Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Article
Consumer Behavior in the Service Industry: An Integrative
Literature Review and Research Agenda
Prakash Singh 1, * , Lokesh Arora 2 and Abdulaziz Choudhry 3
1 E-Commerce Department, College of Administrative and Financial Sciences, Saudi Electronic University,
Riyadh 11673, Saudi Arabia
2 Management Department, IIMS Pune, Pune 411033, India
3 Travel and Tourism Department, Faculty of Tourism, King AbdulAziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
* Correspondence: p.kishore@seu.edu.sa
Abstract: Ongoing technological disruptions in the service industries have altered modern business
practices globally. Due to the unending transference in the overall consumer behavior in online
and offline business environments, service providers are forced to rethink their existing business
strategies, to understand the disruptive behaviors of consumers and the factors responsible for this.
An integrative literature review (ILR) method has been employed to track the ongoing disruption
in consumer behaviors in diverse service industries. This study is an attempt to bridge the gap by
offering global insights related to the study of consumer behaviors in diverse service settings. The
Web of Science and Scopus electronic databases have been mined to extract the existing literary
works and 120 articles are selected as the final sample for this study through advanced inclusion
and exclusion criteria. The key findings of the study have been categorized using the TCM (Theory,
Context, and Methodology) framework as the future research agenda of this study. This study will
contribute to enhancing the understandings of marketers, researchers, and academics through the
massive collection of the existing literature in the research study of consumer behavior.
Keywords: consumer; consumer behavior; integrative literature review; research agenda; service industry
1. Introduction
Citation: Singh, P.; Arora, L.;
Choudhry, A. Consumer Behavior in “Consumer behavior is the study of how people buy, what they buy, when they buy,
the Service Industry: An Integrative and why they buy” [1]. Consumer behavior is vibrant and complex. Hence, it is challenging
Literature Review and Research for marketers to understand consumers’ behaviors that keep on changing, due to the diverse
Agenda. Sustainability 2023, 15, 250. landscape of the service sector and the variations in the service quality [2]. How customers
https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010250 choose their goods and services can be tremendously imperative for service providers, to
Academic Editor: Azilah Kasim
gain a competitive advantage over their rivals in the existing markets of the diverse service
industry. Consumers always prefer quality services that further play an important role in
Received: 10 November 2022 determining the success or failure of a service industry. The service providers’ survival
Revised: 29 November 2022 and performance in the service industry are dependent on meeting consumers’ service
Accepted: 8 December 2022 expectations related to the service providers’ performance, compared to other rivals in the
Published: 23 December 2022
service industry [3]. Service providers’ perceive performance as significantly influencing
the overall customers’ attitudes and word-of-mouth intentions [4]. Therefore, consumers’
responses about service providers’ products and brand performance are considered in
Copyright: © 2022 by the authors.
refining the existing marketing strategies of the key players of the service industry [5].
Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. Service providers ought to understand consumers’ buying behaviors, to offer better services
This article is an open access article and enrich consumer experiences, so that they can survive and sustain themselves in their
distributed under the terms and respective service industries, in the long run [6].
conditions of the Creative Commons In the service industry, the study of consumer behavior is needed to understand the
Attribution (CC BY) license (https:// changing consumer behavioral patterns, globally. Consumers’ behaviors of complaining are
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ apparently anticipated when the service delivered is displeasing, resulting in the diverse
4.0/). nature of service encountered by consumers. To sustain themselves in their respective
RQ2: To what extent do these factors affect the overall consumer behaviors in the
service industries?
RQ3: What are the key theories, contexts, and methodologies found in the extant
literature on consumer behaviors in the service industries?
To address the stated research questions for discovering a fresh viewpoint, the research
objectives are as specified:
1. To pinpoint the significant factors affecting the consumer behaviors in the service
industries by critically analyzing and reviewing the existing literature.
2. To offer acumen related to consumer behaviors in the service industries through the
extraction and review of selected articles, using the ILR method.
3. To identify the future directions of study by offering insights in the line of theory,
context, and methodology, through the formulation of a research agenda, for further
investigation.
To meet these stated research objectives, the ILR method will be used as this method
is proven to be a beneficial approach to understanding the key terminologies in consumer
behavior research. This will further assist future researchers in their future research en-
deavors by enlightening their overall knowledge of this domain of research. With the
application of ILR, this research study will offer a point of view that will be helpful in
business research-related studies. The ILR is the right approach that accords experimental
research and non-experimental research, through its amalgamation, delivering a remark-
able contribution to gathering relevant articles, as per the research theme. For the data
assortment advancements and the data extraction, in the ILR method-based research, new
strategies have been established. The present study has been outlined, as per the stated
sections: The first section is all about the need for the research, a brief introduction to
the research theme, and the purpose of the study. The second section outlines the re-
search approach used for searching the relevant articles. The literature and theory are
explained in the third section, which will offer the outline of this research study. The key
findings are discussed in the fourth section, discussing various notable explorations of the
studies. The fifth section provides future directions of the research, to assist academics
and researchers in their upcoming research studies. Finally, the sixth section outlines the
concluding observations of the study, followed by the references.
2. Research Approach
In this second section of the study, the research approach adopted and implemented
to search, select, and download the articles, per the research theme, is discussed. To achieve
the research study objectives, the relevant articles will be identified, and the selected articles
will be downloaded and analyzed. By employing the integrative literature review (ILR)
methodology, key theory, context, and methodology will be identified, to comprehend the
critical factors influencing consumer behavior in service settings. However, there are many
approaches to the literature review, such as theory-based reviews [18,19], theme-based
reviews [20,21], framework-based reviews [22,23], theory development reviews [24], hybrid
reviews [25], bibliometric analyses [26], and meta-analyses [27]. Moreover, a systematic
literature review (SLR) can be approached in a myriad of ways. For this study, an inte-
grative literature review [28] methodology is used as it is a multi-faceted type of review
approach and it predates other constant tracking and systematic approaches, and it is very
similar to that used in the SLR [29]. By using the ILR method, one explores the available
substantiation vis-à-vis a certain phenomenon, in a way that pinpoints the budding research
gaps that are requisite to be talked about in the consequent study. As an ILR encapsulates
numerous categories of substantiation with diverse approaches and offers a wider, more
comprehensive outlook of a theme, than the SLR approach [30] covering several research
questions or propositions [29]. In addition to this, the ILR methodology permits the re-
searcher to outshine the process of analyzing and synthesizing the key findings of the
primary studies [29] and documents the amalgamation of the qualitative and quantitative
data, thus permitting a comprehensive understanding of a specific phenomenon [30,31].
Sustainability 2023, 15, 250 4 of 30
Conversely, it is clear that the strength of an ILR methodology lies in summarizing the
key findings of the manifold types of substantiation, talking through a research problem
and could, consequently, be the desired type of review methodology to provide a more
comprehensive outlook of a theme enlightening the understandings [32]. Hence the ILR
methodology is the more adequate approach to reach the research goals of this study.
Figure 1. Flowchart
Figure of of
1. Flowchart thethe
study selection
study process,
selection to to
process, identify thethe
identify relevant articles.
relevant articles.
Table 2. List of journals used for the search and selection of articles using the Web of Science and
Table 2. List of journals used for the search and selection of articles using the Web of Science and
Scopus databases.
