See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/333559440

Forensic Odontology

Book · January 2019

CITATIONS READS

0 1,929

2 authors, including:

Faraz Mohammed
College of Dentistry, University of Dammam
30 PUBLICATIONS 81 CITATIONS

SEE PROFILE

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

Stem cell research at Yenepoya Dental College Mangalore View project

Oral Submucous Fibrosis at Yenepoya Dental College, Mangalore, India View project

All content following this page was uploaded by Faraz Mohammed on 30 September 2019.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

30/09/2019 Forensic Odontology - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf

NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2019 Jan-.

Forensic Odontology
Authors

Faraz Mohammed1; Arishiya T. Fairozekhan2; Subraya Bhat3; Ritesh G. Menezes4.

Affiliations
1 College of Dentistry, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
2 College of Dentistry, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
3 Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University
4 College of Medicine, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia

Last Update: September 10, 2019.

Introduction
Forensic odontology is a significant outgrowth of forensic medicinal sciences and, in the felicity of justice, pacts with
the apt examination, handling and demonstration of dental evidence in the court of law.[1] It plays a pivotal role in
identifying the human remains of victims, not only those of mutilated, burnt and decomposed but also victims of
bioterrorism and mass disasters. Catastrophic events have also underlined the importance of forensic odontologists in
the identification of victims from industrial blows, airline accidents, natural disasters, and terrorist attacks including
that of explosive, chemical, radiological or nuclear, and may occur as a solitary catastrophe or sweeping event.
Forensic odontology plays a crucial role in circumstances where habitual methods of identification, such as
fingerprinting and visual recognition, cannot be performed, in cases of decomposed, charred or skeletonized bodies.
Dental professionals are called upon to assist in the event of a major disaster, including diagnosis and monitoring,
referral, decontamination, infection control, surveillance and notification, immunizations, medications, triage, and
medical care augmentation.[2]

The fundamental principles underlying dental identification have their basis on comparison and exclusion. The
comparison between antemortem and post-mortem information will be effective as long as the dental consultant has
completed the data collected during the patient’s life in an accurate, rational and as comprehensive as possible.

Issues of Concern
Responsibilities of forensic odontologist include[3]:

Identification of human remains

Age estimation

Identification following mass fatalities

Assessing bite mark injuries

Assessment abuse cases (child, spousal, elder)

Civil cases involving malpractice

Clinical Significance
Identification of Human Remains

Every human on earth has an identity in life; empathetic societies require that this identity is acknowledged even after
death. Once a person departs from this world, there may be many concerns, such as monetary dealings and family
relationships, which require attention. Humanitarian causes for human identification include[4]:

Need for authorities to return the appropriate body to the next of the family

The need for people to know with certainty the fate of a family member

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK540984/?report=printable 1/8
30/09/2019 Forensic Odontology - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf

The need for people to understand the circumstances surrounding the death of a member of the family and mark
with a suitable ceremony at the end of a person's life

Forensic odontology demonstrates a central role by presenting the pieces of evidence from the oral and maxillofacial
region (including the teeth), which will be used in a jurisdictional setting and acknowledged by the court of law and
the general scientific community to affirmatively and rightly separate truth from untruth. Forensic identifications in
general, by their nature, are multifaceted team exertions that characteristically embroil the mutual coordination of law
execution bureaucrats, forensic sciences experts such as forensic odontologists, anthropologists, pathologists,
serologists, criminalists and other consultants as deemed essential.

Dental identification of human being ensues at different causes and circumstances. The victims of death in violent
crimes, motor vehicle accidents, workplace accidents, fires, etc. can be mutilated to a great extent, so that family
member identification is not reliable or desirable.

