Differencesand Similarities Between Clinical Psychologyand Sport Psychology

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.
net/publication/374730325
Differences and Similarities Between Clinical Psychology and Sport

Psychology
Article · October 2023
CITATIONS READS
0 300
1 author:
Bilal Semih Bozdemir

St Clements University
20 PUBLICATIONS 13 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by Bilal Semih Bozdemir on 15 October 2023.
The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

CURRENT SCIENCE
Differences and Similarities Between Clinical Psychology

and Sport Psychology
Dr. Güçlü Metin Dökümbilek
Article Advisor: Prof. Dr. Bilal Semih Bozdemir
To cite this article: Collaborate, Current Science, Volume 5, No. 5-10, 2023, p.
265– 291. - 0099-0001-2310-1011.
Our studies are in a format accredited, approved, and supported by EAALS -

European Academic Studies and Laboratory Services. (“Scientific Studies -
Current Science Georgia”) “EAALS offers all our works, services, and
publications to the world scientists at the stage of carrying our control,
accreditation, and support processes to the international platform.”
(“CURRENT
SCIENCE”) (“Scientific Studies - Current Science Georgia”)
ISSN: 2667-9515
Barcode: 977266795001
1
THIS JOURNAL INCLUDED IN MANY INDEXES, INCLUDING
ADVANCED SCIENCES INDEX. ADVANCED SCIENCES INDEX (ASI)
EUROPEAN SCIENCE EVALUATION CENTER KIRCHSTRASSE 4.56761 |
RHINELAND-PALATINATE, GERMANY PHONE: +49(177) 8684-353
PHONE: +49(177) 8684-353 EMAILS:
ASI@EUROPE.DE
CURRENT SCIENCE
Editors Group:
Concessionaire: Tsisana Kharabadze
Niyaz Bokvadze
Prof. Sabrina Corbi
Prof. Samantha Lewes
Assoc. Prof. Osman Doruk
""• Current Science Multidisciplinary Academic Journal with

Review Panel is a monthly multidisciplinary academic" (“CURRENT SCIENCE
(“Scientific Studies - Current
Science Georgia”) (“Scientific Studies - Current Science Georgia”) Science
Georgia”) journal with a multi-science peer-review." (“Scientific Studies -
Current Science
Georgia”) (“Scientific Studies -
Current Science Georgia”)
""The magazine will be at the subscriber's address in the first week of the
month.""
(“Scientific Studies - Current Science Georgia”)
• The journal continues to be included in all international rankings and

registrations. Quality articles and publications accelerate this (“Scientific
Studies
2
PHONE: +49(177) 8684-353 EMAILS:
ASI@EUROPE.DE
CURRENT SCIENCE
- Current Science Georgia”)
""• Response or rejection time for applications varies between 30 and 90 days.""
(“Scientific Studies - Current Science Georgia”)
Abstract
In general, the integration of clinical psychology and sport psychology has yielded a
comprehensive strategy to providing assistance to athletes (Drew & Morris, 2020). The
integration of clinical knowledge and experience from professional psychologists with
performance-focused tactics used in sport psychology may provide athletes with a complete
support system that attends to their psychological well-being as well as their performance
objectives.The integration of evidence-based interventions, such as acceptance and
commitment therapy and traditional cognitive behavioral approaches, can be observed in the
therapeutic practices of clinical psychology. Additionally, the distinctions and similarities
between applied psychology and clinical psychology are evident in the application of these
interventions in both clinical psychology and sport psychology practices (Wolanin & Marks,
2019). The incorporation of clinical psychology therapies into sport psychology facilitates a
holistic strategy that takes into account the athlete's psychological well-being and performance
objectives. Furthermore, it is important to note that while there may exist some similarities in
the therapies used, applied psychology and clinical psychology are characterized by unique
3
PHONE: +49(177) 8684-353 EMAILS:
ASI@EUROPE.DE
CURRENT SCIENCE
areas of emphasis and scopes of practice. The field of applied psychology, specifically sport
psychology, is dedicated to optimizing performance across many domains, with a particular
emphasis on sports.In contrast, clinical psychology is largely focused on the identification and
management of mental health issues.
Keywords: Differences and Similarities Between Psychology Subheadings, Clinical