Scopus databases.
List of Journals Searched
List ofYear:
Journals Searched Articles Articles Articles
S. No. (Search Parameters Used: 2001 to 2020, Document Type- Articles Articles Articles
S. No. (Search Parameters Used: Year: 2001 to 2020, Document Type-Article, Found Identified Selected
Article, Category-Q1 Journals, Language-English, Area-Marketing) Found Identified Selected
Category-Q1 Journals, Language-English, Area-Marketing)
1 Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 11 5 3
1 Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 11 5 3
2 Journal of Marketing 54 3 3
2 Journal of Marketing 54 3 3
3 Journal of Interactive Marketing 36 2 0
4 3 Journalof
Journal ofMarketing
Interactive Marketing
Research 36
92 32 0 0
5 4 Journal of Marketing
Journal of RetailingResearch 92
162 13 1 0
6 5 JournalJournal
of Consumer Research
of Retailing 87
162 01 0 1
7 6 Journal
Journal of Advertising
of Consumer Research 18
87 20 0 0
8 7 International Journal
Journal of Advertisingin Marketing
of Research 25
18 02 0 0
9 Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 294 26 25
8 International Journal of Research in Marketing 25 0 0
10 Journal of International Marketing 245 1 1
9 Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 294 26 25
11 International Marketing Review 14 1 1
10 Journal of International Marketing 245 1 1
12 Marketing Science 106 1 0
13 11 International Marketing
International Journal Review
of Advertising 14
3 31 3 1
14 12 Journal of Marketing
MarketingScience
Management 106
153 11 0 0
13 International Journal of Advertising 3 3 3
14 Journal of Marketing Management 153 1 0
15 Journal of Public Policy and Marketing 2 0 0
16 Journal of Services Marketing 424 16 15
Sustainability 2023, 15, 250 6 of 30
Table 2. Cont.
Table 2. Cont.
The downloaded articles were analyzed to frame the overview of the study and find
the key factors affecting consumer behaviors in the service industry. For proposing further
research studies, the authors used the TCM (Theory (T), Context (C), and Methodology
(M)) framework [33]. This further investigation would assist researchers and marketers in
their future endeavors, in the context of the research theme.
The next section presents the literature and theory, based on the review of the extant
literature.
3.1. Overview
3.1.1. Customer Relationship Management
A UK-based research study identified privacy and confidentiality as significant chal-
lenges for maintaining a cordial relationship with customers. These challenges and vari-
ations on the consumer’s power characteristics could be further used to find a better
solution for building and managing the long-term relationship with new and existing
customers, which might act as a ladder to the future success of businesses [34]. The re-
searcher carried out his study by adopting attitude and knowledge as two parameters
for enhancing the customer relationship management (CRM) knowledge. A privacy grid
was developed that was later converted into four diverse forms of marketing strategies
and market circumstances. CRM practitioners would have better assistance from this grid,
to plan their roadmap for CRM. The types of facts distributed and remarkable advances
were observed as the direct assumptions of repurchase behaviors in CRM. Illustrations
based on the assumptions suggested that it collaborated with the system that positions the
repurchase behavior into a comprehensive and widespread structure, due to the flattened
classification [34]. Further, it had been identified that in the US and Germany, factors
were built on laddering dialogues. To evaluate the interrelation and connotation of drivers
over a public likelihood, test was administered to customers. The proposed framework’s
periphery settings that were accountable for diverse types of services were investigated,
Sustainability 2023, 15, 250 8 of 30
and the display of the diverse repurchase customers’ behaviors was uneven, in the service
sectors [35] Hence, there was a need for upgrading the knowledge for this. When a video is
created for marketing-related activities, significant variations in the video content influence
the developer, if the developer is a layman or expert; hence, it matters a lot to the study.
A study in the US was conducted to understand the degree of changes observed by the
impact of the video.
To summarize, it could be concluded that the skill set of the developer matters in
order to obtain better results. Principally, one video-sharing website, YouTube, acts as an
emerging media channel for drivers, such as developer attitudes towards video, behavioral
intention, and issue importance [35]. A public service announcement (PSA) video proved
very fruitful, due to the nature of the developer with relation to the multi-country contexts.
Human interactions with consumers had a long-lasting impact on the psychology of
consumers, as per a study conducted on the service channel [36]. These were the study’s
significant findings, which could help marketers, in the long run, to manage CRM efficiently.
In the context of the Italian retail sector backdrop, preceding studies could decisively signify
the best equilibrium of human and digital services. The study analyzed the challenges
faced by consumers during their contact with technically sound Italian retail companies’
in-store services. The service channels’ determinants that had driven the human and digital
touchpoints affirmed its crucial role in shaping the consumers’ preferences in the context
of alternatives for in-store retail settings. It further entailed a better understanding of the
disruptive transformation on retail by highlighting the innovative and game-changing
initiatives, and integrating machine and human touchpoints, to offer better services to
consumers [36]. Japan’s retail and services sectors examined that managing efficient
customer relationships had a great impression on the loyalty of customers, client retention,
employee convenience, and the effective implementation of client relations that are reliant
on the adoption of information technology [37]. Therefore, managing well-organized
client relations depended on adopting advanced technology and commitment, to deliver
efficient services. Moreover, managing relationships with customers is critical, and in
today’s scenario, return on value is influenced by CRM practices which need to be further
explored [37].
studies attempted to uncover the effect of the perceived service quality and perceived
usefulness on the ongoing intention and motivation for retailers to uncover the impact
of diverse customers’ outlooks regarding their service experiences and perceptions in the
retail perspective. Hence, consumer loyalty and consumer commitment in the service
sectors require further exploration [40].
product suggestions [48]. Ease of shopping and flexibility in using E-commerce platforms
was observed among Malaysian consumers who altered their buying decision-making
process. Satisfied customers shared better comments and positive feedback about their
overall purchase experiences, which further acted as a supporting tool for creating eWoM,
by advertising the E-commerce platforms digitally [49]. In the present scenario, the advent
of new technology and smartphones has turned into an advanced lifestyle.
Limited studies are available on the role of new technology in influencing consumer
behaviors. In virtual settings, consumer buying behaviors are intruded upon by various
factors, such as reviews, comments, website popularity, and ease of shopping. Additionally,
consumer conduct was examined using the behavioral perspective model [50]. Organi-
zations brainstormed how to make product designing more appealing and eco-friendly,
to make customers feel good. In the same line, a UK-based study was conducted to un-
derstand and uncover the various insights related to consumer behaviors and product
design, on their environmental impacts. It disclosed the significance of the improvements
in product designing for a better growth perspective. This would further help in boosting
the carbon footprint. It was concluded that different consumer behaviors and design
innovations acted as key players in addressing and balancing the global environmental
issues in pharmaceutical and healthcare products [51]. Another UK-based study conducted
on consumer behaviors examined the impact of the involvement of personal values, on
e-shopping. Individual consumer attitudes were found to be an undeviating predicator
towards e-shopping behaviors. This acted as an intervening relationship between consumer
behaviors and personal values [52]. E-retailers positioned e-shops by adopting practical
approaches to fulfill customers’ needs, by utilizing the relationship among consumer at-
titudes, consumer behaviors, and personal values. In addition, E-retailers designed and
implemented their retail strategies to boost store performance by analyzing store layouts.
