You are on page 1of 61

Home Law Firm Law Library Laws

Jurisprudence Contact Us

July 2019 - Philippine Supreme Court Decisions/Resolutions

Philippine Supreme
Court Jurisprudence

Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 2019


> July 2019 Decisions > A.C. No. 10261 - RUFINA
LUY LIM, COMPLAINANT, v. ATTY. MANUEL V.
MENDOZA, RESPONDENT.:

A.C. No. 10261 - RUFINA LUY LIM, COMPLAINANT, v.


ATTY. MANUEL V. MENDOZA, RESPONDENT.

ChanRobles On-Line
EN BANC
Bar Review

A.C. No. 10261, July 16, 2019


RUFINA LUY LIM, COMPLAINANT, v. ATTY.
MANUEL V. MENDOZA, RESPONDENT.

DECISION

PER CURIAM:

Before the Court is a Complaint1 for Disbarment filed


by Rufina Luy Lim (Rufina) against Atty. Manuel V.
Mendoza (Atty. Mendoza) for violation of Canon 1,
Rules 1.01 and 1.02, Canon 7, Rule 7.03, Canon 8,
Rule 8.01, Canon 10, Rule 10.01, Canon 11, Rule 11.
03, and Canon 19, Rule 19.01 of the Code of
Professional Responsibility (CPR) and Section 20,

ChanRobles MCLE Rule 138 of the Rules of Court.

On-line
Rufina is the surviving spouse of Pastor Y. Lim

ChanRobles Lawnet Inc. -(Pastor) who died on June 11, 1994. She claimed
ChanRobles MCLE On-line :that during his lifetime, Pastor used conjugal funds to
organize
www.chanroblesmcleonline.com several dummy corporations2 (Skyline
International, Inc. (Skyline), Nell Mart, Inc. (Nell
Mart), etc.) using his mistresses and employees as
incorporators and/or stockholders, in order to defeat

her claims to said properties.3

On March 17, 1995, Rufina filed a Joint Petition


before the Regional Trial Court (RTC) of Quezon City
for the settlement of Pastor's estate. Miguel Lim
(Miguel), brother of Pastor, on behalf of his mother
Yao Hiong, filed a Petition for Intervention dated
August 17, 1995 categorically stating under oath that
Skyline, etc., are dummy corporations and that the
persons whose names appear as incorporators,
stockholders and officers thereof were mere
dummies. The Petition also averred that the parcels
of lands titled under the names of the corporations

were really owned by Pastor.4

The Petition for Intervention was executed before

Atty. Mendoza, as notary public.5 He also notarized


the affidavits of Teresa T. Lim, Lani G. Wenceslao,
Susan Sarcia-Sabado and Miguel, who all admitted
under oath that: Pastor created dummy corporations;
the purported stockholders thereof did not pay a
single centavo for shares under their names; and,
the affiants as directors, stockholders, or officers did
not have any actual participation in the operation of

said companies.6

Later, however, Atty. Mendoza, as counsel of Skyline,


argued that Skyline is the registered owner of several
real properties and that it has all the right to protect
its interest against Rufina. Rufina averred that Atty.
Mendoza made such allegation despite his knowledge
that Skyline is a dummy corporation and it has been
judicially declared as conjugal property of Rufina and
Pastor.

Rufina also claimed that Atty. Mendoza, acting as


Vice-President of Nell Mart demanded from the
tenants of lots covered by Transfer Certificates of
Title (TCT) Nos. 236236 and 236237 to vacate the
property, claiming that Nell Mart owned the same,
even while knowing that Nell Mart is a dummy
corporation.

Rufina finally averred that Atty. Mendoza used


intemperate language in his pleadings particularly
when he said that Rufina collected "BILLIONS OF
PESOS" as rentals which were "DISSIPATED ON HER

GAMBLING VICES."7

Atty. Mendoza, in his Answer, countered that Rufina


and Pastor were separated for more than 26 years by
the time Pastor died. On May 11, 1972, the couple
entered into an Agreement where they already
partitioned their conjugal properties. As for the issue
on dummy corporations, the RTC of Quezon City,
Branch 99 already held in Special Proceeding Case
No. Q-95-23334 that "the bank deposits in the
names of [Nell Mart] and Skunac Corporation x x x
which were found to be properties distinct from the
estate, are x x x not properties of the estate of xxx
Pastor x x x and are, therefore, ordered excluded

therefrom x x x."8

While he admitted having filed the Petition for


Intervention, he said that it was "pre-arranged
between Rufina Luy Lim and Miguel Y. Lim."
Unfortunately, Miguel and Yao Hiong died before they
could testify, hence the statements made in the

Petition for Intervention are mere hearsay.9

Atty. Mendoza further pointed out that this is the


second complaint filed by Rufina against him before
the Integrated Bar of the Philippines (IBP) involving
the same issue of ownership of the properties
covered by TCT Nos. 236236 and 236237 registered
in the name of Nell Mart. He claimed that Rufina filed
the disbarment complaints against him in retaliation

for her losses in other cases.10

IBP Report and Recommendation

On March 4, 2009, Commissioner Norberto B. Ruiz of


the IBP Commission on Bar Discipline (IBP-CBD)

issued his Report and Recommendation11


recommending the suspension of Atty. Mendoza from
the practice of law for two years.

The Report noted that although Atty. Mendoza


admitted that the 1972 Agreement may be improper,
he still argues that the same is valid between the
parties. Respondent's insistence on the validity of the
Agreement only betrays his ignorance of the law

which contravenes Canons 112 and 513 of the CPR.

The Report further observed that assuming that


respondent drafted the Petition for Intervention,
since he signed the same, the presumption is that
the contents thereof are true and correct, as in fact,
his client attested to the truthfulness of the contents
thereof. To later assail the truthfulness of the Petition
for Intervention, alleging that it was a pre-arranged
agreement between his client and the complainant,
shows that respondent actually lied to the courts.

The Report further noted that despite his knowledge


about the irregularity in the issuance of shares in Nell
Mart, he still acquired shares of stocks and even
claimed to be a buyer in good faith.

As a notary, he notarized affidavits which in effect


attested to repeated violations of the Corporation
Code, without any showing that he even attempted
to caution his clients of the illegality of their acts.
Respondent also did not deny using offensive
language in his pleadings. Finally, the Report noted
that respondent's Position Paper lacked Professional
Tax Receipt Number, IBP Receipt or Lifetime Number,
Roll of Attorneys Number and his Mandatory
Continuing Legal Education (MCLE), in clear violation

of Bar Matter Nos. 1132 and 1922.14

On April 16, 2013, the IBP Board of Governors


passed a Resolution approving and adopting the
Commission's report and recommendation.

It reads: cralawred

RESOLUTION No. XX-2013-510


CBD Case No. 08-2263
July-2019 Rufina Luy Lim vs.
Jurisprudence Atty. Manuel V. Mendoza

RESOLVED to ADOPT and APPROVE, as it


is hereby unanimously ADOPTED and
G.R. No. 233535 -
APPROVED, the Report and
PEOPLE OF THE
Recommendation of the Investigating
PHILIPPINES,
Commissioner in the above-entitled case,
PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
herein made part of this Resolution as
v. WILLIAM
Annex "A", and finding the
RODRIGUEZ Y
recommendation fully supported by the
BANTOTO, ACCUSED-
evidence on record and the applicable
APPELLANT.
laws and rules and considering that
Respondent violated Canons 1, 5, 10 and
G.R. No. 229509 - Rule 10.01 of the Code of Professional
PEOPLE OF THE Responsibility, Atty. Manuel V. Mendoza is
PHILIPPINES, hereby SUSPENDED from the practice
PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, of law for two (2) years.15
v. BABYLYN
MANANSALA Y CRUZ, chanRoblesvirtualLaw1ibrary

ACCUSED-APPELLANT.
The Court's Ruling

G.R. No. 223434 - We adopt the findings of the IBP Board of Governors.
SUSAN GALANG AND Considering however that this is not the respondent's
BERNADETH ALBINO, first infraction, the penalty of disbarment, instead of
IN REPRESENTATION mere suspension, is in order.
FOR BRENDA FAGYAN,
It has been pronounced, time and again, that the
EDMUND FAGYAN,
practice of law is a privilege bestowed on those who
MARJORIE CADAWENG,
show that they possess and continue to possess the
AND THEIR
legal qualifications for it. Lawyers are expected to
SUCCESSORS-IN-
maintain at all times a high standard of legal
INTEREST: VENUS
proficiency and morality, including honesty, integrity
ALBINO, ERICKSON
and fair dealing. They must perform a four-fold duty
GALANG, MICHELLE
to society, the legal profession, the courts and their
GALANG, PABLO
clients, in accordance with the values and norms of
PADAWIL, GRACE
LILIBETH YANZON, the legal profession as embodied in the CPR.16

