You are on page 1of 14

.

Journal of Asian Business Strategy

journal homepage: http://aessweb.com/journal-detail.php?id=5006

Customer Satisfaction in the Restaurant Industry; Examining the Model in Local


Industry Perspective

Raja Irfan Sabir


Assistant Professor; Comsats Institute of Information Technology, Sahiwal Campus, Pakistan
Muhammad Irfan
Lecturer; Universty of Education Lahore Okara Campus, Pakistan
Naeem Akhtar
MS Scholar; Comsats Institute of Information Technology, Sahiwal Campus, Pakistan
Muhammad Abbas Pervez
Lecturer; Govt College of Technology Sahiwal, Pakistan
Asad ur Rehman
MS Scholar; Comsats Institute of Information Technology, Sahiwal Campus, Pakistan

Abstract
Customer satisfaction plays a pivotal role in success of every business organization whether it is
meant for a product or a service. Every business needs not only to retain its current customers but
also to expand customer’s base significantly and it is possible only when target customer is fully
satisfied from company on some parameters. The objective of study is to construct comprehensive
model of customer satisfaction in fast growing restaurant industry covering all the major dimensions
of concept.. Secondary research and Quantitative techniques were used to explain the concept of
customer satisfaction. Stratified random sampling was used for this purpose for data analysis
purpose, Correlation and multiple regressions while using SPSS-16 were used to test the model. This
research will add in existing base of knowledge on vast topic of customer satisfaction while focusing
on local restaurant industry.
Keywords: Customer satisfaction, service quality, food reliability

Introduction1 The restaurant industry has become one of the


most profitable industries in the world.
International and local restaurant chains are
satisfying the demand of customers in variety
Corresponding author’s details:
of range of products and services. The ready
Name: Muhammad Irfan
to eat segment (fast Food) has given a new
Email address: irfaniba@yahoo.com

18
Journal of Asian Business Strategy, 4(1)2014: 18-31

dimension to the industry so that Fast food Research questions


restaurants like Pizza Hut, KFC, AFC are Reference to the research objective following
taking very good business in most of the part research questions are to be addressed by this
of world as well as in many cities of Pakistan study;
and they are spreading their branches very 1- What are the determinants of
successfully. Basically this is the era of customer satisfaction in full service restaurant
globalization and due to advancement of industry?
media world is shrinking in terms of culture 2- What is impact of service quality,
and habits so the fashions as well as eating product reliability, price and physical design
patterns are also being opted among all over on customer satisfaction in restaurant
the world and this the reason for such a huge industry?
spread of restaurant industry in the world.
Customer satisfaction is very important for Significance of study
every organization; either they are service A thorough understanding and knowledge of
sector or the privet sector. Customers are the the factors that have impact on customer
actual agents or stakeholders for determining satisfaction are very useful in guiding
or best judging the success of any product or restaurant owners and managers to design and
service. deliver the right offering and strategies. Also
research has many future implications. It has
The purpose of this study is to investigate the potential to check the moderating effect of
factors or determinants which are making culture sensitivity and also it can determine
significant impact on customer satisfaction in the mediating role of customer satisfaction
this industry in reference to our focus area of and its impact on brand or customer loyalty in
Pakistan. For this we studied the behaviour of further. This will be of unique in terms of
customers of some big Restaurant outlets in local environment and will have many
Okara city. The methodology used was data implications for restaurant owners, managers
collection through structured questionnaire and researchers of particular community.
from sample of target population and then this
data was statistically analyzed via SPSS Literature review
version 16.
Customer satisfaction
Objective of the study Qualities of brand characteristics that are
The objective of the study is to find out the offered by company determine the level of
essential factors or determinants of customers’ customer satisfaction. (Khan & Afsheen,
satisfaction in the restaurant industry of 2012).
Pakistan.
Customer satisfaction can be defined in terms
of meeting the expectations of the customers
in terms of parameters associated with
satisfaction (Malik & Ghaffor, 2012).
19
Journal of Asian Business Strategy, 4(1)2014: 18-31