Furthermore, it proved to be a new framework for understanding consumer behaviors.
Organizations monitored consumers’ behaviors using innovative IT tools, which play a
significant role in designing store layouts [53]. The overall perceived price had no direct or
positive effect on customer satisfaction, although customer satisfaction levels were directly
and positively impacted by the perceived quality. These findings witnessed a penetratingly
competitive environment which encouraged organizations to focus on attaining customer
satisfaction through better services and getting the desired outcomes in the long run. In this
way, better customer experiences would ensure meeting the different levels of customer
satisfaction by utilizing available resources efficiently at little or no expense. Hence, to
ensure the customer satisfaction attainment levels, the total perceived price and perceived
quality had been found among the key antecedents [54]. In consumer behaviors, the scarcity
of resources has been broadly recognized as a catalyst in determining the demand levels,
leading to decreased customer satisfaction. A further study projected that scarcity should
increase the evaluation and subsequent advancement of communication in the perspective
of consumer behaviors [55–57]. An investigation conducted in Canada explored that the
faithfulness of clients tended to be higher among service sector consumers. In the service
sector, customers generally have better service experiences, resulting in higher customer
loyalty [58,59]. There is a direct association between European consumers’ conduct and
shopping habits in an offline retail setting, with regards to their utilitarian motivation. As
per the study, a higher level of excitement led to the buyer’s utilitarian motivation. Various
factors of customers’ convenience and customer satisfaction was combined into all kinds of
service settings, to understand consumer behaviors [60].
40
30
20 20
20 13 11 10
10
0
Consumer Consumer Service Consumer Customer Brand
Behavior & Services Guarantee & Loyalty & Relationship Influence
Customer Consumer Consumer Management
Satisfaction Experiences Commitment
Figure2.2.Theories
Figure Theoriesemployed
employedin
inconsumer
consumerbehavior
behaviorstudies.
studies.
Classifiedinto
Classified intosix
sixgroups,
groups, along
along with
with thethe number
number of articles
of articles thatthat matched
matched appropri-
appropriately,
ately,customer
were were customer relationship
relationship managementmanagement (11), consumer
(11), consumer loyalty
loyalty and and consumer
consumer commitmentcom-
mitment
(13), (13), consumer
consumer services
services (20), (20), consumer
consumer behaviors behaviors and customer
and customer satisfaction
satisfaction (46),
(46), brand
influence (10), and
brand influence service
(10), guarantee
and service and consumer
guarantee experiences
and consumer (20). Marketers
experiences were
(20). Marketers
supposed to understand
were supposed the overall
to understand consumer
the overall behaviors
consumer and the ways
behaviors to satisfy
and the ways to them, in
satisfy
order
them,toindeliver
order to unique and
deliver memorable
unique service experiences.
and memorable service experiences.
The
Thenext
nextsection
sectionprovides
providesthe thekey findings
key findingsand discussions,
and discussions,based on the
based on review of the
the review of
extant literature
the extant statedstated
literature in section three. The
in section fourth
three. The section
fourth also talksalso
section about theabout
talks key findings,
the key
based on services
findings, based onand the geographical
services settings settings
and the geographical exploration in the consumer
exploration behavior
in the consumer be-
studies, notable explorations of the study, and the sector-wise detailed results
havior studies, notable explorations of the study, and the sector-wise detailed results of of the study.
the study.
4. Findings and Discussions
This section
4. Findings provides the significant extracted findings and its discussion, based on
and Discussions
the review of selected articles.
This section provides theThe prior researchers
significant extracted deliberated
findings andonitsnumerous factors
discussion, basedthat
on
distress consumer behaviors in various sectorial settings that impact customer retention,
the review of selected articles. The prior researchers deliberated on numerous factors that
service delivery, and service quality. The key findings and their discussions were stated in
distress consumer behaviors in various sectorial settings that impact customer retention,
the sections below.
service delivery, and service quality. The key findings and their discussions were stated
in the sections below.
and offers a basis for refining the customer experience management while planning inno-
vative online services [71]. Colombian retail sectors have gained a fortune by rejuvenating
traditional retailers that stand up against E-retailer rivals by pushing the service scapes
design on the path of growth. Social and physical environments work together to spread
the opulence links for curative service scapes, which support the advancement of the retail
sector in Colombia [72]. However, another Colombian research report stated that there is
no clear-cut association between traditional customers and the virtual customer experience
and there is an essential tranquility in the accustomed retail background. This significantly
impacts the digital informal objectives and predictions of the traditional retail customers.
Contrary to these stated findings, the disseminated messages, as a communication tool,
had noteworthy contributions in the predictable retail background. Moreover, Colombian
consumers generally preferred the traditional method of customer opinion rather than
modern customer communication platforms [73]. Online customer contact points were
more prevalent among customers and vendors than traditional customer contact points. It
was the quickest and most efficient communication method for communication among the
company, customers, and vendors [73,74].
0 10 20 30 40 50
Figure3.3.Article
Figure ArticleDistribution
Distributionby
byService
Servicesettings.
settings.
ItItwas
wasobserved
observedafterafterthe
theanalysis
analysisof
ofall
all of
of the
the articles
articles that
that consumer
consumer behavior
behaviorresearch
research
studies were
studies were primarily set set in
inthe
theretail
retailservice
servicesector,
sector,i.e., offline
i.e., and
offline and online retailing
online retailing(57
(57 studies,
studies, 47.5%
47.5% of allofstudies)
all studies) andhospitality
and the the hospitality
service service
sector,sector, i.e., airlines,
i.e., airlines, hotels, hotels,
restau-
restaurants, resorts,
rants, resorts, and other
and other hospitality
hospitality services
services (34 studies,
(34 studies, 28.4%),
28.4%), and and the other
the other service
service sec-
sectors had 29 studies, with a 24.1% contribution
tors had 29 studies, with a 24.1% contribution of all studies. of all studies.
As
As shown
shown in in Table
Error!5Reference
and Figuresource
4, thesenotstudies
found.were set in various
and Error! Reference geographical
source not
settings, such as
found., these the USA
studies were (23),
set UK (16), Spain
in various (13), China
geographical (8), Australia
settings, such as(7),theIndia
USA(5), (23),Italy
UK
(5), Canada
(16), (3), France
Spain (13), China (8),(3), Australia
Germany(7), (3) India
and other countries
(5), Italy (34). (3), France (3), Germany
(5), Canada
(3) and other countries (34).
FigureFigure
4. Article distribution
4. Article distributionby
by geographical setting.
geographical setting.
The The critical factors affecting consumer behaviors in the service industry were identified,
critical factors affecting consumer behaviors in the service industry were iden
as per the diverse geographical settings, such as USA, Italy, Colombia, Indonesia, India,
fied, etc.,
as perand the
thesediverse geographical
were tabulated in Table 6,settings,
in the formsuch as USA,
of a notable Italy, Colombia,
exploration of the relatedIndones
India,articles
etc., and these
on the were
research tabulated in Error! Reference source not found., in the form
theme.
a notable exploration of the related articles on the research theme.
