You are on page 1of 1

RESEARCH HIGHLIGHTS

Nature Reviews Immunology | Published online 25 Apr 2018; doi:10.1038/nri.2018.30

Macmillan Publishers Limited


INFLUENZA VIRUS

Choose your enemies wisely


Influenza virus has two major surface several NA-reactive antibodies
glycoproteins: haemagglutinin (HA), inhibit the enzymatic activity of NA
which promotes viral entry into host from divergent strains of influenza
cells, and neuraminidase (NA), which virus. Furthermore, almost half of
facilitates the release of newly formed the NA-reactive antibodies tested
viral particles. Current influenza were able to inhibit viral replication
vaccines have focused on inducing in vitro. Epitope mapping studies
HA-reactive antibodies; however, identified four amino acids in the
Chen et al. have found that influenza head of N1 and three amino acids in
infections in humans induce anti­bodies the conserved enzymatic domain of
against NA that provide protection N2 that were crucial for the binding
against divergent virus strains. of NA-inhibiting antibodies. Of note,
Previous studies have suggested these epitopes are disrupted in the
that immunity to NA protects against available influenza vaccines.
influenza virus, but little has been Treating mice prophylactically
known concerning human antibody with patient-derived NA-reactive
responses to NA. Chen et al. charac- monoclonal antibodies protected
terized plasmablasts from patients against lethal challenge with influenza
infected with H1N1 and H3N2 virus. Almost all (11 of 13) of the
strains of influenza virus and found N2‑reactive monoclonal antibodies
a surprisingly high proportion of tested provided protection against
these cells were NA-reactive. Indeed, an H3N2 influenza strain, whereas
plasmablasts from H3N2‑infected 5 of 8 tested N1‑reactive monoclonal
patients predominantly targeted NA. antibodies protected against an
Overall, they found that around H1N1 strain; 4 of these 5 protective
25% of plasmablasts induced by N1‑reactive antibodies also protected
natural influenza virus infection against an engineered H5N1 avian
targeted NA, whereas only 1–2% of influenza virus strain. Moreover, the
plasmablasts induced by influenza protective antibodies were effective
vaccination were specific for NA. when delivered therapeutically to
This suggested that current influenza mice 48 hours after infection.
vaccines do not induce NA-reactive The efficacy of current seasonal
antibodies efficiently. In agreement influenza vaccines has ranged from
optimizing the with this, NA-reactive antibodies 19% to 48% during the past three
NA component were induced in mice infected with seasons. This study suggests that
in the next live or inactivated influenza virions optimizing the NA component in the
but not in mice vaccinated with next generation of influenza vaccines
generation
commercially available vaccines. could greatly enhance their protec-
of influenza Characterization of monoclonal tive capacity, particularly as the rate
vaccines antibodies obtained from patients of NA antigenic drift is slower than
could greatly infected with influenza virus that of HA.
showed that NA-specific antibodies Yvonne Bordon
enhance their were more broadly cross-reactive
protective against a range of influenza virus
ORIGINAL ARTICLE Chen, Y. et al. Influenza
infection in humans induces broadly cross-
capacity strains than HA-specific antibodies. reactive and protective neuraminidase-reactive
antibodies. Cell 173, 417–429 (2018)
Additional analyses indicated that

NATURE REVIEWS | IMMUNOLOGY www.nature.com/nri


©
2
0
1
8
M
a
c
m
i
l
l
a
n
P
u
b
l
i
s
h
e
r
s
L
i
m
i
t
e
d
,
p
a
r
t
o
f
S
p
r
i
n
g
e
r
N
a
t
u
r
e
.
A
l
l
r
i
g
h
t
s
r
e
s
e
r
v
e
d
.

You might also like