Mactor Report - Trace Mba Ory

MACTOR - TRACE Page 1 / 46
Mactor Report
trace
The MACTOR method is created by Michel Godet and developed within LIPSOR - Godet, M. “Manuel de prospective stratégique, Tome 2”. Dunod
2001 - Godet, M. “Creating Futures Scenario Planning as a strategic Management Tool”. Economica
SOMMAIRE
I. Actor presentation.......................................................................................................3
1. List of actors...............................................................................................................3
2. Actor description..........................................................................................................3
II. Objective presentation.................................................................................................5
1. List of objectives..........................................................................................................5
III. Data input matrices..................................................................................................5
1. Matrix of Direct Influences (MDI)..................................................................................5
2. Valued position matrix (2MAO).....................................................................................6
IV. Results of the study..................................................................................................6
1. Direct and indirect influences........................................................................................6
1. Matrix of Direct and Indirect Influences (MDII)..............................................................6
2. Map of influences and dependences between actors.......................................................7
3. Net scale of influences (NS)..........................................................................................8
4. MDII competitiveness...................................................................................................9
5. Matrix of Maxima Direct and Indirect Influences (MMDII)..............................................14
6. MMDII competitiveness..............................................................................................15
2. Actors Objectives Relationship.....................................................................................19
1. Order 1 relationship...................................................................................................19
3. Convergence between actors......................................................................................23
1. Order 1 convergence..................................................................................................23
4. Divergence between actors.........................................................................................31
1. Order 1 divergence....................................................................................................31
2. Order 2 divergence....................................................................................................34
3. Order 3 Divergence....................................................................................................37
5. Actor ambivalence......................................................................................................40
1. Actor's ambivalence matrix.........................................................................................40
2. Histogram of actor's ambivalence................................................................................41
6. Net distance between objectives.................................................................................41
1. Map of net distances between objectives.....................................................................41
2. Graph of net distances between objectives...................................................................42
7. Net distances between actors.....................................................................................43
1. Map of net distances between actors...........................................................................43
2. Graph of net distances between actors........................................................................44
I. ACTOR PRESENTATION
1. LIST OF ACTORS
1. Semarang City Fisheries Agency (DKP SMG)
2. Marine and Fisheries Departments of Central Java Province (DKP Jateng)
3. Semarang city trade Agency (Disdag SMG)
4. Semarang city Helath Agency (Dinkes SMG)
5. National Agency of Drug and Food Control (BPOM)
6. Fish Quarantine Agency, Quality Control and Safety of Fishery Products (BKPIM)
7. Semarang City Cooperatives and SMEs Agency (DisKop)
8. Fishers (Producer)
9. processing (processing)
10. Traders (Traders)
11. legal institute (Legal)
12. Institute for Consumer Development and Protection (LP2K)
13. Academicians (Academic)
14. consumers (consumers)
2. ACTOR DESCRIPTION
a) Semarang City Fisheries Agency (DKP SMG)

Description :
instansi pemerintah kota semarang yang memiliki kewenangan pada perikanan budidaya;
produk perikanan segar maupun olahan yang ada di Kota Semarang. tugas dan wewenang dkp
kota semarang yaitu pembinaan, pendampingan dan monitoring komoditas ikan di Kota Semarang.
Dinas Keluatan dan Perikanan memiliki kewenangan mengeluarkan ijin SIUP
b) Marine and Fisheries Departments of Central Java Province (DKP Jateng)

Description :
instansi pemerintah yang memiliki kewenangan pada perikanan tangkap laut; budidaya;
konsumsi ikan di Provinsi Jawa Tengah. DKP memiliki tugas untuk pembinaan, pendampingan dan
monitoring berkaitan dengan perikanan dan kelautan
c) Semarang city trade Agency (Disdag SMG)

Description :
Instansi pemerintah Kota Semarang yang memiliki kewenangan pada perdagangan produk
perikanan. Tugas Dinas Perdagangan sebagai fasilitator pengawasan komoditas ikan (segar dan
olahan).
d) Semarang city Helath Agency (Dinkes SMG)

Description :
Instansi Pemerintah yang memiliki kewenangan untuk membina dan mendampingi pelaku
usaha produk perikanan (olahan) dan memonitoring penjualan produk perikanan (olahan). Dinas
Kesehatan juga memiliki kewenangan untuk mengeluarkan ijin edar PIRT sebagai penjamin
keamanan pangan
e) National Agency of Drug and Food Control (BPOM)

Description :
instansi pemerintah nonkementerian yang berwenang untuk mengawasi kandungan zat zat
tambahan pada produk ikan (olahan). BPOM memiliki fungsi pembinaan; monitoring dan evaluasi
pelaku usaha perikanan. BPOM juga memiliki laboratirum untuk menguji kandungan pangan dari
penggunaan obat yang berbahaya. BPOM juga memiliki kewenangan untuk mengeluarkan ijin edar
MD dan ML sebagai penjamin keamanan pangan serta memiliki tugas untuk menarik ijin usaha
(bekerja sama dengan lemabaga hukum) bagi pelaku usaha yang melanggar
f) Fish Quarantine Agency, Quality Control and Safety of Fishery Products

(BKPIM)
Description :
BKIPM berada dibawah Kementerian Kelautan Perikanan. BKIPM berwenang dalam
pembinaan dan monitoring perikanan dan kelautan. BKIPM bertugas untuk menguji kesehatan ikan
untuk konsumsi khusus untuk ikan eskpor (luar negeri maupun antar daerah).
g) Semarang City Cooperatives and SMEs Agency (DisKop)

