CHE 621

Assignment 1 – Group 3

Name Contribution Signature

Abhishek Panda 25%

Worked on question 1,
reviewed the rest of the
questions
Yamya Vishesh 25%
Worked on question 2,
reviewed the rest of the
questions
Anshuman Ingle 25%
Worked on question 3,
reviewed the rest of the
questions
Anish Unnikrishnan 25%
Worked on question 4,
reviewed the rest of the
questions
 CHE- 62|

Assignatat-1
n=31

Gnen ie d Meaalurenent ooealky-diteibutad

true mean VarGhce

Cornel (alalahons Mean x = 48-17411

Nariance () Go332

Xt Z

48-1419- 36y2.93314 <u <4812419 +I36 x 2-933/9

V31

Lonou

Batchos hawiy yicld

ene Le Meon
Hence (ase-D

Noo X: 45 P&sug =?
 Za 45-48-1742. -|-082 12
2:93314

Noo the yae o the z -|08218 fem Z-tQbke

Px<us)= O1336

Hene 3-96-< batthes have

 X L.M L.V L.M U.V U.M L.V U.M U.V
35 2.53533E-07 0.000842 1.79248E-09 0.000143381
41.2 0.006847944 0.032273 0.000497827 0.012646345
44.7 0.098929174 0.083816 0.026803378 0.052557987
44.9 0.107732684 0.086408 0.03146741 0.05565937
45 0.11211746 0.087649 0.034002508 0.057222166
45.4 0.129143086 0.092191 0.045520351 0.063510146
45.6 0.137096703 0.094182 0.052096654 0.066648044
46 0.151165436 0.097528 0.066762418 0.072825883
46.1 0.154199364 0.098223 0.070710893 0.074336832
46.1 0.154199364 0.098223 0.070710893 0.074336832
46.2 0.157008131 0.098859 0.074756691 0.075829784
46.4 0.161893612 0.099947 0.083100955 0.078752401
46.5 0.163944829 0.100398 0.087377217 0.080177409
46.9 0.169302973 0.101559 0.104872546 0.085581456
47.3 0.169817784 0.101669 0.122257958 0.090403869
47.4 0.169175131 0.101531 0.126460436 0.091502415
47.5 0.168228416 0.101328 0.130569487 0.092554081
48.2 0.153710916 0.098112 0.155208803 0.098452367
48.2 0.153710916 0.098112 0.155208803 0.098452367
48.3 0.150641074 0.097407 0.157935307 0.099067003
48.9 0.128462008 0.092017 0.16875461 0.101440947
49.9 0.085163235 0.079445 0.162920204 0.100173349
50 0.080919287 0.078007 0.160730771 0.099690145
50.5 0.060980893 0.070506 0.146171157 0.096363952
50.5 0.060980893 0.070506 0.146171157 0.096363952
51.4 0.032677309 0.056415 0.109858045 0.087013804
51.9 0.021679627 0.04872 0.087954548 0.080366337
52.1 0.018165208 0.045736 0.079450247 0.07749808
52.2 0.016582457 0.04427 0.075305718 0.076028347
52.2 0.016582457 0.04427 0.075305718 0.076028347
52.6 0.011307791 0.038609 0.059683403 0.06996628
53.3 0.005394714 0.029636 0.037043626 0.059001077
61 4.36447E-09 0.000197 5.41551E-07 0.001103761
 0.18

0.16

0.14

0.12

0.1
Distribution

L.M L.V
0.08 L.M U.V
U.M L.V
0.06 U.M U.V

0.04

0.02

0
30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65
-0.02
YIELD (X)

Chart: Distribution for individual observations at both the lower and upper confidence limits of both the
mean and variance.

Area Under the Curve (Region-

Left of 45% yield) 0.139586

How Could you reduce this percentage?

Answer:
Increasing the Mean and Decreasing the variance can result in less percentage of yield going below 45%. In order to
achieve this, we can increase the productivity of the overall process thus increasing the true mean yield. Statistical
inference can help us identify the current worst-case scenario, but improving the yield would require implementing
process improvements and quality control measures to reduce variability and increase the average yield.

• Process Optimization: Analyze the production process to identify factors that contribute to low yield.
Make adjustments and improvements to the process to minimize losses and increase efficiency.
• Quality Control: Implement stricter quality control measures to ensure consistency in the production
process and reduce the likelihood of batches with low yields.
• Data Analysis: Continuously monitor and analyze yield data to identify patterns and trends that may
provide insights into improving yield performance.
Q.4)

Rank(i) xi P(rank) z-value

1 0.83 0.0333333 -1.835
2 0.88 0.1 -1.28
3 1.04 0.1666667 -0.97
4 1.09 0.2333333 -0.725
5 1.12 0.3 -0.52
6 1.29 0.3666667 -0.34
7 1.31 0.4333333 -0.17
8 1.48 0.5 0
9 1.49 0.5666667 0.17
10 1.59 0.6333333 0.34
11 1.62 0.7 0.53
12 1.65 0.7666667 0.725
13 1.71 0.8333333 0.97
14 1.76 0.9 1.285
15 1.83 0.9666667 1.83

NPP (x-z) Plot

2.5

1.5

0.5

0
0.7 0.9 1.1 1.3 1.5 1.7 1.9
-0.5

-1
y = 2.9704x - 4.0965
-1.5
R² = 0.9511
-2

-2.5

From the Normal Probability Plot (NPP) between the Expected Normal Value on the y-axis and the
Observed Values (xi values), we can confirm that the data follows a straight-line pattern on this plot.
The NPP tool confirms if the data sample comes from a normal distribution. Thus, we can estimate the
population characteristics of this coating thickness using a method that assumes a normal population
distribution.