Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Some appropriate Business Management tools and theories for the IA are outlined on this webpage. Tools and
theories for the IA can come from the Business Management Toolkit (BMT) as well as any other part of the DP
Business Management syllabus.
There is a total of (at least) 40 tools and theories that students can choose from to address the demands of their
specific research question - these are all outlined in the sections below. Click on the hyperlink to these tools and
theories on the InThinking website.
Please note this is not a definitive or prescriptive list, but can be used to give students some ideas regarding the
tools, theories, and techniques they might be able to use (if specifically relevant to their research question).
A good starting point for selecting the most relevant tools and theories is the Business Management Toolkit (BMT).
This is a set of interrelated tools and techniques that can be used by students in different disciplinary and
interdisciplinary contexts across the contents of the new syllabus, including the Business Management IA.
Students can refer to the table below to make gain an overview of the tools in the BMT and make an initial decision
about the suitability of these tools for their specific research questions (RQ) for the IA. Click the hyperlink to access
the relevant resources for each of these tools.
Top tip 1!
Unless absolutely needed (i.e., it adds value to the business research project), conducting a SWOT analysis is
probably best avoided in the IA. SWOT analyses are often used poorly by students to address their research
question. Quite often, SWOT analyses simply represent the personal opinions of the candidate without adequate
data or evidence. In addition, there is often a lack of proper citation and referencing (C&R) of a SWOT analysis
in the business research project.
Top tip 2!
It is not always a straightforward task to classify factors into a STEEPLE analysis framework. For example,
changes in an economy's tax system or interest rates may be considered a political, legal, or economic factor.
This is rather immaterial, so long as you can justify the reasoning.
For the IA, it is vital that you cite and reference your sources - this applies to all the points in a SWOT analysis or
STEEPLE analysis (if used).
Finally, remember that any actual analysis is considered as part of the word count, and must not be placed in the
appendices of the IA. Note that if it is not permissable for candidates to include a full STEEPLE or SWOT
analysis in the appendices and expect the moderator to read this. It is, however, acceptable if the relevant parts
of the STEEPLE or SWOT analysis are extracted and used in the written commentary itself.
In all cases, the items placed in the appendices are not read per se and cannot be used to circumvent the word
count limit.
Common mistake
Too often, HL students use force field analysis incorrectly in their Internal Assessment. Many students use
this situational and decision-making tool to list the advantages and disadvantages of a certain project or strategic
choice, and then proceed to personally assign the statistical weights to the driving and restraining forces in the
analysis. The weights in a force field analysis are frequently unsubstantiated or even missing.
The tool requires the weights to come from the perspective of the organization being investigated, not from the
perspective of the student (especially when there are no explanations or justifications provided for the allocation
of these statistical weights).
In addition to the tools and theories in the Business Management Toolkit (BMT), other tools and theories from the
syllabus that may be relevant to the Internal Assessment include the following (not an exhaustive list):
3.5 - Ratio analysis Liquidity ratio analysis is a financial tool used to measure a
8. (profitability and liquidity firm's ability to meet its short-term obligations. This is done
ratio analysis) by calculating its ability to convert assets into cash.
Whichever tools or theories are used in the IA (and these do not have to be only those listed above), you must
ensure that these are applied to the context of the business organization selected for the IA and that they are
used to help answer the research question.
For example, far too many students use SWOT and PEST (STEEPLE) analysis in the IA without real purpose or
value. These tools are rarely used effectively to answer the research question in the IA. So, unless the tools and
theories are directly relevant and add value to the IA, you should avoid using them in the IA.
Simply referring to or using terminology, tools, theories, and techniques does not justify the full 4 marks for
Assessment Criterion C (Selection and application of tools and theories). Instead, it is about how the appropriate
terminology, tools, theories, and techniques are applied competently and effectively to the research question.
As always, what is appropriate for a particular IA really depends on the research question. It’s like saying, I have
a hammer and spanner - can I use them? Not if you’re trying to change a lightbulb! Students must be advised to
use the most appropriate tools and theories that address the specific issue being investigated.
