Project Guideline Diploma in Information Technology (Digital Technology)

Politeknik Malaysia
1st Edition

@Percetakan Zainon Kassim Sdn Bhd

Cetakan Pertama: Disember 2018

Hak cipta terpelihara. Tiada bahagian daripada terbitan ini boleh diterbitkan semula, disimpan
untuk pengeluaran atau ditukar kepada sebarang bentuk atau dengan sebarang alat juga pun,
sama ada dengan cara elektronik gambar, fotokopi, rakaman dan sebagainya, sebelum
mendapat kebenaran bertulis daripada pihak Penerbitan Politeknik Sultan Idris Shah.

All rights reserved. None of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or
by any means, electronic or mechanical including photocopy, recording or any information
storage and retrieval system, without written permission from the Publisher of Politeknik Sultan
Idris Shah.

Diterbitkan oleh Politeknik Sultan Idris Shah dan dicetak di Malaysia oleh / Published by
Politeknik Sultan Idris Shah and printed in Malaysia by
PERCETAKAN ZAINON KASSIM SDN. BHD.
30100 No.1 TKT Kilang Kaw P'Ind Silibin Ipoh Perak,
Kawasan Perkilangan Jelapang, 30100 Ipoh,
Perak Darul Ridzuan.
Tel: 05-528 0506

i
 COMMITTEES

ADVISOR

HASANAH BINTI MD AMIN (BK JPPKK)

NIZAM BIN MOHD NASIR (PSIS)

WRITER

ABD AZIZ BIN BAKERI (BK JPPKK)

MUHAMMAD FAIZ BIN PAUZI (BK JPPKK)
MOHAMMAD NOOR BIN IBRAHIM (PSIS)
SITI DIANAH BINTI ABDUL BUJANG (PSIS)
AINIE HAYATI BINTI NORUZMAN (PSIS)
SYAIFUL IZWAN MAHMUD (PSIS)
RUZANNA BINTI ABU BAKAR (PSIS)
ZALEHA BINTI SALAMON (PSIS)
SHARIZAN BINTI MAT SAAT (PSIS)
ANIRAH BINTI AHMAD (PSP)
LIYANA BINTI MAT RANI (PSP)
SAIFUL BAHARIN BIN HAIRUDDIN (PUO)
NURIZAH BINTI MAHMOR (PUO)
MOHD RAZIF MUSTAPHA (PBU)
NOORISMAAWI BIN YUSOP (PBU)
MOHD ASYRAF BIN MOHD ARSHAD (PSP)
ROHAZLIN BINTI MOHAMED IQBAL (PSP)
RASMALIZA BINTI RASHID (PKT)
ROZITA BINTI MD ALI (PKT)
FAZILAH BINTI ISMAIL (PMS)
NOR ANALIZA BT CHE KHALID (PMS)
FIFDIL MAJIWAN (PMU)
NORADILAH BINTI HJ SUKOR (PMJ)
MAS AYU BINTI MOHD ARIFF (PMJ)
ANDING ANAK NYUAK (PKS)

EDITOR

MOHAMMAD NOOR BIN IBRAHIM (PSIS)

SITI DIANAH BINTI ABDUL BUJANG (PSIS)

PROOFREADER

WAN MUNIRAH BINTI WAN MOHAMED (PSIS)

ii
TABLE OF CONTENTS

NO. TITLE PAGES

1.0 INTRODUCTION 1
2.0 PROJECT SELECTION CRITERIA 1
3.0 PROJECT PROCEDURES 1
4.0 PROJECT PLANNER 2
5.0 PROJECT GANTT CHART 3
6.0 DOCUMENTATION FORMAT 4
7.0 TECHNICAL PROJECT REPORT 5
8.0 ASSESSMENT RUBRIC 8
9.0 APPENDICES 25
Appendix i : Proposal Guidelines 26
Appendix ii : Technical / Proposal Report Cover 27
Appendix iii : Task Summaries 28
Appendix iv : Testing 29
Appendix v : Compliance and Auditing / Checklist Form 30
Appendix vi : References 31

iii
 1.0 INTRODUCTION

PROJECT GUIDELINE Diploma in Information Technology (Digital Technology) Politeknik

Malaysia is to be used by student and lecturer of Jabatan Teknologi Maklumat Dan Komunikasi
Politeknik Malaysia. This guideline is for Diploma in Information Technology (Digital
Technology) track Networking System, track Software and Application Development and track
Information Security only. The student project is a compulsory course to be taken for 5th
semester students for the 3 years and 4th semester students for the 2.5 years diploma program.
Each student will complete a project based on their field of study. The project guideline allows
the students an opportunity to practice their theoretical knowledge and problem solving in the
area of information technology. Students will be assessed on their skills in designing, problem
solving, and performing technical management work.

2.0 PROJECT SELECTION CRITERIA

i. Projects must be developed in accordance to the requirements of industry, community

or organization and can be commercialized if appropriate.
ii. Projects should have future upgrade values, which can be made to improve the quality
of the project.
iii. All propose projects must be original. Students who plagiarized will be STRICTLY
penalized and result will be failed.
iv. Selection of project scope and topic can be done through discussion with the
coordinator and supervisor. Student also can propose the topic themselves, and must be
approved by the head of program, coordinator or supervisor.

