Facuury or Crvit Law (1734) REMEDIAL LAW 2019 GOLDEN NOTES FACULTY OF CIVIL LAW UNIVERSITY OF SANTO TOMAS MANILA‘The UST GOLDEN NOTES is the annual student-edited bar review material of the University of Santo Tomas, Faculty of Civil Law. Communications regarding the Notes should be addressed to the Academics Committee of the Team: Bar-Ops. Address: Academics Committee | UST Bar Operations Faculty of Civil Law University of Santo Tomas Espafia, Manila 1008 Tel.No: (02) 731-4027 (02) 406-1611 loc. 8578 Academics Committee Faculty of Civil Law University of Santo Tomas Espafia, Manila 1008 All rights reserved by the Academics Committee of the Faculty of Civil Law of the Pontifical and Royal University, (of Santo Tomas the Catholic University ofthe Philippines 2019 Edition, No portion ofthis material may be copied or reproduced. fn books, pamphlets, outlines or notes, whether printed, ‘mimeographed, typewritten, copied indifferent electronic devises or in any other form, for distribution or sale, without a written permission ‘A copy of this material without the corresponding code telther proceeds from an illegal source or isin possession ‘fone who has no authority to dispose the same. no. O74 Printed inthe Philippines, july 2019,ACADEMIC YEAR 2019-2020 CIVIL LAW STUDENT COUNCIL LyODYCHIEG.cAMARAO PRESIDENT [MARIA FRANCES FAVE R GUTIERREZ INTERNAL VICE PRESIDENT "KRYSTAL GAYLER DIGAY SECRETARY TEAM: BAR-OPS NICOLEMARIEA. CORTES cuainensow MARYLOU REWaIM, OLOTEO VICE-CHAIRPERSON (CHRISTINE JOYCE P. ANDRES ‘SECRETARY ‘KRIZA NIRA. MALALUAN ASST, SECRETARY ELOUISAANN DC. CARREON HEAD, PUBLIC RELATIONS OFFICER CLARIT. MENDOZA ASST. EAD, PUBLIC RELATIONS OFFICER. ELISHAELAINED. BAYOT. MEAD, FINANCE COMMITTEE JUSeriN GHACE wean HEAD, HOTELACCOMODATIONS COMMITTEE PATRICIAMAED.GUILLERMO ASST. HEAD, HOTEL ACCOMODATIONS COMMITTEE [RAFAEL EROMEM. MENDOZA [ASST HEAD, HOTEL ACCOMODATIONS COMMITTEE KINA MATHEA N.CANLAS ASST: HEAD, HOTEL ACCOMODATIONS, COMMITTEE [MARSHAN DEIN 5. CUALBERTO [ASST HEAD, HOTEL ACCOMODATIONS, COMDITTEE KIERJOHN V. UY {LoGISTiCs comMITTEE GLENN HATTHEW & MANLAPID Loaistics COMMITTEE ‘VAN ANGELO K RESPICIO LOGISTICS COMMITTEE TAMES ROSS L TAN Logistics comMITTEE {LOUELL JUDE. QUE Loistics comMrrTEE MON FRANCIS A. TOLENTINO ‘SENIOR MEMBER {CLARA LOUISSE , YUMANG. SENIOR MEMBER Jocunis DaNieL 2 cuaDes ‘SENIOR MEMBER JERRENIAH KRIZIAH B. BATALLER SENIOR MEMBER ATTY. AL-CONRAD 8, ESPALDONACADEMICS COMMITTEE "EDREA JEAN V. RAMIREZ SECRETARY GENERAL AYADOMINIQUES. CAPARAS ASST. SECRETARY GENERAL ARIANNA LAINE SARMIENTO TXECUTIVE COMMITTEE ‘BELLE COLLEEN T. DELEON EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE PAMELA NICOLES:MANALO EXECUTIVE COMMITTE RUTHEMIAE ,SANVICTORES EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE [LAURIE MARIE PERIANES LAYOUT ARTIST IARI. MENDOZA COVER DESIGN ARTIST REMEDIAL LAW COMMITTEE BION HENRIK A. Lo [REMEDIAL LAW COMMITTEE MEAD ROSEANNE JOY. GOMEZ ASST-HEAD, CIVIL PROCEDURE {EEANNE CLAIRE M. BOOL ASST-HEAD, CRIMINAL PROCEDURE [ANABELLEO. DABU. [ASST HEAD, EVIDENCE ALYANNA PAULA A VELOSO ASST. HEAD, SPECIAL PROCEEDINGS MEMBERS ‘CARLA JOEY c. ARROGANTE LISHA ELAINE D. BAVOT REGINA ANNELS. CRUZ LOVELY JOY. PastGaN MIGUELNOELASAN ANDRES MARIATRICIA ANNE SANDOVAL DMA JACIELL D-NHARA H. TORRES ATTY, KENNETH JAMES CARLO HI20N "ATE. KING JAMES CARLO HIZONFACULTY OF CIVIL LAW UNIVERSITY OF SANTO TOMAS ACADEMIC OFFICIALS ATTY. NILOT. DIVINA REV. FR. ISIDRO C, ABANO, 0.P. DEAN REGENT ATTY. ARTHUR B. CAPILT FACULTY SECRETARY ATTY, ELGIN MICHAEL C, PEREZ LEGAL COUNSEL UST CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTO CONCEPCION LEGAL AID CLINIC JUDGE PHILIP A. AGUINALDO WDB COORDINATOR LENY G. GADANIA, R.G.C. ‘GUIDANCE COUNSELOROUR DEEPEST APPRECIATION TO OUR MENTORS AND