You are on page 1of 4

87.

The Coming of Iron to Some More African Peoples


Author(s): G. A. Wainwright
Source: Man, Vol. 43 (Sep. - Oct., 1943), pp. 114-116
Published by: Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2792370
Accessed: 27-06-2016 08:42 UTC

Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
http://about.jstor.org/terms

JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted
digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about
JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.

Wiley, Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland are collaborating with
JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Man

This content downloaded from 128.197.26.12 on Mon, 27 Jun 2016 08:42:25 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
Nos. 86, 87] MAN [September-October, 1943.

direction very little has been done at all, and of their own past skill and taste. The new society,
where somnething has been done, it has been undone built on a balanced economy, agricultural and
by individual caprice or neglect. In technological industrial, requires a balanced technology and
work, a Museum is as important as a record office aesthetic. In surviving masterpieces of metal-
is in administration, and it is a frequent and work, wood-carving, ceramic, and textiles is the
painful experience that if you do not secure what tangible proof of past proficiency, local initiative,
you think you do not want, you cannot obtain it and continuous development, as has been realized
when you do want it. Africans seem to have a already in other regions nearer home. What has
keener historical sense than most Europeans. been done in the last generation in Cardiff and
They resent the assumption that they have con- Dublin is possible and urgently desirable in West
tributed nothing of value in the past, and have a Africa-a permanent and efficient exhibit and
corresponding pride and interest in the evidence reference-collection of the material arts.

THE COMING OF IRON TO SOME MORE AFRICAN PEOPLES. By G. A. Wainwright.

8Q7 In MAN, 1942, 61, I published the tradi- The Barolong are able to add an interesting
tions about the coming of iron to the piece of information to this, for they still know
Bushongo, to Uganda, and to Angola, and in that their ancestors originally came from north
MAN, 1943, 67, those about the Winainwanga of the Equator. This came out in a dispute about
between Lakes Tanganyika and Nyasa. The land which was contested before Mr. Theal. On
dates for these occurrences could be established this occasion it was stated that the original home
with considerable certainty as A.D. 500 for the was on the shores of a great lake, where at one
Bushongo, about A.D. 1000 for Uganda, about time of the year shadows were cast towards the
A.D. 1475 for Angola, and at some date in the north, and that from there the people migrated
seventeenth century for the Winamwanga. The southwards.5 They seem to have crossed the
present article adds the information which a few Zambesi during the eleventh and twelfth cen-
more tribes can give about the early iron industry turies,6 and the Limpopo about the middle of the
among them. fifteenth century.7

Basuto.-In South Africa the Basuto claim that Bergdama.-The Dama or Damara, with or
their first ancestors were Morolong and his son without the prefix Berg, were in South West
Noto. The first of these words means 'Smith ' Africa before the Hereros arrived about A.D. 1550.
and the second 'Hammer,' noto being the Basuto They were also the aborigines when the HIotten-
pronunciation of the widespread Bantu root for tots entered the country.8 To-day they are the
'iron' nyondo.1 One of the tribes of the great very humblest race in the country, yet it is well-
Basuto family is still called Barolong after their known that it is they who were the first black-
famous ancestor, and they take iron for their smiths there.9 They made the iron spearheads
totem in honour of their great chief Noto.2 of the Hereros and forged their iron axes,10 and at
Ellenberger and Macgregor have collected a the end of the eighteenth century those Bergdama
great number of genealogies of the various Basuto who lived by the sea were forging iron and copper
tribes right back to Morolong and Noto, and in for the Namas.1" It was the Damas who have
this way have calculated that Morolong lived taught the Namas (Hottentots) to smith iron and
about A.D. 1270 and Noto about A.D. 1240.3 It copper.12 Moreover, in every instance it was
may be, however, that these dates are too early,
for the authors have allowed thirty years to a 5 G. McColl Theal, Ethnography and Condition of South
chieftainship.4 Africa before A.D. 1505, p. 184.
6 Ellenberger and Macgregor, op. cit., p. 333.
1 Crabtree in Journal of the African Society, xxx, 7 L. Fouch6, Mapungubwe, p. 45.
p. 334. As the word for ' iron 'the Basuto have replaced 8 H. Vedder, South West Africa in Early Times (trans.
noto, nyondo, with the later -rale (Sir H. H. Johnston, A C. G. Hall), pp. 152, 153 and cf. pp. 164, 165. Two
Comparative Study of the Bantu and Semi-Bantu Lan- genealogical trees give this date. Id., The Berg Damara
guages, i, p. 286), confining the older word to the special- in The Native Tribes of Soi4th West Africa (edited by
ized meaning of 'hammer.' H. P. Smit, Cape Town, 1928), pp. 40, 41.
2 Dornan, Pygmies and Bushmen of the Kalahari 9 Id., South West Africa, pp. 28, 109.
(London, 1925), p. 245. 10 Id., The Berg Damara, p. 43.
3 Ellenberger and Macgregor, History of the Basuto, 11 Id., South West Africa, p. 27.
p. 393. 12 Id., The Nama in The Native Tribes of South West
4 Ellenberger and Macgregor, op. cit., p. 333. Africa, p. 126. The Namas are a Hottentot tribe, p. 190.
[ 114 ]

