Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ventilation Effects in Confined and Mechanically Ventilated Fires - Lassus Et Al
Ventilation Effects in Confined and Mechanically Ventilated Fires - Lassus Et Al
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: The main objective of this work is to study underventilated and highly underventilated fires in a
Received 12 February 2013 compartment equipped with a mechanical ventilation network. Heptane and dodecane pool fire ex-
Received in revised form periments are performed in a reduced-scale room. A changing-scale analysis is performed in order to
19 June 2013
obtain species concentrations and temperature levels at a larger scale. Carbon dioxide concentration
Accepted 19 July 2013
Available online 31 August 2013
increases linearly with the decreasing of oxygen concentration. Heat release rate depends on ventilation
condition in the compartment and we can distinguish three cases. The first one corresponds to suffi-
ciently ventilated fires, where heat release rate is higher or equal to the one of an open fire and where the
Keywords:
Underventilated fires
reaction is almost complete. The second one includes underventilated fires for oxygen concentration
Froude scaling law ranging between the Minimum Oxygen Concentration of the given fuel and around 7% (this value cor-
Ventilation effects responds to the Minimum Oxygen Concentration of carbon monoxide). At this percentage of oxygen, the
Heat release rate Heat Release Rate is lower than the one of an open fire and the carbon monoxide production is pro-
Heptane portional to oxygen concentration. The third one corresponds to very underventilated fires for oxygen
Dodecane concentration lower than 7%, and where the fire can stop due to a lack of oxygen. In this case, carbon
monoxide concentration increases strongly with the decrease of oxygen concentration.
Ó 2013 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
* Corresponding author. Tel.: þ33 549 366 087. Investigations on fire compartment require experiments. It
E-mail address: leo.courty@ensma.fr (L. Courty). is often necessary to quantify temperature, pressure, species
1290-0729/$ e see front matter Ó 2013 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2013.07.015
88 J. Lassus et al. / International Journal of Thermal Sciences 75 (2014) 87e94
From Zukoski number and the preservation of the Froude number, a Using Zukoski number and the preservation of Froude number, a
dimensionless term appears: dimensionless term appears:
J. Lassus et al. / International Journal of Thermal Sciences 75 (2014) 87e94 89
Table 1
3$s$T03
Prad ¼ (8) Dimensionless term PZu as a function of heat
r0 $cp $g1=2 $l1=2
r release rate.
Q_ (kW) PZu
Radiative heat flux scaling requires therefore the preservation of
1=6
this term, that can lead to T0 flr . However, this term cannot be 5 0.0001
preserved. It results that radiative heat flux does not scale. In order 10 0.0002
20 0.0004
to obtain good agreement between the prototype and the full scale 30 0.0006
compartment, radiative heat flux from wall must not have an in- 50 0.001
fluence on HRR. Consequently, the term Prad (Eq. (8)) must be 75 0.0015
negligible with regard to Zukoski number for HRR obtained from 100 0.0019
energy equation (Eq. (1)).
3. Materials and methods meters. Inlet duct is located at the bottom of the room test at a
0.3 m height and extraction network is located near the ceiling, at a
In order to reduce the cost of fire tests and to be able to carry out 1.7 m height. Acquisition time (temperature, gas velocities, gas
fire tests more reproducible than fire in a compartment of high size, concentrations) is set at 6 s.
a reduced-scale room has been built. This experimental device is a Experiments are performed with heptane and dodecane pool
reduced-scale room based on a 100-cubic-metre compartment, fires. The stainless-steel pans are located in the center of the room
which is cubic and whose wall thickness is 0.3 m. The overall di- test, at a height of 0.5 m, and placed on a load cell to measure fuel
mensions of this reduced scale room are scaled geometrically from consumption as a function of time. Heptane used contains 71% of n-
those of the full scale compartment, resulting in a 8-cubic-metre heptane and has a density of 710 kg m3, a flash point of 4 C and
room test. A picture and a scheme of the experimental setup are a boiling point of 98 C. Dodecane used contains 99% of n-dodecane
presented in Fig. 1. In order to preserve conductive heat flux, walls and has a density of 749 kg m3, a flash point of 74 C and a boiling
have a thickness of 0.2 m. Indeed, in order to preserve the point of 216 C. In order to avoid freeboard effects, fuel quantity is
conductive flux, we have to take the wall thicknesses into account. determined as a function of pan diameter with the relation h/
The term (lwall/rwall$cp,wall)1/2$(g/lr)1/4$dwall must be preserved (cf. D ¼ 11.5%, where h represents the fuel height and D the pan
[24]). This term depends on the nature of the material used to build diameter. Indeed, before each test, water is first poured on the pan
the enclosure and on the thickness of this material. Walls of the and then on the fuel until it reached 1 mm below the pan lip.