Individuals who have long since deceased before detection and those found immersed in water are also visually
challenging to identify. Proof of identity through dental structures has long been of key importance in natural and
man-made disasters and in particular, mass fatalities usually related to aviation catastrophes. Dental identification
remains vitally important because of the lack of an extensive database for fingerprints.[5]

Age Determination Based on Dental Data

Age assessment is a sub-discipline of the forensic sciences and is a necessary measure of the identification practice,
principally when evidence concerning to the deceased is unreachable. A small variation in tooth development and
eruption among individuals has made the dental estimation of chronological age, a crucial technique of age
determination. Human dentition follows an unswerving and anticipated developmental sequence, beginning about
four months after conception and continue until the mid-third decade of life when the development of all the
permanent dentition is complete.[6]

Age determination is also formulated based on the degree of formation of crown and root structures, the stage of
eruption, and the intermixture of primary and adult dentitions. It also helps in identification if an individual is having
a comprehensive dental record and presence of any uniqueness like decay, malposition, overlapping, rotations, and
restorations/fillings with different materials, diastema/gaps and dentures/Implants, etc.

Teeth are well known as the strongest structure of the entire human body and are thus extremely durable and
identically resistant to external impacts like putrefaction, fire, explosions, and chemicals, etc., which brand them
accessible for a broad post-mortem duration. Age can be assessed from the teeth by several techniques like the
eruption of teeth, which is acknowledged as a good indicator of the age of the person. Other changes, which are
noticeable with increasing age, are attrition, periodontal disease, secondary dentine formation, and root translucency,
resorption of roots, root roughness, apposition of cementum, color change in the crown and the roots.

By analysis, the tooth development in a child and consequently comparing with developmental tables/charts can give
an age estimation in the pediatric group, (including fetuses and neonates). Conclusions are generally accurate to
around plus or minus 1.5 years. Graphic charts like those established by Ubelaker elucidate the dentition growth from
five months in-utero to 35 years after birth, exemplifying all the stages of dentitions. Some odontologists promote the
application of aspartic acid racemization and claim plus or minus four years of accuracy.[7]

In the year, 1947 a technique was developed based on structural tooth changes by Gustafson.[8] According to his
technique, there are six criteria. Those include attrition, amount of recession in gingiva, secondary dentin formation,
apposition of cementum, resorption, and transparency of root. These alterations were itemized with a predetermined
score ranging from zero (0) to three (3), and an equation put together for linear regression aimed at calculating the age
of an individual. The relationship constant achieved was 0.98. This technique is considered as the standard for human
age estimation and is being used ever since its development. The core shortcoming of Gustafson method was the
setting of equality for all the standards for equivalency.

Kashyap revised the Gustafson system using objective dimensions, removing the measures like the recession of
gingiva and resorption of the root. He defined the age of a person by gauging the secondary dentin by its length which
is the development of the pulp chamber and further accessing the root for the thickness of cementum formed.[9]

Additionally, advanced methods were developed, which include the practice of using scanning electron microscopes
and energy dispersive X-ray analysis (SEM-EDXA), an advanced technique to scan dentin for age estimation.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK540984/?report=printable 2/8
30/09/2019 Forensic Odontology - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf

Contemporary research from the United Kingdom observed the root length usage in estimating the age of a pediatric
individual. Another method developed is known as the Average stage of attrition (ASA) method which is a clinical
way of measuring the attrition of molar cusps; it measures the attrition of respective molar cusps and subsequently
uses them in average calculations.[10]

Socio-Economic Status

Dental restorations may indicate the economic, regional, and racial background of an individual. Restoration methods
used in some countries or regions may be rare or not used in other areas. A costly restoration can indicate a person's
economic status. The wear and stain patterns can suggest work or personal habits like smoking.[11]

Sex/gender identification

Many a times identification of sex/gender using skeletal remains, presents a problem for forensic professionals,
particularly when merely fragments of the body are recovered in the cases of ethnic studies, biochemical and nuclear-
powered bomb blasts, mishaps, and natural catastrophe investigations. Forensic odontologist can contribute to the
field through the help of other experts to conclude the gender of the remains using teeth and skull characteristics.
Different topographies of teeth like crown size, shape and root length, etc. are physiognomies for different genders.
There are also differences in skull patterns and qualities in different genders. These are of added advantages for
forensic odontologists in identifying the genders of the deceased bodies. The presence or non - compliance of Y -
chromatin and deoxyribose nucleic acid (DNA) analysis can confirm sexual identity by microscopic examination of
teeth.[12]