JEFFERSON DUPING,
The Lawyer's Oath enjoins every lawyer, not just to
SPS. JONATHAN JAVIER
obey the laws of the land, but also to refrain from
AND DOMINGA JAVIER,
doing any falsehood in or out of court or from
CELINE WAKAT,
consenting to the doing of any in court, and to
DUSTIN LICNACHAN,
conduct himself according to the best of his
MARTHA PODES, LUCIA
knowledge and discretion with all good fidelity to the
PANGKET, SPS. MARK
courts, as well as to his clients. All lawyers are
SIBAYAN AND BELINDA
servants of the law, and have to observe and
SIBAYAN, SPS.
maintain the rule of law, as well as be exemplars
ANTONIO SO HU AND
worthy of emulation by others. It is by no means a
SOLEDAD SO HU, AND
coincidence, therefore, that the CPR emphatically
SPS. EDUARDO
reiterates the core values of honesty, integrity, and
CALIXTO AND PHOEBE
trustworthiness.17
CALIXTO,
PETITIONERS, v. Canon 10 of the CPR stresses that a lawyer owes
VERONICA WALLIS, candor, fairness and good faith to the court.
NELSON INAGCONG
While Rule 10.01 states:
SUMERWE, MANUEL
cralawred
KADATAR, FELINO Rule 10.01 � A lawyer shall not do any
EUGENIO, VICTORIA S. falsehood, nor consent to the doing of any
CERDON, JOANNA in Court; nor shall he mislead, or allow
MARIE F. CASANDRA, the Court to be misled by any artifice.
APOLINARIO D.
As properly observed by the IBP-CBD, respondent
MORENO, SPOUSES
drafted and signed the Petition for Intervention which
LARRY AND MARITES
avers in essence that the subject corporations,
EDADES, EVANGELINE
Skyline, etc., were mere dummies created by the late
B. CAPPLEMAN, PILAR
T. QUILACIO, MARLON Pastor Lim.18 He also notarized the affidavits of

SIBAYAN, DAISY MAE Teresa Lim, Lani Wenceslao and Susan Sabado

RIVER, ROSITA stating in essence that they were dummies in the

AGASEN, JOAN corporations of Pastor.19


CIRIACO, FLORABEL N.
Respondent in his Position Paper before the IBP-CBD
FLORDELIS, SPOUSES
claimed however that the statements in the Petition
THEODORE UY AND
for Intervention, as well as the Affidavits in support
JHOANNA UY, SPOUSES
thereto were not his statements. The petition was
WILBER NGAY-OS AND
filed pursuant to "agreed arrangements" between
CRISTINA NGAY-OS,
complainant and the late Miguel Lim and that the
AND ALL PERSONS
assignment of shares of stock by Miguel to him, was
ACTING UNDER THEIR
a "pre-arranged agreement as payments for
AUTHORITY AND
attorney's fees and for reimbursements of whatever
DIRECTION, THE
litigations [sic] expenses advanced by the
MUNICIPAL
respondent."20
ASSESSOR'S OFFICE
OF ITOGON, THE The flip-flopping averments of respondent in his
PROVINCIAL pleadings betray a lack of forthrightness and
ASSESSOR'S OFFICE transparency on his part. He initially averred,
OF BENGUET, AND through the Petition for Intervention and supporting
DEPARTMENT OF affidavits which he signed and notarized, that the
ENVIRONMENT AND corporations were dummies of Pastor. He now claims,
NATURAL RESOURCES, however, that the statements in the Petition were
RESPONDENTS. mere hearsay and that the shares of stocks he now
owns in the corporations were actually payments to
G.R. No. 232678 - him for his services and advances.
ESTEBAN DONATO
REYES, PETITIONER, v. With the incompatibility of the two positions, it is

PEOPLE OF THE clear that respondent has been less than truthful in

PHILIPPINES, at least one occasion. This, we cannot countenance.

RESPONDENT.
As officers of the court, lawyers are expected to act
G.R. No. 239986 - with complete candor. They may not resort to the use
ROMA FE C. VILLALON, of deception, not just in some, but in all their
PETITIONER, v. RURAL dealings. The CPR bars lawyers from committing or
BANK OF AGOO, INC., consenting to any falsehood, or from misleading or
RESPONDENT. allowing the court to be misled by any artifice or
guile in finding the truth. Needless to say, complete
A.C. No. 9057 and absolute honesty is expected of lawyers when
(Formerly CBD Case they appear and plead before the courts. Any act that
No. 12-3413) - ARLENE obstructs or impedes the administration of justice
O. BAUTISTA, constitutes misconduct which merits disciplinary
COMPLAINANT, v. ATTY. action on lawyers.21
ZENAIDA M. FERRER,
RESPONDENT. As a lawyer, respondent is expected to be a disciple
of truth, having sworn upon his admission to the Bar

G.R. No. 231917 - that he would do no falsehood nor consent to the

PEOPLE OF THE doing of any in court, and that he would conduct

PHILIPPINES, himself as a lawyer according to the best of his

PLAINTIFF-APPELEE, v. knowledge and discretion with all good fidelity as well

ANSARI SARIP Y to the courts as to his clients.22


BANTOG, ACCUSED-
Respondent should bear in mind that as an officer of
APPELLANT.
the court, his high vocation is to correctly inform the
court upon the law and the facts of the case and to
G.R. No. 242018 -
aid it in doing justice and arriving at a correct
PEOPLE OF THE
conclusion. Courts meanwhile are entitled to expect
PHILIPPINES,
only complete honesty from lawyers appearing and
PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
pleading before them.23
v. LYNDON CA�ETE*
Y FERNANDEZ AND This respondent failed to do.
PETERLOU PIMENTEL Y
BENDEBEL, ACCUSED- Respondent also cannot feign ignorance as to the

APPELLANTS. veracity of the statements in the petition because he

signed the same.24 Lest respondent forgot, a


G.R. No. 225847 - counsel's signature on a pleading is neither an empty
DANILO L. PACIO, formality nor even a mere means for identification. It
PETITIONER, v. is a solemn component of legal practice that through
DOHLE-PHILMAN a counsel's signature, a positive declaration is made.
MANNING AGENCY, In certifying through his signature that he has read
INC., DOHLE (IOM) the pleading, that there is ground to support it, and
LIMITED, AND/OR that it is not interposed for delay, a lawyer asserts his

competence, credibility, and ethics.25


MANOLO T. GACUTAN, Respondent also erred in asserting that while the May
RESPONDENTS. 11, 1972 Agreement between Rufina and Pastor was
"improper for notarial act," it has "binding effect
G.R. No. 222870 - against third persons." The Agreement in essence
JESSIE TAGASTASON, was a contract entered into by the parties, separating
ROGELIO their present and future properties, with Rufina
TAGASTASON, JR., waiving her support from Pastor and both spouses
ANNIE BACALA- waiving any future action between them, whether
TAGASTASON, AND civil or criminal.26
JERSON TAGASTASON,
PETITIONERS, v. The sworn obligation of every lawyer to respect the

PEOPLE OF THE law and the legal processes is a continuing condition

PHILIPPINES, OFFICE for retaining membership in the profession.27 He is


OF THE SPECIAL also expected to keep abreast of legal
PROSECUTOR OF developments.28 To claim that such agreement is
BUTUAN CITY, SUSANO binding against third persons shows either
BACALA, AND BELINDA respondent's ignorance of the law or his wanton
BACALA, disregard for the laws of the land. Either of which
RESPONDENTS. deserves disciplinary sanction.

Respondent likewise failed to use temperate and


G.R. No. 229675 -
respectful language in his pleading against
PEOPLE OF THE
complainant. In his Comment in Special Proceeding
PHILIPPINES,
Case No. Q-95-23334 before RTC-QC Branch 77,
APPELLEE, v. JOHN
respondent averred that Rufina collected "BILLIONS
ORCULLO Y SUSA,
OF PESOS" in rent which were "DISSIPATED ON HER
APPELLANT.
GAMBLING VICES."29

G.R. No. 230923 -


The Code provides that a "lawyer shall not, in his
BDO UNIBANK, INC.,
professional dealings, use language that is abusive,
PETITIONER, v.
offensive or otherwise improper." Lawyers are
FRANCISCO PUA,
instructed to be gracious and must use such words as
RESPONDENT.
may be properly addressed by one gentleman to
another. Our language is rich with expressions that
G.R. No. 208920 -
are emphatic but respectful, convincing but not
JAIME BILAN
derogatory, illuminating but not offensive.30
MONTEALEGRE AND
CHAMON'TE, INC., Here, respondent, in his eagerness to advance his
PETITIONERS, v. client's cause, imputed on Rufina derogatory traits
SPOUSES ABRAHAM that are damaging to her reputation.
AND REMEDIOS DE Finally, respondent failed to indicate in his Position
VERA, RESPONDENTS. Paper material information required by the rules.
These are, the Professional Tax Receipt Number, IBP
G.R. No. 213760 - Receipt or Lifetime Number, Roll of Attorneys Number
REYNALDO SANTIAGO, and his MCLE, in violation of Bar Matter Nos. 1132
JR. Y SANTOS, and 1922.
PETITIONER, v. PEOPLE
These requirements are not vain formalities or mere
OF THE PHILIPPINES,
frivolities. Rather, these requirements ensure that
RESPONDENT.
only those who have satisfied the requisites for legal
practice are able to engage in it. To willfully disregard
G.R. No. 213198 -
them is to willfully disregard mechanisms put in place
GENEVIEVE ROSAL
to facilitate integrity, competence and credibility in
ARREZA, A.K.A.
"GENEVIEVE ARREZA legal practice.31