full-scale enclosure are made of concrete and are 0.3 m thick. Ac- During the combustion, the location of the fuel/water interface
cording to Quintiere, concrete material has a thermal conductivity remains fixed. Therefore, since the height of the burning fuel de-
between 0.8 and 1.4 W m1 K1, a density between 1900 and creases as combustion progresses, the freeboard length increases
2300 kg m3and a specific heat of 0.88 kJ kg1 K1. If we take the during the experiment. However, this freeboard length increase
maximum of these values, the term written above takes the value appeared to have only a minor effect on the measured combustion
17. For a reduced-scale enclosure in cellular-concrete material, this rate. Fuel is ignited with a butane torch.
term is preserved for walls of a 0.2 m thickness. Different sizes of pan diameter (0.10, 0.15, 0.23, 0.30 and 0.40 m)
Walls are made of reinforced concrete. Scaling HRR imposes the are used. HRR is measured by means of a load cell using Babrauskas’
2
preservation of the quantity Q_ =L5. The powers tested are lower law [23] (Eq. (9)) or calculated on the basis of the oxygen con-
than 130 kW, which corresponds to a maximum HRR of 1 MW at sumption taking into account the incomplete combustion of carbon
full scale. The radiative heat flux from wall must not have an in- monoxide to carbon dioxide.
fluence on heat release rate. To ensure this condition, a comparison
is made for different heat release rates presented on Table 1 and the
Q_ ðt Þ ¼ S$m
_ 00 ðt Þ$DHC (9)
value Prad ¼ 0.00017 is obtained.
For a fire in the reduced scale compartment of 75 kW, the effect As oxygen consumption is difficult to use during under-
of radiative heat flux on HRR can be considered insignificant. ventilated fires because of the oxygen provided by the dilution flow,
A mechanical ventilation network is used. It delivers a flow of 24 HRR is measured by mass loss in this paper. Consequently, for
or 40 m3 h1 (Air Changes Per Hour (ACPH): 3 or 5). Other venti- underventilated fires, HRR is overestimated. The flow rates of gases
lation flows are tested to study ventilation influence on HRR, in the inlet duct and dilution duct is measured with hot wire system
temperatures and species. Ducts have a square section of 0.2 square placed at the entrance of these ducts. Their sensitivities are lower
Fig. 1. Photograph and scheme of the reduced-scale fire compartment with instrumentation.
90 J. Lassus et al. / International Journal of Thermal Sciences 75 (2014) 87e94
than 1%. In the extraction duct, a laser and a fast digital camera are Table 3
used in order to determine gas flow rate with Particle Image Comparison between oxygen concentrations and maximum temperature during full
and reduced scale heptane fires of equivalent heat release rate.
Velocimetry (PIV) technique. Water-cooled MEDTHERM and CAP-
THERM captors are used to measure the radiative heat flux received Parameters Reduced scale Compartment Compartment
by walls. They are placed on the wall at a 0.45 m height and at 0.3 m compartment of 120 m3 of 400 m3
of the center axis, respectively on the inlet side and on the Q_ 20 kW 190 kW 520 kW
extraction side. Their range of sensitivity is [0e0.1] mV (W/m2). [O2] (% vol.) 16 14.9 16.6
Tmax ( C) 130 162 126
Pressure is also measured continuously by a pressure captor that
has a sensitivity of 2 Pa.
