Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Macedo Final Draft Ee This One
Macedo Final Draft Ee This One
Macedo
Valerie Macedo
PSYC 2001
23 November 2020
Most people do not remember the first thing they learned as it occurs when we are infants.
The basic act of learning is a concept that seems to come naturally to a person as they mature and
age. This is obvious in the simple act of learning how to walk and learning to speak at the early
age of one year. So, if we are already learning at such a young age, why do people need to
further “learn” how to learn? There are many different outlooks on how learning should be
approached. Some argue people should be in charge of developing their study skills, otherwise
known as, “learning to learn as they go”. This means that as one matures and goes through life
then they will develop their own skills and learn through others or one’s own mistakes. On the
opposing side is the view that children should be taught specific ways to learn and study and to
utilize these strategies throughout their life. Learning involves more processes than listening
alone. It utilizes many parts of the brain including memory. It is believed that students have
different learning styles than other students and it can be difficult to teach a method that will be
successful for everyone. However, the theory of learning styles has been proven false by
neuroscientists. It has been proven that learning happens in an interconnected way. A person uses
all their senses to process information. (Lawrence) Nonetheless, even if there is no set “learning
styles,” each person processes information differently than others and it is best if a majority of
students develop their own ways to study and learn as they tend to do better. There are many
advantages to both schools of thought, however, being taught specific strategies will result in
type of environment one is in and the information being taught. Many teachers have different
expectations, have different teaching styles, and require different learning strategies. Separate
strategies include rereading, doing practice problems, flashcards, rewriting notes, and countless
other strategies. It has been discovered that many students are unsure of how to study.
(Willingham) In fact, many students have not mastered the concept of learning by the time they
reach graduate school if they are pursuing higher learning. Most common methods, such as
reading or spending hours on one topic have been proven to ineffectively promote long-term
learning. (Winerman) Many students are taught how to learn by their own family members.
However, the methods their own family may teach have become outdated as some new skills and
techniques have been discovered to be much more effective. The skills that may have led
There is a need for change in teaching, learning, and assessment. (Lawrence) Many
students ride by in high school by simply memorizing facts and answers instead of learning how
to apply this knowledge to the real world. Often, once the students have been tested on this
information, they forget a majority of what they just spent hours cramming in to learn for an
exam. Students do not know how to learn properly. They teach themselves how to take a test and
how to pass these tests. There is not a great interest in learning the information, rather learning it
well enough to get a good grade. The motivation behind learning has been misplaced in many
students and this has caused development of very poor study habits. In order to help, teachers
should help students learn effective study strategies, especially before the students enter high
school. A good example of this is a class called ‘Study Skills’ given to eighth graders in order to
3
Macedo
prepare them for the rigor of high school and college. Teachers control the environment in
which students learn, including what they learn and how they learn.
Many strategies are being taught that are a waste of time and it is important to utilize the
strategies that could make a large difference for students across all classrooms. The most
effective include strategies that do more than aid memorization but promote application of the
knowledge and help transfer information to new situations. Andrew Butler conducted a study
that compared whether students did better on tests after restudying material or taking a practice
test to remember specific information. (Schwartz) The results revealed that those who took
practice tests were able to make inferences much better than students who simply restudied
material. Students should also be encouraged to spread out their studying and work over a longer
period of time as it has been proven to be effective than cramming material. The term “mass
practice” is less effective and results in less learning. (Schwartz) Teachers can incorporate these
very methods into the classroom very easily. The way teachers assign work is very important and
it can and will ingrain into the student’s study habits, good or bad. (Schwartz) This can be done
by introducing “low-risk” quizzes that are more for the student's benefit than the grade book.
For some reason, many students will rely on methods that worked extremely well in
grade school, worked mediocre in high school, and are surprised when they are not sufficient
methods in university. These students accumulate stress and frustration as they see themselves
pour hours into studying and the outcome reflects poorly. These are prime examples of
study/learning methods that many students take years to discover. It may take them until their
undergraduate education to finally learn the effective ways to grasp the material. By
incorporating methods that have been proven to enhance learning in grade school students will
be able to grasp material quicker. (Broyde)Teachers should emphasize which strategies will
4
Macedo
ensure maximum retention and application and incorporate assignments that further develop
these study strategies to ensure students can see the outcomes. Instead of arriving at university
and discovering they have been learning “wrong.” This normally occurs after failing the first test
in courses and results in a stressful semester. Nonetheless, there are benefits to allowing the
While there are many benefits to teaching students certain strategies that are known to
work and many students thrive on, there is the possibility that these methods may not be the best
for certain students. The act of learning relies on the person and their desire to learn. It is not
something that can be applied to everyone as a sort of blanket. There is a common saying that if
you can master a subject on your own then you learn more. Many skills need to be acquired
much earlier than other skills—such as reading, writing, and thinking in one’s own language—
and learning these skills will lead to the development of good study habits. (Robinson) These are
developed at one’s own pace. What contributes the most to an effective self-learner is a good
environment. This will allow the student to focus solely on the task that is being presented to
them and will develop critical thinking skills in order to solve their problem. This is made
evident when homeschoolers begin to progress intro to higher levels of math and science. Many
of these students use Saxon which is a Math curriculum that teaches new concepts while
reviewing past taught concepts. Each homework assignment includes problems to work from the
new concept as well as increasingly more difficult problems from all past sections. These
specific books were written so that it can be mastered by students on their own without any
outside help. (Robinson) It is generally a much more gradual learning process than if in a normal
classroom setting with normal teaching methods, but the end product is a deeper understanding
of the learned concepts. The student who masters it themselves develops the ability to teach
5
Macedo
themselves and continues to take this skill with them into science and other subjects. This student
has developed this ability regardless of whether or not a teacher with prior knowledge of the
subject is present to explain the concepts. Once the student has mastered the ability to self-teach,
they begin to master their own study habits and thinking abilities that lead to a very successful
academic career.
