https://www.medscape.

com/viewarticle/978355_print

www.medscape.com

Omecamtiv Mecarbil Fails to Improve Exercise Capacity in HFrEF

Fran Lowry

August 01, 2022

Treatment with the novel agent omecamtiv mecarbil did not improve exercise capacity
in people with chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), in the
METEORIC-HF trial.

The double-blind, phase 3 study failed to achieve its primary endpoint of change in
peak oxygen uptake (VO2) after 20 weeks of treatment with omecamtiv mecarbil
compared with placebo.

There also was no benefit on secondary measures of total workload, ventilatory

efficiency, and daily physical activity, according to results presented earlier
this year at ACC 2022 and formally published this month in JAMA.

Dr Gregory D. Lewis

“These findings do not support the use of omecamtiv mecarbil for treatment of HFrEF
for improvement of exercise capacity,” lead author Gregory D. Lewis, MD,
Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, and colleagues conclude in the paper.

Researchers had hoped that the oral selective myosin activator would prove useful
in this subset of patients, having previously shown in the GALACTIC-HF trial to
provide a significant improvement in heart failure (HF) events and cardiovascular
death.

A prespecified subgroup analysis from that trial also found that HF patients with
the lowest ejection fraction derived the greatest relative benefit from omecamtiv
mecarbil.

“The lack of effect of omecamtiv mecarbil on exercise performance is inconsistent

with its known mechanism of action of directly enhancing ventricular performance
and reducing the risk of cardiovascular events,” Lewis and colleagues observe.

The drug’s novel mechanism of action, direct activation of myosin, contrasts with
that of currently available inotropic agents, such as dobutamine or milrinone. It
is not yet approved by the US Food & Drug Administration (FDA) but is scheduled for
an advisory committee meeting on December 13, 2022, and has been assigned a PDUFA
date of February 28, 2023.

METEORIC-HF randomly assigned 276 patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA)
class II or III symptoms and a left ventricular ejection fraction of 35% or less to
omecamtiv mecarbil (n = 185) or placebo (n = 91), given orally twice daily at a
dose of 25 mg, 37.5 mg, or 50 mg based on target plasma levels for 20 weeks, on top
of guideline-directed medical therapy.

The patients’ median age was 64 years and 15% were women. The median ejection
fraction was 28% and median baseline peak VO2 was 14.2 mL/kg/min in the omecamtiv
mecarbil group and 15.0 mL/kg/min in the control group.
At 20 weeks, the mean change in peak VO2 in the omecamtiv mecarbil group was -0.24
mL/kg/min and 0.21 mL/kg/min in the placebo group (95% CI, -1.02-0.13; P = .13).

For the secondary outcomes, the change in workload achieved on stress testing
declined in the omecamtiv mecarbil group (-3.8 vs 1.6). The drug had a neutral
effect on minute ventilation relative to carbon dioxide production throughout
exercise (0.28 vs -0.14 VE/VCO2 slope) and average total daily activity units,
measured over 2 weeks by accelerometer (-0.2 vs -0.5).

The authors suggest that “one possible explanation for discordance between clinical
events in a long-term follow-up study and exercise capacity improvement is that
cardiac performance was not exclusively responsible for limiting exercise capacity
in trial participants with HFrEF who were stable and very well treated with both
pharmacologic and device HFrEF therapy.”

In an accompanying editorial, Mark H. Drazner, MD, MSc, University of Texas

Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, writes that another possible explanation is
that participants in METEORIC-HF had less severe heart failure, compared with
participants in GALACTIC-HF, and so were less likely to benefit from omecamtiv
mecarbil.

METEORIC-HF excluded participants who had a HF hospitalization that required

intravenous diuretics in the preceding 3 months, whereas 25% of participants in
GALACTIC-HF were inpatients for decompensated HF and 36% had a HF hospitalization
within the preceding 3 months.

Another plausible explanation for the differing results is that a therapy that
improves long-term clinical outcomes may not improve exercise capacity, Drazner
writes. “The available data are persuasive to suggest this may be the case.”

Some pharmacologic therapies, such as flosequinan, improved exercise capacity in

patients with HF yet increased long-term mortality, he noted. Several medications
that have a class I recommendation in the 2022 Heart Failure Guideline for the
treatment of HFrEF also have not been shown to improve exercise capacity, as
measured by peak VO2 or by 6-minute walk distance.

In this context, Drazner said he doesn’t anticipate the METEORIC-HF findings to

derail FDA approval. However, should the drug be approved, clinicians will have
increasingly complex decisions to make about which therapies should be prescribed
to which patients.

“Some clinicians may contemplate using omecamtiv mecarbil either in the subgroup of
patients with very low ejection fractions or more severe disease, believing this
strategy will maximize the benefits of this therapy, but those approaches should be
pursued with caution given they are predicated on subgroup and post-hoc analyses,
respectively,” he wrote.

Drazner concludes that medications known to improve survival in patients with HFrEF
are used at “disappointingly low rates and suboptimal doses in the United States.
Implementation strategies to improve use of such therapies are needed, and those
efforts should be prioritized before adoption of therapies that reduce morbidity
but not cardiovascular mortality.

The study was sponsored by Amgen and Cytokinetics. Lewis reports financial
relationships with the National Institutes of Health, American Heart Association
(AHA), Amgen, Cytokinetics, Applied Therapeutics, AstraZeneca, SoniVie, Pfizer,
Merck, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, American Regent, Cyclerion, MyoKardia, Novo
Nordisk, and UpToDate. Drazner reports being a member of the writing committee of
the 2022 Heart Failure guidelines; and that he is supported by the James M. Wooten
Chair in Cardiology at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, which
was a clinical site in METEORIC-HF. However, Drazner was not a study investigator
in the trial.

JAMA. 2022;328:259-269, 249-250. Abstract, Editorial.

For more from theheart.org | Medscape Cardiology, follow us on Twitter and

Facebook.

Credits:
Lead image: Stevanovicigor/Dreamstime

Medscape Medical News © 2022

Cite this: Omecamtiv Mecarbil Fails to Improve Exercise Capacity in HFrEF -

Medscape - Aug 01, 2022.