You are on page 1of 10

Journal of Neurotrauma

39:1339–1348 (October 2022)


Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.
DOI: 10.1089/neu.2022.0083

Open camera or QR reader and


scan code to access this article
and other resources online.

ORIGINAL ARTICLE FLUID BIOMARKERS

Effect of Player Position on Serum Biomarkers


during Participation in a Season of Collegiate Football
Linda Papa,1,2,* Alexa E. Walter,3 James R. Wilkes,4 Hunter S. Clonts,1 Brian Johnson,5 and Semyon M. Slobounov4

Abstract
This prospective cohort study examined the relationship between a panel of four serum proteomic bio-
markers (glial fibrillary acidic protein [GFAP], ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase-L1 [UCH-L1], total Tau, and neu-
rofilament light chain polypeptide [NF-L]) in 52 players from two different cohorts of male collegiate
student football athletes from two different competitive seasons of Division I National Collegiate Athletic
Association Football Bowl Subdivision. This study evaluated changes in biomarker concentrations (as indi-
cators of brain injury) over the course of the playing season (pre- and post-season) and also assessed bio-
marker concentrations by player position using two different published classification systems. Player
positions were divided into: 1) speed (quarterbacks, running backs, halfbacks, fullbacks, wide receivers,
tight ends, defensive backs, safety, and linebackers) versus non-speed (offensive and defensive linemen),
and 2) ‘‘Profile 1’’ (low frequency/high strain magnitudes positions including quarterbacks, wide receivers,
and defensive backs), ‘‘Profile 2’’ (mid-range impact frequency and strain positions including linebackers,
running backs, and tight ends), and ‘‘Profile 3’’ (high frequency/low strains positions including defensive
and offensive linemen). There were significant increases in GFAP 39.3 to 45.6 pg/mL and NF-L 3.5 to
5.4 pg/mL over the course of the season ( p < 0.001) despite only five players being diagnosed with concus-
sion. UCH-L1 decreased significantly, and Tau was not significantly different. In both the pre- and post-
season blood samples Tau and NF-L concentrations were significantly higher in speed versus non-speed
positions. Concentrations of GFAP, Tau, and NF-L increased incrementally from ‘‘Profile 3,’’ to ‘‘Profile 2’’
to ‘‘Profile 1’’ in the post-season. UCH-L1 did not. GFAP increased (by Profiles 3, 2, 1) from 42.4 to 49.6 to
78.2, respectively ( p = 0.051). Tau increased from 0.37 to 0.61 to 0.67, respectively ( p = 0.024). NF-L increased
from 3.5 to 4.9 to 8.2, respectively ( p < 0.001). Although GFAP and Tau showed similar patterns of elevations
by profile in the pre-season samples they were not statistically significant. Only NF-L showed significant dif-
ferences between profiles 2.7 to 3.1 to 4.2 in the pre-season ( p = 0.042). GFAP, Tau, and NF-L concentrations
were significantly associated with different playing positions with the highest concentrations in speed and
‘‘Profile 1’’ positions and the lowest concentrations were in non-speed and ‘‘Profile 3’’ positions. Blood-based

1
Department of Emergency Medicine, Orlando Regional Medical Center, Orlando, Florida, USA.
2
Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
3
Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
4
Department of Kinesiology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA.
5
Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.

*Address correspondence to: Linda Papa, MDCM, MSc, Department of Emergency Medicine, Orlando Regional Medical Center, 86 West Underwood (S-200), Orlando, FL 32806,
USA E-mail: lpstat@aol.com

ª Linda Papa et al., 2022; Published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. This Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons License (CC-BY) (http://
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.

Correction added on February 16, 2023 after first online publication of September 29, 2022: The article reflects Open Access, with copyright transferring to the author(s),
and a Creative Commons License (CC-BY) added (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

1339
1340 PAPA ET AL.

biomarkers (GFAP, Tau, NF-L) provide an additional layer of injury quantification that could contribute to a
better understanding of the risks of playing different positions.
Keywords: athletes; biomarkers; concussion; football; GFAP; mild traumatic brain injury; neurofilament;
proteomics; sports; subconcussion; Tau; UCH-L1

