Professional Documents
Culture Documents
QI Workbench Distill Report 3.0
QI Workbench Distill Report 3.0
0 Test
JULY 2023
Contents
Introduction
Platform comparison
Results comparison
Suggestions
DUGRef: wendolQI_382 2
Introduction
○ The aim of this study is to test the third version of QI workbench in Insight in comparison with Distill software.
○ The previous QI workbench versions was tested and compared in the previous report.
○ Several things have been added in this new QI workbench version and included in this study.
○ Fixed the AI vs VpVs plot ellipses (vpVsRhoCorrelationMatrix was being ignored in previous versions)
○ Added 0 lines for more plots
○ Added option to enter axis limits for 1D plots
○ Made formula tables more readable
○ Added 'open in crossplot' button to make it easier to display your 2D plots
DUGRef: wendolQI_382 3
Introduction (cont)
○ Recent stochastic modelling trend: wendoIQI_382 were used as as a reference for this study.
○ Workflow: Sealing Lithology Claystone
Lithology Sandstone
○ Replicate lithology and fluid mixing scenarios from wendoIQI_382 stochastic modelling in Distill to make sure Volume 80% ± 5%
Reservoir
Brine 100%
the scenarios are the same with the model done in the report. Fluids Oil 80% ± 5%
○ Replicate the same lithology and fluid mixing scenarios using QI workbench. Mixing Lithology
Gas 80% ± 5%
Claystone
○ Compare the results on the absolute rock Properties, AVA and stack rotation plots. Depths (mTVDBML) 2500
Sealing Lithology Claystone
○ Statistical rock physics trends in this study Lithology
Volume
Low Vp Sandstone
80% ± 5%
Reservoir
○ Reservoir: Brine 100%
Fluids Oil 80% ± 5%
○ Sandstone, Gas 80% ± 5%
Mixing Lithology Claystone
○ Argillaceous Sandstone, Depths (mTVDBML) 2500
Reservoir
○
Brine 100%
○ High Vp Sandstone Fluids Oil 80% ± 5%
Gas 80% ± 5%
○ Non-reservoir: Mixing Lithology Claystone
Depths (mTVDBML) 2500
○ Claystone, Note:
○ Silty Claystone and ● The majority of reservoir lithologies picked
over the Merian Formation at Phoenix-1 are
○ Low Vp Claystone Sandstone.
DUGRef: wendolQI_382 4
Contents
Introduction
Platform comparison
Results comparison
Suggestions
DUGRef: wendolQI_382 5
QI Workbench vs Distill
QI Workbench Distill
Output
DUGRef: wendolQI_382 6
QI Workbench vs Distill - Trends
QI Workbench Distill
DUGRef: wendolQI_382 7
QI Workbench vs Distill - Trends
QI Workbench Distill
DUGRef: wendolQI_382 8
QI Workbench vs Distill - Fluids
QI Workbench Distill
DUGRef: wendolQI_382 9
QI Workbench vs Distill - Lithologies
QI Workbench Distill
Lithologies misspell
DUGRef: wendolQI_382 10
QI Workbench vs Distill - LithoFluids
QI Workbench Distill
DUGRef: wendolQI_382 11
QI Workbench vs Distill - Interfaces
QI Workbench Distill
DUGRef: wendolQI_382 12
Contents
Introduction
Platform comparison
Results comparison
Suggestions
DUGRef: wendolQI_382 13
Lithology and fluid mixing scenarios: Merian Formation
Phoenix-1: Composite log illustrating end-member picks over the Merian Formation
Argillaceous Sandstone
Reservoir
Brine 100%
Fluids Oil 80% ± 5%
Gas 80% ± 5%
Mixing Lithology Claystone
Depths (mTVDBML) 2500
Argillaceous Sandstone Sealing Lithology Claystone
Claystone Lithology Low Vp Sandstone
Merian
Volume 80% ± 5%
Reservoir
Low Vp Sandstone Brine 100%
Fluids Oil 80% ± 5%
Gas 80% ± 5%
Sandstone Vp versus Depth Mixing Lithology Claystone
Depths (mTVDBML) 2500
Reservoir
Brine 100%
Sandstone Fluids Oil 80% ± 5%
Gas 80% ± 5%
Mixing Lithology Claystone
Depths (mTVDBML) 2500
Sandstone Note:
● The majority of reservoir lithologies picked
over the Merian Formation at Phoenix-1 are
Sandstone.
