Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Article
Physicochemical Characterization, Biocompatibility, and
Antibacterial Properties of CMC/PVA/Calendula officinalis
Films for Biomedical Applications
Wen-Hsin Huang 1,† , Chia-Yi Hung 2,3,† , Pao-Chang Chiang 3 , Hsiang Lee 4 , I-Ting Lin 3 , Pin-Chuang Lai 5 ,
Ya-Hui Chan 6, * and Sheng-Wei Feng 3,6,7, *
Abstract: This study reports a carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC)/polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) composite
film that incorporates Calendula officinalis (CO) extract for biomedical applications. The morphological,
physical, mechanical, hydrophilic, biological, and antibacterial properties of CMC/PVA composite
films with various CO concentrations (0.1%, 1%, 2.5%, 4%, and 5%) are fully investigated using
different experiments. The surface morphology and structure of the composite films are significantly
affected by higher CO concentrations. X-ray diffraction (XRD) and Fourier transform infrared spec-
Citation: Huang, W.-H.; Hung, C.-Y.; trometry (FTIR) analyses confirm the structural interactions among CMC, PVA, and CO. After CO is
Chiang, P.-C.; Lee, H.; Lin, I.-T.; Lai, incorporated, the tensile strength and elongation upon the breaking of the films decrease significantly.
P.-C.; Chan, Y.-H.; Feng, S.-W. The addition of CO significantly reduces the ultimate tensile strength of the composite films from 42.8
Physicochemical Characterization, to 13.2 MPa. Furthermore, by increasing the concentration of CO to 0.75%, the contact angle is de-
Biocompatibility, and Antibacterial
creased from 15.8◦ to 10.9◦ . The MTT [3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide]
Properties of CMC/PVA/Calendula
assay reveals that the CMC/PVA/CO-2.5% and CMC/PVA/CO-4% composite films are non-cytotoxic
officinalis Films for Biomedical
to human skin fibroblast cells, which is favorable for cell proliferation. Remarkably, 2.5% and 4% CO
Applications. Polymers 2023, 15, 1454.
incorporation significantly improve the inhibition ability of the CMC/PVA composite films against
https://doi.org/10.3390/
polym15061454
Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli. In summary, CMC/PVA composite films containing 2.5%
CO exhibit the functional properties for wound healing and biomedical engineering applications.
Academic Editor: Bruno Medronho
Received: 21 February 2023 Keywords: carboxymethyl cellulose; polyvinyl alcohol; antibacterial property
Revised: 11 March 2023
Accepted: 12 March 2023
Published: 14 March 2023
1. Introduction
Wounds in skin tissues are usually caused by thermal, chemical, and traumatic injuries.
Wound healing is one of the most complex and dynamic processes in the human body,
Copyright: © 2023 by the authors.
Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
involving homeostasis, inflammation, proliferation, and the remodeling of skin tissue [1].
This article is an open access article
However, wound healing is easily affected and delayed in patients with diabetes mellitus
distributed under the terms and
and complicated systematic health conditions [2,3]. In addition, delays to wound healing
conditions of the Creative Commons significantly increase the risk of wound infection, which results in immune responses, tissue
Attribution (CC BY) license (https:// inflammation, and damage. Thus, the development of wound dressings with biocompatible
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ and antimicrobial properties is important to accelerate the wound healing process [4].
4.0/).
2.4. X-ray Diffraction (XRD) and Fourier Transform Infrared Spectrometry (FTIR)
The crystalline nature of the CMC/PVA/CO films was characterized using X-ray
diffraction (XRD; Empyrean, PANalytical BV, Almelo, The Netherlands) with Cu Kα
radiation (λ = 0.154 nm) in the range of 2θ = 5◦ –90◦ and a step size and scan speed of 0.05◦
and 2◦ /min, respectively.
The chemical compositions of the CMC/PVA/CO films were characterized using
Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy (Spotlight 200i Sp2 with an AutoATR
System, PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA). Spectra in the range of 4000–400 cm–1 were
recorded in transmission mode with a resolution of 0.5 cm–1 .
3. Results
3.1. Surface Characterization
Figure 1 shows the visual appearances of the CMC/PVA composite films containing
different CO concentrations (0%, 0.1%, 1%, 2.5%, 4%, and 5%). All of the films show
an integral and transparent appearance. With an increasing ratio of CO, rougher sur-
faces could be observed in the composite films, especially in the CMC/PVA/CO-4% and
CMC/PVA/CO-5% groups.
