Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PURPOSE : to create a comfortable defect management tool with the ability to accumulate IS and analyze informa-
tion on the detected defects on construction sites, adding external users to the system, organize defect fixing and control.
NEW FUNCTIONALITY INTENDS: every defect / violations / task can be marked in floor plan line and add de-
tails about defects / violations / task. Person responsible for defects may mark it as fixed by uploading a proof pictures or
adding a comment. The user who controls the defects, can mark that it has been tested and close or reject it (control
function). Notifications are being sent out about actions with defect entries.
Subcontractors, contractos, construction supervisor, author’s supervision will be able to connect to the IS to view,
create or eliminate defects that are attributed to them.
*** In the following text , where a “defect” is indicated in the functionality, must also be applied to violations and tasks.
1. Provide that the defect section also appear in the top toolbar. Apply filtering options: HEAVY / GLASS and accord-
ing to the project implementer - NAMS and other group companies. Filters - product group, project implementer,
project. Show in common filter if there is at least one recording / defect in a plan.
1.2. In the project summary show the total amount of all defects, tasks, violations for each project individually. For
each type indicate the number of status - closed, active . For example, a total of 100 defects in the project, of which 10
are active .
1.3. XLS export is not expected .
2.5. New audits are loaded into the Documents section, which are automatically reflected in the Defects section. Existing de-
fects / irregularities / tasks that were added to previous plans / audits are retained in the new audit. The audit system
takes the project from DOCUMENTS folder automatically. It must be ensured that the defects are transferred in exact
coordinates, transferred correctly, without offsets. The new audit preserves the history of the previous audit - records,
statuses, comments, added persons, etc., absolutely everything that has been done up to a certain point is preserved.
It must be possible to trace the date and time when each audit is loaded. It is not necessary to see which defects to
which the audit was added. All defects must be seen from the latest version.
By type:
By status
No. pk
5.1.1.
5.1.2.
5.1.3.
5.1.4.
5.1.5.
5.1.6.
5.1.7.
5.1.8.
5.1.9.
5.1.10.
5.1.13.
5.1.14.
5.1.15.
5.1.16.
5.1.17.
5.1.18.
5.1.19.
5.1.20.
5.1.21.
5.1.22.
5.1.23.
5.1. ALL activities must have a history of who, when and what activities have been performed. The defect history
appears next to each defect.
5.2. Required fields are changed / adjusted below each company's settings. You must have default settings when
creating a project. See section 11 for more details.
a) Reclamations can only be prevented through the reclamations section by uploading a proof of elimination. The defect can
be “closed”: 1) through the defect section manually, 2) through the reclamation section, if the reclamation is eliminated, the
defect in the defect section also closes automatically. If the defect has already been closed, the confirmation of the reclama-
tion elimination did not move to the defect section, if not closed, then it was transferred, so the information included in the
reclamation must be a link back to the defect section:
6.1. The link to Reclamation appears in the defect. In the Reclamation a link to the Defect.
6.2. It must be possible to link a Reclamation from the defect section to a previously created Main-Reclama-
tion, so at the time of linking, select from the Main-Reclamation Register by searching for the Main-Reclama-
tion number.
Option only required from WEB. In the side of the Reclamation, it must also be possible to create this link, the
selection must offer all defects of the specific project with the type "Defect"
6.3. In the Defects section, provide an indication that the linked Reclamation is still open.
1. Roles
Each company needs to create a role matrix with roles, role accesses, and actions that can be performed.
7.1. Internal and external users will be distinguished under the "project participants" section. The section retains the ex-
isting principle - user (name, surname) + role (IS role). The PROJECT PARTICIPANTS section should be supple-
mented with “company” (the company to which the person is linked appears automatically in a separate column).
7.2. Need to create roles:
7.2.1. CONSTRUCTION SUPERVISOR - 2 options: 1) be able to create a defect, close the defect, add a comment, fol-
low the correspondence (see history) 2) defects / violations / tasks that are not created, can be seen and commented if
added to a specific defect as “add binding persons ”(see Table 5.1).