Top Tip 2!
Many teachers and students often ask about the use of STEEPLE (or PEST) analysis in the Internal
Assessment.
A potentially useful resource to help student with their PEST/STEEPLE analysis is https://pestleanalysis.com/
This website includes ready-made PEST analyses (and some SWOT analyses too) for numerous well-known
companies that may be applicable to the Internal Assessment.
However, as with all tools and supporting documents, make sure these are fit for purpose.
Top Tip 3!
Students are reminded that they can, but are not required to, use methods of primary market research for their
IA. However, any primary market research tools and theories used must be fit for purpose (purposeful) in relation
to the specific research question.
If you are considering to use primary market research for your business research project, make sure you read
this article on InThinking first. It contains top tips for the use of primary research for the IA.
All students are advised to read / refer to Unit 4.4 (market research) of the IB Business Management syllabus
before embarking on their research for the IA.
Top Tip 4!
IBID Press (the publisher of my 5th edn IB Business Management textbook) can send you a complimentary copy
of the Internal Assessment PowerPoint. This is a really useful resource to go through with your students before
they embark on their IA.
Please contact the publisher at IBID Press (jodie@ibid.com.au) to request your free copy of the PowerPoint file.
Visit the IBID Press website for details of the PowerPoint resource pack.
FAQ 1 - Can students use tools and theories beyond the syllabus for the IA?
Students should be discouraged from using tools and theories beyond the DP Business Management syllabus.
For example, HL candidates can apply classroom theory to real-life situations by using over 40 available tools and
theories from the syllabus, focusing on their chosen organization and conducting research to investigate business
problems or decisions.
Hence, students can access the highest mark band in the assessment criteria by sticking to the contents of the
syllabus.
Note: If students do (for whatever reason) choose to use tools and theories beyond the syllabus, they are not directly
penalized if these are relevant to the investigation and research question. Doing so is not explicitly prohibited or
mentioned in the syllabus / guide. If this approach is used, students must show clear understanding and these must
be accurately applied in order to meet the assessment rubric (assessment criteria).
Students do not get an extra credit for going beyond the syllabus.
Doing so can actually raise concerns about academic integrity as there is no need to use tools and theories that
are not featured in the syllabus (indeed, this is one of the reasons for including the BMT in the new guide).
So, ultimately, there really is no reason for students to go beyond the IB Business Management syllabus for their HL
IA because they are able to reach the highest level descriptors without having to do more than needed. Also, and very
importantly, students must remember that the right tools, theories and techniques must be used to address the
research question. So, for example, it is not appropriate for students to ignore financial analysis for a research
question about an investment issue or decision. Similarly, relying on the use of a SWOT analysis and a force field
analysis for such an IA is also not suitable either.
A related commonly asked question - by teachers and students - is whether tools and theories beyond the SL syllabus
can be used in the IA by SL students. What do you think?
Whilst SL students are not prohibited from using HL tools and theories, such an approach is neither necessary nor
encouraged by the IB.
SL students can access the top mark bands by using only the SL tools and theories from the IB Business
Management syllabus, including relevant tools from the BMT.
Essentially, it is not recommended that students go beyond the SL syllabus by using HL tools and theories or those
beyond the IB Business Management syllabus. It does not impress any IA moderator if a student chooses to go
beyond the SL syllabus, especially if the tools and theories are not suitable to the research question and/or are
applied inappropriately.
Note: If SL students do (for whatever reason) choose to use tools and theories beyond the SL syllabus, they will not
be directly penalized if these are directly relevant to the investigation and research question. Students must show
clear understanding and the chosen tools and theories must be accurately and suitably applied in order to meet the
assessment rubric (assessment criteria).
Take this example of an SL student who used force field analysis (HL only) in the Internal Assessment about Google's
acquisition of Fitbit. There are a couple of major issues with this approach:
Google had already acquired Fitbit at the time of writing; hence the use of FFA as a situational and decision-
making tool is not appropriate.
The student would not be able to get the statistical weights for the identified driving and restraining forces from
Google (doing so is unrealistic and would require access to primary research with a Google executive). Hence,
the inclusion of FFA is unsuitable.
