Page |1

NOTICE

From

Y.Bhaskar Reddy, B.A.B.L.,

M.A.Noori M.Com, L.L.B.,

Advocates, Punganur – 517247

To

1. The District Collector

Chittoor District

2. The Tahsildar (M.R.O.),

Taluk office, Punganur

3. Village Revenue Officer (V.R.O.),

Yethuru Village, Marrimakulapalli Post,

Punganur Mandal, Chittoor District.

Sir,

Under the instructions of our client Sri.A.Ramachandra Reddy S/O Late

Venkata Reddy of Nallagutlapalli (Vill), H/O Yethuru, Marrimakulapalli Post, Punganur

Mandal, Chittoor District, we issue to you the following notice U/S 80 of C.P.C.

1. That the suit schedule property originally belonged to one Chivakala Linga

Reddy S/O C.Venkatrami Reddy and his minor son C.Ashok Kumar of Nallagutlapalli

village, Yethuru group, Marrimakulapalli Post, Punganur Mandal, Chittoor District and

they are in possession and enjoyment of the same till they alienated the same to our

client.

2. On 26-09-1980 the said Chivakala Linga Reddy got sold an extent of Ac 0.90

cents in the notice schedule S.No. for a valid and proper consideration under a regd. sale

deed and got executed a regd. sale deed on dt.26-09-1980 himself and on behalf of his

then minor son and delivered possession of the same on the same day and our client took

possession of the same on the same day and continued to be in possession of the same.

Again on 04-09-1984 the said Chivakala Linga Reddy sold an extent of 0.10 cents in the

same S.No. for a valid and proper consideration to our client and got executed a regd.

sale deed dt.04-09-1984 himself and on behalf of his then minor son by name C.Ashok

Corrs: Advocate
 Page |2

Kumar and delivered the possession of the same to our client and our client took

possession of the same on the same day and continued to be in possession of the same

along with the other extent of Ac 0.90 cents. So, our client is in settled possession of the

notice schedule extent of Ac 1.00 cents total and continued to be in possession of the

same as of his own independent right by knowing entire surrounding people even till

today.

3. Since the date of purchase our client is making several representations to

No.2 and 3 of you by oral and in written by showing both the regd. sale deeds mentioned

and requested you to mutate his name in the revenue records for the notice schedule

property in his Katha No.355. But, all his sincere efforts to mutate the notice schedule

property in his Katha No.355 have become futile.

4. So, our client constrained to issue this legal notice U/S 80 of C.P.C.

requesting No.1 of you sir to direct No.2 and 3 of you to mutate the name of our client

for the notice schedule property in his Katha no.355.

5. Please therefore take this notice and our client is herewith requesting No.1 of

you sir to direct No.2 and 3 of you to mutate the name of our client in the revenue records

in his Katha No.355 after the due enquiry under the above said facts and circumstances or

else our client will be constrained to proceed in to a court of law for appropriate remedies

and you will be held responsible for all costs and damages incidental there to including

the costs of this notice.

SCHEDULE

Chittoor District - Punganur Sub-district - Punganur Mandal - Yethuru Revenue Village

S.No.262-1 Dry Ac 2.67 cents Paike Ac 1.00 cents

Punganur

Date

Advocate

Corrs: Advocate