INSPIRATION Justice Roberto A, Abad Justice Ronald B. Moreno Justice Maria Cristina J. Cornejo) Judge Myra B, Quiambao Justice Magdangal De Leon Dean Lope E.Feble Justice Myra V. Fernandez Dean Carlos M. Ortega Justice Oscar C. Herrera Jr. Dean Willard B. Riano (+) Justice Amy L. Javier Atty. Gregorio Gerry F. Fernandez Justice Zenaida G. Laguilles ‘Atty. Benigno G. Par Jr. Justice Gabriel T. Robeniol Atty, Christian G.Villasis Judge Philip A. Aguinaldo Dean Ma. Soledad Mawis Judge Cesar D. Santamaria Sr. For being our guideposts in understanding the intricate sphere of Remedial Law. Academies Committee 2019TABLE OF CONTENTS ‘General Priniples A Concepts of Remedial Lave Substantive nw sev Remedial Law Rulemaking power ofthe Supreme Court 1 Limtavons onthe Rulemaking power of te Supreme Court 2 Power ofthe Supreme Courtto amend and suspend procedural rls 1. Naat of Philippine COUR voennnnnnnnenon 1 Meaning ofa cour nna 2. Courtas dsngushed fom judge 3. Glssietion of Philippine Cours {Cours of arigna appt rsicton naan é ‘ours of general and special jursieton Consututoal and sttitry courts (Coutts of tw aod eigen eee , Jursleton of ouptnn nen 1 Supreme Court 2 Courtof Appeals 3. Sondganbayan an 4 Regional Teal Gunton monomer = 5 5 nl AMY CUS ee ‘Metropolitan Til Courts Municipal Tal Cours in Clie, Municipal Tal Courts Municipal (rei el Court = a7 7. Shain Courts a os F_ussdetion over he pares ——Zs 1. tho jristction over the paints aequled - 19 2. How jediction over the defendants acquced.—————— 19 G. Juraton ver he subjet mati anne 20 1. Meaning oflursicton over the subject matter 20 2. Jurisicion versus the exercise of rset nna a 4. Erorofjunsiiion a distngulshed trom evra judgernt — an | oe jarition conferred and determined 21 5. Doctine of adherence of aidicion nan a Objections jurisdiction over the subjct mater. = 17. Biect of estoppel on objections a juridiston---eveeeromo— Hsien over ies nnemnnnnnnmornene Jusleton over theres or the propery i ign — 1rd over smal eis caer covered by the rules on Summary Procedure and Barangay (o0etON enn nnenesneerenecnrnene ne 2s ee 30 1L_Princip of ial ervey oa — 31 Doctrine af nominterferenee or dasa of adil stably nna cat iit Procedure 4, Meaning of ordinary citations. aa a 2. Menningotspectal cil action. aaa 3. Meaning eriminl ston. a 4 Gui tons versus Spec Precedings “NEILa5. Personal ations and el 2095 noone ae 3A 8. Localandtranstory aeons. = 4 Aetons a ein prsonal an quasi rem “3s. Independent Civil Aeon nannan-—— = (use of AetoR enn I Weaning fee ofScon 38 2. RigntatAcdon versus Cause of Aton “38 3. Fale tostaten enue of etiam 38 4 Testofthesuleteney of aeauseof action “0 5. Spltingasnge cause ofseton ant eects nn a 6 olnder nd misnde of cours of acihn-—sevsso=n enn es Parties to ii Ati nn — 1 Real Poti in intro ndaponsable partes: Representatives as parties Necessary Parle: Indigent Pates Alternative Delend8Ncnemernnem—ven need 2. Campulsory and permissive joiner of parteg nnn 4. Misjinder and non joiner Of APES nnn 2B ag8 U8 ————_—_ Salts agaist ents without iil parson. = 50 6 tect dent of party gant ———— st 4. istinction between Rel partys intrest ad oes Stan van 52 Venema ine nnn 53 1. Venue versus fusca 38 2. Venue of el atone 34 A. Venue of personal actions =~ 4 4A Venue of scons aint nonresidents ——s 5. When de Rules on venuedonotapply— a Bet of Stipulation on Venue ——— as, Rules on Pledge (neue Pleadings allowed in small chime cases and cases cover by te Rus fn Surmary Procedures 3? Nand of peadingennca---eeoom— a Complalttensse=—n Nogatve defenses nnn Negative pregnant somo ‘Mfimative defen Counterlims. 1. "Compulsory counter — 2. Pennissve counterion 4. econ the cousterdalm when the complaints assed Cross. 