According to Johan; the customer mind is a tunes and different various other atmospheric
complex set of thoughts and ideas and cannot components included in this effect in
be fully predictable by human being. customer satisfaction. Complete support
Thorsten and Alexander (1997) found dining places ought to give attention to 3
Customer satisfaction with the product and elements – support good quality
services of company as the strategic factor for (responsiveness), cost, along with meals good
competitive advantage. In the context of quality (reliability) in the event customer
relationship marketing, customer satisfaction satisfaction will be dealt with like a
is the way that leads to long term customer organizing variable. Oliver (1981) expressed
retention because un satisfied customers have in which pleasure shortly decays directly into
very high switching rate (Lin & Wu, 2011). one’s total mindset

According to Zairi (2000) the feeling of “Satisfaction can be regarded as a broad


accomplishment of inner desires is called principle; support good quality is a component
satisfaction. Customer satisfaction has direct of satisfaction” (Zeithaml and Bitner, 2003).
effect on customer loyalty (Mittal & Lassar, Client satisfaction is usually defined through
1998). If product or service fulfils the needs Oliver’s (1997) conditions: that it's this
and demand of customer he will become consumer’s fulfilment result. It's a ruling that
satisfied and will be converted to loyal a products or services feature, or this products
customer and thus will add in customer equity or services per se, comes with a pleasurable
of company. Company profitability is not only level of intake linked fulfilment. In other
depicted in its balance sheet but it is also words, it does not take total level of well-
measured on basis of its sound customer base being that has a service /product knowledge.
and life time value that customers deliver to
company. Oliver (1993) suggest in his study Full satisfaction is usually ordinarily deemed
customer satisfaction is the core philosophy of as a general affective result resulting from the
marketing strategy of any organization and application of some sort of products or
plays a key role in an organization success. In services (Oliver 1981).
fact customer satisfaction is the core principle
of the modern tool of CRM being used by There is positive romantic relationship
marketers to attract and retain customers. between fulfilment and also devotion.
Szymanski and Henard (2001), inside their
Lim (2010) Customers final pleasure may meta-analysis, reveal 15 positive and also
have significant affect connected with major correlations between 2 constructs.
atmosphere. Bodily environment are useful to Bearden and Teel (1983) in addition have
produce graphic within the mind connected granted a new romantic relationship between
with customer in order to affect their own fulfilment and also devotion.
behavior. Bodily atmosphere with the dining
places have the significant has an effect on for We employed transaction-specific model
the clients pleasure. Super, providing, routed, within advised because suggested through
20
Journal of Asian Business Strategy, 4(1)2014: 18-31

function ended up being accomplished on quite a few scientists most often make use of
there through Teas (1993) and Cronin Jr et program excellent in order to measure
al., (1994). In this way research question or customer satisfaction Zeithaml (1985).
even target is usually interested mainly The researcher found that greater you give
because much like this product customer service as per customer requirement or need,
satisfaction within all round is usually greater will be the level of satisfaction and
dependent upon judging the feeling or even vice versa. Analysts described the direct
final results along with number of positive relationship of service quality with
measurements just like program excellent, customer satisfaction (Parasuraman et al.,
merchandise excellent and price (PZB, 1994). 1988). Athanassopoulos, (2000) identified
development, responsiveness, price, and
In addition, using the transaction-specific program excellence as centre measurement
product, most of us reveal which the associated with customers’ satisfaction.
merchandise providing for your complete
program restaurant industry should be known Service quality is not an easy task to quantify
as a mix of program and also merchandise and being evaluated, because it is not a
functions. Therefore, clients will take into product to quantify but it is customer’s
account these issues with deal for example evaluation and subjective perception about
merchandise characteristics (e. g. food something (George & Jones, 1991). Takeuchi
excellent and also restaurant ambience), (1983) quality is such an important
program attributes (e. g. responsiveness of the characteristic or feature of something that
representative), and also price so you can get make some differentiation in your product and
an overall fulfilment from restaurant. The stands you remarkable in terms of
Theoretical frame function as well as the competitative advantage. Service quality is
worried ideas are shown yearly part, and also evaluated when the user of service compare
chapters upon research process, your analyses, his perception with actual experience.
final results, and also conversation can also be Gronroos (1984) Satisfaction is wide concept
incorporated. and is impacted by many factors and service
quality is one of the major determinants of
Service quality customer satisfaction (Zeithaml and Bitner,
Ayse (2007) Top quality includes 2 main 2003). Bitner and Hubbert (1994) give two
factors: (1) the merchandise fulfils wants or options of explaining the phenomena:
even (2) around that levels it truly is free from satisfaction as result of some particular
insufficiencies (Juran, 1988). Service is kind experience or event combined effect of
of performance that's proposed by 1 get satisfaction.
together to an alternative and also within
corporeality can be a ought to part of it SERVQUAL product supplies a beneficial
(Kotler & Keller, 2006). Through way to be associated with computing
acknowledged the necessity associated with program excellent produced by PZB within
methods associated with program excellent 1988, as outlined by this product customers’
21
Journal of Asian Business Strategy, 4(1)2014: 18-31

