2 & 8

EAK2000
8

asextos@civil.auth.gr

,
2 2011

 2 & 8

8 ( 1
5) 2000 & 8
, ,

1. 2. & 3. &

4. &

5.1

 2 & 8

0-9
9 ((1990-1999)
99 999)
1990: 0 -
1991: 1 -
1992: 2 -

1993: 3 -
1994: 4 -

1995: 5 -
1996: 6 -

1997: 7 -
1998: 8 -
1999:

9 -

1. 2. & 3. &

4. &

5.4

 2 & 8

8 ((EN 1998)
99 ) M
((Parts))
EN 1998-1: ,
EN 1998-2:
EN 1998-3:

EN 1998-4:
8

EN 1998-5: ,

EN 1998-6: ,

.

1. 2. & 3. &

4. &

5.4

 2 & 8

8-
1 ((EN1998-1)
99 )

1:


2:

3:
( EN 1998-2
EN 1998-6 , )
4: ( )
5: .
6:
7:

8: .
9: .
10:
( )
:
: -
(pushover)
:
-
1. 2. & 3. &

4. &

5.4

 2 & 8

8-1 ((EN1998-1)
99 )

,

(
) , ,
.

:

(PGA/ag)
S,
S TB,
TB TC,
TC TD &




.

d .



q

1. 2. & 3. &

4. &

5.4

 2 & 8

2.


&

1. 2. &

3. &

4. &

5.4

 2 & 8

((1/2)
/ )
-

(PR) 10% 50 (TL),
TR 475 :
-TL / ln(1- PR) = TR => -50/ln(1-0.1) = 475

1. 2. &

3. &

4. &

5.4

 2 & 8

((2/2)
/ )
.

(10% 10

95 ),
)






.
TL / ln(1
ln(1- PR) = TR =>
> -10/ln(1-0.1)
10/ln(1 0.1) = 95
-T

0.8 < <1.4

1. 2. &

3. &

4. &

5.4

 2 & 8

((

)
)

1.

((

)
)

2. (
)

1. 2. &

3. &

4. &

10

5.4

 2 & 8

3.
&

1. 2. &

3. &

4. &

11

5.4

 2 & 8

1. 2. &

3. &

4. &

12

5.4

 2 & 8

2000 &

* Vs

1. 2. &

3. &

4. &

13

5.4

 2 & 8

Vs,30

3.1.1. (4)

/ ,

NSPT
:

((

)

,
, C
,
,
...

S1 S2,

1. 2. &

3. &

4. &

14

5.4

 2 & 8

:
2000

2002 - 2003

,

,
TYPE 2

TYPE 1 3 4
g .



1-1-2004.
4
1. 2. &

3. &

4. &

15

5.4

 2 & 8

0.16g
0.16g

0.24g
0.24g
0.36g

0.16g
g

0.24g

TYPE 1

1. 2. &

3. &

(

2003)

gR (%g)

Z1

0.16

Z2

0.24

Z3

0 36
0.36

:


TYPE 2 (. )


40%

4. &

16

5.4

 2 & 8

S =
g =
=
TB, TC, TD =

1. 2. &

3. &

4. &

17

5.4

 2 & 8

/
/

(1/)

(1/2)

1. 2. &

3. &

4. &

18

5.4

 2 & 8

8
8 2000
8 4
2000 3

( 3 ) 2 ( 4 )
2000 2/3
PGA


2000

1. 2. &

3. &

4. &

19

5.4

 2 & 8

8
T 1:

Ms > 5.5

T 2:

Ms 5.5

* 5%

1. 2. &

3. &

* 5%

4. &

20

5.4

 2 & 8

8
T 1:

Ms > 5.5

T 2:

Ms 5.5

1 2 EC8, PGA
10 km
Ambraseys et al.(1996),

(B
h 2006)
6)

(Bommer & Pi
Pinho,
1. 2. &

3. &

4. &

21

5.4

 2 & 8

8
T 1:

Ms > 5.5

T 2:

Ms 5.5

1 2: .

1 2 : (

T=0),,


.
1. 2. &

3. &

4. &

22

5.4

 2 & 8

T 1 (Ms > 5.5) T 2 (Ms <= 5.5)



?
4.3.3.5.2
avgg>0.25g :
> 20m
> 5m




1. 2. &

3. &

4. &

23

5.4

 2 & 8

PGA

PGA (
(
90%
2000 70%).

( TB, TC, TD)

2000 &

1. 2. &

3. &

4. &

24

5.4

 2 & 8

Chi-Chi
Chi Chi (Taiwan), Imperial Valley (U.S.), Kocaeli
(Turkey), Northridge (U.S.)
1. 2. &

3. &

4. &

25

5.4

 2 & 8

3.2.2.5

,

,


(
).
.

q.

1. 2. &

3. &

4. &

26

5.4

 2 & 8

q (
2000 & 8)
, 2000
3.5 /

8
(
)
3.90 5.85
( & ) 2.75 - 4.15

-
(
( )

q

,

1. 2. &

3. &

5.4

4. &

27

5.4

 2 & 8

8 & 2000

2 2000 2/3

2000

q ( )

2000

(
( g)

20% ag 2000 25% ag

1. 2. &

3. &

4. &

28

5.4

 2 & 8

(
10sec )
:

(1) 3 .
(2) =0
g*S
(3) 0.2T1 2T1
2T1, T1
,

90%

1. 2. &

3. &

4. &

29

5.4

 2 & 8

y)

14

1
( 0.6 sec)

12

Design sp.
Mean Spectra
0.90*Design sp.
Alkion(1) 1
1-A
A
Alkion(1) 1-B

10

Kalamata 10-A
Kalamata 10-B

Sa
a(m /sec2)

Ionian(3) 11-A
8

Ionian(3) 11-B

(..
>0 8sec)
>0.8sec)

90%
8
0.21<<2.01 . 0.12<<1.2

0
0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

T(sec)

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

Sextos et al. (2010) Soil Dynamics & Earthquake

Engineering

1. 2. &

3. &

4. &

30

5.4

 2 & 8

4.