TOYO," PETITIONER, v.
In Sosa v. Atty.Mendoza,32 this Court found
TETSUSHI TOYO,
respondent guilty of violating Rule 1.01 of the CPR,
LOCAL CIVIL
for his willful failure to pay a loan in the amount of
REGISTRAR OF
P500,000.00. The Court ordered his suspension from
QUEZON CITY, AND
the practice of law for one year with a stern warning
THE ADMINISTRATOR
that a commission of the same or similar offense will
AND CIVIL REGISTRAR
result in the imposition of a more severe penalty. In
GENERAL OF THE
said case, the Court declared that Atty. Mendoza's
NATIONAL STATISTICS
"failure to honor his just debt constitutes dishonest
OFFICE,
and deceitful conduct x x x [which is] compounded
RESPONDENTS.
by Atty. Mendoza's act of interjecting flimsy excuses
that only strengthened the conclusion that he refused
G.R No. 231358 -
to pay a valid and just debt."33
PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES, The string of offenses committed by respondent
PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, betrays his propensity to ignore, disrespect and make
v. ERNESTO AVELINO, a mockery of the judicial institution he has vowed to
JR. Y GRACILLIAN,[*] honor and protect. His violations, in not just one
ACCUSED-APPELLANT. instance, show his recalcitrant character, undeserving
of the privilege to practice in the legal profession.
G.R. No. 206026 -
JMA AGRICULTURAL It cannot be stressed enough that membership in the

DEVELOPMENT Bar is a privilege laden with conditions, granted only

CORPORATION, to those who possess the strict intellectual and moral

PETITIONER, v. LAND qualifications required of lawyers as instruments in

BANK OF THE the effective and efficient administration of justice.


As officers of the courts and keepers of the public's
PHILIPPINES, faith, lawyers are burdened with the highest degree
RESPONDENT. of social responsibility. They are mandated to behave
at all times in a manner that is consistent with truth
G.R. No. 226556 - and honor and are expected to maintain not only
POWER SECTOR legal proficiency, but also a high standard of morality,
ASSETS AND honesty, integrity and fair dealing.34
LIABILITIES
MANAGEMENT WHEREFORE, Atty. Manuel V. Mendoza is

CORPORATION, DISBARRED from the practice of law for violation of

PETITIONER, v. Canons 1, 5, and 10 and Rule 10.01 of the Code of

COMMISSIONER OF Professional Responsibility, and his name is ordered

INTERNAL REVENUE, STRICKEN OFF the Roll of Attorneys.

RESPONDENT.
This Decision shall be immediately executory.

G.R. No. 229053 - Let copies of this Decision be furnished the Office of
PEOPLE OF THE the Court Administrator for its distribution to all

PHILIPPINES, courts of the land; the Integrated Bar of the


PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, Philippines; and the Office of the Bar Confidant, to be
v. JORDAN CASACLANG entered into Atty. Mendoza's personal records as a
DELA CRUZ, ACCUSED- member of the Philippine Bar.
APPELLANT.
SO ORDERED.

G.R. No. 214163 - cralawlawlibrary

RONALD GERALINO M.
LIM AND THE PEOPLE Bersamin (C.J.), Carpio, Peralta, Leonen, Jardeleza,

OF THE PHILIPPINES, Caguioa, A. Reyes, Jr., Gesmundo, J. Reyes, Jr.,

PETITIONERS, v. Hernando, Carandang, Lazaro-Javier, and Inting, JJ.,

EDWIN M. LIM, concur.

RESPONDENT. Del Castillo and Perlas-Bernabe, JJ., on official leave.

G.R. No. 237020 - �


DOMINIC INOCENTES,
NOTICE OF JUDGMENT
JEFFREY INOCENTES,
JOSEPH CORNELIO Sirs/Mesdames: cralawred

AND REYMARK
CATANGUI, Please take notice that on July 16, 2019 a Decision,

PETITIONERS, v. R. copy attached herewith, was rendered by the

SYJUCO Supreme Court in the above-entitled case, the

CONSTRUCTION, INC. original of which was received by this Office on

(RSCI)/ARCH. RYAN I. September 11, 2019 at 8:49 a.m.


SYJUCO,
RESPONDENTS. Very truly yours,

G.R. No. 225899 -


(Sgd.) EDGAR O. ARICHETA
JESSIE C. ESTEVA,
Clerk of Court
PETITIONER, v.
WILHELMSEN SMITH
BELL MANNING, INC. Endnotes:
AND WILHELMSEN
SHIP MANAGEMENT 1Rollo, Vol. I, pp. 2-11.
AND/OR FAUSTO R.
PREYSLER, JR., 2 These are: Skunac Corporation, Skunac
RESPONDENTS. International, Inc., Leslim Corporation,
Nell Mart, Inc. formerly Marcas
G.R. No. 214593 - Corporation, Precise Distributing, Inc.,
DANA S. SANTOS, Uniwide Distributing, Inc., Accurate
PETITIONER, v. Distributing, Inc., Nellim Distributing, Inc.,
LEODEGARIO R. Alliance Marketing, Inc., Speed
SANTOS, Distributing, Inc., Skyline Realty, Inc.,
RESPONDENT. Autotruck TBA Corporation, Universum
Sales Corporation, Active Distributors,
A.M. No. P-18-3890 Inc., Skyline International, Inc., Skyline
(Formerly OCA IPI No. Sales Corporation, Terelim Corporation,
16-4536-P) - ARLENE Action Company and Maganda Marketing;
S. PINEDA, id. at 3.
COMPLAINANT, v.
3 Id. at 2.
SHERIFF JAIME N.
SANTOS,
4 Id. at 3-4.
RESPONDENT.

5 Registered in his Notarial Books as Doc.


G.R. No. 233697 -
No. 309, Page No. 63, Book No. III,
PEOPLE OF THE
Series of 1995, id. at 4 and 20.
PHILIPPINES,
PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, 6 Id. at 4.
v. ARNELLO REFE Y
7 Id. at 7.
GONZALES, ACCUSED-
APPELLANT.
8 Id. at 131-132.

G.R. No. 228000 - 9 Id. at 133.


PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES, 10 Id. at 135-137.
PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, 11 Id. at 616-622.
v. RONALD PALEMA Y
12 Canon 1 - A lawyer shall uphold the
VARGAS, RUFEL
PALMEA Y BAUTISTA, constitution, obey the laws of the land
LYNDON SALDUA Y and promote respect for law and legal
QUEZON, AND VIRGO processes.
GRENGIA, ACCUSED-
13 Canon 5 - A lawyer shall keep abreast
APPELLANTS.
of legal developments, participate in
continuing legal education programs,
G.R. No. 227899 -
support the efforts to achieve high
PEOPLE OF THE
standards in law schools as well as in the
PHILIPPINES,
practical training of law students and
PETITIONER, v. COURT
assist in disseminating information
OF APPEALS, P/SUPT.
regarding the law and jurisprudence.
DIONICIO BORROMEO
Y CARBONEL AND 14Rollo, Vol. I, pp. 618-622.
SPO1 JOEY ABANG Y
ARCE, RESPONDENTS. 15 Id. at 615.

16Molina v. Atty. Magat, 687 Phil. 1, 5


G.R. No. 229943 -
PEOPLE OF THE (2012).
PHILIPPINES,
17Samonte v. Jumamil, A.C. No. 11668,
PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
July 17, 2017, 831 SCRA 180, 188, citing
v. EDGAR ROBLES,
Spouses Umaguing v. Atty. De Vera, 753
WILFREDO ROBLES,
Phil. 11, 19 (2015).
ROLANDO ROBLES
ALIAS "BEBOT," DANTE 18Rollo, Vol. I, pp. 14-21.
ARON (DECEASED),
DANILO ROBLES ALIAS 19 Id. at 22-24.
"TOTO," JOSE ROBLES
20 Id. at 431.
(DECEASED),
ACCUSED; EDGAR
21Heirs of the late Romero v. Atty. Reyes,
ROBLES AND
Jr., 499 Phil. 624, 630-631 (2005).
WILFREDO ROBLES,
ACCUSED- 22Apolinar-Petilo v. Maramot, A.C. No.
APPELLANTS.
9067, January 31, 2018.

G.R No. 237486 - 23 Id.