This content downloaded from 128.197.26.12 on Mon, 27 Jun 2016 08:42:25 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
September-October, 1943.] MAN [No. 87

Damas who showed the first Europeans where the only mean that the original namiies have been
copper deposits lay. Nama-ized or translated into Nama.
Vedder thinks that many of the Damas had The traditional connexion between the Damas
acquired their skill as blacksmiths from the and the Ama-Xosa is accepted by Lebzelter, yet
Ovambo, for when an Ovambo smith was accused the Damas seem to have been originally a
of witchcraft he used to flee to Hereroland where dwarfish black race from central Africa,19 while
many of the Damas were living. Moreover, the Ama-Xosa are Bantus and full-sized men.
travelling Ovambo smiths have been accustomed The apparent discords between this tradition,
to go south into Hereroland and even as far as their small size, and their ability as iron-workers,
Namaland. They made a great impression and can perhaps be reconciled by supposing that it
the year 1840 is called 'The Year of the Axe ' was only a few Ama-Xosa or Bechuana wanderers
because the Herero chief then learned the craft who came from the north and east and estab-
from one of them and made his first axe with his lished themselves among the small-sized abori-
own hands.13 In order to mine and smelt their gines. Among such people the newcomers would
iron the Ovambo used to go northwards into naturally have become chiefs, and it is to the
southern Angola'.14 arrival of a chief and hisfollowers that the tradition
However, the Damas' own account of their refers. It is no doubt the story of the aristocracy
acquisition of the art of iron-working puts a who have by now become fused with the abori-
different light on all this. Their story is that gines, so that they are no longer recognizable, and
they originate from a number of young Ama- the aborigines now tell it as their own. By about
Xosa, who got. separated from their tribe. A.D. 1400 Ama-Xosa or Bechuana such as these
Thereupon they elected, as chief, one of their immigrants would no doubt have been in full
number who understood how to make iron possession of iron, and could have brought with
weapons. He was A-a-nanub the first chief of them the knowledge of how to work it.
the Damas, and brought them safely through the It is interesting to note that even such famous
desert to Ovamboland. He taught the Ovambo smiths as the Damas also used stone knives at
the art of working iron, and the Damas became least as recently as 1842. Their cutting up a
the slaves of the Ovambo and made their weapons hippopotamus with such knives is recorded in
for them. Later on the Damas trekked south- that year.20 The Hottentot tribe of the Nama
ward from Ovamboland, as they wanted to be were still making stone knives at the end of the
free.15 Otherwise it is said that after a long time nineteenth century.21
the Ovambo under their chief Narirab drove out The upshot of the foregoing seems to be that
the Damas, when for the most part they fled about the year 1400, according to Vedder's
southwards to Namaland. This was in the calculation, some wandering Bechuana or Ama
middle of the seventeenth century, for Narirab Xosa arrived in South West Africa from the east
was born about A.D. 1640.16 or. north. They came under the leadership of a
The Damas have preserved a list of their chiefs man whom, like other tribes, they had elected
all the way back to A-a-nanub. By means of chief on account of his ability as a blacksmith.22
this and taking a chieftainship to represent twenty On arrival they settled down as an aristocracy
five years it is computed that A-a-nanub would among the dwarfish black Damas whom they
have been born about A.D. 1390.17 Unfortunately would have found in the country, and inter-
the list perhaps has to be received with a certain married with them. Presumably they taught
amount of caution, for the names of the chiefs are these aborigines how to smelt and forge iron and
derived from the Nama (Hottentot) language, the made them do it for them.23
Damas having lost their own.18 But this need
19 Id., South West Africa, pp. 116, 117.
13 Id., South West Africa, p. 158. 20 Id., op. cit., p. 233.
14 Id., op. cit., pp. 28, 158. 21 Id., The Nama, p. 126.
15 Id., op. cit., p. 114. 22 Like Mussuri in Angola (MAN, 1942, p. 107) and
16 Id., op. cit., p. 115. Musyani of the Winamwanga (MAN, 1943, 67).
17 But see the section on the Ovambo for some 23 We have this state of affairs in Ruanda. There the
remarks on this date (p. 116). immigrant Ba-Tutsi were iron-workers, but after con-
18 Id., loc. cit. The Damas have everywhere given up quering the indigenous Ba-Hutu they made them do the
their own speech in favour of that of their various over- iron-working for them and also cultivate the fields for
lords. Those in the north speak the language of the them. Loupias in Anthropos, 1908, p. 9; Pages, in
Hottentots among whom they live, p. 108; Id., The Berg Anthropos, 1919-20, p. 959.
Damara, p. 41. However, they do not speak it well, 24 Vedder, South West Africa,. pp. 164, 165. See
which is taken to suggest that the change is recent; Id., pp. 152, 153, for the dating of the Herero migration to
op. cit., p. 74. about A.D. 1550.

