Professional Documents
Culture Documents
net/publication/251993159
CITATIONS READS
2 209
2 authors, including:
Peter Weiß
Hochschule Pforzheim
101 PUBLICATIONS 256 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by Peter Weiß on 22 November 2016.
Introduction
The universal trend in the area of supplier relationship management goes towards the
process cost reduction and compliance. Nowadays, the interest of the organizations is to
build flexible electronic processes that support and customize their business processes, at
the same time that they are able to adapt the enterprise to the constant market changes.
Service procurement processes are still a source of high costs to companies, and due to its
complex and heterogeneous purchasing processes, few companies up to now have tried to
support those processes via the application of web-based information systems [3].
E-Procurement system or Desktop Purchasing System have as its main benefit the
process efficiency improvement through the redesign of the procurement processes as well
as the automation of the operative purchasing tasks, leaving time for buyers to focus on the
strategy purchase activities as the negotiation and management of long term contracts [3].
Orders carried out manually and individually, by circumventing the purchase department,
frequently cause wrong deliveries and delays. Furthermore, existing potential to save costs
are thrown away through inefficient processes caused through repetitive inquiries for
delivery conditions, quantities and prices, as well as individually build up stock reserves in
workplace or small storage [4]. Automation requires e-catalogues which support searching
and purchasing of services. In turn this necessitates standardized, interoperable descriptions
and specifications of service items. Today this is still an unsolved problem for industrial
services such as repair or maintenance services. Such complex services are offered and
delivered in facility-oriented and product-related service industries. Services of this type
have intangible and tangible elements and are typically exchanged in interactive purchasing
processes (mainly caused by personalization and configuration of offered and ordered
services) where buyers and sellers are closely integrated [16]. More recently, manufacturing
companies are starting to offer product-related services to their customers [2]. Purchasing
of services is typically categorized as indirect Maintenance, Repair and Operation (MRO)
E-Classification of Services
“Information systems have to put forward classification libraries and help tools to assist
users through the spend data classification process” [3]. Electronic catalogue systems tend
to support the product classification process. Buyers and suppliers can use an available
classification library in which the acquired knowledge base is stored and maintained [3].
Lee et al. [16] address the classification and strategic management of services in e-
commerce. The classification of services with a common coding scheme facilitates
commerce and procurement between buyers and sellers and is becoming mandatory in the
new era of electronic commerce. Classification codes can be involved in most e-
procurement transactions like searching of products and services in the internet, ordering
product and services directly from suppliers product e-catalogues, approval for purchases
before order is sent, given the standard coding match, receiving of goods, invoice
processing and payment transfer, use of trading partners as preferred suppliers and
document archiving which suppliers buyer’s will have access to [30]. Most classification
systems are based on a hierarchical structure of classes to describe product types or service
types. Attributes can be assigned to classes. The most know standard classification systems
are eCl@ss1, ETIM2, UNSPSC3, RosettaNet4, proficl@ss5, bau:class6, GPC7 and eOTD8. As
already highlighted, standardized product classification systems play a major role for
automated business transaction. Several attempts at classifying services have already made
by researchers: [25][26][27][28][14][29]. But the classification of industrial services has
not received the same level of attention as the categorization of consumer services.
[31] classify services into the service types professional service (highly customized,
process oriented transactions), mass service (product oriented transactions with little
contact and customization), service shops and service factory (Service oriented
manufacturing). The most popular architecture for such descriptive languages for products
and services is the combination of three components classes, attribute library and class-
specific attribute lists. Standardized product classification systems like eCl@ss play a
major role in business related communications between systems. They allow for the
unambiguous and context-free encoding of products and services. Especially catalog data
exchange and catalog data integration are in focus because of multiple sources of product
1
http://www.eclass.de
2
http://www.etim.org
3
http://www.unspsc.org
4
http://www.rosettanet.org
5
http://www.proficlass.de
6
http://www.baustoffkatalog.com
7
http://www. gs1.org/gdsn/gpc
8
http://www.
The previous data model of eCl@ss fits the description of simple and standardized
products. But for more complex, configurable products and services, it is reaching its limits.
Therefore a new data model will be introduced (see figure 1). The new data model is
oriented at the standards ISO 13584 [43] and IEC 61360 [44][45][46][47]. The most
important changes are new dynamic elements cardinality and polymorphism. The new data
model for the classification of products and services will be presented. There is a high
demand after harmonization of class structures and attribute lists of classes. The shown data
model allows the implementation of hierarchical attribute lists. Basic properties of all
corresponding classes should be considered as well as additional specific attribute
properties for specific classes. Furthermore, the data model supports an improved
application and integration of eCl@ss content class structure, buzzwords, attributes, values,
value list and attribute lists.
Since services have been mostly neglected in terms of classification, it was time for a new
approach for the classification of services.
As being involved in the classification process of services, we recommended to break
open the mixed structure of eCl@ss to eliminate the talking keys. The high demand of
services on the market and the advancing tertiarization implies the need of a clear service
structure for data exchange and service description. Therefore within the next upcoming
new releases of eCl@ss, new own segments for services will be introduced.