3.0 PROJECT PROCEDURES

i. Change project title

Students are allowed to change their project title within ONE (1) week with project
coordinator or supervisor approval.

ii. Task Summary

Each student should describe their task individually. The task should be different within
team members.

iii. Attendance
Attendance must be at least 80%, if not students’ coursework assessments marks will be
disregarded.

iv. Copyright
The Polytechnic will be the owner of all findings, designs, patents and other intellectual
property rights of the student projects.

v. Plagiarism
Students may discuss with their supervisors if they are in doubt of plagiarism. If found
committed plagiarism, strict action will be taken against the students.
1
4.0 PROJECT PLANNER

SHORT
WEEK TASK ASSESSMENT MARK REMARK
SEM
1.0 PROJECT PROPOSAL. STUDENT /
Week 1
SUPERVISOR
1.1 Prepare project plan and
project design STUDENT /
PROPOSAL
Week 2 Week 1 CLO 1(10%) SUPERVISOR /
PRESENTATION
ACCESSOR
STUDENT /
Week 2 SUPERVISOR

STUDENT /
Week 3
SUPERVISOR
Week 2
STUDENT /
Week 4
SUPERVISOR

STUDENT /
Week 5
SUPERVISOR
Week 3
2.0 PROJECT DEVELOPMENT. STUDENT /
Week 6 DEMO #1 CLO 2(20%)
2.1 Plan requirement and design SUPERVISOR
specifications.
STUDENT /
Week 7 2.2 Manage the hardware or SUPERVISOR
Week 4 software configuration.
Week 8
2.3 Develop problem specification STUDENT /
and design. SUPERVISOR

STUDENT /
Week 9
SUPERVISOR
Week 5
Week STUDENT /
DEMO #2 CLO 2(20%)
10 SUPERVISOR

Week STUDENT /
11 SUPERVISOR

Week STUDENT /
Week 6
12 SUPERVISOR

Week STUDENT /
12 3.0 DELIVERABLES. SUPERVISOR
3.1 Present deliverables.
Week STUDENT /
3.2 Prepare project SUPERVISOR
13
Week 7 documentation.
Week 3.3 Present final project. STUDENT /
14 SUPERVISOR

CAPSTONE PROJECT PRESENTATION.

● Capstone project presentation CAPSTONE PROJECT
CLO 1(5 %) STUDENT /
Week 1. Technical Report
Week 8 ● Capstone Correction CLO 2(45 %) SUPERVISOR /
15 2. End Product
● Re-Present Capstone Project 3. Log Book
GSA (100%) ACCESSOR
● Full Documents and Project
Submitted

*This planner can be amendable accordance to polytechnic.

2
5.0 PROJECT GANTT CHART

WEEKS W1 W2 W3 W4 W5 W6 W7 W8 W9 W10 W11 W12 W13 W14 W15

PLANNING WEEK 1 WEEK 2 WEEK 3 WEEK 4 WEEK 5 WEEK 6 WEEK 7 WEEK 8
1.0 PROJECT PROPOSAL.
Prepare project plan and project design
PROPOSAL PRESENTATION
2.0 PROJECT DEVELOPMENT.
2.1 Plan requirement and design specifications.
2.2 Manage the hardware or software configuration.
2.3 Develop problem specification and design.
DEMO 1 PRESENTATION
2.0 PROJECT DEVELOPMENT. (Continue)
2.1 Plan requirement and design specifications.
2.2 Manage the hardware or software configuration.
2.3 Develop problem specification and design.
DEMO 2 PRESENTATION
2.0 PROJECT DEVELOPMENT. (Continue)
2.1 Plan requirement and design specifications.
2.2 Manage the hardware or software configuration.
2.3 Develop problem specification and design.
3.0 DELIVERABLES.
3.1 Present deliverables.
3.2 Prepare project documentation.
3.3 Present final project.
CAPSTONE PROJECT PRESENTATION
• Capstone project presentation
• Project refining
• Re-Present Capstone Project
• Full Documents and Project Submission

*This Gantt chart can be amendable accordance to polytechnic

3
6.0 DOCUMENTATION FORMAT
Table 1.0 shows the documentation format for technical report.

Table 1.0 : Documentation Format

ITEMS DESCRIPTION
Cover Page The cover of technical project report must contain project title, authors
name, registration number, department name, polytechnic name and
session of study.
* Refers at Appendix ii.

Paper and Size Use only high quality white A4 70-gram or A4 80-gram paper, size
210mm X 297mm.

Margin For each page, the margin should be:

● Left: 40 mm
● Right, Top and Bottom: 25 mm
● Header and Footer: 15 mm

Format 1.15 spacing should be used in preparing the technical project report
including tables or charts. The format which acceptable is:
● Font Type: Times New Roman, Font Size: 12 pt.
● Chapter Title: Uppercase, Bold, Centered
(e.g: 1.0 PROJECT PLAN)
● Chapter Sub-section: Title Case, Bold, Align left
(e.g: 1.1 Introduction)
● Paragraph: Justify

Figure and Table All tables, charts, figures, and graphs should be numbered and titled.
Both number and title should be centered either directly above tables
label or directly below figure label. The numbering must be related to
the Chapter.
(e.g: Figure 1.1: The Interface of System)
Number of Chapter Number of Figure/Table

(e.g: Table 2.1: Hardware Requirement)

Technical Project Report must be written minimum 30 pages length and not more than 50
Report pages EXCLUDED front page, appendix and references.

Paging Bottom right.

References Any material taken from another source must be cited and a brief
reference to its source must be included in the text. Students must
follow The American Psychological Association (APA) reference citations
style for references in text.
* Refers at Appendix vi.

Binding Report cover must be comb binding with plastic cover, blue color and 14
times New Roman font face.
4
 7.0 TECHNICAL PROJECT REPORT
Table 2.0 shows the content of technical report.

Table 2.0 : Content of technical report

NO. ITEMS DESCRIPTION

Abstract A brief summary of project to help user understand the
project problems, purpose, methods and scope but NOT
results, conclusions and recommendations. It must be
below 100 words only in one paragraph.

Table Of Contents Table of content must have page number and sequence
to the report items.

1.0 Project Plan 1.1 Introduction

A brief description of the product to be produced.

1.2 Problem Statement

A concise description of an issue to be addressed or a
condition to be improved.

1.3 Objective of Project

Purpose of the project should be in point form
e.g:
i. Objective 1
ii. Objective 2
iii. Objective 3

The objectives must be specific, measurable, achievable,

relevant and time oriented.

