Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Cpcu 500
Cpcu 500
125
Section 8. Optimizing Risk for Strategic Advantage
18.a.
Put simply, strategic risks are any factors that could affect the business. They
include the upside and downside associated not only with a business strategy
itself but also with the implementation of a strategy. Strategic risks can be
created and affected by external factors such as economic conditions,
consumer demand, or government regulations, or by internal factors such as
an organization’s structure, culture, or processes. Because strategic risks may
have far reaching rami cations that can alter the course of an organization's
future, illustrating their importance can be an effective tool in convincing
decision makers of the value of a holistic risk management program.
People often confuse strategic risk with operational risk, but here’s a good
way to distinguish the two: With operational risks, the focus is often on
making sure that things (whether they are products or processes) are done
right; with strategic risks, the focus is on doing the right things and making
the right decisions to ensure the organization achieves its strategic goals.
126
fi
2
127
fi
fi
fl
fi
Section 8. Optimizing Risk for Strategic Advantage
Two metrics that play a big role in assessing strategic risks are risk appetite
and risk threshold. Risk appetite represents how much risk the organization
wants to take on. It’s essentially a target. Meanwhile, risk threshold represents
the total range of uncertainty the organization is able to accept.
128
fi
fi
k
fi
fi
fi
Topic 18. Strategic Risk and Management
129
fi
fi
fi
fi
Section 8. Optimizing Risk for Strategic Advantage
130
fi
Topic 18. Strategic Risk and Management
1. Strategic risk is the most intangible and abstract of the four risk
quadrants.
2. The goal is to use information about strategic risks to make informed
decisions that optimize the risk-reward ratio.
3. During Analyzing Environments stages of the strategic management
process would an organization use methods such as Porter's Five Forces
Analysis and PESTLE Analysis.
4. Porter's Five Forces analysis methods concentrates on an organization's
competitive environment.
5. Strategic risk can be created and affected by external factors or internal
factors. Resource allocation is considered an internal factor.
6. Clark's Electronics is considering launching new technology for the
medical industry. Before investing major resources in the project, the
company decided to perform a SWOT analysis. The fact that there are new
medical industry regulations pending would fall under Threats of a SWOT
analysis.
7. The four SWOT headings are strengths, weaknesses, threats and
Opportunities.
8. Taylor owns Paoli Hardware, a mid-sized hardware store with 25
employees. Paoli Hardware has won best local hardware store 3 years in a
row. Taylor would like to expand operations and has undertaken a SWOT
analysis.
131
Section 8. Optimizing Risk for Strategic Advantage
9. His most dedicated customers are generally over 40 years old and
engaged in small house projects, but his biggest revenue generator continues
to be the sale of lumber. He would like to obtain more commercial customers
and increase lumber sales. One of the major complaints Taylor hears from his
customers is the dif culty nding local contractors. So, he is considering hiring
a general contractor at the store who would also make house calls to assist
customers. This will allow him to bill for labor and increase the sale of his
products, but he is concerned it may increase his insurance claims and
premiums. One of the younger store employees suggested they create a
website to expand sales to on-line purchases and target electronic
advertisements to commercial accounts. Taylor is not sure that he has the
expertise to maintain a website and run the store. The employee claims to
know a company that can maintain a website for Paoli at minimal cost. Taylor
believes the website is a good idea and will increase sales of lumber. To
protect Paoli from increases in the cost of lumber, Taylor is considering a
forward contract with the lumber yard. When Taylor completes his SWOT
analysis, Strength of the SWOT analysis will he place reputation. Technological
advancements could Taylor’s SWOT analysis consider an opportunity or a
threat, or both an opportunity and a threat. The suppliers bargaining power
to drive prices up, affected by Paoli’s ability to negotiate a forward contract
with a lumber supplier. If Taylor completed a PESTLE analysis instead of a
SWOT analysis, the PESTLE analysis would include Increase in competition
132
fi
fi
Topic 19. Applying Strategic Risk Management
133
4
134
fi
fi
fi
fi
fi
Topic 19. Applying Strategic Risk Management
135
fi
fl
fi
fi
fi
Section 8. Optimizing Risk for Strategic Advantage
136
fi
fi
fi
Topic 19. Applying Strategic Risk Management
137
fi
l
fi
Section 8. Optimizing Risk for Strategic Advantage
138
fl
fi
fi
fl
SECTION 9. BREAKING DOWN RISK
MODELING
139
Section 9. Breaking Down Risk Modeling
140
fl
y
fi
fl
Topic 20. Probability Analysis
141
fi
fi
fi
fi
fi
fi
Section 9. Breaking Down Risk Modeling
142
n
fi
Topic 20. Probability Analysis
(1) For example, the outcomes (called random variables) that can be cast
from a die are 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and each probability is 1/7. By plotting the
possible outcomes 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 on the X axis of the graph and the probability
of each outcome on the Y axis, a probability distribution graph is obtained.
(2) 'Mutually exclusive' means that outcomes do not overlap. The result of
throwing a die cannot be 1 and 2 at the same time. 'Collectively exhaustive'
means that the probability of all outcomes is 1 or 100%.
(3) A probability distribution shows a probabilistic estimate of a particular
set of circumstances or each possible outcome. Afterwards, central tendency or
dispersion shows likelihood of particular future events. As a result, we can say
that it is possible to see likelihood of particular future events through a
probability distribution. Note, however, that the CPCU 500 sometimes
distinguishes strictly what a probability distribution shows.