Psychology, Sport Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Sport Psychology, Clinic
Psychological Applications with Sport Psychology
Introduction
Despite the divergent emphases and extents of applied psychology and clinical psychology,
there is an increasing acknowledgment of the significance of cooperation between these two
disciplines. The growing diversity of applied sport psychology techniques is apparent, as sport
psychologists are often tasked with addressing non-performance concerns, such as clinical
difficulties (Drew & Morris, 2020). To ensure the provision of efficacious therapeutic
assistance, it is essential for practitioners to contemplate the integration of evidence-based
therapies derived from the realms of clinical psychology and athletic psychology (Wolanin &
Marks, 2019). Acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT), a therapeutic approach with
scientific evidence in addressing mental health issues, has been modified to enhance sports
performance as well.
The use of acceptance and commitment therapy within treatments in the field of sport
psychology has the potential to augment athlete receptiveness and boost overall results.
Furthermore, the integration of conventional cognitive behavioral techniques, widely used in
clinical psychology and athletic psychology, might provide efficacious therapeutic
interventions. One instance of cross-disciplinary application is the use of behavioral activation,
a therapeutic technique often employed in clinical psychology for the treatment of depression.
4
PHONE: +49(177) 8684-353 EMAILS:
ASI@EUROPE.DE
CURRENT SCIENCE
This technique may also be effectively employed in the field of sport psychology to assist
athletes in establishing and attaining performance-related objectives.
One instance illustrating the amalgamation of clinical psychology and sport psychology
therapies is seen in the research conducted by Rotheram, Maynard, and Rogers (Drew & Morris,
2020). An integrated strategy was used in the treatment of an athlete who presented symptoms
of anxiousness. The researchers used methodologies from clinical psychology and sport
psychology in order to effectively manage the athlete's anxiety symptoms and enhance their
performance. In the aforementioned case study, the clinical psychologist and sport psychologist
engaged in a collaborative effort with the broader team to develop a problem-solving strategy.
The incorporation of clinical psychology and sport psychology therapies facilitated a
comprehensive treatment strategy that effectively targeted the mental health and performance-
related issues of the athlete (Wolanin & Marks, 2019). The commonalities between applied
psychology and clinical psychology are apparent in their mutual use of evidence-based
therapies and acknowledgment of the significance of collaborative approaches.
Methodology
In summary, the incorporation of clinical psychology and athletic psychology within
therapeutic contexts has the potential to enhance the efficacy of therapies. This technique
enables a complete treatment strategy that effectively tackles the mental health problems and
performance-related challenges experienced by people. To attain this objective, it is advisable
for practitioners to take into account psychological therapies that are supported by empirical
evidence in the fields of clinical psychology and sport psychology, if feasible. This
methodology has the potential to provide athletes with psychological assistance that is grounded
in clinical knowledge and attuned to their unique requirements as individuals engaged in
performance. In summary, the integration of clinical psychology and sport psychology within
5
PHONE: +49(177) 8684-353 EMAILS:
ASI@EUROPE.DE
CURRENT SCIENCE
therapeutic contexts has the potential to provide significant insights and solutions for people in
both clinical and sports settings. The amalgamation of clinical psychology and athletic
psychology within therapeutic procedures is gaining significance in contemporary society. This
technique facilitates a full examination that takes into account both the individual's mental well-
being and their worries linked to performance. Moreover, the integration of clinical
psychologists and sport psychologists may serve as a means to reconcile the dichotomy between
prioritizing performance development alone and taking into account the holistic well-being of
the athlete (Drew & Morris, 2020). In the realm of sport psychology, there exists a persistent
discourse about the relative emphasis on performance improvement vs a comprehensive
approach. Nonetheless, there is merit in amalgamating clinical and sport psychology to
effectively cater to the diverse requirements of people in both clinical and athletic settings.
Nevertheless, it is essential to acknowledge that distinctions exist between applied psychology