1.4 Scope of Project

State the user scope or project boundaries while doing
this project. This scope will make sure that this project
will be done correctly according to the stated scope. It is
suggested to state scope by module of function.
*The details of the scope depend on supervisor or client
needs.

1.5 Literature Review

Reference of previous studies that relevant to the
project.

1.6 Methodology of Project

Briefly explain the project development model based on
methodology that suitable with the project.

1.7 Project Gantt Chart

Create the timeline of the project progress to complete
the project. Refer to page 3 (Project Gantt Chart).

5
NO. ITEMS DESCRIPTION
2.0 Requirement 2.1 Functional Requirement
Specifications List of project main functions.

2.2 Non Functional Requirement

Define system attributes such as security, reliability,
performance, maintainability, scalability and usability.

2.3 Hardware and Software Requirement

List of hardware and software specification to be used in
the project in a table form.

2.4 System Configuration

Explain how to configure the system.

2.5 Security Requirement / Exceptional Handling

Explain the security features / exceptional handling
method implemented in the project.

3.0 Final Design 3.1 Logical Design

Explain and show the detailed of logical design project. It
includes all system development diagrams such as data
flow diagram, flowcharts, entity relationship diagram,
contact diagram, schematic diagrams and network
logical topology.

3.2 Physical Design

Explain and show the detailed of physical design project.
It includes all user interface design network physical
topology.

or

3.2 Experimental Concept

Explain and show the detailed planning of studies to
meet objective, collect data using suitable tools and
executed experiment.

6
 NO. ITEMS DESCRIPTION
4.0 Test Description And Students need to explain the development of process
Results and result of the project. The testing processes also must
be done to verify the functionality of the project.

4.1 Unit Testing Plan

Describe the unit testing scope and activities based on
the given example.

4.2 Integration Testing Plan

Describe the integration testing activities based on the
given example.

4.3 User Acceptance Test (if applicable)

Describe the user acceptance testing activities based on
the given example.
*The example refers at Appendix iv.

5.0 Discussions 5.1 Advantage of the Project

List the advantage(s) of end product / final output that
has been achieved.

5.2 Limitation of the Project

List the limitation(s) of end product / final output.

6.0 Conclusions And Students should make conclusion about the project and
Recommendations discuss the importance of the project outcome. Students
also have to make recommendation(s) or suggestion(s)
in order to enhance the project for future works.

7.0 References List of works cited from published books, public

document, journals, articles, thesis, magazines, films,
videos, slides, maps, unpublished materials and
electronic materials including websites. The way of
written is follow the APA style format.
* Refers at Appendix vi.

7
ASSESSMENT RUBRIC

8
 SUPERVISOR
PROPOSAL PRESENTATION (10%)
DFT6014 - INTEGRATED PROJECT ASSESSOR

STUDENT INFORMATION

COURSE NAME INTEGRATED PROJECT COURSE CODE DFT6014

PROJECT TITLE CLASS

SUPERVISOR NAME DATE

S1: S1:
REGISTRATION
STUDENT NAME S2: S2:
NUMBER
S3: S3:

Proposal Presentation Score Student Score

Aspects
5 4 3 2 1 0 S1 S2 S3
1. Introduction Always clearly Clearly explains the Sometimes clearly Occasionally Unclear and Vague about the
[CLO 1] explains the project project to be explains the project explains the project incomplete project to be
to be undertaken undertaken most of to be undertaken to be undertaken understanding of undertaken
the time the project to be
taken
2. Problem Statement Always clearly Clearly explain the Sometimes clearly Occasionally Vague explanations No problem stated
[CLO 1] explains the problems most of explain the explains the of the problems
problems the time problems problems faced
3. Objectives The main objective The main objective The main objective The main objective The main objective The main objective
[CLO 1] is very clear during is clear during first needs to be is clear after review. is clear with is not clear
first submission. submission. improved guidance.
4. Scope Always clearly clarify Clearly clarify Most of the Few of the required No clear clarification Do not clarify user
[CLO 1] system scope and system scope and required system scope and between system between system
user scope user scope most of system scope and user scope are scope and user scope and user
the time user scope are included scope scope
included
5. Project Significance Excellent Very Clear Clear explanations Less clear about State very little Do Not state the
(cannot be measured) explanation of the explanation of the of project project significance about the project project significance
[CLO 1] project significance project significance significance significance
9
 Proposal Presentation Score Student Score
Aspects
5 4 3 2 1 0 S1 S2 S3
6. Literature Review The study carried The study carried The study carried The study carried The study carried No evidence stated
[CLO 1] out very clearly out clearly describe out briefly describe out less related out with unclear
describe related related evidence related evidence evidence evidence
evidence
7. Methodology Methodology Most methodology Few of methodology Lack of Methodology used No correlation with
[CLO 1] associated with associated with associated with methodology was not the methodology of
building projects. building projects. building projects. associated with appropriate. project work.
building projects.
8. References References are References are References are Reference is not Reference does not No references
[CLO 1] significant to project organized and significant to project significant to the follow APA format.
and very organized significant to project and follow APA project but follow
with well- and follow APA format. APA format.
constructed using format
APA format.
9. Gantt Chart Gantt Chart is Gantt Chart is Gantt Chart is Gantt Chart is less Gantt Chart is not No Gantt chart.
[CLO 1] accurate based on accurate based on accurate based on accurate based on accurate based on
project schedule. project schedule but project schedule but project schedule. project schedule.
less specific. not specific.
10. Cost Planning The project is The project is The project is The project is The project is No cost planning
[CLO 1] proposed with an proposed with good proposed with proposed with proposed with
excellent cost cost planning satisfactory cost minimal clarity cost unclearly cost
planning planning planning planning
11. Conclusion Student concludes Student concludes Student concludes Conclusion is vague. Inappropriate No conclusion.
[CLO 1] the presentation the presentation the presentation conclusion.
confidently with few points.
12. Presentation Present with a high Present with a Present with some Present with Present with limited No presentation
[CLO 1] degree of moderate degree of effective ideas considerable ideas ideas
effectiveness and effectiveness and
ideas. ideas