Introduction nately low strain magnitude and included offensive and


Nearly 8 million students who currently participate in defensive lines.10 Tight ends had some overlap between
high school athletics and the more than 480,000 who Profiles 2 and 3. Overall, there is growing evidence sug-
compete as National Collegiate Athletic Association gesting differential vulnerability of football players to
(NCAA) athletes1 in the United States are at risk for con- head acceleration events a function of player position,
cussive and subconcussive injuries.2 Numerous studies but neural underpinning of this effect is poorly understood.
have documented that both clinically diagnosed concus- Like other blood tests used in medicine, a blood test
sive and repetitive subconcussive injuries induce similar for traumatic brain injury (TBI) has the potential to pro-
changes in brain structure and functions.3,4 The additive vide invaluable information about the severity or magni-
effect of subconcussive impacts has the potential for tude of injury to the brain. Glial fibrillary acidic protein
long-term deleterious effects on brain function and neu- (GFAP) is a protein found in astroglial skeleton of both
rodegeneration in select individuals.5-7 These concerns white and gray brain matter and has been used as a his-
are leading researchers to assess concussion risk and to tological marker for glial cells. Ubiquitin C-terminal
estimate contact exposure. hydrolase-L1 (UCH-L1) is protein in neurons that is
It appears that the location, frequency, and magnitude involved in the addition and removal of ubiquitin from
of head impacts in football differ by position, with spe- proteins that are destined for metabolism and has been
cific player positions at higher risk of concussion and used as a histological marker for neurons.12 Tau is an in-
long-term sequelae.7–11 In a study of the effects of play- tracellular, microtubule-associated protein that is enriched
ing position in former college and professional athletes, in axons and is involved with axonal microtubule assem-
white matter integrity, functional neural recruitment, bly and axoplasmic transport.13 Neurofilament light chain
and concussion history depended on career duration and polypeptide (NF-L) is principally found in axons and is
playing position.9 Recent studies have stratified players part of the neuron cytoskeleton that functions to pro-
into speed and non-speed positions, with speed players vide structural support.14 Previous studies have shown
building up momentum prior to tackling or being tackled, that these blood-based biomarkers of TBI are associated
and non-speed players engaging other players before sig- with sports-related concussion, subconcussive injuries,
nificant momentum can be generated. Therefore, speed and neurocognitive functioning.15–20
players encompass quarterback, running back, halfback, This prospective cohort study examined the relation-
fullback, wide receiver, tight end, defensive back, safety, ship between a panel of four serum proteomic biomarkers
and linebacker positions and non-speed players include (GFAP, UCH-L1, total Tau, and NF-L) in two different
all defensive and offensive linemen.11 cohorts of male collegiate student football athletes from
More recently, Karton and colleagues employed a two competitive seasons in a Division I NCAA Football
novel method for quantifying repetitive head impacts Bowl Subdivision. This study evaluated changes in bio-
using a biomechanical measurement method that incor- marker concentrations (as indicators of brain injury) over
porated frequency of impact, tissue strain magnitude the course of the playing season (pre- and post-season)
and time interval between impacts to measure exposures and also assessed biomarker concentrations by player posi-
specific to professional football player field positions.10 tion using two different stratification methods previously
They evaluated 3439 head impacts for eight player published by Karton and colleagues and by Lehman.10,11
positions during 32 regular seasons and divided player
positions into three profiles. ‘‘Profile 1’’ positions were Methods
exposed to low impact frequency of proportionately Study population
higher strain magnitudes within 25- to 30-min time inter- This prospective cohort study enrolled two different
vals and included quarterbacks, wide receivers, and cohorts of male collegiate student football athletes from
defensive backs. ‘‘Profile 2’’ consisted of all levels of the Pennsylvania State University from two distinct com-
magnitude of mid-range impact frequency and intervals petitive seasons in a Division I NCAA Football Bowl
(approximately 13 min) and included linebackers, run- Subdivision. This study was approved by the Pennsyl-
ning backs and tight ends. ‘‘Profile 3’’ positions experi- vania State University Institutional Review Board and
enced the highest frequency of head impacts within short informed consent was obtained from all participants
time intervals of (approximately 6 to 7 min) of predomi- prior to enrollment.
EFFECT PLAYER POSITION ON SERUM BIOMARKERS 1341

Study procedures clinical data. All samples were analyzed in duplicate.


