You are on page 1of 16
CERN / Computing and Networks D CN/96/5 February 1996 Amended: June 1996 The Polygamma Function and the Derivatives of the Cotangent Function for Rational Arguments KS. Kélbig ABSTRACT. Using properties of the polylogarithm function Lis(=) at the q-th root of unity and on the unit circle, the polygamma function w()(z) for ratio- aal arguments 2 = -tp/q (0 < p < q) is expressed in several ways in terms of these functions, the trigonometric functions, the n-th order Clausen functions Cl,(z) and the Bernoulli numbers. Using properties of c'(z), the higher derivatives of the cotangent function cot rz at x = p/q are expressed as finite sums involving trigonometric functions and Bernoulli numbers. Formulae for BONE), GANZ) and wl*l(L), HOH) in terms of the Riemann zeta function (2a +1) and the Bernoulli numbers are also given. 1. INTRODUCTION It is well-known that the digamma function Y(z) = dlog I'(z)/dz can be expressed, for rational arguments x = p/g, in terms of elementary functions [5, No. 8.3636]: A=! © 2 »(2) = 7 logy Foot 42 YY oe MDP iogsin () a 2 > fa (2.¢ EN, 0 4 pte = we ‘rlelog(t—et5IK) — (0< p<.) @) The quantities ¢; = e?/" (j = 0,1,...,g—1) are the g-th roots of unity. Formula (2) can be proved by developing the logarithm into its power series and summing the finite geometric series ) exp(2rimj/q). These surns have the value q or 0 according as q is a divisor of m or not. Setting x = p/q in the partial fraction expansion (3, No. 8.3621] v@) = = ~L(a-ra): and invoking Abel's continuity theorem, we may write se jk ppt (?) peg ) ¥(2 7 lin, pla+k 14k)? red from which, using (2), we obtain ol logg + . + etiPlt og 1 — e?/2) (4) dh = By taking the sum of (3) and (4) and using the relation (1, No. 6.3.7] Yl—2) = oz)+rcotxe, formula (1) follows after some trigonometric manipulation It is the purpose of this note to derive similar formulae for higher derivatives of U(z), ie. for the polygamma function #(*)(z) at rational arguments z = tp/q(0 < p < 4). Using these results and functional relations for the polygamma function, we shall give formulae for the higher derivatives of the cotangent function cot rz at z = p/q in terms of trigonometric functions and the Bernoulli numbers, as well as formulae for l(t), ylP(2) and yl4)(2), yl4($) in terms of the Riemann zeta function ¢(2n + 1) and the Bernoulli numbers. 2. POLYLOGARITHMS ON THE UNIT CIRCLE In this section, we present some relations for the n-th order polylogarithm function Lia(z) which we shall need later. This function can be defined for |z| < 1 by its power series expansion (11, p. 189]: 2 A Lin(z) = x gz @m22blsy) (3) For m = 1 and |z| <1 this series defines Li,(z) =—log(1 — z). It is well-known (5, Sect. 23.2] that Lin(1) = ¢(n), — Lin(-1) = (2-1) ¢(m), ©) where ((n) is the Riemann zeta function for integer argument, and [Bool Bn)!” Lin(l) = G(2a) = 5 (25) where Byq are the even Bernoulli numbers. ‘The polylogarithms Li,(z) satisfy a number of functional relations; in particular the so-called inversion formula (see, e.g., [9, (5.15)]), which for non-real argument : € C\R can be written as Lin(z) + (-1)" Lin (=) = 2 1 5 los"( ~2"*4)C(n = h) log'(—2), where the z-plane is cut along the negative real axis, and where the logarithm is to be taken on its principal sheet —7 < Im logz By using (7), this formula can be written as In particular for is given by log (=e?*9/*) where the term —2ri ensures that the value lies on the principal sheet. Therefore Lin(2™/*) 4 (1) Lig (e282) = (9) (a) Seay (2h)! For the polylogarithms on the unit circle, we have from (5) Lie) = 0 seats +28 0 <9 28). : m he =o va (a2 (25 0;0 4 q S 4 pte tp aioe Liga (eile), 16 y Ce ony Gaye * x ae (6) By setting t = | and using (14), we obtain from (15) and (16) the formulae (12) and (13) of Theorem 1. G We note that for p = q, formula (15) reduces to the well-known relation (11, p. 197] a Lin (tt) = gh 7 Lin (et), jo We also note that, because of the recursion formula (1, No. 6.4.6] pL +2) —eA(z) = (-1)RRtae! (17) and the reflection formula (1, No. 6.4.7] a Tapp cotns, (18) vO 2) (-1)'¥(e) = (1) the restriction 0