Total Score ( 60 )

Proposal Presentation Score

Formula = ( Total Score / 60 * 10 )

10
 FINAL PROPOSAL PRESENTATION SCORE (10%)
DFT6014 - INTEGRATED PROJECT

STUDENT INFORMATION

COURSE NAME INTEGRATED PROJECT COURSE CODE DFT6014

PROJECT TITLE CLASS
SUPERVISOR
DATE
NAME
S1: S1:
STUDENT REGISTRATION
S2: S2:
NAME NUMBER
S3: S3:

PROPOSAL PRESENTATION SCORE

STUDENT SCORE
TYPE OF ASSESSMENT
S1 S2 S3

SUPERVISOR (A)

ACCESSOR (B)

TOTAL PROPOSAL PRESENTATION SCORE (A + B )

TOTAL PROPOSAL PRESENTATION SCORE (10%)

FORMULA ( (A+B) / 2 )

11
 DEMONSTRATION I (20%)
DFT6014 - INTEGRATED PROJECT

STUDENT INFORMATION

COURSE NAME INTEGRATED PROJECT COURSE CODE DFT6014

PROJECT TITLE CLASS

SUPERVISOR NAME DATE

S1: S1:
REGISTRATION
STUDENT NAME S2: S2:
NUMBER
S3: S3:

Demonstration I Score Student Score

Aspects
5 4 3 2 1 0 S1 S2 S3
1. Progress of Project 50% complete More than 40% More than 30% More than 20% Less than 10% No progress of project
Development complete complete complete complete development
[CLO 2]
2. Interface/ Structure Clearly explain the Able to explain the Explain the project Show the project Project structure No structure design.
Design design of project project structure structure design in structure design design is missing
[CLO 2] structure in details. design briefly. general only. without explanations. some elements.
3. Content and Concept The project does The project does offer The project does The project does offer The project does No solution to a
of Project offer 100% solution 80% solution to the offer 60% solution to 40% solution to the offer 20% solution to problem.
[CLO 2] to the problem. problem. the problem. problem. the problem.
4. System Security and Implement a very Implement a clearly Implement a Implement a fairly Implement a poorly No implementation of
Features/ Exceptional clearly system system moderately system system system system
Handling security/Exceptional security/Exceptional security/Exceptional security/Exceptional security/Exceptional security/Exceptional
[CLO 2] Handling Handling Handling Handling Handling Handling
5. Testing Test cases are very Test cases are clearly Test cases are Test cases are fairly Test cases are poorly No testing
[CLO 2] clearly tested with tested with expected moderately tested tested with expected tested with expected
expected output and output and actual with expected output output and actual output and actual
actual output output and actual output output output

Total Score ( 25 )

Demonstration I Score ( 20% )

Formula = ( Total Score / 25 * 20 )

12
 DEMONSTRATION II (20%)
DFT6014 - INTEGRATED PROJECT

STUDENT INFORMATION

COURSE NAME INTEGRATED PROJECT COURSE CODE DFT6014

PROJECT TITLE CLASS

SUPERVISOR NAME DATE

S1: S1:
REGISTRATION
STUDENT NAME S2: S2:
NUMBER
S3: S3:

Demonstration II Score Student Score

Aspects
5 4 3 2 1 0 S1 S2 S3
1. Content and Concept The project does The project does The project does offer The project does offer The project does No project solution
of Project offer 100% solution offer 80% solution 60% solution to the 40% solution to the offer 20% solution to a problem.
[CLO 2] to the problem. to the problem. problem. problem. to the problem.
2. Interface/ Structure Clearly explain the Able to explain the Explain the project Show the project Project structure No project structure
Design design of project project structure structure design in structure design design is missing design.
[CLO 2] structure in details. design briefly. general only. without explanations. some elements.
3. Progress of Project 80% complete More than 65% More than 50% More than 35% Less than 25% No project
Development complete complete complete complete development
[CLO 2]
4. System Security and Implement a very Implement a Implement a Implement a fairly Implement a poorly No implementation
Features/ Exceptional clearly system clearly system moderately system system system of system
Handling security/Exceptional security/Exceptiona security/Exceptional security/Exceptional security/Exceptiona security/Exceptional
[CLO 2] Handling l Handling Handling Handling l Handling Handling
5. Testing Test cases are very Test cases are Test cases are Test cases are fairly Test cases are No testing
[CLO 2] clearly tested with clearly tested with moderately tested tested with expected poorly tested with
expected output and expected output with expected output output and actual expected output
actual output and actual output and actual output output and actual output

Total Score (25 )

Demonstration II Score ( 20% )

Formula = ( Total Score / 25 * 20 )

13
 FINAL CAPSTONE PROJECT SCORE
TECHNICAL REPORT (10%)

STUDENT INFORMATION

COURSE NAME INTEGRATED PROJECT COURSE CODE DFT6014

PROJECT TITLE CLASS

SUPERVISOR NAME DATE

S1: S1:
REGISTRATION
STUDENT NAME S2: S2:
NUMBER
S3: S3:

Technical Report Score Student Score

Aspects
5 4 3 2 1 0 S1 S2 S3
Describe excellent Describe good Describe clear Describe moderate Describe poor Abstract sentence
and specific abstract abstract sentence abstract sentence abstract sentence abstract sentence for project
sentence for project for project for project for project for project problems, purpose,
problems, purpose, problems, purpose, problems, purpose, problems, purpose, problems, purpose, scope and method,
scope and method, scope and method, scope and method, scope and method, scope and method, with many
1. Abstract without without without with moderate with many grammatical errors.
[CLO 2] grammatical errors. grammatical errors. grammatical errors. grammatical errors. grammatical errors. No explanation of
Very good Clear explanations Moderate Not clear Vague explanations the project.
explanations of the of the project explanations of the explanations of the of the project.
project project project

Describe excellent Describe good Describe clear Describe moderate Describe poor Not describe the
and specific sentence for sentence for sentence for sentence for introduction,
sentence for introduction, introduction, introduction, introduction, problem statement,
introduction, problem statement, problem statement, problem statement, problem statement, objective, scope,
2. Project Plan problem statement, objective, scope, objective, scope, objective, scope, objective, scope, literature review,
[CLO 2] objective, scope, literature review, literature review, literature review, literature review, methodology and
literature review, methodology and methodology and methodology and methodology and Gantt chart.
methodology and Gantt chart. Gantt chart. Gantt chart. Gantt chart.
Gantt chart.

