Nature Reviews Immunology | Published online 25 Apr 2018; doi:10.1038/nri.2018.30
Macmillan Publishers Limited
INFLUENZA VIRUS
Choose your enemies wisely
Influenza virus has two major surface several NA-reactive antibodies glycoproteins: haemagglutinin (HA), inhibit the enzymatic activity of NA which promotes viral entry into host from divergent strains of influenza cells, and neuraminidase (NA), which virus. Furthermore, almost half of facilitates the release of newly formed the NA-reactive antibodies tested viral particles. Current influenza were able to inhibit viral replication vaccines have focused on inducing in vitro. Epitope mapping studies HA-reactive antibodies; however, identified four amino acids in the Chen et al. have found that influenza head of N1 and three amino acids in infections in humans induce antibodies the conserved enzymatic domain of against NA that provide protection N2 that were crucial for the binding against divergent virus strains. of NA-inhibiting antibodies. Of note, Previous studies have suggested these epitopes are disrupted in the that immunity to NA protects against available influenza vaccines. influenza virus, but little has been Treating mice prophylactically known concerning human antibody with patient-derived NA-reactive responses to NA. Chen et al. charac- monoclonal antibodies protected terized plasmablasts from patients against lethal challenge with influenza infected with H1N1 and H3N2 virus. Almost all (11 of 13) of the strains of influenza virus and found N2‑reactive monoclonal antibodies a surprisingly high proportion of tested provided protection against these cells were NA-reactive. Indeed, an H3N2 influenza strain, whereas plasmablasts from H3N2‑infected 5 of 8 tested N1‑reactive monoclonal patients predominantly targeted NA. antibodies protected against an Overall, they found that around H1N1 strain; 4 of these 5 protective 25% of plasmablasts induced by N1‑reactive antibodies also protected natural influenza virus infection against an engineered H5N1 avian targeted NA, whereas only 1–2% of influenza virus strain. Moreover, the plasmablasts induced by influenza protective antibodies were effective vaccination were specific for NA. when delivered therapeutically to This suggested that current influenza mice 48 hours after infection. vaccines do not induce NA-reactive The efficacy of current seasonal antibodies efficiently. In agreement influenza vaccines has ranged from optimizing the with this, NA-reactive antibodies 19% to 48% during the past three NA component were induced in mice infected with seasons. This study suggests that in the next live or inactivated influenza virions optimizing the NA component in the but not in mice vaccinated with next generation of influenza vaccines generation commercially available vaccines. could greatly enhance their protec- of influenza Characterization of monoclonal tive capacity, particularly as the rate vaccines antibodies obtained from patients of NA antigenic drift is slower than could greatly infected with influenza virus that of HA. showed that NA-specific antibodies Yvonne Bordon enhance their were more broadly cross-reactive protective against a range of influenza virus ORIGINAL ARTICLE Chen, Y. et al. Influenza infection in humans induces broadly cross- capacity strains than HA-specific antibodies. reactive and protective neuraminidase-reactive antibodies. Cell 173, 417–429 (2018) Additional analyses indicated that