Geographical
uthor (s) Methodology Key Factors Identified
Settings
Consumers’ responses, Shoppers’ perceptions, Shoppin
[90] USA Focus group interviews
convenience, Purchase intentions
Brand hate phenomenon, Cross-channel setting, Non-
[75] Italy Online survey
repurchase intention
Sustainability 2023, 15, 250 18 of 30
Table 7 states the sector-wise detailed results of the exemplary studies, based on the ex-
tant review of the literature. The summary of the key findings of the exemplary studies were
tabulated, outlining the diverse sector settings and geographical settings.The key service
Sustainability 2023, 15, 250 19 of 30
Table 7. Cont.
It was observed that every service industry emphasized satisfying the needs and wants
of their respective customers by offering better services. They focused on the importance of
recording consumer perceptions so that they could ignite the re-purchase intentions among
consumers, by measuring customer perceptions towards the service quality. This can
further assist service providers in understanding the consumer behaviors in their respective
service industries, to survive and sustain in the business by increasing customer loyalty.
The next section proposes the future research directions of the study by categorizing
the critical findings of the study using the theory (T), context (C), and methodology (M)
framework. This will further contribute to set the tune of future research by offering
directions for further investigation.
This probing could support marketers in interpreting and comprehending the changing
responses of consumers consuming various services rendered by organizations.
Additionally, customers are considered enablers by projecting themselves as an ef-
fective tool for consumers’ evaluations. This is also accountable for the discrepancies in
choices offered to consumers, particularly in the delivery outlook of private food com-
petences. By adapting the understandings from existing studies, customers’ satisfaction
implications and elementary antecedents have been set up to control the outcomes of their
outlooks for service failure and service recovery. Hence, there is a strong onus for fresher
theoretical lenses across diverse service settings, to enlighten the ongoing developments
altering consumer behavior patterns and associated dissatisfactions, for implementing
novel standpoints [103]. The study, based on the ecological behavior of consumers and
their objective to buy natural foodstuffs, was supportive of the defining elements per-
suading customer behaviors towards natural foods [100]. A theoretical viewpoint from
the UK study stated that the quality of service offered significant consideration. In the
context of the service sectors’ relationships with their consumers, suitable strategies for
building and maintaining relationships are required, and limited knowledge has been
acknowledged. Proper execution can lead to enhanced organizational objectives across
diverse geographical dispersions. Previous studies have shown that the place attribute is
related to place affection; it also plays an essential part in driving the required consumer
conduct [86].
6. Conclusions
This study tried to bridge the gap by offering global insights into consumers’ behaviors
in diverse geographical settings. The top databases, such as Web of Science and Scopus,
were explored, to extract the existing literary works related to the research theme and based
on the search keywords by employing the ILR methodology, 120 articles were selected
through advanced inclusion and exclusion criteria. This study provides a better under-
standing of the various aspects of consumer behaviors in diverse geographical and service
settings. In this study, numerous important features and challenges for upcoming research
were found, which were based on the previous literature analysis, and it further delivers im-
portant inferences for both academic researchers and marketing practitioners. The review
was divided into six sub-sections, after a deep segmentation analysis: customer relationship
Sustainability 2023, 15, 250 24 of 30
Author Contributions: Conceptualization, P.S.; Methodology, P.S. and A.C.; Software, P.S.; Formal
analysis, P.S. and A.C.; Investigation, P.S., L.A. and A.C.; Resources, A.C.; Data curation, P.S. and
L.A.; Writing—original draft, P.S.; Writing—review & editing, P.S. and L.A. All authors have read
and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding: This research received no external funding.
Institutional Review Board Statement: Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement: Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement: Not applicable.
Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
1. Kotler, P.; Armstrong, G. Principles of Marketing; Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA, 2001.
2. Komagan, M.L. Impact of Service Environment for effective consumer behavior in Retails Industry with reference to Heritage
Super Market. Turk. J. Comput. Math. Educ. (TURCOMAT) 2021, 12, 4357–4364. [CrossRef]
3. Tran, V.D. Assessing the Effects of Service Quality, Experience Value, Relationship Quality on Behavioral Intentions. J. Asian
Finance, Econ. Bus. 2020, 7, 167–175. [CrossRef]
4. Kim, D.; Hyun, H.; Park, J. The effect of interior color on customers’ aesthetic perception, emotion, and behavior in the luxury
service. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2020, 57, 102252. [CrossRef]
5. Fong, C.-M.; Chang, H.-H.S.; Hsieh, P.-C.; Wang, H.-W. The impact of service category and brand positioning on consumer
animosity in the service sector—A social identity signaling perspective. J. Prod. Brand Manag. 2021, 30, 1229–1246. [CrossRef]
6. Kotler, P.; Keller, K. Marketing Management, 14th ed.; Pearson Education: Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 2011.
7. Hien, N.T.; Su, Y.-L.; Sann, R.; Thanh, L.T.P. Analysis of Online Customer Complaint Behavior in Vietnam’s Hotel Industry.
Sustainability 2022, 14, 3770. [CrossRef]
8. Sann, R.; Lai, P.-C.; Chang, H.-C. Does Culture of Origin Have an Impact on Online Complaining Behaviors? The Perceptions of
Asians and Non-Asians. Sustainability 2020, 12, 1838. [CrossRef]
9. Mari, M.; Poggesi, S. Servicescape cues and customer behavior: A systematic literature review and research agenda. Serv. Ind. J.
2013, 33, 171–199. [CrossRef]
10. Bueno, E.V.; Weber, T.B.B.; Bomfim, E.L.; Kato, H.T. Measuring customer experience in service: A systematic review. Serv. Ind. J.
2019, 39, 779–798. [CrossRef]
11. Sima, V.; Gheorghe, I.G.; Subić, J.; Nancu, D. Influences of the Industry 4.0 Revolution on the Human Capital Development and
Consumer Behavior: A Systematic Review. Sustainability 2020, 12, 4035. [CrossRef]
12. Shen, B.; Tan, W.; Guo, J.; Zhao, L.; Qin, P. How to Promote User Purchase in Metaverse? A Systematic Literature Review on
Consumer Behavior Research and Virtual Commerce Application Design. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 11087. [CrossRef]
13. Mazumdar, T.; Raj, S.; Sinha, I. Reference Price Research: Review and Propositions. J. Mark. 2005, 69, 84–102. [CrossRef]
14. Covington, M.V. Goal Theory, Motivation, and School Achievement: An Integrative Review. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2000, 51, 171–200.
