Professional Documents
Culture Documents
In Situ Measurement of Corrosion of Type 316L Stainless Steel in 553 K Pure Water Via The Electrical Resistance of A Thin Wire
In Situ Measurement of Corrosion of Type 316L Stainless Steel in 553 K Pure Water Via The Electrical Resistance of A Thin Wire
To cite this article: Kazushige Ishida & Derek Lister (2012) In�situ measurement of corrosion of
type 316L stainless steel in 553 K pure water via the electrical resistance of a thin wire, Journal of
Nuclear Science and Technology, 49:11, 1078-1091, DOI: 10.1080/00223131.2012.730899
ARTICLE
In situ measurement of corrosion of type 316L stainless steel in 553 K pure water via the electrical
resistance of a thin wire
Kazushige Ishidaa* and Derek Listerb
a
Hitachi Research Laboratory, Hitachi, Ltd., 7-2-1 Omika-cho, Hitachi-shi, Ibaraki-ken 319-1221, Japan; bDepartment of Chemical
Engineering, University of New Brunswick, P.O. Box 4400, Fredericton, New Brunswick E3B 5A3, Canada
(Received 3 April 2012; accepted final version for publication 4 September 2012)
A system for the in situ monitoring of corrosion depth via electrical resistance measurements was applied
to study the corrosion rate of type 316L stainless steel at 553 K in pure water. Corrosion depth was
measured using a 50 mm diameter wire probe mounted axially in the tube. Measurements were in good
agreement with literature data for both the hydrogen water chemistry (HWC) condition and the normal
water chemistry (NWC) condition. Oxide film analyses by scanning electron microscopy and laser
Raman spectroscopy on the wire probe and the tube showed no effects from shape of the test specimens
or the application of electric current. Corrosion kinetics was evaluated by fitting equations to the
measurements. Data for the HWC condition could be fitted by a two-step logarithmic–parabolic law. A
single-step logarithmic law fitted data for the NWC condition. Changes in corrosion rate by the water
chemistry changes were readily detected with the technique. Corrosion depth change could be observed
for the water chemistry change from the NWC condition to the HWC condition with electrochemical
corrosion potential (ECP) of 70.56 V vs. standard hydrogen electrode, which is lower than the ECP that
the phase of iron oxide changes from a-Fe2O3 to Fe3O4.
Keywords: type 316L stainless steel; high-temperature corrosion; hydrogen water chemistry; normal water
chemistry; in situ monitoring; corrosion kinetics
Figure 1. Schematic of in situ monitoring system. (a) Schematic of test section and measurement systems and (b) photo of wire
probe connected with lead wire.
Figure 2. SEM image of (a) cross section and (b) surface of as-received 316L SS wire probe.
Table 1. Operating conditions of high-temperature, high- which is much smaller than the inner radius of 316L SS
pressure loop. tube (3.52 mm). Hydrogen peroxide or hydrogen will
Parameters Values diffuse two-dimensionally to the 316L SS wire probe
surfaces, but will diffuse one-dimensionally to the 316L
Electrical conductivity at pure water 530 SS tube surfaces. Diffusion amount of hydrogen
tank (mS m71)
Flow rate of high-pressure metering 10.8 peroxide or hydrogen to the metal surfaces for the
pump (kg h71) 316L SS wire probe will be about eight times as large as
Test section that for the 316L SS tube by the calculation using
Temperature (K) 553 Equation (17).
Pressure (MPa) 10
Hydrogen peroxide concentration at 45
hydrogen peroxide solution tank (mg kg71)
2p ðr þ dÞ l
ðratioÞ ¼ ð17Þ
Flow rate of hydrogen peroxide injection 0.048 2p r l
pump (kg h71)
On the contrary, metal ion concentration dissolved
form the 316L SS wire probe surfaces will be eight
times as dilute as that dissolved from the 316L SS tube
Table 2. Water chemistry conditions. surfaces. Corrosion of the 316L SS wire probe may be
Chemicals larger than that of the 316L SS tube due to these
(mg kg71) phenomena.
Immersion Water chemistry The shape of specimens may also affect the surface
Run no. time (h) condition H2O2 H2
morphologies or chemical composition of oxide film.
