Sociolinguistics
Sect Reding
led by JB, Pie and Janet Hes
Penguin Booksee
18 D.H.Hymes
ie
(0m Communicative Competence
xcept rom DH. tyme: On Commu Compe, Psd
1
“This papers theoretical Oneconnotaion of theoreticalis "programa";
{Trelaed onaotation that one kaows 00 litle abou he suet ay
onmetung practic. Both connotation apply otis attempt oconebute
{othe study of tho "language problems of disadvantaged biren’
‘races! work, however st have an eye on the curen state of theory,
for it san be plded or misguided, encouraged or discouraged, by what it
| fakes that state to be. Moreover, the language development of ciren has
atic petinence jst sow for theory. The fundamental theme ofthis
Daperi tht the theoretical aod the practical problems converse
Tr ix pot that there exits « body of linguistic theory that practical
research sa tra to and fas only 1 apply ti rather that work mot-
‘ed by prota! needs may Delp build the theory that we seed. To a
‘est cxent programs to change the language situation of cen are an
‘rem to apply abuse science that does aot et ei. Let me review the
present tage of nguisti heory 0 show why thi 30.
‘Conder reat safeent, ope that makes explicit end precise en
assumption that as underiain moch of moder linguistics (Chomsky,
1968, p.3)
Linguist tery contre pri with an eal speaker see, [9 &
Let homens spac coms, who uoows is aigunaepeealy
SSTENSEatnby sch gmstily eer condtons a reo Hit
‘To nests tie fenton and inert and eos (ngom oe cars
OnaS ir apnvng hs Knowl oft lngvge i el penance
sia Sims Aas Bans a ie Pt
Ceuesege i wi to tune Dr tet Bale and Be Emad Gordo of
DM tymes 28—————————————————————Ee
From the stndpoin of te children we sok to understand and el,
such staterent may seem almost declaration of itlevance, All the
Siiculies chat confront the hire and outeles sem sven om view
‘One's response fo sich an indeation of the sate of linguists theory
sight bet fore Fundamental theory and to pick and choose amon ts
Droduets, Modes f language siveture, fel can be wel in aye ot
‘nvsloncd inthe statement of ther auzor. Some linguist eg, Labon,
Rowenbuum, Gletman) use earsformational generative grammar to tly
some of the ways in wihich «speech comunity not homogeneous and
Inwhich speaker istenes clay have eifeentil knowledge of suas
Peshaps, then, one ough simpy te dstepard how lings deine the
Scope of linguistic" theory. One could point to several avis dels of
language - TragerSit-Joos,tagnemic, statifeationsl, transform
tionalgeneratve in its MIT, Ponnsjvania, Harvard and ober varia),
and, in Englind, ‘sjstemstrvctue" (Haliday and othr); remark that
there are distinguished scholars uring each to analyse Engh eae! tat
linguists are unable to agree on the analysis of Engh; and pick nd
choose, according to ones problem and loca! susion, leaving ara
‘mayians otherwise o thar own devies
“Todoso would tea mistake for two ressont on the one hand, the sort
of theoretical perspective quoted above fetevant aways that ti impor-
tant always fo have in mind; on the otber hand, tere ea body of lie
‘iste data and problens that would be lft withoot there isi,
Hf such limited conception of linguistic theory were to rain in:
callers
“The speci relevance of the theoretical perspective ie expressed in it
representative anecdote (to use Keaeth Burke's term) he lng tps
bore our eyes. The images that of cil, born with the bility fo master
ny language with almost miraelous ea and speed a child who hot
merely molded by conditioning and reinforcement, but who actively
proceeds withthe unconscious theoreti interpretation of the speech
that comes its way, 0 that in few years ad with inte epeiene, Hi
maser of an inte ably, that of producing and understanding in
Principe any and all gammatcal sentences of langage, The image (or
‘heoreial perspective) expresses the essential equality cir jst
Jnuman tengs. eis mole in that can spire one with the el hat ven
‘the mos espcing conditions canbe transformed; its an inispensabie
‘weapon aginst views thit would explain the communicative aflrences
“mang groupe of cilren a labret, perhaps ri
The limitations ofthe perspective appear whea the inege of the enol
ing, mastering, Huet eff set Beside the zal ciiren in our schools
“Thethcory mustseem,iTntiereeant, then at best a dotinco poigney
270 Acruiton ane Proteney
pian, tc of he ene fewer wht oni 08 hat
sect: pagram to, bee he hor so power inte ov fh
Saat enters cope sith he ence To cope whe eis of
Shien a conmuniening His reqres hry iin wc ecoe
Sa oor uve an etl an onstrate
Frenne msorteinsomatinletenent
tor word tng ory har two part: Ingusie compere an
thst perfomance Lingus competence i understood coed
ihene koonde of nace ste tt, kote hats
Toronly nt coscos or aie for spontaneous repr bu acs.
