Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Polygamma Function and The Derivatives of The Cotangent Function For Rationals Arguments
The Polygamma Function and The Derivatives of The Cotangent Function For Rationals Arguments
4 pte =
we ‘rlelog(t—et5IK) — (0< p<.) @)
The quantities ¢; = e?/" (j = 0,1,...,g—1) are the g-th roots of unity. Formula (2)
can be proved by developing the logarithm into its power series and summing the finite
geometric series ) exp(2rimj/q). These surns have the value q or 0 according as q is a
divisor of m or not. Setting x = p/q in the partial fraction expansion (3, No. 8.3621]
v@) = = ~L(a-ra):
and invoking Abel's continuity theorem, we may write
se jk ppt
(?) peg )
¥(2 7 lin, pla+k 14k)?
red
from which, using (2), we obtain
ol
logg + . + etiPlt og 1 — e?/2) (4)
dh =
By taking the sum of (3) and (4) and using the relation (1, No. 6.3.7]
Yl—2) = oz)+rcotxe,formula (1) follows after some trigonometric manipulation
It is the purpose of this note to derive similar formulae for higher derivatives of U(z),
ie. for the polygamma function #(*)(z) at rational arguments z = tp/q(0 < p < 4).
Using these results and functional relations for the polygamma function, we shall give
formulae for the higher derivatives of the cotangent function cot rz at z = p/q in
terms of trigonometric functions and the Bernoulli numbers, as well as formulae for
l(t), ylP(2) and yl4)(2), yl4($) in terms of the Riemann zeta function ¢(2n + 1)
and the Bernoulli numbers.
2. POLYLOGARITHMS ON THE UNIT CIRCLE
In this section, we present some relations for the n-th order polylogarithm function
Lia(z) which we shall need later. This function can be defined for |z| < 1 by its power
series expansion (11, p. 189]:
2 A
Lin(z) = x gz @m22blsy) (3)
For m = 1 and |z| <1 this series defines Li,(z) =—log(1 — z).
It is well-known (5, Sect. 23.2] that
Lin(1) = ¢(n), — Lin(-1) = (2-1) ¢(m), ©)
where ((n) is the Riemann zeta function for integer argument, and
[Bool
Bn)!”
Lin(l) = G(2a) = 5 (25)
where Byq are the even Bernoulli numbers.
‘The polylogarithms Li,(z) satisfy a number of functional relations; in particular the
so-called inversion formula (see, e.g., [9, (5.15)]), which for non-real argument : € C\R
can be written as
Lin(z) + (-1)" Lin (=) =
2
1
5 los"( ~2"*4)C(n = h) log'(—2),
where the z-plane is cut along the negative real axis, and where the logarithm is to be
taken on its principal sheet —7 < Im logz
By using (7), this formula can be written as
In particular for
is given by
log (=e?*9/*)where the term —2ri ensures that the value lies on the principal sheet. Therefore
Lin(2™/*) 4 (1) Lig (e282) = (9)
(a) Seay
(2h)!
For the polylogarithms on the unit circle, we have from (5)
Lie) = 0 seats +28 0 <9 28).
:
m he
=o
va (a2 (25 0;0 4 q S
4 pte tp aioe Liga (eile), 16
y Ce ony Gaye * x ae (6)
By setting t = | and using (14), we obtain from (15) and (16) the formulae (12) and (13)
of Theorem 1. G
We note that for p = q, formula (15) reduces to the well-known relation (11, p. 197]
a
Lin (tt) = gh 7 Lin (et),
jo
We also note that, because of the recursion formula (1, No. 6.4.6]
pL +2) —eA(z) = (-1)RRtae! (17)
and the reflection formula (1, No. 6.4.7]
a
Tapp cotns, (18)
vO 2) (-1)'¥(e) = (1)
the restriction 0 cos F (Line(e?™/*) + Line(e“?*4/9)]
=
{He-00)
42 > sin “ito (23),
=m
ot) = 0
eee +3 (1+ (AY) (1) Lines (-1)
and
G@-0) ori;
iy sin ([Cinear ("9") — Ling (7
2
22) cos Bones (2
ia
From these two formulae we obtain
yen (-2) = yee (?) =
7 Li
(0)
ee-n(2)"- 4(2k — 1g? x sitand hence, by subtracting these results from (23) and using (6) the formulae (19) and
(20) of Theorem 2. 0
We note that the formulae (21) and (22) for y'(p/q) and ¥"(p/q) are very similar
in their structure to formula (1) for Y(p/q). In contrast to this formula, however, they
contain two functions, Cla(z) and Cls(z), which are not elementary.