Description :
instansi pemerintahan Kota Semarang yang memiliki wewenang pembinaan dan fasilitator
bagi pelaku usaha untuk memiliki jaminan keamanan pangan melalui sertifikasi
Goals and Objectives :
1. fasilitator untuk meningkatkan pelaku usaha (pengolah ikan)
2. meningkatkan daya saing pelaku usaha (pengolah ikan)
3. peningkatkan kualitas usaha akan meningkatkan penjaminan keamanan pangan
h) Fishers (Producer)
Description :
pelaku usaha yang menangkap ikan dilaut atau dapat disebut sebagai produsen primer
komoditas ikan
Interview :
Interview date10/10/2021 14:52:29
InterviewerInterviewee :
Contact :
Position :
Business :
i) processing (processing)
Description :
pelaku usaha yang mengolah ikan untuk dijual kembali
j) Traders (Traders)
Description :
Pelaku usaha yang mendistribusikan ikan sehingga sampai ke tangan pengolah ikan dan
atau konsumen rumah tangga. Pedagang yang dimaksud yaitu pedagang di pasar dan bakul ikan
keliling
k) legal institute (Legal)

Description :
Lembaga hukum yang memiliki kewenangan menjatuhi hukuman bagi pelaku usaha yang
melakukan tindak kecurangan secara disengaja karena menggunaan bahan bahan yang tidak baik
untuk kesehatan konsumen.
l) Institute for Consumer Development and Protection (LP2K)

Description :
Organisasi Masyarakat (Lembaga Non Pemerintah) yang memiliki peran sebagai pembinaan
dan perlindungan konsumen. LP2K memberikan edukasi kepada masyarakat dan menerima
tampungan keluhan masyarakat terhadap makanan yang dicuragai mengandung bahan berbahaya
sehingga LP2K merupakan fasilitator penjembatan konsumen dengan instansi pemerintah terkait
yang memiliki kewenangan dalam monitoring dan evaluasi keamanan pangan.
Weaknesses :
1. meskipun sbg lembaga perlindungan konsumen tapi memiliki pengaruh yang rendah terhdp
pencapaian keamanan pangan
m) Academicians (Academic)
Description :
Akademisi memiliki andil dengan melakukan penelitian mengenai makanan yang aman dan
berkualitas, bekerjasama dengan instansi terkait dalam pembinaan dan pendampingan.
Interview :
Interview date10/10/2021 14:52:49
InterviewerInterviewee :
Contact :
Position :
Business :
n) consumers (consumers)
Description :
konsumen merupakan masyarakat yang mengkonsumsi ikan di Kota Semarang
II. OBJECTIVE PRESENTATION

1. LIST OF OBJECTIVES
1. competitiveness business (competitve)
2. value added fish produc (add value)
3. income business (income)
4. public nutrition (nutrition)
III. DATA INPUT MATRICES

1. MATRIX OF DIRECT INFLUENCES (MDI)
The Matrix of Direct Influences (MDI) Actor X Actor created from the actors' strategies table,
describes the direct influences actors have on each other.
DKP SMG
DKP Jateng
Disdag SMG
Dinkes SMG
BPOM
BKPIM
DisKop
Producer
processing
Traders
Legal
LP2K
Academic
consumers
MDI
DKP SMG 0 4 3 2 3 4 3 3 3 1 0 2 3 1
DKP Jateng 4 0 1 2 3 4 1 4 1 1 0 1 3 1
Disdag SMG 2 1 0 2 2 1 1 1 0 2 0 3 1 0
Dinkes SMG 2 2 2 0 4 3 4 0 4 0 2 4 2 2
BPOM 2 3 2 4 0 3 3 0 3 1 4 4 3 2
BKPIM 4 4 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 2 4 2 2 1
© LIPSOR-EPITA-MACTOR
DisKop 1 2 2 3 2 1 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 0
Producer 3 3 0 0 0 2 1 0 2 4 0 1 3 2
processing 4 2 0 4 3 3 3 3 0 0 2 2 3 3
Traders 3 1 3 2 1 2 2 4 3 0 1 1 2 3
Legal 1 0 2 2 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0
LP2K 1 1 0 4 3 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 2 2
Academic 4 3 1 2 3 1 3 2 2 1 0 3 0 1
consumers 0 0 0 2 2 0 2 3 3 3 1 3 1 0
Influences are graded from 0 to 4 according to the importance of the actor's possible jeopardy:
0: No influence
1: Operating procedures
2: Projects
3: Missions
4: Existance
2. VALUED POSITION MATRIX (2MAO)

The matrix of valued positions Actor X Objective (2MAO) provides information on the actor's
stance on each objective (pro, against, neutral or indifferent) and the hierarchy of its objectives.
competitve
add value
income
nutrition
2MAO
DKP SMG 4 4 4 4
DKP Jateng 4 4 4 4
Disdag SMG 2 2 2 1
Dinkes SMG 3 4 3 4
BPOM 4 4 4 3
BKPIM 4 4 4 4
DisKop 4 3 4 0
Producer -2 1 -2 -1
processing 3 3 3 -1
Traders 1 2 2 -3
Legal -2 -2 -1 1
LP2K 1 2 2 3
Academic 3 3 3 4
consumers -2 -2 -1 4
The sign indicates whether the actor is likely to reach objective or not.
0: Objecive has a bleak outcome
1: Objective jeopardises the actor's operating procedures (management, etc...) / is vital for its
operating procedures
2: Objective jeopardises the success of the actor's projects / is vital for the success of its
projects
3: Objective jeopardises the accomplishment of the actor's mission / is indispensible for its
missions
4: Objective jeopardises the actor's existence / is indispensible for its existence
IV. RESULTS OF THE STUDY

