Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Cat PTW Supplementary
Cat PTW Supplementary
Referenced documents
Elekta does not supply all the documents that we refer to in this document with the equipment.
Elekta reserves the right to make the decision on which of the documents we supply with the
equipment.
Table of Contents
Chapter Title Page
1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
3 Tests . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
— Blank page —
1 Introduction
Section Title Page
— Blank page —
Note: If Elekta has to do other tests that are not agreed as part of the Contract of Sale, there are added
costs.
Before you start the tests, make sure that the scale convention of the XVI system is the same as
the host linear accelerator. Refer to XVI Installation Information for more information.
To do the tests in a minimum of time, Elekta recommends that you do them in the sequence of
this document. But, it is possible to do the tests in different sequences.
After each test, record the result in this document in the space after the test procedure.
Use this document together with the applicable Instructions for Use.
— Blank page —
— Blank page —
because 9 MeV does not have a Cal Block, therefore you must use 8 MeV or 10 MeV as these are
the energy settings near 9 MeV.
3 22 MeV is not available with Agility™.
4 The number of electron filters is reduced to two if you have a linear accelerator with HDR X-
rays. This will give possible energy ranges of 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 15 MeV, or 4, 10, 12, 15, 18, 20 MeV,
or 6, 8, 18, 20 MeV.
Note: A Film processor and densitometer are not used when you do the tests with AutoCAL or Ashland
GAFCHROMIC X-ray film.
Note: There are alternative tests for electron flatness for Elekta linear accelerators installed to USA
procedure.
Diaphragm - X1 + X2 Diaphragm
X1 - X2 + X1 X2
- Y1
- Y2
Leaf X1:1 Leaf X2:1
Diaphragm Y1
005123 ©2013 Elekta Limited
3 Tests
Section Title Page
With full rotation of the beam limiting device, the position of the crosswires must be contained in
a circle with a diameter of:
• 1 mm at 100 cm SSD
• 2 mm at the level of the floor.
1 Use a spirit level and adjust the gantry angle accurately to 0°.
2 Set up the treatment table with the surface of the table top at 100 cm SSD.
3 Attach a sheet of graph paper to the surface of the table top.
4 Rotate the BLD 360° and make a plot on the sheet of graph paper of the position of the
crosswire image.
5 Rotate the treatment table to get a projection of the crosswire image on the floor.
6 Attach a sheet of graph paper to the floor.
7 Rotate the BLD 360° and make a plot on the sheet of graph paper of the position of the
crosswire image.
8 Record the results of the two plots in Table 3.1.
Accepted by:
At all angles of the gantry, the intersection of the crosswires at 100 cm SSD must stay on the inner
side of a circle with a diameter of 2 mm or less.
– 270°
– 0°.
5 Record the results in the Table 3.2.
To calculate the vector use the formula that follows:
Vector = (AB) 2 + (GT) 2
Deviation at
Limit Deviation A-B Deviation G-T Vector
gantry angle
90° Vector ≤ 2
mm
180°
270°
0°
Accepted by:
The X-ray field edges must align with the displayed diaphragm or leaf position to:
• ±1 mm for field sizes of maximum 20 cm × 20 cm.
• ±1% for larger fields.
The light field edges must align with the X-ray field edges to:
• ±1.0 mm for field sizes from 5 cm × 5 cm to 20 cm × 20 cm.
• ±1% for larger fields.
For film, measurement of the X-ray field edges is from the 50% density point, to the image of the
crosswires at isocenter.
If you use AutoCAL™, AutoCAL™ will control these settings.
3.2.2 Doing a test of the X-ray field size and field size display
1 Set up the prescriptions with applicable field sizes, see Table 3.3.
Note: If you have the AutoCAL™ tool, you can use this to do the tests for MLCi2™ without films. Do not
use AutoCAL™ with Agility™. Make sure that you attach a copy of the test results from AutoCAL™
to each copy of this document.
