IN THE COURT OF Aoorrona, SESSION JUDGE DWARKA, BELA BAIL APPLICATION I 0. oF 2020 iF F, ik No. 0574 OF 2020 i [pared 19.08.2020 s}ATE vs. ASHISH THAKUR P.S, PALAM VILLAGE, DELHI DISRICT SOUTH WEST i | UIS 376/506 RPC IN THE MATTER OF: i i | Ashish Thakur : Applicant Versus) | State/Govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi |_|. Respondent Hert ok a "Applicant Through vi ow } Nonu S. Khera, M. Ahsan Kh JK-212/09, sKa5r8 Advocates. Ch. No. 14, J & K High Court, Court Complex Janipur, Jammu-180007 M. No, 7889447408/7889621481 Mail ID. advocatenonukhera@amail.com New Delhi: Dated | (99.2020 aDWARKA, DELHI BAIL APPLICATIONNO.: |. OF 2020 +) F.LR, NO. 0574 OF 2020 t | DATED 19.08.2020 STATE vs. ASHISH THAKUR Ps. PALAM VILLAGE, DELHI ' DISRICT SOUTH WEST UIS. 376/508 RPG IN THE MATTER OF: Ashish Thakur «Applicant Versus ¥ State/Govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi: .. Respondent INDEX 7 S. | Particulars [Page | No. CoB) No. 1. | First Anticipatory Bail application Ti8 u/s 438 Cr.P.C. with Affidavit 2. | Annexure:A-1 20-33 Copy of the FIR No. 0674, dated 19.08.2020, P.S. Palam Village, Delhi. : vet 3. | Annexure:A-2(Coll 7 re Copy of the Fb Messenger &Copy of the some of | 34-43 the screen shots of the posts between the parties” 4. | Annexure:A-3 Copy of the legal notice.dated-11,05.2020.by-the | 44-50 applicant to the complainantte a | 5. | Annexure:A-4 1. feat | | Copy of the complaints at. 08,05,2020. 51-61 6. | Annexure:A-5(Coll I Copy of the complaint 08.05.: 2020: aipaowith 62-78 receipts. 7. | Annexure:A-6 Copy of the SMS ‘dated 13- 14. 09.2020: send by! 79-86 Rajan Devi to the applicant, | | 8. | Annexure:A-7 i fl Copy of the some screenshots'w.r.t..the sending of | 87-96 the location along with other screenshots. Annexure:A8 Copy of the Relevant portion of the list of the candidates in merit as per ACC written} 97-98 examination result in which the applicant is also figuring at S. No. 2816. 11. | Certificate ‘A’. a 99 (72. [Certificates 100 13. | Vakalatnama , 101 Applicant Through Nonu 8. Khera; Magan K JK-212108, 4 2. Singh D-875/12 ” Advocates. "Ch. No. 14, J & K High Court, Court ‘Compiex Janipur, ‘Jammu-180007 _M.No..7889447408/788962 1481 Mail ID. advocatenionukhera@gmail.com New Delhi: Dated [,. 09.2020IN THE COURT OF ADDITIONAL SESSION JUDGE DWARKA, DELHI BAIL APPLICATION NO. OF 2020 In the Matter of: Ashish Thakur S/O Mool Raj F.1.R. NO. 0574 OF 2020 DATED 19.08.2020 STATE vs. ASHISH THAKUR PS PALAM VILLAGE, DELHI DISRICT SOUTH WEST U/S 376/506 IPC R/O Bhallessa District Doda, UT of J&K . Applicant vis State/Govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi In-charge, Police Station, Palam Village, South West, Delhi. ...Respondent In the Matter of:- FIRST ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 OF Cr.P.C. ON BEHALF OF THE APPLICANT: MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH: The applicant most humbly and respectfully submits as under:-That the present application has been filed under section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for grant of anticipatory bail as the applicant apprehend her arrest in connection with F.I.R no 0574/2020 Dated 19.08.2020 of Police Station Palam Village under section 376/506 |.P.C. A copy of the abovementioned FIR is annexed herewith as Annexure:A-1. That the applicant is a permanent resident of the UT of Jammu and Kashmir and a peace loving citizen of India, who is presently serving in Indian Army. That the applicant has never committed any offence in his life but a false and a frivolous case has been registered against him at police station village Palam under F.I.R no 0574/2020 Dated 19.08.2020 of Police Station Palam Village under section 376/506 R.P.C. That the applicant came in contact of the complainant namely Rajan Devi through social media (whatsapp) in the year 2019 and Rajan Devi in pursuance of a conspiracy to trap the applicant became good friend of the applicant. That the said complainant Rajan Devi used to chat with the applicant and soon Rajan Devi took the applicant into full confidence and the applicant developed likingfor Rajan Devi without knowing about her extremely wicked or villainous designs who by her seductive acts made the applicant to propose her the for marriage. Itis worth mentioning here that the applicant is a simple young person serving in the Indian Army and had an intention to marry a faithful girl of his choice in order to live a happy married life and due to such an intention the applicant had proposed Rajan Devi for marriage. That the complainant Rajan Devi before the said act of proposal for marriage by the applicant had disclosed the applicant that