1 168 HWC – 150 Corrosion increases the volume of 316L SS because the
2 118 NWC 1 200 – Pilling–Bedworth ratios of iron, nickel and chromium,
191 HWC – 150 major elements included in 316L SS, are 2.06, 3.92 and
51 NWC 2 200 –
3 120 HWC 200 – 1.68, respectively [21]. Oxide film thickness is 1 mm or
90 NWC – 150 less, which is a significant thickness relative to the 316L
SS wire probe radius but is a negligible thickness
relative to the 316L SS tube radius. So oxide film on
The shape of test specimens will affect the diffusion the 316L SS tube surface may grow one-dimensionally.
amount of hydrogen peroxide or hydrogen to the metal On the contrary, oxide film on the 316L SS wire probe
surfaces and the diffusion amount of metal ion from may grow two-dimensionally.
metal surfaces. Diffusion layer thickness (d) was Current application may function as cathodic
calculated to be 169 mm from Equation (13) using the protection [22,23], which may affect surface and cross
mass transfer coefficient of straight pipe (Km, Equation section morphologies or chemical composition of oxide
(14)), diffusion coefficient of hydrogen peroxide (D), film. However, the increased temperature of the 316L
equivalent diameter of flow path (d), Reynolds number SS wire probe by supplying a current is negligible as
(Re) and Schmidt number (Sc) [15,19,20]. Diffusion described in Section 2.1.
coefficient of hydrogen peroxide (D) at 553 K was
obtained from the Einstein–Stokes equation (Equation
3. Results and discussion
(15)) using viscosity of water (Z), Boltzmann constant
(kb) and radius of chemical species (rC) [15]. Equivalent 3.1. Effects of temperature elevation
diameter of flow path (d) was calculated from Equation Measurements of resistance during temperature
(16) using volume (M) and surface area (S) of test elevation in Run 1 are shown in Figure 4. Data
section. considered to be for the steady state at each
temperature are plotted as open circles. Set tempera-
D
d¼ ð13Þ tures are also shown in Figure 4. Based on the
Km measurements during temperature elevation, the tem-
perature dependence of specific resistivity of the 316L
D
K ¼ 0:0165 Re0:86 Sc0:33 ð14Þ SS wire probe was obtained and is shown in Figure 5,
d along with literature data for 316L SS [14]. Resistivity
was calculated supposing that the diameter of 316L SS
kT wire probe was 50 mm. The result was empirically
D¼ ð15Þ
6p Z rC expressed as Equation (18).
4M
d¼ ð16Þ
S r ¼ c1 T2 þ c2 T þ c3 ð18Þ
Diffusion layer thickness is about three times as Here, c1 ¼ 3.434 6 10712 O m K72, c2 ¼ 71.502 6
large as the radius of 316L SS wire probe (25 mm), but 1079 O m K71, c3 ¼ 9.843 6 1077 O m.
Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology, Volume 49, No. 11, November 2012 1083
The correlation coefficient is 0.998, which is better AISI 660 SS, resistivity changed less than 5% [24]. So,
than that for first order fitting (correlation coefficient: the effect of heat treatment may be small for 316L SS,
0.967). These results are about 25% higher than the because 316L SS is one type of austenitic stainless steel.
literature data at 553 K. Diametrical variation From these considerations, the compositional variation
(+5 mm) of 316L SS wire probe is considered to be is considered to be the most probable cause.
one reason for the deviation of +20%. Some data for
annealed specimens have been summarized in the
literature [24]. Data scatter of +6% (grey area of 3.2. Fluctuation of resistance measurements
Figure 5) is attributed to compositional variation Measurements of resistance at 553 K in Run 1 are
within the specifications of 316L SS and this is a shown in Figure 6. After reaching the set temperature
second reason for the resistivity difference. Regarding at the test section, the corrosion depth measurement
the effect of cold working on resistivity of 316L SS, it was started and the immersion time was defined as 0 h.
was reported that resistivity of specimens strained 40% Fluctuations in the resistance measurements are with-
in tension is about 1% higher than that of annealed in +0.05 O , which corresponds to a corrosion depth
specimens [25]. The effect of heat treatment is of +0.007 mm. Since corrosion depths are about
considered as a third reason. Resistivity was reported 0.5 mm, the fluctuations are about +1.4%.
