Professional Documents
Culture Documents
By the end of July, responding to every British or French advance or attempt to advance, the
German infantry had made not less than sixty-seven counter attacks, large or small, that I can
identify. Probably they had made a great many more, now lost in time’s obscurity – possibly twice
as many. This was the texture of the battle: attack, counter-attack; attack again, counter-attack
again ... That is why it is so utterly pernicious to dwell constantly on the freak of 1 July, and to
associate the whole battle with the image of that day ... The Somme was the turning point.
John Terraine, The Smoke and the Fire: Myths and Anti-Myths of War, 1861–1945, 1980
SOURCE 13
The Somme offensive was a necessary if painful stage in the process of weakening a skilful,
courageous and highly professional enemy.
Peter Simkins, in Chris McCarthy, The Somme: The Day-By-Day Account, 1993, foreword
SOURCE 14
We may perhaps question whether the four-and-a-half month slog of the Somme was the
unmitigated disaster it is usually painted. One voice worth hearing in this context is that of
the German supreme commander Field Marshal Paul von Hindenburg, who was sufficiently
chastened by the sufferings of his troops during the campaign to state at a conference in January
1917, ‘We must save the men from a second Somme battle.’ Another notable viewpoint is that of
the distinguished soldier–writer Charles Carrington, who would later claim that ‘The Somme
battle raised the morale of the British Army. Although we did not win a decisive victory there was
what matters most, a definite and growing sense of superiority, man to man ... We were quite sure
we had got the Germans beat.’
M. Brown, ‘Sommewhere in France’, History Today, July 2006, Vol. 56, Issue 7, pp. 22–4