3.1. Surface Characterization
Figure 1 shows the visual appearances of the CMC/PVA composite films contain
different CO concentrations (0%, 0.1%, 1%, 2.5%, 4%, and 5%). All of the films show
integral and transparent appearance. With an increasing ratio of CO, rougher surfa
Polymers 2023, 15, 1454 could be observed in the composite films, especially in the CMC/PVA/CO-4%
5 of 13 a
CMC/PVA/CO-5% groups.
Figure 2. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) micrographs of the CMC/PVA/CO composite films
with different concentrations of CO (0.0%, 0.1%, 1%, 2.5%, 4%, and 5%): (A–F) surface morphology
images, (G–L) cross-sectional images (magnification: 1000×).
crystalline properties and phases of the prepared composite polymer films. Figure 3A
shows the results of the XRD analysis. The diffraction pattern of pure CMC features a peak
at 2θ =the
shows 22.20°, whereas
results of the that
XRDofanalysis.
pure PVA shows
The a significant
diffraction pattern peak at approximately
of pure CMC features 2θa=
19.5°at[15,33].
peak The◦diffraction
2θ = 22.20 , whereas thatpatterns of CMC/PVA
of pure PVA showscomposite
a significant films exhibit
peak a peak at 2θ =
at approximately
2θ = 19.5◦indicating
20°–25°, [15,33]. The diffraction
that the strongpatterns of CMC/PVA
interaction between CMC composite
and PVA films exhibit
forms a peak
a composite
at[34]. 20◦ –25
2θ =These ◦ , indicating that the strong interaction between CMC and PVA forms a
results are similar to those of previous studies [15,33]. Interestingly, with the
composite
addition of [34].
COThese
extractresults
(0.1%,are similar
1%, to those
and 2.5%) of previous
to the CMC/PVA studies [15,33].films,
composite Interestingly,
the crys-
with the addition of CO extract (0.1%, 1%, and 2.5%) to the CMC/PVA
tallinity decreases and the amorphous phase increases because the diffraction peak composite films,be-
the crystallinity
comes broad and decreases and the amorphous
weak. Moreover, this phenomenonphasemay increases
be duebecause the diffraction
to the complete dissoci-
peak
ationbecomes broad and
and successful weak. Moreover,
miscibility between CMC this phenomenon
and PVA aftermay the be due to the complete
incorporation of CO ex-
dissociation
tract (0.1%,and 1%,successful
and 2.5%) miscibility betweenthe
[35]. However, CMC leftand
shiftPVAof after the incorporation
the broad peak in the
ofCMC/PVA/CO-1%
CO extract (0.1%,group 1%, and
may2.5%) [35]. However,
be associated with thethe left shift
changes of the broad
in structure peak
and the in
influ-
the CMC/PVA/CO-1% group may be associated with the changes
ence of pure PVA [15,33,34]. In addition, no new diffraction peaks are observed in the in structure and the
influence
CMC/PVA/CO of pure composite
PVA [15,33,34].
films,Inindicating
addition, no thatnew
no diffraction peaks are observed
chemical interaction in the
occurs between
CMC/PVA/CO
CMC/PVA and CO. composite films, indicating that no chemical interaction occurs between
CMC/PVA and CO.
Figure3.3.(A)
Figure (A)XRD
XRDpatterns
patternsand
and(B)
(B)FTIR
FTIRspectra
spectraofofthe
theCMC/PVA/CO
CMC/PVA/COcomposite
compositefilms
filmswith
withdifferent
different
concentrations of CO (0.0%, 0.1%, 1%, 2.5%, 4%, and
concentrations of CO (0.0%, 0.1%, 1%, 2.5%, 4%, and 5%).5%).