1. DIRECT AND INDIRECT INFLUENCES
1. Matrix of Direct and Indirect Influences (MDII)

The MDII matrix determines the direct or indirect influences of order 2 between actors. The
utility of this matrix is its more complete vision of the games of competitiveness (an actor can reduce
the number of choices of another by influencing it through an intermediary actor). The "sum"
operation used to calculate the MDII does not produce (in this new matrix) the same scale of
intensities adopted to evaluate direct influences in MDI. Despite this, values in MDII are a good
indicator of the importance of direct and indirect influences actors have on each other. Two indicators
are calculated from the MDII:
- The degree of direct and indirect influence of each actor (Ii, by summing rows).
- The degree of direct and indirect dependence of each actor (Di, by summing columns).
DKP SMG
DKP Jateng
Disdag SMG
Dinkes SMG
BPOM
BKPIM
DisKop
Producer
processing
Traders
Legal
LP2K
Academic
consumers
Ii
MDII
DKP SMG 26 26 13 21 23 22 20 16 18 14 15 23 24 16 251

DKP Jateng 23 24 12 15 18 20 18 14 17 13 13 19 21 13 216
Disdag SMG 14 13 12 14 14 13 13 8 13 10 8 15 14 13 162
Dinkes SMG 20 18 13 27 25 18 19 13 17 12 14 25 18 13 225
BPOM 22 20 14 27 30 21 21 15 18 12 15 28 20 14 247
BKPIM 19 17 12 17 20 19 14 15 13 11 10 17 17 11 193
DisKop 13 12 9 14 15 12 11 7 10 8 9 14 13 11 147
Producer 18 16 10 14 17 14 15 17 15 12 7 15 17 12 182
processing 22 23 14 22 24 21 21 14 21 14 13 25 21 15 249
Traders 22 20 15 19 21 18 19 18 20 16 10 23 20 16 241
Legal 11 11 8 12 13 10 8 3 7 8 11 14 11 8 124
LP2K 11 10 11 17 16 13 15 8 15 8 9 16 12 11 156
Academic 20 22 13 20 22 20 19 14 18 11 12 20 21 15 226
consumers 17 14 11 16 15 14 13 10 15 10 10 15 15 15 175
Di 232 222 155 228 243 216 215 155 196 143 145 253 223 168 2794
Values represent direct and indirect influences between actors:

The higher the value, the more influence the actor has on the other.
2. Map of influences and dependences between actors

Map of influence and dependence between actors is a graphic representation of actors'
positions with respect to influences and dependences (direct or indirect: Di and Ii) between each
other. Positions are calculated automatically by the Mactor software.
3. Net scale of influences (NS)

The net scale of direct and indirect influences measures, for every couple of actors, the distance
between the direct and indirect influence. Each actor exerts (receives) direct and indirect influences of
order 2 (from) each actor. The net influence scale will indicate for each couple of actors the surplus
influence either exerted or received. If the scale is positive (+ sign), actor i (rows of NS matrix) has
more direct and indirect influence on actor j (columns of NS matrix) than it receives from this actor.
This is the opposite when the scale has a negative ( - ) sign. The next step is to calculate for each
actor the total difference of direct and indirect influences by adding up the net influence scales on the
rest of the actors.
DKP SMG
DKP Jateng
Disdag SMG
Dinkes SMG
BPOM
BKPIM
DisKop
Producer
processing
Traders
Legal
LP2K
Academic
consumers
Sum
NS
DKP SMG 3 -1 1 1 3 7 -2 -4 -8 4 12 4 -1 19
DKP Jateng -3 -1 -3 -2 3 6 -2 -6 -7 2 9 -1 -1 -6
Disdag SMG 1 1 1 0 1 4 -2 -1 -5 0 4 1 2 7
Dinkes SMG -1 3 -1 -2 1 5 -1 -5 -7 2 8 -2 -3 -3
BPOM -1 2 0 2 1 6 -2 -6 -9 2 12 -2 -1 4
BKPIM -3 -3 -1 -1 -1 2 1 -8 -7 0 4 -3 -3 -23
DisKop -7 -6 -4 -5 -6 -2 -8 -11 -11 1 -1 -6 -2 -68
Producer 2 2 2 1 2 -1 8 1 -6 4 7 3 2 27
processing 4 6 1 5 6 8 11 -1 -6 6 10 3 0 53
Traders 8 7 5 7 9 7 11 6 6 2 15 9 6 98
Legal -4 -2 0 -2 -2 0 -1 -4 -6 -2 5 -1 -2 -21
LP2K -12 -9 -4 -8 -12 -4 1 -7 -10 -15 -5 -8 -4 -97
Academic -4 1 -1 2 2 3 6 -3 -3 -9 1 8 0 3
consumers 1 1 -2 3 1 3 2 -2 0 -6 2 4 0 7
Values are relative whole numbers:

The (+) sign indicates the actor exerts more influence than it receives.
The (-) sign indicates the actor exerts less influence than it receives.
4. MDII competitiveness
a) MDII competitiveness vector

The Matrix of Direct an Indirect Influences (MDII) provides two types of useful information:
- The direct and indirect influences actor i has on actor j (MDII)ij where i!=j and are equivalent,
by definition, to the direct and indirect dependence actor j has with respect to actor i.
- The indirect influences actor i has on itself coming through an intermediary actor. This is
called retroaction (MDII)ii. When an actor is more competitive so will be its influence, but its
dependence and retroaction will be quite weak. It is foolish to think that only the actor's influence
measures its competitiveness. An actor can be very influential, be also very dependent and at the
same time be very retroactive: this would result in a weak competitiveness. However, an actor being
moderately influential, and having no dependence or retroaction will be very competitive.
Ri
DKP SMG 1,28

DKP Jateng 1,03
Disdag SMG 0,84
Dinkes SMG 1,07
BPOM 1,19
BKPIM 0,90
DisKop 0,60
Producer 0,97
processing 1,39
Traders 1,54
Legal 0,57
LP2K 0,58
Academic 1,13
consumers 0,89
Ri* is the competitiveness of actor i considering its max: influences; direct and indirect
dependence; and feedback.
b) Histogram of MDII's competitiveness