‘Sry ic nw te Gee serene on sy The rey
Sine of leo to prone for an expt acoun of soc Knees,
{Ehsan in tela to the fate ote on With mst depend
Sista ens ofc know tt one on prod td vdestand
In ene ht ngs on pk of ee
‘renege, Limits pestrmarc men eit undesioo oa-
eal pen oen ered exe
Sct they of compet pots el objects in absaon from
ssc! eu tar mit ene nt ther iin, Aun
SP SSacace hb sen ab onl ndoenent of Sosa
Sarr ting on se seh neon of cl
‘Fas theny of perfomance the one sei tht might bute a
Stouescocaara coment; bt mieeqted witha theory of lange
Si ennsly comet hosing tien oe
‘aif grammar at; hoc teracton. As conse
‘Se forsecocatunlxtrnthesequtition conduct of eormanc,
{he aultude wuld sum que meptve Lite or none sd nd
‘Srting rs one wou expt oe decry. Some specs
STputomenc ars ras ers ving comic rl he
Sheng rat beipsuign noes prop fo snes, bo 1 he
‘Slee gunel thous ead however, and be sans of
Performance bentens he chape om which pssage comes ae
‘Sone, lfesea that he noe ck spre one ainiation,
{For aay. When the notion of prformats node he
{tae etaamge la cous stations sired sted that
Ship onder the Teton sumed could pecormune dell reset
‘Spence end hati al fat eis oul oA std of
Stunt cs sho numero se srs eviatons from rt
Shropsopcn milous on: Onespeaksof rma Ings
Stes tay dgeerate esi (chor, 168, p31), 0 ean of
‘butt peta at “olan of et compact a
Dik Mymes or1967,» 148). While performance” is someting of eid eatepory for
the theory, ery is moe salen connotation is that of imperfet mani
fesation of undetling stm,
dot think the lar 1o provide an expic ple fo soeiostura
fears to be aesidentl. The etiston of competence othe nations of 9
‘homogeneous community, perfext knosledge, and independence of socio-
tua ators does ol ser jut a simplifying escurmptio, te sort tha
Soy siete theory mst mink. I that eres, then some remark oat
‘ect ight be mde; the ned to nce a sococultual dmenslon right
be enone; the nature of such ieision might even be soegested. Nor
ess the predominant asseition of performance with imperfection ecm
scidental. Certainly, any sch of speech is an imperfect indication of
the knowlege that uadetes it. For users that sare the Knowede, the
rangement might be thought of as eficlent. Aad if one uses oas's
uitlons 38 to speech, a8 well sto grammac, ove can see tit What to
“Brammer is imperfect, or unaccounted fr, maybe the aul acomplish-
“fpeut ofa soil act (Gari, in press), orth patterned, spontaneous
‘Bidens of probem solving and conceptual thougit Jobs, 1967, p. 5.
“ese things might be acknowledged, even if at taken up.
| Teisks the absence of place for sococultival factor, and te aking
‘of performance to imperfeton, 0 disclose an ideological aspect 0 the
theoretical standpoint Is, iT may sy 0, rather a Garden of Eden view
Hiuman life sums divided between grammatical competence, an ideal
Inately-erved sort of power, and performance, an exaeacy rather kee
the enting ofthe appl, thrusting the perfect speaker-earer out into a
fallen world. OF this word here meanings may be won by the seat of
the bow, and communication achieved sn labor (Ct. Boahoer, 1965,
368), litle i said. The controling image is ofan abst, isolated
Individoa, elmost an unmotivated cogalve mechani, aot excep
Ineidantly 2 prion i «soil world.
‘Any theoretical stance of couse hasan ideological aspect, and that
spect of present ings theory stl inveation.A major characteristic
fof moders linguists has boon tat i takes structre as primary end i
island tends to depresnt se, while not relingushing any of it lit
to the pes signlfcance tat attached to language. (Contrast claseal
antguly, where sactre was « means tows, an the arammarian si
‘ordinate 1 the thetor) The result ean Sometimes sem a ery buppy one.
