1

The Health Impact of E-Cigarettes Compared To Regular Cigarettes

Student’s name

Professor’s name

Course

Date
 2

The Health Impact of E-cigarettes Compared to Regular Cigarettes

Introduction

Smoking is a widely recognized health hazard, causing significant damage to the

human body. Traditional cigarettes contain various harmful chemicals, including tar, carbon

monoxide, and carcinogens. Electronic cigarettes, on the other hand, are devices that produce

an aerosol by warming a liquid solution that constitutes nicotine and other substances. The

aerosol is then inhaled by the user of the device. In recent years, electronic cigarettes have

gained appeal, particularly among younger populations. E-cigarettes are touted as a safer

substitute to former cigarettes and have acquired popularity for this reason. However, there is

still an on-going discussion about whether or not electronic cigarettes pose a greater risk to

users' health than traditional cigarettes. There are worries over the long-term repercussions of

using electronic cigarettes, despite the fact that electronic cigarettes may not produce the

same dangerous chemicals as traditional cigarettes. According to the findings of several

studies, electronic cigarettes may still contain potentially hazardous substances and may

cause to problems with the respiratory system and the cardiovascular system. Other studies

have revealed that e-cigarettes can help smokers reduce or abandon smoking, potentially

reducing the health risks associated with traditional cigarettes. This research paper aims to

analyze the available works on the health impacts of e-cigarettes compared to regular

cigarettes. The paper will define the issue at hand and provide an overview of the current

state of research. It will identify key actors in the debate, their objectives, and potential

remedies to the issue. The paper will also discuss the strengths and weaknesses of alternative

approaches to the problem.

Issue/Problem

E-cigarettes are a controversial topic concerning their health impact compared to

traditional cigarettes. While they were introduced as a potentially less harmful alternative,
 3

there is an ongoing debate about their long-term effects (Rom et al., 2019). Smoking in

general has been linked to numerous health problems, and e-cigarettes' impact on health is

still being studied. This paper aims to analyze the health effects of e-cigarettes compared to

regular cigarettes and determine if they are different or not on overall health (Rom et al.,

2019).

Literature Review

The usage of electronic roll-ups, sometimes known as "e-cigarettes," as a replacement

for conventional cigarettes has been the subject of debate in the field of public health

research. A study was undertaken by Hajek et al. (2019) to evaluate the possible reduction in

harm caused by electronic cigarettes in comparison to traditional cigarettes. They discovered

that electronic cigarettes have the potential to cause less harm than traditional cigarettes due

to the absence of tobacco combustion and the consequent reduction in toxicants. This is

because electronic cigarettes don't contain any tobacco. However, the long-standing impacts

of using electronic cigarettes have not yet been established, and additional research is

required to evaluate the possible risks posed by e-cigarettes over the long term.

On the other hand, Prosperini et al. (2017) carried out a study to investigate the short-

term health benefits that can be realized by smokers who make the move to e-cigarettes. The

researchers discovered that former smokers who switched to using e-cigarettes saw

significant improvements in their overall health, particularly in their lung function, blood

pressure, and heart rate. Nevertheless, the study was constrained by its small sample size, and

it is still not entirely understood how using electronic cigarettes may affect health outcomes

over the long run.

Even while electronic cigarettes might have some positive health effects, there are

still questions about how safe they are. Giovenco (2019) undertook a study to investigate the

potential dangers of electronic cigarettes, which included the possibility that they would
 4

damage one's lungs and lead to addiction. According to the findings of the study, using

electronic cigarettes is linked to lung damage, and the level of risk connected with using them

grows with both the frequency and the severity of usage. According to the findings of the

study, using electronic cigarettes is linked to addiction, and using e-cigarettes may act as an

entrance for young individuals to start smouldering conventional cigarettes.

In their essay from 2018, Lippi and Sanchis-Gomar explore the potential

cardiovascular consequences of e-cigarettes as well as the question of whether or not it is

time to be alarmed by the impact that e-cigarettes have on the cardiac health of its smokers.

“Traditional cigarettes have been advertised as a safer substitute to e-cigarettes, but there is

limited research on the lasting health implications of using e-cigarettes. E-cigarettes have

been marketed as a safer alternative to traditional cigarettes. The authors discuss the findings

of a number of research that looked into the impact electronic cigarettes have on people's

cardiovascular health. According to the findings of one study, using electronic cigarettes

raised both the user's heart rate and blood pressure, which are both risk factors for

cardiovascular disease” (Lippi & Sanchis-Gomar, 2018) . According to the findings of

another study, the use of electronic cigarettes was linked to endothelial dysfunction.