1 Thi fourth sc) prt compli renee & Reply. Peadngs lowed i sl claim cases and canes covered by the ues on summary procedure 62 Parts lean gs nnon nnn eee 2 Caption nnn = ononvnmne=nonn Resolution of Motionssecsm-mesees=mesrnersnn Remedies of plaintitwhen the complaint dismissed Remedies ofthe delendant when the motion denied. Elect of ismisal af compat on certain grounds \When grounds pleaded as affirmative defenses, 7. Barby SSS 8. istinguished form demurrer tocridence under Rul 33 Disniseaof setions 1. Dismissal upon notice bythe pin Two dss lenny 2 Dismisal upon motion by paint effect on existing counterclaim 5 bismisn eto he fal PA ne Preeee |. Dismisn of counters, costco tinpartynvsoo-—oen Prectval ieehieatomeiiatie a 1 Gonceptot Pre-Teens 2. Nature and purpose ——-veoemvnovnomnovnnnomoonnnnomnmn 5B. Notie of re-Ta-—nsveemevnevon=—ennno= mono 1 Appearance of parte fect of aur to appear. 5. Presral brie fect offallur to appear nna {5 Disneton between prestrain cl eas and prea im criminal case, ltteveilo ensvrser-rneennnsnenson=ennen 1 Requisites for interventio. none 2 Timete intervene 3._Remedy forthe deni of movin to ervene Saoma ————— Subpoena duces tc 1 Subpenaad testinaa =osnencenannann 4. Service of upon nnn | Compaling atendance of wines Contempt 5. Quashing of sUbpo0na nena nee = Move Diener 1. Deposition pending action: deposition befor action or pending ppeal-——— 2 Meaning of Soperon en nn nnn 1k Uses; Scope f examination When may objections to admsiity be mde {When may taking a apastion be terminated or Is Scope ited —— 2. Weitan interrogatories to adverse parison. 2. Consequences of eis taser an 1h fet offlureto serve writen nterapaorcs. 3. Requestor Admission — 2. Impl admission by averse pay —— et ofadmisson &_ffetoffalurto fe and serve request or amision.— 4. Production or ispection of documents Osean nana Pigecal and renal examination of perso. 6 Consequences of refisa to comply with modes of dscoveryXK. Tethennnnnn — 9 1. Adjourns ad postponement ian 21. ‘Requstes of motion to poetpone tal 10 a. Forabrence fevidences “a 1. Poriiness of pay or count Order of ea reversal fore n= —— (Consolation or Severance of hearin fal nen Delegation of ecopton of eden nan “ial by Commision nnn 2a, Reference by consent or ordered a eth non 1 Powers othe commission nnn = © Commisione's report notice to paris andhearing onthe report 1% Demurrer evident ern nnnnce sl aha 1" Ground, 2. Bfectof denial. Bet of grant 4 Wavvrat right preset evidence - Demurrer ta evidence ina cvilcase versus damurrerto evidence ina cminal toes 127 1 Judgrents an Fa ores a = vena 1? 1 Judgment without il 2. Contents of jadement 4, Memorandum Deion 3. Jadpment onthe pleating n neon Tia mr 125 4. Summary odgments nono — a Forthechimant ~~ —— 1b Forthe efendae: = cam When the case not ily sdjudiated, 5. Judgmant an the pleadings versus summary jogments 6 Rendition of judgment and final orders. a Entyof judgment and final order. [AK Postjudgment remedies [BR Motion fr new trial of reconsderationsroo=-—mnwnnsemmonon 2 GA 2. Whentofien 2 aaa 3 Denialafthe motion fe ————— 4 Grantofthermtion: effet n= nnn 5. Remedy when mations denied: ech 15-day evade 0. An ——— 1" Idgment an nal orders subject appa mvomm 2 Matters not appesable enna 5 Remedy against judgment and ones which are no appealale 2 Final judgment le; Btceptons see 4 Modes sppea : = — 2. Ordinary appeal 1 Petton forreiew ne Petition fr review on Crtorat omnes Tasues toe rate on appeal Period of pp. —— = Perfection af appeal Partcpaton ofthe Salictor General during appl ‘Appeal rom judgments ial orders of te MTC ‘Appeal or judgments mal orders ofthe RTC. ‘Appeal rom dementia orders of te CAs12 Review ofina judgments o nal orders ofthe COA. 1 Review ofa gments or fal orders fhe COMELEC nner 4 1 Review aia jadgmentsor nal order of he (SCowan nnn 