awareness and also anticipations starting upon SERVQUAL literature, is identified as the
all 5 measurements: tangibles (Actual willingness of the staff to be helpful and to
environment or even design), reliability provide prompt service to the customer. In full
(Product quality), responsiveness (Service service restaurants, customers expect the
quality), assurance and also sympathy. servers to understand their needs and address
Determined by aspects associated with them in a timely manner. SO, the quality of
SERVQUAL product exact same final results service includes many factors and
are already put on restaurant industry through responsiveness is among one of those factors
Stevens (1995) and also he or she created which satisfy the customer on dimension of
DINESERV from SERVQUAL. Inside the service quality
restaurant industry, only an element of
providing can be a program and it's also Product quality or reliability
intangible and also generation and also Product quality has same importance in full
utilization of merchandise have become service restaurant industry as like service
significantly within close up affiliation. quality. More you are reliable in terms of your
Furthermore customer wish wide variety and product quality more customers will be
also self assortment plus they evaluate one’s satisfies with your product. It is the part of
providing along with some others when they Customer relationship management (CRM)
have got clusters associated with eating places that how much your customer depends upon
inside their thoughts because of reference reliability of your core product. Once
point teams (Neal, 1999). customer is satisfied on reliability of full
service restaurant, he would not only become
Authentic measurements associated with loyal customer but also will become brand
SERVQUAL don't need to be incorporated. ambassador and will add in customer equity
Inside the restaurant industry, customer’s of the restaurant.
chance just isn't a lot of large because of the
purchase price, the results of the program, as In different organization business we will
well as the alternatives available. Hence discover all 5 most critical measurements
assurance just isn't because significant within which make a very good organization and also
this industry. In the same manner, sympathy is these are generally program excellent,
outlined within the SERVQUAL materials perceptible, trustworthiness, responsiveness
because particular person consideration and assurance and etc. (Azadavar et al., 2011).
also attention that's inclined to each customer. Satya (2011) identified it is compulsory for
This sizing is a lot more applicable in order to corporations to maintain their own excellence
companies where “relationship marketing” in quality mainly because everyone is a lot
instead of “transaction marketing” is vital on more attentive to quality excellence as
the business. However trustworthiness and compared to price. The consumers someday
also responsiveness operating industry just buy better brand in terms of quality instead of
like restaurant can be a lot more much better. thinking about of the price issue (Rajput et al.,
Responsiveness, as defined by the 2012). Tsiaotso, (2006) identified a good
22
Journal of Asian Business Strategy, 4(1)2014: 18-31

primary influence associated with perceived associated with restaurant merchandise


quality upon acquire intentions. furthermore vary according to style of
restaurant. If your price is large, clients may
Physical design very well expect premium quality. ” Also, in
On the view associated with actual physical the event the price is minimal, clients may
layout, environment psychologists declare that perhaps believe that restaurant is poor in
people answer areas along with two general, terms of merchandise and also program
and also opposite, types of actions: strategy or excellent. Furthermore, because of the
even prevention (Mehrabian and Russell, competition within of the restaurant industry,
1974). It is advised of which besides the clients will be able to identify interior
actual physical measurements of the reference point price ranges inside their head
organization attracting or even deterring plus they constantly evaluate and also analyze
assortment, actual physical layout of the the values in terms of many characteristics
organization can also influence the amount associated with restaurant upon every acquire,
associated with accomplishment consumers an inside reference point price is understood
attain after within (Darley and also Gilbert, to be an expense within potential buyers
1985). This involves research about the ‘memory of which acts as a criteria intended
“ambiance” (Bitner, 1992) which is “artificial for contrasting precise price ranges (Grewal et
environment” and also how it influences both al., 1998).
clients and also workers within the program
process. Besides previously mentioned variables
preference associated with merchandise,
Price campaign, within aspect actual physical
Price has a significant role in selecting a environment and also program excellent also
product. For company point of view price is have major romantic relationship toward
reward or value given in return of need customer satisfaction within fast food industry
fulfilment to company. Perceived customer associated with chosen human population.
expectations and price should be in Andleeb (2006) researched of which price or
accordance with each other. cost associated with restaurant furthermore
varies as outlined by style of restaurant.
Skindaras (2009) we can discover a lot of Shoppers may very well understand price
merchandise on this planet possessing associated with restaurant in terms of its
different price ranges. merchandise and also program excellent. In
accordance with Chang & Wildt (1998) the
Price is one of the four P’s of Marketing Mix value provides its major influence upon
that has significant role in implementation of customer perception about quality if it's really
marketing strategy. (Kottler & Armstrong the only details indicated available. In respect
2012). Han (2009) claim that one of the most the study associated with buyer want to
adaptable factors which improved quickly is undertake a price and also quality instead of
the pricing (Andalleb et al., 2006) the costs
23
Journal of Asian Business Strategy, 4(1)2014: 18-31