and clinical psychology. One fundamental distinction is in the focal point of each practice.The
primary emphasis of applied psychology is in the pragmatic use of psychological concepts
within distinct contexts, such as sports or business. In contrast, clinical psychology is primarily
concerned with the evaluation, identification, and intervention for patients with psychological
problems and mental health issues. Applied psychology primarily focuses on the application of
psychological concepts to enhance performance and promote well-being within certain
domains. In contrast, clinical psychology mostly centers upon the identification and treatment
of mental health issues, with a particular emphasis on delivering therapeutic treatments to
reduce psychological discomfort.
One notable distinction between applied psychology and clinical psychology is in the requisite
training and certifications for professionals in these respective fields.Practitioners in the field
of applied psychology, such as sport psychologists, may possess particular expertise in their
respective domains, such as sports science or physical education.In contrast, clinical
psychologists undertake comprehensive training in the evaluation and management of
6
PHONE: +49(177) 8684-353 EMAILS:
ASI@EUROPE.DE
CURRENT SCIENCE
psychological illnesses, including both theoretical coursework and supervised practical
practice. The standard requirements for this program often include the attainment of a doctorate
degree in clinical psychology, the successful completion of an internship, and the acquisition
of licensing or certification to engage in independent practice.
Literature Review
Notwithstanding these distinctions, there exists a degree of convergence between applied
psychology and clinical psychology. Both disciplines acknowledge the significance of using
evidence-based procedures and solutions. Furthermore, it is noteworthy that both applied and
clinical psychology place great importance on the incorporation of research results into their
professional endeavors, with the aim of guaranteeing the provision of effective and ethically
sound therapy. Within the domain of sport psychology, there exists an increasingly
acknowledged understanding that attending to the psychological well-being of athletes may
have noteworthy effects on their performance. Hence, it is plausible for clinical psychologists
to integrate ideas derived from applied psychology in order to facilitate the enhancement of
athletes' cognitive abilities and their ability to effectively manage the stressors associated with
competitive sports (Lynch, 2021). Moreover, the differentiation between clinical and applied
sport psychology has incited scholarly discourse and deliberation over the credentials and
proficiency of professionals in these specific domains (Taylor & Schneider, 1992).
The difference between clinical and applied sport psychology has engendered scholarly
discourse and deliberation over the credentials and proficiency of professionals operating
within these diverse domains. The focal point of these disagreements often centers on the
contention that clinical psychologists may possess inadequate training in sports, while
practitioners mainly educated in physical education may lack comprehensive understanding and
practical experience in the wider psychological dimensions of dealing with athletes. The
7
PHONE: +49(177) 8684-353 EMAILS:
ASI@EUROPE.DE
CURRENT SCIENCE
disagreements often center on the contention that clinical psychologists may possess inadequate
training in sports, while practitioners solely educated in physical education may lack expertise
in the wider psychological dimensions of dealing with athletes. Nevertheless, it is essential to
acknowledge that the domain of sport psychology is undergoing continuous development,
leading to the establishment of acknowledged specializations and skill levels within the area.
Clinical sport psychologists have specialized training in several fields of psychology, including
abnormal psychology, clinical psychology, and counseling psychology (Lynch, 2021).
Professionals possess the necessary knowledge and skills to effectively manage clinical
concerns that may manifest in athletes, including but not limited to anxiety disorders and eating
disorders. Additionally, they are adept at integrating performance enhancing strategies into their
approach. Nevertheless, it is crucial to acknowledge that the domain of sport psychology is
undergoing continuous development, leading to the establishment of acknowledged
specializations and skill levels within the area. The existence of specialty and competency levels
in the domain of sport psychology has facilitated the integration of clinical and applied
psychology. The existence of specialty and competency levels in the area of sport psychology
has facilitated the integration of clinical and applied psychology. Sports psychology is a
subfield within the realm of applied psychology that seeks to facilitate the enhancement of
players' cognitive abilities and enable them to effectively manage the psychological demands
inherent in competitive sports. In the field of clinical psychology, therapeutic interventions are
primarily directed at the identification, assessment, and amelioration of mental health
conditions and disorders. Clinical psychology and applied psychology both include therapeutic
methods; yet, they differ in terms of their specific areas of emphasis and the target groups they
cater to. Clinical psychology is a specialized field that focuses on the identification and
management of mental health conditions within a clinical environment. This discipline employs
evidence-based treatment approaches, including cognitive-behavioral therapy, psychodynamic
therapy, and several other therapeutic modalities, to address these illnesses. Conversely, applied
psychology, including sport psychology as a subfield, is concerned with the use of
psychological concepts and methods to optimize performance and promote well-being across
8
PHONE: +49(177) 8684-353 EMAILS:
ASI@EUROPE.DE
CURRENT SCIENCE
many domains, including sports, education, and business (Drew & Morris, 2020). In the
domains of clinical and applied psychology, therapeutic interventions are designed to facilitate
the enhancement of people' mental well-being and overall functioning.
Within the domain of clinical psychology, therapeutic interventions include the comprehensive
evaluation, categorization, and intervention strategies used for patients afflicted with
psychological conditions.
These practices may include the administration of psychological assessments, the delivery of
individual or group psychotherapy, and the implementation of evidence-based therapies aimed
at targeting particular symptoms and enhancing overall functioning.
Within the field of sport psychology, therapeutic interventions include the collaborative efforts
undertaken with athletes to augment their cognitive abilities and maximize their overall
performance. These practices encompass various strategies such as conducting psychological
assessments to evaluate athletes' strengths and areas for growth, developing interventions to
assist athletes in coping with stress and anxiety, enhancing focus and concentration abilities,
fostering motivation and goal-setting skills, and promoting overall psychological well-being.
Furthermore, it should be noted that sport psychologists who work in the clinical domain
possess specialized training in many branches of psychology, including abnormal, clinical, and
counseling psychology. Additionally, they are required to have licensing as psychologists
(Lynch, 2021). Athletic professionals has the necessary skills and knowledge to effectively
handle both performance-related challenges and clinical issues that may emerge among athletes.
While clinical psychology and applied psychology exhibit distinct characteristics, they also
have commonalities in their treatment approaches. Both clinical and applied psychology use
evidence-based approaches to effectively meet the unique requirements of people. Furthermore,
both disciplines place significant emphasis on the need of adopting a comprehensive
perspective towards mental wellness and acknowledge the interrelatedness between cognitive
functioning and achievement. In addition, it is important to note that both clinical and applied
9
PHONE: +49(177) 8684-353 EMAILS:
ASI@EUROPE.DE
CURRENT SCIENCE
psychology acknowledge the importance of psychological testing as a means of comprehending
people' strengths, shortcomings, and areas in need of development. The use of clinical
psychology techniques within the field of applied sport psychology may provide players a more
holistic approach to their overall well-being and athletic performance (Wolanin & Marks,
2019). Nevertheless, it is crucial to acknowledge that distinctions exist between clinical
psychology and applied psychology with regards to their treatment methodologies.
The primary emphasis of applied sport psychology is in the optimization of athletic

performance and the enhancement of sport-specific mental abilities, including visualization,
goal planning, and performance self-talk.
In contrast, clinical psychology involves a wider array of therapeutic interventions with the
objective of managing mental health issues and enhancing general functioning. Clinical
psychologists use several therapeutic approaches, including cognitive-behavioral therapy,
acceptance and commitment therapy, and psychodynamic therapy, to address mental health
illnesses such as depression, anxiety disorders, and trauma. On the other hand, practitioners in
the field of applied sport psychology may integrate components of these therapeutic
methodologies, adapting them to suit the unique demands and circumstances of athletic
performance. These contrasts are indicative of the particular requirements and objectives within
each respective profession. In summary, whereas clinical psychology and applied psychology
exhibit distinctions, they exhibit overlap in terms of their treatment methodologies.
Both disciplines acknowledge the significance of evidence-based therapies, comprehensive