1. 2. &

3. &

4. &

31

5.4

 2 & 8

: 4.2.1
:
4.4.2
4 4 & 4.4.3
443
1.
2. ,

3.
2

&

4.

5.

1. 2. &

3. &

6.

4. &

32

5.4

 2 & 8

,
(
)

q,

-

2D

2D

(x0.8)

3D

3D

(x0.8)

1. 2. &

3. &

( )

4. &

33

5.4

 2 & 8

1. ( ) = lmax/lmin < 4
2. eox 0.30 rx
:
eox = ,
x,
rx =

y ((

),

) ls

( ()
,
() )
rx ls

,
. ,
3.3.3 2000
1. 2. &

3. &

4. &

34

5.4

 2 & 8

q x 0.8

 2 & 8

EI
:
Ei = 2i

1. 2. &

3. &

4. &

36

5.4

 2 & 8

8 4
4.3.1
3 (7)

2000
:

2/3 ,

E
.

1/10
.

-:
8 4.3.1 (8)

(

-)
,

*
*

(T>0.4s), <0.4s
1. 2. &

3. &

4. &

37

5.4

Fb S d T1 m 4.3.3.2.2 1P

2 & 8

(
).
,

2000

( )

<40m: = Ct H3/4

( )
:

k
90%

:
90%

- (pushover)

-
().

-
((

1. 2. &

3. &

4. &

38

5.4

 2 & 8

(p
(pushover))

pushover
:


u/a1 ( q)

EN1998-3

1. 2. &

3. &

4. &

39

5.4

 2 & 8

-
(pushover):

1.

(
, )
2.


.

3
3.

,,


.
4.

5.

( )
((

)
1. 2. &

3. &

()

4. &

40

5.4

 2 & 8

4.3.5

((..
,

, ,

, ,
,

, , , )
, ,

,

1. 2. &

3. &

4. &

41

5.4

 2 & 8

5
5.
5.4

1. 2. &

3. &

4. &

42

5.4

 2 & 8

8
%

100%

0%

(
()
)

65%

35%

()

35%

65%

()

()

0%

100%

()

1. 2. &

3. &

4. &

43

5.4

 2 & 8

8 2 K ()
(

()
()
1.5<q<3.9

(Y)
q>4.0

2.0<q<5.85

:







V 2 3
3,

1. 2. &

3. &

4. &

44

5.4

 2 & 8

(()
)
q ((1/5)
/5)
q,
:

:
q0 = ,


5.2.2

, qo 20%
q>1.5

1. 2. &

3. &

4. &

45

5.4

 2 & 8

(()
)
q ((2/5)
/5)
q,
:

,
.
=

,

-

auxVd
a1xVd

1. 2. &

3. &

4. &

46

5.4

 2 & 8

(()
)
q (3/5)
q,
:

.
: u/1=1.1
1.2
: u/1=1.2
:
u/1=1.3
.

: u/1=1.0

u/
/ 1=1.1

: u/1=1.2

1. 2. &

3. &

4. &

47

5.4

 2 & 8

(()
)
q (4/5)
q,
:

1,00,

(1+0)/3<1, 0,5,

():

hwi
lwi

= i
=

hwi/lWi i

,
1. 2. &

3. &

4. &

48

5.4

 2 & 8

() q (5/5)
q

, . (2006)
1. 2. &

3. &

4. &

49

5.4

 2 & 8

8 & 2000

, , (2010)
1. 2. &

3. &

4. &

50

5.4

 2 & 8

8 & 2000

1. 2. &

3. &

4. &

51

5.4

 2 & 8

8 & 2000

1. 2. &

3. &

4. &

52

5.4

 2 & 8

8 & 2000

1. 2. &

3. &

4. &

53

5.4

 2 & 8

8 & 2000

1. 2. &

3. &

4. &

54

5.4

 2 & 8

8 & 2000

1. 2. &

3. &

4. &

55

5.4

 2 & 8

8 & 2000

1. 2. &

3. &

4. &

56

5.4

 2 & 8

8 & 2000

1. 2. &

3. &

4. &

57

5.4

 2 & 8

8 & 2000


8
2000 , ,
, .

8

2000

() 8
2000
()


((

8 )
() ( )

,
,

1. 2. &

3. &

4. &

58

5.4

 2 & 8

, ., , ., , . , . , . , ., ,
. (2008)
EC8
, 3o & 57
, 2057.
, . (2010)
EC2 & EC8
EC8 , .
Elghazouli A. (2009) Seismic design of buildings to Eurocode 8, Elghazouli A, ed., Spon Press.
, ., , . (2010) 8: ,
1: , , .
& ... - 6/12/2010 - , 1, 2 8.
Fardis MN (2009) Seismic Design, Assessment and Retrofit of Concrete Buildings, based on
Eurocode 8, Springer.
Panagiotakos, . . and M.N. Fardis (2004) Seismic Performance of RC Frames Designed to
Eurocode 8 or to the Greek Codes 2000, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, No 2, 221259, 2004.
. (2006) ,
5 , .
Sextos,
S t
A Katsanos,
A.,
K t
E and
E.
d Manolis,
M
li G.
G (2010)
(
) EC8-based
EC8 b d earthquake
th
k selection
l ti
procedure
d
evaluation: validation study based on observed damage of an irregular R/C building, Soil Dynamics &
Earthquake Engineering, 31(4), 583-597.

1. 2. &

3. &

4. &

59

5.4