Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Plato and Aristotle’s notion of mimesis are two opposite ideas of artistic
representation. While Plato used this word to ban poetry, Aristotle on the other
hand used it to promote poetry as creative reimagining of life. In an Aristotelian
society, poets are using the nature of human life as an inspiration and reshape
it in a different medium thus the poet is both an imitator and creator,
debunking Plato’s idea that poets are just mere imitator. Another difference is
the fact that Aristotle associates poetry with music, whereas Plato relates it
with painting. It becomes a picture of men's passions and feelings, which are
also mimicked by music, rather than a servile reproduction of their
appearance. Plato claimed that poetry are mere illusions and will cause
detrimental effects on human morale which Aristotle argued since he believed
that the emotions such as catharsis that a spectator or reader of poetry feels
will invoke rational realizations thus it will lead them to better understand
morality. From the abovementioned differences, we can conclude that
Aristotle's idea expanded the reach of imitation's concept. The poet imitates the
reality that lies underneath the surface of things and recreate it as a work of
art that presents moral development.