14
 Technical Report Score Student Score
Aspects
5 4 3 2 1 0 S1 S2 S3
3. Requirement All requirements are Only 4 requirements Only 3 requirements Only 2 requirements Only 1 requirement No requirement.
Specification excellently describe. are clearly describe. are clearly describe. are clearly describe. is clearly describe.
[CLO 2]
4. Final Design Excellently defines Very well defines Clearly shows and Moderately shows Not clearly shows Not shown and
[CLO 2] and shows process and shows process elaborates the and elaborates the and elaborate the elaborate design
in design in design design process. design process. design process. process.
5. Test Description and Use good testing Use good testing Use suitable testing Use suitable testing Use unsuitable No testing
Results technique and technique and show technique and show technique but not testing technique. technique.
[CLO 2] suitable data. Good clear result after clear result after show clear result
result elaboration. testing. testing. after testing.
6. Major Findings and Excellently list Very well list the Clearly list the Moderately list the Not clearly list the Do not list the
Discussions the advantages and advantages and advantages and advantages and advantages and advantages and
[CLO 2] disadvantages disadvantages disadvantages disadvantages disadvantages disadvantages
7. Conclusions and Excellent Good elaboration of Clear elaboration of Moderate Poor elaboration of No conclusion and
Recommendations elaboration of the the conclusion and the conclusion and elaboration of the the conclusion and recommendations
[CLO 2] conclusion and recommendations recommendations conclusion and recommendations
recommendations recommendations
8. References References are References are References are Reference is not Reference does not No references
[CLO 2] significant to project organized and significant to project significant to the follow APA format.
and very organized significant to project and follow APA project but follow
with well- and follow APA format. APA format.
constructed using format.
APA format.

Total Score ( 40 )

Technical Report Score

Formula = ( Total Score / 40*10 )

15
 SUPERVISOR
FINAL CAPSTONE PROJECT SCORE
END PRODUCT/ FINAL OUTPUT (35%) ASSESSOR

STUDENT INFORMATION

COURSE NAME INTEGRATED PROJECT COURSE CODE DFT6014

PROJECT TITLE CLASS

SUPERVISOR NAME DATE

S1: S1:
REGISTRATION
STUDENT NAME S2: S2:
NUMBER
S3: S3:

End Product/ Final Output Score Student Score

Aspects
5 4 3 2 1 0 S1 S2 S3
1. Project achievement Project is 100% Project is 90% Project is 80% Project is 70% Project is less than No objective
and objective complete and complete and complete and complete and 50% complete and achieves.
[CLO 2] achieve all achieve all achieve most achieve a few achieves only one
objectives and objectives. objectives. objectives. objective.
exceed expectation.
2. User Requirements All user All requirements Several Not more than one Several No requirements
[CLO 2] requirements have were met. requirements were requirement was requirements were were met.
been met and met. not met. not met.
exceeded.
3. Construction and Always describes Most of the time Sometimes Occasionally Least attempts are No attempt is made
functionality effectively how the describes how the describes how the describes how the made to describe to describe
[CLO 2] system was system was system was system was how the system was construction or
constructed and constructed and constructed and constructed and constructed and functionally.
how it functions. how it functions. how it functions. how it functions. how it functions.
4. Feasibility Always clearly Clearly Sometimes Occasionally Least communicated No meaningful
[CLO 2] communicated communicated communicated communicated feasibility of attempt was made
feasibility of feasibility of feasibility of feasibility of construction and to develop a
construction and construction and construction and construction and implementation. solution. Major
implementation. No implementation implementation. implementation. Major error. error.
errors with most of the time. Minor error. Minor error.
notification. Minor error.
16
 End Product/ Final Output Score Student Score
Aspects
5 4 3 2 1 0 S1 S2 S3
5. Originality Product shows an Product shows a Product shows a Uses other people's Uses other people's No originality and
[CLO 2] excellent original good original moderate amount ideas but there is ideas. plagiarism.
thought. thought. of original thought. little reference of
original thinking.
6. Marketability Project Attempt is made to Moderate attempt is Slight attempt is Least attempt is No meaningful
[CLO 2] marketability is communicate the made to made to made to attempt is made to
clearly device’s communicate the communicate the communicate the communicate the
communicated as to marketability most device’s device’s device’s project‘s
how this design is of the time as to, marketability as to marketability, how marketability, how marketability, how
different, better, set how this design is how this design is this design is this design is this design is
apart from what different, better, set different, better, set different, better, set different, better, set different, better, set
already exists. apart from what apart from what apart from what apart from what apart from what
already exists. already exists. already exists. already exists. already exists.
7. Creativity Excellent ideas, Good ideas, creative Moderate ideas, Fairly creative ideas Lack of ideas, No creativity
[CLO 2] creative and and inventive. creative and and inventive creativity and
inventive. inventive. invention.
8. System Security, Excellent Good Moderate Fair implementation Poor No implementation
Features and Testing implementation of implementation of implementation of of user controls and implementation of of user controls and
[CLO 2] user controls and user controls and user controls and validation controls user controls and validation controls
validation controls validation controls validation controls validation controls

Total Score ( 40 )

End Product/ Final Output Score

Formula = ( Total Score / 40 * 35 )

