Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Completed Action Research-8th Congress
Completed Action Research-8th Congress
ADDRESSING CLASSROOM
ABSENTEEISM AMONG
IDENTIFIED GRADE 10
STUDENTS THROUGH PROJECT
LOVE(LISTENING, OVERSEEING,
VISITING AND EVALUATING
Tanlangit, Reynold S.
Completed 2023
2
Addressing Classroom Absenteeism among Identified Grade 10 Students
Through Project LOVE( Listening, Overseeing,
Visiting and Evaluating )
Abstract
This study aimed to determine the extent of impact brought about by the innovation,
Project LOVE , on the manifested level of absenteeism by the identified Grade 10
students of Laureano Salusod National High School during the Second Quarter of
school year 2022-2023, and the researcher was using the DepEd SF 2 (DO 11, S.
2018- Daily Attendance of Learners)in gathering the data which reflects the actual
daily attendance of the research participants employed absenteeism survey, in a
tabular form survey instrument, to assess the level of absenteeism displayed by two
groups of identified Grade 10 students: the control group and the experimental
group.This research study utilized a quantitative research design. In this design,
participants or subjects are divided into two distinct and unrelated groups. Each
group receives a different treatment , condition , or level of the independent variable
being studied. Afterwards, measurements or observations are taken on both groups to
compare their means. The results showed a significant improvement in the manifested
level of absenteeism by the identified Grade 10 students after the implementation of
Project LOVE and the study recommends the dissemination of the results to school
administrators , parents and teachers, and for the purpose of evident implementation
of training programs for school administrators and teachers.
Students learn best when they actively love to participate in the learning
process and when they are engaged with the ability to achieve commendable
performance at school. By virtue of Deped Order Number 034, series of 2022 ,
stipulating the School Calendar and Activities for the School Year 2022-2023 should
consist 203 school days or as may be determined by further issuance/s in case of
changes in the school calendar due to unforeseen circumstances, and with this, the
students regular attendance must be closedly monitored for them to sustain best
learning experiences and commendable academic achievements at school.
With the passion of teaching children, the problems of students learning
habits will be addressed with the consistency of looking forward for the best of their
care. One of these concerns is absenteeism or the irregularity of attending classes at
school.
According to the study entitled’’ The Problem of Student Absenteeism, Its
Impact on Educational Environments, and The Evaluation of Current Policies’’ ,
student absenteeism continues to be one of the most significant impediments
preventing educational institutions from reaching their objectives.(https://files.eric.ed
.gov/fulltext/EJ1355069.pdf). This reality also calls the attention of the researcher to
conduct the study so that the school will continue to serve the learners in its utmost
capacity and provide a learning environment available for all.
School heads, principals , TIC’s , teachers and other school leaders must
consistently initiate productive rooms for improvements inorder for our identified
Grade 10 students capacitate themselves to address concerns , issues and
challenges they may encounter and by one way or another, they will gradually be
effective and efficient in classroom tasks and activities designed for them to perform in
the world of face to face classes.
5
With the power of optimism, the researcher – proponent created an
intervention entitled Project LOVE or short for Listening, Overseeing, Visiting and
Evaluating through;
LISTENING ACTIVITIES
Quarterly PTA MEETING- Deped Order 13, s. 2023, the Department of
Education has issued the omnibus guidelines on the regulation of operations of
the Parents-Teachers Association (PTA) to update and harmonize its functions
to the DepEd’s mandate. (bit.ly/deped-issues-updated-guidelines-on-parents-
teachers-associations/
OVERSEEING ACTIVITIES
SF 2- Deped Order 11, s. 2018- Daily Attendance Report of Learners- the
Department of Education has created this enhanced preparation of daily
attendance reporting of learners at school to be prepared by the class adviser.
(bit.ly/guidelines-on-the-preparation-and-checking-of-school-forms/).
Creation of Group Chats through Messenger and Facebook accounts.
VISITING ACTIVITIES
Home Visitation- DepEd Order No. 02, s. 2021 amending DepEd Order No.
