You are on page 1of 3
ARON, ALEXA ME(R M ROW PR-Ot Bs ARCHITECTURE 2 08/19/2024 “(ere Neer FAcr—+)” THERMAL COMFORT THERMAL COMFORT REPERS TO A STATE OF MINY WHERE INVIVIPUALS ARE 5A- TNOPiEP WITH THE THERMAL ENVIRONMENT THEY AKE IN. IT ISVEPINEV A? A RANGE OP CLIMATIC CONPTIONS THAT 70 NOT CAUSE THERMAL VISCOMPORT. FACTORS SUCH AS BOVY TEMPERATURE, SKIN MOISTURE, AN TEMPERATURE REGULATION EPTORTS INFLUENCE THERMAL COMFORT. COMBINATIONS OF AIK TEMPERATURE, RELATIVE HUMIVTTY, AIK MOTION, AN/MEAN KAPIANT TEMPERATURE PETERMINE THE COMPORT ZONE, WHILE FACTORS LIKE CULTURE, HEALTH, CLOTHING,ANI? PHYSICAL. ACTIVITY APFECT INDIVIVUAL COMFORT PREFERENCES FROVIFING CONTROLS ANT MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT ALLOWS OCCUPANTS TO CREATE THEIR TRATEREY THER ~ MAL CONPITIONS. THE VIMOMFORT ZONE VARIES ACEOSS VITFCRENT CUMATES, MAKING THE COMTORTZONE THE VEAREV COOL TOK GULPINGTHEEMAL (ESIGN TUE TO TS Hit LEVEL OF ACCEPTANCE AMONG FEOFLE: THE AMOUNT OF HEAT QUE BOVY PROTUCET 6 INFLUENCEP BY THE EXTERNAL TEM® EZATURE ANPOUR LEVEL OF ACTIVITY AS STATEVIN THE BOOK OF LECHNEK (2014), ACTIVE PEOPLE GENERATE APPROXIMATELY EIGHTTIMES MORE EAT THAN SOME - ONE WHO IS ZECLINING. IN ORVER TO MAINTAIN EQUILIBRIUM , OUF BOY MUSTLOE HEAT ATTHE SAME KATE (TIS TROVUCEY. THIS COMTELS THE USE OF APVTIONAL ME- ASURES TO TROVIVE BAKKICES AGAINST HEAT LOss IN THE FAST, SOLUTIONS SUCH AG CANOPY BEV ANY PNEUMATIC STRUCTURES WERE THOUGHT OF TO ENHANCE COMFORT. OVERTIME, CLOTHING ANP BULPINGS WERE VE - VELOPED TO CEDATE A MORE MOPETATE ENVIKONMENT THAT ALLOWS SKIN/ SU~- PFICIENTSKIN EXPOQURE WHILE STILL PEOVIVING COMTORT. 4 ENVIRONMENTAL CONPITIONS THERMAL COMFORT ENCOMrASSES MOZE THAN JUST HEAT TISSIPATION MECHANISMS. IT ALGO INVOLVES POUF ENVIRONMENTAL CON- aa Ly VITIONS THAT FACUTATE HEATLOSS! Alc TEMP Con VECION. ciinemon ERATURE (MEAGUFED IN TARENHETT ANT CEL ot Wem nay SiUs), ZELATIVE HUMIVITY, AZ MOVEMENT ( ME- SSS YEE,

You might also like