[CrossRef]
15. Gross, J.J. The emerging field of emotion regulation: An integrative review. Rev. Gen. Psychol. 1998, 2, 271–299. [CrossRef]
16. Whittemore, R.; Knafl, K. The integrative review: Updated methodology. J. Adv. Nurs. 2005, 52, 546−553. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
17. Paul, J.; Criado, A.R. The art of writing literature review: What do we know and what do we need to know? Int. Bus. Rev. 2020,
29, 101717. [CrossRef]
18. Gilal, F.G.; Zhang, J.; Paul, J. The role of self-determination theory in marketing science: An integrative review and agenda for
research. Eur. Manag. J. 2019, 37, 29–44. [CrossRef]
19. Hassan, L.M.; Shiu, E.; Parry, S. Addressing the cross-country applicability of the theory of planned behaviour (TPB): A structured
review of multi-country TPB studies. J. Consum. Behav. 2016, 15, 72–86. [CrossRef]
20. Mishra, R.; Singh, R.K.; Koles, B. Consumer decision-making in omnichannel retailing: Literature review and future research
agenda. Int. J. Consum. Stud. 2021, 45, 147–174. [CrossRef]
21. Hao, A.W.; Paul, J.; Trott, S.; Guo, C.; Wu, H.-H. Two decades of research on nation branding: A review and future research
agenda. Int. Mark. Rev. 2019, 38, 46–69. [CrossRef]
22. Paul, J.; Benito, G.G. A review of research on outward foreign direct investment from emerging countries, including China: What
do we know, how do we know and where should we be heading? Asia Pac. Bus. Rev. 2018, 24, 90–115. [CrossRef]
23. Lim, W.M.; Yap, S.-F.; Makkar, M. Home sharing in marketing and tourism at a tipping point: What do we know, how do we
know, and where should we be heading? J. Bus. Res. 2020, 122, 534–566. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
24. Paul, J. Marketing in emerging markets: A review, theoretical synthesis and extension. Int. J. Emerg. Mark. 2019, 15, 446–468.
[CrossRef]
25. Goyal, K.; Kumar, S. Financial literacy: A systematic review and bibliometric analysis. Int. J. Consum. Stud. 2021, 45, 80–105.
[CrossRef]
Sustainability 2023, 15, 250 26 of 30
26. Ruggeri, G.; Orsi, L.; Corsi, S. A bibliometric analysis of the scientific literature on Fairtrade labelling. Int. J. Consum. Stud. 2019,
43, 134–152. [CrossRef]
27. Barari, M.; Ross, M.; Thaichon, S.; Surachartkumtonkun, J. A meta-analysis of customer engagement behaviour. Int. J. Consum.
Stud. 2020, 45, 457–477. [CrossRef]
28. Lubbe, W.; Ham-Baloyi, W.T.; Smit, K. The integrative literature review as a research method: A demonstration review of research
on neurodevelopmental supportive care in preterm infants. J. Neonatal Nurs. 2020, 26, 308–315. [CrossRef]
29. Soares, C.B.; Hoga, L.A.K.; Peduzzi, M.; Sangaleti, C.; Yonekura, T.; Silva, D.R.A.D. Integrative Review: Concepts And Methods
Used In Nursing. Rev. da Esc. de Enferm. da USP 2014, 48, 335–345. [CrossRef]
30. Souza, M.T.D.; Silva, M.D.D.; Carvalho, R.D. Revisão integrativa: O que é e como fazer. Einstein 2010, 8, 102–106. [CrossRef]
31. Torraco, R.J. Writing integrative literature reviews: Using the past and present to explore the future. Hum. Resour. Dev. Rev. 2016,
15, 404–428. [CrossRef]
32. Cowell, J.M. The Advantage of Literature Reviews for Evidence-Based Practice. J. Sch. Nurs. 2015, 31, 5. [CrossRef]
33. Paul, J.; Rosado-Serrano, A. Gradual internationalization vs born-global / international new venture models: A review and
research agenda. Int. Mark. Rev. 2019, 36, 830–858. [CrossRef]
34. Fletcher, K. Consumer power and privacy: The changing nature of CRM. Int. J. Advert. 2003, 22, 249–272. [CrossRef]
35. Paek, H.-J.; Thomas, H.; Hyun, J.J.; Mikyoung, K. Peer or expert? The persuasive impact of YouTube public service announcement
producers. Int. J. Advert. 2011, 30, 161–188. [CrossRef]
36. Vannucci, V.; Pantano, E. Digital or human touchpoints? Insights from consumer-facing in-store services. Inf. Technol. People 2019,
33, 296–310. [CrossRef]
37. Minami, C.; Dawson, J. The CRM process in retail and service sector firms in Japan: Loyalty development and financial return. J.
Retail. Consum. Serv. 2008, 15, 375–385. [CrossRef]
38. Krampf, R.; Ueltschy, L.; D’Amico, M. The contribution of emotion to consumer satisfaction in the service setting. Mark. Manag. J.
2003, 13, 32–52.
39. Martin, D.; O’Neill, M.; Hubbard, S.; Palmer, A. The role of emotion in explaining consumer satisfaction and future behavioural
intention. J. Serv. Mark. 2008, 22, 224–236. [CrossRef]
40. Bansal, H.S.; Irving, P.G.; Taylor, S.F. A Three-Component Model of Customer to Service Providers. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 2004, 32,
234–250. [CrossRef]
41. Williams, C.C.; Windebank, J. Acquiring goods and services in lower income populations: An evaluation of consumer behaviour
and preferences. Int. J. Retail. Distrib. Manag. 2001, 29, 16–24. [CrossRef]
42. Carbonell, P.; Rodríguez-Escudero, A.I.; Pujari, D. Performance effects of involving lead users and close customers in new service
development. J. Serv. Mark. 2012, 26, 497–509. [CrossRef]
43. Renko, S.; Vignali, C.; Dabrowska,
˛ A. Consumer behaviour in the market of catering services in selected countries of Central-
Eastern Europe. Br. Food J. 2011, 113, 96–108. [CrossRef]
44. Zhang, J.; Beatty, S.E.; Mothersbaugh, D. A CIT investigation of other customers’ influence in services. J. Serv. Mark. 2010, 24,
389–399. [CrossRef]
45. Greer, D.A. Defective co-creation: Developing a typology of consumer dysfunction in professional services. Eur. J. Mark. 2015, 49,
238–261. [CrossRef]
46. El-Bassiouny, N.; Taher, A.; Abou-Aish, E. An empirical assessment of the relationship between character/ethics education and
consumer behavior at the tweens segment: The case of Egypt. Young- Consum. 2011, 12, 159–170. [CrossRef]
47. Yi, S.; Jai, T.-M. Impacts of consumers’ beliefs, desires and emotions on their impulse buying behavior: Application of an
integrated model of belief-desire theory of emotion. J. Hosp. Mark. Manag. 2020, 29, 662–681. [CrossRef]
48. Filieri, R.; McLeay, F.; Tsui, B.; Lin, Z. Consumer perceptions of information helpfulness and determinants of purchase intention
in online consumer reviews of services. Inf. Manag. 2018, 55, 956–970. [CrossRef]
49. Zolkepli, I.A.; Mukhiar, S.N.S.; Tan, C. Mobile consumer behaviour on apps usage: The effects of perceived values, rating, and
cost. J. Mark. Commun. 2020, 27, 571–593. [CrossRef]
50. Bhate, S. An examination of the relative roles played by consumer behaviour settings and levels of involvement in determining
environmental behaviour. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2005, 12, 419–429. [CrossRef]
51. Jeswani, H.K.; Azapagic, A. Environmental impacts of healthcare and pharmaceutical products: Influence of product design and
consumer behaviour. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 253, 119860. [CrossRef]
52. Jayawardhena, C. Personal values’ influence on e-shopping attitude and behaviour. Internet Res. 2004, 14, 127–138. [CrossRef]
53. Newman, A.J.; Foxall, G.R. In-store customer behaviour in the fashion sector: Some emerging methodological and theoretical
directions. Int. J. Retail. Distrib. Manag. 2003, 31, 591–600. [CrossRef]
54. Iglesias, M.P.; Guillén, M.J.Y. Perceived quality and price: Their impact on the satisfaction of restaurant customers. Int. J. Contemp.