030, s. 2020 paragraph 3, the marching order to conduct home visitation. This
DepEd Order guides the teachers to innovates learning approaches even this
time is always applicable in maximizing strategies for raising the academic
progress of the students sustained.(https:/
/www.scribd.com/document/497162605/Home-Visitation-Narrative-Report)
EVALUATING ACTIVITIES
DO 36, S. 2016 -Recognition Activities - – Policy Guidelines on Awards and
Recognition for the K to 12 Basic Education Program. These awards have been
designed to formally recognize the outstanding performance and achievement of
learners in academics, leadership, and social responsibility, among other
aspects of student progress and development. These awards are given to
encourage learners to strive for excellence and to become proactive members of
the school and community.( bit.ly/policy-guidelines-on awards-and-
recognition-for-the-k-to12-basic-education-program-2/)
DO 35, S. 2016 -Learning Action - The Learning Action Cell as a K to 12 Basic
Education Program School-Based Continuing Professional Development
Strategy for the Improvement of Teaching and Learning. This shall be sustained
by conducting it at least once a month on an in-person learning modality;
however, it may also be done virtually when it is difficult to have in-person
sessions, particularly when involving clustered schools. (bit.ly/deped-conduct-
learning-action-cell-lac-school-year-2022-2023/)
Here are the steps to do during pre-implementation,
- In listening activities, the teacher will secure the communication letter
addressing to the school head for the approval of the Quarterly PTA Meetings
and remind students to inform their parents to bring the communication letter
-
6
A. Research Design
The research design used in this study is a quantitative research design which
comprises two-group research design, specifically the control and experimental group.
This design is justified by the fact that the study aims to determine the extent of
impact brought about by the innovation, Project LOVE, on the manifested level of
absenteeism by the identified Grade 10 students. As such, it is necessary to conduct
observations and other scientific methods or strategies of the study towards no
intervention and with the implemented intervention, to measure the changes in their
perceived level of absenteeism.
B. Participants and other sources of data and information
The study participants were the identified Grade 10 students of Laureano
Salusod National High School which composed of forty-nine students for Control
8
Group (No Project Love Intervention) and forty-nine students for Experimental Group
(With Project Love Intervention) .The list of students identified were officially taken
from the office of the Guidance Counselor. These students shall be selected as the
subjects of the study because of their low turnout of regular attendance during the
Second Quarter of School Year 2022-2023.
The distribution of respondents is as follows:
Table 1. Distribution of Respondents
Group Number of Respondents
No Project Love Intervention 49
( Control Group)
With the Project Love Intervention 49
( Experimental Group)
C. Research Instrument
The researcher used DepEd School Form 2 (DO 11 s. 2018- Daily Attendance
Report of Learners) from the months of November to January during the Second
Quarter of School Year 2022-2023 to support the employed absenteeism survey, as a
tabular form survey instrument to assess the level of absenteeism displayed by two
groups of identified Grade 10 students: the control group and the experimental group.
Furtheremore, the researcher used the table presentation inorder to count the number
of frequency inorder to measure the manifested level of absenteeism of identified
Grade 10 students with no Project Love Intervention ( Control Group) and with the
Project Love Intervention ( Experimental Group) .
This survey instrument furthermore, can be used to measure the perceived level
of absenteeism manifested by the identified Grade 10 students because the data
are transparently reflected based on the gathered School Form 2 from the months of
November to January during the Second Quarter and the tables presented are
meticulously discussed and comprehensively justified
D. Data Gathering Procedure
In gathering the data, the researcher retrieved the SF2 for the Months of
November–January 2022-2023 during the Second Quarter from the office of Registrar
Designate and based on these gathered data, the researcher prepared another sets of
SF 2 (DO 11 s. 2018- Daily Attendance Report of Learners )for the Control Group
( NoProject Love Intervention ) and Experimental Group( With Project love Intervention)
to consolidate the attendance of identified Grade 10- students .
E. DATA ANALYSIS
The researchers used various data analysis methods, such as descriptive
statistics and tests of significance. Means from the categorized data in the table below
were utilized to answer questions 1 and 2.
9
Qualitative Description for the Absences of Students.
Level of Frequency Absenteeism Qualitative Description
11 and above High
6-10 Moderate
3-5 Low
0-2 Very Low
The researchers utilized the independent sample t-test, along with statistical
tools such as mean, standard deviation, and t-statistics.