17
 FINAL CAPSTONE PROJECT SCORE
LOG BOOK (5%)

STUDENT INFORMATION

COURSE NAME INTEGRATED PROJECT COURSE CODE DFT6014

PROJECT TITLE CLASS

SUPERVISOR’ NAME DATE

S1: S1:
REGISTRATION
STUDENT NAME S2: S2:
NUMBER
S3: S3:

Log Book Score Student Score

Aspects
5 4 3 2 1 0 S1 S2 S3
1. Weekly activities All 14 weeks of More than 12 weeks More than 8 weeks More than 5 weeks Less than 5 weeks of No activity is
[CLO 1] activities are of activities are of activities are of activities are activities are recorded in log
recorded in the log recorded in the log recorded in the log recorded in the log recorded in the log book.
book. book. book. book. book.
All 7 weeks of More than 6 weeks More than 5 weeks More than 4 weeks Less than 3 weeks of No activity is
activities are of activities are of activities are of activities are activities are recorded in log
recorded in the log recorded in the log recorded in the log recorded in the log recorded in the log book.
book. book. book. book. book.
2. Supervisor Supervisor’s Supervisor’s Supervisor’s Supervisor’s Supervisor’s No signature of
signatures signature of signature of signature of signature of signature of verification of the
[CLO 1] verification is shown verification is shown verification is shown verification is shown verification is shown supervisor.
for all 14 weeks. for more than 12 for more than 8 for more than 5 for less than 5
weeks. weeks. weeks. weeks.
Supervisor’s Supervisor’s Supervisor’s Supervisor’s Supervisor’s No signature of
signature of signature of signature of signature of signature of verification of the
verification is shown verification is shown verification is shown verification is shown verification is shown supervisor.
for all 7 weeks. for more than 6 for more than 5 for more than 4 for less than 3
weeks. weeks. weeks. weeks.

18
 Log Book Score Student Score
Aspects
5 4 3 2 1 0 S1 S2 S3
3. Details Log book is Log book is An appropriate Details are missing, Details are missing No activity done is
[CLO 1] exceptionally exceptionally amount of detail is insufficient and do not illustrate recorded.
detailed, provide an detailed; provide an used to explain the illustration of the the project activities
in-depth look into in-depth look into project activities project activities are done.
the project the project done. done.
activities, and activities.
reflects the
student’s
commitment
4. Neatness The log book is The log book is neat. The log book is The log book is The log book is The log book is in
[CLO 1] exceptionally neat. The pages are in averagely neat. The relatively neat. The unkempt. The pages unsatisfactory
The pages are in good condition, pages are in pages are in are in unsatisfactory condition. It is in
very good condition, handwriting is neat satisfactory, unsatisfactory but condition. It is in virtually unreadable
handwriting is neat and some effort has readable condition, still in readable virtually unreadable condition.
and an obvious been made to keep handwriting is condition, condition. Handwriting is
effort has been the log book legible and some handwriting is Handwriting is illegible. No effort
made to keep the presentable effort has been legible and less illegible. Less effort has been made to
log book made to keep the effort has been has been made to keep the logbook
presentable logbook presentable made to keep the keep the logbook presentable
logbook presentable presentable

Total Score ( 20 )

Log Book Score

Formula = ( Total Score / 20 * 5 )

19
 FINAL CAPSTONE PROJECT SCORE (50%)
DFT6014 - INTEGRATED PROJECT

STUDENT INFORMATION

COURSE NAME INTEGRATED PROJECT COURSE CODE DFT6014

PROJECT TITLE CLASS
SUPERVISOR
DATE
NAME
S1: S1:
STUDENT REGISTRATION
S2: S2:
NAME NUMBER
S3: S3:

CAPSTONE PROJECT SCORE

STUDENT SCORE
TYPE OF ASSESSMENT CLO ASSESSOR
S1 S2 S3

TECHNICAL REPORT (TR) CLO 2 SUPERVISOR

SUPERVISOR

END PRODUCT (EP) CLO 2 ACCESSOR

AVERAGE (A)

LOG BOOK (LB) CLO 1 SUPERVISOR

TOTAL CAPSTONE PROJECT SCORE (TR + EP + LB)

20
 OTHER ASSESSMENT TASK (100%)
DFT6014 - INTEGRATED PROJECT 20

STUDENT INFORMATION

COURSE NAME INTEGRATED PROJECT COURSE CODE DFT6014

PROJECT TITLE CLASS

SUPERVISOR NAME DATE

S1: S1:
REGISTRATION
STUDENT NAME S2: S2:
NUMBER
S3: S3:

LD 3: COMMUNICATION SKILLS
Score Student Score
Aspects
5 4 3 2 1 S1 S2 S3
1. Kejelasan Idea Boleh menyampaikan
Boleh menyampaikan Boleh menyampaikan Boleh menyampaikan Tidak boleh
[CLO 3] idea dengan jelas
idea dengan sangat idea dengan jelas idea dan memerlukan menyampaikan idea
namun memerlukan
jelas. penambahbaikan dan memerlukan
sedikit
lanjut. banyak
penambahbaikan.
penambahbaikan.
2. Kefahaman dan Boleh memahami dan Boleh memahami dan Boleh memahami dan Boleh memahami dan Tidak memahami dan
menjawab soalan menjawab soalan menjawab soalan menjawab soalan menjawab soalan tetapi tidak dapat menjawab
[CLO 3] dengan cemerlang. dengan baik dengan memuaskan. kurang bertepatan dengan soalan.
kehendak soalan.