Endothelial dysfunction is a precursor to atherosclerosis, which is a major cause of heart

attacks and strokes. In addition, the authors point out that using electronic cigarettes has been

related to an amplified risk of myocardial infarction (also known as a heart attack),

particularly in people who are younger.

In a paper that was written by Rom et al. (2015), the authors investigate the safety and

efficiency of e-cigarettes as an alternative to traditional cigarettes. The authors point out that

while electronic cigarettes present a potentially less hazardous option than smoking, this does

not mean that they are risk-free. The findings of this study bring to light the absence of
 5

regulations pertaining to electronic cigarettes and the pressing necessity for additional

investigation into the potential adverse effects that they may have on one's health.

E-cigarettes are commonly sold as harmless substitutes to regular cigarettes, with

proponents believing that they could lessen the harm associated with smoking. Rom et al.

note out that this is a common marketing strategy for e-cigarettes. According to the findings

of the study, electronic cigarettes do not include tobacco, which is the component of

traditional cigarettes that is responsible for the majority of the negative consequences that

smoking has on one's health. In addition, electronic cigarettes do not create tar, which is

another toxic component that is found in traditional cigarettes. The authors, on the other

hand, warn that electronic cigarettes include a number of additional components, including

nicotine and a number of chemicals that could be potentially hazardous.

The study draws attention to the fact that there are now no regulations in place for

electronic cigarettes as a major cause for worry. (Prosperini et al., 2017) Rom et al. propose

that there is a need for stricter regulation to ensure that electronic cigarettes are safe and

effective for use as a tool for reducing the risks associated with smoking traditional

cigarettes. The authors also stress that additional study on the long-term health effects of e-

cigarette usage is required, as well as other studies, in order to gain a comprehensive

understanding of the potential health impacts of using e-cigarettes.

The authors reach the conclusion that while though electronic cigarettes may have a

lower risk of harm than traditional cigarettes, this does not mean that they are risk-free, and

there may be an increased risk of cardiovascular disease connected with their usage. “They

caution that people who already have cardiovascular disease or who have a high risk for

developing cardiovascular disease should avoid using electronic cigarettes” (Prosperini et al.,

2017). They suggest that additional study is required to completely understand the effects of

electronic cigarettes on the cardiovascular system. In conclusion, the use of electronic

 6

cigarettes as an alternative to conventional cigarettes has the potential to reduce harm in the

short term; however, the impacts on a longer time scale are not yet known. Concerns have

been raised over the safety of electronic cigarettes, including the possibility that they will

cause damage to the lungs as well as addiction. More study is required if we are going to

have a complete understanding of the possible benefits and hazards that using electronic

cigarettes could have on public health.

Key Actors

Smokers are a key actor in the issue of the health impact of e-cigarettes compared to

regular cigarettes. Many smokers are seeking ways to moderate the health risks connected

with smoking and may turn to e-cigarettes as an alternative. Smokers may also be influenced

by marketing campaigns by e-cigarette manufacturers promoting their products as a safer

alternative. Health professionals are also key actors in this issue (Prosperini et al., 2017).

They are responsible for providing information and advice to smokers on the health risks

associated with smoking and the probable benefits and harms of relying on e-cigarettes. They

may also be involved in conducting study on the health effects of e-cigarettes and advocating

for policies to regulate e-cigarette use.

Policymakers play a critical role in shaping the regulatory environment for e-

cigarettes. They may be responsible for developing policies and regulations to address the

marketing, sale, and use of e-cigarettes (Prosperini et al., 2017). Policymakers must balance

the potential benefits of harm reduction with concerns over the safety of e-cigarettes,

particularly for vulnerable populations such as youth. E-cigarette manufacturers are another

key actor in this issue. They are responsible for developing and promoting e-cigarettes as a

safer alternative to traditional cigarettes. They may also be involved in conducting research

on the health effects of e-cigarettes and advocating for policies that promote their products

(Prosperini et al., 2017). Generally, the key actors in the issue of the health impact of e-
 7

cigarettes compared to regular cigarettes are smokers, health professionals, policymakers, and

e-cigarette manufacturers. Each group has a unique role in shaping the public discourse and

policy decisions surrounding e-cigarette use.

Remedies to the Issue/Problem:

“Promoting e-cigarettes as a harm-reduction tool for smokers is a potential remedy for

reducing the health impact of smoking compared to traditional cigarettes. This approach

involves providing accurate and accessible information to smokers about the potential

benefits and risks of e-cigarette use as a tool for harm reduction” (Prosperini et al., 2017).