Table 3.3 Field sizes and field size displays for this test
Buildup
Field size Angle of
Beam limiting device Film No. Energy (MV) material
(cm) (X × Y) BLD
(cm)
MLCi2™ and Agility™ 1 10 × 10 0° 4 and 6 2 cm
2 10 × 10 0° 8, 10 and 15 3 cm
3 10 × 10 0° 18 and 25 4 cm
Table 3.4 Results from X-ray field size and field size display tests
X-ray to
Total X-ray
Displayed Measured X- Measured light field
Energy Total field Total light to light
field size Diaphragm ray field edge light field edge
(MV) size (cm) field (cm) difference
(cm) (cm) edge (cm) difference
(cm)
(cm)
X1
X2
Y1
Y2
X1
X2
Y1
Y2
X1
X2
Y1
Y2
Accepted by:
The percentage depth dose ratio on the radiation beam axis of D10 to Dmax is the nominal energy,
(±1%), to which the group of machines are matched.
Depth dose SSD = 100 cm
Field size:
10 cm × 10 cm for MLCi2™ and Agility™
SSD = 95 cm for 4 MV
SSD = 90 cm for 6 MV and higher energy
Gantry and BLD angles = 0°
Flatness Field size
Depth of probe = 5 cm for 4 MV
10 cm × 10 cm and 30 cm × 30 cm for MLCi2™ and Agility™
Depth of probe = 10 cm for 6 MV and higher energies
Inplane: G-T
Measurement
Crossplane: A-B
direction
Diagonal: TA-GB and GA-TB
Note: Elekta can only match digital accelerators with flattening filter free (FFF) beams at D10 nominal
energy.
For X-rays, the penetrative quality is the percentage dose at a depth of 10 cm (D10), measured in
relation to the maximum absorbed dose on the radiation beam axis.
Note: The maximum permitted difference between the actual value and the declared value of
penetrative quality is ±1%.
Penetrative quality
Radiation Energy Difference (%)
Declared 1 Measured
X-ray X-low 67.5% 67.57 -0.10 %
X-mid %
X-high 73.0% 72.91% 0.10 %
6 MV HDR 67.5% 67.47% 0.04 %
10 MV HDR %
1 See Table 3.7 for the list of declared values.
The linear accelerator can be set up to have the same specification and mode of operation as one
or more other Elekta linear accelerators. These can be new or previously installed machines.
To set up a new machine to operate with a previously installed machine or machines, Elekta uses
the archived factory data from the installed machine or machines.
To set up a new machine, or group of new machines, Elekta uses the current factory data.
Note: Elekta can only match linear accelerators from serial no. 105520.
Note: The type of machine and the type of BLD must be correct for a match. For example, a flattened
profile match is not possible with a MLCi2, but a D10 match is possible.
Note: The maximum permitted difference of penetrative quality of the machine, or group of machines, is
±1% between the measured value and the factory data value.
Note: Elekta can only match linear accelerators with FFF beams at D10 nominal energy.
3.3.5 Doing a test of the penetrative quality of the X-rays for Factory Data
Match
1 Record the serial numbers of the linear accelerators to be matched in Table 3.8.
Accepted by:
The Customer Data Match is the same as the Factory Data Match, but uses new data from
previous installed machines.
To set up a new machine to operate with a previous installed machine or machines, Elekta uses
the factory standards to get the data from the machine to be matched, and then make sure that
the data is in the correct format. The new machine is then set up to match the installed machine
or machines.
The new data from the customer must:
• Give continued compliance to IEC standards.
• Be approved by Elekta.
• Agreed as part of the Contract of Sale.
Note: Elekta can only match linear accelerators from serial no. 105520.
Note: The type of machine and the type of BLD must be correct for a match. For example, a flattened
profile match is not possible between MLCi2™ and Agility™, but a D10 match is possible.
Note: The maximum permitted difference of penetrative quality of the machine, or group of machines, is
±1% between the measured value and the factory data value.
Note: Elekta can only match linear accelerators with FFF beams at D10 nominal energy.