Typically, students who use force field analysis (SL and HL) self-assign the weights based on their own opinions. This
brings in unnecessary bias to the result and invalidates the value of the findings.
In summary, the use of tools and theories not in the syllabus carries its risks. Ultimately, there really is no reason for
students to go beyond the syllabus and such an approach should be discouraged. Beside, students are able to reach
the highest level descriptors without having to do more than needed.
FAQ 2 - Are there any specific tools or theories that students should use for the IA?
Teachers should not prescribe any tools or theories for the IA. It is not advisable to apply the same tools and theories
to be used in the IA, irrespective of the research question. Some centres have been known to use of the same tools
by all students (such as SWOT, forcefield analysis, and investment appraisal - regardless of the research question);
this simply suggests that some teachers are telling their students to use these tools, irrespective of their importance
and relevance to the research question.
Note that Criterion C requires student to apply the selected tools and theories effectively and that they are clearly
relevant to the research question
FAQ 3 - How many tools (or theories) should students use in the IA?
There is no prescribed or recommended number of tools or theories that students need to use in their IA. Teachers
should not stipulate a specific number of tools and theories - this will clearly depend on student's unique research
question. Instead, students should use those which are most relevant to their specific research question. For
example, an IA that focuses on motivation should include relevant theories of motivation and relevant examples of
financial and non-financial motivators (applicable to the business organization in question). Similarly, if the research
question is about a growth strategy then Ansoff's matrix might be an appropriate tool to use, for example.
Do not simply include tools and theories just to show that you have used a range of these (see FAQ 10 above). Also,
remember that the word count limit (WCL) of 1,800 words is very tight so you need to choose your tools and theories
wisely and apply them well in order to answer the research question. For example, conducting a STEEPLE analysis
will consume a significant proportion of the WCL.
FAQ 4 - Do students have to use at least one tool from the Business Management Toolkit (BMT)?
No, they are not required to do so. As always, students should use the more relevant tool(s) and theory(ies) that
relate specifically to their research question.
Nevertheless, the BMT can be a good starting point for students, especially at the planning stage of the IA. For SL
students, the BMT contains 8 different tools that may support them in addressing the research question; for HL
students, there are 15 tools to choose from the BMT. Ultimately, students should use whatever tool(s) or theory(ies)
are most suitable for addressing the research question.
FAQ 5 - Do all aspects (components) of a particular tool or theory, such as STEEPLE analysis or curricular business
models, have to be used in the IA?
All tools and theories used in the IA (and EE) must be fit for purpose. Therefore, students are expected to use only
the most appropriate aspects of a particular tool or theory for the specific research question, examined in the context
of the chosen business organization.
This applies to any tool or theory with multiple components, such as:
Ansoff matrix
Descriptive statistics
Marketing mix
SWOT analysis
In the case of STEEPLE analysis, there is no need to refer to and use all seven components of the tool. Students
should only apply the parts that are directly relevant to the chosen business organization, i.e., how the tool/theory is
applicable to the operations of the chosen organization and written in the context of the specific research question.
In the case of circular business models, note that there are about 114 definitions of "circular economy", so there is
certainly no expectation to use every component of any theory without authentic purpose. In fact, there are only 5
circular business models that feature in the IB DP Business Management course students - these are the only ones
that students need to learn. Therefore, if students use this tool, make sure they stick to the definitions and models
used by the OECD that feature in the official BM guide - but there is no need to use/apply all five of these models in
the IA (or EE).
FAQ 6 - Should students include quantitative data and analysis in the IA?
There is no formal requirement to include quantitative data and analysis (such as final accounts or ratio analysis). The
suitable will depend on your research question - as always, the tools and theories you use must be relevant to the
research question.
For example, if the chosen topic is about non-financial motivation and the conceptual lens is ethics, the use of
financial analyses may not be relevant. However, if your research question is about above-the-line promotion
strategies or changes to a firm's pricing methods, using quantitative tools, theories, and techniques will be far more
appropriate.