As shown in Table 3, the mean difference between the perceived level of absenteeism
manifested by the identified grade 10 students before and after the intervention is
3.755, with a standard deviation of 0.5. The t-value is 5.221, with 96 degrees of
freedom , and a p-value of less than 0.001. This indicates a statistically significant
difference between the two means, suggesting that the intervention, Project LOVE, has
a positive impact on decreasing the perceived level of absenteeism manifested by the
identified grade 10 students.
The following table presents the results of the t-test:
Table 4. Results of Frequency level of absenteeism manifested by the identified grade
10 students before and after the intervention
Absenteeism
Frequency Level of Qualitative
Absences Description Before After Total Average
Recommendations:
Based on the results of the study, the following recommendations are
suggested:
The school administration should continue to provide opportunities for
professional development programs that are tailored to the specific needs of the
teachers, such as Project LOVE . The program has shown to be effective in addressing
the absenteeism manifested by the identified Grade 10 students and improving their
academic performance.
The school administration should consider consistent implementation and
closed monitoring and evaluation system to assess the effectiveness of professional
development programs. This will allow for continuous improvement and refinement of
12
the programs to ensure that they meet the needs of the teachers and have a positive
impact on their teaching performance.
Future studies may consider using a randomized controlled design to assess
the effectiveness of Project LOVE in comparison to other professional development
programs. This will provide more relevant evidence of the effectiveness of the program
and contribute to the broader and deeper body of knowledge on effective professional
development programs.
Overall, the study highlights also the importance of providing effective
professional development programs that are tailored to the specific needs of students
in addressing the absenteeism they behave in the school setting. The findings of this
study contribute to the broader body of knowledge on effective professional
development programs and can inform the development of future programs aimed at
improving teacher performance and student learning outcomes.
Action Plan
13
PLANS FOR DISSEMINATION AND UTILIZATION
School administrators should take note and consider of the findings. It will
be put to good use in the development of instructional methods, the creation of
curriculum, and the coordination of school governance and administration. As a
result, it should only be shared with the following people:
A. Participate research conferences, forums, and policy forums at the division or
district level to share and discuss research findings and recommendations. Our
peers in academics can assist us in getting our students' work peer-reviewed.
B. Publishing research papers and bulletins are a great way to spread the word
about technology integration and training among educators. As a result, it will
benefit children's education and development.
C. Make sure the SIP and AIP have enough money allocated to the project.
D. We can participate in discussions in LAC sessions or In-Service Training. A
different sort of in-service training may allow us to assist other schools in
improving their grading methods by sharing our expertise.
REFERENCES
(https://www.igi-global.com/dictionary/the-impact-of-a-learning-management-
system-on-student-evaluation-of-teaching/47318).
(Author /RN, James Mervilde)
(https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1355069.pdf).
10 Challenges of Teaching | How to Overcome Them. (2022, May 10). Care Check.
https://www.carecheck.co.uk/10-challenges-of-teaching/
Lochmiller, C. R., & Karnopp, J. R. (2016). The politics of coaching assistant
principals: exploring central control. International Journal of Mentoring and
Coaching in Education, 5(3), 203–220. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijmce-02-2016-
0015
Republic Act No. 9155 | GOVPH. (2001, August 11). Official Gazette of the Republic of
the Philippines.
https://mirror.officialgazette.gov.ph/2001/08/11/republic-act-no-9155/
Villas, A. M. (2021). Learning Action Cell. Scribd.
https://www.scribd.com/document/317086301/Learning-Action-Cell#:
%7E:text=School%20Learning%20Action%20Cell%2C%20commonly%20known
%20as%20LAC,school%20head%20or%20from%20peer%20to%20peer
%20mentoring.
administration/#:~:text=Key%20Terms%20and%20Concepts%3A%20Survey,depends
%20on%20the%20survey%20research
https://www.waterford.org/education/active-listening-in-the-classroom/
14
https://www.thoughtco.com/a-comprehensive-breakdown-of-the-roles-of-school-
personnel-3194684
https://nhvrc.org/about-home-visiting/why-home-visiting/
Financial Report
Shown below are the expenses throughout this action research.
