Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Analytical Luminescence: Its Potential in The Clinical Laboratory
Analytical Luminescence: Its Potential in The Clinical Laboratory
The various types of chemiluminescent and bioluminescent to reduce the quantities of specimen and reagent required in
reactions are described. Applications of luminescence in the initial enzymatic step, thus reducing the cost of the assay.
the analysis of substances of clinical interest are surveyed. The second major application of luminescence is the utiliza-
The advantages, disadvantages, and prospects for lumi- tion of luminescent molecules as replacements for radioactive
nescent assays are discussed. labels in immunoassay.
An important feature of luminescence as an analytical
Additional Keyphrases: chemiluminescence biolumi- -
technique is that its usefulness is not confined to clinical
nescence analytical applications in the clinical labora-
-
chemistry. During the next few years we believe it will find an
tory luminescent immunoassays immobilized re-
-
increasing role in other pathology disciplines, e.g., hematology,
agents -luminescent conjugates luminometer (lumi-
#{149}
immunology, bacteriology, and pharmacology.
nescence measuring device)
Terminology and Definitions
Chemiluminescence may be simply defined as the chemical
introduction production of light. In the literature it is often confused with
fluorescence. The difference between these two processes is
The Place of Luminescence Assays in Clinical the source of the energy that is producing molecules in an
Chemistry excited state. In chemiluminescence this is the energy of a
The clinical chemist is involved in measuring a variety of chemical reaction, and the decay from the excited state back
substances by many different analytical techniques. Although to the ground state is accompanied by emission of light (lu-
different, these techniques share the common principle of an minescence). In contrast, incident radiation is the source of
interface between chemistry and physics. The most commonly the energy that, in fluorescence, promotes molecules to an
used such interface in clinical chemistry is absorptiometry, excited state. Analytically, the types of luminescence that have
both at visible and ultraviolet wavelengths, but emission flame engendered the most interest are chemiluminescence and
photometry and radioactivity are also commonly used. A novel bioluminescence. The latter is the name given to a special form
interface technique, so far relatively unexplored in clinical of chemiluminescence found in biological systems, in which
chemistry, is luminescence. a catalytic protein increases the efficiency of the luminescent
Analyses based on the measurement of emitted light offer reaction. Indeed, in certain cases the reaction is impossible
several advantages over conventional techniques: high sen- without a protein component.
sitivity, wide linear range, low cost per test, and relatively
simple and inexpensive equipment. Historical Aspects
Luminescence is expected to make an impact in two main Luminescence of various types has almost certainly been
areas of clinical analysis. Firstly, it may have an important role known to man since ancient times. For example, Aristotle
as a replacement for conventional colorimetric or spectro- (384-322 B.C.) described the BL1 of dead fish (bacteria) and
photometric indicator reactions in assays for substrates of fungi in his De Anima. After Robert Boyle’s discovery that
oxidases and dehydrogenases. In this type of assay the sensi- oxygen was intimately involved, little further progress was
tivity of the luminescence indicator reaction may be used ei- made in studies of BL until the nineteenth century with the
ther to quantitate substrates not easily measured by con- pioneering work of Dubois (1) on the BL of firefly and clam
ventional techniques (e.g., prostaglandins and vitamins) or extracts. In contrast to BL, the history of CL, especially that
in the aqueous phase, is remarkably short. The fortuitous
discovery of lophine (2) and pyrogallol (3) were the first ex-
Department of Clinical Chemistry, Wolfson Research Laboratories, amples in solution. The important CL substances, luminol and
Queen Elizabeth Medical Centre, Birmingham B15 2TH, U.K.
lucigenin, were discovered in 1928 (4) and 1935 (5), respec-
It has not escaped our notice that we printed a review on this topic
in a recent issue [Clin. (‘hem. 25,512-520 (1979)1; however, we believe tively.
this review article is complementary to the first, in a research area that
is receiving increasing attention, as evidenced by the other papers ofl
this subject in this same issue.-Ed. Nonstandard abbreviations used: BL, bioluminescent or biolu-
Received Mar. 7, 1979; accepted Apr. 4, 1979. minescence; CL, chemiluminescent or chemiluminescence.
Advantages and Disadvantages of Luminescence The CL reactions described in this section all have the
and Luminescent Assays common feature of being hydrogen peroxide detectors. This
makes them of particular interest to the clinical chemist, be-
Sensitivity. Of the several advantages of luminescent
cause they offer an alternative to the colorimetric peroxide
methods over their conventional counterparts, their extreme
detection methods now used in many clinical assays. The
sensitivity is the most important. For example, as compared quantum efficiency of CL is often very low; e.g., for luminol
with spectrophotometry, the BL assay of NADH is estimated it ranges from 0.01 to 0.05 (13). However, the development of
to be some 25 000-fold more sensitive (7), and BL assays for sensitive photomultipliers has made it possible to follow very
glucose and alcohol are, respectively, 55- and 10-fold more weak luminescence, even when the quantum efficiency is as
sensitive than conventional assays (8). The minimal detect- low as 1015 (13).
able concentration for an assay ultimately depends on how Today many CL systems are known, but despite intensive
sensitively light can be detected, and on the quantum effi- studies the detailed mechanisms involved are often obscure.3
ciency2 () of the reaction. Generally BL reactions are much CL, albeit very weak, is stated to be a virtually universal
more efficient than CL reactions; typical quantum efficiencies property of oxidizable organic substances (14).
are in the ranges 0.1-0.8 and 0.01-0.05, respectively. Detection CL can occur in the gas, solid, or liquid phase; however, only
limits for the luminescent assay of ATP, NADH, and H202 liquid-phase CL, which appears to be the most useful for ap-
are reported to be 10b0 mol (7), 1016 mol (7), and i0 mol/L plication to clinical chemistry, will be considered here. The
(9-11). mechanism of organic CL in solution involves three stages
Range of linear response. Since CL is an emission process (19): (a) preliminary reactions to provide the key intermedi-
(as opposed to absorption), response is usually linearly pro- ate, (b) an excitation step in which the chemical energy of the
portional to concentration from the minimal detectable con- key intermediate is converted into electronic excitation en-
centration up to the point where it is no longer possible to ergy, and (c) emission of light from the excited product formed
maintain an excess of other reactants relative to the analyte. in the chemical reaction. In reactions in which a fluorescent
In the case of ATP assay by the firefly reaction, response is compound is added to enhance the CL emission, an efficient
linear over six orders of magnitude (12). energy transfer occurs and the resulting CL is known as
Speed of analysis. This largely depends on the type of lu- “sensitized CL.”