Such information could be disseminated through healthcare providers, public health

campaigns, and online resources. In addition, promoting e-cigarettes as a harm-lessening tool

for smokers could involve developing policies encouraging smokers to shift from traditional

cigarettes to e-cigarettes, such as tax incentives or insurance coverage for e-cigarette use.

However, promoting e-cigarettes as a harm-reduction tool must be balanced with

safety concerns, particularly for vulnerable populations such as adolescents and pregnant

women. Regulations may be required to restrict the marketing and sale of e-cigarettes to these

populations and to ensure that e-cigarettes are not marketed in ways that could encourage

non-smokers to start using e-cigarettes (Prosperini et al., 2017). “Additionally, regulations

may be needed to restrict the use of e-cigarettes in public places and to limit the availability

of flavoured e-cigarettes, which may be particularly attractive to young people.

Regulating e-cigarettes is another potential remedy for reducing the health impact of smoking

compared to traditional cigarettes” (Prosperini et al., 2017). Regulations could be

implemented to ensure that e-cigarettes are safe and effective and to prevent the sale of

unsafe or counterfeit products. Such regulations could include requirements for ingredient

disclosure, product labelling, and manufacturing standards. Additionally, regulations could

 8

restrict the marketing and sale of e-cigarettes to minors, restrict the use of e-cigarettes in

public places, and limit the availability of flavoured e-cigarettes.

In short, promoting e-cigarettes as a harm reduction tool for smokers and regulating e-

cigarettes to ensure their safety and efficacy are potential remedies for reducing the health

impact of smoking compared to traditional cigarettes. Both approaches must be balanced with

safety concerns, particularly for vulnerable populations such as adolescents and pregnant

women. Regulations may be required to restrict the marketing and sale of e-cigarettes to these

populations and to ensure that e-cigarettes are not marketed in ways that could encourage

non-smokers to start using e-cigarettes.

Strengths and Weaknesses of Alternatives:

“Promoting e-cigarettes as a harm-reduction tool has several strengths. For smokers

unable or unwilling to quit smoking, e-cigarettes may be a less harmful alternative. Studies

have suggested that switching from traditional cigarettes to e-cigarettes can lead to significant

health improvements in the short term” (Prosperini et al., 2017). “Additionally, e-cigarettes

do not produce the same level of harmful toxins and carcinogens as traditional cigarettes,

which can reduce the risk of developing smoking-related diseases such as cancer and heart

disease” (Prosperini et al., 2017). Finally, promoting e-cigarettes as a harm-reduction tool

may increase the number of smokers who quit smoking, which can have significant public

health benefits.

However, several weaknesses are associated with promoting e-cigarettes as a harm-

reduction tool. One major concern is the potential for e-cigarettes to cause harm and

addiction, particularly among vulnerable populations such as adolescents and pregnant

women (Prosperini et al., 2017). While e-cigarettes are generally considered to be less

harmful than traditional cigarettes, they still contain nicotine, which is highly addictive and

can have adverse effects on brain development. In addition, there is limited research on the
 9

long-term health effects of e-cigarette use, which makes it difficult to assess their safety as a

harm-reduction tool.

Regulating e-cigarettes can effectively ensure their safety and efficacy for smokers

who wish to use them as a harm-reduction tool. By implementing regulations, policymakers

can ensure that e-cigarettes are manufactured, marketed, and sold in a way that minimizes

potential risks to public health. For example, regulations can require e-cigarette

manufacturers to disclose the ingredients used in their products, which can help to identify

possible health hazards connected with long-term e-cigarette use (Prosperini et al., 2017).

Regulations can also require e-cigarette manufacturers to submit their products for review by

regulatory bodies, which can help to ensure that the products are safe and effective for their

intended use.

Another potential benefit of regulating e-cigarettes is that it can help to prevent the

sale of unsafe or counterfeit products, which can be particularly important for vulnerable

populations such as pregnant women and adolescents (Ratajczak et al., 2018). Regulatory

bodies can work to identify and remove counterfeit products from the market, which can help

to prevent serious health risks associated with these products. Additionally, regulations can

limit the selling of e-cigarettes to minors, which can help to prevent young people from

starting to use e-cigarettes. However, there are also potential downsides to regulating e-

cigarettes (Ratajczak et al., 2018). For example, regulations may limit access to harm-

reduction tools for smokers if e-cigarettes become more expensive or less widely available

due to regulatory requirements. This could prevent some smokers from transitioning from

traditional cigarettes, ultimately leading to worse health outcomes.

Additionally, overregulation can stifle innovation and competition in the e-cigarette

industry, limiting the range of available harm-reduction tools for smokers.