‘On the one hand, by narrowing concern 10 independently and ready
stroturble dat, one cn enjoy the prestige ofan svoed senor on
the oer hand, despite jgnoring the social dimensions of we, one els
‘e prestige of doling with something fundamental to human ie
Tuas ist, Chomsky i quit oes whan be writes that is conception
ofthe conestn of inguin theory seems 0 have been also the position of
{he founders of modern genera! lngustes. Cel f mer stuctra
linguistics msun, then a majo hrot of has ben te dee the subject
tater of linguistic theory In tere of what imo, In de Saussure's
Tinguisies as senealy interpreted, a langue ws the prvilee around oF
sHrcture, and lr parle the residual rela of aration (among other
Things. Chorsy ssosates ie views of competence and performance
‘vith the Savsrian coneeptioas of langue and parol, but ses his own
‘oncepons ae superior, ging beyond tbe conception of langue as
"stemati avetory of lam fo renewal of the Humboltsn coneption
ff underlying process. The Chomsky conception i suecor, aot only
in ths eespot, bt allo inthe very terminology neous 0 mat he
‘ifrene. "Competence" and "performance" much more ruil sugsest
‘ovate persons, situation, and aeons. Inded, from te standpoint of
the chase tadidon In stoctaral linguistics, Chomshy’s theoretical
‘andpoit isa once it reltlztion and is culmination. Ie cartes 10
it prtvtion the desire to dealin practice onl with what Is ineral to
Tanguage, ye o find la that interatty that in theory is ofthe widest or
‘eepst human siniance, No modeen guise theory has spoken more
profoundly of either the infernal strotae ofthe intasc human sini=
fsance
“This revitalization lowers while around it emerge the sprouts of ome
‘epton that before tbe end of te century msysucend I Isuch a succes
Son occur, wil be bres, jut asthe teasformational theory could
oor its predecestors and handle stoctra relationships beyond their
frp, 20 new restonips, elaonships wih an ineradiable socal
omponen, wll boom saint that will rogule 2 broader theory to
tbsorb and hao therm sal er to this torial conjecture at the
fd of this paper, Lette now sketch consiéerations that motivate &
bronder theory. And let me do this by Sst puting forvard an additonal
representative anecdote,
"
‘As agaist heist speakerstne, here is Bloom's account of one
‘yours Menon be Knew (1927, . 395).
‘White Thunder, an around fr peaks ee agit than Meo nt
{hata ston indemet for his Menon Is stacoae His vost) Is
‘ol hit lfton me ofa Srtaous: he conse setnces of fe
{rsabare nul, He aye sid t pe no neue tlrab. Hs cc is
‘ot uneoamon sang ounse me, een when hey speak ut ile English
Bloomfield aves onto sogest thatthe commonnes ofthe ese dun
some inet way, 10 the impact of the conquering language. Tn set,
D-H. Hymes 2SEE cae
hee hve eifeenal competence within a heterogeneous speech come
mony, both andoubtedly shaped by accularatio. (The aleative 1 &
onmittve role for the oovelrocigcltural factor ito assume that
ttocoun Menon was common also before coutact. If taken seriously,
the asumption sould sil impiate sococultaralfetor) Sov ie hes
affected aot merely outeard performance, bu inner competence ise
etme now review some ole iadiations of the need f transcend the
otis of perfect competence, homenencous speech communis, ead
independence of sociocultural Features
Ther excelent utile reviewing eecent tae of subeulrldierences
in language development In the United States, Caden (566, 9,19)
vite that on hing is les:
“The fins can te gic suranarie: on lhe meas, al he ae,
{he appr ancoeconamie satus ren, however dened, are moe ava
than loner socom suas ren.
‘The siferences reviowed by Cazden involve enabling fst for the
upper status cidren ost s much a dssbing elt for the lower tts
Chien. Moreover sven subeltraldifereaces in the pttrns and
purposes of anguage se, chile of the over satus may actually excel a
{spects of communicative competence not observed or measured in the
tents summarized. And among the Menemini there were not oaly YOUNE
fnen lke White Thunder, but alto those like Red Cloud Woman, sho
sets enti ih ios Meno nd speaks Oba and
FPoamaton fen. --- Linguistzly, she would corespood to a Bihy
oon Acein wen wh spoke, ty, Pench at Kalin fe aon 0
{he ey bot pe of cuit, omae Englsh (loon, 1927, 398)
“There at tribes ofthe nothest Amazon mong whom the normal scone
{OT linguistc competence fa ontol of a Tes fou languages, 8 spur
feive command coming during adolescence with repertoie and pesee-
tion of competence continang to be aurneted throughout ie Here a8
Inmoch of our Work, the ideally Duet spenkerseneris miata
(ven an idenly fest tonolingeal of course is master of funeional
Sarit witha the one angus)
In this connection fe should be noted that Auent members of com
unite offen regard thelr languages, or functions! varieties, as not
identical in communicative adequac. Te aot only tht one variety is
‘blignory ot prefered for some uses, other for others (asf offen the
‘ise, sy, 05 betwee pull osasons ad personal relationships), Sue
invwsons cect experince and slF-valtion as to what ve cn in ft
fo with a phen surety. This sort of eileen competence bos nothing
to do wth ‘sinadvantage or dfsiney relative 1 ter norms members
[the community. All of them may nd Kurdish, sy the median in
Athich mst ngs can beat Be expressed, but Arabic the btr med or
‘Ripous tus uses of Berber may find Arabic superior to Berber for ll,
Derposes ence intiate domestic conversation (Ferzson, 1956.
“The combination of coramunsy