PHILCO AERO, INC.,*
24 See rollo, Vol. I, p. 20.
PETITIONER, v.
DEPARTMENT OF 25Intestate Estate of Jose Uy v. Atty.
TRANSPORTATION Maghari, 768 Phil. 10, 22 (2015).
SECRETARY ARTHUR P.
26See rollo, Vol. I, p. 617.
TUGADE, BASES
CONVERSION AND
27Ortigas Plaza Development Corp. v.
DEVELOPMENT
Tumulak, A.C. No. 11385, March 14,
AUTHORITY, VIVENCIO
2017, 820 SCRA 232, 246.
B. DIZON, MEGAWIDE
CONSTRUCTION CORP., 28See Code of Professional Responsibility,
AND GMR
Canon 5.
INFRASTRUCTURE
LTD., DOING BUSINESS 29Rollo, Vol. I, pp. 122-123.
AS JOINT VENTURERS
30Washington v. Atty. Dicen, A.C. No.
UNDER THE NAME AND
STYLE OF MEGAWIDE- 12137, July 9, 2018.
GMR, RESPONDENTS.
31Intestate Estate of Jose Uy v. Maghari,
supra note 25, at 26.
G.R. No. 216574 -
FACT-FINDING 32 756 Phil. 490 (2015).
INVESTIGATION
BUREAU (FFIB) - 33 Id. at 499.
OFFICE OF THE
34Cobalt Resources, Inc. v. Atty. Aguado,
DEPUTY OMBUDSMAN
FOR THE MILITARY 784 Phil. 318, 332-333 (2016).
AND OTHER LAW
ENFORCEMENT
OFFICES, PETITIONER,
v. RENATO P.
Back to Home | Back to Main
MIRANDA,
RESPONDENT.

G.R. No. 223624 -


HEIRS OF LEONARDA
NADELA TOMAKIN,
NAMELY: LUCAS
NADELA, OCTAVIO N.
TOMAKIN, ROMEO N.
TOMAKIN, MA.
CRISTETA* T.
PANOPIO, AND
CRESCENCIO**
TOMAKIN, JR.
(DECEASED),
REPRESENTED BY HIS
HEIRS, BARBARA JEAN
R. TOMAKIN
RAFOLS*** AND
CRISTINA JEAN R.
TOMAKIN,
PETITIONERS, v. HEIRS
OF CELESTINO
NAVARES, NAMELY:
ERMINA N. JACA,
NORMITA NAVARES,
FELINDA N. BALLENA,
RHODORA N.
SINGSON, CRISTINA N.
CAL ORTIZ, ROCELYN
N. SENCIO, JAIME B.
NAVARES, CONCHITA
N. BAYOT, PROCULO
NAVARES, LIDUVINA N.
VALLE, MA. DIVINA N.
ABIS, VENUSTO B.
NAVARES AND
RACHELA N. TAHIR,
RESPONDENTS.

G.R. No. 233850 -


TRADE AND
INVESTMENT
DEVELOPMENT
CORPORATION OF THE
PHILIPPINES ALSO
KNOWN AS PHILIPPINE
EXPORT-IMPORT
CREDIT AGENCY,
PETITIONER, v.
PHILIPPINE VETERANS
BANK, RESPONDENT.
G.R. No. 231361 -
PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES,
PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v. RESSURRECCION
RESSURRECCION Y
ROBLES,* JONATHAN
MANUEL Y OTIG,
ANICETO DECENA Y
GONZAGA, JERRY
ROBLES Y UNATO,
ACCUSED, CAROL
ALCANTARA Y MAPATA
AND JOSELITO CRUZ Y
DE GUZMAN,
ACCUSED-APELLANTS.

G.R. No. 228951 -


THE PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES
PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v. JAY GODOY
MANCAO, ACCUSED-
APPELLANT.

G.R. Nos. 203076-


77 - AZUCENA E.
BAYANI, PETITIONER,
v. EDUARDO,
LEONORA, VIRGILIO,
VILMA, CYNTHIA AND
NANCY, ALL
SURNAMED YU AND
MR. ALFREDO T.
PALLANAN,
RESPONDENTS. [G.R.
NOS. 206765 and
207214] HEIRS OF
CONCEPCION NON
ANDRES, NAMELY:
SERGIO, JR.,
SOFRONIO AND
GRACELDA, ALL
SURNAMED ANDRES,
PETITIONERS, v. HEIRS
OF MELENCIO YU AND
TALINANAP
MATUALAGA, NAMELY:
EDUARDO, LEONORA,
VIRGILIO, VILMA,
CYNTHIA, IMELDA AND
NANCY, ALL
SURNAMED YU; THE
PROVINCIAL SHERIFF
OF GENERAL SANTOS
CITY; MR. ALFREDO T.
PALLANAN, IN HIS
CAPACITY AS DEPUTY
SHERIFF OF THE
REGIONAL TRIAL
COURT (BRANCH 36),
GENERAL SANTOS
CITY; AND HON. ISAAC
ALVERO V. MORAN,
PRESIDING JUDGE OF
THE REGIONAL TRIAL
COURT (BRANCH 36),
GENERAL SANTOS
CITY; YARD URBAN
HOMEOWNERS
ASSOCIATION, INC.,
HEREIN REPRESENTED
BY ITS PRESIDENT,
ROGELIO ENERO,
RESPONDENTS.

G.R. No. 237553 -


BDO UNIBANK, INC.,
PETITIONER, v.
ANTONIO CHOA,
RESPONDENT.
G.R. No. 213009 -
BOOKMEDIA PRESS,
INC. AND BENITO J.
BRIZUELA,
PETITIONERS, v.
LEONARDO*
SINAJON** AND YANLY
ABENIR,
RESPONDENTS.

G.R No. 232094 -


PARINA R. JABINAL,
PETITIONER, v. HON.
OVERALL DEPUTY
OMBUDSMAN,
RESPONDENT.

G.R. No. 233781 -


DEPARTMENT OF
LABOR AND
EMPLOYMENT (DOLE),
PETITIONER, v.
KENTEX
MANUFACTURING
CORPORATION AND
ONG KING GUAN,
RESPONDENTS.

G.R No. 205022 -


CARLITO L. MIRANDO,
JR., PETITIONER, v.
PHILIPPINE CHARITY
AND SWEEPSTAKES
OFFICE AND
MANOLITO MORATO,
RESPONDENTS.

G.R. No. 242315 -


RIEL ARANAS Y
DIMAALA, PETITIONER,
v. PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES,
RESPONDENT.

G.R. No. 225007 -


SAN MIGUEL FOODS,
INC. AND JAMES A.
VINOYA, PETITIONERS,
v. ERNESTO RAOUL V.
MAGTUTO,
RESPONDENT.

G.R. No. 220434 -


SM DEVELOPMENT
CORPORATION, JOANN
HIZON, ATTY. MENA
OJEDA, JR., AND
ROSALINE QUA,
PETITIONERS, v.
TEODORE GILBERT
ANG, RESPONDENT.

G.R. No. 209072 -


ARLENE A.
CUARTOCRUZ,
PETITIONER, v. ACTIVE
WORKS, INC., AND MA.
ISABEL E. HERMOSA,
BRANCH MANAGER,
RESPONDENTS.

G.R. No. 191902 -


MARINO B. DAANG,
PETITIONER, v.
SKIPPERS UNITED
PACIFIC, INC. AND
COMMERCIAL S.A.,
RESPONDENTS.
A.M. No. RTJ-19-
2562 (Formerly A.M.
No. 18-10-234-RTC) -
OFFICE OF THE COURT
ADMINISTRATOR,
COMPLAINANT, v. HON.
PHILIP G. SALVADOR
PRESIDING JUDGE,
REGIONAL TRIAL
COURT OF LAOAG CITY,
ILOCOS NORTE,
BRANCH 13, AND
ACTING PRESIDING
JUDGE, REGIONAL
TRIAL COURT OF
BATAC CITY, ILOCOS
NORTE, BRANCH 17,
RESPONDENT.

G.R. No. 212520 -


COCA-COLA BOTTLERS
PHILIPPINES, INC.,
PETITIONER, v.
ANTONIO P. MAGNO,
JR. AND MELCHOR L.
OCAMPO, JR.,
RESPONDENTS.

G.R. No. 232071 -


PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES,
PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v. BBB, ACCUSED-
APPELLANT.

G.R. No. 216949 -


EDUARDO T. BATAC,
PETITIONER, v. OFFICE
OF THE OMBUDSMAN,
TEDDY C. TUMANG,
RAFAEL P. YABUT, AND
PANTALEON C.
MARTIN,
RESPONDENTS.

G.R. No. 238299 -


EMMANUELITO LIMBO
Y PAGUIO,
PETITIONER, v. PEOPLE
OF THE PHILIPPINES,
RESPONDENT.

G.R. No. 217529 -


DIGITEL EMPLOYEES
UNION, PETITIONER, v.
DIGITAL TELECOMS
PHILIPPINES, INC.,
RESPONDENT.

G.R. No. 235662 -


THE PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES,
PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v. XXX, ACCUSED-
APPELLANT.

G.R. No. 229836 -


THE PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES,
PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v. XXXXXXXXXXX,
ACCUSED-APPELLANT.