4 15. Reviewofial dpm al orders ofthe Ombudsman nanan 4 16 Review of ia judgments or inal orders of quad genes none —165 | 17, Dismscl Reinstatement and Withdrawal of Appeal ai 18. Dual Function of Appin Courts nnn —<——ss 19. The "Wormies ror Rae" in Appellate Dedsons.. nT _DD Rel rm jadgments onal ordesand resoitions nnn AD 1 Grounds for avatingthe remedy —— ini orporate.parmership, or sssodation felons, "bebween std among Soler, members, of assoats and becween, any" or all-of thom and the forporition, partnership of assoiaton of lich they ae stokbolders, members, oF Ssocates eepctive Sppautmentofaectors trates, aces fran erperatins prerhi However where the basic issue is something ther than the righ to recover sum of money, Sthete the money cai spray ince tea consequence of the principal rel sought lke specie performance suit abd in actions forsupporeorfor annulment ofa judgment or | 3 Incapable of pecuniary estimation, and. are ogrzable excusvely by the RTCs (Barangay Pipl Tali, GR Na. 138288, Sepeber 2, | 4 Derwvativesuts:and 2005) 5 tespeeson of corporate book (Rule 2, oyna 8799) Inra-corporatecontrneesies_that_ace wiht rsition atthe TE Peston for guardians, custody fof licen, habeas corpus ia 2 Patios for adoption of childron sand te revoaton Complaints for annulment and Secaron of rity of marcage nd property relations of spouses (those. ving together under Siero statue and afreements: nd petitons for disolubon of ‘onjpal arenership of eine 4 Peutions” "or" support and/or aeinowodgment Summary jal BD worscovvexwores 16 Where one or more ofthe acased Isare low 18 years o age but not Tess than years of age: 2, When one ormore ofthe vieinsisa| ior a he eof the commission | of the oflense (RA 8369, Act | absinthe Fai Cours): Cases against minors cognizable under the Dangerous Drugs At 35 4, Vllations of RA 7610 othe Speciat Protection of Children Agsnst Child Abate, Explain and Discrimination Act ae mended by (assaf domestic vslence againsJURISDICTION ‘under the Family Code of the] a Women ~ involving 30s of Pains fenderbased™ valence that 6 Patios for decaratin of status | Feu or likely to. result in ot children ae” abandoned Dhysl semtal er pychoogiat Gependent oF sepected children | harm or sufening to women: petions Tor voluntary —oc| and. other forms. of physieat Children, the suspension, vents “and “coercion which termination, of restoation of | vate a woman's personhood, | Datetal author and oter cases | Integrity and freedom of | ngrinable under PO 603, BO 56 | movement and (Series of 1906) and other elated |b. Chren ~ which incude the lawssand Eommisson of ail forms of 1% Patton forthe cnstintion ofthe | buss melee cruel, family home (rendered | explatation, violence and tunnecessary by. Are 382, Family | dserminaten and all other Code) See 5 RA 8369), Eenaltons prejudicial to their development Se. RA 239) rT Bedusive Orginal [1 Accons uvolng personal 1. Al offenses punishable wit property where the vale ofthe | imprisonment. not exceeding 6 Property does not exceed Pap | years respective ofthe amount 500.000 of Metro Manila Php | Of fine and reyarles of er ‘0.000, Inposable accessory or other 2 etn fordaim of money where | penalties: the demand docs not exceed Pap | 2. In olfenses invaving damage to 500000 or, ir Metro Mania Pho] property though crimleal Probate proceedings, teste or | fine des not ecoed Php 10000 Intestate, where the value of de | (See.2, 8 129 as amended by RA fetate door nat exceed Php | 769 500.000 or, in Metro Wala Php | 3. Where the only penalty provided ‘00.000 bylaw ia ie ot exuding Php 1000 Admin Cirelor No. 0998, NOTE: tn the foregoing, atin] June 14.1904); rust be eaclusive of Tnerst | 4, ‘Those covered by the Rules on damages, attorneys fees, | Summary Procedure, te ligation