Category A
Expenses for Supplies and Materials
Unit Quantity Description Unit Cost Amount
ream 2 Short Bond paper 170 340
ream 2 A4 Bond paper 225 450
bottle 1 Ink L3110 black 280 280
TOTAL 1070
Category B
Travel expenses for the Submission of Completed Action Research to the Division
Destination Transportation Amount
School to Pagadian Terminal Van 150
Purpose of Pagadian Terminal to Division
Tricycle 50
Travel Office
Division Office to Pagadian
Tricycle 50
Terminal
Pagadian Terminal to School Van 150
TOTAL 400
Research Agenda Category: Check only one main research Check up to one cross-cutting
theme: theme, if applicable:
[ ] Teaching and Learning [ ] DRRM
[ ] Child Protection [ ] Gender and Development
[ ] Human Resource [ ] Inclusive Education
Development
[ /] Governance
Funding Year: 2022-2023
Region/Schools Division IX/ZAMBOANGA DEL SUR
Office:
School and/or Functional
Division Conducted: LAUREANO SALUSOD NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
Name/Position/Contact
Details REYNOLD S. TANLANGIT, EdD./ 09690324176 &
[Author 1/Lead Proponent] 09073941575
Name/Position/Contact
Details
[Author 2]
Name/Position/Contact
Details
[Author 3]
Date of Evaluation:
Instructions: Put a checkmark in the appropriate column beside each criterion item. If your
answer is YES, specify the pages and paragraph number/s where the criterion
items are presented and satisfied.
Criterion Items Yes No Specific pages
and paragraph
number/s where
the criterion
items are
presented and
satisfied, if
applicable
Title
1. Represents what the study is all about / 2
2. Presents the innovation, intervention, or strategy to / 2
solve the problem or issue as its focus of inquiry
3. Contains clear and concise words / 2
4. Comprises not more than 12 substantive words / 2
(except for acronyms and excluding the, of, in, and,
to, for, into, etc.)
Complied Not
Note: At least 3 criterion items must be marked YES to Complied
indicate compliance with this part.
Abstract
1. Describes the general statement of the problem or / 2
objectives/purposes of the research
2. Presents the research methods (e.g., research / 2
design, participants and/or other sources of data
and information, sampling technique, research
environment and timeline, research instruments,
data gathering methods, and data analysis)
3. Highlights the summary of the research findings, / 2
conclusions, implications, and recommendations
4. Contains 200 – 250 words / 2
Complied Not
Note: All criterion items must be marked YES to indicate Complied
compliance with this part.
Keywords
1. Captures the most relevant aspects of the study / 2
2. Contains three to five keywords, phrases, or / 2
acronyms separated by semicolons and arranged
alphabetically
Complied Not
Note: All criterion items must be marked YES to indicate Complied
compliance with this part.
Acknowledgment
1. Acknowledges the people who helped or / 3
contributed to the completion of the research
2. Acknowledges the research funding, sponsoring / 3
institution, support staff, and research
participants who have helped complete the
research
Complied Not
Note: At least 1 criterion item must be marked YES to Complied
indicate compliance with this part.
Context and Rationale
1. Provides a comprehensive discussion of the nature / 4
and relevance of the identified problem or issue
(e.g., cite some legal basis and relevant literature)
2. Addresses existing issues and challenges / 4
3. Emphasizes the need to conduct research by / 4
showing an in-depth and critical analysis of the
situation (e.g., presenting data reports)
4. Discusses the significance and relevance of the / 4
research problem to the needs and welfare of
students and other education stakeholders
5. Presents a well-organized review of literature that / 4
supports the identified problem
6. Shows a rigorous literature review by citing the key / 4
players in the research conversation
7. States clearly the main research aims/objectives / 4
8. Highlights the policy implications relevant for / 4
planning and development
9. Discusses the scope and limitation of the study / 4
thoroughly
Complied Not
Note: At least 8 criterion items must be marked YES to Complied
indicate compliance with this part.
Action Plan
1. Presents a clear and feasible comprehensive action / 12
plan
Complied Not
Note: This criterion item must be marked YES to Complied
indicate compliance with this part.