The
TheFTIR
FTIRspectra of of
spectra CMC/PVA
CMC/PVAcomposite films
composite containing
films different
containing CO concentrations
different CO concentra-
(0%, 0.1%, 1%, 2.5%, 4%, and 5%) with
tions (0%, 0.1%, 1%, 2.5%, 4%, and their
5%) characteristic
with their peaks are
characteristic presented
peaks are in Figure 3B.
presented in
Wide bands located at 3000–3600 cm −1 are observed for all of the CMC/PVA/CO composite
Figure 3B. Wide bands located at 3000–3600 cm−1 are observed for all of the CMC/PVA/CO
films. These bands are characteristic –OH stretching groups, which arise mainly from
composite films. These bands are characteristic –OH stretching groups, which arise
the strong hydrogen bonding between CMC and PVA. Sharp bands at 2900 cm−1 are
also observed for all films, which are possibly related to the symmetric and asymmetric
stretching of the CH2 groups of CMC and PVA [36,37]. Moreover, the peak at 1750 cm−1 is
assigned to the carbonyl stretching of organic acids and phenolic compounds, which are
the major components of CO [23,37]. Moreover, in a previous study, the major peaks of CO
extract in FTIR spectra corresponded to hydroxyl groups (3488 cm−1 ), alkyl and C-H groups
(2940 cm−1 ), methyl groups (1463 cm−1 ), ether groups (1230 cm−1 ), and terpenoid and
flavone compounds (1049 cm−1 ), which also appeared in the CMC/PVA/CO composite
films [28]. The –CH vibrational band is observed at 1330 cm−1 , and the C-C stretching band
is found at 835 cm−1 . At 1650, 1473, and 1082 cm−1 , symmetric and asymmetric stretching
vibrations of C=O groups for CMC/PVA are observed [36,37]. Overall, similar major sharp
peaks but varying peak amplitudes are observed in the FTIR spectra of the composite films,
indicating that the incorporation of CO does not change the structure of the film matrix.
The TS and EB of the composite films are shown in Figure 4. As shown in Figure
the ous
TS studies,
of the pure CMC/PVA composite film is 42.8 ± 7.0 MPa. The TS decreases wit
where the thickness of composite films increased markedly with increasing
increasing CO concentration
concentrations up extracts
of essential oils and to 5%, of reaching
polymer acomposite
value offilms
13.2[11,12,38].
± 0.5 MPa. The TS o
CMC/PVA/CO-0.1%,
The TS and EB of the CMC/PVA/CO-1%,
composite films are shown CMC/PVA/CO-2.5%,
in Figure 4. As shownand CMC/PVA/CO
in Figure 4A,
the TS of the pure CMC/PVA composite film is 42.8 ± 7.0 MPa. The TS decreases
composite films are 13.5 ± 3.3, 18.2 ± 5.9, 28.9 ± 3.8, and 20.4 ± 1.7 MPa, respectively. with an Am
increasing CO concentration up to 5%, reaching a value of 13.2 ± 0.5 MPa. The TS of the
the CMC/PVA/CO composite films, CMC/PVA/CO-2.5% has the TS closest to that of
CMC/PVA/CO-0.1%, CMC/PVA/CO-1%, CMC/PVA/CO-2.5%, and CMC/PVA/CO-4%
tissue (28 MPa)
composite films[33]. This
are 13.5 ± result
3.3, 18.2is±in agreement
5.9, 28.9 ± 3.8, with previous
and 20.4 studies,
± 1.7 MPa, which indic
respectively.
thatAmong
the more essential oils or extracts were incorporated,
the CMC/PVA/CO composite films, CMC/PVA/CO-2.5% has the TS closestthe greater the decrease
to in
that of skinproperties
mechanical tissue (28 MPa)
of the[33]. This result
polymer is in agreement
composite filmswith previous
would studies, which
be [11,12,38].
indicated that the more essential oils or extracts were incorporated, the greater the decrease
in the mechanical properties of the polymer composite films would be [11,12,38].
Figure 5. Contact angle analysis of the CMC/PVA/CO composite films with different CO concentra-
tions (0.0%, 0.1%, 1%, 2.5%, 4%, and 5%): (A) digital images of the contact angles of water droplets
Figure 5. Contact angle analysis of the CMC/PVA/CO composite films with different CO concentra-
on composite films, (B) average water contact angles of the composite films. Results are expressed as
tions (0.0%, 0.1%, 1%, 2.5%, 4%, and 5%): (A) digital images of the contact angles of water droplets
mean ± standard deviation and statistical significance is represented as (*) p < 0.05.
on composite films, (B) average water contact angles of the composite films. Results are expressed
as 3.5.
mean Biocompatibility of the CMC/PV
± standard deviation A/CO Composite
and statistical Filmsis represented as (*) p < 0.05.
significance
Biocompatibility is essential for biomaterial applications [16]. Thus, the cytotoxicity
Polymers 2023, 15, x FOR PEER REVIEW 9 of 13
3.5.