complex elements within sturdy items (Chui relative impact on customer satisfaction but
et al., 2006). the core variables that are chosen in this study
are included in theoretical framework and
Theoretical frame work and hypothesis their hypothesis are made accordingly for
Research has found that there are a no of further research.
factors which are contributing towards
customer satisfaction in restaurant industry. Model diagram
Many researchers have done lot of work on Following diagram shows the relationship of
the concept and many elaborated it in variables both dependent and independent
different dimensions like taste of product, variables, customer satisfaction is dependent
Sales promotion, brand image, brand trust , variable and Responsiveness, Reliability or
physical location of the restaurant , product Product quality, Physical design and price are
and service quality, physical atmosphere or few of the major independent variables in our
design and pricing etc. All variables have their study.

Independent variable Dependent variable

Responsiveness

Product Quality
Customer
Satisfactio
Physical design

Price

Hypothesis
H1a. The more reliable the service provided H4. The physical design and appearance of
by the restaurant, the greater the level of the restaurant, is positively related with
customer satisfaction. customer satisfaction.
H5: The negative deviation in price, is
Within Responsiveness (service quality) we negatively related with customer satisfaction
can also propose below mentioned hypothesis;
H2. The responsiveness is positively related
with customer satisfaction.
H3: The food quality is positively related with
customer satisfaction.
24
Journal of Asian Business Strategy, 4(1)2014: 18-31

Methodology central concept customer satisfaction. The


reliability of instrument was checked first
Sampling and data collection through pilot testing by using chron bach
Convenience sampling technique was used to alpha. The data was collected on five point
collect the data from a sample of 130 licker scale.
customers on same point of purchase and
consumption inside the restaurant. A Data analysis section
structured questionnaire on Five point Licker
scale was used to collect the data. Demographic summary
To check the reliability of instrument I made
Development of instrument reliability analysis and find out the value of
The survey questionnaire measured four chron bach alpha for each individual variable
dimensions or determinants and their effect on in SPSS.

Table 1: Reliability analysis


Demography Count Proportion
Gender
Male 64 64%
Female 36 36%
Age
Below 15 years 1 1%
15 years but below 30 years 81 81%
30 years but below 45 years 9 9%
45 years or above 9 9%
Income
Below 15,000 40 40%
From 15000 to 29,999 29 29%
From 30,000 to 44,999 17 17%
From 45,000 to 59,999 06 06%
60,000 or Above 07 07%
Occupation
Teacher 19 19%
Banker 29 29%
Lawyer 12 12%
Business Person 30 30%
Other 10 10%
Note: Mean and standard deviation of each item under heading of item statistics of each variable is also given
in table A in Annexure

Table 2: Correlation coefficients


Variable Chron bach alpha N of items
Responsiveness (service quality) 0.730 10
Reliability (Product Quality) 0.55 2
Physical Design 0.60 4
Price 0.60 2
Customer satisfaction 0.70 3

25
Journal of Asian Business Strategy, 4(1)2014: 18-31

Interpretation Okara city is reliable and consistent with the


The above table shows that data collected scale.
from respondents from selected restaurants in