approaches to well-being, and the use of psychological assessment. The importance of precise
weather predictions in the contemporary dynamic global environment cannot be
overemphasized. Nevertheless, it is crucial to recognize that clinical psychology has a more
extensive purview, including a larger spectrum of mental health issues. Conversely, applied
psychology within the realm of sports largely concentrates on augmenting performance (Drew
& Morris, 2020). In summary, it can be seen that clinical psychology and applied psychology
10
PHONE: +49(177) 8684-353 EMAILS:
ASI@EUROPE.DE
CURRENT SCIENCE
exhibit variations in their treatment methodologies, however they also demonstrate
commonalities. Both disciplines acknowledge the need of customizing treatments to cater to
the individual requirements and objectives of the client, whether it pertains to enhancing mental
well-being or maximizing physical prowess within a sporting context. Applied sport
psychology is a subfield of applied psychology that focuses on the optimization of athletic
performance and the enhancement of mental abilities that are particular to sports. In contrast,
clinical psychology involves a wider array of therapeutic interventions with the objective of
managing mental health issues and enhancing general functioning. Both clinical psychology
and applied psychology place a strong emphasis on the use of evidence-based therapies. Clinical
psychologists often use several therapeutic approaches, including cognitive-behavioral therapy,
acceptance and commitment therapy, and psychodynamic therapy, in the treatment of mental
health illnesses such as depression, anxiety disorders, and trauma. On the other hand,
practitioners in the field of applied sport psychology may integrate components of these
therapeutic methodologies, but with a customized focus on the domain of athletic performance.
The aforementioned differentiation illustrates the contrasting requirements and objectives of
clinical psychology and applied sport psychology. Clinical psychology has a primary emphasis
on the holistic welfare and functioning of persons, while applied sport psychology places a
primary emphasis on optimizing performance within the realm of sports. Furthermore, it is
acknowledged by both clinical psychology and applied psychology that adopting a
comprehensive perspective towards overall well-being is crucial.
Findings
This is the comprehensive evaluation of several dimensions of an individual's existence,
including their physical well-being, social context, and individual beliefs and principles. Both
clinical psychology and applied psychology acknowledge the significance of adopting a client-
centered approach, whereby the treatment plan is developed by considering the individual's
11
PHONE: +49(177) 8684-353 EMAILS:
ASI@EUROPE.DE
CURRENT SCIENCE
objectives, values, and preferences. In summary, it can be seen that clinical psychology and
applied psychology exhibit divergent areas of emphasis and treatment methodologies, however
they also have some commonalities. Both disciplines prioritize the implementation of evidence-
based therapies and use a client-centered approach to therapy. The discipline of clinical
psychology comprises a broad spectrum of treatment approaches that are designed to address
mental health issues and enhance general functioning.
On the other hand, applied sport psychology is a specialized field that concentrates on the
optimization of physical performance and the enhancement of mental abilities within the realm
of sports.One contention within the field of applied sport psychology is that clinical
psychologists may lack the necessary training in sports, while practitioners primarily educated
in physical education may have insufficient understanding and experience in the wider
psychological elements of athletes (Taylor & Schneider, 1992). This argument underscores the
significance of fostering interdisciplinary cooperation between the fields of clinical psychology
and applied sport psychology. This partnership has the potential to provide athletes a
comprehensive range of benefits, including performance enhancing tactics as well as
scientifically educated psychological support that is specifically customized to meet the
distinctive requirements of athletes. One point of contention within the field of applied sport
psychology is on the ongoing debate over the relative merits of prioritizing performance
development vs adopting a more comprehensive and holistic approach.
This discourse revolves on the question of whether sport psychologists should exclusively
concentrate on enhancing an athlete's performance or also give precedence to their holistic well-
being.
The argument presented herein exemplifies the continuous discourse within the realm of sport
psychology pertaining to the equilibrium between augmenting performance and fostering
comprehensive well-being. Moreover, the expansion of applied sport psychology
methodologies has resulted in sport psychologists being summoned to tackle non-performance-
12
PHONE: +49(177) 8684-353 EMAILS:
ASI@EUROPE.DE
CURRENT SCIENCE
related concerns, including clinical matters (Drew & Morris, 2020). Notwithstanding these
disparities, both clinical psychology and applied sport psychology exhibit a shared objective of
fostering the welfare of people. In summary, it can be seen that clinical psychology and applied
psychology exhibit distinctions in their respective areas of concentration and therapeutic
methodologies. However, they also have commonalities in their commitment to evidence-based
therapies and the adoption of client-centered methods in the context of therapy. Both disciplines
acknowledge the significance of interdisciplinary cooperation and the possible advantages that
might arise from combining their separate knowledge and skills to provide holistic care for
people. In summary, the distinctions between applied psychology and clinical psychology are
rooted in their respective areas of emphasis and treatment methodologies.According to Taylor
and Schneider (1992), the field of applied sport psychology posits that clinical psychologists
may not possess enough expertise in the domain of sports, while practitioners solely educated
in physical education may lack comprehensive understanding of the wider psychological
dimensions relevant to athletes. Notwithstanding these disparities, both clinical psychology and
applied sport psychology have a mutual objective of improving the welfare of people. In
summary, the distinctions between applied psychology and clinical psychology are rooted in
their respective areas of emphasis and treatment methodologies. In summary, it can be seen that
clinical psychology and applied athletic psychology exhibit both commonalities and
distinctions.
Both clinical psychology and applied sport psychology have the same objective of enhancing
the overall welfare of people. However, clinical psychology encompasses a wider spectrum of
mental health concerns, while applied sport psychology concentrates particularly on optimizing
athletic performance (Drew & Morris, 2020). In general, both clinical psychology and applied
sport psychology place a significant emphasis on the welfare and mental health of people. In
the realm of therapeutic treatments, clinical psychology often encompasses a variety of
therapies, including cognitive-behavioral therapy, psychoanalysis, and humanistic approaches.
Conversely, applied sport psychology may include tactics such as goal-setting, visualization,
13
PHONE: +49(177) 8684-353 EMAILS:
ASI@EUROPE.DE
CURRENT SCIENCE
and performance strategies. Both clinical psychology and applied sport psychology have a
common emphasis on the welfare and well-being of people. In summary, it can be observed
that although applied psychology and clinical psychology diverge in terms of their distinct areas
of emphasis and treatment methodologies, they are united by a shared objective of enhancing
the welfare of humans. Both applied psychology and clinical psychology acknowledge the
significance of evidence-based therapies and client-centered methods in the context of therapy.
The user did not provide any text. Moreover, the amalgamation and cooperation between
clinical psychologists and applied sport psychologists might provide a more all-encompassing
and efficient methodology for attending to the psychological requirements of persons within
the domain of sports. The amalgamation and cooperation between clinical psychologists and
applied sport psychologists may provide a more complete and efficacious methodology in
attending to the psychological requirements of persons within the domain of sports. The
integration of clinical psychologists and applied sport psychologists in an interdisciplinary
manner may result in a comprehensive and efficient approach to addressing the psychological
requirements of athletes.
The primary distinctions between applied psychology and clinical psychology are in their
respective areas of emphasis and treatment methodologies.Applied psychology, particularly in
the field of sport psychology, is dedicated to optimizing athletic performance, while clinical
psychology encompasses a wider variety of mental health concerns. Clinical psychology
involves a diverse array of mental health concerns, including, but not exclusively limited to,
conditions such as depression, anxiety, trauma, and personality disorders. On the other hand,
applied sport psychology mostly centers its attention on the enhancement of physical
performance and the development of mental abilities in athletes.
Nevertheless, it is crucial to acknowledge that the demarcation between these two disciplines
is sometimes ambiguous. There is a growing acknowledgement within the field that the overall
welfare and psychological well-being of athletes may have a substantial influence on their
14
PHONE: +49(177) 8684-353 EMAILS:
ASI@EUROPE.DE
CURRENT SCIENCE
athletic performance. Consequently, an emerging tendency in the field of applied sport
psychology is to not only focus on improving athletic performance, but also to consider the
holistic welfare of players. The current trend towards adopting a comprehensive perspective in
the field of applied sport psychology is consistent with the fundamental ideas and
methodologies used in clinical psychology.
Clinical psychology employs a diverse array of evidence-based therapies within the realm of
therapeutic practices, including but not limited to cognitive-behavioral therapy, psychodynamic
therapy, and acceptance and commitment therapy. The aforementioned therapy activities are
designed to target the fundamental psychological concerns and enhance total mental wellness.
Conversely, the field of applied sport psychology encompasses a range of strategies and
treatments that are explicitly designed to optimize athletic performance. These strategies
include several techniques such as the use of imagery and visualization, creating goals,
engaging in self-talk, regulating arousal levels, and receiving performance feedback. Although
applied psychology and clinical psychology have distinct areas of concentration and treatment
approaches, there are also areas of convergence between the two disciplines. Both disciplines
acknowledge the significance of establishing a robust therapeutic relationship with individuals
and cultivating a secure and nurturing setting for them to delve into their cognitive and affective
experiences. Furthermore, there is an increasing acknowledgement within both disciplines of
the significance of integrating evidence-based treatments into their respective methodologies.
In general, while applied psychology and clinical psychology exhibit variations in their
respective areas of emphasis and treatment methodologies, there exists a degree of convergence
and possibility for mutual cooperation between these two disciplines. Therapeutic modalities
used in the field of clinical psychology mostly revolve on the identification, evaluation, and
intervention of psychological conditions, including but not limited to anxiety disorders, trauma-
related illnesses, and personality disorders. These methods often include the use of evidence-
based therapeutic approaches, including cognitive-behavioral therapy, psychodynamic therapy,
and acceptance and commitment therapy.
15
PHONE: +49(177) 8684-353 EMAILS:
ASI@EUROPE.DE
CURRENT SCIENCE
Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) is a very prevalent treatment modality within the field of
clinical psychology. The primary objective of this approach is to identify and alter detrimental
cognitive processes and actions that lead to psychological anguish. The primary objective of
this therapeutic approach is to facilitate the cultivation of more constructive and adaptable
cognitive patterns and behavioral responses in people. In contrast, psychodynamic therapy
delves into the realm of unconscious processes and early events that can have an impact on an
individual's present psychological challenges. The primary objective of this approach is to
facilitate the conscious recognition and understanding of latent cognitive and emotional
processes and encounters, with the ultimate goal of fostering psychological well-being and
individual development. Acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) is a frequently used
treatment modality within the field of clinical psychology.
The concept highlights the need of acknowledging challenging thoughts and feelings, while
concurrently engaging in behaviors that are consistent with an individual's own beliefs and
objectives.
Argument
Therapeutic interventions within the field of clinical psychology are primarily concerned with
equipping people with the necessary skills and methods to effectively cope with and overcome
psychological problems. These methods often include the administration of thorough
evaluations in order to get a more full comprehension of the individual's current issues and to
develop a suitable course of therapy.According to Wolanin and Marks (2019), therapy
treatments may be customized to effectively target mental health issues and enhance athletic
performance, as supported by findings in clinical psychology and sport psychology. Acceptance
and commitment therapy (ACT) is a treatment modality that has shown efficacy in addressing
16
PHONE: +49(177) 8684-353 EMAILS:
ASI@EUROPE.DE
CURRENT SCIENCE
various mental health issues. Moreover, this technique has been modified for use in the field of
sport psychology with the aim of improving athletes' performance and overall well-being.
Clinical psychology places a significant focus on research and study that is grounded on
empirical data. This practice guarantees that therapy methods are grounded in empirical data
and have shown efficacy in facilitating people' mental health improvement. In addition, clinical
psychologists often use many therapeutic techniques, including cognitive-behavioral therapy,
psychodynamic therapy, and acceptance and commitment therapy, based on the specific
requirements and objectives of each client.The primary objective of therapeutic interventions
in the field of clinical psychology is to aid people in cultivating more adaptive cognitive
processes and behaviors that are conducive to alleviating psychological distress. Additionally,
their objective is to enhance general well-being and functioning throughout all domains of life.
The commonalities between applied psychology and clinical psychology are in their mutual
objective of advancing mental health and fostering overall well-being. Nevertheless, there are
notable distinctions between the two. One notable distinction is in the fact that applied
psychology is primarily concerned with the use of psychological concepts and theories to
effectively tackle practical issues in many contexts, including but not limited to businesses,
educational institutions, and communities. In contrast, clinical psychology is a specialized field
that primarily focuses on the identification and management of mental health conditions within
a clinical environment. One notable distinction lies in the fact that clinical psychology primarily
focuses on providing assistance to persons grappling with more severe and intricate
psychological conditions. Conversely, applied psychology encompasses a wider array of
concerns that may not necessarily satisfy the requirements for a formally diagnosable mental
health disease.
In addition, the discipline of sport psychology is progressively acknowledging the significance