Total Score ( 10 )

21
 LD 4: CRITICAL THINKING AND PROBLEM SOLVING SKILLS

Score Student Score

Aspects
5 4 3 2 1 S1 S2 S3
3. Penjanaan Boleh menyelesaikan Boleh menyelesaikan Boleh menyelesaikan Boleh menyelesaikan Tidak boleh
Penyelesaian masalah atau menawar masalah atau menawar masalah atau masalah atau menyelesaikan masalah
[CLO 3] penyelesaian alternatif penyelesaian alternatif menawar menawar atau menawar
dengan sangat tepat, dengan tepat dan jelas penyelesaian penyelesaian alternatif penyelesaian alternatif.
terperinci dan jelas. tanpa bantuan. alternatif dengan dengan bantuan yang
sedikit bantuan. maksimum.
4. Integrasi Boleh menyatukan Boleh menyatukan idea- Boleh menyatukan Boleh menyatukan Tidak boleh
[CLO 3] idea-idea sedia ada dan idea sedia ada dan boleh idea-idea sedia ada idea-idea sedia ada menyatukan idea- idea
boleh menghasilkan menghasilkan dan boleh tetapi tidak boleh sedia ada.
penyelesaian baharu penyelesaian baharu menghasilkan menghasilkan
dengan dengan jelas. penyelesaian baharu penyelesaian baharu.
sangat jelas. dengan bantuan.

Total Score ( 10 )

LD 5: SOCIAL SKILLS AND RESPONSIBILITIES

Score Student Score
Aspects
5 4 3 2 1 S1 S2 S3
5. Menghormati orang Menunjukkan rasa hormat dan Menunjukkan rasa hormat dan Menunjukkan Kurang Tiada sensitiviti
lain penghargaan yang tinggi kepada penghargaan kepada hak dan sensitiviti sensitiviti terhadap hak
[CLO 3] hak dan keperluan individu keperluan individu lain terhadap hak dan terhadap hak dan keperluan
keperluan dan keperluan individu lain.
individu lain. individu lain.
6. Sumbangan kepada 1. Sangat bertanggungjawab dan 1. Bertanggungjawab dan Bertanggungjawa Mengambil Kurang inisiatif
masyarakat sentiasa mengambil inisiatif untuk sentiasa mengambil inisiatif untuk b dan mengambil inisiatif untuk dan tidak
[CLO 3] melibatkan diri dalam komuniti. melibatkan diri dalam komuniti. inisiatif untuk melibatkan berminat untuk
2. Mampu berperanan aktif 2. Mampu berperanan sebagai melibatkan diri diri dalam melibatkan diri
sebagai agen perubahan (seperti agen perubahan (seperti dalam komuniti komuniti dalam
menjaga, memperbaiki, menjaga, memperbaiki, pada tahap yang apabila komuniti.
menstabilkan nilai moral dan menstabilkan nilai moral dan memuaskan. diminta
norma) dalam komuniti. norma) dalam komuniti.

Total Score ( 10 )

22
 LD 7: MANAGEMENT AND ENTREPRENEURIAL SKILLS

Score Student Score

Aspects
5 4 3 2 1 S1 S2 S3
7. Organisasi Idea Menyampaikan idea Menyampaikan idea Menyampaikan idea Menyampaikan idea Menyampaikan idea
[CLO 3] dengan cara yang amat dengan cara yang jelas, dengan cara yang dengan cara yang dengan cara yang tidak
jelas, padu dan teratur. padu dan teratur. sederhana jelas, padu kurang jelas, padu dan jelas, padu dan teratur.
dan teratur. teratur.
8. Peluang Mengupayakan idea Idea perniagaan adalah Idea perniagaan Mempunyai Tiada idea untuk
keusahawanan menjadi peluang jelas dan memenuhi adalah jelas tetapi idea penambahan nilai penambahan nilai /
[CLO 3] mengikut strategi kehendak / keperluan tidak memenuhi / penyelesaian masalah penyelesaian masalah /
perniagaan dan pelanggan. kehendak / keperluan yang tidak jelas dan kehendak / keperluan
memenuhi kehendak pelanggan. tidak relevan dengan pelanggan.
/ keperluan kehendak / keperluan
pelanggan. pelanggan.

Total Score ( 10 )

LD 9: LEADERSHIP AND TEAMWORK SKILLS

Score Student Score
Aspects
5 4 3 2 1 S1 S2 S3
9. Kepimpinan Mempamerkan bukti Boleh memimpin Boleh memimpin anggota Boleh memimpin anggota Tiada bukti jelas
Berkesan jelas kebolehan anggota kumpulan kumpulan sehingga kumpulan sehingga kebolehan
[CLO 3] memimpin anggota sehingga projek projek mencapai objektif projek mencapai objektif memimpin anggota
kumpulan dengan mencapai objektif dengan berkesan yang tetapi dengan kesan yang kumpulan secara
berkesan dalam dengan berkesan baik dan memerlukan terhad dan memerlukan berkesan dalam
mencapai objektif. sedikit penambahbaikan. penambahbaikan. mencapai objektif.
10. Menghormati dan Menghormati dan Menghormati dan Menghormati dan Kurang menghormati Tidak menunjukkan
Menerima Pendapat menerima dengan menerima dengan menerima pendapat ahli dan menerima pendapat rasa hormat dan
[CLO 3] sangat baik pendapat baik pendapat ahli kumpulan bagi mencapai ahli kumpulan alam tidak menerima
ahli kumpulan bagi kumpulan bagi objektif. mencapai objektif pendapat anggota
mencapai objektif. mencapai objektif. kumpulan. kumpulan sehingga
menimbulkan konflik.