The MDII competitiveness histogram is created from the MDII competitiveness vector.
c) MDII competitiveness scale - Objective : competitiveness

business
d)
e) MDII competitiveness scale - Objective : value added fish

produc
f)
g) MDII competitiveness scale - Objective : income business
h)
i) MDII competitiveness scale - Objective : public nutrition
j)
5. Matrix of Maxima Direct and Indirect Influences

(MMDII)
The MMDII is employed to determine the maximum level of influence an actor can have on
another, either directly or indirectly (through an intermediary actor). However, in the MDII matrix we
loose the sense the simple meaning used to construct the scale of intensities (of direct influences in
the MDI matrix), the MMDII conserves this scale. There are two interesting results given by the
MMDII:
- The degree of direct and indirect influence maxima of every actor (IMAXi) is calculated by
adding the rows.
- The degree of direct and indirect dependence maxima of every actor (DMAXi) is calculated by
adding the columns.
DKP SMG
DKP Jateng
Disdag SMG
Dinkes SMG
BPOM
BKPIM
DisKop
Producer
processing
Traders
Legal
LP2K
Academic
consumers
IMAXi
MMDII
DKP SMG 0 4 3 3 3 4 3 4 3 3 4 3 3 3 43
DKP Jateng 4 0 3 3 3 4 3 4 3 4 4 3 3 2 43
Disdag SMG 2 2 0 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 2 2 29
Dinkes SMG 4 3 2 0 4 3 4 3 4 2 4 4 3 3 43
BPOM 3 3 2 4 0 3 4 3 4 2 4 4 3 3 42
BKPIM 4 4 3 2 4 0 3 4 3 2 4 3 3 2 41
DisKop 2 2 2 3 3 3 0 2 3 2 2 3 2 2 31
Producer 3 3 3 2 3 3 3 0 3 4 2 3 3 3 38
processing 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 3 0 3 3 4 3 3 46
Traders 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 3 0 2 3 3 3 39
Legal 3 3 2 4 4 3 3 1 3 2 0 4 3 2 37
LP2K 2 3 2 4 4 3 4 2 4 2 3 0 3 2 38
Academic 4 4 3 3 3 4 3 3 3 2 3 3 0 2 40
consumers 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 3 0 38
DMAXi 41 41 34 41 44 42 42 38 41 33 39 43 37 32 548
Values represent maximum direct and indirect influences between actors:

The higher the value, the more influence the actor has on the other.
6. MMDII competitiveness
a) Histogram of MMDII's competitiveness

The MMDII competitiveness histogram is created from the MMDII competitiveness vector.
b) Position scale by valued objectives weighted competitiveness -

Objective : competitiveness business
c)
d) Position scale by valued objectives weighted competitiveness -

Objective : value added fish produc
e)
f) Position scale by valued objectives weighted competitiveness -

Objective : income business
g)
h) Position scale by valued objectives weighted competitiveness -

Objective : public nutrition
i)
2. ACTORS OBJECTIVES RELATIONSHIP
1. Order 1 relationship
a) Simple position matrix (1MAO)

The simple position 1MAO matrix shows the valency of each actor with respect to every
objective (likely, unlikely, neutral, or indifferent). This matrix, result of Mactor's phase 3, is not made
up of the initial data entries. Mactor recalculates it from 2MAO.
competitve
add value
income
nutrition
Absolute sum
1MAO
DKP SMG 1 1 1 1 4
DKP Jateng 1 1 1 1 4
Disdag SMG 1 1 1 1 4
Dinkes SMG 1 1 1 1 4
BPOM 1 1 1 1 4
BKPIM 1 1 1 1 4
DisKop 1 1 1 0 3
Producer -1 1 -1 -1 4
processing 1 1 1 -1 4
Traders 1 1 1 -1 4
Legal -1 -1 -1 1 4
LP2K 1 1 1 1 4
Academic 1 1 1 1 4
consumers -1 -1 -1 1 4
Number of agreements 11 12 11 10
Number of disagreements -3 -2 -3 -3
Number of positions 14 14 14 13
-1: actor unlikely to achieve objective

0: Neutral position
1: actor likely to achieve objective
a) Valued position matrix (2MAO)

The 2MAO matrix specifies the actor's position on each objective (pro, against, neutral or
indifferent). This matrix is the initial information given by the user and also presents marginalities.
competitve
add value
income
nutrition
2MAO
DKP SMG 4 4 4 4
DKP Jateng 4 4 4 4
Disdag SMG 2 2 2 1
Dinkes SMG 3 4 3 4
BPOM 4 4 4 3
BKPIM 4 4 4 4
DisKop 4 3 4 0
Producer -2 1 -2 -1
processing 3 3 3 -1
Traders 1 2 2 -3
Legal -2 -2 -1 1
LP2K 1 2 2 3
Academic 3 3 3 4
consumers -2 -2 -1 4
The sign indicates whether the actor is likely to reach objective or not.
0: Objecive has a bleak outcome
1: Objective jeopardises the actor's operating procedures (management, etc...) / is vital for its
operating procedures
2: Objective jeopardises the success of the actor's projects / is vital for the success of its
projects
3: Objective jeopardises the accomplishment of the actor's mission / is indispensible for its
missions
4: Objective jeopardises the actor's existence / is indispensible for its existence
b) Histogram of actor's implication towards its objectives 2MAO

This histogram is produced from the valued relationship matrix (order 2) between actors and
objectives, 2MAO. It represents the actor's objectives mobilisation. The histogram is used to identify
for each actor, the extent of its position with respect to the defined objectives, e.g. pro or against.
a) Weighted valued position matrix (3MAO)

The weighted (with respect to competitiveness) valued position matrix (3MAO) describes each
actor's position on every objective. This is taking into account its degree of opinion on every objective,
its objective hierarchy and competitiveness between actors.
competitve
add value
income
nutrition
Mobilisation
3MAO
DKP SMG 5,1 5,1 5,1 5,1 20,4