3.3.7 Doing a test of the penetrative quality of the X-rays for Customer
Data Match
1 Record the serial numbers of the linear accelerators to be matched in Table 3.10.
2 Set up a water phantom with the surface at 100 cm SSD.
3 Set the field size.
– For MLCi2™ and Agility™, the field size is 10 cm × 10 cm.
4 Use a traveling ionization chamber and measure the percentage dose on the radiation beam
axis.
5 Record the results in Table 3.11.
6 Do steps 2 to 5 again for each of the linear accelerators.
X-ray X-low %
X-mid %
X-high %
6 MV HDR %
10 MV HDR %
Accepted by:
The distal 80% isodose on the radiation beam axis is less than or equal to 1 mm of the average of
the group of machines that are matched. There is no match of electron flatness.
Depth dose SSD = 95 cm
Gantry and BLD angles = 0°
Electron applicator field size = 10 cm × 10 cm
The specified penetrative quality is the depth where 80% of the maximum absorbed dose on the
radiation beam axis (R80) is obtained.
The energy is specified as E (MeV) = 0.3 × R80 (mm), where R80 is the depth of the 80% relative
dose.
The maximum difference between the actual value and the declared value of penetrative quality,
(see Table 3.13), must not be more than ±1 mm for:
MLCi2™ and Agility™:
• SSD = 95 cm
• Electron applicator with field size = 10 cm × 10 cm.
Note: The ionization data must be changed to absorbed dose in relation to depth.
The specified penetrative quality is the depth where you have 80% of the maximum absorbed
dose on the radiation beam axis (R80).
The energy is specified as MeV = 0.3 × R80 (mm), where R80 is the depth of the 80% relative dose.
The maximum difference between the actual value and the declared value of penetrative quality,
see Table 3.14, must not be more than ±1 mm for:
MLCi2™ and Agility™:
• SSD = 100 cm
• Electron applicator with field size = 14 cm × 14 cm.
The TG21/TG25 standards for beam definition cannot be used with the energies in Table 3.14,
because the parts that follow are made for compliance with IEC standards:
• Electron filters
• Primary foils
• Related electron applicators.
Therefore, it is only possible to do the analysis of beam profiles to IEC standards.
Note: In relation to the formulae to calculate the energy, R50 × 2.33 gives a lower value than R80 × 3.0. If
you increase the energy to adjust the difference, this can have an effect on the flatness of the
profile. This is because the filters are designed for compliance with the IEC standard.
Note: The ionization data must be changed to absorbed dose in relation to depth.
Accepted by:
Related Links:
Results table for the penetrative quality of electron radiation on page 29
Specifications for the depth dose measurements for MLCi2™ and Agility™ on page 28
Penetrative quality
(R80) Difference (maximum
Nominal energy
±1 mm)
Declared Measured
4 MeV 13.3 mm NA NA mm
6 MeV 20 mm 19.8 0.20 mm
8 MeV 26.7 mm 26.67 0.03 mm
9 MeV 30 mm NA NA mm
10 MeV 33.3 mm 33.18 0.12 mm
12 MeV 40 mm 39.89 0.11 mm
15 MeV 50 mm 49.87 0.13 mm
18 MeV 60 mm NA NA mm
20 MeV 66.7 mm NA NA mm
22 MeV1 73.3 mm NA NA mm
122 MeV is not available with Agility™.
The flatness of the X-ray fields is the ratio of the maximum absorbed dose in the flattened area, to
the minimum absorbed dose in the flattened area at the standard depth of measurement.
The standard depth of measurement is:
• 5 cm for the 4 MV energy
• 10 cm for all other energies.
Each measured point can be an average of not more than 1 cm2. The ratio must not be more
than:
• MLCi2™ and Agility™:
– 106% for field sizes between 10 cm × 10 cm and 30 cm × 30 cm
– 110% for field sizes greater than 30 cm × 30 cm.
Where:
This is the maximum ratio of the absorbed dose at two points in a flattened area, equidistant
from the center axes measured at the standard depth of measurement.