ofBiocompatibility of the CMC/PVA/CO
the prepared CMC/PVA/CO compositeComposite
films was Films
evaluated using the MTT assay. The
cellBiocompatibility
morphology and is cellessential
viabilityfor
of human dermal
biomaterial fibroblasts (CCD966SK)
applications grown
[16]. Thus, the for
cytotoxicity
48 h under different culture conditions (control group, 5% DMSO, and CMC/PVA/CO
of the prepared CMC/PVA/CO composite films was evaluated using the MTT assay. The
composite
dermal film immersion
fibroblasts culturedmedium)
in theare presented in Figure
CMC/PVA/CO 6. As shown
composite in Figure 6A,
film immersion hu-
medium
cell morphology
man dermal
and cell
fibroblasts
viability
cultured
of human dermal fibroblasts (CCD966SK) grown for 48
show good growth and healthyinmorphologies
the CMC/PVA/CO with composite
minimal cellfilmapoptosis
immersioncompared
medium to
h under
show different culture conditions (control group, 5% DMSO, and CMC/PVA/CO to com-
the 5%good
DMSO growth andBased
group. healthyonmorphologies
the MTT assay with minimal
data, all of cell
the apoptosis
CMC/PVA/CO compared
composite
posite
the 5%film immersion
DMSOcomparable medium)
group. Based are presented
on the MTT assay in Figure
data, 6. As shown
all of the CMC/PVA/CO in Figure 6A,
compositehuman
films exhibit biocompatibility and non-toxicity. Thus, these composite films
films exhibit comparable biocompatibility and non-toxicity. Thus, these composite films are
are suitable candidates for further tissue engineering and wound-healing applications. It
suitable candidates for further tissue engineering and wound-healing applications. It has
has been reported that CMC/PVA films can absorb wound fluid through ion exchange,
been reported that CMC/PVA films can absorb wound fluid through ion exchange, which
which enhances tissue formation, regeneration, and rapid epithelialization [5].
enhances tissue formation, regeneration, and rapid epithelialization [5].
Figure 6. Biocompatibility evaluation of the CMC/PVA/CO composite films with different concen-
Figure 6. Biocompatibility evaluation of the CMC/PVA/CO composite films with different concen-
trations of CO (0.0%, 0.1%, 1%, 2.5%, 4%, and 5%) using the MTT assay. (A,B) Average cell viability
trations of CO (0.0%, 0.1%, 1%, 2.5%, 4%, and 5%) using the MTT assay. (A,B) Average cell viability
values among the control, 5% DMSO, and composite films. Results are expressed as mean ± standard
values among the control, 5% DMSO, and composite films. Results are expressed as mean ± stand-
deviation and statistical significance is represented as (*) p < 0.05 or (**) p < 0.01.
ard deviation and statistical significance is represented as (*) p < 0.05 or (**) p < 0.01.
7. Inhibitory
Figure 7.
Figure Inhibitoryeffects of of
effects CMC/PVA/CO
CMC/PVA/CO composite
compositefilmsfilms
with with
different concentrations
different of CO of CO
concentrations
(0.0%, 0.1%,
(0.0%, 0.1%, 1%,
1%,2.5%,
2.5%,4%,4%,andand5%) on on
5%) the the
growth of (A)
growth ofGram-positive bacteria
(A) Gram-positive (Staphylococcus
bacteria (Staphylococcus
aureus) and (B) Gram-negative bacteria (Escherichia coli). Results are expressed
aureus) and (B) Gram-negative bacteria (Escherichia coli). Results are expressed as mean as mean ± standard
± standard
deviation and statistical significance is represented as (*) p < 0.05 or (**) p <
deviation and statistical significance is represented as (*) p < 0.05 or (**) p < 0.01.0.01.