DKP Jateng 4,1 4,1 4,1 4,1 16,6
Disdag SMG 1,7 1,7 1,7 0,8 5,9
Dinkes SMG 3,2 4,3 3,2 4,3 15,0
BPOM 4,8 4,8 4,8 3,6 17,9
BKPIM 3,6 3,6 3,6 3,6 14,4
DisKop 2,4 1,8 2,4 0,0 6,6
Producer -1,9 1,0 -1,9 -1,0 5,8
processing 4,2 4,2 4,2 -1,4 13,9
Traders 1,5 3,1 3,1 -4,6 12,3

Legal -1,1 -1,1 -0,6 0,6 3,4
LP2K 0,6 1,2 1,2 1,8 4,7
Academic 3,4 3,4 3,4 4,5 14,7
consumers -1,8 -1,8 -0,9 3,6 8,0
Number of agreements 34,6 38,2 36,7 31,9
Number of disagreements -4,9 -2,9 -3,4 -7,0
Degree of mobilisation 39,5 41,1 40,1 38,9
Positive values represent the actor's mobilisation towards its objectives.

Negative values represent the rate of opposition.
b) Histogram of actor's mobilisation towards its objectives 3MAO

This histogram is produced from the valued relationship matrix (order 3) between actors and
objectives, 3MAO. It represents the actions taken by actors towards objectives. The histogram is used
to identify for each actor, the extent of its position with respect to the defined objectives, e.g. pro or
against.
c) Weighted valued position matrix (3MAO)

competitve
add value
income
nutrition
Mobilisation
3MAO
DKP SMG 5,1 5,1 5,1 5,1 20,4

DKP Jateng 4,1 4,1 4,1 4,1 16,6
Disdag SMG 1,7 1,7 1,7 0,8 5,9
Dinkes SMG 3,2 4,3 3,2 4,3 15,0
BPOM 4,8 4,8 4,8 3,6 17,9
BKPIM 3,6 3,6 3,6 3,6 14,4
DisKop 2,4 1,8 2,4 0,0 6,6
Producer -1,9 1,0 -1,9 -1,0 5,8
processing 4,2 4,2 4,2 -1,4 13,9
Traders 1,5 3,1 3,1 -4,6 12,3

Legal -1,1 -1,1 -0,6 0,6 3,4
LP2K 0,6 1,2 1,2 1,8 4,7
Academic 3,4 3,4 3,4 4,5 14,7
consumers -1,8 -1,8 -0,9 3,6 8,0
Number of agreements 34,6 38,2 36,7 31,9
Number of disagreements -4,9 -2,9 -3,4 -7,0
Degree of mobilisation 39,5 41,1 40,1 38,9
Positive values represent the actor's mobilisation towards its objectives.

Negative values represent the rate of opposition.
3. CONVERGENCE BETWEEN ACTORS
1. Order 1 convergence
a) Convergence matrix (1CAA)

The Matrix of objectives convergences between actors or simple Convergences Actor X Actor
(1CAA) identifies for a couple of actors the number of common positions they have on objectives (pro
or against). This would identify the number of possible alliances. "Neutral" and "indifferent" positions
(coded as "0") are not taken into consideration. This is a symmetrical matrix.
DKP SMG
DKP Jateng
Disdag SMG
Dinkes SMG
BPOM
BKPIM
DisKop
Producer
processing
Traders
Legal
LP2K
Academic
consumers
1CAA
DKP SMG 0 4 4 4 4 4 3 1 3 3 1 4 4 1
DKP Jateng 4 0 4 4 4 4 3 1 3 3 1 4 4 1
Disdag SMG 4 4 0 4 4 4 3 1 3 3 1 4 4 1
Dinkes SMG 4 4 4 0 4 4 3 1 3 3 1 4 4 1
BPOM 4 4 4 4 0 4 3 1 3 3 1 4 4 1
BKPIM 4 4 4 4 4 0 3 1 3 3 1 4 4 1
DisKop 3 3 3 3 3 3 0 1 3 3 0 3 3 0
Producer 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 2 2 2 1 1 2
processing 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 0 4 0 3 3 0
Traders 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 4 0 0 3 3 0
Legal 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 1 1 4
LP2K 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 1 3 3 1 0 4 1
Academic 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 1 3 3 1 4 0 1
consumers 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 2 0 0 4 1 1 0
Number of convergences 40 40 40 40 40 40 31 17 33 33 14 40 40 14
The values represent the degree of convergence: the higher the intesity, the more actors have
common interests
b) Map of order 1 convergences between actors

The map of convergences between actors maps the actors with respect to their convergences
(data in matrices 1CAA, 2CAA, 3CAA). That is, the closer actors are to each other, the more their
convergence is intense. This map is used to create a graph of actors' convergences.
c) Graph of order 1 convergences between actors

The graph of convergences between actors maps the actors with respect to their convergences
convergence is intense.
a) Valued convergence matrix (2CAA)