Continuous measurements of oxygen, carbon dioxide and car-
described in Prétrel [25]. Hydrogenated Tetra-Propylene (HTP) and
bon monoxide are performed at the entrance of the extraction duct
30% vol. Tri-Butyl-Phosphate (TBP). HTP fire tests were also per-
by on-line analysis. Local measurements of oxygen, carbon dioxide,
formed [15] in a compartment of 120 m3. A detailed description of
carbon monoxide, hydrogen and unburnt hydrocarbons are per-
this compartment is given in Nasr et al. [26]. HTP has a similar
formed in the exhaust duct by probe sampling and analyzed by gas
chemical formula than dodecane. Melis and Audouin [14] only
chromatography. All gas concentration measurements presented in
show fuel mass loss during heat release rate plateau. Maximal heat
this paper are performed at the entrance of the extraction duct in
release rate is estimated using the method of mass loss (Eq. (9)).
order to avoid dilution flow. The temperature measurements in the
Results are presented in Table 3. Good agreements with oxygen
compartment are performed with chromel-alumel thermocouples
concentrations and temperature are found between the results in
(type K) of a 0.5 mm wire diameter; they give values with an un-
the reduced scale room and those in the 400 cubic-meter
certainty of 1.5 C. Other details of experimental device are
compartment. Consequently, the similarity between full-scale
described by Lassus et al. [9] and Lassus [24] and photographs of the
compartments and the scale model is satisfactory. With the 120
experimental setup are presented in Fig. 1. Three fire tests for each
cubic-meter compartment, oxygen concentration and temperature
condition are made to check the reproducibility of the main pa-
are higher and that may be due to inlet duct position in this
rameters. Good reproducibility of temperatures, species concen-
compartment, near the ceiling.
trations and heat release rate are found [24].
4.1. Scaling effects: comparison with full scale compartment fire Ventilation influence is considered in this paragraph for heptane
fires performed with a pan diameter of 0.15 m. The ventilation flow
In order to validate results obtained in the reduced scale room, is ranging between 1 and 7.6 ACPH. This pan diameter allows
scaling effect is studied by comparing species concentrations and obtaining fires sufficiently ventilated. HRR for different ventilation
maximal temperature measured in the experimental device with flows are presented in Fig. 2. HRR obtained for an open fire with the
those obtained during heptane and dodecane fire tests in full-scale same pan diameter (0.15 m) is also presented in this figure. With
rooms. As stated above, HRR is scaled by the preservation of the this pan diameter and for all the ventilation flows, oxygen quantity
term Q2/L5, where L is the characteristic length equal to the cubic initially present in the reduced scale room and the one that is
root of room volume. A heptane fire of 1 MW performed in ICFMP’s supplied by mechanical ventilation allow obtaining a sufficiently
compartment [11] is compared to heptane fire of 28 kW performed ventilated fire.
in the reduced scale room with a pan diameter of 0.23 m, at 3 ACPH For low ventilation flows (1e3 ACPH), HRR reaches a plateau
(Air Change Per Hour). Results are presented in Table 2. ICFMP’s that is almost the same as the one obtained in open conditions:
compartment is similar to a cubic room. Temperature at the fires have a behavior similar to the one in an open fire and there is
exhaust duct, maximal carbon dioxide and Minimum Oxygen no confinement effect. Flame shows the classical structure of
Concentrations are in good agreement for these two scales, despite diffusion flame (Fig. 3, photograph a).
the fact that thermal radiation from the walls is not considered in When ventilation flow increases, flames are sloping (cf. Fig. 3,
this comparison. The difference between CO concentrations ob- photographs b and c). This effect is highlighted by the evolution of
tained during the reduced-scale experiments and ICFMP experi- radiant heat flux in the compartment and is illustrated in Fig. 4. For
ments can be due to the differences in the sampling places in the low ventilation flow, radiant heat fluxes measured on each side of
extraction duct. Indeed, we are comparing different enclosures that
have not been built to scale one as a function of the others; sam-
pling places can therefore be different.
Results obtained for dodecane fire tests performed in the
reduced scale room are also compared to fire tests performed at a
larger scale. Indeed, Melis and Audouin [14] performed fire tests in
a compartment of 400 m3. The experimental enclosure is also
Table 2
Comparison between species concentrations and maximum temperature during full
and reduced scale heptane fires of equivalent heat release rate.
Q_ 1 MW 28 kW
[O2] (% vol.) 12 12.7
[CO2] (% vol.) 6.5 6.1
[CO] (% vol.) 0.01 0.07
Fig. 2. Heat release rates as a function of time obtained with heptane fires performed
Tmax ( C) 255 235
with a pan diameter of 0.15 m at different ACPH.