of attending to psychological concerns that extend outside the realm of performance
development. There is an increasing need for sport psychologists to provide assistance to
17
PHONE: +49(177) 8684-353 EMAILS:
ASI@EUROPE.DE
CURRENT SCIENCE
athletes who are grappling with psychological conditions, including anxiety, depression, and
drug addiction. The acknowledgement of this phenomenon has prompted a transition towards
a comprehensive perspective within the field of sport psychology, whereby the athlete's whole
welfare is recognized as being intricately linked to their physical prowess.To attain a
comprehensive approach, it is advisable for practitioners to contemplate the integration of
therapeutic techniques derived from clinical psychology into sport psychology therapies, as
deemed suitable. An illustration of this can be seen in the integration of evidence-based
therapeutic approaches, including acceptance and commitment therapy, cognitive-behavioral
therapy, and psychodynamic therapy, which can augment the efficacy of sport psychology
interventions. This comprehensive approach not only targets performance objectives but also
attends to the psychological well-being of athletes. Furthermore, the establishment of a
collaborative relationship between professionals in the field of sport psychology and clinical
psychology has the potential to provide advantageous outcomes by offering athletes a full range
of psychological support services (Drew & Morris, 2020). This collaborative effort may
facilitate the provision of psychological assistance to athletes that is both informed by clinical
expertise and sensitive to the unique psychological needs of athletes. It encompasses
considerations of the particular challenges posed by the athletic environment as well as the
wider psychological requirements of individual athletes. One perspective within the field of
sport psychology is that the primary emphasis should be placed on optimizing athletic
performance. Conversely, an alternative viewpoint emphasizes the significance of addressing
the athlete's welfare and acknowledging the interdependence between their mental and
emotional well-being and their athletic success. In recent times, there has been an observable
expansion in the range of applied sport psychology techniques, wherein sport psychologists are
increasingly being tasked with addressing matters outside performance-related concerns,
including clinical disorders. The Diagnostic and Statistical handbook of Mental Disorders
(DSM) is the primary diagnostic handbook used in the field of clinical psychology to provide
the criteria for diagnosing mental health disorders.
18
PHONE: +49(177) 8684-353 EMAILS:
ASI@EUROPE.DE
CURRENT SCIENCE
The distinctions and parallels between applied psychology and clinical psychology are evident
in their distinct treatment methodologies.Applied psychology and clinical psychology exhibit
commonalities as they both strive to enhance the overall welfare and operational capacity of
persons. Nevertheless, there are disparities in their respective areas of emphasis and practical
implementation.The primary emphasis of clinical psychology is in the identification and
management of mental health problems via the use of treatments and interventions that are
grounded on empirical research. In contrast, applied psychology spans a wider array of
disciplines and is focused on the pragmatic implementation of psychological concepts across
many areas, including sports, business, education, and community contexts. Within the field of
clinical psychology, customary therapeutic approaches include the use of standardized
psychological evaluations, both individual and group therapy sessions, as well as evidence-
based therapies that are tailored to target distinct mental health disorders. In contrast, the subject
of applied psychology encompasses a broader spectrum of treatment approaches, which vary
depending on the particular area of application. In the field of applied sport psychology, therapy
therapies often include performance improvement strategies, including goal-setting,
visualization, and cognitive-behavioral procedures. Furthermore, applied psychologists may
provide assistance in addressing non-performance related challenges that athletes may have,
including but not limited to stress management, confidence enhancement, and career changes.
In general, it can be observed that both applied psychology and clinical psychology share the
common objective of enhancing individuals' overall welfare. However, clinical psychology
primarily centers its attention on the identification and treatment of mental health disorders
through therapeutic interventions, whereas applied psychology emphasizes the practical
utilization of psychological principles across diverse domains.Therapeutic interventions are of
paramount importance in the field of clinical psychology, as they are essential components in
the process of diagnosing and treating mental health issues.Therapeutic techniques within the
field of clinical psychology include a comprehensive integration of evaluation, treatment, and
research methodologies. The evaluation of individuals is a crucial element within the realm of
therapeutic interventions in the field of clinical psychology. It requires the methodical
19
PHONE: +49(177) 8684-353 EMAILS:
ASI@EUROPE.DE
CURRENT SCIENCE
collecting of information about an individual's symptoms, functioning, and history to reach an
appropriate diagnosis. Therapists use a range of standardized psychological evaluations,
including interviews, questionnaires, and psychological tests, in order to gather data and assess
an individual's mental well-being. Moreover, therapy plays a pivotal role in the implementation
of therapeutic techniques within the field of clinical psychology. Therapeutic sessions may be
done either on an individual basis or within a group context, dependent upon the specific
requirements and inclinations of the client. Clinical psychologists use evidence-based therapies
during therapy sessions to assist people in addressing their unique mental health challenges.
Possible therapies that might be used include cognitive-behavioral therapy, psychodynamic
therapy, interpersonal therapy, and mindfulness-based techniques. The primary objective of
these treatment techniques is to mitigate symptoms, foster a sense of well-being, and improve
overall functioning. Moreover, conducting research plays a crucial role in the implementation
of therapeutic interventions within the field of clinical psychology.Clinical psychologists do
research in order to enhance the comprehension of mental health diseases and associated
therapeutic interventions. The researchers engage in empirical investigations, scrutinize data,
and disseminate scholarly publications with the aim of progressing the domain of clinical
psychology and facilitating the adoption of evidence-based interventions. The distinctions
between applied psychology and clinical psychology are rooted in their respective areas of
emphasis and professional contexts. Both clinical psychology and applied psychology entail
the use of psychological concepts. However, clinical psychology typically concentrates on the
identification and treatment of mental health issues. On the other hand, applied psychology
employs psychological principles in many practical areas, including but not limited to
education, counseling, and business. Moreover, clinical psychology is often conducted inside a
clinical or therapeutic environment, including settings such as hospitals, private practice
establishments, or mental health clinics. In contrast, applied psychology is evident across
diverse contexts, including educational institutions, professional environments, and
community-based entities. The use of clinical psychology has seen a growing trend in its
application towards preventative measures and treatments within various community contexts,
20
PHONE: +49(177) 8684-353 EMAILS:
ASI@EUROPE.DE
CURRENT SCIENCE
as well as in educational, counseling, legal, and public discourse arenas (Nehring & Kerrigan,
2022).Clinical psychology and applied psychology both have a shared basis in the use of
psychological concepts, information, models, and methodologies. Both of these occupations
have the same goal of delivering professional services to customers, using ethical principles