The valued convergence matrix or Valued Convergence Actors X Actors (2CAA) is related to the
Matrix of valued positions Actors X Objectives (2MAO). This calculates the average convergence
intensity between two actors, when these have the same degree (pro or against the objective). The
values in this matrix do not measure the number of potential alliances (as in 1CAA), but the alliance
intensity with the objectives hierarchy (preferences) of the couple of actors. This is a symmetrical
matrix.
DKP SMG
DKP Jateng
Disdag SMG
Dinkes SMG
BPOM
BKPIM
DisKop
Producer
processing
Traders
Legal
LP2K
Academic
consumers
2CAA
DKP SMG 0,0 16,0 11,5 15,0 15,5 16,0 11,5 2,5 10,5 8,5 2,5 12,0 14,5 4,0
DKP Jateng 16,0 0,0 11,5 15,0 15,5 16,0 11,5 2,5 10,5 8,5 2,5 12,0 14,5 4,0
Disdag SMG 11,5 11,5 0,0 10,5 11,0 11,5 8,5 1,5 7,5 5,5 1,0 7,5 10,0 2,5
Dinkes SMG 15,0 15,0 10,5 0,0 14,5 15,0 10,5 2,5 9,5 7,5 2,5 11,0 13,5 4,0
BPOM 15,5 15,5 11,0 14,5 0,0 15,5 11,5 2,5 10,5 8,5 2,0 11,5 14,0 3,5
BKPIM 16,0 16,0 11,5 15,0 15,5 0,0 11,5 2,5 10,5 8,5 2,5 12,0 14,5 4,0
DisKop 11,5 11,5 8,5 10,5 11,5 11,5 0,0 2,0 10,0 8,0 0,0 8,0 10,0 0,0
Producer 2,5 2,5 1,5 2,5 2,5 2,5 2,0 0,0 3,0 3,5 3,5 1,5 2,0 3,5
processing 10,5 10,5 7,5 9,5 10,5 10,5 10,0 3,0 0,0 9,0 0,0 7,0 9,0 0,0
Traders 8,5 8,5 5,5 7,5 8,5 8,5 8,0 3,5 9,0 0,0 0,0 5,0 7,0 0,0
Legal 2,5 2,5 1,0 2,5 2,0 2,5 0,0 3,5 0,0 0,0 0,0 2,0 2,5 7,5
LP2K 12,0 12,0 7,5 11,0 11,5 12,0 8,0 1,5 7,0 5,0 2,0 0,0 10,5 3,5
Academic 14,5 14,5 10,0 13,5 14,0 14,5 10,0 2,0 9,0 7,0 2,5 10,5 0,0 4,0
consumers 4,0 4,0 2,5 4,0 3,5 4,0 0,0 3,5 0,0 0,0 7,5 3,5 4,0 0,0
Number of convergences 140,0 140,0 100,0 131,0 136,0 140,0 103,0 33,0 97,0 79,5 28,5 103,5 126,0 40,5
Degree of convergence (%) 70,7
common interests


a) Weighted valued convergence matrix (3CAA)

The weighted valued matrix of convergences or weighted valued Convergences Actors X Actors
(3CAA) is related to the weighted valued position matrix Actors X Objectives (3MAO). It identifies for a
couple of actors the number of common positions they have on objectives (pro or against). This would
identify the number of possible alliances also taking into account the actors' preferences in terms of
objectives and their competitiveness. This is a symmetrical matrix.
DKP SMG
DKP Jateng
Disdag SMG
Dinkes SMG
BPOM
BKPIM
DisKop
Producer
processing
Traders
Legal
LP2K
Academic
consumers
3CAA
DKP SMG 0,0 18,5 13,1 17,7 19,2 17,4 11,0 3,0 13,9 11,5 2,8 12,6 17,5 4,3
DKP Jateng 18,5 0,0 11,2 15,8 17,2 15,5 9,5 2,6 12,5 10,1 2,4 10,6 15,6 3,9
Disdag SMG 13,1 11,2 0,0 10,5 11,9 10,1 5,8 1,3 8,8 6,4 0,7 5,3 10,3 2,2
Dinkes SMG 17,7 15,8 10,5 0,0 16,5 14,7 8,7 2,6 11,6 9,2 2,4 9,9 14,8 3,9
BPOM 19,2 17,2 11,9 16,5 0,0 16,1 10,5 2,9 13,4 11,0 2,1 11,3 16,3 3,6
BKPIM 17,4 15,5 10,1 14,7 16,1 0,0 8,7 2,3 11,7 9,2 2,1 9,5 14,5 3,6
DisKop 11,0 9,5 5,8 8,7 10,5 8,7 0,0 1,4 9,6 7,2 0,0 4,8 8,4 0,0
Producer 3,0 2,6 1,3 2,6 2,9 2,3 1,4 0,0 3,8 4,8 2,8 1,1 2,2 3,3
processing 13,9 12,5 8,8 11,6 13,4 11,7 9,6 3,8 0,0 13,1 0,0 7,7 11,3 0,0
Traders 11,5 10,1 6,4 9,2 11,0 9,2 7,2 4,8 13,1 0,0 0,0 5,3 8,9 0,0
Legal 2,8 2,4 0,7 2,4 2,1 2,1 0,0 2,8 0,0 0,0 0,0 1,2 2,5 5,7
LP2K 12,6 10,6 5,3 9,9 11,3 9,5 4,8 1,1 7,7 5,3 1,2 0,0 9,7 2,7
Academic 17,5 15,6 10,3 14,8 16,3 14,5 8,4 2,2 11,3 8,9 2,5 9,7 0,0 4,0
consumers 4,3 3,9 2,2 3,9 3,6 3,6 0,0 3,3 0,0 0,0 5,7 2,7 4,0 0,0
Number of convergences 162,7 145,2 97,5 138,4 152,0 135,3 85,5 34,0 117,5 96,8 24,7 91,5 136,1 37,2
Degree of convergence (%) 0,0
common interests