Children who learn to self-teach and develop their own study habits achieve far more and
skip over one or more years of college, through Advanced Placement examinations. By allowing
children to “teach themselves” in the classroom setting you are allowing them to develop their
own learning strategies that work the best for them and at their own pace. This method requires
time, patience, and dedication which are all things that many schools are unable to give at the
amount needed to fully utilize this method of learning. The most mundane term that can be said
is that “different people learn information in different ways.” (Pashler 2) So, giving students the
opportunity to develop their own study strategies can ensure that what they develop will work for
them and enables a drive to learn. It is commonly thought that if the instruction to a student is
tailored to their individual learning style then the student’s potential to learn effectively is raised
There are clear advantages to both methods of learning, and it is difficult to decipher
which method would result in a higher percentage of students with successful learning strategies
that are carried into adulthood and into their careers. However, the most adaptable and successful
students will be the students who are taught explicit learning strategies early on and further
develop these skills as they mature and encounter harder material. Children who attend school
and experience classroom settings where teachers talk to the children demonstrated “superiority
in basic memory and cognitive skills.” (Ornstein) Memory is very important when it comes to
6
Macedo
learning new material. The better one’s memory is the more likely they are to absorb the
information and they will be able to build on that foundation. The development of mnemonic
techniques is very important and normally occurs in the classroom setting during grade school.
(Orstein) The reason this method of teaching will yield better results than allowing students to
fend for themselves is because it offers a solution to something many students believe there is
none. The learning as you go method is the method most commonly being used. Teachers in
grade school believe that children are too young to be taught methods on how to study and
simply allow students to develop their own skills. For a select portion of students, this method
works as they are able to reason and figure out a successful way to study and learn. Other
students struggle and expect some type of clarification in high school. However, a majority of
high school teachers expect students to have already developed their own learning style and
expect students to adjust themselves to their teaching style. This is detrimental to many students
which is reflected in low grades and dropout rates. Reading has been proven to be of the utmost
importance in academic settings and is one of the most common study strategies taught to
students. However, reading is the bare minimum that students take from this method. To enhance
reading and learning students should be marking their texts as they read. This method has been
proven to promote the retention of information that is read and needs to be retained. Along with
marking texts students should also be taking notes that teachers say in class. This holds appeal
Explicit methods should be taught at an early stage and then continued to be refreshed
each year as one matures. The student will be able to learn about each method and when to use
7
Macedo
them as some would work best for science and others would work best for humanities. Teachers
would also provide assignments where these methods would need to be utilized to ensure
everyone is attempting to learn to learn. The reason leaving everyone on their own to learn to
learn would not work is it allows students to “survive.” When a child is under stress they
become, “apprehensive and they don’t learn.” (Ornstein) This would occur naturally when one
comes across material that is difficult to learn and instead of sitting and attempting to figure a
solution out, as the method of teaching yourself suggests, the student will most likely give up and
perform poorly on the exam on the material. This becomes detrimental when it is a fundamental
concept that is continued to be built upon and the student has no clue on how to approach the
problem. However, if the student had been taught multiple strategies then they could think to
themselves\ how do I approach to learn this and what can I do to succeed. This is what a teacher
can hope for once the strategies are taught. To go one step further would be to “make sure the
students understand why the strategies fit how the brain learns and emphasizing that students can
Now, as both methods have been discussed and analyzed there is much to ponder. The
advantages of teaching explicit strategies are much higher than leaving students on their own and
expecting the best results. The interest to apply results from cognitive science to enhance
educational practices is growing. (Miyatsu) With this interest comes the need to make changes
based on findings. These changes can include placing higher importance on teachers to take the
time to go over learning strategies to succeed in schooling. These same strategies, if embedded
into their habits, will be carried into their careers and result in a higher success rate . Individual
8
Macedo
differences may change the success of learning strategies for individuals, but it does not affect
the overall rate of success that has been proven. Psychologists hope that students use the
strategies that are suggested to help them study more effectively and that teachers become aware
of the impact they may have on students learning abilities and offer guidance.
9
Macedo
Works Cited
Broyde , Michael J, and Ira Bedzow. “Why We Should Teach Legal-Reasoning Skills to
Students.” Education Week, 18 Nov. 2019, www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2019/06/18/why-
we-should-teach-legal-reasoning-skills-to.html.
Lawrence, Breanna C, et al. “It Is Complicated: Learning and Teaching Is Not About ‘Learning
Styles.’” Frontiers for Young Minds, 2020,
kids.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/frym.2020.00110.
Miyatsu, Toshiya, Khuyen Nguyen, and Mark A. McDaniel. "Five popular study strategies:
Their pitfalls and optimal implementations." Perspectives on Psychological Science 13.3
(2018): 390-407.
Ornstein, Peter A., and Jennifer L. Coffman. "Toward an Understanding of the Development of
Skilled Remembering: The Role of Teachers’ Instructional Language." Current
Directions in Psychological Science 29.5 (2020): 445-452.
Pashler, Harold, et al. "Learning styles: Concepts and evidence." Psychological science in the
public interest 9.3 (2008): 105-119.
Robinson, Arthur. “Teach Them to Teach Themselves.” Robinson Curriculum, 20 Jan. 2012,
www.robinsoncurriculum.com/rc/teach-them-to-teach-themselves/.
Schwartz, Katrina. “Why Teachers Should Help Students Learn Effective Study Strategies.”
KQED, 21 May 2017, www.kqed.org/mindshift/48139/why-teachers-should-help-students-
learn-effective-study-strategies.