(4) A continuous probability distribution can sometimes appear to be
discrete probability distributions using a countable number of bins (event
categories). For example, the probability distribution for students' height can
be expressed in groups of 161 to 170 cm, 171 to 180 cm, and 181 to 190 cm.
Discrete probability distributions are characterized by a nite number of
possible outcomes, but this is a continuous probability distribution.
143
fi
Section 9. Breaking Down Risk Modeling
144
fi
fi
fi
n
145
n
146
fi
fi
Topic 20. Probability Analysis
(1) Note that even if you use normal distribution in various stories, you only
have to be careful about which values are to be placed on the x-axis. For
example, an insurer wants to hire the appropriate number of underwriters.
One underwriter can have 500 U/W reviews per month. The average number
of U/W reviews is 2,000 monthly and the standard deviation is 500. How many
people should be employed to hire enough underwriters with at least 80%
con dence? The x-axis is the number of U/W reviews, and the cumulative
probability of 84.13% is one standard deviation from the mean of 2,500. 50%
+ 34.13% = 84.13%. To handle 2,500 cases, ve underwriters must be hired.
Since people cannot be split like 4.8 people, the closest value of at least 80%
is 5 people.
147
fi
fi
fi
fi
fi
fi
fi
fi
fi
fi
fi
fi
fi
fi
fi
n
fi
Section 9. Breaking Down Risk Modeling
148
fi
fi
fi
Topic 21. Value at Risk and Trend Analysis
149
k
fi
fi
4
fi
fi
fi
Section 9. Breaking Down Risk Modeling
150
fi
fi
fi
k
fi
fl
fi
Topic 21. Value at Risk and Trend Analysis
151
s
The solid portion of the linear regression line approximates the trend of the
historical data. The dashed extension of the regression line projects annual
numbers of machinery losses for levels of output (in units of 100,000) beyond
the range of this particular historical data.
In this example, the indicated value for b is 2.46 machinery losses. The
indicated value for m is 0.035, implying that with each 100,000-ton increase
in output, 0.035 additional machinery losses can be expected. y = 0.035x +
2.46, where: y is the dependent variable, x is the independent variable, b is the
y-intercept, m is the slope of the line
152
fi
Topic 21. Value at Risk and Trend Analysis
153
s
For each pathway in the diagram, the end probability represents the
likelihood that every event in the pathway will occur. This probability is
calculated by multiplying together the probability of each event in the
pathway that occurs after the initial accidental event (for example, in the
worst case scenario .80 × .10 × .05 = .004). The sum of all probabilities at the
end of the diagram should equal 1 (for example, .004 + .076 + .036 + .684 +
.20 = 1).
Like a decision tree, an event tree creates a visual portrayal of event
sequences and outcomes. Speci cally, it illustrates the potential effectiveness
of control systems following accidental events and accounts for timing, other
contributing factors, and domino effects. But one of the limitations of event
tree analysis is that it typically provides only two options—success or failure—
and thereby fails to re ect the complexity of some processes or products (for
example, some components or barriers may not fail completely).
154
fi
fi
fi
fl
s
fi
fi
fi
fi
Topic 21. Value at Risk and Trend Analysis
155
fi
fi
fi
fi
fi
fl
Section 9. Breaking Down Risk Modeling
156
SECTION 10. DIVING INTO DATA
157
Section 10. Diving Into Data
158
fi
fl
fi
fl
fi
2
fi
Topic 22. Big Data and Traditional Data Analysis
159
fi
fi
a
fi
fi
fl
fi
fi
fi
Section 10. Diving Into Data
160
fi
fi
fi
fi
fi
a
fi
fi
fi
Topic 22. Big Data and Traditional Data Analysis
161
fi
fi
fi
s
162
fl
fi
s
163
fi
Section 10. Diving Into Data
164
fi
fi
fi
s
fi
fi
fi
Topic 22. Big Data and Traditional Data Analysis
165
fi
fi
fi
s
166
fi
fi
g
fi
fi
fi
fi
4
167
s
fi
Section 10. Diving Into Data
168
fi
s
fl
fl
fi
fl
fi
Topic 23. Modern Data Analysis and Data-Driven Decision Making
169
fi
t
fi
fi
Section 10. Diving Into Data
170
fi
fi
fi
fi
fi
fi
fi
SECTION 11. BUILDING CONSENSUS
171
Section 11. Building Consensus
172
fl
fi
2
fi
fl
Topic 24. Communicating and Collaborating About Risk
173
fi
fl
fi
fi
s
fi
fi
fl
fi
Section 11. Building Consensus
174
fi
fi
Topic 24. Communicating and Collaborating About Risk
175
fi
fi
Section 11. Building Consensus
11. Carla, the risk manager, was asked by senior management to deliver a
presentation on cyber risk at an all employees meeting. Even though she was
only allotted 30 minutes for her presentation, Carla felt that cyber risk was a
very real risk for the corporation and she wanted employees to leave with
some fear of it. She wanted to provide employees with as much technical
information as possible, and familiarize them with all of the important jargon.
Less than 20 minutes into her presentation, Carla could tell that many of the
employees were not paying any attention to her presentation. Analyze your
audience steps in the communication process had Carla failed to consider.
176
Topic 25. Collaborating With Experts About Risk and Delivering Your Message
177
fi
fi
s
178
fi
Topic 25. Collaborating With Experts About Risk and Delivering Your Message
179
s
fi
fi
fi
Section 11. Building Consensus
[THE END]
180
fi
fi
fi
fi
fi