All participants completed a comprehensive pre-season None of the intra-assay coefficients of variance exceeded
interview which included demographic information, 20%. Samples with concentrations below the level of
medical and concussion history (self-report), and his- detection were excluded from analysis, this included one
tory of learning disabilities. Pre-season blood draws pre-season UCH-L1 value and three post-season UCH-
were completed within 1 week before the athletic season L1 values. The average coefficient of variation of measure-
began (prior to any pre-season contact practices or com- ment of GFAP, UCH-L1, Tau and NF-L were 7.7%,
petitions) and the postseason blood draw within 1 week 10.2%, 6.3%, and 5.8%, respectively. Limit of detection
after the last game of the regular season. None of the of GFAP was 0.211 pg/mL, UCH-L1 was 1.05 pg/mL,
athletes were recovering from or were diagnosed with a Tau was 0.0146 pg/mL, and NF-L was 0.038 pg/mL.
concussion in the 9 months prior to the pre-season eval-
uation. A blood sample of 5 mL was placed in a serum Statistical analysis
separator tube and allowed to clot at room temperature Descriptive statistics with medians, proportions and inter-
before being centrifuged. The serum was placed in bar- quartile ranges were used to describe the data. For statis-
coded aliquot containers and stored at -70C until tical analysis, biomarker levels were treated as continuous
transport to a central laboratory where samples were data and measured in pg/mL. Data were assessed for
analyzed in batches. Lab personnel conducting the bio- equality of variance and distribution using the Shapiro-
marker analysis were blinded to the clinical data. All Wilk test. Logarithmic transformations were conducted
athletic trainers, physicians, and research personnel were on non-normally distributed data. Concentrations of all
blinded to the serum biomarker results. four biomarkers had to be transformed. Group compari-
sons were performed using the Fisher’s exact test, analy-
Outcome measures sis of variance, and independent sample t-tests with
The primary outcome measure was the change in bio- variance consideration. Correlational analysis used Pear-
marker concentrations over the course of a season. The son’s correlation and Spearman’s rank correlation. All
secondary outcome measure was the association between analyses were performed using the statistical software
protein biomarkers and playing positions using two dif- package SPSS 27.0 (IBM Corporation).
ferent published classification systems. Per Lehman and
colleagues, player positions were divided into either Results
speed versus non-speed positions or three profiles. There were 52 male collegiate student football athletes
Speed players included quarterbacks, running backs, half- included in the study. Mean age of the enrolled athletes
backs, fullbacks, wide receivers, tight ends, defensive was 21 years (with a range from 19 to 24) with a mean
backs, safety, and linebackers. Non-speed players inclu- height and weight of 75 inches and 265 pounds, respec-
ded all defensive and offensive linemen.11 tively (Table 1). The average number of years of foot-
Additionally, player positions were divided into three ball experience was 11 years, and 40% had previously
profiles recently developed by Karton and colleagues in experienced a concussion. There were 32 athletes in
a study that used a biomechanical measurement method non-speed positions and 20 athletes in speed positions.
that incorporated frequency of impact, tissue strain magni- There were no significant differences in baseline charac-
tude and time interval between impacts to measure expo- teristics between the two groups except in weight. Players
sures.10 In this study, ‘‘Profile 1’’ positions were exposed in the non-speed positions were significantly heavier
to low impact frequency of proportionately higher strain than players in the speed positions (291 vs. 224 lbs;
magnitudes (quarterbacks, wide receivers, and defensive p < 0.001; Table 1). Five total players were diagnosed
backs). ‘‘Profile 2’’ consisted of all levels of magnitude with a concussion (9.4%), two players from the first
of mid-range impact frequency and intervals (linebackers, cohort and three players in the second cohort (Table 1).
running backs and tight ends). ‘‘Profile 3’’ positions ex- There were no significant differences in concussion inci-
perienced the highest frequency of head impacts within dence in the speed (n = 2; 9.5%) and non-speed (n = 3;
short time intervals (offensive and defensive lines).10 9.4%) players ( p = 0.99) and no significant difference
in between ‘‘Profile 1’’ (n = 1; 17%), ‘‘Profile 2’’ (n = 1;
Biomarker analysis 7%) and ‘‘Profile 3’’ (n = 3; 9%; p = 0.78).
Serum samples were analyzed using the Simoa (single Collectively, there were significant increases in GFAP
molecule array) Neurology 4-plex assay kit (Quanterix, and NF-L serum concentrations over the course of the
Lexington, MA) for simultaneous measurement of season for all players under study (Table 2). GFAP
GFAP, UCH-L1, total Tau, and NF-L on the HDX Ana- increased from a median of 39.3 (interquartile range
lyzer. Assays were batched to minimize variability, with [IQR] 31.7-56.3) to 45.6 (IQR 35.2-63.3; p < 0.001).
each batch run with appropriate standards and controls Similarly, NF-L increased from 3.5 (IQR 3.0-4.6) to
to ensure reliability. The laboratory was blinded to the 5.4 (IQR 3.7-7.0; p < 0.001). UCH-L1 levels
1342 PAPA ET AL.

Table 1. Characteristics of Athletes Included in the Study in Speed and Non-Speed Positions

Non-speed positions Speed positions Total


n = 20 n = 32 N = 52
[95% CI] [95% CI] [95% CI] p Value

Age 21 [20-21] 21 [20-21] 21 [20-21] 0.570


Range 19-24 18-24 18-24
Height (inches) 76 [74-77] 74 [72-76] 75 [74-76] 0.099
Weight (lbs) 291 [282-300] 224 [213-235] 265 [254-278] <0.001
Years playing football 11 [10-13] 12 [10-13] 11 [10-12] 0.759
Previous concussions 13 (41%) 8 (40%) 21 (40%) 0.598
History of ADHD 8 (25%) 2 (10%) 10 (19%) 0.283
Player positions 14 (44%) 11 (55%) 25 (48%) 0.570
Offense 18 (56%) 9 (45%) 27 (52%)
Defense
Concussion during season 3 (9.4%) 2 (9.5%) 5 (9.4%) 0.999

ADHD, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder.

