THG RNR

COUN Ct oF
DELH

he

BG T C r
Cifoo RRY

AND

DGLRI D HINI STRA O N

A has been Gn
ompN Complaim ks b Cplauncnr
ado Ca
e pedl ant tor no
altundny (K

e te
NOTICE sar ound Delk Sunt a nh adr
Fa he ook bru fo he c a emd did nst m d F C

amd he cs u a p r o frssmal micondmt.

NoTICE The adwo c a , in kis r p l g a l l q har

RGPLY To THe
t wos d 4 s l t Ppear in t e coR on a daj--daban

CASE (-
FACTS OF THE The aPpellant aduoca Gau a brT t
Crminal ca Buk he did not alTonc the aae (n K c o u s t T e Cou

8au 3udg*men againt e pe okrch te appellant d

vakaletnama and memo cppearance. The casrtend pertan t l d

a Compla~nr agansE h ade ocas n he s/aiz Bar Coundl,

cl helhu IK appedllen adr oca did n t altord Hhe ca

(29 hedku Ke Condaet dy the crpellem addo caa Conshikul pretlome

*RGUmENTI- An argument behwen the

Complanant and he
appel lam
h a IadoCaloat br for he Co and e did ndr allend

he Ca ln Hhe Coult and hi amount pryeitíonok mfsonduet

 NCG Rore
Sas (har Ik advoea has 6
vekalahmema cak, but did nt alond tR ca ama
Cot has T * *-pr ord er. This shows thot tk adwo ca da

alemd (k case
nar

e x m N ATIONcRos - *XAT NAtiON:

The a e w o c a t , tn s p

1 eec a Les dsiCE G appear in the case on e dog-a

basis.SuE eplanekm wes ndr bvumd SeHsacor y

Court

oRDER The Be Counca sal ked hat is q u a

fo ca aemd o cae el aeceptma K br amd

hld tat e a o o ca is 2 proteon a miscandaA

 BCOo THE Bo COUNCIL

C STATG OF UTTAR PRADG S

The sph
Di3
*** _ U Ear Counua
dh Uttar Praa

B T E e N

Anear ^bbai

AND

kRISHNA *nD Ahers

Sn.

CompLANT Te Complanant Mr. Siga Auar sbos ble a

C plai Ih siai Ber coune allegng Hhat bhe respmd n

. Si KA ° n a *T" * * 9aale tabo kddiqu 2. Hade

Hab Stadq mNhanaA Nm outda He Cou for ra am

obteim

NOTI CEi OPen reeAVm Complaink,a n s r a wes s n Ehe

k cak °*
responems Ppareore D p inem CommlG vide

RepLy To THE NOTICE The espodeni rP For (K Complain

by b 3 en a daxt e k m g tha# he allcqaiums Lwere a

bal.

F*CTS OF T E CAse( he epodmt aawoca o . o Sag

ooCE Leall O adoeaE

on
ponden ro.o aai
Lad
b he
Complamant, s kich he
Complahamb roikd
ob}teim
herhe respamdent n . o had ho a h o mw uch

P P caHon, Therealjae the ComplamanE alleaad Thak, outida K cauR

D Ehe
espondnts 2, 3 men henollad hi.
gain w machong
b r Ber Associehion, hex sumendad hin amd e x h o r im
or
o h am PiR was
Lodged o coplaan
 (1) Whei
whe Ihe ha
sues
( )
pondrt adorel ne rh
T
wnant outfide e
tu r
*
JF

onaduct

E e omplaunant h produu rd H rurd dat

EvIDEN CE
idma Grma al o the pondunfi produus opt '

wkith dmtd the

all ea aiom y ha r*pr,"

NESS1 Te ripondence cduoca we huund q l d pterura

ndnet b the sar dounal d ct a.

ATION Te Complanank oppeard amd mads a

tlo
on

Complan
laint amd xd alb'elavst mabe treate4 ar ewident.
AS

eyoss excmi ncd by the Epond e t He alo r l e d pm a P

Nah ona n Pr AGh he neus o Indecent behawiour wc

pubashed The pen dunts denied he ellegehou ard bunhur

aad Ke Thar Condu does ndt ome uwdhn B amb r

adwocalm Aek, q6, heir

Secho 3S As was relahg
The
pva obairt amd ndt onneclod wah Ihir presimal d.
and tua
Bar Caun hd har
m we 9ul de mgon dut
h a al te hao manhandld he
fuly Convmud ponduna
Colaandmr
utree th our
m