G.R. No. 192956 -


VENUS BATAYOLA
BAGUIO, JUPITER
BATAYOLA, MANUEL
BATAYOLA, JR.,
ISABELO
BATAYOLA,RAMILO
BATAYOLA, RAUL
BATAYOLA, LEONARDO
BATAYOLA, MILAGROS
BATAYOLA, JULIETA
BATAYOLA CANTILLAS,
ENRIQUETA BATAYOLA
ROSACENA, FELICIANO
BATAYOLA,
ONESEFERO PACINA,
VERONICA FERNANDEZ
BATAYOLA, LUCIO
HUBAHIB, VICENTA
REVILLA, PERLA
UMBAO, BRIGILDA
MORADAS, AND THE
REGIONAL DIRECTOR,
DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND
NATURAL RESOURCES
VII, PETITIONERS, v.
HEIRS OF RAMON
ABELLO, NAMELY: THE
LATE LOLITA ABELLO
DE SEARES,
REPRESENTED BY HER
HEIRS: ROSARIO A.
JIMENEZ, CANDELARIA
A. CHAN LIM, RAFAEL
ABELLO AND HEIDE
ABELLO CABALUNA,
AND THE LATE
EDUARDO ABELLO,
REPRESENTED BY HIS
HEIRS SANDRA S.
ABELLO AND IAN
GERARD S. ABELLO,
RESPONDENTS.[G.R.
No. 193032] HEIRS OF
RAMON ABELLO,
NAMELY: THE LATE
LOLITA ABELLO DE
SEARES,
REPRESENTED BY HER
HEIRS: ROSARIO A.
JIMENEZ, CANDELARIA
A. CHAN LIM, RAFAEL
ABELLO AND HEIDE
ABELLO CABALUNA,
AND THE LATE
EDUARDO ABELLO,
REPRESENTED BY HIS
HEIRS SANDRA S.
ABELLO AND IAN
GERARD S. ABELLO,
PETITIONERS, v.
VENUS BATAYOLA
BAGUIO, JUPITER
BATAYOLA, MANUEL
BATAYOLA, JR.,
ISABELO BATAYOLA,
RAMILO BATAYOLA,
RAUL BATAYOLA,
LEONARDO BATAYOLA,
MILAGROS BATAYOLA,
JULIETA BATAYOLA
CANTILLAS,
ENRIQUETA BATAYOLA
ROSACENA, FELICIANO
BATAYOLA,
ONESEFERO PACINA,
VERONICA FERNANDEZ
BATAYOLA, LUCIO
HUBAHIB, VICENTA
REVILLA, PERLA
UMBAO, BRIGILDA
MORADAS, AND THE
REGIONAL DIRECTOR,
DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND
NATURAL RESOURCES
VII, RESPONDENTS.
G.R. No. 228828 -
PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES,
PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v. ZZZ, ACCUSED-
APPELLANT.

G.R. No. 201576 -


PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES,
PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v. ANALYN ADVINCULA
Y PIEDAD, ACCUSED-
APPELLANT.

G.R. Nos. 233853-


54 - CAMILO LOYOLA
SABIO (FORMER
CHAIRMAN),
PETITIONER, v.
SANDIGANBAYAN
(FIRST DIVISION),
RESPONDENT.

G.R. No. 235799 -


JASPER MONROY Y
MORA, PETITIONER, v.
PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES,
RESPONDENT.

G.R. No. 232338 -


PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES,
PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v. PROMULGATED:
RAMON QUILLO Y
ESMANI, ACCUSED-
APPELLANT.
G.R No. 242682 -
PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES,
PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v. NERISSA MORA
A.K.A. NERI BALAGTA
MORA AND MARIA
SALOME POLVORIZA,
ACCUSED, NERISSA
MORA A.K.A. NERI
BALAGTA MORA
ACCUSED-APPELLANT.

G.R. No. 222939 -


MECO MANNING &
CREWING SERVICES,
INC. AND CAPT.
IGMEDIO G. SORRERA,
PETITIONERS, v.
CONSTANTINO R.
CUYOS, RESPONDENT.

G.R. No. 221366 -


CITY OF MANILA,
PETITIONER, v.
ALEJANDRO ROCES
PRIETO, BENITO
ROCES PRIETO,
MERCEDES PRIETO
DELGADO, MONICA
LOPEZ PRIETO,
MARTIN LOPEZ
PRIETO, BEATRIZ
PRIETO DE LEON,
RAFAEL ROCES
PRIETO, BENITO
LEGARDA, INC.,
ALEGAR
CORPORATION,
BENITO LEGARDA, JR.,
PECHATEN
CORPORATION, ESTATE
OF ROSARIO M. LLORA,
AND ALL PERSONS
CLAIMING INTERESTS
AGAINST THEM,
RESPONDENTS.

G.R. No. 235468 -


PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES,
PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v. DAN DUMANJUG Y
LORE�A,[*]
ACCUSED-APPELLANT.

G.R. No. 225339 -


PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES
PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v. xxxxxxxxxxx
ACCUSED-APPELLANT.

G.R. No. 234531 -


AGUSAN WOOD
INDUSTRIES, INC.,
PETITIONER, v.
SECRETARY OF THE
DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND
NATURAL RESOURCES,
RESPONDENT.

G.R No. 219614 -


PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES,
PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v. PONCIANO ESPINA Y
BALASANTOS ALIAS
"JUN ESPINA AND JR",
ACCUSED-APPELLANT.
G.R. No. 232669 -
COCA-COLA FEMSA
PHILIPPINES,
PETITIONER, v.
RICARDO S.
MACAPAGAL, ENER A.
MANARANG, REMIGIO
E. MERCADO, DANILO
Z. FABIAN, ALBERT P.
TAN, EDUARDO N.
ABULENCIA, JR.,
REYNALDO G. PINEDA,
ERIC A. ABAD SANTOS,
WILFREDO C. DELA
CRUZ, MANUEL T.
CAPARAS, EDGARDO R.
NAVARRO, NESTOR L.
RAYO, AND INOCENCIO
M. ARAO,
RESPONDENTS.

G.R No. 207152 -


HEIRS OF PABLITO
ARELLANO, NAMELY,
ELENA ARELLANO,
REYNANTE ARELLANO,
AND RUBY ARELLANO,
PETITIONERS, v.
MARIA TOLENTINO,
RESPONDENT.

G.R. No. 226021 -


REPUBLIC OF THE
PHILIPPINES,
REPRESENTED BY THE
DEPARTMENT OF
PUBLIC WORKS AND
HIGHWAYS,
PETITIONER, v.
GILDA[*] A.
BARCELON, HAROLD A.
BARCELON, AND
HAZEL A. BARCELON,
RESPONDENTS.

G.R. No. 227960 -


REPUBLIC OF THE
PHILIPPINES
[REPRESENTED BY THE
DEPARMENT OF PUBLIC
WORKS AND
HIGHWAYS (DPWH)],
PETITIONER, v.
SPOUSES LORENZANA
JUAN DARLUCIO AND
COSME DARLUCIO,
RESPONDENTS.

A.C. No. 10261 -


RUFINA LUY LIM,
COMPLAINANT, v. ATTY.
MANUEL V. MENDOZA,
RESPONDENT.

G.R No. 238513 -


SPOUSES BELINDA LIU
AND HSI PIN LIU,
PETITIONERS, v.
MARCELINA ESPINOSA,
MARY ANN M.
ESTRADA, ARCHIE
ASUMBRADO, INESITA
ASUMBRADO, LORETO
TUTOR, ELIAS PENAS,
BENITA ABANTAO,
BASILIZA MARTIZANO,
ARMAN PARAS,
MIGUELITO M.
ANTEGA, JOVENTINO
CAHULOGAN, AND
TITO TUBAC,
RESPONDENTS.

G.R. No. 240475 -


JONATHAN DE GUZMAN
Y AGUILAR,
PETITIONER, v. PEOPLE
OF THE PHILIPPINES,
RESPONDENT.

A.M. No. P-19-3985


(Formerly OCA I.P.I.
No. 12-3839-P) -
PRECIOUSA CASTILLO-
MACAPUSO,
COMPLAINANT, v. ATTY.
NELSON B.
CASTILLEJOS, JR.,
OFFICE OF THE CLERK
OF COURT, REGIONAL
TRIAL COURT,
CAUAYAN, ISABELA,
RESPONDENT. [A.M.
No. P-19-3986
(Formerly OCA I.P.I.
No. 13-4199-P)]
ANONYMOUS,
COMPLAINANT, v.
PRECIOUSA C.
MACAPUSO, SOCIAL
WELFARE OFFICER II,
OFFICE OF THE CLERK
OF COURT, REGIONAL
TRIAL COURT, MAKATI
CITY, RESPONDENT.

G.R. No. 239331 -


PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES,
PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v. EDSON BARBAC
RETADA ACCUSED-
APPELLANT.

G.R. No. 236496 -


F.F. CRUZ & CO., INC.,
PETITIONER, v. JOSE
B. GALANDEZ,
DOMINGO I. SAJUELA,
AND MARLON D.
NAMOC,
RESPONDENTS.

G.R. No. 238141 -


WILLIAM CRUZ Y
FERNANDEZ AND
VIRGILIO FERNANDEZ
Y TORRES,
PETITIONERS, v.
PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES,
RESPONDENT.

G.R. No. 230645 -


TONDO MEDICAL
CENTER,
REPRESENTED BY DR.
MARIA ISABELITA M.
ESTRELLA,
PETITIONER, v.
ROLANDO RANTE,
DOING BUSINESS
UNDER THE NAME AND
STYLE OF JADEROCK
BUILDERS,
RESPONDENT.