decreased significantly ( p = 0.047), and Tau levels were positions: n = 5 in ‘‘Profile 1,’’ n = 15 in ‘‘Profile 2,’’
not significantly different (Table 2). There were no signifi- and n = 32 in ‘‘Profile 3.’’10 In the post-season, concentra-
cant differences in post-season biomarker concentrations tions of GFAP, Tau, and NF-L increased incrementally
between players who were and were not diagnosed with from ‘‘Profile 3’’ to ‘‘Profile 2’’ to ‘‘Profile 1’’ (Fig. 2).
concussion during the season (Table 3). Similarly, concus- GFAP increased from 42.4 to 49.6 to 78.2 pg/mL, respec-
sions previously incurred before the current season did not tively ( p = 0.051). Tau increased from 0.37 to 0.61
correlate with concentrations of pre-season biomarkers. to 0.67 pg/mL, respectively (p = 0.024). NF-L increased
When biomarker concentrations were compared in from 3.5 to 4.9 to 8.2 pg/mL, respectively ( p < 0.001).
speed and non-speed position players,11 there were sig- Although GFAP and Tau showed similar patterns of
nificant differences in median levels of Tau and NF-L elevations by profile in the pre-season, they were not
between the two groups (Fig. 1). The differences were statistically significant. In the pre-season, GFAP con-
evident in both pre- and post-season serum samples. centrations changed from 37.7 to 37.2 to 61.4 pg/mL,
Median pre-season Tau concentrations were 0.63 (0.50- respectively ( p = 0.063) and Tau concentrations increa-
0.94) in non-speed players, compared with 0.91 (0.67- sed from 0.50 to 0.63 to 0.73 pg/mL, respectively
1.02) in speed players ( p = 0.032). Median post-season ( p = 0.093). Only NF-L serum concentrations showed
Tau concentrations were 0.53 (0.37-0.87) in non-speed statistically significant differences by profile, 2.7 to 3.1
players and 0.87 (0.62-1.07) in speed players ( p = 0.011). to 4.2 pg/mL, respectively, in the pre-season ( p = 0.042).
Similarly, median pre-season NF-L concentrations were Differences were not evident for UCH-L1.
3.4 (2.7-4.1) in non-speed players compared with 4.3 Changes in biomarker concentrations from pre- to
(3.3-5.1) in speed players (p = 0.033). Even more pronoun- post-season in speed versus non-speed players as well
ced differences were seen in post-season NF-L concen- as among the three different profiles are presented in
trations with speed players having significantly higher Table 4 and in Supplementary Figure S1 and Supplemen-
concentrations than non-speed players 6.7 (5.3-8.7) versus tary Figure S2. GFAP and NF-L demonstrated large
4.7 (3.5-5.7), respectively ( p = 0.004). GFAP concentra- increases in speed players Compared with non-speed
tions were also higher in speed versus non-speed position players over the season. GFAP increased 31% (speed)
players, but the differences were not statistically signifi-
cant. Differences were not evident for UCH-L1. Table 3. Comparison of Post-Season Biomarker
Concentrations between Players Who Were and Were Not
Using the profiles created by Karton and colleagues, Diagnosed with Concussion during the Season
players were divided into three profiles based on their
No concussion Concussion
during season during season
Table 2. Comparison of Biomarker Concentrations n = 47 n=5
Pre- and Post-Season median (IQR) median (IQR) p Value

Pre-season Post-season Post-season 43.8 (35.0-63.4) 47.4 (37.3-76.4) 0.687


n = 52 n = 52 GFAP (pg/mL)
median (IQR) median (IQR) p Value Post-season 4.8 (3.0-10.6) 4.7 (2.2-5.7) 0.417
UCH-L1 (pg/mL)
GFAP (pg/mL) 39.3 (31.7-56.3) 45.6 (35.2-63.3) < 0.001 Post-season 0.66 (0.47-0.97) 0.67 (0.54-1.29) 0.310
UCH-L1 (pg/mL) 6.9 (3.1-12.7) 5.0 (3.0-9.8) 0.047 Total Tau (pg/mL)
Total Tau (pg/mL) 0.82 (0.57-0.98) 0.67 (0.49-0.97) 0.105 Post-season 5.3 (3.6-6.9) 5.9 (5.6-9.0) 0.197
NF-L (pg/mL) 3.5 (3.0-4.6) 5.4 (3.7-7.0) < 0.001 NF-L (pg/mL)

GFAP, glial fibrillary acidic protein; UCH-L1, ubiquitin C-terminal GFAP, glial fibrillary acidic protein; UCH-L1, ubiquitin C-terminal
hydrolase-L1; NF-L, neurofilament light chain polypeptide. hydrolase-L1; NF-L, neurofilament light chain polypeptide.
EFFECT PLAYER POSITION ON SERUM BIOMARKERS 1343