minescent reaction. In some instances a rapid flash is obtained Diacylhydrazides. The CL of a cyclic diacylhydrazide, lu-
(<1 s), the peak height of which may be related to analyte minol (5-amino-2,3-dihydro-1,4-phthalazinedione), was first
concentration; in other cases a more protracted glow occurs described by Albrecht in 1928 (4). Since then, many acylhy-
with a time course lasting several minutes. In the latter case drazides have been checked for their ability to luminesce, but
the integral or partial integral of the light-time curve has been strong CL is obtained only from cyclic diacylhydrazides of the
used as a measure of analyte concentration because it is much same type as luminol. A shift in the position of the amino
less sensitive to mixing efficiency, but this drastically reduces group reduces efficiency; e.g., isoluminol (6-amino-2,3-dihy-
the through-put and speed of analysis. drophthalazine-7,4-dione) is 10% as efficient as luminol (20).
Cost. The major cost benefit of luminescent assays arises Substitution in the ring structure markedly influences the
from their extreme sensitivity, which allows assays to be luminescence. Electron-withdrawing (electrophilic) substit-
performed with much less reagents, hence reducing the cost uents in the benzene ring decrease luminescence, but elec-
per test. For example, luminescence offers a means of reducing tron-donating (electrophobic) substitutents increase light
the cost of cholesterol assays involving cholesterol oxidase (EC yield, substitution at positions 5 and 8 being more effective
1.1.3.6), because the sensitivity of CL detection of peroxide than at 6 and 7. A complete loss of light occurs if the hetero-
allows the initial peroxide-producing reaction involving cyclic ring is substituted. Annelated analogs of luminol have
cholesterol oxidase to be scaled down. been produced that are 300% more efficient than luminol (15,
Specificity. Specificity is conferred on BL and CL by using 20) (see Figure 1). The efficiency, wavelength, and pH opti-
the luminescence as an indicator reaction coupled to inter- mum of light emission in luminol depend greatly on reaction
mediates (such as ATP, NADH, and H202) produced enzy- conditions. In general, hydrogen peroxide is the most com-
matically. Generally, BL reactions are specific because they monly used oxidant; catalysts include Fe(CN6) and Cu2
are enzymic processes, but CL reactions are nonspecific. Lu- (10). Other oxidants used include hypochlorite, iodine, per-
minol, for example, will undergo a CL reaction with various manganate, and oxygen in the presence of a suitable catalyst.
oxidants (oxygen, peroxide, superoxide, iodine) and its reac- Perhaps the most efficient catalyst in this reaction is heme,
tions are subject to interferences by reducing agents such as and the best medium would appear to be carbonate buffer
uric acid. (21). The optimum pH for CL varies somewhat with the cat-
Mechanisms. A disadvantage of both CL arid BL systems alyst and oxidant, but that for most oxidizing systems is near
is that in many instances the reaction mechanism is incom- pH 11. The luminescence of luminol follows the stoichiometry
pletely understood. Thus, it is particularly difficult to control in equation 1 (22), and it has been shown that the amino-
such reactions when they are used in analysis and to predict phthalate ion, which is formed in the singlet excited state, is
or explain analytical interferences. the light emitter in the reaction (23).
Toxicity and stability. CL and ilL reagents present no
known hazard to the environment. CL reagents (e.g., luminol) Equation
are stable and have been used as non-toxic, stable alternatives
Mo_
to radio and enzyme labels in immunoassay. BL reagents such 1uinoI + 5202 - 1L..._:::ico;
light+ (425 n)
as luciferase suffer from the same stability problems as many $5.
2 Quantum efficiency, = the number (or rate) of molecules lu- The reader is referred to several reviews (1.5-18) for further in-
minescing/the number (or rate) of molecules reacting. formation on studies of CL mechanisms.
Equation 3 cs
1_H. 11.11112 Loo1 An ..1. of .rn.1..d Loci.ni.
1,Ao.o1 Anriv.ti*
1NH2. 1.H I.o-1Lno1
TCFO + 5202 - ClOC0.C0.00H + Cs5l0H
(I) (II)
0-0
\ ,.Sjl
H_f’
s
I.o_ [ciI$oco_}. F’ - F + light
luciferase
BL - 1
FMNH2 + RCHO + 02 FMN + RCO2H + light
where:
(b) Adenine-nucleotide linked
e.g., Photinius (firefly) 502H
luciferase
Luciferin + ATP + 02 2+ ADP + CO2 + light
HOSS
Ca2+
Precharged protein -e blue-fluorescent protein + light of the most hydrophobic enzymes known (51), and this may
explain its poor solubility. The activity of firefly luciferase
preparations depends greatly on the mode of preparation.
Type d (peroxidation systems) have not as yet found application in clinical Procedures involving precipitation with (NH4)2S04 of fire-
chemistry. fly-lantern extracts give the best preparations, which may be
safely stored at -20 #{176}C (52-54). Enzyme activity has also been
(d) Peroxidation systems stabilized by bovine serum albumin, sucrose, ascorbic acid,
(e) “Precharged” systems or thioethanol (55, 56).
Table 1 gives examples of the most important reaction types Specificity. The reaction is not specific for ATP; other
in terms of applications in clinical chemistry. nucleotides such as cytidine-5’-triphosphate, inosine-5’-tri-
phosphate, and iso-ATP (57) can stimulate light emission.