to change about 10–100% in precipitation-hardened
type AISI 631 SS [24]. However, for austenitic type
3.3. Corrosion depth
The measurements of corrosion depth for Run 1 are
shown in Figure 7. Measured ECP at the steady state
is 70.56 V vs. SHE (listed in Table 3). Literature data
for 561 K water containing small amounts of dissolved
oxygen (55 mg kg71) with no hydrogen (no ECP
reported) [10] and for 561 K water containing dis-
solved oxygen (15 mg kg71) and dissolved hydrogen
(150 mg kg71; ECP of 70.46 V vs. SHE) [12] are also
plotted. The results of this work are in good agreement
with the data of [12], although the data of [10] are
about one order of magnitude lower. Since corrosion at
or near the activate state is known to be sensitive to
ECP, and since a slight amount of oxygen will change
the ECP, the deviation from [10] results may be due to
differences in ECP. Hydrogen enhances the anodic
current, which would cause of lowering the ECP even
though oxygen concentration is the same [26]. Hydro-
Figure 4. Resistance change during temperature elevation gen is the reducing agent to dissolve the protective
for Run 1. oxide film and that might enhance the corrosion.
Figure 5. Temperature dependence of resistivity of 316L SS Figure 6. Immersion time dependence of measured
wire probe. resistance for Run 1.
1084 K. Ishida and D. Lister
Figure 9. SEM image of surface and cross section of oxide film formed under HWC condition for Run 1.
Figure 11. SEM image of surface and cross section of oxide film formed under NWC condition for Run 2.
dW bk
¼ or W ¼ k lnðb0 t þ 1Þ ð20Þ
dt btþ1
However, base metal is covered insufficiently by the change, 54 h was needed to get the steady state of ECP.
oxide film under the HWC condition. The ECP of the HWC condition for Run 3 is higher
than that for Run 2. The reason for the ECP difference
itself and for the difference in the decrease of ECP
3.6. Effects of water chemistry change on corrosion between Run 2 and Run 3 under HWC condition may
Corrosion depths for Run 2 and Run 3 are shown be because of a small amount of oxygen ingress into
in Figures 16 and 17, respectively. For the case of Run the pure water tank in Run 3. Deionized water sparged
2, ECPs of the first NWC condition (NWC 1), the by argon was supplied continuously during Run 3.
HWC condition and the second NWC condition Oxygen might not have been sufficiently degassed from
(NWC 2) were þ0.15, 70.56 and þ0.00 V vs. SHE the water. The change from the NWC condition to the
at the steady state, respectively. Water chemistry was HWC condition did not increase the corrosion depth
changed from the NWC condition to the HWC for Run 3.
condition at 118 h. After the water chemistry change, The difference of corrosion behaviour by the water
14 h was needed to get the steady state of ECP. Water chemistry change might be attributable to ECP.
chemistry was changed from the HWC condition to According to thermodynamic calculations [28], the
the NWC condition at 309 h. After the water chemistry phase of iron oxide changes from a-Fe2O3 to Fe3O4 at
change, 12 h was needed to get the steady state of ECP. an ECP of 70.47 V vs. SHE. Since in Run 2 the ECP
The change from the NWC condition to the HWC decreases below 70.47 V vs. SHE under the HWC
condition increases the corrosion depth above the condition, the oxide film can undergo reconstruction
extrapolated line to continue corrosion under the NWC and promote an increase in corrosion.
condition at the same time as ECP is decreased Corrosion depth was fitted by the Equation (22)
to 70.56 V vs. SHE. By contrast, the change from the and corrosion rates were calculated.
HWC condition to the NWC condition at 309 h imme-
diately increases the corrosion depth above the extra- n
W ¼ a00 ðt t0 Þ þ W0 ð22Þ
polated line for corrosion under the HWC condition
after the chemistry change.