versus 12% (non-speed) and NF-L increased 87% (speed) Chronic elevations of Tau tend to occur in severe TBI
versus 45% (non-speed). A similar pattern emerged for patients and UCH-L1 does not have a consistent pattern
the three profiles. GFAP increased 44% in ‘‘Profile 1’’ of elevation either by severity of injury or time.23
players, 27% in ‘‘Profile 2’’ players, and 12% in ‘‘Profile A novel aspect of this study was the evaluation of
3’’ players. The largest increases were seen in NF-L with the effects of player position on TBI biomarkers. We
rises of 165%, 62%, and 45% in Profiles 1 through 3, observed significant higher levels of Tau and NF-L in
respectively. UCH-L1 and Tau did not follow these pat- speed positions such as quarterbacks, running backs,
terns. These changes were not statistically significant. halfbacks, fullbacks, wide receivers, tight ends, defen-
sive backs, safeties, and linebackers, compared with non-
Discussion speed players like defensive and offensive linemen.
This is among the first studies, to our knowledge, to Speed players build considerable momentum prior to
assess the association between player position in foot- tackling or being tackled. In contrast non-speed players
ball and proteomic biomarker concentrations in the pre- usually engage other players soon after the football is
and post-season. This study evaluated a panel of four snapped, reducing momentum prior to contact. NF-L
proteomic biomarkers of brain injury (GFAP, UCH-L1, and Tau as measures of axonal injury are much higher
Tau, and NF-L) in two distinct cohorts of players in in those speed layers, perhaps indicating higher ‘‘shear’’
two competitive seasons of Division I NCAA Football. forces to axons. Axons, however, are not injured in isola-
Compared with pre-season, post-season levels of GFAP tion and injuries to the astroglia (GFAP) and neuronal
and NF-L1 increased significantly. Only five players bodies (UCH-L1) also occur.
were diagnosed with concussions during the two foot- This is consistent with the three-tier ‘‘brain strain
ball seasons and there were no significant differences exposure’’ profiles in which post-season GFAP, Tau,
in post-season biomarker concentrations between play- and NF-L concentrations were highest in ‘‘Profile 1’’
ers who were and were not diagnosed with concus- players (quarterbacks, wide receivers, and defensive
sions. Therefore, head impact exposures that did not backs) who had higher strain magnitudes impacts. Even
result in concussion were significant enough to raise though they occurred less frequently, the ‘‘higher strain
biomarker levels, suggesting cellular disruption from non- magnitude’’ impact players had the highest levels of
concussive impacts. GFAP, Tau and NF-L. Impact strain had more of an effect
In samples collected in the pre-season (prior to any on the biomarkers than the frequency of impacts and
contact practices), all four biomarkers were above known intervals between impacts.
baseline levels of uninjured control patients that have These incremental changes in biomarkers from highest
been analyzed on the same assay platform.21 Pre-season to lowest strain magnitude occurred not only after the
elevations in biomarkers have been observed in other season but were evident in player samples even before
studies in collegiate football players.15,22 Considering the season began. It was unexpected considering there
the players in our cohort had an average of 11 years play- had been no practices or football hitting activity. Pre-
ing experience and 41% had previously reported con- season GFAP, Tau, and NF-L demonstrated these simi-
cussions, pre-season biomarker elevations could suggest lar changes by player position profile but only NF-L
residual circulating biomarkers from prior concussive was statistically significant. This could be a function
and subconcussive impacts over their playing career. of the modest sample size or a function of the different
Subacute (weeks) and chronic (months to years) eleva- temporal profiles of each biomarker.23,25,26 For instance,
tions in GFAP and NF-L concentrations have been serum NF-L can remain elevated in mild TBI for up
found in patients following mild to moderate TBI com- to 5 years after injury compared with controls.23 This
pared with uninjured control patients with more variabil- supports our hypothesis that elevations in circulating
ity in the pattern of elevations with Tau and UCH-L1.23,24 biomarker concentrations prior to season onset could


FIG. 1. Boxplot comparing of median serum levels of four protein biomarkers [GFAP], ubiquitin C-terminal
hydrolase-L1 [UCH-L1], total Tau, and neurofilament light chain polypeptide [NF-L]) by player speed position.
Boxplots represent medians with interquartile ranges. (A) Pre-season serum GFAP concentrations in non-speed
vs speed positions; (B) Post-season serum GFAP concentrations in non-speed vs speed positions; (C) Pre-
season serum UCH-L1 concentrations in non-speed vs speed positions; (D) Post-season serum UCH-L1
concentrations in non-speed vs speed positions; (E) Pre-season serum Tau concentrations in non-speed vs
speed positions; (F) Post-season serum Tau concentrations in non-speed vs speed positions; (G) Pre-season
serum NF-L concentrations in non-speed vs speed positions; (H) Post-season serum NF-L concentrations in
non-speed vs speed positions.
1344
EFFECT PLAYER POSITION ON SERUM BIOMARKERS 1345

reflect prior cumulative head impact exposures includ- exertion, sleep and supplement use on biomarker levels.
ing players without prior history of concussions. Visible Moreover, we did not report neurocognitive data or imag-
signs or symptoms of neurological dysfunction may not ing data on the players and did not correlate biomarker
develop despite those impacts having the potential for levels with these measures.
neurological injury.3,6,27 This includes studies in children We used previously published categorizations of
aged 8 to 13 years who play football28 as well as those player position and did not report actual accelerometer
who play high school football.29 data from the players. Additionally, we have no infor-
Another important consideration is that there may be mation pertaining to helmet standardization, nor did we
differences in the mechanism of injury between player factor the type of helmet the players were using during
positions, including player’s helmet impact location.30 the study. Not all collegiate programs utilize the same
For instance, offensive and defensive lineman may brand of helmet, and it would be interesting to study the
have a greater proportion of impacts to the front of the elevation of biomarkers from sub-concussive impacts
helmet.7 Lowest strains consistently occur in impacts to between different helmet technologies.
the crown and forehead.30 Other players may have impact
locations that contribute to greater cervical strain. The Conclusion
cervical spine is particularly susceptible to injury because Serum concentrations of GFAP and NF-L increased
of axial loading forces to the head with the neck in flexion significantly over the course of the season despite few
or extension.31,32 players being diagnosed with concussion. Moreover, post-
These results support exploring these biomarkers as season GFAP, Tau, and NF-L concentrations were sig-
surrogates of subconcussive damage as they relate to nificantly associated with different playing position
magnitude, location, and frequency of head impacts. profiles based on magnitude, location, and frequency
Biomarkers provide an additional layer of injury quanti- of head impacts. The highest concentrations of post-
fication that could contribute to a better understanding season GFAP, Tau, and NF-L were in speed and
of the risks of playing different positions. Moreover, ‘‘Profile 1’’ positions (quarterbacks, wide receivers,
this type of biomarker-positional analysis could be used and defensive backs) and the lowest concentrations
to investigate game rule changes, player safety measures, of GFAP, Tau, and NF-L were in non-speed or ‘‘Pro-
on-field behavior, return-to-play decisions, and enhance- file 3’’ positions (defensive and offensive linemen).
ments to equipment.33 Blood-based biomarkers provide an additional layer
of injury quantification that could contribute to a
better understanding of the risks of playing different
Limitations positions.
While these data are encouraging, there are limitations to
this study. Athletes enrolled over two non-consecutive Funding Information
seasons represents a small sample of athletes. The play- This study was supported in part by Award Number
ers, however, are representative of many players in R01NS057676 (Papa, PI) from the National Institute of
this Division of the Football Bowl Subdivision of the Neurological Disorders and Stroke. The content is solely
NCAA. Only five players were diagnosed with concus- the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily
sion in the study population during the season. Addition- represent the official views of the National Institute of
ally, there were only five players in ‘‘Profile 1’’ positions. Neurological Disorders and Stroke or the National Insti-
Future studies should include a larger sample of players. tutes of Health. The funder had no role in the design and
Since non-speed players traditionally weigh more than conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis,
speed players, our study is limited by the lack of informa- and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or
tion on weight’s impact on the studied baseline biomark- approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the
ers in non-athletes. We also did not assess the impact of manuscript for publication.