Firefly. ADP, uridine triphosphate, and guanine triphosphate have
Firefly luminescence undoubtedly has been the most ex- also been shown by some workers to stimulate light emission,
tensively studied BL system. The light-producing reaction but these results are controversial (58-60). Manganese cations
requires the enzyme luciferase, luciferin, Mg2+, ATP, and may replace Mg2 in the reaction (61).
molecular oxygen.4 Numerous reviews deal with the reaction Inhibitors. Certain anions inhibit the reaction: SCN
(18, 40,42-45) and the mechanism now proposed is shown in <1<N03<Br<C1 (62). Anesthetics such as procaine and
Scheme 1 (41, 46-48). The initial reaction is the rapid con- lidocaine are also inhibitors, and this fact has formed the basis
version, in the presence of Mg2+ and ATP, of luciferin to lu- of assays (63).
ciferyl adenylate, which, in the presence of luciferase, com- Marine bacteria.
bines with molecular oxygen to give an oxyluciferyl adenyl- Most studies of luminescent marine bacteria have centered
ate-enzyme complex in the excited state. After emission, the on two types,5 Beneckea harveyi (Photobacterium fischeri
ground-state complex disassociates to form enzyme, AMP, strain MAV) and Vibrio fischeri. Characteristics of the re-
oxyluciferin, and carbon dioxide, the last being derived from action such as kinetics, absolute quantum yields, and emission
the carboxyl group of luciferin. The reaction is best carried spectra vary with the type of bacterium from which the lu-
out at 25#{176}C in glycine buffer pH 7.8 (46). The color of the light ciferase is obtained. The BL quantum yield per enzyme turned
emitted differs for different species of firefly, and this is over, or product formed, is in the range 0.1 to 0.2 (64). Gen-
thought to be due to inter-species differences in the structure erally the emission spectra are characterized by a broad
of luciferase, because the structure of luciferin is identical for emission, with a maximum near 478-505 nm. Recently, how-
all species (49). Intensity and wavelength of maximal emission ever, a yellow-emitting strain of P. fischeri has been described
are also altered by changes in pH, ionic strength, temperature, (65). In vitro, the components required for luminescence are
and the presence of chlorides of Zn2+ or Cd2+ (50). FMNH2 generated from FMN by the oxidation of NADH or
Luciferase. Firefly luciferase is a dimer, each sub-unit NADPH with the aid of FMN reductase, a long-chain ali-
having a relative tholecular mass of 50000. Only one of the
sub-units exhibits enzyme activity in the BL reaction. Studies
of its amino acid composition have shown luciferase to be one The nomenclature of the various luminescent marine bacteria has
not been fully settled (see ref. 64 for fuller details). Three general
groups have been recognized, based on mode of flagellation, guanine
Lucife,-ase--a generic term referring to an enzyme that catalyzes + cytosine content of the DNA, and DNA/DNA and DNA/RNA hy-
the oxidation of a substrate, such as luciferin, with light emission. bridization studies. Group A: Vibrio fischeri or Photobacterium [is-
Luciferin-a generic term referring to a reduced compound that can then or Achnomobacter fischeri. Group B: Photobactenium phos-
be oxidized in an appropriate environment to produce an electroni- phoreum and Photobacterium leiognathi. Group C: (a) Beneckea
cally excited singlet state; light is produced on its return to the ground harveyi or Lucibactenium harveyi or P. fisheri MAy, (b) Beneckea
state. - ,splendida, and (c) Vibrio cholerae.
E-FMNH
0H
(intermediate II) dar1c” reaction
RCHO
E-FMNH2 E + FMN + H202
(intermediate I)
E-FMNH
7citerase)
FMNH2 RCHO
/\ OOH
(Intermediate IIA)
FMNreductase\ H0 RCOOH
NADH2
FMN E-FMN . HOH*
-* light
E-FMN . HOH
I
E + FMN + H20
(modified from 64 and 66)
phatic aldehyde, oxygen, and bacterial luciferase. The pro- Luciferase contains between 12 and 15 sulfhydryl groups,
posed sequence, intermediates, and alternative pathways are and luciferase from Beneckea harveyi has a reactive sulfhy-
presented in Scheme 2. The total light produced in the reac- dryl group on the a-subunit, at or near the active center (74).
tion is proportional to the amount of each of the substrates Treatment of bacterial luciferase with 8 mol/L urea or 5 mol/L
(02, FMNH2, and RCHO) when they are present in limiting guanidine hydrochloride leads to separation of the subunits
quantities. The same can be said of the luciferase because and rapid loss of activity. The subunits can be recombined and
excess FMNH2 is auto-oxidized so rapidly as compared with the activity recovered, but this recovery is absolutely depen-
the rate of light emission that FMNH2 has been reconverted dent on keeping the sulfhydryl groups reduced (75).
to FMN by the time the luciferase finishes its catalytic cycle. pH profile. The two luciferases show different pH profiles.
Thus, like the other reactants, the luciferase only acts once Vibrio fischeri luciferase shows a broad profile with nearly
in the in vitro reaction. It is, however, capable of turnover on optimal activity over the pH range 6.4-7.2. Beneckea harveyi
repeated addition of FMNH2. Although the role of the aIde- luciferase shows a quite different response, having its opti-
hyde was not understood for a long time, it is now established mum (measured by use of the initial maximal light intensity)
that it is oxidized to the corresponding carboxylic acid (64). in the region pH 5.6-6.8, declining sharply at higher values
Various induced mutants of Beneckea harueyi are known (64). (70). In both these cases the luciferase was assayed directly
These show altered BL properties, such as color of light by use of FMNH2. The pH profile obtained by an indirect
emission, temperature sensitivity, and luciferase turnover rate. assay involving the use of NADH (FMNH2 being provided via
Recently, a dim mutant requiring myristic acid (67, 68) and FMN reductase) exhibits a sharp optimum at pH 6.8 that
a nonluminous mutant that only produces light in the pres- reflects the response of the two enzymes (70).