4. Conclusions
4. Conclusions
In the present study, CMC/PVA composite films containing various CO concentrations
In1%,
(0.1%, the2.5%,
present
4%, study,
and 5%)CMC/PVA
were developedcomposite
using afilms containing
simple various
solution casting CO concentra-
technique.
tions (0.1%, 1%, 2.5%,
The morphological, 4%, and
physical, 5%) were
mechanical, developedbiological,
hydrophilic, using a simple solution casting
and antibacterial prop- tech-
erties of the CMC/PVA composite films were affected by CO incorporation.
nique. The morphological, physical, mechanical, hydrophilic, biological, and antibacterial The pure
CMC/PVAof
properties composite film had
the CMC/PVA smooth morphology
composite films were and homogenous
affected appearance, but
by CO incorporation. The pure
CO incorporation resulted in a rough surface and irregular structure, especially regarding
CMC/PVA composite film had smooth morphology and homogenous appearance, but CO
the CMC/PVA/CO-5% composite film. XRD and FTIR results indicate that CO incorpo-
incorporation resulted in a rough surface and irregular structure, especially regarding the
ration does not change the structure of the film matrix. Results regarding the mechanical
CMC/PVA/CO-5%
properties revealed composite
that tensile film. XRD
strength andand FTIR results
elongation indicate
rate upon the that CO incorporation
breaking of the
does not change
composite the structure
films were influencedofbytheCOfilm matrix. Results
incorporation. Theregarding
addition of the
COmechanical
caused a prop-
erties revealed
decrease that tensile
in mechanical strength
strength, whileandtheelongation rate uponcomposite
CMC/PVA/CO-2.5% the breakingfilmsofmain-
the compo-
site films
tained were influenced
approximately 65% of bytensile
CO incorporation.
strength and 80%Theof addition of CO
elongation ratecaused
at break.a decrease
All in
composite films
mechanical showed
strength, goodthe
while hydrophilicity and that they
CMC/PVA/CO-2.5% were biocompatible
composite towardsapprox-
films maintained
the proliferation
imately and growth
65% of tensile of fibroblast
strength and 80%cells. All concentrations
of elongation of CO were
rate at break. effective films
All composite
against Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli when compared to the pure CMC/PVA
showed good hydrophilicity and that they were biocompatible towards the proliferation
film. Finally, the improved physicochemical, biological, and antibacterial properties of the
and growth of fibroblast cells. All concentrations of CO were effective against Staphylo-
CMC/PVA/CO-2.5% composite films were found to be beneficial for further biomedical
coccus aureus and applications.
and wound-healing Escherichia coli when compared to the pure CMC/PVA film. Finally,
the improved physicochemical, biological, and antibacterial properties of the
Author Contributions: Conceptualization, W.-H.H. and C.-Y.H.; Methodology, C.-Y.H.; Software,
W.-H.H. and C.-Y.H.; Validation, W.-H.H. and C.-Y.H.; Formal analysis, W.-H.H., C.-Y.H. and I.-
T.L.; Investigation, W.-H.H. and I.-T.L.; Resources, P.-C.C.; Data curation, C.-Y.H., P.-C.C. and S.-
W.F.; Writing—original draft, Y.-H.C. and S.-W.F.; Writing—review and editing, Y.-H.C. and S.-W.F.;
Visualization, H.L., P.-C.L. and S.-W.F.; Supervision, P.-C.L., Y.-H.C. and S.-W.F.; Project administration,
H.L. and S.-W.F.; Funding acquisition, H.L. and S.-W.F. All authors have read and agreed to the
published version of the manuscript.
Polymers 2023, 15, 1454 11 of 13
Funding: This research was funded by Pro Hallmarks Taiwan Ltd., grant number A-108-040; MacKay
Memorial Hospital, grant number MMH-111-99; and the Ministry of Science and Technology of
Taiwan, grant number 107-2218-E-992-001-MY2.
Institutional Review Board Statement: Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement: The data presented in this study are available upon request from the
corresponding author.
Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
1. Brumberg, V.; Astrelina, T.; Malivanova, T.; Samoilov, A. Modern Wound Dressings: Hydrogel Dressings. Biomedicines 2021, 9,
1235. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
2. Freytag, C.; Odermatt, E.K. Standard Biocompatibility Studies Do Not Predict All Effects of PVA/CMC Anti-Adhesive Gel in vivo.