Service will get the same importance in terms of structural description as products
already have. Like products, eCl@ss will divide up services depending on their class of
business. We developed the first part of the classification of industrial services:
maintenance services. The new classification structure with an example of cardinality of
attribute blocks is presented in figure 2.
Segment :
Industrial MaintenanceServices 25- 00-00-00
Main Group :
...
Building 25-22-00-00 ...
Categorization Class
Group:
Doors and Portals 25-22-31-00 ...
... ...
...
Commodity Class : 25-22-31-01
Service
Attribute a Attribute a
Reference Attribute Reference Attribute
Attribute b Attribute b
Attribute 4 Attribute 4
Attribute c Attribute c
Aspect Administrative Aspect Administrative Aspect Technical Aspect Technical Aspect Comercial Aspekt Commercial
General Specific FACILITY MGMT General Specific VENTIL General Specific EXPORT
Characterization Class
Object ID Material ID
Supplier ID Supplier ID
Description
Short text
Long text
Figure 3: General and Specific Attribute Lists for Industrial Maintenance Services
Due to the dynamic data structure for the new data model and the new concepts of
polymorphism, cardinality and aspects, attributes can be individually applied to the
classified services. General attributes will be inherited by all classified elements, specific
attributes can be optionally applied.
References
[2] van der Valk, W.: Service procurement in manufacturing companies: Results of three embedded case
studies, Industrail Marketing Managemetn 37, p. 301-315, 2008
[3] Campelo Filho, Eulálio Gomes: Analysis of Current Supplier Relationship Management Practices: A
Solution Proposal. Dissertation. University of Karlsruhe. July 2009.
[4] Meier, A.; Stormer, H.: eBusiness & eCommerce: Managing the Digital Value Chain, Springer Verlag
Berlin, (2009).
[5] Fitzsimmons, J.A., Noh, J., & Thies, E. (1998). Purchasing business services. Journal of Business and
Industrial Marketing, 13 (4/5), 370-380.
[7] Stock, J.R., & Zinszer, P.H. (1987). The industrial purchase decision for professional services. Journal of
Business Research, 15, 1-16.
[8] eCl@ss (2009). ECl@ss: International Standard for the Classification and Description of Products and
Services; http://www.eclass.eu/, last visited 14 May 2009.
[9] Johansson, P., Olhager, J., Industrial service profiling: Matching service offerings and processes, Int. J.
Production Economics 89 (2004), 309-320.
[12] Meyer, A., Mattmüller, R. (1997) Qualität von Dienstleistungen. Entwurf eines praxiorientierten
Qualitätsmodells. In. Marketing ZFP 9 (3), S. 187-195.
[14] Kotler, P., Marketing Management. Analysis, Planning, Implementation and Control, 8th Edition.
Prentice-Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1994.
[15] Boyt, T., Harvey, M.. Classification for Industrial Services. A Model with Stategic Implications,
Industrial Marketing Management 26, 291-300 (1997).
[16] Lee, S.; Park, Y. (2008). The classification and strategic management of services in e-commerce:
Development of service taxonomy based on customer perception, Expert Systems with Applications 36
(2009), 9618-9624.
[25] Judd, R., A Case for Redefining Services. Journal of Marketing 28, 59-65 (1964).
[26] Rathmell, J.: Marketing in the Service Sector, Cambridge (MA), 1974.
[27] Shostack, G., Breaking Free From Product Marketing, in Services Marketing, Christopher H. Lovelook,
ed., Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1977, 37-47.
[28] Hill, T., on Goods and Services. Review of Income and Wealth 23, 315-338 (1977).
[29] Lovelock, C., toward a Classification of Services, In Theoretical Developments in Marketing, C. Lamb
and P. Dunn eds., American Marketing Association, Chicago, IL, 1980, pp. 72-76.
[30] Fairchild, A.; de Vuyst, B.: Coding Standards Benefiting product and Service Information in E-
commerce).
[31] Silvestrou, R., Fitzgerald, L, Johnston, R., Grant, C., 1992. Towards a classification of service processes.
Internal Journal of Service Industry Management 3 (3), 62-75.
[32] Baron, J.P., Shaw, M.J., Bailey, A.D., 2000. Web-based e-catalog systems in B2B procurement,
Communications of the ACM. Vo. 43, No. 5, 2000, pp. 93-100.
[44] IEC 61360-1:2002, Standard data element types with associated classification scheme for electric
components – Part 1: Definitions – Principles and methods, Norm, 2002.
[45] IEC 61360-2:2002, Standard data element types with associated classification scheme for electric
components - Part 2: EXPRESS dictionary schema, Norm, 2002.
[46] IEC 61360-4:1997, Standard data element types with associated classification scheme for electric
components – Part 4: IEC reference collection of standard data element types, component classes and
terms, Norm, 1997.
[47] IEC 61360-5:2004, Standard data element types with associated classification scheme for electric
components Part 5: Extensions to the EXPRESS dictionary schema, Norm, 2004.
[48] DIN 31051:2003-06: Fundamentals of Maintenance, DIN standard, 2003.
[49] DIN 13306: 2001-09: Maintenance terminology, DIN standard, 2001.
[50] L. Penin and C. Vezzoli (2005). Designing Sustainable Product-Service System for All. Milano: United
Nations Environment Programs.