she is virgin and looking for a suitable match and belongs to a reputed family. That the complainant Rajan Devi readily accepted the proposal of the applicant and both the parties decided to meet at Delhi and the applicant asked Rajan Devi to talk to her parents about applicant so that the elders from both the families can meet and decide further about the marriage of the parties as per customs but Rajan Devi started making excuses by saying that the same is not possible as her mother is presently ill and she will talk to them on the right time. It is worth mentioning here that Rajan Devi had also capturedsome selfie/photographs with the applicant during this meeting. That the applicant due to the said excuses became a little suspicious and enquired about Rajan Devi and became shocked to know that Rajan Devi is a divorcee and not virgin as disclosed by Rajan Devi. That the applicant thereafter again enquired from Rajan Devi about her marital status upon which Rajan Devi admitted that she is a divorcee and not virgin. The applicant then told Rajan Devi that she has betrayed the applicant by not disclosing the same to him earlier and further told her that he had already told her that the applicant always wanted to marry a simple virgin girl and never wanted to marry a divorcee but Rajan Devi being very cunning person controlled the situation by emotionally blackmailing the applicant through her chats and on phone/video calls by saying that her love is true and she had not disclosed her marital status to the applicant. as she never wanted to loose the applicant and further through her art of seduction made the applicant to agree to marry Rajan Devi despite she being a divorcee. .10. That soon thereafter the applicant came to know that 11. the complainant Rajan Devi_ is not only a divorcee but also a mother of two kids from her ex-husband and the same was very shocking for the applicant who felt fully betrayed and upon this the applicant clearly told Rajan Devi that she has not only betrayed the applicant but also played with the emotions of the applicant and as such the marriage between the applicant and Rajan Devi is not possible. Rajan Devi again tried to convince the applicant by her seductive talks full of fake affection but this time the applicant clearly told Rajan Devi that neither he is interested to marry a divorcee with two kids and take their responsibility by forgetting the chances of having his own kids in future nor this shall be acceptable to his family. The applicant further told Rajan Devi that he would never have proposed Rajan Devi_ if she-would have disclosed the truth to the applicant that she is a divorcee with two kids born out of her wedlock with her ex-husband. That since then. the complainant Rajan Devi is continuously blackmailing the applicant by saying that she will forcefully make the applicant to marry her or else Rajan Devi will destroy the reputation of the applicant and his family and even threatened that Rajan12 13. Devi shall also implicate the applicant into false and frivolous criminal case in order to completely destroy the applicant as the applicant is a government employee serving in the Indian Army. That the complainant Rajan Devi has even falsely claimed herself to be the legally wedded wife of the applicant on the social media (Fb Messenger) and has also threatened the applicant that she will go to any extent to force the applicant to marry her and accept her two kids. When the applicant asked Rajan Devi to not to blackmail him then Rajan Devi told the applicant to either marry Rajan Devi or her sister or in an alternate pay a sum of Rs. 5,00,000/- to her. Copy of the said Fb Messenger is annexed herewith as Annexure:A-2, That the applicant, has clearly told the complainant Rajan Devi to stop blackmailing him as-he is not going to fulfill any of the illegitimate demands of Rajan Devi and to further get trapped by her but thereafter Rajan Devi started putting her edited photographs with the applicant on the social media and writing defamatory comments about the applicant, Some of the screen14. 15. 