Hosp. Manag. 2004, 16, 273–279. [CrossRef]
55. Park, C.; Lee, H.; Jun, J.; Lee, T. Two-sided effects of customer participation: Roles of relationships and social-interaction values in
social services. Serv. Bus. 2018, 12, 621–640. [CrossRef]
56. Shareef, M.A.; Baabdullah, A.; Dutta, S.; Kumar, V.; Dwivedi, Y.K. Consumer adoption of mobile banking services: An empirical
examination of factors according to adoption stages. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2018, 43, 54–67. [CrossRef]
Sustainability 2023, 15, 250 27 of 30
57. Wang, H.; Fu, H.; Wu, Y. To gain face or not to lose face: The effect of face message frame on response to public service
advertisements. Int. J. Advert. 2020, 39, 1301–1321. [CrossRef]
58. Nguyen, N.; Leblanc, G. Corporate image and corporate reputation in customers’ retention decisions in services. J. Retail. Consum.
Serv. 2001, 8, 227–236. [CrossRef]
59. Bateson, J. Consumer performance and quality in services. Manag. Serv. Qual. Int. J. 2002, 12, 206–209. [CrossRef]
60. Chang, Y.-W.; Polonsky, M.J. The influence of multiple types of service convenience on behavioral intentions: The mediating role
of consumer satisfaction in a Taiwanese leisure setting. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2011, 31, 107–118. [CrossRef]
61. Singh, J.J.; Iglesias, O.; Batista-Foguet, J.M. Does Having an Ethical Brand Matter? The Influence of Consumer Perceived Ethicality
on Trust, Affect and Loyalty. J. Bus. Ethic 2012, 111, 541–549. [CrossRef]
62. Salinas, E.M.; Pérez, J.M.P. Modeling the brand extensions’ influence on brand image. J. Bus. Res. 2009, 62, 50–60. [CrossRef]
63. Szopiński, T.S. Factors affecting the adoption of online banking in Poland. J. Bus. Res. 2016, 69, 4763–4768. [CrossRef]
64. Walls, A.R. A cross-sectional examination of hotel consumer experience and relative effects on consumer values. Int. J. Hosp.
Manag. 2013, 32, 179–192. [CrossRef]
65. Chau, V.S.; Ngai, L.W. The youth market for internet banking services: Perceptions, attitude and behaviour. J. Serv. Mark. 2010,
24, 42–60. [CrossRef]
66. Ngo, L.V.; Northey, G.; Duffy, S.; Thao, H.T.P.; Tam, L.T.H. Perceptions of others, mindfulness, and brand experience in retail
service setting. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2016, 33, 43–52. [CrossRef]
67. Chi, T. Understanding Chinese consumer adoption of apparel mobile commerce: An extended TAM approach. J. Retail. Consum.
Serv. 2018, 44, 274–284. [CrossRef]
68. Yeo, V.C.S.; Goh, S.-K.; Rezaei, S. Consumer experiences, attitude and behavioral intention toward online food delivery (OFD)
services. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2017, 35, 150–162. [CrossRef]
69. Rodriguez, E.; Berges, M.; Casellas, K.; Di Paola, R.; Lupín, B.; Garrido, L.; Gentile, N. Consumer Behaviour and Supermarkets in
Argentina. Dev. Policy Rev. 2002, 20, 429–439. [CrossRef]
70. Chen, S.-C. The customer satisfaction–loyalty relation in an interactive e-service setting: The mediators. J. Retail. Consum. Serv.
2012, 19, 202–210. [CrossRef]
71. Vakulenko, Y.; Shams, P.; Hellström, D.; Hjort, K. Service innovation in e-commerce last mile delivery: Mapping the e-customer
journey. J. Bus. Res. 2019, 101, 461–468. [CrossRef]
72. Rosenbaum, M.S.; Friman, M.; Ramirez, G.C.; Otterbring, T. Therapeutic servicescapes: Restorative and relational resources in
service settings. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2020, 55, 102078. [CrossRef]
73. Siqueira, J.R.; Peña, N.G.; ter Horst, E.; Molina, G. Spreading the Word: How Customer Experience in a Traditional Retail
Setting Influences Consumer Traditional and Electronic Word-of-mouth Intention. Electron. Commer. Res. Appl. 2019, 37, 100870.
[CrossRef]
74. Marriott, H.R.; Williams, M.D.; Dwivedi, Y.K. What do we know about consumer m-shopping behaviour? Int. J. Retail. Distrib.
Manag. 2017, 45, 568–586. [CrossRef]
75. Curina, I.; Francioni, B.; Hegner, S.M.; Cioppi, M. Brand hate and non-repurchase intention: A service context perspective in a
cross-channel setting. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2020, 54, 102031. [CrossRef]
76. Celuch, K.; Robinson, N.M.; Walsh, A.M. A framework for encouraging retail customer feedback. J. Serv. Mark. 2015, 29, 280–292.
[CrossRef]
77. Karimi, S.; Papamichail, K.N.; Holland, C.P. The effect of prior knowledge and decision-making style on the online purchase
decision-making process: A typology of consumer shopping behaviour. Decis. Support Syst. 2015, 77, 137–147. [CrossRef]
78. Brannon, L.A.; Brock, T.C. Limiting Time for Responding Enhances Behavior Corresponding to the Merits of Compliance Appeals:
Refutations of Heuristic-Cue Theory in Service and Consumer Settings. J. Consum. Psychol. 2001, 10, 135–146. [CrossRef]
79. Díaz, A.; Gómez, M.; Molina, A. A comparison of online and offline consumer behaviour: An empirical study on a cinema
shopping context. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2017, 38, 44–50. [CrossRef]
80. Agnihotri, A.; Bhattacharya, S. Unethical consumer behavior: The role of institutional and socio-cultural factors. J. Consum. Mark.
2019, 36, 124–135. [CrossRef]
81. González, M.E.A.; Comesaña, L.R.; Brea, J.A.F. Assessing tourist behavioral intentions through perceived service quality and
customer satisfaction. J. Bus. Res. 2007, 60, 153–160. [CrossRef]
82. Jamal, A.; Anastasiadou, K. Investigating the effects of service quality dimensions and expertise on loyalty. Eur. J. Mark. 2009, 43,
398–420. [CrossRef]
83. Akinci, S.; Atilgan-Inan, E.; Aksoy, S. Re-assessment of E-S-Qual and E-RecS-Qual in a pure service setting. J. Bus. Res. 2010, 63,
232–240. [CrossRef]
84. Gerrard, P.; Cunningham, J.B. Consumer switching behavior in the Asian banking market. J. Serv. Mark. 2004, 18, 215–223.
[CrossRef]
85. Roy, S.K.; Shekhar, V.; Lassar, W.M.; Chen, T. Customer engagement behaviors: The role of service convenience, fairness and
quality. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2018, 44, 293–304. [CrossRef]
86. Brocato, E.D.; Baker, J.; Voorhees, C.M. Creating consumer attachment to retail service firms through sense of place. J. Acad. Mark.