Eur. Surg. Res. 2016, 56, 109–122. [CrossRef]
3. Feng, R.; Fu, R.; Duan, Z.; Zhu, C.; Ma, X.; Fan, D.; Li, X. Preparation of sponge-like macroporous PVA hydrogels via n-HA
enhanced phase separation and their potential as wound dressing. J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed. 2018, 29, 1463–1481. [CrossRef]
4. Falbo, F.; Spizzirri, U.G.; Restuccia, D.; Aiello, F. Natural Compounds and Biopolymers-Based Hydrogels Join Forces to Promote
Wound Healing. Pharmaceutics 2023, 15, 271. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
5. Kanikireddy, V.; Varaprasad, K.; Jayaramudu, T.; Karthikeyan, C.; Sadiku, R. Carboxymethyl cellulose-based materials for
infection control and wound healing: A review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 164, 963–975. [CrossRef]
6. Zennifer, A.; Senthilvelan, P.; Sethuraman, S.; Sundaramurthi, D. Key advances of carboxymethyl cellulose in tissue engineering
& 3D bioprinting applications. Carbohydr. Polym. 2021, 256, 117561. [PubMed]
7. Javanbakht, S.; Shaabani, A. Carboxymethyl cellulose-based oral delivery systems. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 133, 21–29.
[CrossRef]
8. Pornpitchanarong, C.; Rojanarata, T.; Opanasopit, P.; Ngawhirunpat, T.; Bradley, M.; Patrojanasophon, P. Maleimide-
functionalized car boxymethyl cellulose: A novel mucoadhesive polymer for transmucosal drug delivery. Carbohydr. Polym. 2022,
288, 119368. [CrossRef]
9. Basu, P.; Narendrakumar, U.; Arunachalam, R.; Devi, S.; Manjubala, I. Characterization and Evaluation of Carboxymethyl
Cellulose-Based Films for Healing of Full-Thickness Wounds in Normal and Diabetic Rats. ACS Omega 2018, 3, 12622–12632.
[CrossRef]
10. Wang, B.; Yang, X.; Qiao, C.; Li, Y.; Li, T.; Xu, C. Effects of chitosan quaternary ammonium salt on the physicochemical properties
of sodium carboxymethyl cellulose-based films. Carbohydr. Polym. 2018, 184, 37–46. [CrossRef]
11. Lin, D.; Zheng, Y.; Wang, X.; Huang, Y.; Ni, L.; Chen, X.; Wu, Z.; Huang, C.; Yi, Q.; Li, J.; et al. Study on physicochemical
properties, antioxidant and antimicrobial activity of okara soluble dietary fiber/sodium carboxymethyl cellulose/thyme essential
oil active edible composite films incorporated with pectin. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 165, 1241–1249. [CrossRef]
12. Bahrami, A.; Fattahi, R. Biodegradable carboxymethyl cellulose-polyvinyl alcohol composite incorporated with Glycyrrhiza Glabra
L. essential oil: Physicochemical and antibacterial features. Food Sci. Nutr. 2021, 9, 4974–4985. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
13. Gaaz, T.S.; Sulong, A.B.; Akhtar, M.N.; Kadhum, A.A.; Mohamad, A.B.; Al-Amiery, A.A. Properties and Applications of Polyvinyl
Alcohol, Halloysite Nanotubes and Their Nanocomposites. Molecules 2015, 20, 22833–22847. [CrossRef]
14. Kumar, A.; Sood, A.; Han, S.S. Poly(vinyl alcohol)-alginate as potential matrix for various applications: A focused review.
Carbohydr. Polym. 2022, 277, 118881. [CrossRef]
15. Zhu, J.; Li, Q.; Che, Y.; Liu, X.; Dong, C.; Chen, X.; Wang, C. Effect of Na2 CO3 on the Microstructure and Macroscopic Properties
and Mechanism Analysis of PVA/CMC Composite Film. Polymers 2020, 12, 453. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
16. Alsahag, M.; Alisaac, A.; Al-Hazmi, G.A.A.; Pashameah, R.A.; Attar, R.M.S.; Saad, F.A.; El-Metwaly, N.M. Preparation of
carboxymethyl cellulose/polyvinyl alcohol wound dressing composite immobilized with anthocyanin extract for colorimetric
monitoring of wound healing and prevention of wound infection. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 224, 233–242. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
17. Fasihi, H.; Fazilati, M.; Hashemi, M.; Noshirvani, N. Novel carboxymethyl cellulose-polyvinyl alcohol blend films stabilized by
Pickering emulsion incorporation method. Carbohydr. Polym. 2017, 167, 79–89. [CrossRef]
18. Parham, S.; Kharazi, A.Z.; Bakhsheshi-Rad, H.R.; Nur, H.; Ismail, A.F.; Sharif, S.; RamaKrishna, S.; Berto, F. Antioxidant,
Antimicrobial and Antiviral Properties of Herbal Materials. Antioxidants 2020, 9, 1309. [CrossRef]
19. Zubair, M.; Shahzad, S.; Hussain, A.; Pradhan, R.A.; Arshad, M.; Ullah, A. Current Trends in the Utilization of Essential Oils for