DUGRef: wendolQI_382 14
13
AI versus Vp/Vs: Sandstone, Low Vp Sandstone and Argillaceous Sandstone (From the report)
Vres = 80%, Mixing lithology = Claystone
AI versus Vp/Vs @ 2500 mTVDBML AI versus Vp/Vs @ 2500 mTVDBML AI versus Vp/Vs @ 2500 mTVDBML
Sandstone Brine (Sw = 100%) Low Vp Sandstone Argillaceous Sandstone
Oil (So = 80%)
Gas (Sg = 80%)
Claystone
Silty
Claystone
At a depth of 2500 mTVDBML, for the proposed reservoir lithologies (Sandstone, Argillaceous Sandstone and Low Vp Sandstone) mixed with Claystone, on
average:
○ Sandstone and Argillaceous Sandstone are possibly discriminated from the non-reservoir lithologies while Low Vp Sandstone is very well discriminated from background
non-reservoir lithologies.
○ Hydrocarbon fluid cases are well discriminated from brine case in Low Vp Sandstone and Argillaceous Sandstone. Also the discrimination between gas and brine case is
good for Sandstone.
Note: All the displayed models are derived from shallow rock physics trends.
DUGRef: wendolQI_382 15
AI versus Vp/Vs: Sandstone, Low Vp Sandstone and Argillaceous Sandstone (Recreate in Distill)
Vres = 80%, Mixing lithology = Claystone
Claystone
Silty
Claystone
○ The lithology and fluid mixing scenarios were replicated from wendoIQI_382 stochastic modelling report in Distill to make sure the figures are
comparable.
DUGRef: wendolQI_382 16
AI versus Vp/Vs: Sandstone, Low Vp Sandstone and Argillaceous Sandstone (QI Workbench 3.0)
Vres = 80%, Mixing lithology = Claystone
Claystone
Silty
Claystone
DUGRef: wendolQI_382 17
µρ versus λρ: Sandstone, Low Vp Sandstone and Argillaceous Sandstone (Recreate in Distill)
Vres = 80%, Mixing lithology = Claystone
Claystone
Silty
Claystone
DUGRef: wendolQI_382 19
µρ versus λρ: Sandstone, Low Vp Sandstone and Argillaceous Sandstone (QI Workbench 3.0)
Vres = 80%, Mixing lithology = Claystone
Claystone
Silty
Claystone
DUGRef: wendolQI_382 20
New QI workbench update added
QI Workbench - Modelling for PDF an option to view in crossplot
QI Workbench Distill
DUGRef: wendolQI_382 22
QI Workbench - Modelling (AI vs Vp/Vs)
QI Workbench Distill
QI workbench works on the
fly with Crossplot in Insight
Claystone
Silty
Claystone
DUGRef: wendolQI_382 23
QI Workbench - Modelling for AVA New QI workbench update
QI Workbench Distill
DUGRef: wendolQI_382 24
QI workbench generally show
QI Workbench - Modelling for AVA similar result with Distill
QI Workbench Distill
QI workbench works on the
fly with Crossplot in Insight
Sandstone
We can select to view Rock
properties or Interface properties
Claystone
Claystone
Claystone
Brine Sand
Claystone
Oil Sand
Claystone
Gas Sand
DUGRef: wendolQI_382 25
To adjust to other properties. QI Workbench do QI workbench generally show
QI Workbench - Probabilities not have reflectivity probabilities. Other
properties works fine and comparable with
similar result with Distill
Distill
QI Workbench Distill
Reflectivities section
require vertical and
horizontal 0 axes
Angle lines
updated in this
new workbench
update
Introduction
Platform comparison
Results comparison
Issues and Suggestions
DUGRef: wendolQI_382 29
Issues
○ Modelling for AVA (Interface Model):
○ Include no-AVA line and 0 axes as reference (high priority). This is really important to identify the AVA classes.
○ Reflectivities:
○ Include vertical and horizontal 0 axes as reference (high priority). We don’t need angle lines for reflectivities section.
○ Probabilities
○ View in crossplot is not working. We can exclude the option since we do not need it.
○ Lithologies
○ Minor misspell
DUGRef: wendolQI_382 30
Suggestions
○ Probabilities, Reflectivities, Separability:
○ Include cross hair features to pinpoint the values
○ Modelling for PDF:
○ Include option to control the amount of scatter points.
○ Probabilities:
○ Include y-axis title
○ Include other properties (reflectivity, AVO)
DUGRef: wendolQI_382 31