16. shots of the said posts are annexed collectively herewith as Annexure:A-2(Colly). That the applicant even send a legal notice to the complainant Rajan Devi and called upon her to stop posting anything w.r.t the applicant on sdcial media and to delete all such posts w.r.t the applicant and further to stop messaging or calling the applicant and extorting him but all in vain. The copy of the said legal notice is annexed herewith as Annex That Rajan Devi has even uploaded the picture of the house of the applicant on her facebook account with a comment “MujheSaajjan Kay GharJaanaHai. (Copy annexed in Annexure:A-2) and many of the local friends and relatives of the applicant residing at Doda have come to know about the same as well as other defamatory content posted by the complainant Rajan Devi on her social media accounts and have many times asked the applicant about the same. That the applicant has also lodged various complaints against Rajan Devi before The SHO Doda J&K, The SHO Police station GandohDoda, The SSP Doda, The SSP Crime Branch Jammu, Inspector General Jammu, DIG crime Branch J&K, The SHO Cyber Crime Cell17. Jammu, The SHO Rohtak Haryana, The SSP Crime Branch Haryana and The DGP Haryana, ADGP Grievance Cyber Cell Haryana, The SP Crime Branch Panchkula Haryana which were sent via E-mail and Registered post on dated 12.05.2020 in. which enquiry is under process. The copy of one of the said complaints along with receipts of all the complaints are annexed here with as Annexure:A-4 & A:5 (Colly) respectively. That in one such complaint Rohtak Police even has called Rajan Devi to enquire about the matter but meanwhile Rajan Devi has lodged the above mentioned false and frivolous FIR against the applicant alleging that the applicant has made physical relations with her on pretext of marriage whereas the truth is that this is a typical case of the misuse of the law particularly section 376 IPC by a lady like Rajan Devi as a tool to pressurize the men like the applicant to surrender before her and to accept the illegitimate demands. This is even evinced from the messages which Rajan Devi has send as SMS to the applicant even after the lodging of FIR. The copy of the said SMS dated 13- 14.09.2020 is annexed here with as Annexure:A-6.18. 19. That it is worth mentioning here that it was always the complainant who insisted the applicant to visit at her locations many times which the applicant even resisted. The applicant is having the screen shot of one such conversation with the complainant in which she has sent her location to the applicant and asked him to visit her on that location and the applicant has resisted the same. The applicant is also having the copy of some more screenshots which prove that the applicant is innocent and it is the complainant who has blackmailed the applicant by lodging the above mentioned false and frivolous FIR. The copy of the said screen shot w.r.t the sending of the location along with other screenshots are annexed herewith as Annexure:A-7. That from the perusal of the facts & considering both sides of the coin it can be observed that the applicant never had any dishonest intention to take advantage of the complainant in any manner whatsoever and the applicant initially really intended to .marry. the complainant but the circumstances went beyond the control of the applicant when he came to know that he has been fully deceived by the complainant by non- disclosure of the marital status i.e. divorcee by the20. 21. 22, 23. 13 \o complainant and also the non-disclosure. of the facts. by the complainant that she is the mother of two children. That the complainant Rajan Devi has nowhere said that she has been raped forcefully without her consent and there is no such mentioning about any kind of resistance by her which also points towards the frivolity of the complaint against the petitioner which has been lodged with a mala-fide intention to pressurize the applicant to surrender himself before the complainant. That the age of the complainant is 30 years as per FIR and is not a minor. Moreover the applicant is lesser in age than the complainant by more than 5 years. That the applicant is having enough material to prove his innocence in the form of recorded conversations, whatsapp and sms. chats, etc. which prove that it is the complainant who has betrayed the applicant and has spoiled the life of the applicant just in few months of coming in contact of the applicant and if the applicant is granted anticipatory bail then he shall fully cooperate with the investigation officer and hand over the same to him. That the applicant is a brilliant army personal and has passed his Army Cadet College (ACC) written test and24, 25. 