FIG. 2. Boxplot comparing of median serum levels of four protein biomarkers [GFAP], ubiquitin C-terminal
hydrolase-L1 [UCH-L1], total Tau, and neurofilament light chain polypeptide [NF-L]) by player position profile.
Boxplots represent medians with interquartile ranges. (A) Pre-season serum GFAP concentrations in three distinct
player position profiles; (B) Post-season serum GFAP concentrations in three distinct player position profiles; (C)
Pre-season serum UCH-L1 concentrations in three distinct player position profiles; (D) Post-season serum UCH-L1
concentrations in three distinct player position profiles; (E) Pre-season serum Tau concentrations in three distinct
player position profiles; (F) Post-season serum Tau concentrations in three distinct player position profiles; (G) Pre-
season serum NF-L concentrations in three distinct player position profiles; (H) Post-season serum NF-L
concentrations in three distinct player position profiles.
1346
EFFECT PLAYER POSITION ON SERUM BIOMARKERS 1347

Table 4. Change in Biomarker Concentration (Mean and Percent Difference) over the Season by Player Position

Non-Speed Speed Profile 1 Profile 2 Profile 3


n = 32 n = 20 n=5 n = 15 n = 32
(95% CI) (95% CI) (95% CI) (95% CI) (95% CI)

GFAP
% Change 12% (5-19) 31% (2-60) 44% (-77-165) 27% (0.04-54) 12% (5-19)
Mean change (pg/mL) 5.1 (2.3-7.8) 13.1 (-1.7-27.9) 29.3 (-47.2-106) 7.8 (1.0-14.6) 5.1 (2.3-7.8)
UCH-L1
% Change 58% (-42-157) -3% (-43-37) 8% (-99-115) -7% (-56-42) 57% (-42-157)
Mean change (pg/mL) -1.6 (-3.7-0.5) -1.1 (-3.6-1.5) 0.7 (-6.6-8.1) -1.8 (-4.7-1.1) -1.6 (-3.7-0.5)
Total Tau
% Change -8% (-19-3) -1 (-14-12) 4% (-23-32) -3% (-20-13) -8% (-19-3)
Mean change (pg/mL) -0.09 (-0.16- -0.02) -0.01 (-0.13- 0.12) 0.05 (-0.24-0.34) -0.02 (-0.18-0.13) -0.09 (-0.16- -0.01)
NF-L
% Change 45% (25-65) 87% (26-149) 165% (-135-464) 62% (27-97) 45% (25-65)
Mean change (pg/mL) 1.3 (0.08-1.9) 3.3 (0.9-5.8) 6.8 (-5.1-18.6) 2.2 (1.0-3.4) 1.3 (0.8-1.9)

GFAP, glial fibrillary acidic protein; UCH-L1, ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase-L1; NF-L, neurofilament light chain polypeptide.