Table 3: Multiple regression analysis


SQ PQ PRICE CS Design
Pearson Correlation 1 .593** 0.019 .340** .533**
SQ Sig. (2-tailed) 0 0.83 0 0
N 130 130 130 130 130
Pearson Correlation .593** 1 0.056 .245** .409**
PQ Sig. (2-tailed) 0 0.525 0.005 0
N 130 130 130 130 130
Pearson Correlation 0.019 0.056 1 -.351** -0.046
PRICE Sig. (2-tailed) 0.83 0.525 0 0.602
N 130 130 130 130 130
Pearson Correlation .340** .245** -.351** 1 .341**
CS Sig. (2-tailed) 0 0.005 0 0
N 130 130 130 130 130
Pearson Correlation .533** .409** -0.046 .341** 1
Design Sig. (2-tailed) 0 0 0.602 0
N 130 130 130 130 130
P< 0.01

Interpretation strong level of significance exists among all


Correlation is a technique which measure the other variables of study.
strength of association between two variables When we find the relationship between one
the results show there is positive correlation dependent variable and one or more
among the variables of study but price has independent variables we go for regression
negative correlation with customer analysis. Correlations only find association
satisfaction and physical design. As, between variables but regression measures
Correlation is significant at 0.01 level(2- how much there are variation in dependent
tailed), here result shows there is low variable due to change in one or more
significance b/w price and other variables like independent variables. When there are two or
customer satisfaction and physical design and more independent variables in study we go for
multiple regressions.

Model summary
Model R R Square Adjusted R Square Std. Error of the Estimate
1 .523a 0.274 0.25 0.76936
a. Predictors: (Constant), Design, PRICE, PQ, SQ

Interpretation of adjusted r square to price, product quality, service quality and


The value of adjusted R square shows that physical design as a whole and remaining
customer satisfaction is affected by 25% due 75% is due to other factors that are being held

26
Journal of Asian Business Strategy, 4(1)2014: 18-31

constant in this study but they have their checked in Anova table. The value of F
impact on the concept. Goodness of fit is also statistic shows the overall Fitness in model.

Multiple regression coefficients


Unstandardized Standardized
Model
Coefficients Coefficients
B Std. Error Beta T Sig.
(Constant) 2.313 0.543 4.257 0
SQ 0.35 0.172 0.21 2.032 0.044
1 PQ 0.067 0.101 0.064 0.666 0.507
PRICE -0.31 0.068 -0.35 -4.575 0
Design 0.236 0.115 0.187 2.047 0.043
a. Dependent Variable: CS
P<0.01

Interpretation The results show that restaurant owners


Multiple regression analysis was used to test should focus more on these four factors of
the model with four independent variable and service quality, physical design, product
customer satisfaction as one dependent quality and price if they think customer
variable. satisfaction as part of their marketing strategy
yet among all these four variables they should
The results show that variables under heading take service quality as the most important tool
of un standardized coefficients shows how of customer satisfaction.
much dependent variables is caused or
effected by independent variables. Here value All of the major elements of service quality in
shows all independent variables positively SERVQUAL MODEL are being used under
affect the customer satisfaction except price heading of responsiveness to check the service
with negative value. The values of Beta quality that is contributing maximum towards
(Standardized coefficient) shows that service customer satisfaction in full service restaurant
quality has much positive impact on customer industry.
satisfaction with (B: 0.210), Physical design
has 2nd largest importance as (B; 0. 187) and From managerial perspective it is important to
Product quality or reliability has weak develop training programs to build up the
relationship as (B: 0.064). On the other hand responsiveness of employees, their attitude,
Price has negative relationship with customer knowledge and all other dimensions of
satisfaction as (B: -0. 350). Servqual model. The negative beta value of
price in multiple regression models indicates
Conclusion and discussion that when price is not in accordance with the
expectations of customers their satisfaction
This study tested the model of customer level declines. As per Secondary research
satisfaction in full service restaurant industry. customer have reference prices in their minds

