A01 Marking Criteria Evidence it has been met What could be done to improve the project in this area? Clear identification of the topic to be investigated or researched Clear evidence of appropriate aims and objectives for the proposed project title. Detailed project plan Clear evidence of monitoring progress of project work against the agreed objectives. Mark Awarded: _/10© AQ1 Manage identify the topic (ec rtipee eee el foley footie -F-Woce le gel-l} Coo tichter esi] eects eee] Giger cesses) 7-10 marks 4-6 marks 1-3 marks O marks Clear identification of the topic to be investigated or researched and clear evidence of appropriate aims and objectives for the proposed project title. Detailed project plan, with clear evidence of monitoring progress of project work against the agreed objectives. ‘Some identification of the topic to be investigated or researched and some evidence of appropriate aims and objectives for the proposed project title. Project plan, with some evidence of monitoring progress of project work against the agreed objectives. Limited identification of the topic to be investigated or researched and imited evidence of appropriate aims and objectives for the proposed project title Brief project plan, with little evidence of monitoring progress of project work against the agreed objectives. No relevant response.“A02 Marking Criteria Evidence it has been met What could be done to improve the project in this area? Evidence of detailed research involving the selection of a wide range of relevant resources. Evaluation of resources. Critical analysis and application of the resources Clear links made to appropriate theories and concepts. | Mark Awarded: /10Te Noym ETM (FioJ] fal) 7-10 eee eo eld coy marks vaniety of resources analyse data Cre Aonu loceclg demonstrate understanding Ril oices ethan 4-6 marks 1-3 marks O marks Evidence of detailed research involving the selection and evaluation of a wide range of relevant resources, Critical analysis and application of the resources with clear links made to appropriate theories and concepts. Evidence of some research involving the selection and evaluation of a range of relevant resources ‘Some analysis and application of the research, with links made to appropriate theories and concepis. Evidence of limited research involving limited selection and evaluation of resources. Little or no analysis and application of the resources with few links made to appropnate theories and concepts. No relevant response.A03 Marking Criteria Evidence it has been met What could be done to improve the project in this area? Candidates take appropriate decisions ‘Appropriate data is collected and thoroughly | analysed The project plan is fully implemented and the ‘outcome is fully realised to a high standard and | consistent with a candidate's finally agreed plan | There is clear evidence of appropriate changes to, project plan or title or development of, the ini or aims and objectives, with clear and appropriate reasons for any changes. Candidates communicate their findings fluently in | an appropriate format, synthesising information from a variety of sources and present them within a logical and coherent structure which addresses closely the nature of the task. [Mark ‘Awarded: /20Assessment Obiectves | Markcband | eee et eaei 14-20 \Ouneicetos inh eppropriete deciione and lise sppropreti data in cotected and thorough ‘natyead. The project plon is fly implemented ea) 1nd the outoore i uly reakoed tow high © docison-maing starclard and consitert with a cance fly ee) ‘sqreed plan, Sere “There ie cisar evicenoe of apprapriste changes to, prey development of, the ital prejot plan cr tile Cr sre ard cbyectivos, with cleer and approrriate ‘raosans for any change. an ddaten communicate ther frdoge fused ‘en epproprinte format, myrthasiaing nformason from a varaty of sourose and prosert therm wathin ego and coherent meuctire which actleaen ooo the nature ofthe took, Condicatan tak doomone and come eppropnate data ie colactad ard acnquainy analyend. The rcjectploniaerparnonted and the outcome is ‘eficerty reained to en aconptabe standard and ‘conatact wth a cancSatn's fay arond plan “Therein worn evidence of approprite changes to, er development cf, tha ital project plan or 18o er ome and cbjectives, with reason for ary change. Candidates comrmunicata clearly tae Endings, showing nome aby to mrthesia information from diferent eourcos and presert thom in & structured manner sppcaprate fr the task. ‘Qancicaton taho tow daciione and ito data ‘a inmticintly enalyood. Tho prcjct plan implemented alerted wary and the outcome in rmateed n'a irited manner end ct aly ‘ccnwatent with a canciceta's finaly agreed plan “Thera i lita cr no micano of apereatn changes to, or dovslonmert cf, tho intial project plan or ite or sien and objpctivas, wih only leted rosecne for any charges, Candclaton corrmunicat their fringe by drawing on ated pure of nourona onc rseect them in a rarer Rot vaya appropriate for tha task No manant eaponee,A04 Marking Criteria Evidence it has been met What could be done to improve the project in this area? | Detailed and careful evaluation of the | strengths and weaknesses of the completed project in relation to the planning. Detailed and careful evaluation of the strengths and weaknesses of the completed project in relation to the implementation. Detailed and careful evaluation of the strengths and weaknesses of the completed project in relation to the outcomes. Detailed and careful evaluation of the strengths and weaknesses of the completed project in relation to the the candidate's own learning. Material is consistently relevant, well- structured and appropriately presented. Candidates clearly communicate their findings and conclusions which are based on sound evidence and judgement. | Mark Awarded: _/10ees