G.R. No. 240621 -


PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES,
PETITIONER, v. THE
HONORABLE
SANDIGANBAYAN
(SEVENTH DIVISION)
AND JAIME KISON
RECIO, RESPONDENTS.

G.R No. 241261 -


PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES,
PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v. ALBERT PEREZ
FLORES, ACCUSED-
APPELLANT.

G.R. No. 192366 -


BANK OF THE
PHILIPPINE ISLANDS,
PETITIONER, v.
GARCIA-LIPANA
COMMODITIES, INC.**
AND TLL REALTY AND
MANAGEMENT
CORPORATION,
RESPONDENTS.

G.R No. 223036 -


PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES, v. MIKE
OMAMOS Y PAJO,
ACCUSED-APPELLANT.

G.R. No. 209735 -


STANFILCO - A
DIVISION OF DOLE
PHILIPPINES, INC. AND
REYNALDO CASINO,
PETITIONERS, v. JOSE
TEQUILLO AND/OR
NATIONAL LABOR
RELATIONS
COMMISSION -
EIGHTH DIVISION,
RESPONDENTS.

G.R. No. 232675 -


MUNICIPALITY OF
DASMARI�AS,
PETITIONER, v. DR.
PAULO C. CAMPOS,
SUBSTITUTED BY HIS
CHILDREN JOSE PAULO
CAMPOS, PAULO
CAMPOS, JR., AND
ENRIQUE CAMPOS,
RESPONDENTS.[G.R.
No. 233078] NATIONAL
HOUSING AUTHORITY,
PETITIONER, v. DR.
PAULO C. CAMPOS,
SUBSTITUTED BY HIS
CHILDREN JOSE PAULO
CAMPOS, PAULO
CAMPOS, JR., AND
ENRIQUE CAMPOS,
RESPONDENTS.

G.R. No. 194403 -


SPOUSES HIPOLITO
DALEN, SR. AND FE G.
DALEN, EVERLISTA
LARIBA AND THE
MINOR BEVERLY T.
LARIBA, MAGDALENA F.
MARPAGA AND THE
MINORS MIKE
ANTHONY AND THOMIE
MAE, BOTH SURNAMED
MARPAGA, AGNES C.
MOLINA AND THE
MINORS SHEILA,
SIMOUN, STEPHEN
JOHN AND SHARON
ANN, ALL SURNAMED
MOLINA, EMMA C.
NAVARRO AND THE
MINORS RAYMOND,
MARAH, AND RYAN ALL
SURNAMED NAVARRO,
RUTH T. SULAM AND
THE MINOR JEINAR
REECE T. SULAM,
PETITIONERS, v.
MITSUI O.S.K. LINES
DIAMOND CAMELLA,
S.A., RESPONDENT.

G.R. No. 230778 -


PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES,
PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v. JUAN CREDO Y DE
VERGARA AND DANIEL
CREDO Y DE VERGARA
ACCUSED-
APPELLANTS.

G.R. No. 231007 -


PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES,
PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v. ANTONIO MARTIN Y
ISON, ACCUSED-
APPELLANT.

G.R. No. 229833 -


PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES,
PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v. WILLIAM CEPEDA Y
DULTRA* AND LOREN
DY Y SERO, ACCUSED,
LOREN DY Y SERO,
ACCUSED-APPELLANT.

G.R. No. 234446 -


VICTORIA
MANUFACTURING
CORPORATION
EMPLOYEES UNION,
PETITIONER, v.
VICTORIA
MANUFACTURING
CORPORATION,
RESPONDENT.

G.R. No. 218434 -


PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES,
PLAINTIFF-
APPELLEE,VS. PILAR
BURDEOS Y OROPA,
ACCUSED-APPELLANT.

G.R No. 241697 -


CITY OF DAVAO AND
BELLA LINDA N.
TANJILI, IN HER
OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS
CITY TREASURER OF
DAVAO CITY,
PETITIONERS, v.
RANDY ALLIED
VENTURES, INC.,
RESPONDENT.

G.R. No. 229037 -


PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES,
PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v. ELVIE BALTAZAR Y
CABARUBIAS A.K.A
"KAREN," ACCUSED-
APPELLANT.

G.R. No. 240254 -


RODESSA QUITEVIS
RODRIGUEZ,
PETITIONER, v.
SINTRON SYSTEMS,
INC. AND/OR JOSELITO
CAPAQUE,
RESPONDENTS.

G.R. No. 234429 -


SPOUSES FELIPE
PARINGIT AND JOSEFA
PARINGIT,
PETITIONERS, v.
MARCIANA PARINGIT
BAJIT, ADOLIO
PARINGIT,* AND
ROSARIO PARINGIT
ORDO�O,
RESPONDENTS.

G.R. No. 235739 -


EDWIN DEL ROSARIO,
PETITIONER, v. PEOPLE
OF THE PHILIPPINES,
RESPONDENT.

G.R. No. 241254 -


PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES,
PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v. ARMIE NARVAS Y
BOLASOC, ACCUSED-
APPELLANT.

A.M. No. 17-12-02-


SC - RE:
CONSULTANCY
SERVICES OF HELEN P.
MACASAET

G.R. No. 229983 -


FARMER-
BENEFICIARIES
BELONGING TO THE
SAMAHANG
MAGBUBUKID NG
BAGUMBONG,
JALAJALA,[*] RIZAL,
[**] REPRESENTED BY
THEIR PRESIDENT,
TORIBIO M.
MALABANAN,
PETITIONERS, v. HEIRS
OF JULIANA
MARONILLA,
REPRESENTED BY
ATTY. RAMON M.
MARONILLA,
RESPONDENTS.

G.R. No. 225789 -


THE PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES
PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v. ALTANTOR DELA
TORRE Y CABALAR
ACCUSED-APPELLANT.

G.R. No. 216754 -


PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES,
PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v. HAVIB GALUKEN Y
SAAVEDRA, ACCUSED-
APPELLANT.
G.R. No. 242160 -
PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES
PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v. JAN JAN TAYAN Y
BALVIRAN AND AIZA
SAMPA Y OMAR,
ACCUSED, AIZA SAMPA
Y OMAR, ACCUSED-
APPELLANT.

G.R. No. 228739 -


ROSEMARIE ERIBAL
BOWDEN,
REPRESENTED BY
FLORENCIO C. ERIBAL,
SR., PETITIONER, v.
DONALD WILLIAM
ALFRED BOWDEN,
RESPONDENT.

G.R. No. 225190 -


EFREN J. JULLEZA,
PETITIONER, v.
ORIENT LINE
PHILIPPINES, INC.,
ORIENT NAVIGATION
CORPORATION AND
MACARIO DELA
PE�A,*
RESPONDENTS.

G.R. No. 224651 -


CIVIL SERVICE
COMMISSION AND THE
OFFICE OF THE
SOLICITOR GENERAL,
PETITIONERS, v.
EDGAR B. CATACUTAN,
RESPONDENT. [G.R.
No. 224656] EDGAR B.
CATACUTAN,
PETITIONER, v. CIVIL
SERVICE COMMISSION
AND THE OFFICE OF
THE SOLICITOR
GENERAL,
RESPONDENTS.

G.R. No. 202097 -


DEPARTMENT OF
EDUCATION,[1]
PETITIONER, v. RIZAL
TEACHERS KILUSANG
BAYAN FOR CREDIT,
INC., REPRESENTED BY
TOMAS L. ODULLO,
RESPONDENT.

G.R. No. 229339 -


GLOBE ASIATIQUE
REALTY HOLDINGS
CORPORATION,
PETITIONER, v. UNION
BANK OF THE
PHILIPPINES,
RESPONDENT.

G.R. No. 232006 -


IN RE: THE WRIT OF
HABEAS CORPUS FOR
MICHAEL LABRADOR
ABELLANA
(PETITIONER,
DETAINED AT THE NEW
BILIBID PRISONS,
MUNTINLUPA CITY), v.
HON. MEINRADO P.
PAREDES, IN HIS
CAPACITY AS
PRESIDING JUDGE,
REGIONAL TRIAL
COURT OF CEBU CITY
BRANCH 13, PEOPLE
OF THE PHILIPPINES,
S/SUPT BENJAMIN
DELOS SANTOS (RET.),
IN HIS CAPACITY AS
CHIEF OF BUREAU OF
CORRECTIONS,
RESPONDENTS.

A.M. No. P-10-2790


[Formerly A.M. No. 10-
3-55-RTC] - OFFICE OF
THE COURT
ADMINISTRATOR,
COMPLAINANT, v.
PEARL JOY D. ZORILLA,
CASH CLERK III,
OFFICE OF THE CLERK
OF COURT, REGIONAL
TRIAL COURT, DIGOS
CITY, DAVAO DEL SUR,
RESPONDENT.

