Professional Documents
Culture Documents
“Your wealth is in many ways dependent on what other people will pay for your assets.”
-Peter Bernstein
Context
What an asset is worth depends on who wants to buy it.
As no one would like to pay for an asset more than its value, it is inevitable to do a valuation of the asset
to know its real worth. Knowledge of value of an asset is an indispensable requirement prior to any
investment or financing decision. That is perhaps the reason for recent growth of valuation practices
among finance professionals. Understanding the mechanism of valuation in different scenarios is a sine
qua non for all finance professionals. This article is an attempt to explain at a basic level, the methodology
of valuation to comply with the requirements of the Companies Act, 2013 and Income Tax Act,1961 .
Concepts
The concepts of ‘value’, ‘valuation’ and ‘valuer’ in the context of a financial asset such as shares or
securities of a company, can be appreciated with the help of the following definitions.
Section 247 of the Companies Act,2013 requires that, where a valuation is required to be made in respect
of any property, stocks, shares, debentures, securities or goodwill or any other assets or net
worth of a company or its liabilities under the provision of this Act, it shall be valued by a person having
such qualifications and experience and registered as a valuer in such manner, on such terms and
conditions as may be prescribed and appointed by the audit committee or in its absence by the Board of
Directors of that company.
The valuer shall while conducting a valuation, comply with the valuation standards. In this context,
Valuation Standards as of now means;
a) internationally accepted valuation standards;
b) valuation standards adopted by any registered valuer’s organisation.
Bases of Value
A registered valuer in his report describes the fundamental premises on which the reported values are
based. It is critical that the basis (or bases) of value be appropriate to the terms and purpose of the
valuation assignment, as a basis of value may influence or dictate a valuer’s selection of methods, inputs
and assumptions, and the ultimate opinion of value. A valuer may be required to use bases of value that
are defined by statute, regulation, private contract or other documents. Such bases have to be interpreted
and applied accordingly.
Valuation Approach
Valuation approach refers to a way of estimating value that employs one or more specific valuation
methods. Consideration must be given to the relevant and appropriate valuation approaches. One or
more valuation
approaches may be
used in order to arrive at
the value in accordance
with the basis of value.
The three approaches
described and defined
below are the main
approaches used in
valuation. They are all
based on the economic
principles of price
equilibrium, anticipation
of benefits or
substitution.
The principal valuation approaches are:
a) Market approach.
Market approach is a valuation approach that uses prices and other relevant information generated
by market transactions involving identical or comparable (i.e., similar) assets, liabilities or a group of
assets and liabilities, such as a business.
b) Income approach
Income approach is the valuation approach that converts maintainable or future amounts (e.g., cash
flows or income and expenses) to a single current (i.e., discounted or capitalised) amount. The fair
value measurement is determined on the basis of the value indicated by current market expectations
about those future amounts.
c) Cost approach
Cost approach is a valuation approach that reflects the amount that would be required currently to
replace the service capacity of an asset (often referred to as current replacement cost).
Valuation Method
Within valuation approaches, a specific way to estimate a value is referred to as a Method of Valuation.
As per ‘ICAI Valuation Standard 303 - Financial Instruments’, in selection of the approach and method,
a valuer shall also give due consideration to the control environment under which the entity and the
instrument operates. The control environment consist the entity’s internal governance and control
objectives, procedures and their operating effectiveness with the objective of enhancing the reliance on
the valuation process and outcome thereof. A valuer, if relying on valuation inputs provided by the entity,
shall form independent opinion on the valuation control environment and factor outcome on the valuation
method, approach, outcome and reporting thereof.
A registered valuer appreciates the bases of value and valuation premises and selects a valuation
method within an appropriate valuation approach. The value arrived at may be different under different
approaches and methods.
Use of Valuation Techniques
A valuer shall use valuation techniques that are appropriate in the circumstances and for which sufficient
data is available to measure the value, maximising the use of relevant observable inputs and accordingly
minimising the use of unobservable inputs.
The value is thus arrived at by application of valuation techniques and methods within valuation
approach(s) in a specific valuation premises.
ii. if such quoted shares and securities are received by way of transaction carried out other than
through any recognized stock exchange, the fair market value of such shares and securities
shall be, —
a) the lowest price of such shares and securities quoted on any recognized
stock exchange on the valuation date, and
b) the lowest price of such shares and securities on any recognized stock
exchange on a date immediately preceding the valuation date when such
shares and securities were traded on such stock exchange, in cases where
on the valuation date there is no trading in such shares and securities on any
recognized stock exchange;
Option #1
(a) the fair market value of unquoted equity shares = { (A–L) / PE} × (PV),
where,
A = book value of the assets in the balance-sheet as reduced by any amount of tax paid as deduction
or collection at source or as advance tax payment as reduced by the amount of tax claimed as refund
under the Income-tax Act and any amount shown in the balance-sheet as asset including the unamortised
amount of deferred expenditure which does not represent the value of any asset;
L=book value of liabilities shown in the balance-sheet, but not including the following amounts, namely:
i. the paid-up capital in respect of equity shares;
ii. the amount set apart for payment of dividends on preference shares and equity shares where
such dividends have not been declared before the date of transfer at a general body meeting of
the company;
iii. reserves and surplus, by whatever name called, even if the resulting figure is negative, other
than those set apart towards depreciation;
iv. any amount representing provision for taxation, other than amount of tax paid as deduction or
collection at source or as advance tax payment as reduced by the amount of tax claimed as
refund under the Income-tax Act, to the extent of the excess over the tax payable with reference
to the book profits in accordance with the law applicable thereto;
v. any amount representing provisions made for meeting liabilities, other than ascertained liabilities;
vi. any amount representing contingent liabilities other than arrears of dividends payable in respect
of cumulative preference shares;
Fair Market Value for share other than quoted share for Section 50CA
As per Sec 50CA of Income Tax Act, 1961, where the consideration received or accruing as a result of
the transfer by an assessee of a capital asset, being share of a company other than a quoted share, is
less than the fair market value of such share determined in such manner as may be prescribed , the value
so determined shall, for the purposes of section 48, be deemed to be the full value of consideration
received or accruing as a result of such transfer:
Rule 11UAA. Of Income Tax Rules, 1962 explains that, for the purposes of section 50CA, the fair market
value of the share of a company other than a quoted share, shall be determined in the manner provided
in sub-clause (b) or sub-clause (c),as the case may be, of clause (c) of sub-rule (1) of rule 11UA .
This clause (b) and (c) are already discussed in this article under the headings ‘Unquoted Equity
Shares’ and ‘ Unquoted Shares other than Equity’.
Conclusion
The methodology of valuation suggested under the Companies Act, 2013 are very different from the
methodology of valuation suggested under the Income Tax Act,1961 and Income Tax Rules,1962. This
obviously may lead to two different values even if valuation is conducted by one and the same valuer. A
valuation practitioner is expected to have complete knowledge of the provisions of relevant Acts, Rules
made thereunder and the Valuation Standards. As companies are now required to comply with valuation
requirements almost on an ongoing basis, the practitioners are expected to be updated at all times.
***