This study was supported in part by NCAA Grant concussion history, and playing position on white matter microstruc-
ture and functional neural recruitment in former college and profes-
#106031 ‘‘Effects of cumulative head acceleration events sional football athletes. Radiology 286, 967–977.
(HAE) over a single athletic season on brain functional 10. Karton, C., Blaine Hoshizaki, T., and Gilchrist, M.D. (2020). A novel repeti-
and structural integrity.’’ The content is solely the respon- tive head impact exposure measurement tool differentiates player
position in National Football League. Sci. Rep. 10, 1200.
sibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent 11. Lehman, E.J. (2013). Epidemiology of neurodegeneration in American-
the official views of the NCAA. The funder had no role style professional football players. Alzheimers Res. Ther. 5, 34.
12. Gong, B., and Leznik, E. (2007). The role of ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase
in the design and conduct of the study; collection, man- L1 in neurodegenerative disorders. Drug News Perspect. 20, 365–370.
agement, analysis, and interpretation of the data; prepara- 13. Teunissen, C.E., Dijkstra, C., and Polman, C. (2005). Biological markers in
tion, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision CSF and blood for axonal degeneration in multiple sclerosis. Lancet
Neurol. 4, 32–41.
to submit the manuscript for publication. 14. Liu, Q., Xie, F., Siedlak, S.L., Nunomura, A., Honda, K., Moreira, P.I., Zhua, X.,
Smith, M.A., and Perry, G. (2004). Neurofilament proteins in neurode-
Author Disclosure Statement generative diseases. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 61, 3057–3075.
No competing financial interests exist. 15. Papa, L., Slobounov, S.M., Breiter, H.C., Walter, A., Bream, T., Seidenberg,
P., Bailes, J.E., Bravo, S., Johnson, B., Kaufman, D., Molfese, D.L.,
Talavage, T.M., Zhu, D.C., Knollmann-Ritschel, B., and Bhomia, M.
Supplementary Material (2019). Elevations in microRNA biomarkers in serum are associated
Supplementary Figure S1 with measures of concussion, neurocognitive function, and subcon-
Supplementary Figure S2 cussive trauma over a single National Collegiate Athletic Association
Division I Season in collegiate football players. J. Neurotrauma 36,
References 1343–1351.
1. NCAA (2018). Estimated probability of competing in college athletics, in: 16. Papa, L., Zonfrillo, M.R., Welch, R.D., Lewis, L.M., Braga, C.F., Tan, C.N.,
NCAA Research. Ameli, N.J., Lopez, M.A., Haeussler, C.A., Mendez Giordano, D., Giordano,
2. Bailes, J.E., Petraglia, A.L., Omalu, B.I., Nauman, E., and Talavage, T. (2013). P.A., Ramirez, J., and Mittal, M.K. (2019). Evaluating glial and neuronal
Role of subconcussion in repetitive mild traumatic brain injury. blood biomarkers GFAP and UCH-L1 as gradients of brain injury in
J. Neurosurg. 119, 1235–1245. concussive, subconcussive and non-concussive trauma: a prospective
3. Slobounov, S.M., Walter, A., Breiter, H.C., Zhu, D.C., Bai, X., Bream, T., cohort study. BMJ Paediatr. Open 3, e000473.
Seidenberg, P., Mao, X., Johnson, B., and Talavage, T.M. (2017). The 17. Rubin, L.H., Tierney, R., Kawata, K., Wesley, L., Lee, J.H., Blennow, K.,
effect of repetitive subconcussive collisions on brain integrity in Zetterberg, H., and Langford, D. (2019). NFL blood levels are moderated
collegiate football players over a single football season: a multi-modal by subconcussive impacts in a cohort of college football players. Brain
neuroimaging study. Neuroimage Clin. 14, 708–718. Inj. 33, 456–462.
4. Reynolds, B.B., Stanton, A.N., Soldozy, S., Goodkin, H.P., Wintermark, M., 18. Oliver, J.M., Anzalone, A.J., Stone, J.D., Turner, S.M., Blueitt, D., Garrison,
and Druzgal, T.J. (2017). Investigating the effects of subconcussion J.C., Askow, A.T., Luedke, J.A., and Jagim, A.R. (2018). Fluctuations in
on functional connectivity using mass-univariate and multivariate blood biomarkers of head trauma in NCAA football athletes over the
approaches. Brain Imaging Behav. 12, 1332–1345. course of a season. J. Neurosurg. 1–8.
5. Gavett, B.E., Stern, R.A., and McKee, A.C. (2011). Chronic traumatic 19. Papa, L., Ramia, M.M., Edwards, D., Johnson, B.D., and Slobounov, S.M.
encephalopathy: a potential late effect of sport-related concussive and (2015). Systematic review of clinical studies examining biomarkers of
subconcussive head trauma. Clin. Sports Med. 30, 179–188. brain injury in athletes after sports-related concussion. J. Neurotrauma
6. Bailes, J.E., Dashnaw, M.L., Petraglia, A.L., and Turner, R.C. (2014). 32, 661-673.
Cumulative effects of repetitive mild traumatic brain injury. Prog. 20. Shahim, P., Linemann, T., Inekci, D., Karsdal, M.A., Blennow, K., Tegner, Y.,
Neurol. Surg. 28, 50–62. Zetterberg, H., and Henriksen, K. (2015). Serum tau fragments
7. Lehman, E.J., Hein, M.J., Baron, S.L., and Gersic, C.M. (2012). Neurodege- predict return to play in concussed professional ice hockey players.
nerative causes of death among retired National Football League J. Neurotrauma 33, 1995–1999.
players. Neurology 79, 1970–1974. 21. Giza, C.C., McCrea, M., Huber, D., Cameron, K.L., Houston, M.N., Jackson,
8. Kerr, Z.Y., Littleton, A.C., Cox, L.M., DeFreese, J.D., Varangis, E., Lynall, R.C., J.C., McGinty, G., Pasquina, P., Broglio, S.P., Brooks, A., DiFiori, J., Duma,
Schmidt, J.D., Marshall, S.W., and Guskiewicz, K.M. (2015). Estimating S., Harezlak, J., Goldman, J., Guskiewicz, K., McAllister, T.W., McArthur, D.,
contact exposure in football using the head impact exposure estimate. Meier, T.B., Mihalik, J.P., Nelson, L.D., Rowson, S., Gill, J., Investigators,
J. Neurotrauma 32, 1083–1089. C.C., Foroud, T., Katz, B., Saykin, A., Campbell, D.E., and Svoboda, S.
9. Clark, M.D., Varangis, E.M.L., Champagne, A.A., Giovanello, K.S., Shi, F., Kerr, (2021). Assessment of blood biomarker profile after acute concussion
Z.Y., Smith, J.K., and Guskiewicz, K.M. (2018). Effects of career duration, during combative training among US military cadets: a prospective
1348 PAPA ET AL.