The depth of measurement is calculated as an average over an area not greater than 1 cm2. The
ratio must not be more than 103%.
Where:
Dleft and Dright are points equidistant from the center axis on the left and right side.
3.6.3 Definition of the flattened area in the uniformity test of X-ray fields
The definition of the flattened area is the area inside a straight line that connect at points on the
major axes and diagonal axes of square fields. (See Table 3.17 and Figure 3.1).
(Dm) 1
3
(Dd)
2
5 1
NOT TO SCALE 000503 ©2012 Elekta Limited
3.6.4 Test conditions for the uniformity test of X-ray radiation fields
The maximum size of a square field is 35 cm × 35 cm. Larger fields have round corners. This is
caused by the aperture of the primary collimator, which makes the primary beam the shape of a
circle with a maximum diameter of 50 cm at 100 cm SSD.
Table 3.19 Results for X-ray flatness and symmetry tests for MLCi2™ and Agility™
This is the maximum ratio of the absorbed dose measured at points equidistant from the
radiation beam axis up to 80% of the field size.
The ratio must not be more than 103%.
Where:
Dleft and Dright are points equidistant from the center axis on the left and right side.
3.7.2 Specification for the beam profile for the FFF beams
The beam profile is a set of relative dose measurements made at the beam points of
measurement. The relative dose is the ratio of the dose at a given point (Dx) to the dose at the
radiation beam axis (Dcax). The relative dose is shown as a percentage. The relative dose is
measured at points in the radiation field with the photon diode in the isocenter plane at a depth
of 10 cm of water.
100 × Dx
Relative_dose =
Dcax
Table 3.20 Nominal relative dose and tolerances at each field measurement point for the major axes
(6 MV HDR)
Measurement point (distance from CAX as Nominal relative dose Nominal relative dose
a % of the half field width) (%) for a 10 cm × 10 cm (%) for a 30 cm × 30 cm
field size field size
20% 99.0 94.8
50% 94.8 79.4
80% 87.2 64.2
Absolute tolerance (±%) 3 3
Table 3.21 Nominal relative dose and tolerances at each field measurement point for the major axes
(10 MV HDR)
Measurement point (distance from CAX as Nominal relative dose Nominal relative dose
a % of the half field width) (%) for a 10 cm × 10 cm (%) for a 30 cm × 30 cm
field size field size
20% 98.4 90.5
50% 91.7 69.2
80% 81.3 53.1
Absolute tolerance (±%) 3 3
For field sizes of 5 cm × 5 cm and larger, examine points along the major axes at 20%, 50% and
80% from the center of the beam axis to the set field edge.
The gray points in Figure 3.2 show the beam points of measurement on the major, and the black
points show the beam points of measurement on the diagonal axis.
H
al
fD
ia
go
na
F
lF
D E
ie
ld
w
id
th
(H
D
FW
)
A = 20% HFW
B = 50% HFW
C = 80% HFW
D = 20% HDFW
A
G E = 50% HDFW
B F = 60% HDFW
C
G = Vertex
Half Field width (HFW)
004555 ©2012 Elekta Limited
Figure 3.2 Points of measurement for beam profile shape and symmetry
Field edge
Penumbra
Measurement point Nominal relative dose (%) for each test field size
distance from CAX as a %
10 cm × 10 cm 30 cm × 30 cm
of the half field width
L R Avg L R Avg
20% G-T axis 99.2 99.2 99.2 94.71 95 94.86
A-B axis 99.32 99.05 99.19 95.25 95.04 95.15
50% G-T axis 94.92 95.46 95.19 79.35 80.01 79.68
A-B axis 95.16 95.01 95.09 79.43 79.6 79.52
80% G-T axis 87.29 87.71 87.50 64.27 64.76 64.52
A-B axis 87.01 86.99 87.00 64.32 64.54 64.43
Symmetry G-T axis 100.80 101.63
Symmetry A-B axis 100.62 101.05
Measurement point Nominal relative dose (%) for each test field size
distance from CAX as a %
10 cm × 10 cm 30 cm × 30 cm
of the half field width
L R Avg L R Avg
20% G-T axis NA NA NA NA NA NA
A-B axis NA NA NA NA NA NA
50% G-T axis NA NA NA NA NA NA
A-B axis NA NA NA NA NA NA
80% G-T axis NA NA NA NA NA NA
A-B axis NA NA NA NA NA NA
Symmetry G-T axis NA NA
Symmetry A-B axis NA NA
Accepted by: NA
Accepted by:
The maximum distance between the 90% isodose profiles and the edges of the geometrical field
(defined by the 50% isodose) at 95 cm SSD at the standard depth of measurement. This distance
must not be more than 10 mm along the major axes.