ence of cAMP have been described (69), but their analytical Stability. Thermal-stability studies in which the enzyme
potential has not yet been fully explored. is incubated at various temperatures for 5 mm and the residual
Luciferase. Although luciferases from different strains have enzymic activity determined have shown that luciferase ac-
similar requirements and appear to involve similar reaction tivity begins to lessen between 25 and 35 #{176}C (76), presumably
pathways, the occurrence of two distinctly different luciferases because of heat-denaturation of the enzyme. At 40 #{176}C this
have been reported (70). The luciferases from Vibrio fischeri process takes just a few minutes. Heat-denatured luciferase
and Beneckea harveyi have been shown to be heteropolymers may be reactivated by dissolving it in 8 mol/L urea and di-
(Mr 79 000) composed of two non-identical subunits, and luting (75). Luciferase is inactivated by proteases (77), but this
contain no metals or other cofactors (71). The a and i9 sub- is reduced dramatically on binding of FMN, phosphate, or
units of luciferase from these bacteria have relative molecular sulfate anions (78). Phosphate anions appear to have a sta-
masses of 41 000 and 38 000, and 42 000 and 37 000, respec- bilizing effect on luciferase.
tively. No active hybrids are formed between subunits of the Specificity. Luciferase activity is highly specific for
two luciferases, and tryptic peptides of the two luci- FMNH2, but the enzyme also shows weak activity towards
ferases also differ (72). The role of each subunit in the BL other flavins and flavin analogs (79, 80). Only aliphatic al-
reaction appears to be quite different and it has been shown dehydes with a chain length of eight or more carbon atoms are
that the active site is located specifically on the a-subunit. The effective in the luminescent reaction.
role of the fl-subunit still remains to be elucidated, although Inhibitors. Luciferase is particularly sensitive to thiol re-
it is essential for BL activity (73). agents such as p-chloromercuribenzoic acid and to reagents
sensitive alternative to the colorimetric determination of method for vitamin B12, but this has only been successfully
peroxide. For example, the enzymic generation of peroxide applied to pharmaceutical preparations (124). The use of CL
from glucose by glucose oxidase (EC 1.1.3.4) has been coupled in specific binding reactions is discussed below.
to the CL of luminol (9, 122) and the method has been auto- The major disadvantage of the determination of hydrogen
mated by using immobilized enzymes (130). Table 4 lists other peroxide produced by oxidase enzymes with use of luminol is
oxidases and substrates of oxidases determined by this that a high pH is required for light production. A two-stage
method. reaction with a pH change before luminol addition is therefore
A CL technique is also available to determine the reduced required. An alternative analytical manoeuvre, first reported
form of NADH (33), in which NADH reduces oxygen to hy- by Harvey (26) and subsequently by Cormier and Pritchard
drogen peroxide in the presence of methylene blue. The hy- (125) as a model system for the investigation of the BL system
drogen peroxide is then determined by measuring the CL in Balanoglossus, is the use of a peroxidase-like enzyme to
produced from its reaction with excess bis(2,4,6-trichloro- intercede between the H202-producing oxidase and the lu-
phenyl) oxalate in the presence of perylene. This method has minol indicator reaction. This is analogous to the intercession
been used to measure lactate dehydrogenase (EC 1.1.1.27) and of peroxidase in the glucose oxidase method for glucose
is potentially applicable to other assay systems involving
NAD(H).
Certain metal ions catalyze the CL oxidation of luminol and Scheme 5. Measurement of ATP by use of bacterial lumines-
lucigenin (12, 123) under alkaline conditions, and this has cence
formed the basis of CL analyses for trace metals. An important
limitation is that several metal ions may enhance the same CL ATP + NMN-*NAD + pp
reaction, so that separation or masking is required when such
assays are done. The technique has, however, been applied
NAD + malate oxaloacetate + NADH
successfully to the measurement of some metal ions, e.g.,
chromium in biological samples. The catalytic effect of cobalt
on the luminol reaction has been utilized as a sensitive assay NADH + bacterial luciferase system -k light
Hematin io tg 129
Hemoglobin io tg 129 Ag-Eh00d or free + luminogenic co-reactants -* light
Hydrogen peroxide iO mol/L 10
Hypoxanthine 133, 134 LCIA
Lactate 33
dehydrogenase Ag + Ag-CF + Ab ± Ab:Ag + Ab:Ag-CF
Myoglobin 104tg 129
NADH 2 X 1O-1O mol/L33 or free + luminogenic co-reactants - light
Uric acid iO-1O mol/L 135
LEMIT
analysis now commonly used in clinical laboratories (126). In Drug-E + Drug + Ab z± Ab:Drug + Ab:Drug-E
this way, the pH optimum of the light-producing step may be
decreased to a value nearer that of biological systems. The Drug-E
obvious advantages for the quantitation of hydrogen peroxide,
and hence oxido-reductases, seems to have been overlooked Substrate + NAD NADH + product
until recently (127), although this procedure has been used NADH + luminogenic co-reactants -* light
for the sensitive quantitation of enzyme immunoassays (see
below).
Methods based on precharged systems. The specificity of Legend
Aequorea BL for calcium ions provides the basis for a quan- LIA = luminescent immunoassay; LEIA = luminescent en-
titive micromethod that has a detection limit of 100 nmol of zyme immunoassay; LCIA = luminescent cofactor immu-
Ca2+ per liter. The method has been used to study ionized noassay; LEMIT = luminescent enzyme-multiplied immu-
calcium in stimulated muscle fibres, mitochondria, and nerves noassay technique; L = chemi-or bioluminescent substance;
(87, 88, 136-1 38), but when applied to the measurement of E = enzyme; CF = cofactor; luminogenic co-reactants = e.g.,
ionized calcium in serum (139) it appears to overestimate the H2O2 for an LIA where L = luminol; luminol/I-1202 for an
true concentration (140). LEIA where E = peroxidase; firefly luciferase/Mg2 for an
LCIA where CF = ATP; bacterial luciferase/FMN reduc-
Luminescent Immunoassays tase/FMN for an LEMIT where E = a dehydrogenase.