G.R. No. 227482 -


JOAQUIN BERBANO,
TRINIDAD BERBANO,
AND MELCHOR
BERBANO,
PETITIONERS, v. HEIRS
OF ROMAN TAPULAO,
NAMELY: ALBERT D.
TAPULAO,* DANILO D.
TAPULAO,** MARIETA
TAPULAO-REYES,
LINDA TAPULAO-
RAMIREZ, AND
JOSEFINA TAPULAO-
DACANAY,
REPRESENTED BY
ATTORNEY-IN-FACT
JOSEFINA TAPULAO-
DACANAY,
RESPONDENTS.

G.R No. 226369 -


ISABELA-I ELECTRIC
COOP., INC.,
REPRESENTED BY ITS
GENERAL MANAGER,
ENGR. VIRGILIO L.
MONTANO,
PETITIONER, v.
VICENTE B. DEL
ROSARIO, JR.,
RESPONDENT.

G.R. No. 238334 -


THE PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES,
PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v. ROSELINE KASAN Y
ATILANO AND HENRY
LLACER Y JAO,
ACCUSED-
APPELLANTS.

A.C. No. 11830 -


SPOUSES NERIE S.
ASUNCION AND
CRISTITA B.
ASUNCION,
COMPLAINANTS, v.
ATTY. EDILBERTO P.
BASSIG, RESPONDENT.

G.R No. 196455 -


CENTENNIAL
TRANSMARINE INC.,
EDUARDO R. JABLA,
CENTENNIAL MARITIME
SERVICES & M/T
ACUSHNET,
PETITIONERS, v.
EMERITO E. SALES,
RESPONDENT.

G.R. Nos. 220526-


27 - PNOC
DEVELOPMENT AND
MANAGEMENT
CORPORATION (PDMC)
PETITIONER, v.
GLORIA V. GOMEZ,
RESPONDENT.

G.R No. 229928 -


THE PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES,
PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v. DEXTER ASPA
ALBINO @ TOYAY AND
JOHN DOES,
ACCUSED; DEXTER
ASPA ALBINO @ TOYAY,
ACCUSED-APPELLANT.

G.R. No. 228819 -


PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES,
PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v. JEFFREY SANTIAGO
Y MAGTULOY,
ACCUSED-APPELLANT.

A.M. No. P-19-3972


(Formerly OCA I.P.I.
No. 12 3971-P) - ATTY.
LEANIE GALVEZ-JISON,
COMPLAINANT, v. MAY
N. LASPI�AS[*] AND
MAE VERCILLE H.[**]
NALLOS,
RESPONDENTS.

G.R. No. 231875 -


PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES,
PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v. CORAZON
NAZARENO Y
FERNANDEZ @ "CORA"
AND JEFFERSON
NAZARENO Y
FERNANDEZ @ "TOTO,"
ACCUSED-
APPELLANTS.

G.R. Nos. 191611-


14 - LIBRADO M.
CABRERA AND FE M.
CABRERA,
PETITIONERS, v.
PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES,
RESPONDENT.

G.R. No. 226065 -


HEIRS OF SOLEDAD
ALIDO, PETITIONERS,
v. FLORA CAMPANO,
OR HER
REPRESENTATIVES
AND THE REGISTER OF
DEEDS, PROVINCE OF
ILOILO,
RESPONDENTS.

G.R. No. 237063 -


FRANCIVIEL* DERAMA
SESTOSO,
PETITIONER, v.
UNITED PHILIPPINE
LINES, INC., CARNIVAL
CRUISE LINES,
FERNANDINO T.
LISING,
RESPONDENTS.

G.R. No. 226907 -


GERARDO A.
ELISCUPIDEZ,
PETITIONER, v.
GLENDA C.
ELISCUPIDEZ,
RESPONDENT.

G.R. No. 223512 -


PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES,
PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v. ANTONIO
ALMOSARA,*
ACCUSED-APPELLANT.

G.R. No. 227195 -


PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES,
PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v. FABIAN MABALATO
@ "BOY," JULIO
CARTUCIANO AND
ALLAN CANATOY @
"ALLAN EDWARD,"
ACCUSED, ALLAN
CANATOY @ "ALLAN
EDWARD," ACCUSED-
APPELLANT.

G.R. No. 239635 -


THE PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES,
PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v. JOSE BENNY
VILLOJAN, JR. Y
BESMONTE ALIAS "JAY-
AR," ACCUSED-
APPELLANT.

G.R. No. 222916 -


HEIRS OF SPOUSES
GERVACIO A. RAMIREZ
AND MARTINA
CARBONEL,
REPRESENTED BY
CESAR S. RAMIREZ
AND ELMER R. ADUCA,
PETITIONERS, v. JOEY
ABON AND THE
REGISTER OF DEEDS
OF NUEVA VIZCAYA,
RESPONDENTS.

A.C. No. 9298


[formerly CBD Case
No. 12-3504] -
PRESIDING JUDGE
AIDA ESTRELLA
MACAPAGAL,
REGIONAL TRIAL
COURT, BR. 195,
PARA�AQUE CITY,
COMPLAINANT, v. ATTY.
WALTER T. YOUNG,
RESPONDENT.

G.R. No. 242852 -


CONSOLACION P.
CHAVEZ, CONNIE P.
CHAVEZ, CARLA
HORTENSIA C.
ADELANTAR, CARMELA
P. CHAVEZ, CRESENTE
P. CHAVEZ, JR., AND
CECILIA C. GIBE,
HEREIN REPRESENTED
BY HER ATTORNEY-IN-
FACT CARLA P.
CHAVEZ,*
PETITIONERS, v.
MAYBANK
PHILIPPINES, INC.,
RESPONDENT.

G.R. No. 205260 -


C/INSP. RUBEN
LIWANAG, SR. Y
SALVADOR,
PETITIONER, v. PEOPLE
OF THE PHILIPPINES,
RESPONDENT.

G.R. No. 212938 -


THE HEIRS OF
ALFREDO CULLADO,[*]
NAMELY LOLITA
CULLADO, DOMINADOR
CULLADO, ROMEO
CULLADO, NOEL
CULLADO, REBECCA
LAMBINICIO, MARY
JANE BAUTISTA AND
JIMMY CULLADO,
PETITIONERS, v.
DOMINIC V.
GUTIERREZ,
RESPONDENT.

G.R. No. 232863 -


GOVERNMENT SERVICE
INSURANCE SYSTEM,
PETITIONER, v.
MUNICIPAL AGRARIAN
REFORM OFFICER
ROMERICO DATOY,
RESPONDENT.

G.R. No. 212885 -


SPOUSES NOLASCO
FERNANDEZ AND
MARICRIS
FERNANDEZ,
PETITIONERS, v.
SMART
COMMUNICATIONS,
INC., RESPONDENT.

G.R. No. 221571 -


LAND BANK OF THE
PHILIPPINES
PETITIONER, v.
ORLANDO R. BALDOZA
AND HEIRS OF
SPOUSES JAIME R.
BALDOZA AND
VIOLETA BALDOZA,
NAMELY: VINCENT
BALDOZA, JUAN
BALDOZA, CATHERINE
BALDOZA, JOAN
BALDOZA* AND GIRLIE
BALDOZA,**
RESPONDENTS.

G.R No. 241834 -


FERNANDO B.
ARAMBULLO,[*]
PETITIONER, v. PEOPLE
OF THE PHILIPPINES,
RESPONDENT.

A.C. No. 8911 - IN


RE: ATTY. ROMULO P.
ATENCIA: REFERRAL
BY THE COURT OF
APPEALS OF A
LAWYER'S UNETHICAL
CONDUCT AS
INDICATED IN ITS
DECISION DATED
JANUARY 31, 2011 IN
CA-G.R. CR-HC NO.
03322 (PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES V.
AURORA TATAC, ET
AL.).

A.C. No. 7389 -


VANTAGE LIGHTING
PHILIPPINES, INC.,
JOHN PAUL
FAIRCLOUGH AND MA.
CECILIA G. ROQUE,
COMPLAINANTS, v.
ATTY. JOSE A. DI�O,
JR., RESPONDENT.
[A.C. No. 10596, July
2, 2019] ATTY. JOSE A.
DI�O, JR.,
COMPLAINANT, v.
ATTYS. PARIS G. REAL
AND SHERWIN G.
REAL, RESPONDENTS.

G.R. No. 239727 -


SPS. JULIAN BELVIS,
SR., AND CECILIA
BELVIS, SPS. JULIAN E.
BELVIS, JR., AND
JOCELYN BELVIS, SPS.
JULIAN E. BELVIS III
AND ELSA BELVIS, AND
JOUAN E. BELVIS,
PETITIONERS, v. SPS.
CONRADO V. EROLA
AND MARILYN EROLA,
AS REPRESENTED BY
MAUREEN* FRIAS,
RESPONDENTS.

G.R. No. 213156 -


MARIO C. TAN AND
ERLINDA S. TAN,
PETITIONERS, v.
UNITED COCONUT
PLANTERS BANK,
RESPONDENT.