J. Lassus et al. / International Journal of Thermal Sciences 75 (2014) 87e94 91
Fig. 3. Pictures of heptane flames at 3, 5 and 7.6 Air Changes Per Hour (influence of the
ventilation flow on the flame slope).
25 250
O2
temperature
20 200
Temperature (°C)
15 150
[O2] %
10 100
5 50
0 0
0 500 1000 1500 2000
Time (s)
Fig. 4. Non-dimensional radiant heat flux (ratio Frad/radiant heat flux at 100 s) as a
function of time of heptane fires (pan diameter of 0.1 m and ventilation flow of 3 and Fig. 6. Temperature at the duct entrance and oxygen concentration as functions of
7.6 ACPH). time (heptane fire with a pan diameter of 23 cm at 3 ACPH).
92 J. Lassus et al. / International Journal of Thermal Sciences 75 (2014) 87e94
Fig. 7. Heat release rates of heptane fires performed with a pan diameter of 0.3 m and Fig. 10. Carbon dioxide concentration as a function of oxygen concentration for hep-
at different ACPH. tane fires: present work with pan diameters of 0.23 and 0.3 m at different ACPH and
ICFMP fire tests [11].
0
0 5 10 15 20 25
O2 (%)
2.5 23 cm, 3 ACPH obtained for different compartments (and therefore for different
scales) for the three combustion regimes: sufficiently ventilated
23 cm, 5 ACPH
fires, underventilated fires and very underventilated fires. Values
2 30 cm, 3 ACPH are obtained thanks to scaling laws presented in Section 2.
30 cm, 5 ACPH
1.5 MOC (CO)
CO (%)
5. Conclusion
Fundamentals and Applications, Combustion Institute Central and Western [19] H.C. Hottel, Review: certain laws governing diffusive burning of liquids, Fire
States (USA) and Combustion Institute Mexican National Section and American Research Abstracts and Reviews 1 (1958) 41e44.
Flame Research Committee, 1995, pp. 565e570. [20] V.I. Blinov, G.N. Khudiakov, Certain laws governing diffusive burning of liquids,
[13] N.P. Bryner, E.L. Johnsson, W.M. Pitts, Carbon Monoxide Production in Doklady 113 (1957) 1094e1098.
Compartment Fires: Reduced-Scale Enclosure Test Facility, National Institute of [21] P.H. Thomas, R. Baldwin, A.J.M. Heslden, Buoyant diffusion flames: some
Standards and Technology, 1994. NISTIR-5568. measurements of air entrainment, heat transfer and flame merging, in: 10th
[14] S. Melis, L. Audouin, Effects of vitiation on the heat release rate in mechanically Symposium International on Combustion, 1965, pp. 983e996.
ventilated compartment fires, in: 9th International Symposium on Fire Safety [22] T. Yumoto, Heat transfer from flame to fuel surface in large pool fires, Com-
Science, 2009, pp. 931e942. bustion and Flame 17 (1971) 108e110.
[15] G. Heskestad, Modeling of enclosure fires, in: 14th International Symposium on [23] V. Babrauskas, Ignition Handbook, Fire Science Publishers, 2003, pp. 41e140
Combustion, 1973, pp. 1021e1030. (Chapter 4).
[16] R.I. Emori, K. Saito, A study of scaling laws in pool and crib fires, Combustion [24] J. Lassus, Risque d’inflammation de gaz imbrûlés au cours d’un incendie en
Science and Technology 31 (1983) 217e231. milieu confiné-ventilé. PhD thesis, University of Poitiers, 2009 (in French).
[17] J.G. Quintiere, Fundamentals of Fire Phenomena, Wiley and Sons, 2006 [25] H. Prétrel, Interprétation des essais FLIP. Report, IRSN, 2002.
(Chapter 12). [26] A. Nasr, S. Suard, H. El-Rabii, J.P. Garo, L. Gay, L. Rigollet, Heat feedback to the
[18] E.E. Zukoski, Fluid dynamic aspects of room fires, in: 1st International Sym- fuel surface of a pool fire in an enclosure, Fire Safety Journal (2013) in press,
posium on Fire Safety Science, 1984, pp. 1e30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.firesaf.2012.12.005.