4 NV is about to face his interview and if in case the anticipatory bail is-not granted to him then whole of his career shall be ruined as the applicant will become overage if this opportunity of clearing the interview is snatched from him. Copy of the Relevant portion of the list of the candidates in merit as per ACC written examination result in which the applicant is also figuring at S. No. 2816 is annexed herewith as Annexure:A-8. That the petitioner is presenting the present application for the grant of anticipatory bail with clean & folded hands with a prime intention to cooperate with the investigating agency so that the investigation is completed early and fairly and the career of the petitioner, who is serving in Indian Army is also not ruined unnecessarily and without any fault of the petitioner. That the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India and Various Hon'ble High Courts have held that a person should not be deprived of his personal liberty which is a very precious fundamental right and should be curtailed only in exceptional circumstances. Recently The Hon’ble Supreme Court in “Siddharam Satlingappa Mehtre VIS State of Maharashtra &Ors” LAW HERALDte 2011(2), (Supreme Court) Page no 1333 and AIR 2011, SC Page no. 312, has held in para 3:- “The order granting or refusing bail must reflect a perfect balance between conflicting interest, namely, sanctity of individual liberty and the interest of the society. The law of bails dovetails to the conflicting interests namely, on the other hand the requirement of shielding the society from the hazards of those committing crimes and potentiality of repeating the same crime while on bail and on the other hand absolute adherence of fundamental principal of criminal Jurisprudence regarding presumption of innocence of an accused until he is found guilty and the sanctity of individual liberty.” In the present case the petitioner is a respectable citizen serving in the Indian Army, having no potential of committing any crime while on bail and is also presumed to be innocent. In para no 122 of the above quoted judgment the Hon'ble Supreme Court has held:- “The following factors and parameters can be taken in to consideration while dealing with anticipatory bail:- | The nature and gravity of the accusation and the exact role of the accused must be properly comprehended before the arrest is made. I The antecedents of the petitioner including the fact as to whether the accused has previously undergone imprisonment on conviction by a court in respect of any cognizable offence. li. The possibility of the petitioner to flee from justice. 15Vv. VI. Vit. VIN. Ix. \3 The possibility of the accused likelihood to repeat similar or other offences. Where the accusations have been made only with the object of injuring or humiliating the petitioner by arresting him or her. The impact of the grant of anticipatory bail particularly in cases of large magnitude affecting a very large number of people. The court must evaluate the entire available material against the accused very carefully. The court must also clearly comprehend the clear role of the accused in the case. The cases in which the accused is implicated with the help of section 34 and 149 of I.P.C, the court should consider with even greater care and caution because over implication in the cases is a matter of common knowledge and concern. While considering the prayer for the grant of the anticipatory bail, a balance has to be struck between two factors namely, no prejudice. should be caused to the free, fair and full investigation and there should be the prevention of harassment humiliation and unjustified detention of the accused. The court to consider reasonable apprehension of tempering of the witness or apprehension of threat to the complainant. Frivolity in prosecution should always be considered and it is only the element of genuineness that shall have to be considered in the matter of the grant of bail and in the event of there being some doubt as to the genuineness of“F v \M the prosecution, in the normal course of events the accused is entitled to an order of bail.” In the present case of the petitioner, there are many contradictions in the statements of the complainant and the prosecutrix in.F.I.R and the statements recorded under section 161 and 164-A Cr.P.C (submitted below in grounds) which clearly points towards the frivolity of the complaint against the petitioner. In Para 128 of the above quoted recent judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court, it has been held:- “In case, the state consider the following suggestions in proper prospective then perhaps it. may not be necessary to curtail the personal liberty of the accused in a routine manner. These suggestions are only illustrative and not exhaustive. . Direct the accused to join investigation and only when the accused does not cooperate with the investigating agency, then only the accused be arrested. pat Seize either the passport or such other documents, such as, the title deeds of properties or the fixed deposit receipts/share certificates of the accused. e Direct the accused to execute bonds; ea! The accused may be directed to furnish sureties of number of persons which according to the prosecution are necessary in view of the facts of the particular case. The accused be directed to furnish undertaking a that he would not visit the place where the\s witnesses reside so that the possibility of tempering the evidence or otherwise influencing the course of justice can be avoided. 