Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A
very important parameter
for the cycle length of a S Sulphur
Vanadium
hydroprocessing unit is
Nickel
the deactivation rate of the Aromatic rings S
installed catalyst. The deactiva- Naphthenic rings
tion of a hydrotreating catalyst
S S
can be coke induced and
contaminant induced. Coke
S
deposition is to a large extent S
controlled, but also dictated, by S
the unit operating regime
S
(temperature, hydrogen availa- S S
1/ in
analytical tools for characteris-
TK-30 TK-335 TK-437 TK-337 TK-41 TK-831
8
ing spent catalysts. ICP-MS,
1/ in QL
10
TK-455
TK-31 TK-339 Multi- TK-341 TK-743 TK-453
X-ray fluorescence, X-ray
Trap diffraction and state-of-the-art
1/ in QL TK-340 TK-49 microscopy are within the range
15
of possibilities.
Activity The first thing in the toolbox
is always to characterise the
Figure 3 Haldor Topsoe’s graded bed products spent catalyst using a precise
bulk analysis method. An exact
Retrieving spent catalyst samples quantification of what is present in the sample is
It is essential to have access to relevant and required. The most efficient method to apply for
representative spent catalyst samples if a detailed this purpose is
understanding of contamination type, degree and inductive coupled plasma mass spectrometry
profile is to be obtained. Because the contamina- (ICP-MS).
tion process is difficult to simulate in a realistic Scanning electron microscope (SEM) and elec-
manner in lab-scale pilot units, almost all devel- tron micro probe analyser (EMPA) are tools
opment work for making new, improved guard used to determine the chemical composition in
catalysts relies on retrieving industrially aged localised areas of solid materials. The method is
spent catalysts. One option is to sample catalyst ideal for a combination of structural and chemi-
while the industrial reactor is being unloaded. cal information. An electron beam interacts with
This obviously gives valuable information about the sample and produces electrons both for
the contamination profile and illuminates how imaging and characteristic X-rays. Both the
well certain contaminants migrate through the energy and the wave length of the X-rays can be
different catalyst layers. The best way to get good detected.
samples is to unload the catalyst by vacuuming.
However, if the catalyst is being dumped through The strength of canisters and spent catalyst
a bottom dump chute it is not possible to identify analyses
the exact position of the catalyst that is being Topsoe installed canisters in a hydrotreater
sampled. The catalyst unloaded by gravity designed to process and upgrade spent lube oils
through a dump tube will funnel out like grains to base oils and group 2+ lubes. Spent lube oil
emptying from a silo. Alternatively, we recom- contains large amounts of contaminants and
mend using Petroval’s sampling method called additives, such as zinc, magnesium, calcium and,
Probacat, which will drill down through the bed in particular, phosphorus and silicon. All of these
and a set of perfect core samples of the bed is contaminants deposit on catalysts, causing signifi-
collected. cant loss of activity. Two canisters were installed
The other option is to have catalyst test baskets in the top of the reactor with catalysts having
or canisters installed in a known location within different properties (pore volume, pore size,
the reactor during the entire cycle. The canister surface area and active metal content). Besides
will hold several catalysts in different compart- the canisters, catalyst samples were also obtained
ments, and each catalyst within the canister is from the unloading of the three reactors. Some of
exposed to practically the same type and amount the unloaded catalyst samples had been in opera-
of contaminants. In collaboration with clients, tion for one cycle and other samples had been in
Topsoe installs 10-20 test canisters in various the reactor for two cycles.
Si
2 cycles
Analysis by SEM and EDS P
Now it was time to apply the
1 cycle
SEM technique to map and
quantify exactly where the 1 cycle
contaminants were present.
Figures 6 to 8 show the quantita-
tive cross-section analyses of
TK-562 BRIM, TK-831 and
TK-743 using the SEM/EDS
technique. These catalysts were
all grabbed from different loca- TK-831,1/8in R TK-743,1/10in QL TK-562,1/16in TL
tions in the reactor and represent
a bulk catalyst, a graded bed Figure 5 Bulk analyses for Si and P: samples from the catalyst bed (ICP-MS)
catalyst and an effective HDM
catalyst. Hence, the last two mentioned have the within the catalyst pellet than was the case for
biggest pore systems and the largest pores. TK-562 BRIM. The crust itself is again very rich
A firm crust of phosphorus is seen on the in phosphorus, silicon and the other
surface of the main bed catalyst pellet. The phos- contaminants.
phorus content in the crust exceeds 15 wt% and The data shows a good correlation between the
silicon is around 10 wt%. In fact, the crust catalyst’s porosity and pore size and its ability to
appears to be a complex matrix of the impurities allow phosphorus and silicon compounds to
of the spent lube oil as it also contains high enter the catalyst pore system. This data as well
amounts of calcium, magnesium and zinc. The as dozens of other similar canister studies has
two measurements made within the catalyst pellet enabled Haldor Topsoe to generate optimised
show a steep drop in the phosphorus content, catalysts designed to pick up the specific poisons
whereas silicon is fairly constant at all points. causing issues in each individual hydrotreating
Looking at the TK-831 and TK-743 samples, unit, resulting in a better performance and cycle
there is a significant difference. While they also length. The graded bed system needs to be
have a crust layer surrounding them, the crust is designed for each unit to effectively eliminate
thinner and, more importantly, the phosphorus unit constraints.
species are found in much higher concentrations
Catalyst 8 42.6 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 26.7 10.0 2.5 6.3 7.7 <0.5 0.0 0.2 2.4 0.0 0.6
wt%
OK NaK MgK AsL AlK SiK PK MoL SK CaK VK FeK CoK NiK ZnK
1 33.0 2.8 1.0 0.9 0.7 10.9 23.4 3.7 0.7 25.7 0.0 2.3 0.0 0.5 5.9
Catalyst 2 51.7 5.2 1.0 <0.5 <0.5 3.5 18.0 <0.5 2.2 8.9 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.6 2.4
3 30.5 0.8 <0.5 <0.5 23.5 4.1 14.4 0.7 3.0 <0.5 0.0 <0.5 0.0 1.4 <0.5
Crust 4 42.2 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 26.1 4.7 18.3 2.7 2.5 <0.5 0.0 <0.5 0.0 1.3 0.7
5 44.4 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 27.4 5.2 14.9 2.1 2.4 <0.5 0.0 <0.5 0.0 1.5 0.6
6 52.9 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 24.0 5.8 11.5 1.6 1.8 <0.5 0.0 <0.5 0.0 1.1 <0.5
Catalyst
wt%
OK NaK MgK AsL AlK SiK PK MoL SK CaK VK FeK CoK NiK ZnK
1 33.7 3,7 1.0 0.0 0.7 5.2 14.9 0.0 8.6 14.5 0.5 1.2 0.0 0.5 14.2
Catalyst 2 48.0 4.4 0.9 0.5 2.3 4.9 12.8 0.0 6.6 10.8 <0.5 0.7 0.0 <0.5 7.3
3 47.7 1.5 <0.5 <0.5 21.4 4.3 10.5 2.7 5.0 2.7 <0.5 0.6 0.0 1.7 0.8
Crust 4 51.2 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 25.3 4.0 8.4 3.6 4.3 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.0 1.8 <0.5
5 48.7 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 29.3 4.5 7.3 2.7 4.2 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.0 1.8 0.6
6 46.0 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 32.9 5.1 6.4 3.2 4.0 <0.5 <0.5 <0.5 0.0 1.5 <0.5
Catalyst wt%