For the case of Run 3, ECPs of NWC and HWC Here, a0 ¼ 0.008 mm h0.05, t0 ¼ 130 h, W0 ¼ 0.364
were þ0.15 and 70.42 V vs. SHE, respectively. Water mm and n ¼ 0.95 from 130 h to 160 h; a0 ¼ 0.0012 mm
chemistry was changed from the NWC condition to the h0.32, t0 ¼ 160 h, W0 ¼ 0.384 mm and n ¼ 0.68 from
HWC condition at 118 h. After the water chemistry 160 h to 309 h; and a0 ¼ 0.0019 mm h0.45, t0 ¼ 309 h,
Figure 16. Effects of water chemistry change on corrosion Figure 17. Effects of water chemistry change on corrosion
depth for Run 2. depth for Run 3.
Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology, Volume 49, No. 11, November 2012 1089
RG: gas constant [6] R.L. Cowan, M.E. Indig, J.N. Kass, R.J. Law, and L.L.
R: radius of 316L SS wire probe Sundberg, Experience with Hydrogen Water Chemistry in
Boiling Water Reactors, Water Chemistry of Nuclear
r t: initial radius of 316L SS wire Reactor Systems 4 Vol. 1, Bournemouth, UK, October
probe 13–17, 1986, pp. 29–36.
rC: radius of chemical species [7] J. Robertson, The mechanism of high temperature
Re: Reynolds number aqueous corrosion of stainless steels, Corros. Sci. 32
R0: initial resistance of 316L SS wire (1991), pp. 443–465.
[8] C. Degueldre, S. O’Prey, and W. Francioni, An in-line
probe diffuse reflection spectroscopy study of the oxidation of
Rt: resistance of 316L SS wire probe stainless steel under boiling water reactor conditions,
at t Corros. Sci. 38 (1996), pp. 1763–1782.
S: surface area of test section [9] H. Inagaki, A. Nishikawa, Y. Sugita, and T. Tsuji,
Sc: Schmidt number Synergy effect of simultaneous zinc and nickel addition
on cobalt deposition onto stainless steel in oxygenated
t: immersion time high temperature water, J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 40 (2003),
t0 : immersion time from corrosion pp. 143–152.
rate change [10] K. Ohashi, T. Honda, E. Kashimura, and Y. Furutani,
T: temperature Effect of dissolved oxygen on corrosion of ferrous
t0: period of data fitted by materials in high temperature and high pure water,
Boshoku Gijyutsu (Corros. Eng.) 37 (1988), pp. 198–204
logarithmic rate law (1.4 h) [in Japanese].
V: potential drop [11] M. Tachibana, K. Ishida, Y. Wada, R. Shimizu, N. Ota,
W: corrosion depth and N. Hara, Determining factor for anodic polariza-
W0 : corrosion depth just before tion curve of typical structural materials of boiling water
corrosion rate change reactors in high temperature–high purity water, J. Nucl.
Sci. Technol. 49 (2012), pp. 253–262.
W 0: corrosion depth at 1.4 h [12] Y.J. Kim, Characterization of the oxide film formed on
Dr: corrosion depth of 316L SS wire type 316 stainless steel in 2888C in cyclic normal and
probe hydrogen water chemistry, Corrosion 51 (1995), pp. 849–
d: diffusion layer thickness 860.
Z: viscosity of water [13] T. Miyazawa, S. Uchida, T. Satoh, Y. Morishima, T.
Hirose, Y. Satoh, K. Iimura, Y. Wada, H. Hosokawa,
r: resistivity of 316L SS wire probe and N. Usui, Effects of hydrogen peroxide on corrosion
of stainless steel, (IV) Determination of oxide film
properties with multilateral surface analyses, J. Nucl.
Acknowledgements Sci. Technol. 42 (2005), pp. 233–241.
[14] The Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers, JSME
The authors are grateful to A. Feicht, L. Liu and P.
Data Book: Heat Transfer, 4th ed., Maruzen Co., Ltd.,
Srisukvatananan, research staff in the Nuclear Engineering
Tokyo, 1986, p. 55 [in Japanese].
Group at the University of New Brunswick, for their help
[15] The Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers, JSME
with the experiments and the surface analyses. The Natural
Steam Table, The Japan Society of Mechanical En-
Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada and
gineers, Tokyo, 1999, p. 29 [in Japanese].
the CANDU Owners Group are thanked for financial
[16] H.A. Pray, C.E. Schweickert, and B.H. Minnich,
support.