expense, and cost (See 45 BP 129 05 amended by RA | a. Violations of ral laws 769). rules and vgulations 1, Mitaonsof herent awe 4 Aevons valuing tite w or| Violations of muna or ty possession of eal propery or ay srnances Foret thersin where the value |, Wiladons of BP 22 (AM. a, for amount does not exceed Php 0011-0150}and 20,000 or, in Net Mania Php | «All other eviminal_ cases 50000 "exclusive of inerest Wheres the penaly is damages atoreys tes, Inprigonment not exceeding Tngaton expense, and cost ‘ont nda fine of Pp (2008 Ba} 1.00 respective of other S. Martine elaine where the penaes oF el ablites Amand or alm doesnt exceed ring theron Pg 10,000 (So BP 129 ar |S. Al fences come by public Uvavensiry or Santo Tomas gy v Pacuery or civ LaveREMEDIAL LAW mended by BA 7E91) ‘fice and employes eation 6 Incision or exlsion of votes] to ther affien including (Sec 138,ar a8 fevernmentowned’ or = 7. ‘Those covered by the Rules on | tanta corporations, and by Summary Procedure: private inavidal charged 3 co 8 Force” entry and unlawtul| principal, accomplices or deaiet Scessoris, punishable with 9, Those covered by the Ruler on | imprisonment not more than 6 Small Cains, (e actos for] years or where one ofthe payment of money where the| secured holds pestuon essed flsim does not excerd Two] as Grade 27 and higher (Se 4 Hundred" Thousand. Pesos| PD, 1506, es amended by RA (20700000) excusve "of | 248), Interest and costs (48 No. 08. 7SGas amended, effective Pebriny 1.2016), NOTE: On uty 10,2018, Ant No (66-7-Sc as amended by the sc to Increase the amount of small lains trom P200,000.00 t 730000000 (AN No 0.8.75, os emended, fictive August 1 208 Dekigatet Cadastal oF Tani ragsation see covering lots where 1. There is -no_ controversy or opposition: 2. Contested but the value does nat treed Pp T0000 (Sees HF 128 esamended by RA 769) NOTE: The vale sal be ascertained by the affdguit of the daumant or agreement of the respetve claimants (Sec, BP. 129) omended by BA 751 Special Peto for habeas corpar ia the | Application Yr all the absence of hsence of all RTC judges in the | all RTC judges ia the province oc. province ory (Sex. 35 8 129) WRT Gases lavelving eaforement oF ‘ations of environmental and other Fetated Tavs, rules and repulations (Sec, Rule 1, AN. 09.6-8SC) @ Ueyeagametes 2019 Goren Nores 10JURISDICTION Tetley sovoetcactan | (Sore) Sten St a citeintetathosecsaogme | [ony | brant mms te fect cenens Soom es ee ng ile ‘(SUNWURISDICTION OVER THEPARTIESS 2 Ae tates | | [Reged wher the By mi ny seen a] | LSE ST af | bmn ese re | eid or | ore ‘cancellation or correction of Oe itis ‘Registries mentioned in Title | =< —_ ‘VI, Book Two of the Code of | —— == enn |e vemaring etpaes me bate | | L—— larry, 200 Se Ltatpecene| | at aera wie and| | Erpnacon 32 Pl 970 HL) Pacuury oF civittawREMEDIAL LAW Tei equivalent to service of summons (Se 20, fate) ‘An appearance in whatever form, without ‘xplty objecting tthe Jurisition ofthe ‘ours over the perch, ta submision to the Jivediction of we courtover the person. may be ma by simpy ing » formal motion, pies or answer i his mation fr any other purpose thant objet othe jurisdiction othe our over his person, he thereby submits himselr to the" ursdiction ofthe court (Busueg Ch No 1695, June 30,1987 Le ‘Naval rag Corp v C4 GR No 103200 gust 31,1994). ‘XPM Spal Appnearance Wien che defendant's appearance is made precisely to objec to the furedition of the Cour over his person, lt cant be considered {5 appearance tn court (Froch Of Mil Machinery Ine CGH Na 126872 September m,1355) NOTE: Special appearance operated as an faception’ to the general rule on voluntary appearance. cordingly, objections 10. the Figen ofthe court over the person of te Asfendane most be explicty made, Le, set fonsitues. voluntary