4. DIVERGENCE BETWEEN ACTORS
1. Order 1 divergence
a) Divergence matrix (1DAA)

The Matrix of divergences of objectives between actor or simple Divergences Actors X Actors
(1DAA) identifies for each couple of actors the number of objectives on which these actors do not hold
the same position (one actor is pre the objective and the other is against it). In other words it
describes the number of potential conflicts. "Neutral" and "indifferent" positions (with code "0") are
not taken into consideration. This is a symmetrical matrix.
DKP SMG
DKP Jateng
Disdag SMG
Dinkes SMG
BPOM
BKPIM
DisKop
Producer
processing
Traders
Legal
LP2K
Academic
consumers
1DAA
DKP SMG 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 1 3 0 0 3
DKP Jateng 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 1 3 0 0 3
Disdag SMG 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 1 3 0 0 3
Dinkes SMG 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 1 3 0 0 3
BPOM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 1 3 0 0 3
BKPIM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 1 3 0 0 3
DisKop 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 3 0 0 3
Producer 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 0 2 2 2 3 3 2
processing 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 2 0 0 4 1 1 4
Traders 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 2 0 0 4 1 1 4
Legal 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 4 4 0 3 3 0
LP2K 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 1 3 0 0 3
Academic 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 1 3 0 0 3
consumers 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 4 4 0 3 3 0
Number of divergences 11 11 11 11 11 11 8 34 18 18 37 11 11 37
The values represent the degree of divergence: the higher the intesity, the more actors have
diverging interests
b) Map of order 1 divergences between actors

This maps the actors' positions according to their valued divergences (data found in Matrix
2DAA). That is, the further apart actors are to each other, the more their divergence is intense.
c) Graph of order 1 divergences between actors

The graph of divergences between actors, maps the actors of order 2 with respect to their
divergences (data in matrices 1DAA). It helps to identify potential alliances and conflicts.
2. Order 2 divergence
a) Valued divergence matrix (2DAA)

The Matrix of valued divergences or valued Divergences Actors X Actors (2DAA) is related to the
Matrix of valued positions Actors X Objectives (2MAO). It identifies for each couple of actors the
number of objectives for which these actors do not hold the same position (one actor is pro the
objective and the other is against it). The values in this matrix do not measure the number of
potential conflicts (as in 1DAA), but rather the conflict intensity with the objectives hierarchy
(preferences) of the couple of actors. This is a symmetrical matrix.
DKP SMG
DKP Jateng
Disdag SMG
Dinkes SMG
BPOM
BKPIM
DisKop
Producer
processing
Traders
Legal
LP2K
Academic
consumers
2DAA
DKP SMG 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 8,5 2,5 3,5 8,5 0,0 0,0 8,5
DKP Jateng 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 8,5 2,5 3,5 8,5 0,0 0,0 8,5
Disdag SMG 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 5,0 1,0 2,0 5,5 0,0 0,0 5,5
Dinkes SMG 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 7,5 2,5 3,5 7,5 0,0 0,0 7,5
BPOM 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 8,0 2,0 3,0 8,5 0,0 0,0 8,5
BKPIM 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 8,5 2,5 3,5 8,5 0,0 0,0 8,5
DisKop 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 6,0 0,0 0,0 8,0 0,0 0,0 8,0
Producer 8,5 8,5 5,0 7,5 8,0 8,5 6,0 0,0 5,0 3,5 2,5 5,5 7,5 4,0
processing 2,5 2,5 1,0 2,5 2,0 2,5 0,0 5,0 0,0 0,0 8,0 2,0 2,5 9,5
Traders 3,5 3,5 2,0 3,5 3,0 3,5 0,0 3,5 0,0 0,0 7,0 3,0 3,5 8,5
Legal 8,5 8,5 5,5 7,5 8,5 8,5 8,0 2,5 8,0 7,0 0,0 5,0 7,0 0,0
LP2K 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 5,5 2,0 3,0 5,0 0,0 0,0 5,0
Academic 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 7,5 2,5 3,5 7,0 0,0 0,0 7,0
consumers 8,5 8,5 5,5 7,5 8,5 8,5 8,0 4,0 9,5 8,5 0,0 5,0 7,0 0,0
Number of divergences 31,5 31,5 19,0 28,5 30,0 31,5 22,0 80,0 40,0 44,5 84,5 20,5 27,5 89,0
Degree of divergence (%) 29,3
diverging interests


3. Order 3 Divergence
a) Weighted valued divergence matrix (3DAA)

The weighted valued matrix of divergences or weighted valued Divergences Actors X Actors
(3DAA) is related to the weighted valued position matrix Actors X Objectives (3MAO). It identifies for
each couple the average divergence intensity for those two actors who do not hold the same position
(one actor is pro the objective and the other is against it). The values of this Matrix measure the
conflict intensity with, for every couple, their objectives hierarchies (preferences) and their
competitiveness. This is a symmetrical matrix.
DKP SMG
DKP Jateng
Disdag SMG
Dinkes SMG
BPOM
BKPIM
DisKop
Producer
processing
Traders
Legal
LP2K
Academic
consumers
3DAA
DKP SMG 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 10,1 3,3 4,9 9,1 0,0 0,0 9,9
DKP Jateng 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 8,6 2,8 4,4 7,6 0,0 0,0 8,4
Disdag SMG 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 4,5 1,1 2,7 3,9 0,0 0,0 4,7
Dinkes SMG 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 7,8 2,8 4,5 6,8 0,0 0,0 7,6
BPOM 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 9,0 2,5 4,1 8,6 0,0 0,0 9,4
BKPIM 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 7,8 2,5 4,1 6,8 0,0 0,0 7,6
DisKop 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 4,4 0,0 0,0 4,7 0,0 0,0 5,5
Producer 10,1 8,6 4,5 7,8 9,0 7,8 4,4 0,0 6,1 4,3 1,8 4,2 8,1 3,6
processing 3,3 2,8 1,1 2,8 2,5 2,5 0,0 6,1 0,0 0,0 8,7 1,6 3,0 11,0
Traders 4,9 4,4 2,7 4,5 4,1 4,1 0,0 4,3 0,0 0,0 7,9 3,2 4,6 10,2
Legal 9,1 7,6 3,9 6,8 8,6 6,8 4,7 1,8 8,7 7,9 0,0 2,9 6,5 0,0
LP2K 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 4,2 1,6 3,2 2,9 0,0 0,0 3,7
Academic 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 8,1 3,0 4,6 6,5 0,0 0,0 7,3
consumers 9,9 8,4 4,7 7,6 9,4 7,6 5,5 3,6 11,0 10,2 0,0 3,7 7,3 0,0
Number of divergences 37,2 31,9 17,1 29,5 33,6 28,8 14,6 80,4 45,3 54,7 75,3 15,5 29,4 89,0
Degree of divergence (%) 0,0
diverging interests