The rupond emls Frund 9 and [hy uwee iwpea

ORDERI
Uo3 mon hs ard alio ma
R. 5on
T pracu kor a
penod
ecch
 THC BAR COUNCL OF THE STnTE OF
BuO
ALSm
die pmo or 15as CouNA O Assam

B6TGE

Kunar chakre borlk,

Uttom

AND

kumAR S*TRK AR
DIGP

Cmp e aPpea has lem d agasnst orderJudgenen

in De o 2 8 P a t c a by ihe Bar Counul AHam, Nagalard,

NOTICE A n o a uas serv4 by ( commNG 6 bstkk p a / t

P P e befure
The ubmta n onue
RPY TO NOTICe relz a the ndte was

form before the Driptman GomnQtn

FACTS OF THE CASE e DLaNa Comta cwar p l e a n d G inkt

a punighmant for mva name Pplcont herem from r a l

The Gounse dy aPpelan radka algal ts ercm

Corhuhin d e comn( t , a P Sckm 4 ok K AduvealAck 196.

T & mendelay for Hhe commUe Cormpre r (hre mmbur

Bu on I da honng [ thard member wes a e Bukm

day Judgenent wes hourr dalarers undor Ko *gnaie o
all the Bhr menbers.

he learnd Coun placad r a n c a an IK j u a n e n t dr E Apta a r e

in Bhe Cau , Ram h a r o r Agaruial V Horsh Suarop Mahegwar",

Cordang 5 whih uch judgemnt skands vtHala.

SEUES( () hether Ik ordr o ko s l a t (sar counul shoulo

w h a t remedr is availasle n,
EvDEN
DEN CE PTOISity t kchon 9 and also Ru
e r e
consideA a * wh K judqunumt gHorb pru
Cour
br the our Smc a hwo or he menbees out d
hara ne
Memgrebers arTUMen on h da q knal han
aumnit a dccad G oe inomplel and the aa

n n de d surad.

ess The lat da dr heame, wes londaseho t

JTNESS
nbes bench hih s ndt Com so Ct appcal ed furhe

he a
OROER Pgh orde dekA 18. a0 l4 Is se aida

nalfer le rnande lbeck G sta Ber courel s redecid

the comP Cy e omp lanant n accordanu wtK laus c

o he peta.
ham
 THE OsCIPLIN

pLINARY cornmi11El_OBnR CoUNcl ot PurAs A

HARYANa

DeeeN

Suo
M Lng

A s h O K R u m a r

The
CoMPLRTNT Complainant amd tha Responduot adoca

made
wnne ceise allchms on reaAstrar Hah caust, os*
qe and Tuakal dkbcar.
Ju

NouCE A nOnte wa gen (k repondt G disprove e

egahms mad m hin hetor (ho donplmany Commültu.

RepLy To THE OTU Ce

The
responclent n rpr Shan7 re

he allegahons mao. m hm were baulen.

FACTS O F THE CASE The p o n d mt ha ss e p cans Lefor

Ha Dtst Consuner's fonun aainst a Hon' hyh coust,

Reqrar dr Cout, D1 b Tudgs ond d r c d dtiur

alle 3an Caramcal ano inprop* behaatour thasn

y Req lrar c Hiah u t and hus Tudg

The Consume fofum said ha t F h a d n0 poue malc

Rueh Cam ploikT, then K Reepondent replea that ke hat ny

g l all cans in (K capaci r an aduoea amd Re lt noar

Cneern cd uK khe maanlan ob g and hon-mamfanbiia

hird hares and nkmidot

suE CL) whethr ku Respondat

LWhether the adwocal behawiou amaumli Lo penima

SCendut
Ascoaten haa
PeA a enuiien whsh
DENC6 The sla Ber
aes Teafed a omplaint b Ber o a b Pmma faie Case has

been 1nEialed a sO-Mo proccedsAngs

AG e n &ar counea
gain he advDa
 The
w i T N S e respendemt aduea aos
fund gua
peEimel
ms Comdu Dreplman Comm6tt-

K
miNATON OPon faet 6 heang lbstk (Ru par"
That
a n d
cenide a ridem Kram eaminahm foma
Repundem C u r preretme mis Condat
penden PP* PP B a r councl a Indsa
Kp

ORDER The Omptir Commúlu held ha the appelo**

adwos o u Proyartiomal miscon dust amd mpoed

puniseme db emova nane from Ck r a u cmd i m p o r d

fome K s : Souo
 TH Bg
FoRC Nc OF KAGNATKA

GAplnan ammu 1Bor Caunu) dy

karnoln va

eeTueN
Pankajem
Snt

shetha
C h a m d
ra

8-H.