27
Journal of Asian Business Strategy, 4(1)2014: 18-31

and memories when they go to buy something restaurants either for meal or for social
(Grewal et al., 1998). So, full service gatherings and as symbol of their prestige and
restaurants should reposition their prices to social status.
take the confidence of customers.
References
Based on the regression coefficients, the beta
value for Product quality or reliability is very Andaleeb, S. S., & Conway, C. (2006).
low. Initially it looks surprising but in modern Customer satisfaction in the restaurant
and high growing restaurant food industry, it industry: an examination of the
is not as much important tool to differentiate transaction-specific model. Journal of
the positioning on basis of quality as it is Services Marketing , 20(1), 3-11.
presumed by customers that all restaurants of Athanassopoulos, A. D. (2000). Customer
almost equal levels are giving same food satisfaction cues to support market
quality. So, the point of differentiation is not segmentation and explain switching
food quality now. behavior. Journal of Business
Research, 47(3), 191–207.
As per results physical design or atmosphere Ayse Ozfer Ozcelik, L. S. A. M. S. S. (2007).
nd
has 2 largest contributing effect towards An Evaluation of Fast-Food
customer satisfaction. Now in this age only Preferences According to Gender.
atmosphere is not the criteria of satisfaction Humanity & Social Sciences Journal,
but it should be blended with other factors like 2(1), 43-50.
service quality also. Azadavar, R., Shahbazi, D., & Teimouri, E.
(2011). The role of security as a
Future research customer perception of customers’
– To explain customer satisfaction in a better online purchasing behavior,
way, it is important to look at additional International conference on software
factors or seek better measures of the and computer applications IPCSIT, 9.
constructs (Divide the dimension or variables Bearden, W. O., & Teel, J. E. (1983). Selected
of construct into all possible elements). determinants of consumer satisfaction
and complaints reports. Journal of
The value of adjusted R square indicates that Marketing Research, 20, 21-28.
there is limitation and need of more in depth Bitner, M. J. (1992). Service scapes: the
study in this field. As, apart from these four impact of physical surroundings on
variables discussed in this study there are customers and employees, Journal of
some other variables also which affects Marketing, 56, 57-71.
customer satisfaction. Bitner, M. J., & Hubert, A. R. (1994).
Encounter satisfaction versus overall
Second assumption to be studied is what the satisfaction versus quality in Rust, R.
primary reason customer is going to T. and Oliver, R. L. (Eds), Service

28
Journal of Asian Business Strategy, 4(1)2014: 18-31

Quality: New Directions in Theory Han, H., & Rye, K. (2009). The roles of the
and Practice, Sage, Thousand Oaks, physical environment, price
CA, pp. 76-7. perception, and customer satisfaction
in determining customer loyalty in the
Chang, Z. & Wildt, R. (1998). Impact of restaurant industry. J. Hosp. Tour.
product information on the use of Res., 33(4), 487-510.
price as a quality cue. Psychology & Juran, J. M. (1988). Juran’s quality control
Marketing, 13(1), 55-75. handbook. McGraw-Hill, New York,
Chiu, J., Chen, H., Tzeng, G., & Shyu, J., NY.
(2006). Marketing strategy based on Khan, & Afsheen, (2012). Determinants of
customer behavior for the LCD-TV. customer satisfaction in telecom
Int. J. Management and Decision industry, a study of telecom industry
Making, 7(2/30), 143-165. Peshawar KPK Pakistan. Journal of
Darley, J. M., & Gilbert, D. T. (1985). Social Basic and Applied Scientific Research,
psychological aspects of 2(12), 12833-12840.
environmental psychology in Lindzey, Kotler, P. & Armstrong, G. (2012). Principles
G. and Aronson, E. (Eds), Handbook of Marketing 14th ed, New Jersey:
of Social Psychology, 3rd ed., Prentice Hall.
Random House, Inc., New York, NY, Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2006). Marketing
pp. 949-991. Management pp. 402, New Delhi,
George, J. M., & Jones, G. R. (1991). India: Prentice-Hall.
Towards an understanding of Lim, H. (2010). Understanding American
customer service quality. Journal of customer perceptions on Japanese
Managerial Issues, 3, 220-238. food and services in the U. S. UNLV
Grewal, D. Monroe, K. B., & Krishnan, R. Theses dissertations professional
(1998). The effects of price- papers capstones.
comparison advertising on buyers’ Lin, J. S. C., & Wu, C. Y. (2011). The role of
perceptions of acquisitions value, expected future use in relationship-
transaction value, and behavioural based service retention. Managing
intentions. Journal of Marketing, Service Quality, 21(5), 535-551.
62(2), 46-59. Malik, E., & Ghaffor, M. (2012). Impact of
Gronroos. (1984). A service quality model brand image, service quality and price
and its marketing implications. on customer satisfaction in Pakistan
Journal of the Academy of Marketing telecommunication sector.
Science, 24, 36 – 44. International Journal of Business and
Gronroos (1984). A service quality model and Social Science , 3(2), 123.
its marketing implications. Journal of Mehrabian, A., & James, R. (1974). An
the Academy of Marketing Science, approach to environmental
24, 36 – 44.