submission to. the Fereictin of the eoure (Rap iy Rely and Development: Corp Vile cea, Gi Na 108197, Februcry 1, 2010) snstances of Special Appearance 1. Special appearance in court challenging he inrnaction of the cxure oa the around of teva service of suamans (Gov. Corder, Gi No. 164705, ay 4 2010) 2 Objections to jusdction over the person of the defendancy ing ether motion to dismiss for in the answer ae an lfirmtive defense (franca! Realy’ Sip, GR Ma 15460, September 82005) ‘Bling_of_pleadings_seeking_alfirmative ‘efSconstiutes voluntary appearance GR: Seeking afrmatve ree onsututesvolumary appearance, andthe oneequent sisson of ones person to the Ferisdcton ofthe court XPNs: Inthe case of pesings whose prayer is precsely Tor the avldance ofthe juslcton @ wwe 20 of the cour, whlch only leads to aspeial pearance, These pleadings re 1 In cil oes, motion to dismiss on the sound of lace of Jurisdiction over the Deron of the defendant whether oF not ‘ther ground for iamistal are include 2. neriina! etsy motions to. ash a ompsine on the round of ck. of Furst over the person ofthe accused: 3. Motion o quash awarantofarrest The fist 2 are consequences ofthe fct that Tare wo fe them would consttutea waver of the defense of lack of jrslcton over the prsonthe 3 isa consequence cf the at hat Fes the very legality of the court process Toreing the submission of the person of the accused that isthe vey issue ina motion t Gath a warant of srest (Miran Tle, eo 150763, March 1, 2000), JURISOTEHTONOVERLERESUBIECT oT Rianne Ieis the power to near and determine eases of the general las to which dhe proceedings Io ‘uesion belong teerera, 2007 Ge Jurscton ovr the subject mater cannot tbe waived, enlarged or mised by ‘Sulton ofthe partis (Repub spol, 336S0RA 353) [XPN:Extoppel by lochs by fare to objet the ursdicton ofthe court for along peta of tse and by tavoking IS jrsdeton In fivaining atiematve celle (Tjom Sbonghoney, Git na 21450, Apri, 1968) Jristction_over_the_sublect_matier_xs, huis verte person oe ers negured by the ing ff he pesidon incase the plinit oby tees (le 123) by valid rer of oluntary submission ute incase. of (GR: Determined by the allegations ofthe complaint (ena, oon, XPM: Where the reat issue are evident hen bject materfepend on how the pares word ot (erera 2007), e9 8 which the defendant verre the defense of the essence of tween the partes mh [eannat be made wo] JURISDICTION ‘Contered by Taw which may be ether the Constitution or 8 to depend, intrectly test om he partys lon ror Tes the aumoriy 0 hear and decide ses. Teds. dapend "pon the reply of the ecercse of that power or on the Stetson mace Lin ct any hon Felipe etree | September, 1994) AMI ‘One where he court, offeer or guise trio or in excess sheen, or with ‘hsereton TEAS any act of the fourt "pursuant to Such authori. whlch econ. there i hurisdcvon over the Sal ther questions fing inthe ease but sn xerise of Hurston (lerera Bove, 25 "Ph 245; Pala», Q4S, ines GH Na. 120366, | ay 15,1966, oT LI One tat the cour may commit inthe furedcvon: Incas orrors of proce oe mistakes in the oid or at least oiable (Se 10) & () Rae 16 Rate 65, 2 "The oaly wrepton when the party Frsing the iste ‘barred by sappe “Their an evercise ot | The cour aed With | joristcton "inthe | jrtsdccon ut absence (of commited procedural Jursiction. fore inthe An errorof justin | fats oF tela fs'one where the act Compsined of ras | An eror in jadgment without or im exces | may commit ia the Dtjrsbieton or with | eerese fs rave abuse | joridetion (i. fseretion, which ts tantamount olck or Fedcson snd which ony bythe trtraodinry wri of ferrart (rst Corporation v. Former ‘Suth Dinon of The Gout of Apply, ce No 171968 July 4, TS au emnonra in Te is conferred by tne, that is BP 129, ‘otherwise