6. Bank accounts be frozen for small duration during the investigation” The petitioner may also. be dealt in light of the above Para of the above quoted judgment so that the career of the petitioner is saved and the ends of justice are also secured. The Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in “Sanjay Chandra V. CBI” Law Herald, 2012(1) Page no 113, has recently held in Para no 16: 18 “This court, time and again, stated has stated that bail is rule and committal to jail an exception. It is also observed that refusal of bail is a restriction on the personal liberty of the individual guaranteed under Article 21 of the constitution. In the case of State of Rajasthan V. Balchand, (1977) 4 SCC 308, this court opined: “2. The basic rule may perhaps be tersely put as bail, not jail except where there are circumstances suggestive of fleeing from justice or thwarting the course of justice or creating other troubles in the shape of repeating the offences or intimidating witnesses and the like, by the petitioner who seeks enlargement on bail from the court. We do not intend to be exhaustive but only illustrative.” The Para no 20 of the above quoted judgment is as under:-ep 26. 27. 19 \6 “20. InMoti Ram V. State of M.P (1978) 4 SCC 47, this court, while discussing pre-trial detention, held: “14. The consequences of pre-trial detention are grave. Rajan Devi s presumed innocent arc subjected to the psychological and physical deprivations of jail life, usually under more onerous conditions then are imposed on convicted Rajan Devi s. The jailed Rajan Devi s loses his job if he has one and is prevented from contributing to the preparation of his defense. Equally important, the burden of his detention frequently falls heavily on the innocent members of his family.” That Various Hon'ble High Courts, under similar circumstances have granted anticipatory bail to the accused persons against whom similar FIRs have been registered under section 420/376 IPC/RPC and the petitioner places reliance upon the those decisions which the Hon'ble court may consider. That as the petitioner is a respectable person and is serving in belt force, his arrest shall cause irreparable loss to his social status and service and shall bring unnecessary stigma on his carrier and image and furthermore the petitioner shall suffer irreparable loss if he shall be arrested by the respondent whereas the liberty of the petitioner shall in no way come to the way investigation in the above said case.28. 29. I That the petitioner undertakes to abide by any condition which the Hon'ble court may impose while granting bail to the petitioner and to join the investigation and to present himself before the Court as and when directed. That the applicant has not filed any other such or similar application before any other court against the same relief except the present case. PRAYER It is therefore most respectfully prayed that this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to: 20 That the applicants may kindly be released on anticipatory bail in regard to F.I.R No 0574 of 2020 Dated 19.08.2020 registered against the applicant at Police Station Palam village, New Delhi, so that the applicant cooperates during the investigation and. the service career of the applicant is also saved in the interest of Justice. S.H.O. may be directed to release the applicant on bail in case of arrest on personal ground.tii. \8 Any other order which the court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may be also passed in favor of the applicant. APPLICANT THROUGH Now vhs Nonu S. Khera, M. Ahsan Khanji& Ranjeet K. Singh JK-212/09, JK-45/18 D-875/12 Advocates. Ch. No. 14, J & K High Court, Court Complex Janipur, Jammu-180007 M. No. 7889447408/788962 1481 Mail ID. advocatenonukhera@amail.com New Delhi: Dated [{, 09.2020 21- = a BEFORE THE COURT-OF ADDITIONAL SESSIONS Yes x fe JUDGE, Bw JRTS, SOUTH DELHI BAIL APPLICATIONNO!