Luminescent substances have been used in immunoassays
and specific protein binding assays (a) directly as labels and assays for enzymes, such as peroxidase (EC 1.11.1.7) are
indirectly for the luminescent quantitation of (b) enzyme and considerably more sensitive than are conventional colorimetric
(c) cofactor-labeled ligands (Scheme 6). Four types of lumi- assays, a factor that has been exploited in the quantitation of
nescent immunoassay have been developed: enzyme conjugates in enzyme immunoassay (Table 6). A lu-
(a) Luminescent immunoassays-immunoassays in which minescent enzyme immunoassay for cortisol involving lumi-
are used luminescent labels such as luminol, isoluminol, lu- nescent quantitation of a peroxidase-cortisol conjugate (145)
ciferase, or the luminol derivative (141) cited as a universal has a sensitivity comparable with that of the radioimmuno-
labeling agent for antigens have been reported by several assay.
groups of workers and are the subject of some patents. Interest (c) Luminescent cof act or immunoassay. Several workers
in such labels is mainly due to their possible role as replace- have recently investigated potentially very useful enzymic
ments for radioactive labels. Compared with radioimmuno- methods for monitoring specific binding reactions, using Ii-
assay, luminescent immunoassay (LIA) has many of the ad- gand-cofactor conjugates quantitated by use of a BL reaction
vantages associated with enzyme immunoassay: the reagents (146-148) (Table 7). The ligand has, for example, been cova-
are cheap and stable, assays are rapid and can be automated, lently coupled to an enzymically active derivative of NAD.
a separation step may not be required, radiation hazards are After reduction with alcohol dehydrogenase (EC 1.1.1.1) and
obviated, and, in addition, these methods may offer the added ethanol, these conjugates can be measured quantitatively by
advantage of very sensitive detection of the label (142). means of light production by Jsing the BL bacterial luciferase
Heterogeneous and homogeneous luminescent immu- system. The light production by ligand-NADH can be in-
noassays have been described (see Table 5). The luminescent hibited by a protein that specifically binds to the ligand; thus
activity of a luminol-IgG conjugate reportedly is unaffected specific binding reactions can be assayed without separating
when bound to an antibody (143). In contrast, the luminescent free and bound labeled ligands. As ATP can be measured in
activity of an isoluminol-biotin conjugate increases 10-fold very low concentrations with firefly luciferase, the possibility
when bound to avidin, a binding protein specific for biotin. of labeling ligands with this cofactor has also been investigated
This enhancement in light output has been ascribed to in- (146).
creased CL efficiency mediated by the protein (144). (d) Luminescent enzyme-multiplied immunoassay
(b) Luminescent enzyme immunoassay-luminescent technique. It has been suggested (149) that considerable cost
Labeled
Type of Detection
substance Label assay Analyte system Sensitivity Ref.
Cortisol peroxidase Double Ab and/ or insolubilized cortisol Iuminol/ 0.02-1 ng 145
Ab techniques/He H202
IgG (anti-SEB) peroxidase CBA/He staphylococcal pyrogallol/ 1 ng 152
fraction enterotoxin B H202
Anti-lgG peroxidase/ immunocytochemical cell surface IgG POL/ 34
glucose glucose! 34
oxidase Iuminol/
peroxidase
peroxidase CBA/He cortisol; insulin 10 pg; 1.2 mU/L 153
Goat anti- peroxidase solid phase anti-HSA; HSA luminol/ 7 X iO diln. of 212
rabbit lgG H202 antiserum; 10 ng
lgG antibody to peroxidase Sindbis virus pyrog 1101! 5 X i0 PFU/mL 213
the virus H202
a SEB, staphylococcal enterotoxinB; P01, Pholas dactylus luciferin; HSA, human serum albumin.
benefit may accrue from the monitoring of EMIT6 by using the zotization reaction, although the enzyme is largely inactivated
NADH-dependent bacterial luminescence system, because during the coupling procedure (8, 120). The properties of
in many cases the enzyme label used is an oxidoreductase. immobilized luciferase with regards to pH-activity profile and
Most of the reports of luminescent immunoassays are pre- optimal substrate concentration are very similar to those of
liminary in nature, and as yet their sensitivity as compared the native enzyme. Moreover, the immobilized luciferase is
with radioimmunoassays has not been fully evaluated. reported to be stable indefinitely when stored at 0 #{176}C (8).
Jablonski and DeLuca (120) used luciferase/FMN reductase,
Immobilized Luminescent Reagents immobilized on glass beads cemented onto a glass rod, in
Immobilized enzymes have assumed an important role as analyses for NADH and NADPH. A single rod was used for
reagents in clinical analysis (154). The application of immo- over 100 consecutive analyses of NADH without apparent loss
bilized bacterial and firefly luciferases in the analysis of co- of activity.
factors, enzymes, and substrates has been explored, and pre- Firefly luciferase has also been immobilized chemically onto
liminary results have been encouraging (Table 8). Bacterial glass beads, but the bound enzyme retained only 0.07-0.16%
luciferase has been linked chemically to glass by using a dia- of its original activity. The pH optimum of the immobilized
enzyme is lower than that’ of the native enzyme and it emits
6 EMIT” is a registered trade name of the Syva Corp., 3181 Porter light with a major peak at 615 nm, as compared with 562 nm
Drive, Palo Alto, CA 94304. for the native enzyme. An assay for ATP in which immobilized
firefly luciferase is used has been developed and the peak light by oxidation of carbohydrate moieties with periodate and the
intensity shown to be linearly related to concentration in the activated IgG was allowed to react with luminol (143, 151).
range 1 X 108 to 1 X 10 mol/L (155). Also of note is the
immobilized analytical system of Freeman and Seitz (127), Applications in Other Pathology Disciplines
described below in greater detail. The analytical applications of BL and CL are not confined
to clinical chemistry.