Solubility of hydrogen, oxygen, nitrogen, and helium
in water, Ind. Eng. Chem. 44 (1952), pp. 1146–1151.
[17] Y.J. Kim, Effect of variations in simulated BWR water
References chemistry on high temperature electrochemistry of
[1] R.A. Shaw, Getting at the source: reducing radiation stainless steel, Corrosion 2005, Houston, TX, April 3–
fields, Nucl. Technol. 44 (1979), pp. 97–103. 7, 2005, PN05579.
[2] C.C. Lin, A review of corrosion product transport and [18] Y.J. Kim and P.L. Andresen, Data Quality, Issues and
radiation field buildup in boiling water reactors, Prog. Guidelines for ECP Measurement in High Temperature
Nucl. Energy 51 (2009), pp. 207–224. Water, Corrosion 2001, Houston, TX, March 11–16,
[3] D.H. Lister, The transport of radioactive corrosion 2001, PN01137.
products in high-temperature water, Nucl. Sci. Eng. 59 [19] F.P. Berger and K.-F.F.-L. Hau, Mass transfer in
(1976), pp. 406–426. turbulent pipe flow measured by the electrochemical
[4] Y. Okamura, A. Sakashita, T. Fukuda, H. Yamashita, method, Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 20 (1997), p. 1185.
and T. Futami, Latest SCC Issue of Core Shroud and [20] A.J. Elliot, D.R. McCracken, G.V. Buxton, and N.D.
Recirculation Piping in Japanese BWRs, Transactions of Wood, Estimation of rate constant for near-diffusion-
the 17th International Conference on Structural Me- controlled reactions in water at high temperatures, J.
chanics in Reactor Technology, Prague, Czech Republic, Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 86 (1990), pp. 1539–1547.
August 17–22, 2003, Paper Number WG01-1. [21] N.B. Pilling and R.E. Bedworth, The oxidation of
[5] Y. Wada, N. Shigeneka, N. Uetake, and S. Uchida, metals at high temperature, J. Inst. Met. 29 (1923), pp.
Numerical Simulation of SCC Environment in a BWR 529–591.
Primary Coolant System, Proceedings of the Eighth [22] R.B. Mears and R.H. Brown, A theory of cathodic
International Symposium on Environmental Degrada- protection, Trans. Electrochem. Soc. 74 (1938), pp. 519–
tion of Materials in Nuclear Power Systems – Water 531.
Reactor Vol. 1, Amelia Island, Florida, August 10–14, [23] R.H. Brown and R.B. Mears, Cathodic protection,
1997, pp. 574–581. Trans. Electrochem. Soc. 81 (1942), pp. 455–483.
Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology, Volume 49, No. 11, November 2012 1091
[24] R.H. Bogaard, P.D. Desai, H.H. Li, and C.Y. Ho, [27] D.H. Lister and G. Venkateswaran, Effects of magne-
Thermophysical properties of stainless steels, Thermo- sium and zinc additives on corrosion and cobalt
chim. Acta 218 (1993), pp. 373–393. contamination of stainless steels in simulated BWR
[25] S.W. Yang and J.E. Spruiell, Cold-worked state and coolant, Nucl. Technol. 125 (1999), pp. 316–331.
annealing behavior of austenitic stainless steel, J. Mater. [28] D. Cubicciotti, Equilibrium chemistry of nitrogen and
Sci. 17 (1982), pp. 677–690. potential – pH diagrams for the Fe–Cr–H2O system in
[26] Y.J. Kim, Electrochemical Interactions of Hydrogen, BWR water, J. Nucl. Mater. 167 (1989), pp. 241–248.
Oxygen and Hydrogen Peroxide on Metal Surfaces in [29] O.N. Shebanova and P. Lazor, Raman spectroscopic
High Temperature, High Purity Water, Proceedings of study of magnetite (FeFe2O4): a new assignment for the
the Eighth International Symposium on Environmental vibrational spectrum, J. Solid State Chem. 174 (2003),
Degradation of Materials in Nuclear Power Systems – pp. 424–430.
Water Reactors Vol. 2, August 10–14, 1997, Amelia
Island, FL, pp. 641–648.