These results enable us to eliminate from (19) and (20) the term involving higher
derivatives of the cotangent function. This is done in
Theorem 3: Let k,p,q EN. Then, for0 1 expressions of the same type can be
obtained by differentiation.
Even for the simplest case k = 1 of (26) and (27), this procedure is tedious, and not
only because the trigonometric sums have to be handled separately for odd and even ¢.
Therefore, at least for small values of k, it is more convenient to use the formulae of
Theorem 2.
4/ HIGHER DERIVATIVES OF cot rz aT 2 = p/q
Although the cotangent function cot 2 is elementary, constructing expressions for its
higher derivatives is tedious and not very transparent. Heuristically, it is not difficult to
7see that
dz"
cotz = (—1)"P,(cot z),
where P, is a polynomial of degree n +1, but finding the coefficients is more involved.
Recently, Hoffman [7] has solved this problem by giving the recursion formula
Pails) = EGA.
(n2 1),
where Po(u) =u, Pi(u) =u? 1 and w= cota.
In this section we shall give explicit expressions for the values of the higher derivatives
of cot mz for the particular case of rational values z = p/q(0 0 in terms of Bernoulli numbers, Euler numbers, the Riemann zeta
function for odd integer arguments, and the related series of reciprocal powers of integers
A(m), of which G = A(2) is a special case [10].
Because Cla(21) is apparently not known in terms of well-known constants, it is not
possible to find (4) from (21) in terms of such constants. Lewin (11, p. 104] notes
that, though Cl,(2z) = 2 Clo(4x), it does not seem possible to evaluate these two values
separately. Relations between Cla(4x), Clo(37) and (in), o'(2x) etc. are given by
Grosjean (6]. Relations of a similar type for other arguments can also be found in de
Doelder (3]
We now present tid formulae which express (4)(4), wl#)(2) and w(4), pls)
in terms of well-known constants.‘Theorem 5: For all k EN,
up (2K) (1
{yeogy} Feomr{ - 0% -2y¢24-4 (04)
(2k) (A
(Font = geo{ == 6" corey (35)
+1 (SUPA BM as oy po2t ake [Baal
Dye may” FOR FD) By
Proof: From (20) and (18) we obtain
(em) ee
i
#5v3
— (2K)! 3* (62k + 1) + Claeaa(3x)}
ems > Fy geen)
wen a
oe eens
{ents ote ev
= (2k)! 6% {(2
7#)¢ (2k +1) + Clasia($) — Clesa(3x)}
Using (11, p. 198]
Chara(Se) = 31-2) 3-*)C2k-+ 1),
Chaier(3r) = —$(1-3-7)¢(2k +1),
together with (31), yields the result as stated in Theorem 5. Q
We may add here that the sums over A in (34) and (35) are the coefficients in the
power series expansion for 3sin 2/ sin 3x and 3(sinz+sin2z)/ sin 3x, respectively. It does
not seem possible to obtain these coefficients in a simpler form
In particular we have
¥"(3) = -266(3) - $v3x9,
wend) = —2904¢(5) -
wh) = —7186960¢(7) - 48.35",
and
w"(3) = —182¢(3) —4v3n°,
wold) = -90024¢(5) — 176 V3x°,
wO(L) = —99943920¢(7) — 19264V 3x"
For reasons of completeness, we mention that according to (1),
in3 — LV3x,
2—81n3 - 3V3:
10Note that the term containing V3 in these equations can be obtained by setting k = 0 in
the corresponding terms in (34) and (35). Here again, the values obtained from Theorem
5 can be used to calculate "(f+ n), WOAN(2 + n), YOM(E +n) and YPM(S + n) for
nENo.
‘We mention briefly the case p = 1, 9 =
wd) = (2+ V2)x? +166 +8V2 [Ch(tn) + Ch(3x)].
. From (21) we have
It does not seem possible to eliminate the Clausen functions in this formula, Grosjean (6)
gives
(Gag) = & [e204 vast ate e277, 6),
but substituting these expressions yields a vanishing identity.
From (22) we have
v"( =? — 2246(3) ~ 12802 (Cls(47) — Cls(2x)] .
Here again, an expression for Cla(}x) —Cla($x) in terins of other constants does not seem
to be known.
1) = -2443v9)
6. SPECIAL CASES FOR THE HIGHER DERIVATIVS OF cot xz AT z = p/q
We now discuss some examples of Theorem.4 for special,values p,q and arbitrary k.
We note that the'right-hand sides of (28) to (31) must be invariant under the substitution
Pp — 7p, q — rq where r € N. It is therefore possible to restrict p and q to pairs p,q
with ged(p, q) = 1. Further, it follows from the properties of the sine and cosine functions
that, up to a change of sign in the case of even derivatives, it is sufficient to consider, for
given q, only those values of p for which 2p You might also like