study from the NCAA and US Department of Defense CARE Consortium. 27. Johnson, B., Neuberger, T., Gay, M., Hallett, M., and Slobounov, S. (2014).
JAMA Netw. Open 4, e2037731. Effects of subconcussive head trauma on the default mode network of
22. Oliver, J.M., Anzalone, A.J., Stone, J.D., Turner, S.M., Blueitt, D., Garrison, the brain. J. Neurotrauma 31, 1907–1913.
J.C., Askow, A.T., Luedke, J.A., and Jagim, A.R. (2019). Fluctuations in 28. Bahrami, N., Sharma, D., Rosenthal, S., Davenport, E.M., Urban, J.E.,
blood biomarkers of head trauma in NCAA football athletes over the Wagner, B., Jung, Y., Vaughan, C.G., Gioia, G.A., Stitzel, J.D., Whitlow, C.T.,
course of a season. J. Neurosurg. 130, 1655–1662. and Maldjian, J.A. (2016). Subconcussive head impact exposure and
23. Shahim, P., Politis, A., van der Merwe, A., Moore, B., Ekanayake, V., Lippa, white matter tract changes over a single season of youth football.
S.M., Chou, Y.Y., Pham, D.L., Butman, J.A., Diaz-Arrastia, R., Zetterberg, H., Radiology 281, 919–926.
Blennow, K., Gill, J.M., Brody, D.L., and Chan, L. (2020). Time course and 29. Abbas, K., Shenk, T.E., Poole, V.N., Breedlove, E.L., Leverenz, L.J., Nauman,
diagnostic utility of NfL, tau, GFAP, and UCH-L1 in subacute and chronic E.A., Talavage, T.M., and Robinson, M.E. (2015). Alteration of default
TBI. Neurology 95, e623–e636. mode network in high school football athletes due to repetitive
24. Papa, L., Brophy, G.M., Welch, R.D., Lewis, L.M., Braga, C.F., Tan, C.N., Ameli, subconcussive mild traumatic brain injury: a resting-state functional
N.J., Lopez, M.A., Haeussler, C.A., Mendez Giordano, D.I., Silvestri, S., magnetic resonance imaging study. Brain Connect. 5, 91–101.
Giordano, P., Weber, K.D., Hill-Pryor, C., and Hack, D.C. (2016). Time 30. Elkin, B.S., Gabler, L.F., Panzer, M.B., and Siegmund, G.P. (2019). Brain
course and diagnostic accuracy of glial and neuronal blood biomarkers tissue strains vary with head impact location: a possible explanation for
GFAP and UCH-L1 in a large cohort of trauma patients with and without increased concussion risk in struck versus striking football players. Clin.
mild traumatic brain injury. JAMA Neurol. 73, 551–560. Biomech. (Bristol, Avon) 64, 49–57.
25. McDonald, S.J., O’Brien, W.T., Symons, G.F., Chen, Z., Bain, J., Major, B.P., 31. Johnson, B., Walter, A.E., Wilkes, J.R., Papa, L., and Slobounov, S.M. (2021).
Costello, D., Yamakawa, G., Sun, M., Brady, R.D., Mitra, B., Mychasiuk, R., Changes in white matter of the cervical spinal cord after a single season
O’Brien, T.J., and Shultz, S.R. (2021). Prolonged elevation of serum of collegiate football. Neurotrauma Rep. 2, 84–93.
neurofilament light after concussion in male Australian football players. 32. Papa, L., Johnson, B., Walter, A.E., Wilkes, J.R., Knollmann-Ritschel, B.,
Biomark. Res. 9, 4. Bhomia, M., and Slobounov, S.M. (2021). Decreases in dorsal cervical
26. Papa, L., Brophy, G.M., Welch, R.D., Lewis, L.M., Braga, C.F., Tan, C.N., spinal cord white matter tract integrity are associated with elevated
Ameli, N.J., Lopez, M.A., Haeussler, C.A., Mendez Giordano, D.I., Sil- levels of serum microRNA biomarkers in NCAA Division I Collegiate
vestri, S., Giordano, P., Weber, K.D., Hill-Pryor, C., and Hack, D.C. (2016). football players. Neurotrauma Rep. 2, 476–487.
Time course and diagnostic accuracy of glial and neuronal blood 33. Nathanson, J.T., Connolly, J.G., Yuk, F., Gometz, A., Rasouli, J., Lovell, M.,
biomarkers GFAP and UCH-L1 in a large cohort of trauma patients and Choudhri, T. (2016). Concussion incidence in professional football:
with and without mild traumatic brain injury. JAMA Neurol. 73, 551– position-specific analysis with use of a novel metric. Orthop. J. Sports
560. Med. 4, 2325967115622621.

You might also like