G.R. No. 211044 -


JACQUES A.
DUPASQUIER AND
CARLOS S. RUFINO
FOR THEMSELVES AND
ON BEHALF OF THE
NET GROUP,
COMPOSED OF 19-1
REALTY CORPORATION,
18-2 PROPERTY
HOLDINGS, INC., 6-3
PROPERTY HOLDINGS
INC., ADD LAND, INC.,
REMEDIOS A.
DUPASQUIER, PIERRE
DUPASQUIER, ANNA
MARIE
MORRONGIELLO,
DELRUF REALTY &
DEVELOPMENT, INC.,
VAR BUILDINGS, INC.,
MARILEX REALTY,
ARESAR REALTY,
SUNVAR, INC.,
MACARIO S. RUFINO,
REMIGIO TAN, JR., MA.
AUXILIO R. PRIETO,
MA. PAZ R. TANJANCO,
RAMON D. RUFINO,
PAOLO R. PRIETO,
VICENTE L. RUFINO,
THERESA P. VALDES,
ALEXANDRA P.
ROMUALDEZ, TERESA
R. TAN, JAVIER
VICENTE RUFINO,
CARLO D. RUFINO,
LUIS CARLO R.
LAUREL, MA.
ASUNCION L. UICHICO,
MA. PAZ FARAH L.
IMPERIAL, MA. ISABEL
L. BARANDIARAN,
ALFREDO PARUNGAO,
AND ALOYSIUS B.
COLAYCO,
PETITIONERS, v.
ASCENDAS
(PHILIPPINES)
CORPORATION,
RESPONDENT.

G.R. No. 223318 -


CESAR V. PURISIMA, IN
HIS CAPACITY AS
SECRETARY OF THE
DEPARTMENT OF
FINANCE AND
EMMANUEL F. DOOC,
IN HIS CAPACITY AS
INSURANCE
COMMISSIONER,
PETITIONERS, v.
SECURITY PACIFIC
ASSURANCE
CORPORATION,
VISAYAN SURETY &
INSURANCE
CORPORATION,
FINMAN GENERAL
ASSURANCE
CORPORATION,
MILESTONE GUARANTY
& ASSURANCE
CORPORATION, R&B
INSURANCE
CORPORATION,
INDUSTRIAL
INSURANCE COMPANY
INCORPORATED,
PHILIPPINE PHOENIX
SURETY & INSURANCE
INCORPORATED,
MERCANTILE
INSURANCE COMPANY
INCORPORATED,
GREAT DOMESTIC
INSURANCE COMPANY
OF THE PHILIPPINES,
INCORPORATED, AND
INSURANCE OF THE
PHILIPPINE ISLANDS
COMPANY
INCORPORATED,
RESPONDENTS.

G.R No. 239416 -


MELCHOR J. CHIPOCO,
CHRISTY C.
BUGANUTAN, CERIACO
P. SABIJON, THELMA F.
ANTOQUE, GLENDA G.
ESLABON, AND AIDA P.
VILLAMIL,
PETITIONERS, v. THE
HONORABLE OFFICE
OF THE OMBUDSMAN,
REPRESENTED BY
HONORABLE
CONCHITA CARPIO-
MORALES, IN HER
OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS
TANODBAYAN,
HONORABLE RODOLFO
M. ELMAN, IN HIS
OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS
DEPUTY OMBUDSMAN
FOR MINDANAO,
HONORABLE HILDE C.
DELA CRUZ-LIKIT, IN
HER OFFICIAL
CAPACITIES AS GRAFT
INVESTIGATION AND
PROSECUTION
OFFICER III AND
OFFICER-IN-CHARGE,
EVALUATION AND
INVESTIGATION
BUREAU-A, OFFICE OF
THE OMBUDSMAN-
MINDANAO, AND
HONORABLE JAY M.
VISTO, IN HIS
OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS
GRAFT INVESTIGATION
AND PROSECUTION
OFFICER II, AND
ROBERTO R. GALON,
RESPONDENTS.

G.R. No. 209274 -


THE HONORABLE
OFFICE OF THE
OMBUDSMAN,
PETITIONER, v.
ANGELINE A. ROJAS,
RESPONDENT.; G.R.
NOS. 209296-97 -
JOSE PEPITO M.
AMORES, M.D.,
PETITIONER, v.
ANGELINE A. ROJAS
AND ALBILIO C. CANO,
RESPONDENTS.

G.R. No. 237246 -


HAYDEN KHO, SR.,
PETITIONER, v.
DOLORES G.
MAGBANUA, MARILYN
S. MERCADO,
ARCHIMEDES B.
CALUB, MARIA E.
ONGOTAN, FRANCISCO
J. DUQUE, MERLE G.
RIVERA, DOLORES A.
PULIDO, PAULINO R.
BALANGATAN, JR.,
ANAFEL L.
ESCROPOLO, PERCIVAL
A. DEINLA, JERRY C.
ZABALA, ROGELIO C.
ONGONION, JR.,
HELEN B. DELA CRUZ,
CENON JARDIN, AND
ROVILLA L. CATALAN,
RESPONDENTS.

G.R. No. 219772 -


OFFICE OF THE
OMBUDSMAN,
PETITIONER, v.
P/SUPT. CRISOSTOMO
P. MENDOZA,
RESPONDENT.

G.R. No. 193136 -


ABS-CBN
BROADCASTING
CORPORATION,
PETITIONER, v.
HONORATO C.
HILARIO,
SUBSTITUTED BY
GLORIA Z. HILARIO,
AND DINDO B.
BANTING,
RESPONDENTS.

A.C. No. 4178 -


PEDRO LUKANG,
COMPLAINANT, v. ATTY.
FRANCISCO R.
LLAMAS, RESPONDENT.

G.R No. 231839 -


PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES,
PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v. MICHAEL RYAN
ARELLANO Y NAVARRO,
ACCUSED-APPELLANT.

G.R. No. 241946 -


PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES,
PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v. ELEVER JAEN Y
MORANTE, ACCUSED-
APPELLANT.

G.R. Nos. 238579-


80 - WILFREDO M.
BAUTISTA, GERRY C.
MAMIGO, AND
ROWENA C. MANILA-
TERCERO,
PETITIONERS, v. THE
HONORABLE
SANDIGANBAYAN,
SIXTH DIVISION, AND
THE OFFICE OF THE
OMBUDSMAN,
RESPONDENTS

G.R. NO. 218126 -


THE PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES,
PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v. DANILO GARCIA
MIRANDA, ACCUSED-
APPELLANT

G.R. No. 242947 -


PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES,
PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v. MARIO MANABAT Y
DUMAGAY, ACCUSED-
APPELLANT

G.R. No. 238453 -


PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES,
PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v. JAIME SISON,
LEONARDO YANSON,
AND ROSALIE
BAUTISTA, ACCUSED;
LEONARDO YANSON,
ACCUSED-APPELLANT

G.R. No. 224301 -


PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES,
PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v. BERNIE RAGURO Y
BALINAS, JONATHAN
PEREZ Y DE MATEO,
ERIC RAGURO Y
BALINAS, ELMER DE
MAKILING, TEODULO
PANTI, JR., AND
LEVIE* DE MESA,
ACCUSED, BERNIE
RAGURO Y BALINAS,
JONATHAN PEREZ Y DE
MATEO, ERIC RAGURO
Y BALINAS, TEODULO
PANTI, JR., AND LEVIE
DE MESA, ACCUSED-
APPELLANTS

G.R. No. 212202 -


PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES,
PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v. DARREN OLIVEROS
Y CORPORAL,
ACCUSED-APPELLANT

G.R. No. 225640 -


PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES,
PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v. ANTHONY PALADA @
TON-TON, AND
JONALYN LOGROSA @
MISA, ET AL.,
ACCUSED. JOEL
ACQUIATAN @ "KAIN",
ACCUSED-APPELLANT

G.R. No. 225586 -


THE PENINSULA
MANILA AND SONJA
VODUSEK,
PETITIONERS, v.
EDWIN A. JARA,
RESPONDENT

G.R. No. 224597 -


THE PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES,
PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v. DANTE CUBAY Y
UGSALAN, ACCUSED-
APPELLANT

G.R. No. 216936 -


PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES,
PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v. ALVIN PAGAPULAAN*
A.K.A. ALVIE
PAGAPULAAN Y
DAGANG, JOSE
BATULAN Y
MACAJILOS, RENATO
FUENTES Y BANATE
AND JUNJUN FUENTES
Y BANATE, ACCUSED,
JOSE BATULAN Y
MACAJILOS, ACCUSED-
APPELLANT

A.C. No. 10461 -


DR. VIRGILIO RODIL,
COMPLAINANT, v. ATTY.
ANDREW C. CORRO,
SAMUEL ANCHETA, JR.
AND IMELDA
POSADAS,
RESPONDENTS.

G.R. No. 218803 -


PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES,
PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE,
v. JACK MUHAMMAD Y
GUSTAHAM, A.K.A.
"DANNY ANJAM Y
GUSTAHAM," A.K.A.
"KUYA DANNY,"
ACCUSED-APPELLANT.
Copyright © 1998 - 2023 Disclaimer | E-mail Restrictions | ReDiaz
ChanRobles™ | Virtual Law Library™ | chanrobles.com™

You might also like