Daftar Pustaka

1. Folayan MO, Duangthip D, Campus G, Teshome A, Muche A, Girma B. Prevalence of

Dental Caries and Associated Factors in East Africa, 2000-2020: Systematic Review and
Meta-Analysis. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Front Public Health [Internet].
2021;9:645091. Available from: www.frontiersin.org

2. Kemenkes RI. Laporan Nasional RISKESDAS 2018. Jakarta: Badan Penelitian Dan
Pengembangan Kesehatan; 2019. 204 p. 196

3. Bjørndal L, Simon S, Tomson PL, Duncan HF. Management of deep caries and the
exposed pulp. Int Endod J. 2019 Jul 13;52(7):949–73.
4. Reda R, Mazzoni A, Coppola S. Evaluating the Outcome of Endodontic Treatment. World
Journal of Dentistry. 2020 Jul 18;11(2):89–90.

5. Mei Tng. Change in Working Length at Different Stages of Instrumentation as a Function

of Canal Curvature. [Richmond, Virginia]: Virginia Commonwealth University; 2018.

6. Mittal N, Parashar V, Suresh Patel P, Beatriz Duarte Gavião M. Case Report Endodontic
Management of Maxillary Second Molar Tooth with a Single Root and Single Canal. 2020;
Available from: https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/2829304
7. Qazi HS, Maxood A, Abdullah S. Comparison Of Radiographic and Electronic Working.
Pakistan Oral&Dental. 2007;27(1):31–4.

8. Karpagavinayagam K, Shankari SV, Srinivasan MR. Evaluation of accuracy of two

frequency-based electronic root canal length measurement devices – An Ex Vivo Study.
IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Science. 2017;16(10):63–6.

9. Matijević J, Ljubičić A, Švegar D, Verzak Ž, Krmek SJ, Karlović Z, et al. In vitro assessment
of the accuracy of three electronic apex locators. Paediatria Croatica. 2014;58(2):107
10. Michetti J, Maret D, Mallet JP, Diemer F. Validation of cone beam computed tomography
as a tool to explore root canal anatomy. J Endod. 2010 Jul;36(7):1187–90.

11. Mittal R, Singla M, Sood A, Singla A. Comparative evaluation of working length

determination by using conventional radiography, digital radiography and electronic
apex locator. Journal of Restorative Dentistry. 2015;3(3):70.

12. Kishor KN. Comparison of Working Length Determination using Apex Locator,
Conventional Radiography and Radiovisiography: An in vitro Study. J Contemp Dent
Pract. 2012 Aug;13(4):550–3.
13. Shacham M, Levin A, Shemesh A, Lvovsky A, Itzhak J ben, Solomonov M. ARTICLE
Accuracy and stability of electronic apex locator length measurements in root canals
with wide apical foramen: an ex vivo study. Available from:
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41405-020-00052-3

14. Setiawan J, Ida Permatasari W. Proses Masuk dan Persebaran Peninggalan Kebudayaan
Proto-Deutero Melayu di Indonesia. Fajar Historia: Jurnal Ilmu Sejarah dan Pendidikan.
2019 Dec 31;3(1).
15. 15. Kim E, Fallahrastegar A, Hur Y, Jung I, Kim S, Lee S. Difference in root canal length
between Asians and Caucasians. Int Endod J. 2005;38:149–51.
16. 16. Hikita Y, Yamaguchi T, Tomita D, Adel M, Nakawaki T, Katayama K, et al. Growth
hormone receptor gene is related to root length and tooth length in human teeth. Angle
Orthod. 2018 Sep 1;88(5):575–81.
17. 17. Lähdesmäki R. Sex chromosomes in human tooth root growth. Radiographic
studies on 47,XYY males, 46,XY females, 47,XXY males and 45,X/46,XX females. 2006;
18. 18. Zorba E, Vanna V, Moraitis K. Sexual dimorphism of root length on a Greek
population sample. HOMO. 2014 Apr;65(2):143–54.
19. 19. Fibryanto E, Tjin RR, Prahasti AE, Kusnoto J. Difference in Average Length of
Maxillary Incisors between the Deuteromalayid and Protomalayid Sub-races. World
Journal of Dentistry. 2021 Apr 1;12(2):111–4.
20. 20. Shah SA. Case Report Endodontic Management of Mandibular Second Premolar
with Vertucci Root Canal Configuration Type V. 2022; Available from:
https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/3197393
21.
 35. Nagaş IÇ, Eğilmez F, Kivanç BH. The Permanent Maxillary and Mandibular Premolar
Teeth. In: Dental Anatomy. InTech; 2018.

5.