Race identification

There have been attempts to determine to what extent the tooth crown morphology can be used to determine
expectable forms of biological relationships among humans. Initially, anthropologists and odontologists in France and
Germany showed that certain morphological variants, like the number of cuspids of molars, differed between the main
human races. Our global population is traditionally riven into three different categories, Caucasus, Mongolian and
Negroid, by physical anthropologists.[13]

Caucasoid: The Caucasoid dental complex includes:

The absenteeism of shovel-shaped incisors

High incidence of bilateral counter winging or straight axial orientation of the central incisors

The absence of premolar occlusal tubercles (enamel pearls)

High incidence of the cusp of Carabelli

The absence of expressions of the protostylid of the sixth cusp and the seventh cusp

Mongoloid: Mongoloid dental complex includes:

High incidence of shovel-shaped incisors

Enamel pearls occur more commonly on the premolars

Cusp of Carabelli or tubercle commonly presents in the negative form with pits and grooves

Facial Reconstruction and Facial Superimposition

If the post-mortem data does not produce the distinctiveness of the dead person, it will be obligatory to recreate the
person's external appearance during life, especially the facial profile; this is the forensic artist's obligation to use the
dental profile to reconstruct the face. The use of ante-mortem pictures/photos to document facial superimposition of
skeletal and dental fractures have been useful in identifying missing individuals. This procedure necessitates the
readiness of appropriate ante-mortem pictures/photos displaying the teeth. Frequently, angulations and magnification
enforce hitches in positioning and arranging the images.[14]

Other methods of dental identification

The above two processes, comparative identifying and postmortem profiling, are the most common dental identifying
methods. Additional new and innovative techniques are, however, necessary in some instances. Most frequently, the
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK540984/?report=printable 3/8
30/09/2019 Forensic Odontology - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf

dental prosthesis has a label with the patient’s name or unique identification numbers or even the latest bar-coding and
QR coding systems.

Also, unlabeled dentures recovered from patients can be fit to casts made and retained by the treating dentist or
laboratory, which helps in the comparison. For identification purposes, other dental devices, like removable
orthodontic braces are also useful.

Rugoscopy/ Palatoscopy

In forensic odontological identifications, the stomatognathic system plays a very significant role due to the immutable
anatomy of the teeth, jaws and associated soft tissues. In certain conditions, if teeth are missing due to any reason,
then the habit of using the palatine rugae has been advocated as an alternate technique for identification. Palatoscopy
or palatal rugoscopy is the name given to define an identity of the person through the study of palatal rugae. Palatal
rugae start developing in the 3 months of intra-uterine life from the calcified mesenchymal tissue wrapping the bone.
The exact arrangement, configuration, and orientation takes place by approximately 12 to 14 weeks of prenatal life
and remains robust until the oral-mucosal structures regress after the demise of the person. The palatal rugae display
distinctive features that can be used in conditions when it is challenging to recognize a deceased person through
fingerprints and dental hard tissue records.[15]

Rugae are protected against trauma by their inner position in the head and by the tongue and buccal pad of fat from
heat. Research shows that no two individual’s palates are identical in their formation, arrangement, and alignment and
that the palate-print does not alter during growth; it remains unwavering and in one position throughout life. Hence,
this method is regarded as an alternative means for human identification.

Lip prints (Cheiloscopy)

The wrinkles and grooves in the labial mucous membrane (sulci labiorum) form a distinctive pattern, known as "lip
prints," and this study is known as cheiloscopy. There are many elevations and depressions on the external lip surface.
These are unique to individuals like fingerprints. A lip print demonstrates a surface with visible elements of furrow
lines. This feature helps to identify an individual's gender.[12]

DNA in Forensic Odontology

The dental tissues are an excellent source of DNA because of their resistance against environmental attacks such as
incineration, immersion, trauma, and decomposition. This biological material may provide the necessary link to
demonstrate identity when conventional methods of dental identification fail. This evidence source is becoming
increasingly popular among researchers with the advance of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR), a technique that
enables DNA amplification at a preselected location. The antemortem specimen from any DNA source, including
toothbrush and hairbrush or blood samples, biopsy, clothing or another individual item that has belonged to the
deceived, is here matched with the DNA extracted from a human remains at disaster sites.[16]

If the genomic DNA is not concentrated enough for conclusive identification, then mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA)
exists in a high number of copies in every cell and is very useful. The study of mtDNA is a powerful tool in forensic
cases if the maternal form of mtDNA that matches with parents and siblings of the deceased and there is no
antemortem comparison sampling.