Total Score ( 10 )

23
 PROJECT SCORE RECORD (100%)
DFT6014 - INTEGRATED PROJECT

STUDENT INFORMATION

COURSE NAME INTEGRATED PROJECT COURSE CODE DFT6014

PROJECT TITLE CLASS
SUPERVISOR
DATE
NAME
S1: S1:
STUDENT REGISTRATION
S2: S2:
NAME NUMBER
S3: S3:

PROPOSAL PRESENTATION AND DEMONSTRATION

PERCENT
ITEM CLO ASSESSOR S1 S2 S3
(%)
SUPERVISOR AND
PROPOSAL PRESENTATION CLO 1 10
ASSESSOR
DEMONSTRATION 1 CLO 2 SUPERVISOR 20
DEMONSTRATION 2 CLO 2 SUPERVISOR 20
TOTAL 50

CAPSTONE PROJECT
PERCENT
ITEM CLO ASSESSOR S1 S2 S3
(%)
TECHNICAL REPORT CLO 2 SUPERVISOR 10
SUPERVISOR AND
END PRODUCT CLO 2 35
ASSESSOR
LOG BOOK CLO 1 SUPERVISOR 5
TOTAL 50

ASSESSMENT TASK
PERCENT
ITEM CLO ASSESSOR S1 S2 S3
(%)
LD 3: COMMUNICATION SKILLS CLO 3 10
CRITICAL THINKING AND
LD 4: CLO 3 10
PROBLEM SOLVING SKILLS
SOCIAL SKILLS AND
LD 5: CLO 3 10
RESPONSIBILITIES SUPERVISOR
MANAGEMENT AND
LD 7: CLO 3 10
ENTREPRENEURIAL SKILLS
LEADERSHIP AND
LD 9: CLO 3 10
TEAMWORK SKILLS
TOTAL 50

24
 APPENDIX

25
i. Appendix i (Proposal Guidelines)

Table 3.0 : Proposal Guidelines

No Topic / Chapter Description

1.0 Introduction Always clearly explains the project to be undertaken.

2.0 Problem Statement Always clearly explains the problems.
3.0 Objectives The main objective is very clear during first submission.
4.0 Scope Always clearly clarify system scope and user scope.
Project Significance
5.0 Excellent explanation of the project significance.
(cannot be measured)
The study carried out very clearly describes related
6.0 Literature Review
evidence.
7.0 Methodology Methodology associated with building projects.
References are significant to project and very organized
8.0 References
with well-constructed using APA format.
9.0 Gantt Chart Chart is accurate based on project schedule.
10.0 Cost Planning The project is proposed with an excellent cost planning.
11.0 Conclusion Student concludes the presentation confidently

26
ii. Appendix ii (Technical / Proposal Report Cover)

DEPARTMENT OF INFORMATION &

COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY

DIPLOMA IN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

(DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY)

AN IMPLEMENTATION OF IPV6 IN WIRELESS NETWORK

ENVIRONMENT

GROUP MEMBERS

NORADILAH BINTI SUKOR 25DDT16F1001

MAS AYU BINTI MOHD ARIFF 25DDT16F1002

RUZANNA BINTI ABU BAKAR 25DDT16F1003

SUPERVISOR

ZALEHA BINTI SALAMON

SESSION : DECEMBER 2018

 iii. Appendix iii (Task Summaries)

Table 4.0: Task Summaries

TASK

No Person In Charge Task Description

1. Student 1 - State all the tasks has been in charged by
Student 1
2. Student 2 - State all the tasks has been in charged by
Student 2
3. Student 3 - State all the tasks has been in charged by
Student 3

** Task summaries are based on allocating project scopes among group members.

Verified by :

............ ...................................................

( SUPERVISOR NAME )

28
 iv. Appendix iv (Testing)

Table 5.0 : Unit Testing Plan (UTP)

UNIT TESTING PLAN (UTP)

Result
Test Case Test Pre- Expected
No. Tester (Pass /
Name Procedure condition Result
Failure)
1. Login User is User need to + case
required to register or Prompt Adriana Pass
fill the sign up notification
username before login. successful
and login!
password
field before
access the
system
2.
*Expected result will be based on the test name procedure.

Table 6.0 : Integration Testing Plan (ITP)

INTEGRATION TESTING PLAN (ITP)

Result
Test Case Test Pre- Expected
No. Tester (Pass /
Name Procedure condition Result
Failure)
1. Login User is None User will
required to directly go to Adriana Pass
click submit homepage
button. system after
login.
2.
*Expected result will be based on the test name procedure.

Table 7.0 : User Acceptance Testing (UAT)

USER ACCEPTANCE TESTING (UAT)

Test Case Test Result
No. Acceptance Requirement Tester Comments
Name Pass Fail
1. Login User is required to fill in the Pass Fifdil (Comments are
username and password given by a client)
before access the system
2.
*Expected result will be based on the test name procedure.

29
 v. Appendix v (Compliance and Auditing / Checklist Form)

Table 8.0: Server Vulnerability & Handling

SERVER VULNERABILITY & HANDLING

No Remarks Yes No
1. Do you used automated tools to assess system vulnerabilities
√
2.

* Subtitle and remarks are depends on type of project.

30
 vi. Appendix vi (References)

References

Book
Barnard, R., de Luca, R., & Li, J. (2015). First-year undergraduate students’ perceptions of
lecturer and peer feedback: A New Zealand action research project. Studies In Higher
Education, 40(5), 933-944. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2014.881343

Ebook
Miller,L. (2008). Careers for nature lovers & other outdoor types. Retrieve from
http://www.ebscohost.com

Website
Nafees, Q., Yilong, Y., Andras, N., Zhiming, L., & Janos, S. (2014, November 19). Anonymously
analyzing clinical data sets. Retrieve from http://arxiv.org/abs/1501.05916

Magazine
Jackson, P. (2011, March 1). Navy Yard Hill and the founding of Washington City. Capitol Hill
Historian, 2, 5-9. https://doi.org/10.1068/20113

Journal
Dumais, S. A., Rizzuto, T. E., Cleary, J., & Dowden, L. (2013). Stressors and supports for adult
online learners: Cmparing first- and continuing-generation college students. American
Journal of Distance Education, 27(2), 100-110.
https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2013.783265

Streaming Video
Heffernan, M. (2015, May). Margaret Heffernan: Why it’s time to forget the pecking order at
work [video file]. Retrieved from
https://www.ted.com/talks/margaret_heffernan_why_it_s_time_to_forget_the_pecki
ng_order_at_work

Interview
Cloyd,A. (2018, July 29). Personal Interview.

31
Scan this QR Code to view e-book