7.2.2. AUTHOR SUPERVISOR - 2 options: 1) be able to create a defect, close the defect, add a comment, follow the
correspondence (see history) 2) defects / violations / tasks that are not created, be able to see and comment if added to a
specific defect as “add binding persons ’.
7.2.3. CUSTOMER - 2 options: 1) it must be possible to create a defect, close the defect, add a comment, follow the cor-
respondence (see history) 2) defects / violations / tasks that are not created, must be able to see and, if added to a specific
defect as “ add binding persons ". Binding House, EXD.
7.2.4. SUBCONTRACTOR MANAGER - 2 options: 1) be able to eliminate the created defects, reject the defect, add a
comment, follow the correspondence (see history) 2) defects / violations / tasks that are not created, can be seen and
commented if added to a specific defect as "Add binding persons". Binding House, EXD.
7.3. other users who have not created the respective defect cannot close or correct the defect, it can only be created by
the creator - USER + system administrator. It is not allowed for other users to make corrections to the defect. For exam-
ple, a construction supervisor may create a defect but cannot correct a BV defect. Binding for Namam, EXD.
NOTE: Role names and access for external users will be specified in agreement with UPB Nams and EXD.
1. Criteria of rights
8.1. New criteria of rights at the global, departmental, project level.
9.1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
Information on defect / violation / task attachments (pictures, elimination statements) and comments
1. Notifications
10.1. The system uses the existing notification mechanism (appears on the IS desktop + e-mail) + additionally sends to
persons, if they are indicated in the field of the defect / violation / task entry “Persons who will see the entry” (5.1.14.p.),
To whom notifications should be sent - reference to Table 5.1.
Currently, the notification period is already embedded in the IS setup, the sending interval is not possible for each com-
pany to define its own.
For a new defect / violation / task - to “Responsible person”, “Persons who will see the record”. Not sent with
Draft.
For a renewed defect - to “Applicant”, “Responsible person”, “Persons who will see the record”.
For the button "Fix defect" - to "Applicant", "Persons who will see the record".
About the button "Close defect" - to "Responsible person", "Persons who will see the record".
About the “Reject” button - to “Applicant”, “Persons who will see the record”.
The fact that the deadline for elimination of the defect was approaching (3 days) - to “Applicant”, “Responsible
person”.
11.1.table
Must be able to filter by fields :
Project
Date
Number
Tips
Priority
Submitter
Company of submitter
NOTE: must be able to filter by the fields used (the exact list of fields will be specified later)
1. Settings
13.1. Provide fields for each company to show / not show in the interface (Table 11.1)
1. Table
No.
1 3 .1 .1
1 3.1 .2
1 3 . 1 .3
1 3 . 1 .4
1 3 . 1 .6
13.1. 7
13.1. 8
13.1.9.
Rating -
Deadline -
1. Defect report
17.1. Preparation of the report - printout on pdf (according to the example of pdf printout of the Occupational Safety
Survey).
17.2. Before printing a defect report, it must be possible to filter “Applicable to (company)”, “Responsible person”,
“type of defect”, etc., according to the filter (DD survey functionality), it must be possible to mark several in one filter.
For example, put all the “objects / criteria” to be filtered next to the filter, then print the report with a choice in LV, ENG
languages.
17.3. Multiple defects can be exported in one report based on the filtered information (filtering section).
17.4. A printout of the report in English must also be provided.
17.5. Include all fields in the defect report + close-up of the drawing. When printing a report, it must be possible to 1)
print with a close-up - YES / NO; 2) print with a picture - YES / NO; 3) Print with picture and close-up. The diameter of
the drawing around the point is determined in the design settings (point 16.1).
Options to print the act in different ways, 4 options "Print Act with":
• Fields + cutout
• Fields + defect pictures
• Fields - prevention pictures
• Fields + defect pictures + cutout
Example of a report (to be specified during development):
1. Summary of defects
18.1 Summary of defects / violations by project and by all projects together - Oracle BI. It will be specified which analytical
data must appear in the OBI.
Other remarks
export works with dwg , if a pdf is needed , then project manager can convert it himself.