The ratio of the maximum absorbed dose at two points in a radiation field related to the
absorbed dose on the axis of the beam, must not be more than 103%.
Where:
This is the ratio of the absorbed dose, at two points in a symmetrical position, in relation to the
beam axis more than 1 cm on the inner side of the 90% isodose profile.
At the standard depth of measurement and the calculated average for an area not greater than
1 cm2, the ratio must not be more than 103%.
Where:
3.9.4 Doing the uniformity test of electron radiation fields (IEC standard)
Note: If you adjust the Autotracking values from the default settings during installation, you must
measure the electron applicator average radiation leakage. See Appendix B - Measuring the
electron applicator average radiation leakage.
a 90%
Distance a = (d1-1 cm) + (d2-1 cm)
Distance b = geometric field size
50%
d1 d2
b
000412 ©2013 Elekta Limited
Figure 3.4 Electron flatness and symmetry points of measurement (IEC standard)
7 Record the results of the flatness and symmetry tests in Table 3.26 and Table 3.27.
Table 3.26 Results for electron flatness and symmetry test (energy level high)
Table 3.27 Results for electron flatness and symmetry test (energy level low)
Accepted by:
The ratio of the maximum absorbed dose, or the minimum absorbed dose to the average
absorbed dose, must not be more than ±5%. This measurement is made across the middle 80% of
the geometrical field size (defined by 50% isodose).
Where:
Field size = 10 cm × 10 cm to 25 cm × 25 cm
(MaxDose + MinDose)
Average =
2
The average percentage difference between the absorbed dose of each half of the radiation field
must not be different by more than 2%. This measurement is made across distances d1 and d2.
3.10.2 Specification for the uniformity test of electron radiation fields (USA
procedure)
3.10.3 Doing the uniformity test of electron radiation fields for MLCi2™
and Agility™ (USA procedure)
Make two measurements on the major axes, with different levels of energy and the largest
available electron applicator.
Note: If you adjust the Autotracking values from the default settings during installation, you must
measure the electron applicator average radiation leakage. See Appendix B - Measuring the
electron applicator average radiation leakage.
a 90%
Distance a = 80% of distance b
Distance b = geometric field size
Distance d1 = d2 = ½ distance a
50%
d1 d2
b
000412 ©2013 Elekta Limited
Applicator size
Energy level Plot direction Flatness % Symmetry %
(cm × cm)
6 MeV 20 x 20 A-B 105.11 100.11
6 MeV 20 x 20 G-T 104.77 100.77
8 MeV 20 x 20 A-B 105.47 100.26
8 MeV 20 x 20 G-T 105.59 101.61
The installation and commissioning of the Elekta products were completed. The applicable tests in the customer
acceptance test (CAT) plan were completed in compliance with the specification. A user manual (Instructions for
Use) was supplied.
156788
INDONESIA
If the Customer Acceptance Tests are completed using an electronic Customer Acceptance Tests
(CAT) document, upload the approved electronic document to the Elekta Customer Lifecycle
Management (CLM) system for equipment registration.
For Customer Acceptance Tests using hardcopies, the BU or Distributor keeps two copies, and the
customer keeps one copy. A copy of the approved Certificate of Acceptance is uploaded to the
CLM for equipment registration.