Sci. 2015, 43, 200–220. [CrossRef]
Sustainability 2023, 15, 250 28 of 30
87. Rita, P.; Oliveira, T.; Farisa, A. The impact of e-service quality and customer satisfaction on customer behavior in online shopping.
Heliyon 2019, 5, e02690. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
88. Islam, J.U.; Hollebeek, L.D.; Rahman, Z.; Khan, I.; Rasool, A. Customer engagement in the service context: An empirical
investigation of the construct, its antecedents and consequences. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2019, 50, 277–285. [CrossRef]
89. Chai, J.C.Y.; Malhotra, N.K.; Alpert, F. A two-dimensional model of trust–value–loyalty in service relationships. J. Retail. Consum.
Serv. 2015, 26, 23–31. [CrossRef]
90. Thomas, A.M.; Newman, C.L.; Finkelstein, S.R.; Cho, Y.-N.; Cascio, A. Consumer responses to shopper solutions in service
settings. J. Serv. Mark. 2020, 35, 237–247. [CrossRef]
91. Lunardo, R.; Mbengue, A. Perceived control and shopping behavior: The moderating role of the level of utilitarian motivational
orientation. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2009, 16, 434–441. [CrossRef]
92. Rayburn, S.W.; Voss, K.E. A model of consumer’s retail atmosphere perceptions. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2013, 20, 400–407.
[CrossRef]
93. Paul, M.; Hennig-Thurau, T.; Gremler, D.D.; Gwinner, K.P.; Wiertz, C. Toward a theory of repeat purchase drivers for consumer
services. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 2009, 37, 215–237. [CrossRef]
94. Tseng, S.-M. Exploring the intention to continue using web-based self-service. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2015, 24, 85–93. [CrossRef]
95. Matute-Vallejo, J.; Bravo, R.; Pina, J.M. The influence of corporate social responsibility and price fairness on customer behaviour:
Evidence from the financial sector. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 2011, 18, 317–331. [CrossRef]
96. Bravo, R.; Montaner, T.; Pina, J.M. Corporate brand image of financial institutions: A consumer approach. J. Prod. Brand Manag.
2012, 21, 232–245. [CrossRef]
97. Artigas, E.M.; Vilches-Montero, S.; Yrigoyen, C.C. Antecedents of tourism destination reputation: The mediating role of familiarity.
J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2015, 26, 147–152. [CrossRef]
98. Johnson, G.D.; Grier, S.A. Understanding the influence of cross-cultural Consumer-to-Consumer Interaction on consumer service
satisfaction. J. Bus. Res. 2013, 66, 306–313. [CrossRef]
99. Sirdeshmukh, D.; Singh, J.; Sabol, B. Consumer Trust, Value, and Loyalty in Relational Exchanges. J. Mark. 2002, 66, 15–37.
[CrossRef]
100. Paul, J.; Rana, J. Consumer behavior and purchase intention for organic food. J. Consum. Mark. 2012, 29, 412–422. [CrossRef]
101. Espejel, J.; Fandos, C.; Flavian, C. Consumer satisfaction: A key factor of consumer loyalty and buying intention of a PDO food
product. Br. Food J. 2008, 110, 865–881. [CrossRef]
102. Aschemann-Witzel, J.; Giménez, A.; Ares, G. Convenience or price orientation? Consumer characteristics influencing food waste
behaviour in the context of an emerging country and the impact on future sustainability of the global food sector. Glob. Environ.
Chang. 2018, 49, 85–94. [CrossRef]
103. Filimonau, V.; Lemmer, C.; Marshall, D.; Bejjani, G. ‘Nudging’ as an architect of more responsible consumer choice in food service
provision: The role of restaurant menu design. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 144, 161–170. [CrossRef]
104. Scholderer, J.; Trondsen, T. The dynamics of consumer behaviour: On habit, discontent, and other fish to fry. Appetite 2008, 51,
576–591. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
105. Young, C.W.; Russell, S.V.; Robinson, C.A.; Chintakayala, P.K. Sustainable Retailing—Influencing Consumer Behaviour on Food
Waste. Bus. Strat. Environ. 2018, 27, 1–15. [CrossRef]
106. Burton, D. Consumer education and service quality: Conceptual issues and practical implications. J. Serv. Mark. 2002, 16, 125–142.
[CrossRef]
107. Botti, A.; Grimaldi, M.; Tommasetti, A.; Troisi, O.; Vesci, M. Modeling and Measuring the Consumer Activities Associated with
Value Cocreation: An Exploratory Test in the Context of Education. Serv. Sci. 2017, 9, 63–73. [CrossRef]
108. Hynes, N.; Manson, S. The sound of silence: Why music in supermarkets is just a distraction. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2016, 28,
171–178. [CrossRef]
109. Bigne, E.; Andreu, L.; Hernandez, B.; Ruiz, C. The impact of social media and offline influences on consumer behaviour. An
analysis of the low-cost airline industry. Curr. Issues Tour. 2018, 21, 1014–1032. [CrossRef]
110. Pérez, M.S.; Abad, J.C.G.; Carrillo, G.M.M.; Fernández, R.S. Effects of service quality dimensions on behavioural purchase
intentions: A study in public-sector transport. Manag. Serv. Qual. Int. J. 2007, 17, 134–151. [CrossRef]
111. Chen, C.M.; Chen, S.H.; Lee, H.T. The influence of service performance and destination resources on consumer behaviour: A case
study of mainland Chinese tourists to Kinmen. Int. J. Tour. Res. 2008, 11, 269–282. [CrossRef]
112. Wang, L. An investigation of Chinese immigrant consumer behaviour in Toronto, Canada. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2004, 11,
307–320. [CrossRef]
113. Gao, L.; Bai, X. Online consumer behaviour and its relationship to website atmospheric induced flow: Insights into online travel
agencies in China. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2014, 21, 653–665. [CrossRef]
114. Wen, Z.; Huimin, G.; Kavanaugh, R.R. The Impacts of SARS on the Consumer Behaviour of Chinese Domestic Tourists. Curr.
Issues Tour. 2005, 8, 22–38. [CrossRef]
115. Bodey, K.; Grace, D. Segmenting service “complainers” and “non-complainers” on the basis of consumer characteristics. J. Serv.
Mark. 2006, 20, 178–187. [CrossRef]
116. Carlson, J.; O’Cass, A. Exploring the relationships between e-service quality, satisfaction, attitudes and behaviours in content-
driven e-service web sites. J. Serv. Mark. 2010, 24, 112–127. [CrossRef]
Sustainability 2023, 15, 250 29 of 30
117. Bruwer, J.; Saliba, A.; Miller, B. Consumer behaviour and sensory preference differences: Implications for wine product marketing.
J. Consum. Mark. 2011, 28, 5–18. [CrossRef]
118. Manaktola, K.; Jauhari, V. Exploring consumer attitude and behaviour towards green practices in the lodging industry in India.
Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag. 2007, 19, 364–377. [CrossRef]
119. Diallo, M.F.; Chandon, J.; Cliquet, G.; Philippe, J. Factors influencing consumer behaviour towards store brands: Evidence from
the French market. Int. J. Retail. Distrib. Manag. 2013, 41, 422–441. [CrossRef]
120. Demoulin, N.T. Music congruency in a service setting: The mediating role of emotional and cognitive responses. J. Retail. Consum.
Serv. 2011, 18, 10–18. [CrossRef]
121. Rodiger, M.; Plabmann, S.; Hamm, U. Organic consumers’ price knowledge, willingness-to-pay and purchase decision. Br. Food J.
2016, 118, 2732–2743. [CrossRef]
122. Helm, R.; Landschulze, S. Optimal stimulation level theory, exploratory consumer behaviour and product adoption: An analysis
of underlying structures across product categories. Rev. Manag. Sci. 2009, 3, 41–73. [CrossRef]
123. Bhandari, M.S.; Tsarenko, Y.; Polonsky, M.J. A proposed multi-dimensional approach to evaluating service recovery. J. Serv. Mark.
2007, 21, 174–185. [CrossRef]
124. Zairis, A.G.; Evangelos, P. Consumer behaviour toward convenience store chains in Greece. EuroMed J. Bus. 2014, 9, 175–197.
[CrossRef]
125. Mortimer, K.; Pressey, A. Consumer information search and credence services: Implications for service providers. J. Serv. Mark.
2013, 27, 49–58. [CrossRef]
126. Kim, N.; Lee, M. Other customers in a service encounter: Examining the effect in a restaurant setting. J. Serv. Mark. 2012, 26,
27–40. [CrossRef]
127. Harris, K.; Baron, S. Consumer-to-Consumer Conversations in Service Settings. J. Serv. Res. 2004, 6, 287–303. [CrossRef]
128. Mattila, A.S.; Wirtz, J. Congruency of scent and music as a driver of in-store evaluations and behavior. J. Retail. 2001, 77, 273–289.
[CrossRef]
129. Joseph, M.; Stone, G. An empirical evaluation of US bank customer perceptions of the impact of technology on service delivery in
the banking sector. Int. J. Retail. Distrib. Manag. 2003, 31, 190–202. [CrossRef]
130. Anderson, L.; Ostrom, A.L.; Corus, C.; Fisk, R.P.; Gallan, A.S.; Giraldo, M.; Mende, M.; Mulder, M.; Rayburn, S.W.; Rosenbaum,
M.S.; et al. Transformative service research: An agenda for the future. J. Bus. Res. 2013, 66, 1203–1210. [CrossRef]
131. Laukkanen, T. Consumer adoption versus rejection decisions in seemingly similar service innovations: The case of the Internet
and mobile banking. J. Bus. Res. 2016, 69, 2432–2439. [CrossRef]
132. Littler, D.; Melanthiou, D. Consumer perceptions of risk and uncertainty and the implications for behaviour towards innovative
retail services: The case of Internet Banking. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2006, 13, 431–443. [CrossRef]
133. Kunc, J.; Reichel, V.; Novotná, M. Modelling frequency of visits to the shopping centres as a part of consumer’s preferences: Case
study from the Czech Republic. Int. J. Retail Distrib. Manag. 2020, 48, 985–1002. [CrossRef]
134. Singh, V.P.; Hansen, K.T.; Blattberg, R.C. Market Entry and Consumer Behavior: An Investigation of a Wal-Mart Supercenter.
Mark. Sci. 2006, 25, 457–476. [CrossRef]
135. Aschemann-Witzel, J.; Jensen, J.H.; Jensen, M.H.; Kulikovskaja, V. Consumer behaviour towards price-reduced suboptimal foods
in the supermarket and the relation to food waste in households. Appetite 2017, 116, 246–258. [CrossRef]
136. Luck, M.; Benkenstein, M. Consumers between supermarket shelves: The influence of inter-personal distance on consumer
behavior. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2015, 26, 104–114. [CrossRef]
137. Manganari, E.E.; Siomkos, G.J.; Rigopoulou, I.D.; Vrechopoulos, A.P. Virtual store layout effects on consumer behaviour: Applying
an environmental psychology approach in the online travel industry. Internet Res. 2011, 21, 326–346. [CrossRef]
138. Grace, D.; O’Cass, A. Examining the effects of service brand communications on brand evaluation. J. Prod. Brand Manag. 2005, 14,
106–116. [CrossRef]
139. Pandey, S.; Khare, A.; Bhardwaj, P. Antecedents to local store loyalty: Influence of culture, cosmopolitanism and price. Int. J.
Retail. Distrib. Manag. 2015, 43, 5–25. [CrossRef]
140. Pantano, E. Cultural factors affecting consumer behaviour: A new perception model. EuroMed J. Bus. 2011, 6, 117–136. [CrossRef]
141. Rahman, O.; Fung, B.C.M.; Chen, Z.; Chang, W.-L.; Gao, X. A study of apparel consumer behaviour in China and Taiwan. Int. J.
Fash. Des. Technol. Educ. 2018, 11, 22–33. [CrossRef]
142. Rahman, O.; Chen, X.; Au, R. Consumer behaviour of pre-teen and teenage youth in China. J. Glob. Fash. Mark. 2013, 4, 247–265.
[CrossRef]
143. Roberts, K.; Varki, S.; Brodie, R. Measuring the quality of relationships in consumer services: An empirical study. Eur. J. Mark.
2003, 37, 169–196. [CrossRef]
144. Ryu, K.; Han, H.; Jang, S. Relationships among hedonic and utilitarian values, satisfaction and behavioral intentions in the
fast-casual restaurant industry. Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag. 2010, 22, 416–432. [CrossRef]
145. Weber, K. Consumer perceptions and behavior: Neglected dimensions in research on strategic airline alliances. J. Travel Tour.
Mark. 2003, 13, 27–45. [CrossRef]
146. O’Neill, M.; Palmer, A. Survey timing and consumer perceptions of service quality: An overview of empirical evidence. Manag.
Serv. Qual. Int. J. 2001, 11, 182–190. [CrossRef]
147. O’Cass, A.; Grace, D. Exploring consumer experiences with a service brand. J. Prod. Brand Manag. 2004, 13, 257–268. [CrossRef]
Sustainability 2023, 15, 250 30 of 30
148. Kinard, B.R.; Capella, M.L. Relationship marketing: The influence of consumer involvement on perceived service benefits. J. Serv.
Mark. 2006, 20, 359–368. [CrossRef]
149. Rodríguez del Bosque, I.A.; Martín, H.S.; Collado, J. The role of expectations in the consumer satisfaction formation process:
Empirical evidence in the travel agency sector. Tour. Manag. 2006, 27, 410–419. [CrossRef]
150. Di Talia, E.; Simeone, M.; Scarpato, D. Consumer behaviour types in household food waste. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 214, 166–172.
[CrossRef]
151. Ampountolas, A. Peer-to-peer marketplaces: A study on consumer purchase behavior. J. Hosp. Tour. Insights 2019, 2, 37–54.
[CrossRef]
152. Baek, J.; Lee, J. A Conceptual Framework on Reconceptualizing Customer Share of Wallet (SOW): As a Perspective of Dynamic
Process in the Hospitality Consumption Context. Sustainability 2021, 13, 1423. [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual
author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to
people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.