Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Energy Saving Opportunities Through Variable Frequency Drive For Commercial Air Conditioners-2018
Energy Saving Opportunities Through Variable Frequency Drive For Commercial Air Conditioners-2018
Abstract— Variable Frequency Drives (VFD’s) are used in many systems are over designed most of the times. Consequently, at
applications ranging from small appliances to the largest of coal light load conditions, the air conditioning systems deliver
plant drives wherein it’s possible to achieve significant amount of excess capacity than the required capacity which leads to
energy savings through proper selection and sizing of the VFDs significant wastage of energy and hence cost. Traditional
along with suitable motors. Though we have various other
systems address light load conditions with unloading
conventional energy savings schemes available, VFD has
significant amount of energy saving potential ranging from 20% techniques— for example with hot gas bypass, or with multiple
to 65 % opportunities depending on the application and its range compressors, or with digital compressor technology—but these
of operation. As on today, air conditioners are quite commonly solutions are inefficient, either because high compressor
used and therefore electric motors are essential to be part of air efficiency cannot be maintained at light load or because load
conditioners. Electric motors driving pumps, fans, compressors matching ability is imperfect. Hot gas bypass solutions are even
and other machines are responsible for 45% of global electricity less efficient. Fig.1 highlights the Temperature vs. Time in
use in worldwide wherein huge energy savings opportunities are Fixed speed compressor operation with respect to set point
available [4]. But at the same time, energy savings opportunities temperature wherein set point is maintained by on-off cycling.
are not explored by user due to lack of awareness on the energy
savings opportunities. The purpose of this paper is to show how
to save energy through VFD controlled motor driven systems for
compressor used in air conditioner applications. In this paper,
the possible energy savings opportunities between Fixed Speed
Motor Compressors Vs. VFD controlled Motor compressors is
presented.
978-1-5386-3695-4$31.00 2018
c IEEE 338
conditioning systems requirements. Fig.2 highlights the achieved by continuously varying speed of the motor through
Temperature vs. Time in VFD controlled compressor operation VFD which leads to lesser oscillations around the set point.
with respect to set point temperature wherein set point is
IEER=(0.02*A) + (0.617*B) + (0.238*C) + (0.125*C) … (1) From the IEER, it can be seen that the 100%, 75%, 50% and
25% capacities are utilized 2%, 61.7%, 23.8& and 12.5% of the
Where: year. This conveys that compressor runs most of the time in
A = EER at 100% Capacity at AHRI Standard Rating year on partial loads which is a crucial information should be
Conditions accounted by the customers. Also cost saving for a given
B = EER at 75% Capacity and reduced condenser temperature system is about INR 77935.18/year which will lead ROI in few
C = EER at 50% Capacity and reduced condenser temperature months from the installation. From this comparison we can
D = EER at 25% Capacity and reduced condenser temperature clearly say that the variable speed compressor increases the
The IEER rating requires that the unit efficiency be determined efficiency and decreases the energy cost to a great extent.
at 100%, 75%, 50%, and 25% Percent Load at the conditions
specified in Table 6 and at the part load rated airflow, if
different than the full load rated airflow. This A, B, C, D values VI. CONCLUSION
changes depends on the climatic conditions of the particular
country which are defined in table 3 and 6 in AHRI Standard It’s clear from the above table, VFD controls the motor such
340/360 (I-P)-2015[6]. that compressor delivers the required capacity. As a result of
EER is known as energy efficiency ratio which can be this VFD, energy savings can be significantly improved which
calculated as a ratio of cooling capacity to the power input. The leads lower energy consumption at partial loads and hence cost.
EER at 100% Capacity is the Standard Energy Efficiency Apart from this cost, it leads to improved PF. Payback period is
Ratio. No additional test at 100% Cooling Capacity is required. less than year in most cases and therefore its very important to
create an awareness about the energy savings, payback period
EER = Cooling Capacity/ Input Power …………. (2) and life cycle costs.