— Blank page —
Accepted by:
— Blank page —
— Blank page —
Table 5.1 Limits of average leakage radiation inside the patient plane
2,0
1,5
Average %
LEAKAGE
RADIATION
1,0
0,5
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55
ELECTRON ENERGY MeV
IEC 817/98
000249_001
Figure 5.1 Limits of leakage radiation through the beam limiting devices during electron radiation
(reported from IEC 60601-2-1:1:2009 + Amd1:2014)
Note: Do the measurements in air with a 1 cm buildup cap, in compliance with the IEC standard. This
prevents the effects of scattered radiation from the phantom on the measured radiation leakage.
Note: If no applicable buildup cap is available, do the measurements in water at a depth of one cm.
Note that the IEC limits do not include the scattered radiation from the phantom.
Note: The 20 cm × 6 mm applicator is a short applicator and measured with SSD 95 cm, and is not close
to the water surface.
10 Select the electron energy that agrees with the changed settings.
000248_001
Figure 5.2 Measurement points for averaging leakage radiation during electron irradiation
(reported from IEC 60601-2-1:1998 + A1:2002 and :2009 editions)
22 The specified measurement positions are in the Autotracking leakage tests for each electron
applicator.
23 Terminate the radiation.
24 Calculate the average value DLE of all the diode measurements (sum of all measured values
divided by the total number of measurements).
25 Calculate the DLE as a percentage of the maximum absorbed dose on the center axis
(measured in water at step 13 ) and record it in Table 5.2.
Table 5.2 Electron radiation Average Leakage inside the patient plane as a percentage of Dmax
Applicator Size (cm x cm) Electron Energy (MeV) Average Leakage (% wrt
Dmax)
Applicator Size (cm x cm) Electron Energy (MeV) Average Leakage (% wrt
Dmax)
Page 54
Table 5.3 Measurement points for a 6 cm x 6 cm square applicator
L10 -80.0 0.0 0.0 -80.0 -80.0 -80.0 -113.1 -80.0 80.0 -113.1
L11 -100.0 0.0 0.0 -100.0 -94.1 -94.1 -133.1 -94.1 94.1 -133.1
L12 -120.0 0.0 0.0 -120.0 -108.3 -108.3 -153.1 -108.3 108.3 -153.1
L13 -140.0 0.0 0.0 -140.0 -122.4 -122.4 -173.1 -122.4 122.4 -173.1
L14 -160.0 0.0 0.0 -160.0 -136.6 -136.6 -193.1 -136.6 136.6 -193.1
L15 -180.0 0.0 0.0 -180.0 -150.7 -150.7 -213.1 -150.7 150.7 -213.1
L16 -200.0 0.0 0.0 -200.0 -164.9 -164.9 -233.1 -164.9 164.9 -233.1
L17 -220.0 0.0 0.0 -220.0
L18 -240.0 0.0 0.0 -240.0
Page 55
Document ID: 1503568_12
Auto tracking leakage tests
Appendix B - Measuring the electron applicator average radiation leakage
5.3.3 Measurement points for a 14 cm x 14 cm square applicator
Page 56
Table 5.5 Measurement points for a 14 cm x 14 cm square applicator
L10 -160.0 0.0 0.0 -160.0 -148.3 -148.3 -209.7 -148.3 148.3 -209.7
L11 -180.0 0.0 0.0 -180.0 -162.4 -162.4 -229.7 -162.4 162.4 -229.7
L12 -200.0 0.0 0.0 -200.0 -176.6 -176.6 -249.7 -176.6 176.6 -249.7