29
Journal of Asian Business Strategy, 4(1)2014: 18-31

psychology, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT service quality. Journal of Marketing,


press. 58(1), 125.
Mittal, B., & Walfried M. Lassar (1998). why Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V., & Berry, L.
do customers switch? The dynamics (1994). Reassessment of expectations
of satisfaction versus loyalty. Journal as a comparison standard in measuring
of Services Marketing, 12(3), 177-194. service quality implications for further
Neal, W. D. (1999). Satisfaction is nice, but research. Journal of Marketing, 58(1),
value drives loyalty. Marketing 111-124.
Research, 11(1), 20-23. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V., & Berry, L.
Oliver, R. L. (1981). Measurement and (1988). SERVQUAL: a multiple-item
evaluation of satisfaction process in scale for measuring consumer
retail settings. Journal of Retailing, perceptions of service quality. Journal
57, 25-48. of Retailing, 64(1), 12-37.
Oliver, R. L. (1993). A conceptual model of Rajput, D. A., Ansir A., Kalhoro., Sabir
service quality and service Hussain., & Wasif, R. (2012). Impact
satisfaction: compatible goals and of product price and quality on
different concepts, In Swart, T. A., consumer buying behavior: evidence
Bowen, D. E., and Brown, S. W. from Pakistan. Interdisciplinary
(eds.) advances in service marketing Journal of Contemporary Research In
and management, 3, JAI press, Business, 4(4), 485.
Greenwich, CT, 65-86. Rust, Roland T., & Richard L. Oliver.
Oliver, R. L. (1997). Satisfaction a (2000). Should We Delight the
behavioural perspective on the Customer? Journal of the Academy of
customer, New York: McGraw-Hill. Marketing Science, 28, 86-94.
Oliver, R. L. (1999). Whence consumer Satya, S. (2011). Retailer’s perspective on
loyalty. The Journal of Marketing, support services offered by vembanad
Fundamental Issues and Directions white cement. Journal of Economics
for Marketing, 63, 33-44. and Behavioral Studies, 2(5), 186-
Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V., & Berry, L. 190.
(1985). A conceptual model of service Skindaras, R. V. V. S. D. (2009). The
quality and its implications for future relationship between Price and
research, Journal of Marketing, 49(4), Loyalty in Services Industry, ISSN
41-50. 1392 – 2785 Inzinerine Ekonomika-
Cronin Jr., J. Joseph; Taylor, Steven A. Engineering Economics Commerce of
(1994). SERVPERF versus engineering decisions, p. 3.
SERVQUAL: reconciling Stevens, P. (1995). DINESERV a tool for
performance-based and perceptions- measuring service quality in
minus-expectations measurement of restaurants. Cornell Hotel &

30
Journal of Asian Business Strategy, 4(1)2014: 18-31

Restaurant Administration Quarterly, Teas, K. (1993). Expectations, performance


36(2), 56-60. evaluation, and customers’
Szymanski, D. M., & Henard, D. H. (2001). perceptions of quality. Journal of
Customer satisfaction: A meta- Marketing, 57(4), 18-34.
analysis of the empirical evidence. Zairi, M. (2000). Managing customer
Academy of Marketing Science dissatisfaction through effective
Journal, 29(1), 16-35. complaint management systems. The
Tsiotsou, R (2006). The role of perceived TQM Magazine, 12(5), 331-335.
product quality and overall Zeithaml, P. A. (1985). A conceptual model
satisfaction on purchase intentions. of service quality and its implication
International Journal of Consumer for future research. Journal of
Studies, 30(2), 207-217. Marketing Research, 49, 41-50.
Takeuchi, H. A. J. A. Q. (1983 July-August). Zeithaml, V., & Bitner, M. J. (2003). Services
Quality is more than making a good Marketing, 3rd ed, McGraw-Hill
product. Harvard Business Review, Irwin, Boston, MA.
61, 139-145.
Thorsten, H. T., & Alexander, K. (1997). The
impact of customer satisfaction and
relationship quality on customer
retention: a critical reassessment and
model development. Psychology &
Marketing, 14(8), 737–764.

31

You might also like