Professional Documents
Culture Documents
■ Like any other written Constitution in the world, the Constitution of India
also provides for its amendment in order to adjust itself according to the
changing conditions and needs.
■ Article 368 in Part XX of the Constitution deals with the powers of
Parliament to amend the Constitution and its procedure. It states that the
Parliament may amend the Constitution by way of addition, variation or
repeal of any provision in accordance with the procedure laid down for the
purpose.
■ However, the Parliament cannot amend those provisions which form the
‘basic structure’ of the Constitution. This was ruled by the Supreme Court
in the Kesavananda Bharati case (1973).
First Amendment Act, 1951
■ Reasons:
○ To remove certain practical difficulties created by the court's
decision in several cases such as the Kameshwar Singh Case,
Romesh Thapar Case, etc.
○ Issues involved in the cases included freedom of speech,
acquisition of the Zamindari land, State monopoly of trade, etc
■ Amendments:
■ Amendments:
■ Reasons:
○ To implement the recommendations of the State Reorganization
Committee and to implement the State Reorganization Act,
1956.
■ Amendments:
○ Second and Seventh Schedules were amended
○ Abolished the existing classification of states into four
categories i.e Part A, Part B, Part C, and Part D states, and
reorganized them into 14 states and 6 union territories.
○ Extended the jurisdiction of high courts to union territories.
○ Provided for the establishment of a common high court for two
or more states.
○ Provided for the appointment of additional and acting judges of
the high court.
Ninth Amendment Act, 1960
■ Reasons:
■ Amendments:
■ Amendments:
■ Amendments:
■ Amendments:
■ Amendments:
■ Amendments:
■ Amendments:
■ Amendments:
■ Reasons:
■ Amendments:
■ Amendments:
■ Reasons:
■ Amendments:
○ Amended Articles 101 and 190 and provided that the resignation
of the members of Parliament and the state legislatures may be
accepted by the Speaker/Chairman only if he is satisfied that the
resignation is voluntary or genuine
■ Amendments:
■ Amendments:
■ Amendments:
■ Reasons:
■ Amendments:
■ Amendments:
■ Amendments:
○ Restored the original term of the Lok Sabha and the state
legislative assemblies (i.e., 5 years).
○ Restored the provisions with regard to the quorum in the
Parliament and state legislatures.
○ Omitted the reference to the British House of Commons in the
provisions pertaining to the parliamentary privileges.
○ Gave constitutional protection to publication in a newspaper of
true reports of the proceedings of the Parliament and the state
legislatures.
○ Empowered the president to send back once the advice of the
cabinet for reconsideration. But, the reconsidered advice is to be
binding on the president.
○ Deleted the provision which made the satisfaction of the
president, governor, and administrators final in issuing
ordinances.
○ Restored some of the powers of the Supreme Court and high
courts.
○ Replaced the term ‘internal disturbance’ by ‘armed rebellion’ in
respect of national emergency.
○ Made the President to declare a national emergency only on
the written recommendation of the cabinet.
○ Made certain procedural safeguards with respect to a national
emergency and President’s rule.
○ Deleted the right to property from the list of Fundamental
Rights and made it only a legal right.
○ Provided that the fundamental rights guaranteed by Articles 20
and 21 cannot be suspended during a national emergency.
○ Omitted the provisions which took away the power of the court
to decide the election disputes of the president, the
vice-president, the prime minister and the Speaker of the Lok
Sabha.
■ Amendments:
○ Empowered the Parliament to restrict the Fundamental Rights of
persons employed in intelligence organizations and
telecommunication systems set up for the armed forces or
intelligence organizations.
Fifty-Second Amendment Act, 1985
■ Reasons:
■ Amendments:
■ Amendments:
○ Reduced the voting age from 21 years to 18 years for the Lok
Sabha and state legislative assembly elections.
Sixty-Fifth Amendment Act, 1990
■ Amendments:
■ Amendments:
■ Amendments:
■ Amendment:
■ Amendment:
■ Amendment:
■ Amendment:
■ Amendments:
■ Amendments:
■ Amendments:
■ Amendments:
■ Amendments:
■ Amendments:
■ Amendments:
■ Amendments:
■ Amendments:
■ Amendments:
■ Amendments:
■ Amendments:
■ Amendments:
■ Amendments:
■ Amendments:
■ Amendments:
■ Amendments:
It extends the deadline for the cessation of reservation of seats for members from
Scheduled Castes (SCs) and Scheduled Tribes (STs) in the Lok Sabha and State
Legislative Assemblies by a period of 10 years.
It removes the reserved seats for the Anglo-Indian community in the Lok Sabha
and State Legislative Assemblies.
1. The Constitution of India provides for reservation of seats for SCs and STs
in the Lok Sabha and State Legislative Assemblies for a period of 70 years
from the commencement of the Constitution. This period was due to expire
on January 25, 2020.
2. The government argued that the SCs and STs had not yet achieved
adequate representation in the government and that extending the
reservation of seats for them was necessary to ensure their social and
educational advancement.
3. The government also argued that the Anglo-Indian community had
achieved adequate representation in the government and that the reserved
seats for them were no longer necessary.
● The Act amends Article 334 of the Constitution to extend the deadline for
the cessation of reservation of seats for SCs and STs by a period of 10
years.
● It also amends Article 331 of the Constitution to remove the reserved seats
for the Anglo-Indian community.
One Hundred and Fifth Amendment Act, 2019
Reasons:
1. In 2019, the Supreme Court of India ruled in the case of Jarnail Singh vs.
Lacchmi Narain Gupta that the power to identify and notify SEBCs lies
exclusively with the central government. This ruling overturned a 2005 law that
had given State governments the power to identify and notify SEBCs.
2. The Supreme Court's ruling was met with criticism from many State
governments, which argued that it would harm the interests of SEBCs in their
States. They pointed out that the central government did not have the capacity
to understand the specific needs of SEBCs in each State.
Amendments:
● The 105th Amendment amends Article 342A of the Constitution to restore the
power of State governments to identify and notify SEBCs. It also makes it
clear that the State governments are free to use their own criteria for
identifying SEBCs.
● The amendment was passed by the Lok Sabha on August 9, 2021, and by the
Rajya Sabha on August 10, 2021. It was ratified by the required number of
state legislatures and received the President's assent on August 25, 2021.
● The 105th Amendment is a significant amendment to the Constitution of India,
as it restores the power of State governments to recognise SEBCs. This
change has important implications for the implementation of affirmative action
policies for SEBCs in India.