- || OF 2020 i IN THE MATTER OF: : Ashish Thakur © a. Applicant Versus State/Govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi 4. Respondent AFFIDAVIT 1, Ashish Thakur, aged 25 years, s/oMool Raj, R/O Bhallessa District Doda, UT of J&K, presently at New Delhi, do hereby i solemnly affirm and state as under: 1. That | am the applicant in the above said case and | am conversant with the facts of the case, hence competent to swear this affidavit. iN) That the contents of the accompanying application is read over to me in Hindi Vernacular language and | have understood the contents thereof. The facts stated therein are true andicotfect to the best of my knowledge and belief. > 3 That the Annexures annexed herewith true copies of their respective originals: . u DEPONENT {aentified by VERIFICATION: Verified at New Delhi on this ‘thé 13":day of September, 2020, that the contents of the above affidavit is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. No part of it is false and nothing material haé been concealed therefrom Certified thatthe above Niémed : c 1 Identity by ShriSme LV Peele wi Solemenly affirmed before me al pete S.No., besa road & explained to me are trud dnd ‘correct Nc "y$ 22 Anansi fod HIRST INFORMATION REPORT Uae erat oa fa Te RANE HEH RAMEN RI EY RAO SLAM vee shat vamENE) io2h FIR MORN ah yeene fate vs snes eaten Seen t ecumeton 0 Once Orca ae mae NTTRIVETONG HAY Ran Pomona Gre Teteare ney ost: Te Pati 9 iy Tare For gem es Te Tava it an besbibdacactat tedinictleiuaac init iad .0 13 teaver itt = 1 Fire FR Fs 2 Day Maturing (ae fny Ma sttieae) ome pane reetheresngy init fe sibessatson SHE 2 pi Cheeurrsage ENE | hice on ondary Bs Aree r ‘sat nore > = tm utah She mit ot Pace Sexton ‘oe se BSN nn “ Svrsinant sustaranaa Thaannayelgareet onset) BAMAR TIES HE Gh Se ARR eerie of ie i A sah ey Soeanaitywifiorin, NE Josey we ANTE A Dam a ene cuit on Sth ‘vaaca eh tonne tine or inenaNrOr: OES. BR AR 2 NM ARLE MEDEA Bh ae ka lookin a tnasen aoe canara ent Hl parton a i rh nine oseoslon tes upton 4 ths sometaninpitoene SPH" TE 9 Pies of tha sen svs4ine ON tacts aac wpa noes ae "he 61! Capety trottsacrgian sean vata pry "<0 ol iy ce ET Sm et SN MAI a By 1 eM aha tee AO ame, te SE2N\ 19 71) Costas (aac egies, Meguro cm HR mae Te Tn $46 FS. Patary tage, New Goll, Adgress No. AZE-03, STREET NDA MAH oe : i . est. i he VIR ENV: MEG DEL Hi-+ 10046 Contact No 81824075192 Appleton tor registration of cash against dats tha a eae Som af Bost ay vas Mant cl wkagn Solow Tatra Gartoah Distt tod tac ne B6Z21347 14 , for coment ey art esoat hth iment apptcen| Si, The sopeaet rampectlly mitemts ae ee L Thu sppteant respecitulty submits aa under. ‘That apaiicaent is Law being eitlaity and hed raver indulged any nefeous activites, The anpbicars wits daing her busiiess at Bathinda isa singie mother ut twe luda. That ASHISH THAKUR who ix moni braing 10, 962243674 uid fo send messages (e upyisant on neguiat bawk eidicy. Th, #2? apphcaris ani applicant raver uted te roply the mesenger send AGHISH THAKUR gic cetape of sence rutin: messages 1 ihe RepTRibIe paRwGN Had newer uae sec ety teary slain abwapl intend not it inmelve hearse! vareiske PeinOnsnip of ove offur uo she always wanted to settie her Ws atter marrying a mucmisthle paniin and sppleant alse disciogad the tiel to ASHIEH THAKUR, This canbe.stse be wensd tor fhe end conversation Held Setwaen ASHISH THAKUR and appteant on them sespectioe weitsang numbers. The tecor! of Serwonshals ara also eltached herewith for your kind eonsidoriicr urs aousal. Ever applicant on very fitst Autlio and Video cals disnlase to ASHISH THARUR regurain, ‘sofas having if bvo Kids and ASHISH THAKUR élso talk t0.kide of apploant, The aude raccsifig 6% tonan’a are. avallable with appheant. ASHISH THAKUR always insisted appteantio meet Perm berche hut applizant always relused in gonulne demand of ASHISH THAKUR. That applicant i stcirotands thats 8 fake alarm glvan by ASHISH THAKUR just to Chest applicant and applicant aie i jpondod the masséges send by ASHISH THAKUR, 2. That again om 27in October, 2018 rsar 1a ASHISH THAKUR again started sending messages {9 anplicant on one prafeed or the arolher asl dip started qivmg wede calls-te applicant wich apnktant never gett 46 DIck and-ansbver te vests AGMIBK THARRE always prawurized appknant io attend his wade calls (a whieh applet witha AGMIS, iste appieant wtsie saying Malt he fall an zove ita Naki ‘ee veoitieg tb appnean wre hare alga ASHIESt THAKUR, disclgse hea KASH THAKLEE Thar applica ueatd bo visit her native house at H i nat teria ABHISH THAKUR ud givar adap nals abd whiltsanip cals ane other rots ontinir: inciet and ASHISH THAKUR also talkest to Wee siiler, Shabl aed Mes ef applicant ed vance ait the Ianiily members of applicant that he is sesious about the telationship and want iat Cs ap CANNEL even alter nEappbcant wed lo make ASHISH THAKUR unaerated ISH THAIUR will nat accept her sister along wilh fea chilfren oe, apical ust agp ace ath ap YehE nang nthe tne gales ‘hal mootiely Pastore ot A voir AEHIGk THAKUR, covringe aistes of applieant inal ha himuel! wij handle (ray kle aier Gover ak Alter limiening thes love falks pT AGHISH THAKUR . ppieant minted developing feaing nn: ASHISH THAKUR, tor WHGh ASHISH THAKUR misused tie emadioni ang Medngy a variand ASHISH THAKUR also requenlod applicant that sho shade Inform ASHISH THAKLR {ysenaver she wil visit her residance at Dethi,.as he want to vist Delhi TO MEET HER. Alter this ‘osgitign ASHISH THAKUR stared caling applicant day and right and tled Ie corkvion applies! frat athe ahd ersaratly meet hin iG kigw. tien hatte: on whlell apstinans gone 10. CRHhIoT Sore pvorengty ASHISM "MAKOR sequniing machine Dein ar: whet ASHISH THAKUR, J59 SCN ENCLAVE, NEW DELHI) ot eppbeant where i agpticand that AGHISH THAKUR Long applicant ds Jagalty wedded wibi and wks stoned culling apeieant nit ay Rajan Dew Sut & THAKUR, At Ook ASHISH THAKUR made phyneal rointionship vith applicant en tive pretest &* a “i SeslALEN savinmy a aM ANNEXURE:A-1 FIRST INFORMATION REPORT Under Section 184, Cr.P.C. Distt. Sourt West P.S. Palam Village Year: 2020 FIR No. 0674 Date 19.08.2020 Acts. Sections IPC 1860 376/506 Occurrence of offence: Day: Intervening Day Date from: 25.01.2020 Date to: 16.03.2020 Time Period: Time from: Time to: 20:00 hrs. 00:00 hrs. Information received at P.S. Date: 19.08.2020 Time: 19:20 hrs. General Diary Reference: Entry No.: 079A Date & Time: 19.08.2020 19:21 Type of Information: Written Place of Occurrence: Direction and distance from P.S. NA. 1.5 km. Beat No.1011 12. 28 Address: RZF-63, Gali No.3, Mahavir Enclave, New Delhi In case, outside the limit of this Police Station, then: Name of P.S. District(State): Complainant / Informant : Name RajanDevi(D/o) Sh. Parkash Date/ Year of Birth: 1990 Nationality: India Passport No. Date of Issue: Occupation: Address: RZF-63, Gali No.3, Mahavir Enclave, New Delhi, Palam Village, South West, Delhi, India Details of known/suspected/unknown accused with full particulars(attach separate sheet if necessary): Ashish Thakur, (S/o) Bodh Raj, R/o Gowallow, Gandosh, Doda, Jammu & Kashmir, Palam Village, South West, Delhi, India. Reasons for delay in reporting by the complainant/informant: No Delay Particulars of properties stolen/ involved attach separate sheet if necessary: Ss. Property Property / Description | Est. Value te No. Category | Type InRs. Total value of property (In Rs.) Inquest Report/U.D. Case No. if any: FIR Contents(attach separate sheet, if required):26 To, The SHO, P.S.Palam Village, New Delhi, Address. No. RZF-63, Street No. 3, Mahavir Enclave, New Delhi- 10045, Contact No. 8384075192. Application for registration of case against Ashish Thakur @ Ashish Thakur, son of Bodh Raj, resident of village, Gowallow, Tehsil Gandosh, District Doda, Jammu & Kashmir, Mobile No. 9622134714, for committing rape on the pretext of promise to. marry and to cheat with the innocent applicant. Sir, The applicant respectfully submits as under: 1, That Applicant is law abiding citizen and had never indulged any nefarious activities. That applicant who is doing her business at Bathinda is a single mother of two kids. That Ashish Thakur who is using mobile bearing no. 9622134714 used to send messages to applicant on regular basis since 10° August, 2019 on whatsapp number of applicant and applicant never used to reply the messages send by Ashish Thakur and even Ashish Thakur who is in habit of sending routine message to applicant just to start conversation with her. But applicant being a responsible person had never used to reply to any messages send by Ashish Thakur as applicant always intend not to involve herself in any fake relationship of love affair as she always wanted to settle her life after marrying aresponsible person and applicant also disclosed this fact to Ashish Thakur. This can be also be whatsapp numbers. The record of 29a7 Screenshots are also attached herewith for your kind consideration and perusal. Even applicant on very first audio and Video calls disclose to Ashish Thakur regarding verified from the chat conversation held between Ashish Thakur also talk to kids of applicant. The audio recording of the same are available with applicant. Ashish Thakur always insisted applicant to meet her in person but applicant always refused in genuine demand of Ashish Thakur. That applicant understands that it's a fake alarm given by Ashish Thakur just to cheat applicant and applicant did not responded the messages send by Ashish Thakur. 