehicle," contributing to Demi Moore's star persona.
Note that this sort of paper may also be a discussion of formal analysis: for example, you might discuss how Demi Moore
was lit in certain scenes to emphasize her position as Hollywood star.
From: http://www.reference.com/browse/wiki/Cinematic_techniques
Cinematic techniques are methods employed by film makers to communicate meaning, entertain, and to
produce a particular emotional or psychological response in an audience. Cinematographic techniques
such as the choice of shot, and camera movement, can greatly influence the structure and meaning of a
film.
Distance of shot
The use of different shots can influence the meaning which an audience will interpret:
Close-up: May be used to show tension;
Extreme close-up: Focuses on a single facial feature, such as lips;
Medium shot
Long shot
Establishing shot: Mainly used at a new location to give the audience a sense of locality.
Camera angles
These are used extensively to communicate meaning and emotion about characters:
Low angle shot: Looking up at a character or object, often to instill fear or awe in the audience;
Straight angle shot
High angle shot: Looking down on a character, often to show vulnerability or weakness;
Canted or Oblique: The camera is tilted to show the scene at an angle. This is used extensively in
the horror and science fiction genre. The audience will often not consciously realize the change.
Mise en scene
"Mise en scene" refers to what is colloquially known as "the Set", but is applied more generally to refer to
everything that is presented before the camera. With various techniques, film makers can use the Mise En
Scene to produce intended effects.
Provided in this list of film techniques is a categorized (and then alphabetized) list of techniques used in
film (motion pictures).
Costume
Use of motif, and associated meaning;
Use of color, and its emotional response; and
Props
Sound
Diegetic sound: It is any sound where the source is visible on the screen, or is implied to be
present by the action of the film:
Voices of characters;
Sounds made by objects in the story; and
Music, represented as coming from instruments in the story space.
Music coming from reproduction devices such as record players, radios, tape players etc.
Narrator's commentary;
Voice of God;
Sound effect which is added for dramatic effect;
Mood music; and
Film Score
Non-diegetic sound plays a big role in creating atmosphere and mood within a film.
Sound effects
In motion picture and television production, a sound effect is a sound recorded and presented to
make a specific storytelling or creative point, without the use of dialogue or music. The term
often refers to a process, applied to a recording, without necessarily referring to the recording
itself. In professional motion picture and television production, the segregations between
recordings of dialogue, music, and sound effects can be quite distinct, and it is important to
understand that in such contexts, dialogue and music recordings are never referred to as sound
effects, though the processes applied to them, such as reverberation or flanging, often are.
Film Theory
Film theory debates the essence of the cinema and provides conceptual frameworks for
understanding film's relationship to reality, the other arts, individual viewers, and society at large.
Like traditional literature, critical theories also apply to films. Here are some theories specifically
built around film, and discussions of traditional ones as they relate to film. All information here
is from: <http://www.reference.com/browse/wiki/Film_theory>. Please feel free to investigate on
your own.
Apparatus theory
Apparatus theory, derived in part from Marxist film theory, semiotics, and
psychoanalysis, was a dominant theory within cinema studies during the 1970s. It
maintains that cinema is by nature ideological because its mechanics of representation are
ideological. Its mechanics of representation include the camera and editing. The central
position of the spectator within the perspective of the composition is also ideological.
Apparatus theory also argues that cinema maintains the dominant ideology of the culture
within the viewer. Ideology is not imposed on cinema, but is part of its nature.
Auteur theory
In film criticism, the 1950s-era auteur theory holds that a director's films reflects that
director's personal creative vision, as if he or she were the primary "auteur" (the French
word for 'author'). In some cases, film producers are considered to have a similar "auteur"
role for films that they have produced.
Auteur theory has had a major impact on film criticism ever since it was advocated by
film director and film critic François Truffaut in 1954. "Auteurism" is the method of
analyzing films based on this theory or, alternately, the characteristics of a director's work
that makes her or him an auteur. Both the auteur theory and the auteurism method of film
analysis are frequently associated with the French New Wave and the film critics who
wrote for the influential French film review periodical Cahiers du cinéma.
Or one might consider the synthesis of several elements, such as editing, shot
composition, and music. The shoot-out that ends Sergio Leone's Spaghetti Western
"Dollars" trilogy is a valid example of how these elements work together to produce an
effect: The shot selection goes from very wide to very close and tense; the length of shots
decreases as the sequence progresses towards its end; the music builds. All of these
elements, in combination rather than individually, create tension.
The viewing subject may be offered particular identifications (usually with a leading
male character) from which to watch. The theory stresses the subject's longing for a
completeness which the film may appear to offer through identification with an image; in
fact, according to Lacanian theory, identification with the image is never anything but an
illusion and the subject is always split simply by virtue of coming into existence.
Screen theory
Screen theory is a Marxist film theory associated with the British journal Screen in the
1970s. The theoreticians of this approach -- Colin MacCabe, Stephen Heath or Laura
Mulvey -- describe the "cinematic apparatus" as a version of Althusser's Ideological State
Apparatus (ISA). According to screen theory, it is the spectacle that creates the spectator
and not the other way round. The fact that the subject is created and subjected at the same
time by the narrative on screen is masked by the apparent realism of the communicated
content.
Socialist realism
For other meanings of the term realism, see realism (disambiguation).
Socialist realism is a teleologically-oriented style of realistic art which has as its purpose
the furtherance of the goals of socialism and communism. Although related, it should not
be confused with social realism, a type of art that realistically depicts subjects of social
concern.
An example of this is understanding how the simple combination of shots can create an
additional idea: the blank expression on a man's face, a piece of cake, and then back to
the man's face. While nothing in this sequence literally expresses hunger—or desire—the
juxtaposition of the images convey that meaning to the audience.
Unraveling this additional meaning can become quite complex. Lighting, angle, shot
duration, juxtaposition, cultural context, and a wide array of other elements can actively
reinforce or undermine a sequence's meaning.
Resources
Online resources (you may have best luck when searching the web or databases, if
you search for “motion pictures.”)
Sample criticism/writings
Good sample with visuals so that you can see how a film analysis is developed
http://classes.yale.edu/film-analysis/
A good sample critical article about Land of the Dead from the Film Journal
http://www.thefilmjournal.com/issue13/landofthedead.html