You are on page 1of 2

Ia. Ib.

This passage is from John Locke's "Two Treatises of Government," and it discusses the concept In this passage from John Locke's "The Second Treatise of Government," Locke discusses the concept of
of the state of nature and the origins of political power. Here's a breakdown of the key points: the state of nature and the origins of political power. Let's break it down:

1. State of Nature: Locke begins by describing the "state of nature." In this state, all people 1. The State of Nature: Locke begins by talking about the "state of nature." In this state, individuals are
free and equal. They have the liberty to govern themselves and their possessions without relying on the
have complete freedom to control their actions, possessions, and bodies. They are not subject
will of others. No one has more power than another in this natural state.
to the will of any other person. Everyone is equal, and no one has more power or authority
than another. 2. Punishing Offenses: Locke argues that in this state, everyone has the power to punish offenses against
the law of nature as they see fit, based on their judgment of what is right and reasonable. In other words,
2. Equality: Locke emphasizes the natural equality of all individuals. Since they are created by they have the executive power of the law of nature.
the same omnipotent and wise maker, share similar faculties, and are meant to fulfill their
roles in the world, there should be no inherent subordination or domination of one person 3. Right to Seek Reparation: When someone harms another person, the injured party has not only the
right to punish the offender but also the right to seek reparation for the harm they've suffered.
over another.
4. Authority of Magistrates: Locke explains that in civil society (as opposed to the state of nature),
3. Law of Nature: Locke introduces the concept of the "law of nature." This law, guided by
magistrates or governing authorities have the common right to punish offenders to maintain order and
reason, teaches that people should not harm each other in their life, health, liberty, or prevent crimes. They can sometimes remit punishment for the common good. However, they cannot
possessions. It is the foundation for mutual love and duties toward one another. remit the right of an injured individual to seek reparation.

4. Limitations on Liberty: While individuals in the state of nature have liberty, it is not absolute 5. The Right of Self-Defense and the Right of Punishment: Locke emphasizes that the right to punish is
license. People cannot use their liberty to harm themselves or others unless there's a greater based on the principle of self-defense, protecting oneself from harm. The offender has essentially
purpose than mere self-preservation. declared "war" against all of humanity through their unjust actions, so others have the right to punish
them. This is the foundation for the principle, "Whoever sheds man's blood, by man shall his blood be
5. Preservation of Others: In the state of nature, individuals should, as much as possible, not shed."
only protect themselves but also ensure the well-being of others unless it comes into conflict
6. Punishment for Lesser Offenses: Locke also notes that even lesser breaches of the law of nature can be
with their self-preservation. This means they should not harm others and should protect their
punished in the state of nature, proportionate to the offense. The goal is to discourage offenders, make
life, liberty, health, and property. them repent, and deter others from committing similar offenses.
6. Punishment and Execution of the Law: To uphold the law of nature, individuals in the state 7. Government as a Remedy: Locke acknowledges that civil government is the remedy for the
of nature have the right to punish those who violate it. This punishment should be inconveniences of the state of nature. While self-preservation and self-interest might lead individuals to
proportionate to the transgression and serve the purposes of reparation and restraint. It is not be partial or extreme in their judgments, government can restrain such behavior. However, Locke also
an arbitrary exercise of power but should be guided by calm reason and conscience. raises questions about absolute monarchies, where rulers have unchecked power.

7. Execution of the Law of Nature: In the state of nature, it is the duty of every individual to 8. The Reality of the State of Nature: Locke argues that since independent governments around the world
execute the law of nature. This is necessary to maintain peace, preserve the innocent, and operate in a state of nature, it is clear that there have always been and will always be individuals in the
state of nature.
restrain offenders. Each person has the right to punish wrongdoers, and this right is rooted in
the need for mutual security and the preservation of mankind. 9. State of Nature as the Default: Locke further asserts that everyone is naturally in the state of nature
and remains so until they voluntarily join a political society. He believes that the state of nature is the
In simpler terms, John Locke's text discusses the state of nature, a state of perfect freedom and default human condition.
equality where people are guided by the law of nature and have the right to protect
themselves and others. This includes the right to punish those who violate the law of nature to In simple terms, Locke is discussing the natural state of freedom and equality where individuals have the
maintain peace and security. This concept is foundational for understanding political power right to protect themselves, punish offenders, and seek reparation for harms. He also highlights the
and its origins. importance of government as a means to address the potential problems of individuals being judges in
their own cases, although he raises concerns about oppressive forms of government. According to Locke,
all people are naturally in the state of nature until they choose to form political societies.
II. III.
In this section of John Locke's "The Second Treatise of Government," Locke discusses the John Locke, in this part of his work, talks about the formation of political societies
concept of property and how individuals come to own things. Here's a breakdown of his and how individuals transition from a state of nature to living in a civil society.
ideas: Here's a simplified explanation:
1. Common Ownership: Locke starts by acknowledging that according to both natural
1. Natural Freedom: Locke begins by reminding us that all human beings are
reason and religious revelation, the Earth was given to mankind in common. In other
naturally born free, equal, and independent. This means that nobody has a right
words, everything on Earth was provided by God for the benefit of all humans.
to rule over another person without their consent.
2. Ownership through Labor: Locke argues that even though all the fruits of the Earth and
animals in their natural state are common property (belonging to everyone), people can 2. Transition to Civil Society: To leave this state of nature and come together to
acquire property rights through their labor. He uses the example of a wild Indian who form a civil society, people need to agree with one another to create a
hunts for food; once they catch an animal, it becomes their property because they have community. This agreement is based on the idea that they can live together more
mixed their labor with it. comfortably, safely, and peacefully as a group, ensuring the protection of their
property.
3. Labor Mixes with Nature: The act of an individual removing something from its natural
state and adding their labor to it makes that thing their property. This process 3. Majority Rule: Once a group of individuals has agreed to form a community or
distinguishes it from the common state and excludes others from claiming it. It's this labor government, they become a single political entity. The majority within this
mixing with nature that starts the concept of property.
community has the power to make decisions and pass laws. In other words, the
4. Ownership Timeline: Locke raises questions about when this appropriation happens. Is will of the majority determines the actions and rules of the entire society.
it when someone first gathers something, eats it, cooks it, brings it home, or picks it up?
He argues that it occurs at the point when an individual removes an item from the
4. Individual Consent: By becoming part of this community, every individual
common state, typically by collecting or gathering it. agrees to be bound by the decisions and rules made by the majority. If they didn't
agree with this arrangement, they wouldn't have joined the community in the first
5. Consent and Property: Locke counters the argument that property requires the explicit place.
consent of all commoners. He points out that without this natural process of individuals
appropriating resources through their labor, the concept of common property wouldn't 5. Practical Necessity: Locke argues that without such an arrangement, where the
function effectively. majority's decisions hold, a civil society would fall apart. Individual agreements for
6. Property Example: Locke provides an example of this principle in action. If someone every action or decision would be impractical and make any collective action
gathers acorns or apples in the wild to nourish themselves, they have effectively made impossible.
these resources their property through the act of gathering, which is a form of labor.
In simple terms, Locke suggests that when people form a community and enter
In simple terms, Locke argues that while the Earth and its resources are initially held in into a civil society, they agree to be bound by the decisions of the majority. This
common by all, individuals can acquire property rights through their labor. This is based on collective decision-making helps ensure a functioning and orderly society. Without
the idea that labor adds value to natural resources and that taking something out of its such a system, practical cooperation among individuals would be nearly
original common state, even without the consent of others, is the basis for establishing impossible.
ownership. So, property rights are not solely dependent on unanimous agreement but are
created through an individual's labor.

You might also like