Preparation of Luminescent Conjugates The need for a rapid, accurate means of counting microbial
Various chemical methods have been used to attach lumi- populations has led to the introduction of BL techniques in
nescent molecules such as luminol and luciferase to proteins microbiology. Although in the most widely applied methods
or solid supports. Bacterial luciferase and FMN reductase the determination of ATP by use of firefly luminescence is
have been coupled chemically to a solid support by using a used (160), it has also been suggested that an alternative ap-
diazo reaction (120, 157) and to anti-IgG by reaction with proach could be the determination of FMN with bacterial BL
glutaraldehyde (34). Similarly, firefly luciferase has been at- (32). Bacteria may also be detected luminescently by heme
tached chemically to a solid support by means of glutaral- protein catalysis of luminol oxidation, but the limit of sensi-
dehyde (155). Both enzymes appear to be very sensitive to tivity of this method is only 10” to i0 viable bacteria per
chemical coupling procedures, especially those involving ly- milliliter (161, 162). BL assays have been used to rapidly
sine, cysteine, and histidine residues, and considerable loss quantitate rapidly bacteriuria (163-167), and automated
of enzyme activity has been encountered (64, 158). techniques are available that require no pre-processing of
Labeling procedures with use of luminol and isoluminol are specimens. This method gives better sensitivity than do
well documented. The luminescent properties of these mol- conventional techniques. A specific advantage of the BL
ecules are not greatly impaired by reaction at the aromatic technique is that it enables a rapid screening of urine samples,
amino group. Indeed, N-alkylation of isoluminol increases so that only positive samples need be examined further for
light yield (20). Luminol has been coupled to insulin by means bacteria! identification and antibiotic-sensitivity testing.
of the bifunctional coupling reagent glutaraldehyde and it has Antibiotic sensitivity can be quickly determined with the
been claimed that other bifuncional coupling reagents (e.g., firefly luciferase system (101, 168-172) by inoculating growth
Woodward’s Reagent K, carbodiimides, cyanogen bromide, media containing various antibiotics with equal aliquots of
and cyanuric chloride) are also effective (151). Alternatively, urine, and incubating at 37 #{176}C.The change in ATP concen-
luminol may be activated by converting the aromatic amino tration with time, relative to a control, is then measured.
group into an isothiocyanate group. Sensitivity patterns can be defined in 30 to 120 mm, de-
More complex procedures have been used to prepare pending on the growth rate of the organisms, and such pat-
biotin-isoluminol (20, 144), glutathione-luminol (159), thy- terns yield fewer false-positive results than with the antibiotic
roxine-isoluminol (150), and thyroxine-aminonaphthylhy- disc-diffusion technique. BL ATP assays can quickly estimate
drazide conjugates (20). bacterial growth, and this technique seems feasible for assay
An important observation in these studies was that covalent of amino acids, carbohydrates, chemotherapeutic agents,
attachment of CL labels to thyroxine leads to a 20- to 50-fold hormones, vitamins, and other nutritional factors by moni-
reduction in their light yields. Increasing the size of the spacer toring the growth of microorganisms that require these com-
group between the label and the thyroxine molecule does not pounds. This approach appears superior to previous bioassay
improve the light yield. The reduction in light yields has been techniques based on turbidimetry, because more nearly ac-
attributed to the presence of iodine atoms, which are known curate measurements are obtained more quickly. A BL ATP
to be efficient fluorescence quenchers (20). The reactive na- assay is available for gentamicin, and an accurate result for
ture of the aromatic amino group of luminol towards al- only 150 tL of serum is available within 4 h (173, 174). The
dehydes forms the basis of a procedure for coupling this technique is potentially applicable to any group of antimi-
molecule to IgG. Free aldehyde groups were generated on IgG crobial agents, and with appropriate modifications it should
(‘02) or excited carbonyl groups produced by ‘02-mediated 2. Radzizewski, B., Untersuchung uber Hydrobenzamid, Amarin und
Lophin. Chem. Ber. 10,70 (1877).
oxidations. The CL produced can be quantitated for the
measurement of metabolic activation after phagocytosis, and 3. Eder. J. M., Phosphorescenzerscheinungen beim Hervorufen von
Gelatineplatten. Photogr. Mitth. 24, 74 (1887).
indirectly to assess nonspecific opsonic activity in human
4. Albrecht, H. 0., Uber die Chemiluminescenz des Aminophthal-
serum. It has also proved possible to detect specific opsonins saurehydrazids. Z. Phys. Chem. 136, 321 (1928).
and classical complement pathway activation. Such CL 5. Gleu, K., and Petsch, W., Die Chemiluminescenz der Dimethyl-
techniques may prove to be a valuable tool in the evaluation diaridyliumsalze. Angew. Chem. 48,57 (1935).
of factors important in the host-defense mechanism. 6. Harvey, E. N., A History of Luminescence from the Earliest Times
until 1900. The American Philosophical Society, Philadelphia, PA
Instrumentation 1957.
Until recently, most luminescence measurements have been 7. Stanley, P. E., Analytical bioluminescent assays using the liquid
made by using either “home-designed” apparatus (89, 103, scintillation spectrometer: A review. In Liquid Scintillation Counting.
113, 148, 201) or commercial equipment modified to meet the M. A. Crook and P. Johnson, Eds., Heyden, London, 1974, pp 253-
271.
peculiar requirements of luminescence. Instruments so
modified include photometers (63, 103, 122), fluorometers 8. Haggerty, C., Jablonski, E., Stay, L., and DeLuca, M., Continuous
monitoring of reactions that produce NADH and NADPH using
(202,203), stopped-flow apparatus (125,204), continuous-flow
immobilized luciferase and oxidoreductases from Beneckea harveyi.
apparatus (33, 115, 202), scintillation counters (104, 118), and Anal. Biochem. 88, 162 (1978).
centrifugal analyzers (205-207). 9. Bostick, D. T., and Hercules, D. M., Quantitative determination
Most such modifications are empirical, and with certain of blood glucose using enzyme induced chemiluminescence of luminol.
exceptions (208-210), few data have been presented that fa- Anal. Chem. 47, 447 (1975).
cilitate a logical approach to the design of luminescence- 10. Seitz, W. R., and Neary, M. P., Chemiluminescence and biolu-
measuring equipment. Moreover, mixing of reactants in these minescence. Anal. Chem. 46, 188A (1974).
instruments is often crude and inefficient, although in many 11. Williams, D.C., Huff, G. G., and Seitz, W. R., Evaluation of per-
instances this is of crucial importance (32), especially to the oxylate chemiluminescence for determination of enzyme generated
reproducibility of the assay. However, a method of assessing peroxide. Anal. Chem. 48, 1003 (1976).
mixing efficiency has recently been described (211). With the 12. Seitz, W. R., and Neary, M. P., Chemiluminescence and biolu-
minescence analysis. Contemp. Topics Anal. Clin. Chem. 1, 49
explosion of interest in luminescent techniques, there has been
(1977).
renewed activity on the part of instrument manufacturers in
13. Isacsson, U., and Wettermark, G., Chemiluminescence in ana-
developing luminescence-measuring equipment [see Gun.
lytical chemistry. Anal. Chim. Acta 68, 339 (1974).