and scientific methodologies.Clinical psychology is often described as a discipline that
encompasses both scientific and artistic elements. It necessitates the use of theoretical and
practical expertise in several domains, including diagnosis, treatment, and research (Blampied,
2013). The paper asserts that clinical psychology has both scientific and artistic elements,
emphasizing the significance of evidence-based therapy as well as the clinician's own
experience in evaluating and addressing the needs of clients. Moreover, there has been a
growing emphasis in the field of clinical psychology on the integration of evidence-based
research and scholarly work to enhance the development of efficacious interventions and
therapies (Nehring & Kerrigan, 2022). In addition, it is worth noting that clinical psychology
adheres to the scientist-practitioner paradigm, a framework that underscores the amalgamation
of scientific research and therapeutic practice (Farhall, 2001). In general, the discipline of
clinical psychology is primarily concerned with the identification and intervention of mental
health conditions, while applied psychology encompasses the use of psychological concepts
within many practical contexts.
The primary distinction between clinical psychology and applied psychology is to their
respective areas of emphasis and contexts of practice.The primary emphasis of clinical
psychology rests in the identification and treatment of mental health issues. Conversely, applied
psychology encompasses the application of psychological concepts across several practical
areas, including but not limited to education, counseling, and business. Clinical psychology is
often conducted inside clinical or therapeutic environments, including hospitals, private
practice offices, and mental health clinics. In contrast, the field of applied psychology
encompasses a diverse array of contexts, including educational institutions, professional
environments, and community-based entities. Moreover, a distinction exists within the realm
21
PHONE: +49(177) 8684-353 EMAILS:
ASI@EUROPE.DE
CURRENT SCIENCE
of work between clinical psychologists and applied psychologists. Clinical psychologists
primarily operate inside healthcare environments, such as hospitals or mental health clinics,
where they provide direct therapeutic interventions to persons afflicted with psychological
illnesses.In contrast, applied psychologists have the potential to be employed in diverse
environments, depending upon their area of expertise. An instance of a professional in the field
of applied psychology, with a specialization in organizational psychology, might potentially be
employed inside a company or consulting firm, with the objective of enhancing employee
morale and productivity.
In general, despite variations in emphasis and contexts, clinical psychology and applied
psychology have a common objective of using psychological knowledge and methodologies to
enhance the welfare and functioning of persons. Moreover, it is noteworthy that both clinical
psychology and applied psychology are aligned in their objective to use ethical and scientific
methodologies within their professional endeavors. While clinical psychology and applied
psychology may vary in terms of their areas of emphasis and contextual contexts, they both
have a common objective of using ethical and scientific methodologies in their professional
endeavors.
Conclusion
Therapeutic techniques within the field of clinical psychology include the comprehensive
processes of diagnosing, treating, and preventing mental health issues.Therapeutic techniques
within the field of clinical psychology include the comprehensive processes of diagnosing,
treating, and preventing mental health issues. This is accomplished using a range of therapeutic
modalities, including cognitive-behavioral therapy, psychodynamic therapy, and mindfulness-
based therapies. The provision of these therapeutic methods is often undertaken by clinical
psychologists who have undergone specific training in the evaluation and management of
22
PHONE: +49(177) 8684-353 EMAILS:
ASI@EUROPE.DE
CURRENT SCIENCE
psychological illnesses. The primary objective of therapeutic interventions within the field of
clinical psychology is to mitigate symptoms, increase functioning, and promote the overall
well-being of persons grappling with psychological challenges. Furthermore, therapeutic
interventions within the field of clinical psychology may include the provision of support to
persons who are currently facing substantial life changes or grappling with personal difficulties.
The therapeutic approaches mentioned are grounded on empirical evidence, indicating that they
are substantiated by rigorous scientific investigation and have shown efficacy in addressing
distinct mental health disorders. In addition, therapeutic interventions within the field of clinical
psychology often use a holistic perspective, including the examination of an individual's
biological, psychological, and social determinants that influence their mental well-being. One
apparent distinction between clinical psychology and applied psychology is in their respective
areas of emphasis and contextual environments. The primary emphasis of clinical psychology
is in the evaluation and intervention of persons who are encountering mental health illnesses
within a clinical environment, including establishments like hospitals, private practices, or
mental health clinics. In contrast, applied psychology utilizes psychological ideas and
approaches to effectively tackle a diverse array of practical issues across several contexts.
Applied psychologists have the potential to engage in several professional domains, including
but not limited to education, organizational psychology, sports psychology, and community
psychology. Furthermore, it is worth noting that clinical psychology and applied psychology
share a common reliance on empirical research and interventions grounded in evidence.
However, clinical psychology places a greater emphasis on the identification, evaluation, and
therapeutic intervention of mental health disorders. On the other hand, applied psychology is
primarily concerned with the practical application of psychological principles to address real-
world issues and enhance overall functioning across different settings. In addition to the
aforementioned distinctions, it is worth noting that clinical psychology and applied psychology
also have some commonalities. Both clinical psychology and applied psychology make use of
psychological theories and research to guide their professional activities. Both disciplines also
place a high value on promoting the mental well-being and enhancing the overall functioning
23
PHONE: +49(177) 8684-353 EMAILS:
ASI@EUROPE.DE
CURRENT SCIENCE
of persons. Moreover, both clinical psychology and applied psychology place significant
emphasis on the significance of ethical practice and the need for practitioners to conform to
ethical principles and standards.Therapeutic interventions within the field of clinical
psychology play a crucial role in supporting persons who are navigating significant life changes
or grappling with personal difficulties. The aforementioned behaviors have the objective of
mitigating psychological discomfort, enhancing coping mechanisms, and promoting general
well-being.
References
Biglan, A., & Smolkowski, K. (2002, January 1). The role of the community psychologist in
the 21st century.. https://scite.ai/reports/10.1037/1522-3736.5.1.52a
Drapeau, M. (2012, November 1). Introduction to the special issue on sports and exercise
psychology.. https://scite.ai/reports/10.1037/a0030279
Drew, K., & Morris, R. (2020, December 1). Emotional reflections of an athlete referral: The
practitioner perspective. https://scite.ai/reports/10.53841/bpssepr.2020.16.2.84
Jacob, L. and Kostev , K. (2017, April 26). Workplace conflicts are associated with a higher
risk of cardiovascular disease. https://scite.ai/reports/10.3205/000249
Kottwitz, M U., Pfister, I B., Schummer, S E., Igic, I., & Otto, K. (2019, January 1). SOS—
Appreciation overboard! Illegitimacy and psychologists’ job satisfaction.
https://scite.ai/reports/10.2486/indhealth.2018-0008
Lynch, J H. (2021, December 1). Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in Elite Athletes.