Polysaccharide- and Protein-Derived Food Packaging Materials. Polymers 2022, 14, 1146. [CrossRef]
20. Cazzola, M.; Ferraris, S.; Allizond, V.; Bertea, C.M.; Novara, C.; Cochis, A.; Geobaldo, F.; Bistolfi, A.; Cuffini, A.M.;
Rimondini, L.; et al. Grafting of the peppermint essential oil to a chemically treated Ti6Al4V alloy to counteract the bacterial
adhesion. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2019, 378, 125011. [CrossRef]
21. Nicolaus, C.; Junghanns, S.; Hartmann, A.; Murillo, R.; Ganzera, M.; Merfort, I. In vitro studies to evaluate the wound healing
properties of Calendula officinalis extracts. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2017, 196, 94–103. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Polymers 2023, 15, 1454 12 of 13
22. Balciunaitiene, A.; Puzeryte, V.; Radenkovs, V.; Krasnova, I.; Memvanga, P.B.; Viskelis, P.; Streimikyte, P.; Viskelis, J. Sustainable-
Green Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles Using Aqueous Hyssopus officinalis and Calendula officinalis Extracts and Their Antioxi-
dant and Antibacterial Activities. Molecules 2022, 27, 7700. [CrossRef]
23. Miguel, M.; Barros, L.; Pereira, C.; Calhelha, R.C.; Garcia, P.A.; Castro, M.; Santos-Buelga, C.; Ferreira, I.C. Chemical characteriza-
tion and bioactive properties of two aromatic plants: Calendula officinalis L. (flowers) and Mentha cervina L. (leaves). Food Funct.
2016, 7, 2223–2232. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
24. Butnariu, M.; Coradini, C.Z. Evaluation of Biologically Active Compounds from Calendula officinalis Flowers using Spectropho-
tometry. Chem. Cent. J. 2012, 6, 35. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
25. Alexandre, J.T.M.; Sousa, L.H.T.; Lisboa, M.R.P.; Furlaneto, F.A.C.; do Val, D.R.; Marques, M.; Vasconcelos, H.C.; de Melo, I.M.;
Leitão, R.; Castro Brito, G.A.; et al. Anti-inflammatory and antiresorptive effects of Calendula officinalis on inflammatory bone loss
in rats. Clin. Oral Investig. 2018, 22, 2175–2185. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
26. Cruceriu, D.; Balacescu, O.; Rakosy, E. Calendula officinalis: Potential Roles in Cancer Treatment and Palliative Care. Integr. Cancer
Ther. 2018, 17, 1068–1078. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
27. Givol, O.; Kornhaber, R.; Visentin, D.; Cleary, M.; Haik, J.; Harats, M. A systematic review of Calendula officinalis extract for wound
healing. Wound Repair Regen. 2019, 27, 548–561. [CrossRef]
28. Pedram Rad, Z.; Mokhtari, J.; Abbasi, M. Calendula officinalis extract/PCL/Zein/Gum arabic nanofibrous bio-composite scaffolds
via suspension, two-nozzle and multilayer electrospinning for skin tissue engineering. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 135, 530–543.
[CrossRef]
29. Chan, Y.H.; Lew, W.Z.; Lu, E.; Loretz, T.; Lu, L.; Lin, C.T.; Feng, S.W. An evaluation of the biocompatibility and osseointegration
of novel glass fiber reinforced composite implants: In vitro and in vivo studies. Dent. Mater. 2018, 34, 470–485. [CrossRef]
30. Chu, Y.; Xu, T.; Gao, C.; Liu, X.; Zhang, N.; Feng, X.; Liu, X.; Shen, X.; Tang, X. Evaluations of physicochemical and biological
properties of pullulan-based films incorporated with cinnamon essential oil and Tween 80. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 122,
388–394. [CrossRef]
31. Chan, Y.H.; Ho, K.N.; Lee, Y.C.; Chou, M.J.; Lew, W.Z.; Huang, H.M.; Lai, P.C.; Feng, S.W. Melatonin enhances osteogenic
differentiation of dental pulp mesenchymal stem cells by regulating MAPK pathways and promotes the efficiency of bone
regeneration in calvarial bone defects. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2022, 13, 73. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
32. El Fawal, G.F.; Abu-Serie, M.M.; Hassan, M.A.; Elnouby, M.S. Hydroxyethyl cellulose hydrogel for wound dressing: Fabrication,
characterization and in vitro evaluation. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 111, 649–659. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
33. Verma, N.; Pramanik, K.; Singh, A.K.; Biswas, A. Design of magnesium oxide nanoparticle incorporated carboxy methyl
cellulose/poly vinyl alcohol composite film with novel composition for skin tissue engineering. Mater. Technol. 2022, 37, 706–716.