5. ACTOR AMBIVALENCE
1. Actor's ambivalence matrix

Two actors can share both converging and diverging positions on different objectives. Hence,
we call this couple of actors ambivalent. If they wish to become allies, they have to work only on
those common objectives, and put aside their diverging objectives. Actor ambivalence is calculated
with three equilibrium indicators using their simple, valued, then valued and weighted positions.
EQ[1]
EQ[2]
EQ[3]
DKP SMG 0,2 0,2 0,2

DKP Jateng 0,2 0,2 0,2
Disdag SMG 0,2 0,1 0,1
Dinkes SMG 0,2 0,2 0,2
BPOM 0,2 0,2 0,2
BKPIM 0,2 0,2 0,2
DisKop 0,1 0,0 0,0

Producer 0,7 0,6 0,6
processing 0,4 0,3 0,3
Traders 0,4 0,5 0,5
Legal 0,4 0,4 0,4
LP2K 0,2 0,2 0,2
Academic 0,2 0,2 0,2
consumers 0,4 0,5 0,5
This indicator varies from 1 (very ambivalent actors) to 0 (not ambivalent actors).
2. Histogram of actor's ambivalence

This histogram is produced from the actor ambivalence vector.
6. NET DISTANCE BETWEEN OBJECTIVES
1. Map of net distances between objectives

This map is used to identify objectives on which actors take the same position (either pro or
against). It hence enables to isolate groups of objectives where there is a strong convergence (when
objectives are close together) or divergence (when objectives are far apart) on the part of actors'
opinion. It also maps objectives with respect to the net scale (the difference between the valued
convergence matrix and the valued divergence matrix, respectively 2COO and 2DOO).
2. Graph of net distances between objectives

This graph is used to identify objectives on which actors take the same position (either pro or
against). The stronger the link between objectives, the higher the convergence of actors' opinions on
these objectives.
7. NET DISTANCES BETWEEN ACTORS
1. Map of net distances between actors

The map of net distances between actors is used to recognise potential alliances while taking
into account divergences and convergences between actors of order 2.
2. Graph of net distances between actors

The graph of net distances between actors is used to recognise potential alliances while taking
into account divergences and convergences between actors of order 2.

Mactor Report - Trace Mba Ory

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Mactor Report - Trace Mba Ory

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

MACTOR - TRACE Page 1 / 46

a) Semarang City Fisheries Agency (DKP SMG)

b) Marine and Fisheries Departments of Central Java Province (DKP Jateng)

c) Semarang city trade Agency (Disdag SMG)

d) Semarang city Helath Agency (Dinkes SMG)

e) National Agency of Drug and Food Control (BPOM)

f) Fish Quarantine Agency, Quality Control and Safety of Fishery Products

g) Semarang City Cooperatives and SMEs Agency (DisKop)

k) legal institute (Legal)

l) Institute for Consumer Development and Protection (LP2K)

II. OBJECTIVE PRESENTATION

III. DATA INPUT MATRICES

2. VALUED POSITION MATRIX (2MAO)

IV. RESULTS OF THE STUDY

1. Matrix of Direct and Indirect Influences (MDII)

DKP SMG 26 26 13 21 23 22 20 16 18 14 15 23 24 16 251

Values represent direct and indirect influences between actors:

2. Map of influences and dependences between actors

3. Net scale of influences (NS)

Values are relative whole numbers:

a) MDII competitiveness vector

DKP SMG 1,28

b) Histogram of MDII's competitiveness

c) MDII competitiveness scale - Objective : competitiveness

e) MDII competitiveness scale - Objective : value added fish

g) MDII competitiveness scale - Objective : income business

i) MDII competitiveness scale - Objective : public nutrition

5. Matrix of Maxima Direct and Indirect Influences

Values represent maximum direct and indirect influences between actors:

a) Histogram of MMDII's competitiveness

b) Position scale by valued objectives weighted competitiveness -

d) Position scale by valued objectives weighted competitiveness -

f) Position scale by valued objectives weighted competitiveness -

h) Position scale by valued objectives weighted competitiveness -

2. ACTORS OBJECTIVES RELATIONSHIP

a) Simple position matrix (1MAO)

-1: actor unlikely to achieve objective

a) Valued position matrix (2MAO)

b) Histogram of actor's implication towards its objectives 2MAO

a) Weighted valued position matrix (3MAO)

DKP SMG 5,1 5,1 5,1 5,1 20,4

Traders 1,5 3,1 3,1 -4,6 12,3

Positive values represent the actor's mobilisation towards its objectives.

b) Histogram of actor's mobilisation towards its objectives 3MAO

c) Weighted valued position matrix (3MAO)

DKP SMG 5,1 5,1 5,1 5,1 20,4

Traders 1,5 3,1 3,1 -4,6 12,3

Positive values represent the actor's mobilisation towards its objectives.

3. CONVERGENCE BETWEEN ACTORS

a) Convergence matrix (1CAA)

b) Map of order 1 convergences between actors

c) Graph of order 1 convergences between actors

a) Valued convergence matrix (2CAA)

b) Map of order 2 convergences between actors

c) Graph of order 2 convergences between actors

a) Weighted valued convergence matrix (3CAA)

b) Map of order 3 convergences between actors

c) Graph of order 3 convergences between actors

4. DIVERGENCE BETWEEN ACTORS

a) Divergence matrix (1DAA)

b) Map of order 1 divergences between actors

c) Graph of order 1 divergences between actors