https://scite.ai/reports/10.1249/jsr.0000000000000918
24
PHONE: +49(177) 8684-353 EMAILS:
ASI@EUROPE.DE
CURRENT SCIENCE
Mardon, N., Richards, H., & Martindale, A. (2016, June 1). The Effect of Mindfulness Training
on Attention and Performance in National-Level Swimmers: An Exploratory
Investigation. https://scite.ai/reports/10.1123/tsp.2014-0085
Milford, J., Austin, J L., & Smith, J E. (2007, January 1). Community reinforcement and the
dissemination of evidence-based practice: Implications for public policy..
https://scite.ai/reports/10.1037/h0100174
Minárová , M., Benčiková , D., Malá , D. and Smutný , F. (2020, January 1). Mobbing in the
Workplace and Its Negative Effect on Creating a Quality Culture.
https://scite.ai/reports/10.1051/shsconf/20207405014
Rico , N.A. V. and Gutiérrez-García , RA. (2021, May 13). Psychological impact of worker
mobbing in an automotive company in Guanajuato Mexico.
https://scite.ai/reports/10.47307/gmc.2021.129.s1.22
Steffgen , G., Sischka , P., Schmidt, AF., Kohl, D. and Happ , C. (2019, March 1). Luxembourg
Workplace Mobbing Scale. https://scite.ai/reports/10.1027/1015-5759/a000381
25
PHONE: +49(177) 8684-353 EMAILS:
ASI@EUROPE.DE
View publication stats