References
1. Acknowledges the sources correctly and completely / 13-14
and presents the in-text citations appropriately
following the 17th edition of the Chicago Manual of
Style (CMOS) as modified by DepEd
Note: This criterion item must be marked YES to Complied Not
Complied
indicate compliance with this part.
Financial Report
1. Documents and communicates the details and / 14
breakdown of research costs
2. Reflects items and costs that adhere to the funding / 14
needs of the research and BERF guidelines
Complied Not
Note: All criterion items must be marked YES to Complied
indicate compliance with this part.
Source: Ruth L. Fuentes, Pedro Melchor M. Natividad, Ruel A. Saldua and Lee G. Baraquia,
“Self-Evaluation Tool for Completed Action Research (SET-CAR): An Innovation Ensuring
Quality Control,” (2022).
RESEARCH INSTRUMENTS
ANNEX 2
ANNEX 1.
RESEARCH TITLE:
/ SCHOOL / GOVERNANCE
Year the Research was conducted: Second Quarter of School Year 2022-2023
CONTACT
CONTACT NUMBER 1: NUMBER 2: EMAIL ADDRESS/ FB ACCOUNT:
0907394157 reynold.tanlangit@deped.gov.ph/
09690324176
5 Reynold Tanlangit
EDUCATIONAL
ATTAINMENT
BSED
MAED
DOCTOR OF
EDUCATION MAJOR IN
EDUCATIONAL
MANAGEMENT Ed.D.)
SIGNATURE OF
RESEARCHER
Reynold S. Tanlangit,EdD.
Teacher III, Laureano Salusod NHS
This Schools Division
Sir/Maam:
Greetings!
This refers to the Completed Action Research you submitted to the Office of Planning
and Research, Division of Zamboanga del Sur for possible funding under the Basic
Education Research Fund BERF or Local SEF.
The Research Committee has carefully evaluated the final Completed Action Research
entitled “Addressing Classroom Absenteeism Among Identified Grade 10 Students
Through Project Love”, based on the criteria prescribed in the Research Management
Guidelines and we are pleased to inform you the said Completed Action Research was
approved and implemented.
In this regard, we may start implementing your approved research study. Further, all
research studies conducted at school and district levels cover a period of six months.
Hence, it is expected that your study ends in 2023. A Face to Face regarding the
implementation of your Completed research is scheduled soon. Moreover, this
orientation is a venue to finalize the schedule of signing the Memorandum of
Agreement (MOA) at a later date, which contains your engagement.
For clarifications and any concerns, kindly contact Daria Gay M. Marikit, SEPS, the
Office of Planning and Research at the telephone number (062) 214-3386.
We look forward to the successful implementation of your research. Thank you very
much.
Very truly yours,
JERRY M.BOKINGKITO, EdD
Assistant Schools Division Superintendent
Chair, Schools Division Research Committee
MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT
This Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) is entered into in the School Division Office,
Dao, Pagadian City, Philippines by and between:
REYNOLD S. TANLANGIT, EdD., TEACHER III of LAUREANO SALUSOD
NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL , DIMATALING DISTRICT from
DIMATALING, ZAMBOANGA DEL SUR, hereinafter referred to as
GRANTEE
and
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, DIVISION OF ZAMBOANGA DEL SUR
with office address at Dao Complex, Dao, Pagadian City, represented
by the chairman of the Research Committee, JERRY M. BOKINGKITO,
ASSISTANT SCHOOLS DIVISION SUPERINTENDENT, hereinafter
referred to as DEPED, Division of Zamboanga del Sur
WITNESSETH
WHEREAS, DEPED aims to promote an environment conducive to ideal of evidence-
based decision- making through the conduct of various research initiatives across all
governance level;
WHEREAS, DEPED has instituted the Basic Education Research Fund (BERF) as a
funding facility for potential research studies to be conducted by eligible DepEd
personnel;
WHEREAS, DEPED has evaluated and approved all submitted research proposals to
ensure the quality and relevance of potential research studies and has informed the
research proponents of the results of the evaluation;
WHEREAS, the research proponent, now known as the "GRANTEE", has been oriented
on the systems and processes of the BERF facility.