cos F (Line(e?™/*) + Line(e“?*4/9)] = {He-00) 42 > sin “ito (23), =m ot) = 0 eee +3 (1+ (AY) (1) Lines (-1) and G@-0) ori; iy sin ([Cinear ("9") — Ling (7 2 22) cos Bones (2 ia From these two formulae we obtain yen (-2) = yee (?) = 7 Li (0) ee-n(2)"- 4(2k — 1g? x sit and hence, by subtracting these results from (23) and using (6) the formulae (19) and (20) of Theorem 2. 0 We note that the formulae (21) and (22) for y'(p/q) and ¥"(p/q) are very similar in their structure to formula (1) for Y(p/q). In contrast to this formula, however, they contain two functions, Cla(z) and Cls(z), which are not elementary. These results enable us to eliminate from (19) and (20) the term involving higher derivatives of the cotangent function. This is done in Theorem 3: Let k,p,q EN. Then, for0 1 expressions of the same type can be obtained by differentiation. Even for the simplest case k = 1 of (26) and (27), this procedure is tedious, and not only because the trigonometric sums have to be handled separately for odd and even ¢. Therefore, at least for small values of k, it is more convenient to use the formulae of Theorem 2. 4/ HIGHER DERIVATIVES OF cot rz aT 2 = p/q Although the cotangent function cot 2 is elementary, constructing expressions for its higher derivatives is tedious and not very transparent. Heuristically, it is not difficult to 7 see that dz" cotz = (—1)"P,(cot z), where P, is a polynomial of degree n +1, but finding the coefficients is more involved. Recently, Hoffman [7] has solved this problem by giving the recursion formula Pails) = EGA. (n2 1), where Po(u) =u, Pi(u) =u? 1 and w= cota. In this section we shall give explicit expressions for the values of the higher derivatives of cot mz for the particular case of rational values z = p/q(0

0 in terms of Bernoulli numbers, Euler numbers, the Riemann zeta function for odd integer arguments, and the related series of reciprocal powers of integers A(m), of which G = A(2) is a special case [10]. Because Cla(21) is apparently not known in terms of well-known constants, it is not possible to find (4) from (21) in terms of such constants. Lewin (11, p. 104] notes that, though Cl,(2z) = 2 Clo(4x), it does not seem possible to evaluate these two values separately. Relations between Cla(4x), Clo(37) and (in), o'(2x) etc. are given by Grosjean (6]. Relations of a similar type for other arguments can also be found in de Doelder (3] We now present tid formulae which express (4)(4), wl#)(2) and w(4), pls) in terms of well-known constants. ‘Theorem 5: For all k EN, up (2K) (1 {yeogy} Feomr{ - 0% -2y¢24-4 (04) (2k) (A (Font = geo{ == 6" corey (35) +1 (SUPA BM as oy po2t ake [Baal Dye may” FOR FD) By Proof: From (20) and (18) we obtain (em) ee i #5v3 — (2K)! 3* (62k + 1) + Claeaa(3x)} ems > Fy geen) wen a oe eens {ents ote ev = (2k)! 6% {(2 7#)¢ (2k +1) + Clasia($) — Clesa(3x)} Using (11, p. 198] Chara(Se) = 31-2) 3-*)C2k-+ 1), Chaier(3r) = —$(1-3-7)¢(2k +1), together with (31), yields the result as stated in Theorem 5. Q We may add here that the sums over A in (34) and (35) are the coefficients in the power series expansion for 3sin 2/ sin 3x and 3(sinz+sin2z)/ sin 3x, respectively. It does not seem possible to obtain these coefficients in a simpler form In particular we have ¥"(3) = -266(3) - $v3x9, wend) = —2904¢(5) - wh) = —7186960¢(7) - 48.35", and w"(3) = —182¢(3) —4v3n°, wold) = -90024¢(5) — 176 V3x°, wO(L) = —99943920¢(7) — 19264V 3x" For reasons of completeness, we mention that according to (1), in3 — LV3x, 2—81n3 - 3V3: 10 Note that the term containing V3 in these equations can be obtained by setting k = 0 in the corresponding terms in (34) and (35). Here again, the values obtained from Theorem 5 can be used to calculate "(f+ n), WOAN(2 + n), YOM(E +n) and YPM(S + n) for nENo. ‘We mention briefly the case p = 1, 9 = wd) = (2+ V2)x? +166 +8V2 [Ch(tn) + Ch(3x)]. . From (21) we have It does not seem possible to eliminate the Clausen functions in this formula, Grosjean (6) gives (Gag) = & [e204 vast ate e277, 6), but substituting these expressions yields a vanishing identity. From (22) we have v"( =? — 2246(3) ~ 12802 (Cls(47) — Cls(2x)] . Here again, an expression for Cla(}x) —Cla($x) in terins of other constants does not seem to be known. 1) = -2443v9) 6. SPECIAL CASES FOR THE HIGHER DERIVATIVS OF cot xz AT z = p/q We now discuss some examples of Theorem.4 for special,values p,q and arbitrary k. We note that the'right-hand sides of (28) to (31) must be invariant under the substitution Pp — 7p, q — rq where r € N. It is therefore possible to restrict p and q to pairs p,q with ged(p, q) = 1. Further, it follows from the properties of the sine and cosine functions that, up to a change of sign in the case of even derivatives, it is sufficient to consider, for given q, only those values of p for which 2p

You might also like