Dentinal fluids contain species-specific antisera information, which is capable of assisting in identifying and
differentiating the remains of human beings from non-humans for as long as 12 months after the death of the victim.
When the only cellular residue is recouped from bone or teeth fragments, it may be possible to establish the gender of
an individual by the presence or absence of BARR bodies or sex chromosomes.[17]

Bite Mark

The pattern in a bite mark is unique, like fingerprints, radiographs, and DNA. Teeth are often used as a weapon in
mortal combat circumstances such as life and death struggles between attackers and victim. The teeth may be the only
defensive method available for a victim to inflict serious harm on an attacker. The pattern of bite-mark can be present,
depending on the circumstances, in foodstuffs, other objects, or on an attack or homicide victim itself. It is also well
known that sexual assailants, including sexual assassination, rape, and child sex abuse, often bite their victims to
express domination, fury, and animalized conduct. The teeth are an essential part of our natural arsenal. When violent
abuse involves the use of teeth as a weapon, the morphological and anatomical features of bite marks may be useful to
identify the victim. Comparisons of bite-marks include dental arch size and shape, tooth positions and individual
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK540984/?report=printable 4/8
30/09/2019 Forensic Odontology - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf

dental characteristics. The sizes, shapes, and patterns in the upper and lower dental arches and the biting edges of the
anterior teeth are considered unique to that individual. The main reason for this is the sequence of anterior and
posterior teeth eruptions. The resulting dental configuration creates a pattern that is identifiable compared to similar
patterns in bitten objects, which determines the likelihood of a particular person leaving their "calling card." These
include human skin, clothing, envelopes, gum, telephone receivers, and food. Human bite-marks are most common in
the victim's skin and may be present nearly every part of the human body. In sexual attacks, women are bitten in their
breasts and legs, whereas bites on their arms and shoulders are most common in males. Arms and hands often receive
bites when the arms are held up to prevent an assaulter from attacking as a defensive mechanism.[18]

Teeth injuries can range from bruises to scrapes and cuts or lacerations. It is certainly possible to produce enough
force to allow the biting edges of the teeth to penetrate the deep skin layers. When a lot of time from injury to
discovery elapses, the diffuse nature of the contusions and changes associated with injuries may further reduce the
evidence; this is especially true in the case of living bite victims but also for the deceased.[19]

Non-human bite injuries can sometimes present on victims. The differences in aligning and the specific morphology
of the teeth commonly distinguish animal bites from human bite lesions. Animal bites often lead to skin laceration,
shear injuries and open wounds, instead of impact injuries. Dog bites characteristically demonstrate a narrow anterior
dental arch and consist of deep tooth wounds over a small area, and perhaps it is the most common nonhuman bite.
During violent biting, a dog (or other carnivorous mammals) is more likely than a human to cause human tissue
avulsion. Cat bites are small and round with sharp cuspid-tooth impressions resulting from the teeth’s conical shape.

Documentation of bite mark evidence

As the physical and biological evidence from the bite mark soon deteriorates, photographs provide the most reliable
information, preservation, and require careful documentation. Photographs may be in black and white or color, with
dimensions included in the pictures/photos. Other methods of documentation include the collection of saliva washings
and suitable impressions.[20]

More than 80% of the global population secrete certain specific ABO antigens in their saliva. The cellular contents of
saliva have proven to be an appropriate source of genomic DNA, which can be an excellent aid to identify suspected
abusers. The double swab technology is used as a protocol for the collection of saliva samples. First, the surface
contacts of the tongue and lips are washed using light pressures and circular movements by a cotton swab moistened
with distilled water. Then, the remaining moisture left on the skin by the first swab is collected with a second dry
swab. At room temperature, both swabs are thoroughly air-dried for at least 45 minutes before release for testing by
legal authorities.