Chem. 25, 512 (1978)J. A novel and very promising develop-
14. Mendenhall, G. D., Analytical applications of chemiluminescence
ment that may influence luminometer design is the use of Angew. Chem. 16, 225 (1977).
fibre-optic probes. Freeman and Seitz (127) have described 15. McCapra, F., The chemiluminescence of organic compounds. Q.
a CL fibre-optic probe for hydrogen peroxide based on the Rev. (London) 20, 485 (1966).
luminol reaction. Peroxidase, immobilized in a clear polyac- 16. Gundermann, K. D., Chemilumineszenz Organischer Verbin-
rylamide gel, was attached to the end of a fibre-optic probe, dungen. Springer Verlag, New York, NY, 1969.
which was dipped into a stirred light-tight reaction vessel 17. Wilson, T., and Hastings, J. W., Chemical and biological aspects
containing peroxide and an excess of luminol. CL produced of singlet excited molecular oxygen. Photophysiology, 5,50 (1970).
was transmitted by the fibre optic to the detector, a photo- 18. Chemiluminescence and Bioluminescence, M. J. Cormier, D. M.
multiplier tube, which was protected by a shutter when the Hercules, and J. Lee, Eds., Plenum Press, New York, NY, 1973.
fibre optic was not immersed in the reaction vessel. 19. Peng, C. T., Chemiluminescence. In Liquid Scintillation, Science
It is to be expected that the now-established pace of in- and Technology. A. S. Noujaim, C. Ediss, and L. I. Weibe, Eds., Ac-
strument development for the measurement of luminescence ademic Press, New York, NY, 1976, pp 313-330.
will be maintained for some considerable time. It is likely, for 20. Schroeder, H. R., and Yeager, F. M., Chemiluminescence yields
example, that further development in the continuous-flow and detection limits of some isoluminol derivatives i various oxi-
dation systems. Anal. Chem. 50, 1114 (1978).
field will occur, especially in flow-injection analysis, and that
21. White, E. H., and Brundrett, R. B., The chemiluminescence of
very sensitive, fully automated luminescence-measuring
acyl hydrazides. In ref. 18, pp. 231-244.
equipment will soon be available commercially.
22. White, E. H., Zafiriou, 0. C., Kagi, H. M., and Hill, J. H. M.,
Chemilumjnescence of luminol: The chemical reaction. J. Am. Chem.
Luminescent Reagents Soc. 86,940 (1964).
A factor presently hampering the exploitation of lumines- 23. White, E. H., and Bursey, M. M., Chemiluminescence of luminol
cent assays is the quality and availability of CL and BL re- and related hydrazides: The light emission step. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
agents such as luminol and firefly and marine luciferases. CL 86,941 (1964).
136. Shimomura, 0., Johnson, F. H., and Saiga, Y., Microdetermi- 162. Witz, S., and Hartung, W. H., Rapid identification of bacteria
nation of calcium by Aequorin luminescence. Sctence 140, 1339 using chemiluminescence. U.S. Patent 3,959,081 (1976).
(1963). 163. Thore, A., Ansehn, S., Lundin, A., and Bergman, S., Detection
137. Ridgway, E. B., and Ashley, C. C., Calcium transients in single of bacteriuria by luciferase assay of adenosine triphosphate. J. Clin.
muscle fibers. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 68, 339 (1974). Microbiol. 1, 1(1975).
138. Blinks, J. R., Measurement of calcium ion concentrations with 164. Conn, R. B., Charache, P., and Chapelle, E. W., Limits of ap-
photoproteins. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 307,71(1978). plicability of the firefly luminescence ATP assay for the detection of
bacteriain clinicalspecimens. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 63, 493 (1975).
139. Izutsu, K. T., Felton, S. P., Siegel, I. A., et al., Aequorin: Its ionic
specificity. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 9, 1034 (1972). 165. Cutekunst, R. R., The firefly luciferase assay for adenosine tn-
phosphate: A unique procedure for detecting bacteria in urine. In
140. Robertson, W. C., Measurement of ionised calcium in body
ATP-Methodology Seminar, C. Borun, Ed., SAl Technology Co., San
fluids-a review. Ann. Clin. Biochem. 13, 540 (1976).
Diego, CA, 1975, p 358.
141. Pratt, J. J., Woldring, M. C., and Villerius, L. Chemilumines-
cence-linked immunoassay. J. Immunol. Methods 21, 179 (1978). 166. Johnston, H. H., Mitchell, C. J., and Curtis, C. D. W., An auto-
mated test for the detection of significant bacteriuria. Lancet ii, 400
142. Wisdom, C. B., Enzyme-immunoassay. Clin. Chem. 22, 1243
(1976).
(1976). Review.
167. Picciolo, G. L., Chapelle, E. W., Thomas, R. R., and McGarry,
143. Hersch, L. S., Vann, W. P., and Wilhelm, S. A., A luminol-as-
M. A., Performance characteristics of a new photometer with a moving
sisted competitive binding immunoassay of human IgG. Abstracts,
filter tape for luminescence assay. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 34, 720
Xth International Congress of Clinical Chemistry, Mexico City,
(1977).
1978.
168. Cutekunst, R. R., Deming, J. W., Jaffe, B. D., et al., Clinical re-
144. Schroeder, H. R., Vogelhut, P. 0., Carrico, R. J., et al., Com-
sults using centnifugation and filtration procedures with the firefly
petitive protein binding assay for biotin monitored by chemilumi-
luciferaseATP assay.Detection of bacteria in urine and blood and
nescence. Anal. Chem. 48, 1933 (1976).
antibiotic susceptibility testing. In ref. 93, p 491.
145. Arakawa, H., Maeda, M., and Tsuji, A., Enzyme immunoassay
169. Ansehn, S., Nelsson, L., Hojer, H., and Thore, A., Antibiotic
of cortisol by chemiluminescence reaction of luminol-peroxidase.
susceptibility testing and determination of antibiotic concentrations.