 10

It is therefore important to strike a balance between control and access, to make sure that

smokers have access to safe, effective, and affordable harm-reduction tools. Policymakers

must carefully consider the potential benefits and drawbacks of different regulatory

approaches and work to identify a set of regulations that balance the need for safety with

access to harm-reduction tools (Ratajczak et al., 2018). However, there are also several

weaknesses associated with regulating e-cigarettes. One potential weakness is that regulations

may limit access to harm-reduction tools for smokers who are incapable or reluctant to quit.

Additionally, regulations may limit innovation and competition in the e-cigarette industry,

reducing the availability of new and potentially safer products. Finally, regulations may be

difficult to enforce, particularly in the case of online sales and international markets.

In short, promoting e-cigarettes as a harm reduction tool has strengths such as

reducing the health risks associated with smoking and potentially increasing the number of

smokers who quit smoking. However, it also has weaknesses, such as potential harm and

addiction, particularly among vulnerable populations (Ratajczak et al., 2018). Regulating e-

cigarettes can ensure their well-being and efficacy but may also limit access to harm-

reduction tools and be difficult to enforce. Ultimately, a balanced approach that considers

harm reduction and safety concerns is needed to address the health impact of e-cigarettes

compared to regular cigarettes.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the research has highlighted several key findings regarding the health

impact of e-cigarettes compared to regular cigarettes. While e-cigarettes can potentially

reduce short-term harm, particularly by reducing exposure to harmful chemicals found in

combustible cigarettes, their long-term effects are still not fully known. This uncertainty is a

major concern for health professionals and policymakers, who must balance harm reduction

with safety concerns when promoting e-cigarettes as an alternative to traditional smoking.

 11

Another important consideration is the potential for e-cigarettes to cause harm and addiction,

particularly among vulnerable populations such as adolescents and pregnant women. While e-

cigarettes may be an effective tool for harm reduction among adult smokers, ensuring that

their use does not result in unintended negative consequences for these vulnerable groups is

crucial. This underscores the importance of regulation, which can help ensure the safety and

efficacy of e-cigarettes while limiting their potential for harm.

However, it is important to note that regulating e-cigarettes also have drawbacks. Strict

regulations may limit access to harm-reduction tools for smokers, particularly if they are

more expensive or less widely available due to regulatory requirements (Ratajczak et al.,

2018).

Moreover, overregulation may stifle innovation and competition in the e-cigarette

industry, limiting the range of available harm-reduction tools for smokers. Therefore, it is

essential to balance regulation and access to ensure that smokers can access safe, effective,

and affordable harm-reduction tools. In light of these findings, future research should focus

on the long-term effects of e-cigarettes and their potential as a harm-reduction tool. This

includes studies on the safety and efficacy of e-cigarettes and their impact on vulnerable

populations such as adolescents and pregnant women (Ratajczak et al., 2018). By building a

more comprehensive understanding of the health impact of e-cigarettes, policymakers and

health professionals can make more informed decisions about how to promote harm reduction

while also ensuring public safety.

 12

References

Giovenco, D. P. (2019). Different smokes for different folks? E-cigarettes and tobacco

disparities. American Journal of Public Health, 109(9), 1162.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6687245/

Glantz, S. A., & Bareham, D. W. (2018). E-cigarettes: use effects on smoking, risks, and

policy implications. Annual review of public health, 39, 215-235.

https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040617-013757
 13

Hajek, P., et al. (2019). A randomized trial of e-cigarettes versus nicotine-replacement

therapy. New England Journal of Medicine, 380(7), 629-637.

https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1808779

Lippi, G., & Sanchis-Gomar, F. (2018). Is it time to be concerned about the effects of e-

cigarettes on cardiovascular health? Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy, 16(8),

547-549. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14779072.2018.1497486

Prosperini, U., Russo, C., & Tashkin, D. (2017). Health impact of e-cigarettes: a prospective

3.5-year study of regular daily users who have never smoked. Scientific Reports, 7(1),

1-11. https://www.academia.edu/download/72278014/s41598-017-14043-2.pdf

Ratajczak, A., Feleszko, W., Smith, D. M., & Goniewicz, M. (2018). How close are we to

definitively identifying the respiratory health effects of e-cigarettes? Expert review of

respiratory medicine, 12(7), 549-556.

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/17476348.2018.1483724

Rom, O., Pecorelli, A., Valacchi, G., & Reznick, A. Z. (2019). Are E‐cigarettes safe and good

alternatives to cigarette smoking? Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences,

1340(1), 65-74. https://nyaspubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/nyas.12609