The Supreme Court case United States v. Morrison centered around whether the Violence Against Women Act of 1994 was constitutional. It arose from Christy Brzonkala being raped by two Virginia Tech football players. After mixed results in lower courts, Brzonkala sued under the VAWA but the case was dismissed as unconstitutional. The Supreme Court ultimately ruled 5-4 that Congress lacked authority under the Commerce Clause or 14th Amendment to provide a remedy, and that only states could punish such violence. This questioned the balance of power between federal and state governments.
The Supreme Court case United States v. Morrison centered around whether the Violence Against Women Act of 1994 was constitutional. It arose from Christy Brzonkala being raped by two Virginia Tech football players. After mixed results in lower courts, Brzonkala sued under the VAWA but the case was dismissed as unconstitutional. The Supreme Court ultimately ruled 5-4 that Congress lacked authority under the Commerce Clause or 14th Amendment to provide a remedy, and that only states could punish such violence. This questioned the balance of power between federal and state governments.
The Supreme Court case United States v. Morrison centered around whether the Violence Against Women Act of 1994 was constitutional. It arose from Christy Brzonkala being raped by two Virginia Tech football players. After mixed results in lower courts, Brzonkala sued under the VAWA but the case was dismissed as unconstitutional. The Supreme Court ultimately ruled 5-4 that Congress lacked authority under the Commerce Clause or 14th Amendment to provide a remedy, and that only states could punish such violence. This questioned the balance of power between federal and state governments.
whether or not the Violence Against Women Act of 1994 was deemed unconstitutional. This issue arose when in 1994, a young woman named Christy Brzonkala was forcefully raped at Virginia Tech by two young men named Antonio Morrison and James Crawford, both of whom were football players. After an initial court hearing, it was found that Morrison is guilty, but Crawford was not. In a second hearing Morrison was again found guilty, but through Virginia Tech’s administrative team they were able to release Morrison due to “excessive” punishment. As a result, Brzonkala dropped out of the University and sued Morrison, Crawford, and Virginia Tech for violating the Violence Against Women Act that provides remedy for gender violence. However, both Crawford and Morrison dismissed the case as being unconstitutional, and thus led to the Supreme Court decision. Ultimately, it was decided that Congress had no power to execute section 13981 of the Commerce Clause, nor the fourteenth amendment because there was no action that affected interstate commerce. This conclusion was reached by a ruling of 5/4. Congress, or The United States, has no power to issue a remedy, only Virginia may process a punishment. Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist led the majority opinion that a statute cannot be mandated that the Interstate Commerce did not redress harm caused by the state. Despite this ruling, Justice David H. Souter noted that there was a “mountain of data assembled by Congress” that portrays the effect of violence against women that affects the interstate commerce. This Supreme Court case is one of federalism. It questions the relationship between the powers of local governments and national governments, and what the United States can oversee. The idea of federalism is violated after the National government passed the Violence Against Women Act because it transgressed the power that Congress holds under the Commerce Clause and the 14th Amendment. "United States v. Morrison." Oyez, www.oyez.org/cases/1999/99-5. Accessed 19 Jan. 2021.
“Violence Against Women Act.” NNEDV, nnedv.org/content/violence-against-women-act/.