was
d Complan ar
CormpLNT
he
complaa a

h Gar Counel karnalaka alleaT

Snr Pan koj am ut uwko ua raT
aduoca M. Bt Chamd tukhar
Res ponde ded ndt allond
fhe prececd
in ca d
ichon
tnenR cmalr
her
aecr tor wichn uas par agani
okitk eR-
por
du t

COTp l a h a n t .

the nupmdent bacd o T

A nona Os
3vam
NOTICE And I
8.
madu he omplanamt
vide Cau no:
alleaams (ko otsiplina
Comml

wes asked p e a r beore

rspon dem made m hin
alleaeins
gerdn
n a
4peAT da
aduoca 9a
a rpr
The eapondemt
NOTice! made

RepLy To THE sfahra

he aleachians
ko akbielart
the
ndtr
b Klng
wese felse and basleis

adca
a
ngad z K
TE
CASE =
The espond enf nefom, The respondont
FACTS OF
hour
can tr
a
Couna in wih
G
as
a
dus
oplanant tenHmat
h peadngp
a/Tend
aowo cao did ndt conp lanant.
wa4 pana aai
eneHon
decru for
Parc
o ga
advoca
K respendem
Whelkeu
() Caa.

uES Co
ima
rqaatd
h prrtenim
in TK inicnimag
Plnant
adwocaE
Ruponden
kelhee tk
Condnt.
nemti
Pofusl
duhe (i uy
rupendent
h
h 58
 eviD The
Te spondunt fal«d place mfoned
am do wmenlany
cdenca
dhosing Ehar he Complaman had hin (Kat th

h a s e n

din
l e a
a
PmiK agem snt in Tkechm

ESS The
oPanant has
uce«hdy Proa Co

umt b e P a a a do wnnlary har

r e p o n d e

edencu $ho*J
anplatnamt has Infom d hat has nlena in
the

mie r e n ah Ka landlord. Gve Ihen, t ias he

C a r n p r o m

F aoloca lo nfon K Cout about he Compromi

d
chall ha.ve lak
ond
Sh
dschar the ca from k
ou

R Am orde nes be pats b ( Comn TTe aaN

CRDeR
n
m a
adao
occa
all and
an upemded him Arom p r a c a tron (
respond
Commun tahrm dr the ovder.
 Mahratt. thFa and GoA *

B U

A N P

The
comPlananE lodge a onplaint alleqr**
k e dent
K e " p o n d m e
ado ca Mr: Subath Jain was
pradi an

ot well ac he we
Onm
d w o c a

Pr¬

NoticeE
A nde
a 'ESA
(R repondenb ndwota M
Joch Jain PPEa oetore he Dsuplnor; Comm c l dP****

maae on Babu la vda

eqah on t hi by Complainont M
cot o*

THC NOuCE he espondent adwoca ra p t

KComplan o ComPlanan lad K capS dy a i d a w * s a

that ( p e nd e t adoca's as edmar a ouner d

bne prers and Ih spon dnt adwocas t o e d ab@ Ik ente

acceuunt & P

as
FACTS OF THCCR
The Rpomdent aowocau is
pvae m
an calwocat a e l l as he is sarkng as an edtsr. prm and

ealled TaNaTHA", T i that

publisher week AAT KI
alleard
he ic ithe ouwnes, pubu i h s , p md tdA os (R press.
 helher
( ) Lhe lher the
he rw
podemt odwua n dd
dad ndt
no
dstlo o

d hI rarofion a an
odvu tali hal he is
wak

Lhelhe he plon w
entn een
( a )
all+r hle
req thration af

advoca,
the
h e t kea pondenE adwocat Can be
rean a
in oku butnus
perig

( helhe he Comm tta Proitiomal

mircondu.

EvIoecE
eE Smt roj Jain, ie a respondent admit ha
che becc me he
adnes, te
respondent Conhnud
Ikough as
ano
nd pube thar. The said
ueek mageame lt a iour
i shaed
P
d a mngs t
nd
ng
herd and ku rec
pond ent. he
ore oka a
a c c o u n l s

y rpondunt omd he
also rccw
emnram from the
Presa.

wTNESST h e ddocumem laewid ence was taken in Conclderahm

purpo the coplainant examncd hamcel on oalh as well os

1ed d emC Ob Kepoaim wobe asa wdneet suppost he Complaint

ADER the Dtpar ma obsered hat (k aduveatia

evell cin ( Par Counca Omd lala he stalid b e an edlr,

pner and pubishee d magsaone. I t amounh pertimal

nistondut. Re could hawe Canceh ed his iane f he wos inleresla

in olher proess ion.

He s Suspenaer rom prece or peiod n e year fom k

det on ushieh this order wes rece4 by himn

58