An additional technique for capturing bite mark evidence is the exact impression of the bitten surface to record any
teething irregularities, such as cuts, abrasions, etc. Polyether impression material, vinyl polysiloxane, is commonly
used to record impressions. The impression material can be rigidly supported with dental acrylic or plaster; this
permits accurate recording of the skin's curvature.

Forensic odontologists also use advanced techniques to improve photographic evidence. These advanced techniques
include electron microscopy scanning (SEM), videotape analysis, and enhancement of computerized images.[21]

Identification in mass disasters

Dental identification has always been of key importance in natural and man-made disasters and, in particular, in
aviation-related mass disasters. In a mass disaster situation, the identification process is the same as in routine dental
identification of a deceased, but the conditions under which the process is carried out are much more complicated.
The impact of mass fatality is a significant challenge for local governments. The infrastructural damage including
hospitals, transport, and communications hampers recovery is another great burdened challenge.[22]

Flaws in the standardization of dental records (which means there will be a great variety of details in antemortem and
postmortem documents), poor working conditions, psychological stress, decomposition, the maiming of human
remains at a disaster site, all complicate the identification processes. Disaster preparedness is the basic requirement
for the correct management of these situations. In those situations, a hierarchy of an antemortem, postmortem and
reconciliation teams must be established to identify the deceased victims. Team leaders must coordinate the work with
liaison officials. The results are communicated to the identification board headed by a commander; the operation
requires teamwork involving experts from different specialties. Only if well trained key experts with the selection of
the appropriate forensic diagnostic devices can disaster victim identification be successful. The forensic odontologist
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK540984/?report=printable 5/8
30/09/2019 Forensic Odontology - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf

has an active role in all phases of an identification process as a key member of the identification team. More
destruction, fragmentation, and mangling of human bodies than ever before may be part of catastrophe scenarios,
making it much more difficult to identify victims.[23]

The forensic odontologist is helped by knowledge of the site and equipment to perform procedures quickly. Pre-
planning of the facilities is obligatory. The field of operations and the magnitude of the catastrophic effect drives the
size and structure of the forensic dental team. Training and practice in different areas of forensic dental medicine at
various levels - administrative, technical, coordinating, etc. results in a polished group that has a high potential to
achieve successful results on an as need basis. These new challenges are met by forensic dentists who use modern
scientific methods to identify them. The key to successful disaster management is the planning, organization,
coordination and disaster response exercises. Forensic dentists have helped resolve many large-scale disasters. The
tsunami in 2004 in the Indian Ocean is probably the most prominent example of forensic dentists identifying
numerous victims. In Thailand, almost half of the victims were identified by dental methods alone.[22]

The organization of the identification center divides into subsections, which include forensic dentistry as a sub-
section. The section on forensic dentistry is further broken down into three sections and is led by a team leader
responsible for the operations of the identification center. The role of the forensic dentistry chief is the responsibility
of the whole section to manage, facilitate, coordinate and spokesperson. Each forensic dentistry subsection should
have a person designated to be responsible for that subsection's activities.

Domestic Violence and Child Abuse

The World Health Organization (WHO) has declared that violence is a significant and growing problem of public
health around the world. The main aim of this landmark declaration was for health workers to detect and manage
cases of violence, including abuse of vulnerable populations, i.e., children, the elderly, and women. Four different
forms of violence are also identified by the WHO: physical, sexual, psychological and neglect. In the orofacial region,
all sorts of violence and abuse can manifest, and therefore dentists should be concerned about this manifestation.
These manifestations include fracture of anterior teeth, fractured alveolar bone, lacerations of the labial and buccal
mucosa, lacerations to the frenum and bruises to the lips, face, and neck. Consequently, injuries to the oro-facial
region should give the treating dentist reasonable suspicion. The suspicion should lead to investigation and reporting,
but reporting should be well-considered.[24]

Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes

In identifying victims, the forensic odontologist plays a crucial role. General dentists should be aware of the use of
dental forensics. The unique characteristics of the teeth allow the forensic dentist to compare anti-mortem and post-
mortem dental registers and to conclude on the identification of the victim. Other important advances for the legal
authorities during the identification process might be the dental records which are used to offer patients the optimal
dental service. All dental therapies should, therefore, be properly registered and maintained. Dental doctors are at the
forefront of detecting signs of abuse in their patients, as are other healthcare workers. Bite marks are useful to identify
the abuse of children and offenders of various violence; however, caution is necessary when using only bite mark
proof. The criteria for abusive injury and reporting mechanisms should be understood to ensure that the concerned
authorities respond correctly. Forensic nurses, dentists, pathologists, and forensic pathologists should all be educated
in this area of medicine and work together for the preservation of evidence anti-mortem. [Level V]

Questions
To access free multiple choice questions on this topic, click here.

References
1. Krishan K, Kanchan T, Garg AK. Dental Evidence in Forensic Identification - An Overview, Methodology and
Present Status. Open Dent J. 2015;9:250-6. [PMC free article: PMC4541412] [PubMed: 26312096]
2. Bhoopathi V, Mashabi SO, Scott TE, Mascarenhas AK. Dental professionals' knowledge and perceived need for
education in bioterrorism preparedness. J Dent Educ. 2010 Dec;74(12):1319-26. [PubMed: 21123499]
3. Avon SL. Forensic odontology: the roles and responsibilities of the dentist. J Can Dent Assoc. 2004 Jul-
Aug;70(7):453-8. [PubMed: 15245686]
4. DEADMAN WJ. THE IDENTIFICATION OF HUMAN REMAINS. Can Med Assoc J. 1964 Oct 10;91:808-11.
[PMC free article: PMC1927673] [PubMed: 14199110]
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK540984/?report=printable 6/8
30/09/2019 Forensic Odontology - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf

5. Clark DH. An analysis of the value of forensic odontology in ten mass disasters. Int Dent J. 1994 Jun;44(3):241-50.
[PubMed: 7960163]
6. Asami R, Aboshi H, Iwawaki A, Ohtaka Y, Odaka K, Abe S, Saka H. Age estimation based on the volume change
in the maxillary premolar crown using micro CT. Leg Med (Tokyo). 2019 Mar;37:18-24. [PubMed: 30597413]
7. Bajpai M, Pardhe N, Kumar M, Agrawal S. A Comparative Evaluation of Gustafson's Formula and New Formula
for Age Estimation in India--A Forensic Study. Prague Med Rep. 2015;116(3):203-9. [PubMed: 26445391]
8. Adserias-Garriga J, Thomas C, Ubelaker DH, C Zapico S. When forensic odontology met biochemistry:
Multidisciplinary approach in forensic human identification. Arch. Oral Biol. 2018 Mar;87:7-14. [PubMed:
29241027]
9. Kashyap B, Anand S, Reddy S, Sahukar SB, Supriya N, Pasupuleti S. Comparison of the bite mark pattern and
intercanine distance between humans and dogs. J Forensic Dent Sci. 2015 Sep-Dec;7(3):175-9. [PMC free article:
PMC4714403] [PubMed: 26816456]
10. Ajmal M, Mody B, Kumar G. Age estimation using three established methods. A study on Indian population.
Forensic Sci. Int. 2001 Nov 01;122(2-3):150-4. [PubMed: 11672969]
11. Kruger MM, Martin LJ, Maistry S, Heathfield LJ. A systematic review exploring the relationship between
infection and sudden unexpected death between 2000 and 2016: A forensic perspective. Forensic Sci. Int. 2018
Aug;289:108-119. [PubMed: 29860163]
12. Nagare SP, Chaudhari RS, Birangane RS, Parkarwar PC. Sex determination in forensic identification, a review. J
Forensic Dent Sci. 2018 May-Aug;10(2):61-66. [PMC free article: PMC6344795] [PubMed: 30745778]
13. Someda H, Gakuhari T, Akai J, Araki Y, Kodera T, Tsumatori G, Kobayashi Y, Matsunaga S, Abe S, Hashimoto
M, Saito M, Yoneda M, Ishida H. Trial application of oxygen and carbon isotope analysis in tooth enamel for
identification of past-war victims for discriminating between Japanese and US soldiers. Forensic Sci. Int. 2016
Apr;261:166.e1-5. [PubMed: 26946933]
14. Zanatta A, Bezzi L, Carrara N, Moraes C, Thiene G, Zampieri F. New technique in facial reconstruction: the
case of Giovanni Battista Morgagni. Anthropol Anz. 2018 May 01;75(2):131-140. [PubMed: 29542801]
15. Sha SK, Rao BV, Rao MS, Kumari KVH, Chinna SK, Sahu D. Are Tooth Prints a Hard Tissue Equivalence of
Finger Print in Mass Disaster: A Rationalized Review. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2017 Nov;9(Suppl 1):S29-S33.
[PMC free article: PMC5731034] [PubMed: 29284931]
16. Pawar RK, More CB. Sex determination from tooth pulp deoxyribonucleic acid using polymerase chain reaction.
J Forensic Dent Sci. 2018 May-Aug;10(2):107-110. [PMC free article: PMC6344793] [PubMed: 30745788]
17. Kader F, Ghai M. DNA methylation and application in forensic sciences. Forensic Sci. Int. 2015 Apr;249:255-
65. [PubMed: 25732744]
18. Maji A, Khaitan T, Sinha R, Sarkar S, Verma P, Shukla AK. A Novel Computer-Assisted Method of Bite Mark
Analysis for Gender Determination. J Environ Public Health. 2018;2018:7130876. [PMC free article:
PMC6198570] [PubMed: 30402114]
19. Souviron R, Haller L. Bite mark evidence: bite mark analysis is not the same as bite mark comparison or
matching or identification. J Law Biosci. 2017 Dec;4(3):617-622. [PMC free article: PMC5965497] [PubMed:
29868189]
20. Saks MJ, Albright T, Bohan TL, Bierer BE, Bowers CM, Bush MA, Bush PJ, Casadevall A, Cole SA, Denton
MB, Diamond SS, Dioso-Villa R, Epstein J, Faigman D, Faigman L, Fienberg SE, Garrett BL, Giannelli PC,
Greely HT, Imwinkelried E, Jamieson A, Kafadar K, Kassirer JP, Koehler J', Korn D, Mnookin J, Morrison AB,
Murphy E, Peerwani N, Peterson JL, Risinger DM, Sensabaugh GF, Spiegelman C, Stern H, Thompson WC,
Wayman JL, Zabell S, Zumwalt RE. Forensic bitemark identification: weak foundations, exaggerated claims. J
Law Biosci. 2016 Dec;3(3):538-575. [PMC free article: PMC5570687] [PubMed: 28852538]
21. Divakar KP. Forensic Odontology: The New Dimension in Dental Analysis. Int J Biomed Sci. 2017 Mar;13(1):1-
5. [PMC free article: PMC5422639] [PubMed: 28533730]
22. Prajapati G, Sarode SC, Sarode GS, Shelke P, Awan KH, Patil S. Role of forensic odontology in the
identification of victims of major mass disasters across the world: A systematic review. PLoS ONE.
2018;13(6):e0199791. [PMC free article: PMC6023217] [PubMed: 29953497]
23. Dutta SR, Singh P, Passi D, Varghese D, Sharma S. The Role of Dentistry in Disaster Management and Victim
Identification: An Overview of Challenges in Indo-Nepal Scenario. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2016 Dec;15(4):442-
448. [PMC free article: PMC5083701] [PubMed: 27833335]
24. Hinchliffe J. Forensic odontology, part 5. Child abuse issues. Br Dent J. 2011 May 14;210(9):423-8. [PubMed:
21566612]

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK540984/?report=printable 7/8
View publication stats

30/09/2019 Forensic Odontology - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf

Figures

Identification center team in mass disasters. "Contributed by Dr. Faraz Mohammed, Oral and Maxillofacial
Pathologist, College of Dentistry, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, DAMMAM.

Copyright © 2019, StatPearls Publishing LLC.

This book is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/),
which permits use, duplication, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original
author(s) and the source, a link is provided to the Creative Commons license, and any changes made are indicated.

Bookshelf ID: NBK540984 PMID: 31082028

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK540984/?report=printable 8/8