Differencesand Similarities Between Clinical Psychologyand Sport Psychology

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Differencesand Similarities Between Clinical Psychologyand Sport Psychology

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

Differences and Similarities Between Clinical Psychology and Sport

Article · October 2023

Bilal Semih Bozdemir

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

Differences and Similarities Between Clinical Psychology

Dr. Güçlü Metin Dökümbilek

Article Advisor: Prof. Dr. Bilal Semih Bozdemir

Our studies are in a format accredited, approved, and supported by EAALS -

Concessionaire: Tsisana Kharabadze

Prof. Sabrina Corbi

Prof. Samantha Lewes

Assoc. Prof. Osman Doruk

""• Current Science Multidisciplinary Academic Journal with

Georgia”) journal with a multi-science peer-review." (“Scientific Studies -

Georgia”) (“Scientific Studies -

Current Science Georgia”)

• The journal continues to be included in all international rankings and

(“Scientific Studies - Current Science Georgia”)

Keywords: Differences and Similarities Between Psychology Subheadings, Clinical

Nevertheless, it is essential to acknowledge that distinctions exist between applied psychology

The primary emphasis of applied sport psychology is in the optimization of athletic

Both disciplines acknowledge the significance of evidence-based therapies, comprehensive

In addition, the discipline of sport psychology is progressively acknowledging the significance

Lynch, J H. (2021, December 1). Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in Elite Athletes.

View publication stats

You might also like