2. That again on 27" October, 2019 near Dwali. Ashish Thakur again started sending messages to applicant on one pretext or the another and also started giving video calls to applicant which applicant never used to pick and answer the same and Ashish Thakur always presurized applicant to attend his video calls to which applicant always refused and Ashish Thakur again tried to allure applicant while saying that he fell in love with applicant and he want to get married to applicant and here also Ashish Thakur disclose his fake name in the name of Akash Thakur. That applicant used to visit her native house at Haryana and at that time Ashish Thakur had given video calls and whatsapp calls and other routine ordinary calls to applicant and Ashish Thakur also talked to 3028 the sister, Bhabi and kids of applicant and again tried to convince all the family members of applicant tried to make Ashish Thakur understand that the family members of ashish Thakur will not accept her sister alongwith two children on which Ashish Thakur convince sister of applicant that he himself will handle this issue after convincing his family. After listening the love talks of Ashish Thakur, applicant started developing feel and emotions for Ashish Thakur, for which Ashish Thakur misuséd the emotions and feelings of applicant and Ashish Thakur also requested applicant that she should inform Ashish Thakur whenever she will visit her residence at Delhi, as he want to visit Delhi to Meet her. After this conversation Ashish Thakur started calling applicant day and night and tried to convince applicant that she should personally meet him to know him better on which applicant gone to Delhi on 27.01.2020 and informed Ashish Thakur regarding reaching Delhi on which Ashish Thakur arrived at Delhi at H.No.63, SoniSadan, Gali No.3, Mahavir Enclave, New Delhi Delhi-110045, the residence of applicant where Ashish Thakur again convince applicant that Ashish Thakur is. considering applicant as legally wedded wife and also started calling applicant not as Rajan Devi but as Rajan Thakur. At Delhi Ashish Thakur made physical relationship with applicant on the pretext of getting married with applicant at 31an the earliest. Ashish Thakur stayed with applicant at Delhi for two days (28/29 Jan. 2020) in her residence and continuously made physical relationship with applicant. That on 02.02.2020 again Ashish Thakur visited Delhi in her residence and again made physical relationship with applicant on the pretext of marriage at the earliest. Applicant had not reason to suspect the intention of Ashish Thakur if she would have doubted the intention of Ashish Thakur that she would have never indulged with this emotional physical relationship on the pretext and assurance of marriage given by applicant. 3. That Ashish Thakur again asked applicant to again meet her on 05.02.2020 on which applicant complete refused Ashish Thakur for the purpose of physical relationship as applicant want some commitments of marriage from Ashish Thakur and had given 20 days time to ashish Thakur for the purpose of finalizing the marriage proposal with you family members and you also as your. | showed applicant that you will finalize the marriage proposal with your family members that during the span applicant came to know about the fact that name disclose by Ashish Thakur as Akash Thakur was a fake name disclosed by him as the actual name of Ashish Thakur was Akash Thakur. Ashish Thakur always. assured applicant that her both children as well as she is the sole responsibility of her anda Zo Ashish Thakur also told applicant that it was their family tradition to send children outside the city for their higher education and he will also send the children outside the city for the purpose of education after getting married with applicant. AshishThakur shown a castle of dreams to applicant for the purpose of indulging her into physical relationship. Ashish Thakur used to talk to applicants since morning 6 p.m. to till late night 2 to 3 30 A.M. every day even Ashish Thakur used to call and send messages to the family members of applicant also. 4. That on 16.03.2020, Ashish Thakur request applicant as Ashish Thakur is going to Gujarat for some urgent work so applicants should meet him at Delhi which applicant agreed and on 16.03.2020 Ashish Thakur met me at Delhi at her residence and formatted the mobile phone of applicant after talking the same on the Pretext of calling some person. That Ashish Thakur formatted the mobile of applicant with the ulterior motive to delete the entire data including photographs, message, chat done by Ashish Thakur from time to time with the applicant. 5. That after formatted the mobile of applicant the act and conduct of Ashish Thakur dramatically changed towards applicant as Ashish Thakur openly proclaimed that you allure applicant in love affair merely to indulge and misused her physically and emotionally as his ulterior motive was only to