owe 35 Judy Reorganization ‘Rett des not depend onthe objection or the {cs or omissions of ths parle or anyone of ‘hem (public. Sanglong, 159 SCRA 515 PNB. Floren, 206 SCRA S82), Instances_hen_hissiction_overthe sublectmattercannothe conferred 2 By voluntary act oF agreement of the pas 3. A eauees uniateral assumption of Justin: 4 Anerroneos ble tho court thatit has junction 5. By the partes through a stipuatoneg 6 The aproment of the partes acquired hough or waived enlarged or “imine By, any st or omision of the pares:oFREMEDIAL LAW 7. Parties sence, acquiescence, consent oF ‘waver (ion, 2043) ‘Determination of Jursfiction over the sublectmatter [eit determined by the allgstions of the complain (Balazarv. Ombudsman, 510 SCRA 74) rgaraer of whether or nt tepals Cuided te, hi clan asserted thereln [octane Goetana, 469 SCRA 328). ‘Docttine of Primary Juriseion ‘Me dotrne af primary arson hols that Ira ene such that ts termination regres the expertise, specialized training and leowledge of che proper administrative Dodis, re must fst be obtained to an séminstratve proceeding before a remy i fupplied bythe courts even I the matter may ‘well eit hee proper urd, “The abortive eto guidencourtin determining Grete shoul rsfrin From exerting gene has determined some question or some Aspect of some question arising In the proceeding before the eure (rowne of Akan WeJody King Construction and Development Noe 197882 820262, Moverber27 2015 cng Fabiew C4 497 Pc), NOTE: The doctrine of primary Jurisdiction prchudes the. courer from raring a Fontovery "over which jredcton bas Inkl been lodged with an administrative boty of spec competence. For Instance In 2geran reform eases, ursdction is west in the Department of Agrarian Reform more Speciely. in the Department of Agranan Reform Adjudetion Board (DARAB) (Spouses Pajorda “Flores Gi Ne. 16789), January 15, 2a: Doctrine o Ancillayurisiction Ie involves the inherent or implied powers of the core to determine eer Inde t te sees ofits primary justin. NOTE: Under its aneilary jurisiction, a court may determine all questions reauve to te tates brought before i regulte the manner Inveich a trl sal be conducted, determine the hour a hich the tess and noes tay” be. hear ond. rant an injuncton tachment or gamshment Univensity oF Santo Tomas 2019 Goroen Nores 22 ‘Docisine_of Exhaustion of Administrative ‘Remedies 1k states mat cecourse trough court action faonot prosper ant aera such Mimintrative remedes have. frst boon fluted The onobsrvance ofthe doctrine ‘exhaustion of administrative remedies Fests in ack of cause of ion (Nation! Eeceaon dminitraion ilanseva, G2 No. t64203, March 9, 2010). NOTE: The mle on exhaustion of Mininstrative femedee” and doctrine of primary jursdcton apples only arent minrative agency exersee quan jul fr adjaeaory functon "(Asolte Communications ond Wiese Serer Dumatan, GX Ne 135762, Novemberz, 2002) RATIONALE: The thst of the mle fe tat ours must all admiisradive agencies fay ovt thse fonctions and discharge thee Fesponsbies within the spectlaed areas of their respective competene (Cabal Pere ‘Shon, Ga. 131758, arch 23, 2004 Te ral ese expenses and provides for the Speeder resluton of controversies. Comity nd convenience also impel cours sic Shy away fom a dispute unt he system of (Unverst Robina Corportion w Laguna ake ‘Authority Cf Na 191427, May 30,2011). De Girman was formally charged and found guilty bythe PPC for dishonesty and fondact grossly prejudicial to the. best Interest of service thereby ‘causing. bis ‘imigat from reric. However, this was fot implemented unl after 5) years Because of this, De Guzman fled a motion for reconsideration, claiming. that. the flecision hasbeen dartaat and that may fot be revived.withowt fing. another ‘harge: This was