[CrossRef]
34. Sethi, V.; Kaur, M.; Thakur, A.; Rishi, P.; Kaushik, A. Unravelling the role of hemp straw derived cellulose in CMC/PVA hydrogel
for sustained release of fluoroquinolone antibiotic. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2022, 222, 844–855. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
35. Saadiah, M.A.; Zhang, D.; Nagao, Y.; Muzakir, S.K.; Samsudin, A.S. Reducing crystallinity on thin film based CMC/PVA hybrid
polymer for application as a host in polymer electrolytes. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 2019, 511, 201–211. [CrossRef]
36. Deshmukh, R.K.; Akhila, K.; Ramakanth, D.; Gaikwad, K.K. Guar gum/carboxymethyl cellulose based antioxidant film
incorporated with halloysite nanotubes and litchi shell waste extract for active packaging. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2022, 15, 1–13.
[CrossRef]
37. Amaregouda, Y.; Kamanna, K.; Gasti, T.; Kumbar, V. Enhanced Functional Properties of Biodegradable Polyvinyl Alco-
hol/Carboxymethyl Cellulose (PVA/CMC) Composite Films Reinforced with L-alanine Surface Modified CuO Nanorods.
J. Polym. Environ. 2022, 30, 2559–2578. [CrossRef]
38. Song, X.; Zuo, G.; Chen, F. Effect of essential oil and surfactant on the physical and antimicrobial properties of corn and wheat
starch films. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 107 Pt A, 1302–1309. [CrossRef]
39. Hashmi, M.; Ullah, S.; Ullah, A.; Akmal, M.; Saito, Y.; Hussain, N.; Ren, X.; Kim, I.S. Optimized Loading of Carboxymethyl
Cellulose (CMC) in Tri-component Electrospun Nanofibers Having Uniform Morphology. Polymers 2020, 12, 2524. [CrossRef]
40. Rao, K.M.; Sudhakar, K.; Suneetha, M.; Won, S.Y.; Han, S.S. Fungal-derived carboxymethyl chitosan blended with polyvinyl
alcohol as membranes for wound dressings. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 190, 792–800. [CrossRef]
41. Fathi, A.; Khanmohammadi, M.; Goodarzi, A.; Foroutani, L.; Mobarakeh, Z.T.; Saremi, J.; Arabpour, Z.; Ai, J. Fabrication of
chitosan-polyvinyl alcohol and silk electrospun fiber seeded with differentiated keratinocyte for skin tissue regeneration in
animal wound model. J. Biol. Eng. 2020, 14, 27. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
42. Darbasizadeh, B.; Fatahi, Y.; Feyzi-Barnaji, B.; Arabi, M.; Motasadizadeh, H.; Farhadnejad, H.; Moraffah, F.; Rabiee, N. Crosslinked-
polyvinyl alcohol-carboxymethyl cellulose/ZnO nanocomposite fibrous mats containing erythromycin (PVA-CMC/ZnO-EM):
Fabrication, characterization and in-vitro release and anti-bacterial properties. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 141, 1137–1146.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
Polymers 2023, 15, 1454 13 of 13
43. Kharat, Z.; Amiri Goushki, M.; Sarvian, N.; Asad, S.; Dehghan, M.M.; Kabiri, M. Chitosan/PEO nanofibers containing Calendula
officinalis extract: Preparation, characterization, in vitro and in vivo evaluation for wound healing applications. Int. J. Pharm.
2021, 609, 121132. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
44. Barbieri, R.; Coppo, E.; Marchese, A.; Daglia, M.; Sobarzo-Sánchez, E.; Nabavi, S.F.; Nabavi, S.M. Phytochemicals for human
disease: An update on plant-derived compounds antibacterial activity. Microbiol. Res. 2017, 196, 44–68. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual
author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to
people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.