Professional Documents
Culture Documents
American Political Science Association
American Political Science Association
Barton
Review by: Charles D. Elder
The American Political Science Review, Vol. 65, No. 4 (Dec., 1971), pp. 1158-1159
Published by: American Political Science Association
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1953510 .
Accessed: 31/12/2014 18:06
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of
content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms
of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
American Political Science Association is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to
The American Political Science Review.
http://www.jstor.org
a number of study exercises, some relatively various techniques for studying "object sys-
simplistic, others demanding more than the tems." While Barton does provide a limited bib-
reader is likely to be prepared to do on the liography, he, like Abt, does not attempt even a
basis of the text. cursory survey of the literature. His final chap-
After introducing the reader to simple flow ter "A Survey of Simulation Applications"
diagram conventions, Barton uses a number of does not contain a single citation. This is
relatively simple but illuminating flow charts to somewhat ironical in that Barton makes a
illustrate and summarize his arguments. The strong argument for the importance of docu-
book develops very slowly and apparently is in- mentation when constructing simulations. The
tended to move progressively from the simple same apparently does not hold when writing
to the more complex. However, the progression books.
is far from uniform and the chapters are un- While some simulation and gaming practi-
even in detail and the level of prior sophistica- tioners may find succor in Abt's uncritical ex-
tion presumed. For example, a person with- position of the faith or enjoy some of Barton's
out some training in statistics or probability inside dope, I suspect that most will find both
theory is likely to find parts of the chapter on of these books disappointing introductions to
Monte Carlo techniques exceedingly difficult, the subject. Although the authors of both books
if not impossible, to follow. obviously have had extensive experience with
The continuity of the book also suffers from their subject matter, more thorough attention to
a fairly lengthy digression on computer sys- the literature would have added much, not least
tems. Barton's advice on computer etiquette is of which is a fuller and more useful per-
sound, but the instruction he provides on the spective for their focal concerns.
jargon of computer systems is of marginal rele- CHARLES D. ELDER
vance at best and is drawn out unnecessarily. University of Pennsylvania
For the uninitiated, this exercise in grammar is
likely to be largely meaningless. For the person Embattled Reason, Essays on Social Knowl-
with some computer experience, it serves no edge. By Reinhard Bendix. (New York: Ox-
real purpose. ford University Press, 1970. Pp. ix, 395.
In his chapter on simulation languages, Bar- $9.75.)
ton offers a brief but useful comparison of This is a collection of essays published over a
three simulation languages: GPSS, SIM- twenty-year period by a scholar of wide eru-
SCRIPT, and DYNAMO. Before getting to dition and profound sensitivity to our current
these comparisons, however, he leads the situation as well as our past. It is, in his words,
reader through an excessively long discussion "a piece of intellectual autobiography." Three
(replete with examples) of internal and exter- chapters deal with the "Conditions of Knowl-
nal machine languages, assembly languages, and edge," three with "Theoretical Perspective,"
user-oriented (source) languages and through and the remaining six with "Studies of Modern-
an annotated listing of several higher level lan- ization."
guages, most of which are not well known nor The volume is so rich in important argument
commonly available. and powerful propositions that it is hard to
The book is generally strong on the mechan- know where to begin. There are certain major
ics of constructing and implementing simula- themes, however, that bind the wide range of
tions but is less helpful on matters relating to subjects. The book begins with reflections upon
structural desiderata and design criteria (per- the precarious state of dispassionate inquiry in
haps understandably, since these matters are the modern University, with the major em-
heavily dependent upon the purpose for which phasis upon social inquiry. Bendix remarks
the simulation is to be used). Barton's advice again and again the paradox in our trust in
regarding programming and computer usage is reason, on the one hand, and our cultural de-
particularly well-taken, and he offers a number spair; our belief in the inquiry of the scholar
of valuable rules of thumb for constructing and our distrust of the average man's prudence
simulations. The force of his insights are some- which such inquiry often inspires. In "Social
times lost, however, amidst a plethora of irrele- Science and the Image of Man," he notes the
vant information and a tendency to belabor the applicability of Zeno's paradox to the social
obvious. Although he is emphatic in asserting scientist himself, asking how Marx's thought
that simulation should not be used when analy- could be exempt from Marx's strictures on ide-
sis will do, the force of his argument is diluted ology, or what dark complex of childhood ex-
by an unfortunate choice of a simple penny- periences lay at the roots of Freud's analysis
matching game with which to illustrate the of unreason, and thereby "explained" it.