L13 -220.0 0.0 0.0 -220.0
L14 -240.0 0.0 0.0 -240.0
Page 57
Document ID: 1503568_12
Auto tracking leakage tests
Appendix B - Measuring the electron applicator average radiation leakage
5.3.5 Measurement points for a 25 cm x 25 cm square applicator
Page 58
Table 5.7 Measurement points for a 25 cm x 25 cm square applicator
L1 235.0 0.0 0.0 235.0 217.4 217.4 307.5 217.4 -217.4 307.5
L2 215.0 0.0 0.0 215.0 203.3 203.3 287.5 203.3 -203.3 287.5
L3 195.0 0.0 0.0 195.0 189.1 189.1 267.5 189.1 -189.1 267.5
L4 175.0 0.0 0.0 175.0 175.0 175.0 247.5 175.0 -175.0 247.5
L5 -175.0 0.0 0.0 -175.0 -175.0 -175.0 -247.5 -175.0 175.0 -247.5
L6 -195.0 0.0 0.0 -195.0 -189.1 -189.1 -267.5 -189.1 189.1 -267.5
L7 -215.0 0.0 0.0 -215.0 -203.3 -203.3 -287.5 -203.3 203.3 -287.5
L8 -235.0 0.0 0.0 -235.0 -217.4 -217.4 -307.5 -217.4 217.4 -307.5
Appendix B - Measuring the electron applicator average radiation leakage
Page 59
Document ID: 1503568_12
Auto tracking leakage tests
Appendix B - Measuring the electron applicator average radiation leakage
5.3.7 Measurement points for a 16 cm x 8 cm rectangular applicator
Page 60
Table 5.9 Measurement points for a 16 cm x 8 cm rectangular applicator
L10 -90.0 0.0 0.0 -170.0 -90.0 -90.0 -127.3 -90.0 90.0 -127.3
L11 -110.0 0.0 0.0 -190.0 -104.1 -104.1 -147.3 -104.1 104.1 -147.3
L12 -130.0 0.0 0.0 -210.0 -118.3 -118.3 -167.3 -118.3 118.3 -167.3
L13 -150.0 0.0 0.0 -230.0 -132.4 -132.4 -187.3 -132.4 132.4 -187.3
L14 -170.0 0.0 0.0 -250.0 -146.6 -146.6 -207.3 -146.6 146.6 -207.3
L15 -190.0 0.0 -160.7 -160.7 -227.3 -160.7 160.7 -227.3
L16 -210.0 0.0 -174.9 -174.9 -247.3 -174.9 174.9 -247.3
L17 -230.0 0.0
L18 -250.0 0.0
Page 61
Document ID: 1503568_12
Auto tracking leakage tests
Appendix B - Measuring the electron applicator average radiation leakage
5.3.9 Measurement points for a 14 cm x 6 cm rectangular applicator
Page 62
Table 5.11 Measurement points for a 14 cm x 6 cm rectangular applicator
L10 -80.0 0.0 0.0 -160.0 -80.0 -80.0 -113.1 -80.0 80.0 -113.1
L11 -100.0 0.0 0.0 -180.0 -94.1 -94.1 -133.1 -94.1 94.1 -133.1
L12 -120.0 0.0 0.0 -200.0 -108.3 -108.3 -153.1 -108.3 108.3 -153.1
L13 -140.0 0.0 0.0 -220.0 -122.4 -122.4 -173.1 -122.4 122.4 -173.1
L14 -160.0 0.0 0.0 -240.0 -136.6 -136.6 -193.1 -136.6 136.6 -193.1
L15 -180.0 0.0 -150.7 -150.7 -213.1 -150.7 150.7 -213.1
L16 -200.0 0.0 -164.9 -164.9 -233.1 -164.9 164.9 -233.1
L17 -220.0 0.0
L18 -240.0 0.0
Page 63
Document ID: 1503568_12
Auto tracking leakage tests
Appendix B - Measuring the electron applicator average radiation leakage
Appendix B - Measuring the electron applicator average radiation leakage
Auto tracking leakage tests
— Blank page —
Asia Pacific
T +852 2891 2208
F +852 2575 7133
Japan
T +81 3 6722 3800
F +81 3 6436 4231
China
T +86 10 5669 2800
F +86 10 5669 2900
elekta.com
/elekta
@elekta
/company/elekta