denied. De Guzman Bled his second) motion for reconsideration, which was resolved in his favor to have 8 Formal easing on the case. Aer due bearing, he was kewise found guilty ofthe harges and’ consequently smissed fom ‘he serviee. Undaunted, De Guzman filed his ‘hire motion for reconsideration whieh was fansidered as an appeal tothe PPC Board of Directors: However, before the isance of the Resolution, De Guzman elevated his fase tothe Avia a special iil action for ertoreri nd mandamus, Ia addition, De ‘Guzman also appested before the CSC whenJURISDICTION the PPC Board Reoution dented his appeal Iselevation ofthe eget the CAcorect? {dnnistative emedies thatthe courts must alow the administrative agencies to carry cut their fanctions and discharge thor Fesponsbltes within the specialized area of their respective competence. Is presumed that an adminisratve agency, if forded an Spportinty to pas pons mater wil decile Feasons of aw, comity and convenience prevent the cours fom entertaing eases Proper for determination hy sdmnistative yeices Hence, premature resort tothe cours necessarily becomes fata to the cause of con tf the petitioner PPC claims that De Guzman fled tp sueribe to the rule on exbauction of Siminsratve remedies since he opted te premature corral case. belore the CA Insts of Hing an appeal with te PPC Board, frat an appeal ta the CS, which are adequate fmedies under the Taw. (Philpine Postal Corporation Court of Appeal and DeGuzman, GR Na. 173500, December 8, 2013, Prt: Bomate.J) ‘Exceptions tothe ctrine af Exhaustion af ‘Admfisteatie Remestes 1. When respondent fil acted ia ater disregard of due process 2, Whom the questions involved are purely inal or og 8, Whon the eoneroverted oct ie potty Juridetion ort escete of uediction, 44 When there i estoppel on the part o the administrative agency concern 5. Whom ts appliestion may cause peat and lereparable damage 6 When the respondent 3. Department Secretary, whose sete asa alter go ofthe DPrerident bears the implied or assumed Spproval ofthe Tater unless actly Simpproved by hime 2, When ta require administrative remedies ‘vould be unsseonabie a. When the Tasstence in ts observance ‘would result in the nuliieaton of the 9, Whom the subect mater 3 private and inand ease proceedings: 10, Wen dows not prove pa, speedy and adequate remedy 2a 3 16. Where there are circumstances indieating ‘the urgency fjudial intervention (Paar (HGR No 122107 January 101997) Exhaustion of administrative. remedies may ako be consiered waved there 3 fle to sssert it for an unzeasonble Tenth of time (Rep Sondiganboyon, Gi Nas 11270605, Moreh 23,1995) ‘cll acto for damages may, however, Proceed notwthstanding the pendency of 4p administrative acon (Bere CA, ie Na 340s Febrary 6 199); ‘When teclaim involved s smal ‘When rong pu intrest is tnvlved; In que worranco proceedings (Caso v. Gora, GR No. 132174 August 20,2001) ‘fet of fallure to-exhaust administration somedlies “The ground should not be ack of jeden tt ck of cause of action ab renders the ction premature (Cara baring GR. Ma. 120708 March 3 1997; Pestanas .Dyag 81 sta 574) GR: Jurisdiction once attached, cannot_be busted by subsequent happen hithowgh of 3 etaracer which would have prevetedjarsdletin trom ataching in he Fistnstance and the court retains unsdeion ‘inte fn depose of te aca. rae, YC GH Na 112195, arch 13,1996) Where a subsequent statute expressly Dprohiks the continuad xeretee of ‘Where te law penalaing an act whieh i pnshable i repeated. By 2 subsequent ‘When accused Is deprived of his constitanal right such a5 where the four fas to provide counsel for the Secs who ls unable to obtain one and foes not intligentiy” waive his ‘onsalona igh Constr cathe ee that is ntendod 0 Speen acne Finger te veeeycuury or eric Law