222 | INDIAN SOCIETY AND CULTURE: CONTINUITY AND CF ANGE,
India being a traditional society having religion as the highest
value in life, no discussion on communalism shall be worthwhile
without the role of religion and religious identity. Here, one can
say that the sense of religious affiliation, w has commonly
been central to the senae of one’s identity, is ordinarily acquired
during childhood in the course of socialization.
Let us go back to the basis of communalist ideology - that
the society is divided into religious communities whose interests
differ and opposed to each other - to see the empirical and
logical fallacies the communalist organizations are proud of
and their misinterpretation of the past. Are the problems of
poverty, unemployment and lack of education and healthcare
not common to all the religious communities? Do their interests
in these matters differ or opposed to each other?
Communalism can be said to have had more than a hundred
years old history, affecting aspects of the socio-cultural and
political life of India in myriad ways. During certain times, it
lays dormant, while being potentially explosive. Bipan Chandra
(1987) in his acclaimed work on communalism a
“communalism was the false consciousness of the historical
proctneas ofthe Taal one hundred fity years, beeause, objectively
fio real conflict between the interests of Hindus and Muslims
existed”. It was a false view of history. He further argues that
“communalism was an expression of and deeply rooted in the
“iereats,anpitaons, outlook: attitudes, psychology and point
“otwieworthe middle asses ina socal sition characterised
by economic stagnation and the absence of vigorous struggle to |
transform society - the communal question was petty bourgeois
question par excellence”. K.N. Panikkar (1991) said that |
‘communalism is a state of consciousness...... which primarily
draws upon certain assumptions of distinct cultural identity
[or member professing the sam gion”, Gyanendra Pandey
(1990) suggested that “communalism is a form o
knowledge, which in it's Indian usage, means a condition of
suspicion, fear and hostility between members of different
religious communities”.
"All these definitions broadly touch upon
the antagnostic relationship whether ‘imagined’ or real between
the two major religious communities such as Hindu-Muslim,
Hingu-Christian, Hindu-Sikh, Muslim-Sikh relations.
Che demand for converting India into a Hindu Rashtra is
the most obvious and popular manifestation of communalism
& scanned with OKEN ScannerSECULARISM, COMMUNALISM AND FUNDAMENTALISM | 223
and V.D. Savarkar, Shyama Prasad Mukherji and M.S.
Golwalkar are seen as the major ideologues of this school of
though Savarkar, in his attempt to arrive at his concept of
‘Hindy(Rashtra’ used the medium of Hindutua and proceeded to
argue that Hindutva is different from Hinduism and the term
Hindutva defying all attempts at analysis, “Forty centuries
if not more had been at work to mould it as it is ... Hindutva
embraces all departments of thoughts and activities of the
whole being of Hindu race” (Savarkar, 1989 edition), While
Savarkar_tries to perfect the rhetoric of a “Hindu Rashtra”
fe looks at all the non-Hindus as Torel
Nr hat ee Hindus as Yoreigners’. He declares in
clear terms that “there are only two courses open to the foreign
elements, either to merge themselves in the national race and
cae Te ge ae aLIEs mere so ong as the national
race may allow them to do so and to quit the country at the
sweet wil i of the national race. That is the onl ly sound view on
‘The minorities problem”, Golwalkar is very clear in his view"
that if the minorities (non-Hindus) and
culture of the National race (Hindus) they may have to lead a
life of ignominy. “The foreign races in Hindustan... may stay in
the country, wholly subordinated to the Hindu Nation, claiming
nothing
deserving no privileges, far less any preferential
treatment... not even citizen right” (1939).
Jamaat-
-[slami, the dominantface of Muslim communalism
and func ism is interested to sve India and other countries
‘as Islamic states, obviously theocratic state. In the Islamic state’
of the chief ideologue of Jamaat-e-Islami Maulana Maud
faududi,
certain defined and specific rights and privileges but would
not be allowed to influence the policy of the state. In the wake
of anti-Ahmdi jots in Pakistan in 1953, he was arrested.
When confronted by Justice Munir Commission probing the
Muslims because of religious differences. Maududi's candid reply
Unveiled his fanatic mind. He deposed that he would not object
ifthe Muslims living in India are trente e Hindu India
a3 Shudra and malecha and Manw’s laws are applied on them
8 Shudra and malecha and Manus Jaws are applied on then
& scanned with OKEN Scanner224 | INDIAN SOCIETY AND CULTURE: CONTINUITY AND CHANGE
depriving them of all share in government and rights as cit
Perhaps, that is why, Jamaat-e-Islami was bitterly o
innah aitd his vision ofa modern Pakistan. Jamaat-e-lelax:
was also opposed to the Jamat-e-UTéma and the Deobang Ting
of ideology of Golwalkar’s Rashtriya Swayam Sevak Sangh
(R.S.S.) and Jamaat-e-Islami is worth noting. Both of these
had no vision of a liberal, secular, democratic state bestowin,
equabrights on all the citizens irrespective of their: caste, colour
and creed. Interestingly, Maulana Maududi, after Partition,
fled. to Jinnah’s Pakistan. It's Indian counterpart Jamaat-e.
Islami Hind remained in India. Though it remains wedded to
the concepts of an Islamic state but has no courage to advocate
it openly and takes a defensive stand. Each fascist system of
thought and politics necessarily looks for or ‘creates"an enemy
ee rte
When we look at the class character of communalism we
Sud that during Colonial petiod the landlords and hee period the Tandlords and bureaucratic
lements (like jagis iclements), moneylenders and merchants
apart from the petty bourgeoisie Provided the internal base for
communalism today. “
communalism have w jor change since 1947”
Gipin Chandra, ibid). Is it easy to assign a socinl class base to
Bharitya Janta Party. the political front of RSS?
Communalism is neither inspired by religion Nor is religion
an object of communal politics, even though the communalist
bases his polities on religious differences, i
asan organizing principle andin the mase Phase of communalism
uses religion to mobilize the masses. Communalism, especially
in it’s violent form, makes a ready appeal to urban poor and
z
urban Tumpen elements whose number has grown rapidly
25 ERIC top SURE sconomi drsog ee BY
migration into cities, tless and im, roverished, millions toda’
We on the margins of society in ushoe clusters. Their social
7 tba clusters. Their social
“The social class character and base of
indergone a maj
SECULARISM, COMMUNA
anger and frustration often
‘communal riot provides an o
COMMUNAL VIOLENCE
Violence between religious
pogroms or terrorism draws
put the underlying and lon
spread of communalism. /
while the communal riots g
ideological precepts amo
further support for com
ideology and politics, wt
ideologues preach in norm
which communal tension:
communal ideology and
violence only it’s external
forms of communal viol
manifestation of the cor
Communal ideology ‘lead
differentiation, distance
(Chandra, ibid).
Communalism and
of the overall Cree
society. Communal .
phenomenon where fi
involved. But more th
rumour mongering
responsible. Any 179
an opportunity to |
and ee enn iy
happenings (of |
justice loving, demon
involvement of thao
soblatantand ee
against the minor
citizen's organ
seat, the .
munali
alte and backward
rl
& scanned with OKEN Scanner