Bunseki Kagaku 26, 322 (1977).
In ref. 93, p 189.
146. Carrico, J. R., Yeung, K. K., Schroeder, H. R., et al., Specific
protein-binding reactions monitored with ligand-ATP conjugates and 170. Thore, A., Nilsson, L., Hojer, H., et al., Effects of ampicillin on
firefly luciferase. Anal. Biochem. 76,95 (1976). intracellularlevelsof adenosine triphosphate in bacterialcultures
related to antibiotic susceptibility. Acta Pat hol. Micro biol. Scand.
147. Carrico, R. J., Christner, J. E., Boguslaski, R. C., and Yeung, K.
(Sect. B.) 85, 161 (1977).
K., A method for monitoring specific binding reactions with cofactor
labeled ligands. Anal. Biochem. 72, 271 (1976). 171. H#{246}jer,
H., Nilsson, L., Ansehn, S., and Thore, A., In vitro effect
of doxycycline on levels of adenosine triphosphate in bacterial cul-
148. Schroeder, H. R., Carrico, R. J., Boguslaski, R. C., and Christner,
tures. Scand. J. Infect. Dis. Suppl. 9,58 (1976).
J. E., Specific binding reactions monitored with ligand-cofactor
conjugates and bacterial luciferase. Anal. Biochem., 72, 283 (1976). 172. Lee, Y. S., and Crispen, R. C., Rapid quantitative measurement
of drug susceptibility of mycobacteria. In ref. 93, p 219.
149. Stanley, P. E., Application of analytical bioluminescence to the
enzyme multiplied immunoassay technique. In Liquid Scintillation 173. Nilsson, L., Hojer, H., Ansehn, S., and Thore, A., A rapid sem-
Counting, 5, P. Johnson and M. Crook, Eds., Heyden and Son, Lon- iautomated bioassay of gentamicin based on luciferaseassay of bac-.
don, 1978, p 79. terial adenosine triphosphate.Scand. J. Infect. Dis. 9,232 (1977).
150. Schroeder, H. R., Yeager, F. M., Boguslaski, R. C., et al., Im- 174. Harber, M. J., and Asscher, A. W., A new method for antibiotic
munoassay for thyroxine monitored by chemiluminescence. Clin. assay based on measurement of bacterial ATP using the firefly
Chem. 23, 1132 (1977). Abstract. bioluminescent system. J. Antimicrob. Chemot her. 3,35 (1977).
151. Maier, C., Luminescent conjugates for immunological analy- 175. Strange, R. W., Wade, H. E., and Dark, F. A., Effect of starvation
sis-Comprising a complex formed between a pharmacologically, on adenosine triphosphate concentrations in Aerobacter aerogenes.
immunologically or biochemically active ligand and a chemilumi- Nature 199,55 (1963).
nescent compound. Belgian Patent 856,182 (1977). 176. Nakao, K., Wada, T., Kamiyama, T., et al., A direct relationship
152. Velan, B., and Halmann, M., Chemiluminescence immunoassay, between adenosine triphosphate level and in vivo viability of eryth-
a new sensitive method for determination of antigens. Immuno- rocytes. Nature 194, 877 (1962).
chemistry 15, 331 (1978). 177. Cabrio, B. W., Finch, C. A., and Huennekens, F. M., Erythrocyte
153. Tsuji, A., Maeda, M., Arakawa, H., et al., Enzyme immunoassay preservation: A topic in molecular biochemistry. Blood 11, 103
of hormones and drugs by using fluorescence and chemiluminescence (1956).
reaction. In International Symposium on Enzyme Labeled Immu- 178. Wolff,P. L.,Walters,P.,and Singh, P.,An investigation
of blood
190. Ziprin, R. L., Phagocytosis by sheep alveolar macrophages: 207. Bowling, J. L., Dean, J. A., Goldstein, G., and Dale, J. M., Rapid
relation between opsonin concentration and light emission in the determination of chromium in natural waters by chemiluminescence
presence of luminol. Infect. Immun. 19, 889 (1978). with a centrifugal fast analyzer. Anal. Chim. Acta 76, 47 (1975).
208. Malcolm, P. J., and Stanley, P. E., A unified approach to the
191. Hatch, G. E., Gardner, D. E., and Menzel, D. B., Chemilumi-
liquid scintillation counting process I: A comprehensive stochastic
nescence of phagocytic cells caused by N-formylmethionyl peptides.
J. Exp. Med. 147, 182 (1978). model. J. Appi. Radiat. Isotopes 27, 397 (1976).
192. Van Dyke, K., Trush, M., Wilson, M., et al., Luminol-dependent 209. Malcolm, P. J., and Stanley, P. E., A unified approach to the
chemiluminescent analysis of cellular and humoral defects in phag- liquid scintillation counting process-Il: Optimising optical design.
ocytosis using a Chem-Glow photometer. Microchem. J. 22, 463 J. App!. Radiat. Isotopes 27,415 (1976).
(1977). 210. Carter, T. J. N., Kricka, L. J., Bullock, D. G., et al., The optim-
193. Trush, M., Van Dyke, K., Wilson, M., and Reason, M., Chemi- isation of luminescence instrumentation. In ref. 29.
luminescence resulting from an interaction between imipramine and 211. Carter, T. J. N., and Stanbridge, B. R., Assessment of mixing
human polymorphonuclear leukocytes. Res. Comrnun. Chem. Pathol. efficiency using the oxidation of iodide by hydrogen peroxide. Analyst
Pharmacol. 18,645 (1977). 103, 968 (1978).
194. Miles, P., Lee, P., Trush, M., and Van Dyke, K., Chemilumi- 212. Olsson, T., Thore, A., Carlsson, H. E., et al., Quantitation of
nescence associated with phagocytosis of foreign particles in rabbit immunological reactions by luminescence.In ref. 29.
alveolar macrophages. Life Sci. 20, 165 (1977). 213. Velan, B., Schupper, H., Sery, T., and Halmann, M., Solid-phase
195. Stevens, P., and Young, L. S., Quantitative granulocyte chemi- chemiluminescent immunoassay. In ref. 29.