[ 115 ]

This content downloaded from 128.197.26.12 on Mon, 27 Jun 2016 08:42:25 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
No. 87] MAN [September-October,, 1943.
Ovamb)o. -It has been seen that the Ovambo are ship.31 If he had calculated both dates on the
miiuch mixed up with A-a-nanub's arrival in the same basis, they would have come out very
land, with the early history of the Damas, and nearly the same, A-a-nanub being the earlier by
fromii then onwards with the Damas' iron industry. a couple of generations. Further, A-a-nanub is
The Ovanibo seem to have arrived at about the supposed to have been an Aina-Xosa or Bechuana,
samne tiine as the Herero, for the succession of and the Ovambo and Herero as well as the
their chiefs takes us back to the same date, i.e. to Bechuana all belong to the same group.32 More-
about A.D. 1550 on Vedder's calculation.24 They over, A-a-nanub and the Ovambo seem to have
belong to the same group as the Herero and come by much the same route. It, therefore,
Bechuana,25 and moved westwards until they seems legitimate to suppose that they all formed
struck the Kubango River. They crossed it, and part of the one movement, and that it was this
while some of them reached the Kunene where it that introduced the art of iron-working into South
tuirns west, others followed the Kubango south- West Africa. But it would still remain a matter
wards. A place, Osimolo, on this river remains of speculation whether A-a-nanub arrived about
a sacred centre for all the Ovambo tribes.26 1400 and the Ovambo about 1450, or whether the
In spite of what the Dama say, the Ovambo dates should be about 1500 and 1550 respectively.
were in possession of iron at the time of their
arrival in the country. For their tradition tells Ondulu.-Unfortunately definite and useful
of spears with iron shafts as well as of others with information such as the foregoing is all too rare.
wooden ones, of the so-called Ovambo knives, Only too often all knowledge of the coming of iron
arrows, hoes, and even of iron bows, and pots. has been lost, and the enquirer is regaled with
It also tells of the ornaments of copper worn by nothing more satisfactory than that which was
the young men. All the iron utensils dating gathered in Ondulu. The country lies three days'
from the time of their arrival are also said to journey north of Fort Belmonte between the
have been afterwards collected by the chiefs and River Kwanza and its tributary the Kutato..
stored up in a certain sanctuary.27 Here the people said 'God placed our ancestors
The Dama and Ovambo traditions, however, 'down by this mountain of iron. They could not
do not seem to be really contradictory. It is 'tell what it was, but considered it to be different
clear that the knowledge of iron-working could 'from the ordinary rocks. Somebody made a
not have been obtained in the present Ovambo- ' bellows of clay, then killed a small deer, and tied
land, for it possesses neither mountains, nor ' its skin over the cavities to cause the wind to
stones, nor mines of either iron or copper.28 Now, 'blow. It would not answer, but broke. Some-
seeing that the Ovambo entered their present ' one else said, " Let us make one of wood." So
country from the north, and that they still go ' they went to the forest, cut a tree, made a
back north into southern Angola to mine and ' bellows, made charcoal, got some of the stone
smelt their iron,29 it seems probable that they ' and put it into the fire, and it got soft. Our
knew how to do it before their arrival or at least ' ancestors before this cultivated with wooden
learned of it on their journey. Was it here that ' hoes. They tried then to make an iron one.
the Damas and their first chief A-a-nanub taught ' They succeeded, and that is how we began to
them the art, or, being there first, shewed them ' cultivate with iron hoes.'33
the mine, just as later on they shewed their Vague as this is, it is better than nothing, for
copper deposits to the European prospectors ? it shews that the people still remember a time
A-a-nanub seems to have come by much the same when they were ignorant of iron. It also shews
route as the Ovambo, and the Damas to have that though they now use wooden bellows, iron
remained for a long time in Ovamboland. had been introduced to them by people using
Vedder worked out A-a-nanub's date as about pottery ones. Yet again it shews that in this case
1400, taking 25 years to a chieftainship,30 but in at any rate the wooden bellows, which are so
calculating the arrival of the Ovambo to about common in some parts of Africa, have super-
1550 he takes onily twenty years to a chieftain- seded the original pottery ones because these are
25 Id., op. cit., p. 242. so liable to break.
26 Id., op. cit., pp. 154, 155. 31 Id., op. cit., pp. 164, 165. He says, however, that
27 Id., op. cit., p. 158. one chief is known to have ruled for 45 years and another
28 Id., loc. cit.
for 30 years.
29 Id., op. cit., pp. 28, 158. 32 Id., op. cit., p. 242.
3 I d., op. cit., p. 115. 33 Read Journal of the African Society, 1902, pp. 48, 49.

[ 116 ]

This content downloaded from 128.197.26.12 on Mon, 27 Jun 2016 08:42:25 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms

You might also like