NOW, THEREFORE, DEPED AND the GRANTEE (collectively known as the Parties)
agree as follows:
ARTICLE 1
SCOPE AND DURATION OF THE AGREEMENT
Section 1.1 All the activities in the approved research proposal to be conducted will be
school in scope. The work plan of the approved research proposal is attached as
Annex 1 of this agreement.
Section 1.2 The implementation of the research study will last based on the approved
timeline as approved.
Section 1.3 Any deviation from the original and approved research proposal will be
immediately communicated to the Schools Division Research Committee (SDRC) by
the GRANTEE. All major changes warrant the approval of the Research Committee.
The approved research topic cannot be changed by the GRANTEE at any point during
the study.
Section 1.4 In the event that the GRANTEE sees the need for extension, a letter of
request for the extension with justification will be submitted to the Schools Division
Research Committee. Valid reasons for extension which will be decided by the SDRC
include illness of the grantee, calamities, disasters, and other extenuating
circumstances. The request of extension will be approved provided there will be no
additional cost to DEPED. The GRANTEE will be allowed 1 month extension.
Section 1.5 In cases where unforeseen circumstances force the cessation of the
implementation of the research, the GRANTEE shall write a letter to the Research
Committee with justification and documentary support.
ARTICLE II
OBLIGATIONS OF THE PARTIES
Section 2.1 The total cost of the approved research proposal is ₽5,000.00. DEPED will
release payment to the GRANTEE in two tranches provided that the GRANTEE will
submit all the expected outputs. The table of deliverables per tranches is outline in
Annex __ of this MOA.
Section 2.2 The Grantee will be responsible for the following:
a) conduct the research as approved in his/her research proposal;
b) submit all the required outputs to DEPED as per approved timeline;
c) ensure that the conduct of research will follow the highest standards of
ethics to protect our learners and the community;
d) disclose any conflict of interest( possible or actual) that may arise during the
conduct of the research;
e) ensure that all funds provided will be spent as per approved cost estimates;
f) disseminate completed research on appropriate venues.
Section 2.3 DEPED will be responsible for the following:
a) ensure the timely release of the research funds for the GRANTEE;
b) evaluate thoroughly the submitted deliverables of the GRANTEE;
c) provide technical assistance to the GRANTEE as per monitoring and
evaluation results and as requested by the GRANTEE;
d) monitor the progress of the research proposal;
e) conduct due diligence in evaluating and approving deliverables; and
f) assist in approving venues for dissemination of the completed research
ARTICLE III
SPECIAL PROVISIONS
Section 3.1 Authorship and Ownership. The GRANTEE will be the sole author of the
research. The research funded by the BERF will be co- owned by the authors and
DEPED. Written permission from the SDRC is required when the research will be
presented in research conferences, forums, and other related events, or be published
in research journals and bulletins. Also, in these presentations or publications, the
GRANTEE must duly acknowledge the funding source/s for the study.
Section 3.2 Plagiarism, Fraud, and Conflict of Interest. The GRANTEE will ensure that
the research proposal and final report submitted are original works. Appropriate
referencing and citation must be included in the submitted deliverables. Further, the
GRANTEE will ensure that there will be no conflict of interest during the conduct of
research. The GRANTEE has submitted declarations of anti-plagiarism and absence of
conflict of interest.
Any act of fraud and plagiarism will be dealt with accordingly. Further, if the
GRANTEE committed plagiarism or any form of fraud, s/he will be blacklisted from
availing any other research grant mechanism in the Department.
Section 3.3 Failure to Complete Research Proposal. In the event that the GRANTEE
failed to complete and submit the deliverables, the research proponent will be required
to return the total amount of research fund s/he has received during the course of the
implementation.
Section 3.4 Effectivity and Termination of MOA. The MOA will take effect on the date
of signature of both the GRANTEE and DEPED and will end upon the submission of
all deliverables and release of the funds. This MOA shall also be terminated under
sections 1.5, 3.2, 3.3 or any circumstances that will lead to the non- completion of the
research.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have affixed their signatures on
________________________ at DepEd, Zamboanga del Sur Division Office, Dao Complex,
Dao, Pagadian City.
GRANTEE DEPED
WITNESSED BY: