Professional Documents
Culture Documents
30 March 2023
Background
Body composition is used in health and fitness to characterize the percentages of fat,
bone, and muscle in human bodies. The body fat percentage is of particular significance since it
may be quite useful in determining an individual's health and health problems that can occur in
the future. Those problems include type two diabetes, high blood pressure, and cardiovascular
disease. Body composition is also one of the five components of fitness. Body composition is
important to assess for health care workers and individuals for these reasons: working and
looking to develop fitness, understanding the subject to help take care of health, monitoring fat-
to-muscle ratio, and observing a high-fat percentage that can lead to cardiovascular disease.
First, assessing body composition is critical for people trying to improve their fitness.
Unlike a BMI calculator, which cannot distinguish between fat and muscle mass, a body
composition test can properly determine the amount of fat, lean muscle, and water in your body.
Next, the ability to track measurements as you lose weight or gain muscle is very important in
planning your workout routine and attaining optimum performance. The more you know about
your body composition, the easier it is to create a strategy. Following that, understanding your
body composition will assist you in avoiding losing too much fat, which can also create
difficulties for your health. Losing weight too quickly may raise your risk of complications such
as muscle loss, decreased metabolism, vitamin shortages, and a variety of other risks. Finally,
understanding your body composition is critical for good health. It is widely acknowledged that
having too much body fat can pose severe health concerns, resulting in issues such as high blood
pressure, heart disease, type 2 diabetes, and a variety of other illnesses. Body composition is vital
in evaluating your health and fitness since it distinguishes between leanness and excess fat. This
enables you to analyze your health correctly and adjust your lifestyle and nutrition accordingly.
Griffin 3
Data
Name: Makenzie Griffin Age: 20 Sex: Female Height: 67 inches Weight: 258 lbs
Body 3-17-23 29% 20th %ile; Poor for age and sex Moderate: Administrator was not very
Composition (table 3.5, p. 74) confident when it came to marking my
(Sydney) body and pinching my skin. It was one of
her first tests and she was light with her
pinches
Body 3-17-23 36% 5th %ile; Very poor for age and High: Administrator accurately marked
Composition sex (table 3.5, p.74) my body, pinched to wear he did not grab
(Dan) muscle, and his calculations were
accurate
BIA 3-17-23 50% > 1st %ile; Very poor for age High: Administrator accurately tested for
Sydney and sex (table 3.5, p. 74) height and weight and in return, put in
Kanuch those accurate values into the Tanita
scale. Very little room for human error
BIA 3-17-23 50% > 1st %ile; Very poor for age High: Administrator accurately tested for
(Dan) and sex (table 3.5, p. 74) height and weight and in return, put in
those accurate values into the Tanita
scale. Very little room for human error
Waist 3-17-23 113.5 cm Very high for sex High: Administrator made sure the tape
Circumference (table 3.2, p. 67) was horizontal and the tension was not
(Sydney) too tight for both trials
Waist 3-17-23 110 cm Very high for sex High: Administrator made sure the tape
Circumference (table 3.2, p.67) was horizontal and the tension was not
(Dan) too tight for both trials
BMI 3-17-23 67 inches or Obesity class III for sex and High: Administrator was very accurate
(Sydney) 170.2 cm extremely high risk for disease with measuring my height and weight and
263 lbs or relative to normal weight and double-checked calculations to be sure of
119.3 kg waist circumference accurate results
41.18 kg/m2 (table 3.1, p. 64)
BMI 3-17-23 67 inches or Obesity class III for sex and High: Administrator was very accurate
(Dan) 170.18 cm extremely high risk for disease with measuring my height and weight and
265.2 lbs or relative to normal weight and double-checked calculations to be sure of
120.54 lbs waist circumference accurate results
41.27 kg/m2 (table 3.1, p. 64)
Sources Used in Background and Data Table:
American College of Sports Medicine. (2022). ACSM’s Guidelines for Exercise Testing and
Prescription (11th ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Griffin 4
For variability in my body fat percentage, the values within the different tests were
relatively close to each other, except for the skinfold tests, but other than that, I believe that to be
accurate. With my BIA and BMI results, the two administrators ran the tests on me on the same
day. Because of this, my height and weight were relatively the same for both trials and in return
gave BIA results that were both 50% and BMI results that were about 41 kg/m2. The same
process goes for the waist circumference values. The two administrators ran the tests on me on
the same day and because of this, my waist circumference did not change in that small amount of
time. The values were relatively close together. With the values for the skinfold tests run on me,
those values were not as close together. I believe this is because the administrator was not
confident in the procedure and was too afraid to pinch me. Because of this, she did not grab my
skin hard enough and got smaller values when compared to the other administrator that tested me
and got a more accurate measurement. The two values received were 29% body fat for the more
inaccurate test and 36% body fat for the more accurate test.
In my opinion, I believe that the BIA test would be the more accurate body composition
test to run on an obese client. This is because there is less source of error when measuring an
individual's height and weight and in return, there is even less source of error when it comes to
inputting those values into the Tanita scale. For an individual that is very lean and muscular, I
would use the skinfold test and waist circumference test. With the skinfold test, because the
individual is lean and muscular, their body fat is more distributed throughout their body; it is
easier to get a more accurate reading on the different sites on their body. With the waist
circumference test, because the individual is lean, they have a more defined small circumference
Learning
Personally, the seven-site skinfold test was the most difficult test for me to run in this
module. Before I got a true understanding of how to perform the test accurately, there were quite
a few things I performed incorrectly, and it shows in the observations I received. First, I would
fold certain sites incorrectly, specifically the chest and suprailiac sites. Before I understood what
measuring perpendicular to the skinfold and body surface meant, I would just clamp the skin
how I thought it should go. In return, I did not meet the criteria for that section, and I agreed with
the observer’s comments. After I received those comments, I learned from them and performed
more accurate tests on other clients in the future. There was one time when I forgot to ask my
client’s hydration status before allowing them to step on the Tanita scale and in return, I did not
meet the criteria for that section. After that one time, I never forgot to ask a client about their
hydration status again and I agreed with the comment my observer gave to me. Finally, when I
was first starting to run my tests, I was not confident in the procedure, especially the skinfold
tests. I was not the best at explaining the procedures and purposes of running the tests to the
client and my observer made note of that. I asked her how I could better myself in that category
and she gave me some great tips and helped me to better understand the lab and better myself.
For this module, testing non-exercise science students was a lot more difficult. This is
because today, there is a so-called “perfect body” and not everybody has that. Also, it is
obviously not thrilling to hear that you are an obese individual even if you know you exercise
frequently and eat relatively healthily. When asking around to friends if I could test them, they
were relatively hesitant because they did not want other people to see them without a shirt and
did not want to know their values. It was even difficult for me to test non-exercise science majors